Coverage gaps and exclusions
The framework may fall short of genuinely universal coverage unless exclusions are narrowed and stronger protections ensure communities are not left outside the obligation.
This bill is currently before Parliament.
Transport & communications
People outdoors across Australia would gain reasonable access to basic mobile coverage on an equitable basisFair access for people in different circumstances..
Communications Minister Anika Wells (Labor) said mobile access is essential for public safety, but the existing nationwide service guarantee covers landlines and payphones rather than mobiles. Traditional mobile networks cover only about one-third of Australia's land, although around 99 per cent of people live and work within that coverage. The government said satellites that connect directly to ordinary phones could extend voice calls and texts into uncovered areas, helping people contact Triple Zero — Australia's emergency number. It introduced the bill before the technology was widely available because leaving the rollout to industry alone could leave some Australians behind.
Australia already had a Universal Service Obligation for fixed voice services and payphones, but it did not cover mobile phones, even as regional and remote communities faced unreliable outdoor coverage and difficulty reaching Triple Zero. The 2024 Regional Telecommunications Review considered reform options, and Anika Wells MP introduced the Bill on 27 November 2025 to create a Universal Outdoor Mobile ObligationA proposed nationwide guarantee of reasonable outdoor mobile coverage. that could adapt as terrestrial and satellite technology develops.
Helen Haines (Independent) argued that “reasonably available” and “equitable basisFair access for people in different circumstances.” were too unclear and could let phone companies decide who receives meaningful coverage. She warned that many people might need newer phones or costly plans, noting a latest iPhone started at $1,399. Haines said this could exclude pensioners, young families and other people unable to afford compatible devices. A proposed amendment from Melissa McIntosh (Liberal) also argued that satellite voice technology was not yet available at scale, many phones would be incompatible and the bill did not expressly guarantee Triple Zero calls or texts.
Anika Wells MP introduced this bill. Supportive speeches so far have come from Labor, Liberal Party, Centre Alliance, Greens, some crossbench members.
Did it become law?
Not yet
Final passage
No final vote yet
The bill has not yet completed passage through Parliament.
Days since introduction
253 days
Updated 07 Aug 2026.
Meaning
People outdoors across Australia would gain reasonable access to basic mobile coverage on an equitable basisFair access for people in different circumstances..
Mobile users would initially receive voice calls and text messages through the new coverage. The minister could add other services later.
Telstra, Optus and TPG customers would be covered from 1 December 2027. The minister could move the date or delay it by up to three years.
People across the states, mainland territories, Christmas Island and the Cocos (Keeling) Islands would be included. Western Australia's Australian Radio Quiet ZoneA protected Western Australian area where radio transmissions are restricted. is excluded.
Mobile customers could receive standards covering prices, reliability, call quality, text-message performance, repair times and network congestion.
People in buildings, vehicles, aircraft, boats, underground or underwater would not count as being outdoors under the bill.
12F What is the universal outdoor mobile obligation? (1) For the purposes of this Act, the universal outdoor mobile obligation is the obligation to ensure that mobile coverage is reasonably available outdoors to all people in Australia on an equitable basis. (2) The obligation mentioned in subsection (1) includes the obligation to supply each kind of designated mobile telecommunications service such that the service is reasonably available outdoors throughout Australia. (3) An obligation does not arise under subsection (1) or (2): (a) in relation to a location that is not in the general AuTelecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) introduced text
8BB Kinds of designated mobile telecommunications services (1) Each of the following is a kind of designated mobile telecommunications service: (a) a mobile telecommunications service that enables an end‑user to communicate, by means of voice calls, with other end‑users; (b) a mobile telecommunications service that: (i) is a short message service; and (ii) enables an end‑user to communicate with other end‑users; (c) a kind of mobile telecommunications service determined under subsection (2). (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(c), the Minister may, by legislative instrument, determineTelecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) introduced text
12L Default primary universal outdoor mobile providers (1) The Minister is taken to determine under section 12J, on the day mentioned in subsection 12M(1), that each of the following is a primary universal outdoor mobile provider, in respect of each outdoor mobile obligation, for the general Australian outdoor mobile coverage area: (a) Telstra Limited; (b) Optus Mobile Pty Limited; (c) TPG Telecom Limited. (2) Despite subsection 12J(5), the determination that the Minister is taken to make is not a legislative instrument. (3) Subsection (1) of this section, and paragraphs 12M(5)(c) and (dTelecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) introduced text
8D Outdoor mobile coverage areas (1) Subject to subsection (3), an outdoor mobile coverage area is: (a) a geographical area within Australia; or (b) any area of land; regardless of size. (2) Subject to subsection (3), the general Australian outdoor mobile coverage area is the outdoor mobile coverage area consisting of Australia. (3) An area determined under subsection (4) is not, and is not part of, an outdoor mobile coverage area or the general Australian outdoor mobile coverage area. (4) For the purposes of subsection (3), the Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine an areaTelecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) introduced text
Subdivision C—Universal outdoor mobile obligation standards, benchmarks and rules 12Q Standards (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine standards to be complied with by primary universal outdoor mobile providers in relation to any or all of the following matters relating to designated mobile telecommunications services supplied, or proposed to be supplied, in fulfilment of the universal outdoor mobile obligation: (a) the terms and conditions (whether or not relating to price or a method of ascertaining price) of the supply of a designated mobile telecommunications serviceTelecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) introduced text
outdoors does not include: (a) in a building, vehicle, aircraft or vessel; or (b) underground or underwater.Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) introduced text
Context
Australia already had a Universal Service Obligation for fixed voice services and payphones, but it did not cover mobile phones, even as regional and remote communities faced unreliable outdoor coverage and difficulty reaching Triple Zero. The 2024 Regional Telecommunications Review considered reform options, and Anika Wells MP introduced the Bill on 27 November 2025 to create a Universal Outdoor Mobile ObligationA proposed nationwide guarantee of reasonable outdoor mobile coverage. that could adapt as terrestrial and satellite technology develops.
Australia’s existing USO is established
The existing Universal Service Obligation was created after Telstra’s privatisation to support fixed voice services and payphones, but it did not include mobile coverage.
Hansard ↗Regional Telecommunications Review considers reform
The 2024 Regional Telecommunications Review considered options for reforming Australia’s longstanding universal service arrangements.
Australian Parliament House ↗Anika Wells MP introduces the bill
The Bill proposed a statutory framework that would, by default, apply to the three national mobile network operators and cover outdoor voice and SMSA standard mobile-phone text message. services.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Regional residents report failed Triple Zero calls and patchy coverage
Debate recorded a case in Waaia where a constituent could not make a Triple Zero call during her child’s epileptic seizure, alongside intermittent reception in Bearii and broader regional gaps.
Hansard ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Considered by scrutiny committee (04/02/2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 2 of 2026
Scrutiny Digest 2 of 2026
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Referred to Committee (05/03/2026): Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee; Committee report (14/05/2026)
Report tabled 14 May 2026
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Key criticism
Helen Haines (Independent) argued that “reasonably available” and “equitable basisFair access for people in different circumstances.” were too unclear and could let phone companies decide who receives meaningful coverage. She warned that many people might need newer phones or costly plans, noting a latest iPhone started at $1,399. Haines said this could exclude pensioners, young families and other people unable to afford compatible devices. A proposed amendment from Melissa McIntosh (Liberal) also argued that satellite voice technology was not yet available at scale, many phones would be incompatible and the bill did not expressly guarantee Triple Zero calls or texts.
Haines supported the bill's aim and said it could save lives if implemented properly. The government said existing emergency-call rules would apply to voice services delivered under the new obligation, while flexible timing would account for changing technology and market readiness.
Coverage gaps and exclusions
The framework may fall short of genuinely universal coverage unless exclusions are narrowed and stronger protections ensure communities are not left outside the obligation.
Unproven satellite delivery
Reliance on developing direct-to-device satellite technology could leave service reliability, affordability and emergency access uncertain in regional Australia.
Implementation and device access
Without rigorous oversight, clear obligations and compatibility protections, the scheme may not provide affordable, dependable service and could disadvantage people using older devices.
Further sources
Votes
No recorded votes have been found yet for this bill.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Wells supports the bill because it will require Australia's three mobile operators to provide reasonably available outdoor voice and SMSA standard mobile-phone text message. coverage nationwide, improving equitable access to essential communications and public safety.
Read in Hansard ↗Andrew Wallace supports the goal of universal outdoor mobile coverage but opposes the bill in its current form, backing a reasoned amendment and seeking a Senate inquiry because the technology is unproven and protections for handset compatibility and emergency calls are inadequate.
Read in Hansard ↗David Littleproud supports the bill as a positive step for rural telecommunications, but argues it should also require mobile towers to be maintained and make better use of existing universal service funding.
Read in Hansard ↗Helen Haines supports the bill as an important step toward universal mobile coverage, but argues it must be strengthened to ensure affordable access, disaster roaming, transparent exclusions and timely fault repairs.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
19 speakers · 19 support
“We know that this legislation is the right decision because we know it's what rural and remote communities need right now across Australia. Extensive consultation informed this legislation with industry, consumer representatives, state and local governments as well as telecommunications stakeholders. That included mobile network providers, consumer advocacy groups and regional representatives. It's a collaborative process that has helped ensure the framework is practical, flexible and focused on public outcomes. It's been designed with the communities it will serve. The rural and remote communities have been at the absolute forefront of this thinking. It's so important because, at its core, connectivity is about safety, about equitable access to services and about better access to emergency services and support. This is exactly what this bill is focused on.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise today to support the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025 and to applaud the Albanese Labor government's commitment to strengthening the resilience of Australia's telecommunications service. The Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation will require national mobile carriers Telstra, Optus and TPG to provide access to SMS and voice coverage for Australians nationwide, almost everywhere you can see the sky.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It is not about waiting for perfection; it is about taking a big step forward. The vision is clear: a country where you can step outside, look up and connect, no matter where you live, no matter where you work, no matter where you travel. For the Hunter, that vision matters. That's why I support the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025, and that's why I commend it to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“As I have said, this bill that's before us should be embraced by all in this place, particularly regional members. It establishes for the first time in our history a universal outdoor mobile obligation. It says that, in our country, if you can see the sky, you should be able to access voice and mobile phones. For many in my part of the world, that is a game changer. The idea that you can drive throughout the region—my own region—and not get the SOS is something that many would welcome, knowing that on those catastrophic days you'll still be able to receive text messages and the early warning. That you'll still be able to receive voice calls is a game changer. Knowing that, if your daughter or son is driving home via Eppalock and something happens, they'll be able contact you—these things make a difference. They will ensure that all of us have the same opportunity as others in other parts of the country. I commend the bill and the reforms to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“A mobile phone is now how many Australians call for help, receive emergency information, access transport updates, produce a digital licence, make payments, contact family and interact with essential services. The law needs to recognise that reality. For communities across the country and for the constituents in Carlton and in my whole electorate, this bill sends a clear message: reliable mobile coverage matters and the standard we accept must keep rising. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill will modernise Australia's universal service arrangements to provide equitable access to basic mobile coverage outdoors and provide all Australians greater access to essential telecommunications services, improving public safety and ensuring critical new technology is available as widely and as equitably possible.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“As I've said, this bill reflects the Albanese Labor government's foundational belief that every Australian, regardless of where they live, should have access to a basic level of mobile connectivity. Whether someone is facing a natural disaster stuck on a country road, hurt while working on a property or lost in remote bushland, the universal outdoor mobile obligation bill is designed to make sure mobile services are there at the moments when it matters the most. For people in rural, regional and remote parts of Australia, leveraging direct-to-device satellite technology from low-Earth-orbit satellites will translate to greater safety. In modern Australia, this baseline requirement is critical.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is a landmark reform. It is a bold step forward that embraces the future and puts people first, and I'm immensely proud to support this legislation. I'm proud to be part of the government that is finally delivering the connectivity that regional Australia deserves, because Labor understands the regions. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“When I return to the story I began with, I think about the waiting, the uncertainty—that distance between need and help. A simple text could have changed that experience for me completely. Being able to make a call when you need to is not a luxury anymore. It is a baseline expectation in a modern nation. This bill updates our laws to reflect that expectation. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Our vision is clear. We are not sitting back waiting for technology to evolve to its own timetable. We're acting early to ensure that Australians benefit from emerging technologies as quickly and as equitably as possible. Improving coverage is a key concern for communities and a priority of this government. The UOMO ensures that almost anywhere Australians can see the sky, they will have access to outdoor mobile voice and text services. It means that when you look up, you can connect. No matter where you live or what you do, you deserve that connection.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Another wild ride in the chamber! I rise to speak in support of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025. On its face, this appears to be a technical reform, a structural amendment to telecommunications legislation. But when you strip away the statutory language and regulatory framing, the underlying proposition is remarkably simple: in modern Australia, if you're standing outdoors, under an open sky, you should reasonably expect to be able to make a phone call or send a text message, not stream a film, not upload gigabytes of data, not conduct high-definition conferencing—just call or send a message. For the first time, mobile voice and SMS services will be brought within Australia's universal services framework. That is not symbolic; it is structural and it reflects something fundamental. The way Australians communicate has changed dramatically. But, until now, the legal framework governing universal access has not fully caught up.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to support the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025. There has been a break in the debate from the last sitting, and I reference the contribution made by, I think, the member for Parkes, who was critical of this bill because he thought that it didn't go far enough. My question really is: what is the alternative? This is a chance either to do something or to do nothing. While it's quite an amazing statistic that something like 99 per cent of Australians are covered at the moment by mobile phone coverage, that also means that two-thirds of the Australian landmass is not covered. And so we need a practical solution that doesn't technically exist yet but we're working towards. At least this legislation does set down those guidelines clearly for industry to follow, and it does lead the way. It does focus the attention of industry to solve this problem. But, like the member for Parkes, who does represent an area where I grew up—in the town of Broken Hill—I share that frustration of being a member of an outer metropolitan seat. I know the frustration of having poor mobile phone coverage. Even though the community that I represent today and the community that I grew up in might be separated by geography, they are certainly not separated by demography. The communities that I represent are hardworking working-class Australians, committed to their families and their communities. And they have one other thing in common as well, which is poor mobile phone reception.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“There is no doubt in my mind that our telco providers are beholden to their shareholders. They are for-profit organisations. But they also have an obligation to provide services to every community across the country, and this is one way that our government wants to hold those telcos to account, to say, 'You need to do better and you need to do better for every Australian, not just Australians in our cities.' That's why today I'm rising to speak in support of the Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation—because it establishes a new framework to create this obligation. It complements the existing universal service obligation, which applies to fixed voice services and payphones—which are also incredibly important right across our community—but this is a significant and important reform that will bring mobile services within that universal services framework. More Australians now have mobile devices than have landlines, so it's important that as government and as parliament we ask the telcos to make sure that they are providing universal services to mobile phones.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The promise of connectivity is one that successive governments have made, but only this side has kept it. We told Australians that mobile phones would keep them connected. This has been true for most of us most of the time, but not for residents like those in Bundeena and Maianbar that are navigating a single lane road, not for hikers and trail runners in the Royal National Park, not for the thousands of commuters on Heathcote Road—who deserve the same coverage as any other major Sydney arterial—and not for the constituents of Hughes, who have held up phones and found nothing there. This bill starts keeping the promise properly, with a clear obligation and technology that can actually deliver it. This bill says that no Australian anywhere should look up, see the sky and find a phone call out of reach. To the people of Bundeena and Maianbar, to hikers in the Royal National Park, to the drivers of Heathcote Road and to every constituent in Hughes: this bill is about addressing your concerns and giving you peace of mind. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Mobile telecommunications are essential to people in Australia, especially in regional, rural and remote areas. Stakeholders have longstanding concerns for public safety, given gaps in terrestrial mobile coverage, including on many regional and remote roads. In response, the universal outdoor mobile obligation will require major mobile network operators Telstra, Optus and TPG Telecom and any other providers designated in the future to provide outdoor baseline mobile coverage across Australia on an equitable basis. This reform will benefit all Australians, particularly remote and regional communities, by expanding baseline mobile coverage, which will in turn improve public safety by enabling connectivity to essential services and triple zero.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise today to strongly support the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025, a bill that will make a tangible, everyday difference for Australians in every electorate, especially for those living in our fast-growing suburbs and our outer-metro communities, like in my electorate of Pearce and the regions that keep this nation moving. I want to start, as I always do, with the people behind this policy—the families, the small-business owners and the community volunteers who have told me again and again that mobile coverage is not just about convenience anymore. It's about connection, about safety and about opportunity.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The UOMO is a critical part of our comprehensive work to reduce the digital divide, increase productivity, support economic growth and meet Australia's growing demand for data and seamless connectivity. I know a decade ago it was almost impossible to work from home in many parts of my electorate because of the quality of ADSL. The NBN, as it came online, improved that, step by step. The increase in fibre to the home has been a game changer for people in the Blue Mountains and Hawkesbury in being able to run their businesses effectively and successfully from home. I know I tried to do it in the early 2000 with dial-up, followed quickly by the first version of ADSL. It was hard as a small business having to manage that communication side and the volume of material that you could send. So I look back on those days and see how far we have come, particularly thanks to the NBN and the expansion of the mobile phone towers that I fought for for so many years. This is the next step—to make sure that, when people go outdoors into the wild almost anywhere in Australia, if they can see the sky they can make a voice or text call. Our vision is absolutely clear. This is about making Australia the most connected continent in the world. I'm very pleased to support this legislation as a key part of bringing telecommunications law into the 21st century and beyond.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“With this bill and with the opportunities presented, if you can see the sky, you'll have mobile coverage—from Cairns, where there are still dead spots, right the way to the Torres Strait, where, as we've recently heard, mobile reception is critical for our border security. The Torres Strait Islanders like to record any illegal incursions and send back to Border Watch. They will be able to do that more efficiently in between the islands to make that our borders are safe, to make sure that our communities are safe. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Albanese Labor government is delivering a better and more connected future, not just for regional and remote Tasmania but for all of Australia. Labor's vision is clear: we want Australia to be the most connected continent in the world so that, no matter where you live or what you do, you can connect. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
16 speakers · 17 contributions · 8 support · 2 oppose · 3 mixed · 3 unclear
“My approach is straightforward. I support the objective of better mobile services. I support dragging telcos into a position where they meet the expectations of ordinary Australian families who do the right thing and pay their bills month in and month out. That's why this bill needs to be closely scrutinised by the Senate committee, because there are serious questions about this legislation—about whether it works in practice for communities like mine. I want to encourage everyone in my community who's had a mobile phone issue to make a submission to the Senate committee, to put your issues and challenges on the record so we can ensure that this bill is fit for purpose.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Simon Kennedy on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Kennedy supports the bill as a practical way to close mobile black spots, but says its success depends on clear obligations, realistic implementation, affordable and compatible services, and fewer regulatory barriers to infrastructure deployment.
“Reform must be grounded in technical realism, economic responsibility and rigorous oversight. I support the intention of this bill. It is good legislation, and we do need to close these mobile blackspots, but the devil will be in the detail and in the implementation. Australians and residents of the Sutherland Shire should not have to put up with blackspots as they go from their train to their work in the middle of downtown Sydney.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Simon Kennedy says the bill contains worthwhile reforms but wants more parliamentary scrutiny before they become law, particularly of enforcement, spectrum allocation, pricing, device compatibility and delivery. He is willing to work with the government but wants a credible plan to improve mobile coverage and protect emergency-call access.
“There is some structural reform in this bill, and structural reform of this scale warrants comprehensive parliamentary examination before it's locked into law. We want to make sure the definitions, the enforcement mechanisms, the spectrum allocation, the pricing implications and the device compatibility all get the detailed interrogation they deserve. Most importantly, we want to see how this will be physically delivered, developed, scrutinised and put into action—so we are calling for more scrutiny on this bill. Given the government's record on 3G and triple zero, due diligence on this isn't optional; it's essential.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“I stand to support the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025 in principle and support what the government is trying to achieve here in the evolving shape of telecommunications. Particularly for those of us that represent rural and remote electorates, it's important. This evolving technology gives us hope because, at the moment, there isn't a lot of hope for us. Many of the telcos have packed up and left, and that cancer that started in regional Australia is now spreading to peri-urban areas around capital cities.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“However, the credibility of any reform rests not on what it aims to do but on the detail. It contains the realism of its implementation. That is why this bill must be deeply scrutinised. Any measure to improve connectivity must work in the paddock, in the truck cabin and on the shop floor. The legislative framework must genuinely expand coverage in a practical, reliable and affordable way. 'Obligation' is a very serious word in law, and it must be clearly defined so that carriers understand precisely what is expected of them and, more importantly, so consumers understand. Terms like 'reasonably available equitable access' are dangerous if they are left as broad, sweeping concepts open to interpretation. They must be translated into measurable, enforceable standards. Without clarity and a strong compliance framework, there is a risk that this obligation will be impossible to monitor and even harder to enforce. Australians deserve more than an ambitious headline; they deserve a framework that stands up under pressure and delivers tangible outcomes.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Australia's geography makes connectivity both challenging and critical. While new technologies provide an opportunity to ensure that our regions have access to telecommunications services, they must be matched by genuine reliability, not just promises. So, in conclusion, I support further scrutiny of this bill by referral to a Senate committee. Such diligence is essential for essential infrastructure such as this bill proposes.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise today to support the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025. Let me say from the outset, the coalition took a telecommunications universal service obligation to the last election. Essentially, that means that the service for telecommunications and data would be the same for city people as what's delivered to country people. That seems pretty fair and reasonable, particularly given what rural and regional Australia contributes to the overall economy, doesn't it? Let's look at what they do contribute. All the food and fibre is grown out in rural and regional Australia, all the mining royalties are generated in regional Australia and over $1 billion in coalmining is generated out in the regions, so it should be pretty fair for the regional and rural areas to get the same amount of telecommunications as the city.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I hear Labor members talking about coverage in 99 per cent of where people live, and I look forward to that. I will be making sure that I keep in a folder all of the contributions that Labor members make to quote back at them in the future, because I welcome what is being proposed here.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I support the reasoned amendment moved by the member for Lindsay. I call on the government to refer this bill to the Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee, and I call on the government in the strongest possible terms to come back to this House with a bill that is worthy of the obligation it claims to create. Australians deserve nothing less. It doesn't matter whether you live in the bush or you live in the cities. Australians deserve to be in a modern day world—in the 21st century. They deserve to be able to pick up one of these phones that is their lifeline to the world and expect that it is going to work—not only if the weather's fine and if they hold up their hand and left foot, but always and at all times, because their lives sometimes depend on it. (Time expired)”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House is of the opinion that the bill:”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We don't want the one-size-fits-all outcome for communications; we want to use all the technology—mobile phone towers, direct to device, low orbit satellites. Technology is moving fast in this area, and whoever's in government will have to keep up. So you have our support for the concept; we just want to see it deliver better outcomes on the ground. As the member for Riverina said in his speech earlier—and apparently he's going to keep a folder of all the presentations by Labor members talking about how great this is going to be—it's great to talk about it here in the House of Representatives. It'll pass. It'll pass the Senate, I believe. Then it will be about the deliver and whether we actually get those better outcomes. We'll be holding the government to account on that.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I support the intent of the bill and of the amendments moved by the member for Lindsay, and I commend them to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill must go to a Senate committee. That is what the coalition will be calling for. Structural reform of this scale warrants comprehensive parliamentary examination. Given the government's record on 3G and triple zero, due diligence is not optional; it's essential. The coalition is serious about genuine reform that brings the USO into the 21st century and addresses complex issues, not just headline grabs and political wins.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In one short document, we've gone from universal coverage to coverage if the technology is invented to coverage if the technology is invented, providing you have the right handset, to coverage if the technology is invented, you have the right handset and the minister thinks it's a good idea. Is it any wonder this Labor government has lost the trust of those in regional Australia, many of whom are trying to run a business and a family with one hand tied behind their backs and the other up in the air trying to get a signal?”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“While I recognise the intent of the bill and welcome the requirement for major telcos to provide reasonable and equitable outdoor mobile coverage, I have concerns about whether the bill as drafted will actually deliver regional Australians the services that they need and deserve. The government claims that the universal obligation will provide coverage almost everywhere, yet it hasn't been clear about what this means, and who will be left out, or about the new technologies that we'll really rely on that have not been widely trialled, tested or proven in Australia.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The intent is right. We absolutely want to provide coverage for everyone. But, unfortunately, like so many things that this government does, the intent might be good, but the delivery has to be there. The concern I have with this legislation is not with the legislation itself—as I said, the intent is there—but the minister who has carriage of this legislation has a track record of not being able to deliver when it comes to important legislation. We saw this minister, when they were the Minister for Aged Care, fail to support the aged-care industry and aged-care residents. They needed to be reshuffled across to communications. We've seen that failure when it came to the triple zero debacle and the 3G debacle. We've seen that with the social media ban—a big announcement. We saw them fly to New York and spend over $100,000 of taxpayer money for a five- or six-minute speech to claim all the glory of the legislation. Speak to any high-school kid, though. I've got a son in year 7, and he has said to me that all his mates are on social media. I still valiantly keep him off social media. Let's hope he actually listens to his dad.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I know that the Minister for Housing is completely ignorant of how people live their lives in the 21st century, and, as a consequence, she doesn't understand what she seeks to wreak upon our communities. But some of us are very squarely focused on what people need, which is why the universal outdoor mobile obligation is such an important part of the conversation. We know that, when Australians have a big problem with being able to access services, there is a role for government, to make sure that we bridge the divide—but I realise that the Minister for Housing is now leaving the chamber in humiliation, because of the shrill responses we have heard. That's her choice. We're going to continue to focus on how we build the housing infrastructure we need to promote homeownership. We're going to continue to build the telecommunications and telephonic infrastructure we need to make sure that Australians can live their lives and live out the best of their lives. At the end of the day, the Labor Party only has one pathway forward—they want to control your lives as Australians. They want to be able to grab the artifice and the instruments of the state, dictate to people how to live their lives and control their lives, whether it's economically, socially or educationally, through every stage. Some of us are going to stand up against it. Some of us are going to stand up for empowering Australians, whether it's in homeownership or making sure people have access to telecommunications services.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 support
“I rise to speak to the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025. For too long, Australians, including in my electorate, have put up with dreadful and patchy phone service due to privatisation, cost cutting and government neglect. Both Labor and Liberal governments have not addressed the inevitable failures resulting from Telstra's privatisation, and my constituents are paying the price. This bill updates the relevant legislation to better reflect modern technology but doesn't address the real issue at its heart: privatisation of what should be public services does not work. The Greens will support this bill in the House and reserve our position in the Senate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 mixed
“This Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025 has to have the meat put on the bone so that the government will own the responsibility to get out into regional areas to have discussions with the community and say, 'Where did you use to get reception that you no longer get reception?' and at the very least match what they had, because they don't have it. What I have seen in following this is that every office in regional Australia becomes a lightning rod for telephone complaints. What I have seen is that when you say to them, 'This area that you used to get reception in no longer gets reception,' they come out with the greatest weasel words. They say, 'In the past that was just fortuitous reception.' It's like you were just lucky it happened. Luck had nothing to do with it. They had reception and now they don't.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
4 speakers · 4 support
“I support this bill as an important step towards truly universal telecommunications in Australia. The UOMO acknowledges that new technologies, including low-Earth-orbit satellites, are expanding how we connect and that our embrace of these new technologies must benefit all Australians, not just those who are well off. However, I remain concerned that, at least initially, the UOMO won't be truly universal and will favour those with access to the latest smartphones, disadvantaging vulnerable Australians and those doing it tough. So, while I commend this bill to the House, I will continue to advocate for an outdoor mobile obligation that genuinely, truly serves all Australians wherever they live and whatever their means.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Now I know that, in my time as the member, we have been able to get—and lobbied very, very hard to get—more mobile coverage across our area. But, truly, regional Australia deserves the same equitable mobile phone coverage—I mean, we've all had mobiles now for decades. It's hard to believe that so much of Australia is still left with absolutely no service at all. I do support this bill, but I do support it very cautiously.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“My hope is that this bill will hold the telecommunications providers to account and that the communities of Coasters Retreat, Mackerel Beach, The Basin and Narrabeen will finally have the mobile phone reception coverage that they deserve and can rely on. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Lastly, I can give a personal example. I enjoy doing long-distance trail events, often in very remote areas of national parks. I have taken it upon myself to actually buy a mini GPS satellite device to ensure I am trackable and can be contactable by family. But that is not something that is the norm. That is not something that people in regional or remote communities should be having to do. There should be this underlying basis of essential infrastructure when it comes to mobile coverage. So I will support this legislation. As I said, I will support the amendment from the member for Indi. But I want to be very clear to the government that this has to work in practice. This can't just be legislation to look like you're addressing a problem but not actually in practice meaningfully changing mobile coverage to ensure all communities have access to triple zero.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills
Scrutiny Digest 2 of 2026
Considered by scrutiny committee (4 Feb 2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 2 of 2026
APH bill page notesSenate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee
Report tabled 14 May 2026
Referred to Committee (5 Mar 2026): Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee; Committee report (14 May 2026)
APH bill page notes