Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation)

Current status

This bill is currently before Parliament.

Policy area

Transport & communications

What does this bill do?

People outdoors would gain a baseline right to reasonably available voice calls and text messages across Australia.

Why was it introduced?

The government says mobile phones are now essential for safety and everyday life, but the existing universal service rules cover fixed voice services and payphones rather than mobiles. Traditional networks serve areas where about 99 per cent of Australians live and work, yet cover only one-third of the landmass. Across the remaining two-thirds—around five million square kilometres—a person cannot make a Triple Zero call using traditional mobile services. The government says emerging satellite-to-phone technology can close much of that gap and that legislating now will stop rollout decisions being left entirely to industry.

Broader context

Australia’s longstanding Universal Service Obligation guaranteed fixed voice services and payphones, but mobile phones became essential while terrestrial networks covered only about one-third of the landmass, leaving much of regional and remote Australia without outdoor access to Triple Zero. After the 2024 Regional Telecommunications Review considered reform options, the government announced in February 2025 that mobile services would enter the universal-services framework; Hon Anika Wells MP introduced the bill on 27 November 2025, the House passed it on 9 September 2026, and the outdoor obligation is planned to begin on 1 December 2027.

Key criticism

Melissa McIntosh (Liberal) argued that “reasonably available” and “equitable” were too unclear to enforce. She said the end-of-2027 timetable could raise unrealistic expectations because large-scale satellite-to-phone services were not yet fully deployed. She also warned that many existing phones may be incompatible, leaving consumers to buy new devices, and said the bill did not expressly require universal access to Triple Zero.

Who supported it?

Hon Anika Wells MP introduced this bill. Supportive speeches so far have come from Labor, One Nation, Liberal Party, Greens, some crossbench members.

Introduced in House 27 Nov 2025
Passed House 09 Sept 2026
At second reading in Senate 14 Sept 2026
Not yet law —

Did it become law?

Not yet

Final passage

Recorded vote so far

1 recorded amendment or procedural vote was found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Days since introduction

313 days

Updated 06 Oct 2026.

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. People outdoors would gain a baseline right to reasonably available voice calls and text messages across Australia. “Outdoors” excludes buildings, vehicles, aircraft, vessels, underground and underwater locations. Coverage need not be provided where an exception applies, including the Australian Radio Quiet Zone in Western Australia.

  2. Telstra, Optus and TPG would each have to meet the obligation across the general Australian coverage area from 1 December 2027. The minister can start it earlier or postpone it by 12 months up to three times, after consulting the three companies and considering technical, market and consumer issues. The minister can also split it into separate obligations—such as voice and text—and assign different providers, starting times or coverage areas.

  3. The scheme does not promise a signal everywhere. A service must be available for people to use in practice, including through an affordable plan and compatible device. Satellite connections may require a clear view of the sky, while technical limits, outages and other specified circumstances can affect whether coverage is reasonably available. The minister may set standards covering the affordability of the required services.

  4. During an emergency, the minister may make rules requiring temporary disaster roamingEmergency access to a mobile network other than the customer’s usual network.. This would let affected people use another provider’s network for calls and texts. Rules could cover timing, minimum performance, information sharing, wholesale prices and reporting, but roaming is not automatic unless the minister makes those rules.

  5. For services delivered under the outdoor obligation, the minister may set enforceable requirements covering price, reliability, call quality, text-message performance, fault repairs, congestion and customer information. When setting minimum fault-repair targets, the minister must consider whether the timing is reasonable for the service’s location, including regional, rural and remote areas.

  6. A separate set of powers would operate from the bill’s commencement, before the outdoor obligation’s default start date. These powers let the minister set enforceable standards, rules and minimum performance targets for carriers and mobile service providers generally, covering matters such as reliability, call and text quality, fault repairs, congestion and customer information. Unlike the outdoor-obligation standards, these general powers are not intended to regulate retail prices.

  7. The outdoor obligation applies to services sold to customers. It does not force terrestrial network or satellite operators to supply wholesale services to mobile companies. Wholesale accessOne telecommunications company supplying network services to another. instead remains covered by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s existing powers, including powers to set price and non-price terms for declared services.

  8. If a provider expects it can no longer meet its obligation, it must generally warn the minister and the Australian Communications and Media Authority at least 12 months beforehand. If that is not reasonably practical, notice is due as soon as reasonably practical and no later than 10 business days after the time, if any, when the provider ceases to be able to fulfil the obligation. The regulator may also require a departing provider to tell customers when it is leaving and identify the replacement provider.

  9. The scheme supports Triple Zero rather than creating a separate emergency-call requirement. Existing emergency-call rules already apply to public mobile voice services, including voice services supplied under this obligation. The government can also use the existing public-interest telecommunications account for contracts, grants, research, standards and public information supporting the scheme.

  10. The bill also removes restrictions that could prevent the minister from appointing or changing providers under the existing universal service rules for fixed voice services and payphones until earlier appointments had first been revoked. The change is intended to allow providers or contracts to overlap where needed while services are transferred.

Show source excerpts
  1. 12F What is the universal outdoor mobile obligation? (1) For the purposes of this Act, the universal outdoor mobile obligation is the obligation to ensure that mobile coverage is reasonably available outdoors to all people in Australia on an equitable basis. (2) The obligation mentioned in subsection (1) includes the obligation to supply each kind of designated mobile telecommunications service such that the service is reasonably available outdoors throughout Australia. (3) An obligation does not arise under subsection (1) or (2): (a) in relation to a location that is not in the general Au
    Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) introduced text
  2. 12G What is an outdoor mobile obligation? (1) Unless the Minister makes a determination under subsection (2) of this section, the obligation referred to in subsection 12F(1) is the outdoor mobile obligation. (2) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine the outdoor mobile obligations by dividing the universal outdoor mobile obligation into 2 or more outdoor mobile obligations. Example: The Minister could divide the universal outdoor mobile obligation by reference to each kind of designated mobile telecommunications service. (3) The determination must also specify, in respect o
    Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) introduced text
  3. (4) Schedule 1, item 16, page 9 (line 25) to page 9 (line 27), omit subsection 12H(2), substitute: (2) A designated mobile telecommunications service is available outdoors at a location if the service is available in a manner that enables end-users to access and use the service in practice, including: (a) the technical capability of the service to be used at a location; and (b) the affordability of the service for end-users; and (c) the accessibility of the service, including the availability of compatible devices and service plans necessary to use the service. [affordable access] (5) Sc
    Proposed amendment 2: Detail - Crossbench
  4. (7) Schedule 1, item 16, page 18 (after line 5), after section 12R, insert: 12RA Temporary disaster roaming (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, make rules requiring a primary universal outdoor mobile provider to provide temporary disaster roaming to end-users in an affected area during an emergency period. (2) Rules under subsection (1) may prescribe any or all of the following: (a) the definition of affected area and emergency period, including by reference to an instrument made under any other Act; (b) timeframes for temporary disaster roaming; (c) minimum service performa
    Proposed amendment 2: Detail - Crossbench
  5. Subdivision C—Universal outdoor mobile obligation standards, benchmarks and rules 12Q Standards (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine standards to be complied with by primary universal outdoor mobile providers in relation to any or all of the following matters relating to designated mobile telecommunications services supplied, or proposed to be supplied, in fulfilment of the universal outdoor mobile obligation: (a) the terms and conditions (whether or not relating to price or a method of ascertaining price) of the supply of a designated mobile telecommunications service
    Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) introduced text
  6. Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 20 Section 4 • The ACMA may make performance standards to be complied with by carriage service providers in relation to customer service. • The Minister may make standards to be complied with by carriers and carriage service providers in relation to mobile telecommunications services. 21 After Part 5 125A Simplified outline of this Part The Minister may determine standards, set benchmarks and make rules to be complied with by carriers and carriage service providers in relation to mobile telecommunications services.
    Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) introduced text
  7. Wholesale matters The UOMO is a retail obligation on the three national MNOs, and any further providers that are designated in the future. It does not seek to mandate the provision of terrestrial or D2D mobile services at the wholesale level. This is because the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) already has powers under Part XIC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 to intervene in wholesale access markets to enable greater competition. Under Part XIC, telecommunications service providers can be required to provide access to declared wholesale services to their competit
    Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) explanatory memorandum
  8. 12N Notification obligations of primary universal outdoor mobile providers (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is a primary universal outdoor mobile provider in respect of a specified outdoor mobile obligation for a specified outdoor mobile coverage area; and (b) the person becomes aware that it is likely that the person will cease to be able to fulfil the outdoor mobile obligation for the outdoor mobile coverage area. (2) The person must: (a) give written notice of the matter to: (i) the Minister; and (ii) the ACMA; and (i) if it is reasonably practicable for the notice to be gi
    Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) introduced text
  9. The ability to make standards is essential to ensure that the government can respond if the market fails to deliver quality or equitable mobile services. This is consistent with arrangements under the existing universal services framework. While the UOMO provides the underlying framework for baseline connectivity that can support triple 0 access, the bill does not explicitly reference access to an emergency call service as a requirement for the mobile operators to meet the bill's objectives. This is because there is a longstanding requirement for providers of public mobile telecommunications
    Minister's second reading speech
  10. Items 13-15 amend the existing USO regime to make technical corrections and remove redundant sections. Item 13 amends existing section 12A, which sets out how primary universal service providers (PUSPs) may be determined. Paragraph 12A(2) currently provides that the Minister may determine: different PUSPs in respect of different service obligations for the same service area, and the same person as the PUSP for one or more service areas in respect of one or more service obligations. The section is intended to provide two alternative choices, but the use of ‘and’ at the end of paragraph 12A(
    Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) explanatory memorandum

Broader context for this bill

Australia’s longstanding Universal Service Obligation guaranteed fixed voice services and payphones, but mobile phones became essential while terrestrial networks covered only about one-third of the landmass, leaving much of regional and remote Australia without outdoor access to Triple Zero. After the 2024 Regional Telecommunications Review considered reform options, the government announced in February 2025 that mobile services would enter the universal-services framework; Hon Anika Wells MP introduced the bill on 27 November 2025, the House passed it on 9 September 2026, and the outdoor obligation is planned to begin on 1 December 2027.

  1. 2024

    Regional Telecommunications Review considers mobile coverage reform

    The review considered options for reforming longstanding universal telecommunications arrangements, including how mobile services might fit within them.

    Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) explanatory memorandum ↗
  2. February 2025

    Government announces mobile universal service obligation

    The government announced it would bring mobile services into the universal-services framework and require major operators to provide outdoor baseline coverage across Australia.

    Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) explanatory memorandum ↗
  3. 18 Sept 2025

    Government publishes draft outdoor mobile obligation legislation

    The draft legislation set out a proposed legal framework for ensuring basic outdoor voice and SMS coverage across Australia.

    Department of Infrastructure ↗
  4. 27 Nov 2025

    Hon Anika Wells MP introduces the bill

    The bill was presented in the House of Representatives and read a first time, beginning its parliamentary consideration.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  5. 09 Sept 2026

    House passes the bill

    The House agreed to the bill at third reading after accepting a crossbench amendment, allowing it to proceed to the Senate.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  6. 14 Sept 2026

    Senate begins considering the bill

    The bill was introduced and read a first time in the Senate, opening the next stage of parliamentary consideration.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 27 Nov 2025

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 27 Nov 2025

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Scrutiny of Bills review 04 Feb 2026

Considered by scrutiny committee (04/02/2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 2 of 2026

Scrutiny Digest 2 of 2026

APH bill page notes
Second reading debate 02 Mar 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Environment and Communications review 05 Mar 2026

Referred to Committee (05/03/2026): Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee; Committee report (14/05/2026)

Report tabled 14 May 2026

APH bill page notes
Second reading debate 11 Mar 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate 28 May 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Sent to Federation Chamber for debate 11 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Referred to Federation Chamber

Federation Chamber debate 11 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate

Returned from Federation Chamber 09 Sept 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Reported from Federation Chamber

House second reading agreed 09 Sept 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House agreed to amendments 09 Sept 2026

The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.

Consideration in detail debate

House third reading agreed 09 Sept 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 14 Sept 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 14 Sept 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

The main case against this bill

Melissa McIntosh (Liberal) argued that “reasonably available” and “equitable” were too unclear to enforce. She said the end-of-2027 timetable could raise unrealistic expectations because large-scale satellite-to-phone services were not yet fully deployed. She also warned that many existing phones may be incompatible, leaving consumers to buy new devices, and said the bill did not expressly require universal access to Triple Zero.

The government said existing emergency-call rules already apply to voice services supplied under the scheme and that the communications regulator can investigate breaches and impose sanctions and penalties. The agreed crossbench changes also made affordability, compatible devices and practical access explicit, required attention to regional fault-repair times and allowed rules for temporary disaster roamingEmergency access to a mobile network other than the customer’s usual network..

Recorded votes

Amendments at a glance

Amendments grouped by chamber. Expand any amendment to see the party breakdown or, where it passed on the voices, how that works.

House

Defeated

Send the outdoor mobile coverage bill to a Senate inquiry

Aye 52 No 86

Defeated 52 to 86. Support came from Liberal, Nationals, Community Strong Australia, One Nation, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor.

09 Sept 2026

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 86
Liberal 24 / 0
Nationals 13 / 0
Independent 8 / 0
Community Strong Australia 2 / 0
One Nation 2 / 0
Greens 1 / 0
Centre Alliance 1 / 0
Katter's Australian Party 1 / 0
Carried

Require affordable and practical mobile access

This amendment would change the bill to account for affordability, compatible devices, service plans, temporary disaster roamingEmergency access to a mobile network other than the customer’s usual network., explanations of legislative instruments and service reliability when delivering universal outdoor mobile coverage.

09 Sept 2026

This amendment would change the bill to account for affordability, compatible devices, service plans, temporary disaster roamingEmergency access to a mobile network other than the customer’s usual network., explanations of legislative instruments and service reliability when delivering universal outdoor mobile coverage.

Passed on the voices

The chamber agreed to this amendment without a counted vote — the presiding officer judged the ayes louder than the noes, and no member called for a division.

These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Anika Wells

Australian Labor Party • MP 27 Nov 2025

Wells supports the bill, arguing it will modernise universal service rules by requiring national mobile operators to provide reasonable outdoor voice and SMS coverage across Australia, improving equitable access and public safety.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead opposing voice Opposes

Andrew Wallace

Liberal Party of Australia • MP 11 Mar 2026

Wallace opposes the bill in its current form and supports a reasoned amendment seeking a Senate inquiry, arguing that its reliance on unproven technology, vague obligations and inadequate emergency and consumer protections must be fixed before passage.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

David Littleproud

The Nationals • MP 28 May 2026

David Littleproud supports the bill as a positive step for improving telecommunications, but argues it should also require mobile towers to be maintained and strengthen protections for rural and remote communities.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

Helen Haines

Independent • MP 02 Mar 2026

Helen Haines supports the bill as an important step toward universal mobile coverage, but argues it must be strengthened to ensure affordable access, disaster roaming, transparent exclusions and timely fault repairs so vulnerable and regional Australians are not left behind.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

19 speakers · 19 support

  1. Alice Jordan-Baird Jordan-Baird supports the bill because it will require mobile operators to provide baseline outdoor voice and SMS coverage across Australia, improving access to emergency services while creating enforceable and flexible industry obligations.
    “We know that this legislation is the right decision because we know it's what rural and remote communities need right now across Australia. Extensive consultation informed this legislation with industry, consumer representatives, state and local governments as well as telecommunications stakeholders. That included mobile network providers, consumer advocacy groups and regional representatives. It's a collaborative process that has helped ensure the framework is practical, flexible and focused on public outcomes. It's been designed with the communities it will serve. The rural and remote communities have been at the absolute forefront of this thinking. It's so important because, at its core, connectivity is about safety, about equitable access to services and about better access to emergency services and support. This is exactly what this bill is focused on.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 28 May 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Fiona Phillips Phillips supports the bill because its nationwide outdoor voice and SMS coverage requirements would improve connectivity and help people in regional and disaster-prone areas contact emergency services.
    “I rise today to support the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025 and to applaud the Albanese Labor government's commitment to strengthening the resilience of Australia's telecommunications service. The Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation will require national mobile carriers Telstra, Optus and TPG to provide access to SMS and voice coverage for Australians nationwide, almost everywhere you can see the sky.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Dan Repacholi Dan Repacholi strongly supports the bill because it would give regional Australians more reliable outdoor voice and text coverage, improving safety, emergency access and connectivity in places where mobile towers are impractical.
    “It is not about waiting for perfection; it is about taking a big step forward. The vision is clear: a country where you can step outside, look up and connect, no matter where you live, no matter where you work, no matter where you travel. For the Hunter, that vision matters. That's why I support the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025, and that's why I commend it to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Lisa Chesters Chesters strongly supports the bill because it would guarantee basic outdoor voice and text coverage, improving safety and connectivity for regional Australians who currently face persistent mobile black spots.
    “As I have said, this bill that's before us should be embraced by all in this place, particularly regional members. It establishes for the first time in our history a universal outdoor mobile obligation. It says that, in our country, if you can see the sky, you should be able to access voice and mobile phones. For many in my part of the world, that is a game changer. The idea that you can drive throughout the region—my own region—and not get the SOS is something that many would welcome, knowing that on those catastrophic days you'll still be able to receive text messages and the early warning. That you'll still be able to receive voice calls is a game changer. Knowing that, if your daughter or son is driving home via Eppalock and something happens, they'll be able contact you—these things make a difference. They will ensure that all of us have the same opportunity as others in other parts of the country. I commend the bill and the reforms to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Ash Ambihaipahar Ambihaipahar supports the bill because it creates a legal obligation for equitable baseline outdoor mobile coverage and replaces an outdated landline-focused model with a flexible framework that can evolve with technology.
    “A mobile phone is now how many Australians call for help, receive emergency information, access transport updates, produce a digital licence, make payments, contact family and interact with essential services. The law needs to recognise that reality. For communities across the country and for the constituents in Carlton and in my whole electorate, this bill sends a clear message: reliable mobile coverage matters and the standard we accept must keep rising. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 28 May 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Julie-Ann Campbell Campbell supports the bill because it would require mobile operators to provide baseline outdoor coverage, using satellite technology where towers cannot reach, improving safety and emergency communications across rural and remote Australia.
    “As I've said, this bill reflects the Albanese Labor government's foundational belief that every Australian, regardless of where they live, should have access to a basic level of mobile connectivity. Whether someone is facing a natural disaster stuck on a country road, hurt while working on a property or lost in remote bushland, the universal outdoor mobile obligation bill is designed to make sure mobile services are there at the moments when it matters the most. For people in rural, regional and remote parts of Australia, leveraging direct-to-device satellite technology from low-Earth-orbit satellites will translate to greater safety. In modern Australia, this baseline requirement is critical.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Trish Cook Cook strongly supports the bill, arguing that universal outdoor mobile coverage will improve emergency access, close regional connectivity gaps and support economic growth by requiring mobile operators to provide baseline coverage wherever reasonably possible.
    “This is a landmark reform. It is a bold step forward that embraces the future and puts people first, and I'm immensely proud to support this legislation. I'm proud to be part of the government that is finally delivering the connectivity that regional Australia deserves, because Labor understands the regions. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Jess Teesdale Teesdale supports the bill because it would make basic outdoor voice and text services broadly available across Australia, improving safety and equitable access for regional and remote communities.
    “When I return to the story I began with, I think about the waiting, the uncertainty—that distance between need and help. A simple text could have changed that experience for me completely. Being able to make a call when you need to is not a luxury anymore. It is a baseline expectation in a modern nation. This bill updates our laws to reflect that expectation. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  9. Tom French French supports the bill because it creates an enforceable baseline of outdoor mobile voice and text coverage, improving emergency access, safety and connectivity across remote and regional Australia.
    “If you're standing outdoors in open sky in Australia and it's technically feasible to connect you, then that connection should be reasonably available. For a country of our size, our ambition and our economic footprint, that is not excessive. It is sensible and it is overdue. For those reasons, I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Emma Comer Comer supports the bill because it would expand baseline outdoor voice and text coverage into areas beyond the practical reach of mobile towers, improving safety and reducing the digital divide while allowing adjustments for technical and market constraints.
    “Our vision is clear. We are not sitting back waiting for technology to evolve to its own timetable. We're acting early to ensure that Australians benefit from emerging technologies as quickly and as equitably as possible. Improving coverage is a key concern for communities and a priority of this government. The UOMO ensures that almost anywhere Australians can see the sky, they will have access to outdoor mobile voice and text services. It means that when you look up, you can connect. No matter where you live or what you do, you deserve that connection.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  11. Rowan Holzberger Holzberger supports the bill as a practical first step toward wider mobile coverage, arguing that reliable communications are essential for safety, emergency response and economic opportunity, while stressing that telecommunications companies must be held accountable.
    “The frustration that my community feels and that I feel by having substandard telecommunications in the 21st century means that the industry needs to do better. The government is making sure that they are accountable. This bill goes towards that, and works in a constructive way to make sure that all Australians have access to the services that are essential in the 21st century. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  12. Kristy McBain McBain supports the bill because it will require major mobile carriers to provide nationwide outdoor voice and SMS coverage, improving connectivity and public safety in regional, rural and remote areas, particularly during disasters.
    “There is no doubt in my mind that our telco providers are beholden to their shareholders. They are for-profit organisations. But they also have an obligation to provide services to every community across the country, and this is one way that our government wants to hold those telcos to account, to say, 'You need to do better and you need to do better for every Australian, not just Australians in our cities.' That's why today I'm rising to speak in support of the Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation—because it establishes a new framework to create this obligation. It complements the existing universal service obligation, which applies to fixed voice services and payphones—which are also incredibly important right across our community—but this is a significant and important reform that will bring mobile services within that universal services framework. More Australians now have mobile devices than have landlines, so it's important that as government and as parliament we ask the telcos to make sure that they are providing universal services to mobile phones.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  13. Claire Clutterham Clutterham supports the bill as an important modernisation that will expand basic outdoor mobile coverage, particularly in regional and remote areas, and improve public safety and access to emergency services.
    “This bill, which creates the universal outdoor mobile obligation, will change that by establishing a framework to create this obligation, which complements the existing USO. In short, this is a significant and important reform that will bring mobile services within the universal services framework.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  14. David Moncrieff Moncrieff strongly supports the bill, arguing that its enforceable, technology-neutral mobile coverage obligation will close dangerous connectivity gaps and give Australians access to essential voice, messaging and emergency services wherever they are outdoors.
    “This bill starts keeping the promise properly, with a clear obligation and technology that can actually deliver it. This bill says that no Australian anywhere should look up, see the sky and find a phone call out of reach. To the people of Bundeena and Maianbar, to hikers in the Royal National Park, to the drivers of Heathcote Road and to every constituent in Hughes: this bill is about addressing your concerns and giving you peace of mind. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  15. Tracey Roberts Roberts strongly supports the bill because it would guarantee reliable outdoor mobile coverage, improving safety, business productivity and fair access to essential services, particularly in fast-growing outer suburbs and regional communities.
    “It's 2026. Australians have every right to expect that, when they step outside their home, they will have mobile reception. It shouldn't depend on which side of a postcode line you live on or whether your suburb was built five years ago or fifty years ago. This bill draws that line clearly. It says, 'We are one connected nation.' Our communities have asked for action. The Albanese Labor government has listened. And now, through this bill, we are delivering. I am proud to support the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025, and I commend it to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  16. Susan Templeman Templeman strongly supports the bill, arguing that satellite-backed outdoor mobile coverage will help close the digital divide and let Australians make potentially life-saving calls or send messages in emergencies where conventional mobile towers cannot provide service.
    “The UOMO is a critical part of our comprehensive work to reduce the digital divide, increase productivity, support economic growth and meet Australia's growing demand for data and seamless connectivity. I know a decade ago it was almost impossible to work from home in many parts of my electorate because of the quality of ADSL. The NBN, as it came online, improved that, step by step. The increase in fibre to the home has been a game changer for people in the Blue Mountains and Hawkesbury in being able to run their businesses effectively and successfully from home. I know I tried to do it in the early 2000 with dial-up, followed quickly by the first version of ADSL. It was hard as a small business having to manage that communication side and the volume of material that you could send. So I look back on those days and see how far we have come, particularly thanks to the NBN and the expansion of the mobile phone towers that I fought for for so many years. This is the next step—to make sure that, when people go outdoors into the wild almost anywhere in Australia, if they can see the sky they can make a voice or text call. Our vision is absolutely clear. This is about making Australia the most connected continent in the world. I'm very pleased to support this legislation as a key part of bringing telecommunications law into the 21st century and beyond.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  17. Matt Smith Matt Smith strongly supports the bill, arguing that universal outdoor mobile coverage will improve safety, health care, education and economic opportunity in remote and regional communities.
    “With this bill and with the opportunities presented, if you can see the sky, you'll have mobile coverage—from Cairns, where there are still dead spots, right the way to the Torres Strait, where, as we've recently heard, mobile reception is critical for our border security. The Torres Strait Islanders like to record any illegal incursions and send back to Border Watch. They will be able to do that more efficiently in between the islands to make that our borders are safe, to make sure that our communities are safe. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  18. Anne Urquhart Urquhart supports the bill, saying its satellite-based obligation will greatly expand outdoor voice and text coverage in remote Australia, improve road safety and provide more reliable communications during natural disasters.
    “The Albanese Labor government is delivering a better and more connected future, not just for regional and remote Tasmania but for all of Australia. Labor's vision is clear: we want Australia to be the most connected continent in the world so that, no matter where you live or what you do, you can connect. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

17 speakers · 18 contributions · 10 support · 2 oppose · 2 mixed · 3 unclear

  1. Julian Leeser Julian Leeser supports the bill's goal of improving mobile coverage but says its passage should depend on Senate scrutiny showing that it will deliver affordable, reliable and safe service in practice, particularly for peri-urban communities.
    “My approach is straightforward. I support the objective of better mobile services. I support dragging telcos into a position where they meet the expectations of ordinary Australian families who do the right thing and pay their bills month in and month out. That's why this bill needs to be closely scrutinised by the Senate committee, because there are serious questions about this legislation—about whether it works in practice for communities like mine. I want to encourage everyone in my community who's had a mobile phone issue to make a submission to the Senate committee, to put your issues and challenges on the record so we can ensure that this bill is fit for purpose.”

    Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Simon Kennedy 2 contributions Simon Kennedy welcomes elements of the bill but does not state whether he will support its passage.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Simon Kennedy on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Simon Kennedy supports the bill because it would help close dangerous mobile black spots, but says its success will depend on clear obligations, realistic implementation, affordable and compatible services, and fewer regulatory barriers.

    “Reform must be grounded in technical realism, economic responsibility and rigorous oversight. I support the intention of this bill. It is good legislation, and we do need to close these mobile blackspots, but the devil will be in the detail and in the implementation. Australians and residents of the Sutherland Shire should not have to put up with blackspots as they go from their train to their work in the middle of downtown Sydney.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 28 May 2026

    Simon Kennedy welcomes elements of the bill but does not state whether he will support its passage. He calls for greater parliamentary scrutiny and a credible delivery plan, citing risks involving emergency calls, device compatibility, enforcement, pricing and mobile black spots.

    “There is some structural reform in this bill, and structural reform of this scale warrants comprehensive parliamentary examination before it's locked into law. We want to make sure the definitions, the enforcement mechanisms, the spectrum allocation, the pricing implications and the device compatibility all get the detailed interrogation they deserve. Most importantly, we want to see how this will be physically delivered, developed, scrutinised and put into action—so we are calling for more scrutiny on this bill. Given the government's record on 3G and triple zero, due diligence on this isn't optional; it's essential.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  3. Mary Aldred Aldred says the coalition supports the bill's stronger consumer safeguards, enforcement powers and penalties, while arguing that consumer protection must also deliver reliable mobile coverage and emergency access for regional Australians.
    “I rise to speak on the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025 and the amendment. The coalition is pleased to support it. The bill establishes a registration scheme for carriage service providers, gives ACMA greater visibility over the estimated 1,500 operators in the Australian telecommunications market, makes industry codes directly enforceable, and removes the existing two-step enforcement process. Importantly, it also substantially increases the maximum penalty for breaches of industry codes and standards from $250,000 to $10 million, with a scope for even greater penalties depending on the benefit obtained or the turnover of the provider. These are significant reforms. When we are talking about compliance with rules governing triple zero, cybersecurity and scams, there must be consequences when providers fail to meet their obligations.”

    Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 11 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Tom Venning Tom Venning supports expanding outdoor mobile coverage but says the bill leaves major practical questions unanswered, including enforceable standards, device compatibility, competition and reliance on overseas satellite providers.
    “The bill as it stands leaves so many questions unanswered. Domestic carriers may bear the primary regulatory burden, but they are going to be heavily dependent on international satellite-providing companies whose pricing models and deployment schedules are entirely outside Australia's direct control, like Starlink and Amazon. We must ensure that the new obligation strengthens competition rather than inadvertently handing the entire market over to one or two global giants. Telecommunications policy must anticipate these impacts rather than just reacting to them after damage is done and competition has been crushed.”

    Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Alison Penfold Penfold supports the goal of wider outdoor mobile coverage but says the bill should undergo further scrutiny because it does not ensure the service will be reliable, affordable or workable and fails to address existing regional telecommunications problems.
    “Australia's geography makes connectivity both challenging and critical. While new technologies provide an opportunity to ensure that our regions have access to telecommunications services, they must be matched by genuine reliability, not just promises. So, in conclusion, I support further scrutiny of this bill by referral to a Senate committee. Such diligence is essential for essential infrastructure such as this bill proposes.”

    The Nationals • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Andrew Willcox Willcox supports the bill's goal of extending outdoor mobile coverage, but says it needs close scrutiny to ensure the satellite-based system is reliable, affordable, enforceable and compatible with older phones, especially for emergency calls.
    “We're here today to discuss the universal mobile obligation. The coalition supports the goal of extending voice and text coverage outdoors across more of the country. Improved connectivity for regional Australians is critical and very, very important. However, the credibility of any reform rests not on the lofty aspirations of the minister proclaiming what he does in a press release. It needs to be on the detail, the realism and the actual implications on the ground. This bill must be deeply scrutinised, because if there's one thing we know about this government it's that they're the masters of the headline but they're not very good on the delivery.”

    The Nationals • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Michael McCormack McCormack welcomes the bill as a way to improve vital mobile coverage in regional and remote Australia, particularly for emergencies and farm work, but says Labor must implement it fairly and turn its promises into infrastructure rather than favouring Labor-held electorates.
    “I hear Labor members talking about coverage in 99 per cent of where people live, and I look forward to that. I will be making sure that I keep in a folder all of the contributions that Labor members make to quote back at them in the future, because I welcome what is being proposed here.”

    The Nationals • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Melissa McIntosh McIntosh supports the bill's goal of universal outdoor mobile coverage and does not oppose its second reading, but calls for a Senate inquiry and possible amendments to address uncertain obligations, emergency access, device compatibility, costs and enforceability.
    “Regional Australians have long felt the frustration of black spots that linger year after year. They know what it is like to climb onto the roof of a ute to get just one bar of signal. They know what it means to lose service just when it matters most. The coalition has always understood that reality. We have consistently invested in mobile black spot programs, regional connectivity measures and infrastructure that improves resilience. We believe Australians should not be disadvantaged because of their postcode. Connectivity equity is a core principle. In concept, extending a framework to outdoor mobile coverage for voice and text is a very worthy and necessary goal, but measures to give effect to this goal must work. They must genuinely expand coverage, and they must do this in a practical, reliable and affordable way. But significant questions still need to be answered.”

    Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  9. Sam Birrell Birrell supports the bill's goal of expanding outdoor mobile coverage and expects it to pass, but says the government must ensure the rollout is practical, reliable and affordable, with enforceable standards, device compatibility and rigorous oversight.
    “We don't want the one-size-fits-all outcome for communications; we want to use all the technology—mobile phone towers, direct to device, low orbit satellites. Technology is moving fast in this area, and whoever's in government will have to keep up. So you have our support for the concept; we just want to see it deliver better outcomes on the ground. As the member for Riverina said in his speech earlier—and apparently he's going to keep a folder of all the presentations by Labor members talking about how great this is going to be—it's great to talk about it here in the House of Representatives. It'll pass. It'll pass the Senate, I believe. Then it will be about the deliver and whether we actually get those better outcomes. We'll be holding the government to account on that.”

    The Nationals • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Terry Young Terry Young supports the bill's aim of improving mobile connectivity, but doubts it will deliver meaningful change because it does not ensure towers are built, protect vulnerable users with older handsets, or impose clear coverage obligations on telecommunications companies.
    “I support the intent of the bill, because I want mobile connectivity, but I sincerely doubt we will see any change. I think this will just be another Labor headline and it won't have any substance. But we live in hope.”

    Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  11. Anne Webster Anne Webster says the bill falls well short of delivering universal outdoor mobile coverage and calls for detailed Senate committee scrutiny, arguing it contains escape clauses and fails to address roaming, emergency access, consumer protections and terrestrial network deficiencies.
    “This bill must go to a Senate committee. That is what the coalition will be calling for. Structural reform of this scale warrants comprehensive parliamentary examination. Given the government's record on 3G and triple zero, due diligence is not optional; it's essential. The coalition is serious about genuine reform that brings the USO into the 21st century and addresses complex issues, not just headline grabs and political wins.”

    The Nationals • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  12. Jamie Chaffey Jamie Chaffey opposes the bill, arguing that it promises universal mobile coverage using technology that is not yet fully available, depends on compatible handsets and cannot contact triple zero, while giving the minister broad power to allow exceptions.
    “In one short document, we've gone from universal coverage to coverage if the technology is invented to coverage if the technology is invented, providing you have the right handset, to coverage if the technology is invented, you have the right handset and the minister thinks it's a good idea. Is it any wonder this Labor government has lost the trust of those in regional Australia, many of whom are trying to run a business and a family with one hand tied behind their backs and the other up in the air trying to get a signal?”

    The Nationals • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  13. Llew O'Brien Llew O'Brien supports the bill's goal of improving outdoor mobile coverage but does not clearly say whether he will vote for it.
    “While I recognise the intent of the bill and welcome the requirement for major telcos to provide reasonable and equitable outdoor mobile coverage, I have concerns about whether the bill as drafted will actually deliver regional Australians the services that they need and deserve. The government claims that the universal obligation will provide coverage almost everywhere, yet it hasn't been clear about what this means, and who will be left out, or about the new technologies that we'll really rely on that have not been widely trialled, tested or proven in Australia.”

    The Nationals • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  14. Aaron Violi Aaron Violi supports the bill's goal of extending mobile coverage and says his concern is not with the legislation itself, but he doubts the minister can deliver it effectively and promises close scrutiny of the rollout.
    “The intent is right. We absolutely want to provide coverage for everyone. But, unfortunately, like so many things that this government does, the intent might be good, but the delivery has to be there. The concern I have with this legislation is not with the legislation itself—as I said, the intent is there—but the minister who has carriage of this legislation has a track record of not being able to deliver when it comes to important legislation. We saw this minister, when they were the Minister for Aged Care, fail to support the aged-care industry and aged-care residents. They needed to be reshuffled across to communications. We've seen that failure when it came to the triple zero debacle and the 3G debacle. We've seen that with the social media ban—a big announcement. We saw them fly to New York and spend over $100,000 of taxpayer money for a five- or six-minute speech to claim all the glory of the legislation. Speak to any high-school kid, though. I've got a son in year 7, and he has said to me that all his mates are on social media. I still valiantly keep him off social media. Let's hope he actually listens to his dad.”

    Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 28 May 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  15. Tim Wilson Tim Wilson supports the bill as an important way to ensure Australians have reliable mobile access, particularly in growing, higher-density communities where development has left residents with poor telecommunications services.
    “I know that the Minister for Housing is completely ignorant of how people live their lives in the 21st century, and, as a consequence, she doesn't understand what she seeks to wreak upon our communities. But some of us are very squarely focused on what people need, which is why the universal outdoor mobile obligation is such an important part of the conversation. We know that, when Australians have a big problem with being able to access services, there is a role for government, to make sure that we bridge the divide—but I realise that the Minister for Housing is now leaving the chamber in humiliation, because of the shrill responses we have heard. That's her choice. We're going to continue to focus on how we build the housing infrastructure we need to promote homeownership. We're going to continue to build the telecommunications and telephonic infrastructure we need to make sure that Australians can live their lives and live out the best of their lives. At the end of the day, the Labor Party only has one pathway forward—they want to control your lives as Australians. They want to be able to grab the artifice and the instruments of the state, dictate to people how to live their lives and control their lives, whether it's economically, socially or educationally, through every stage. Some of us are going to stand up against it. Some of us are going to stand up for empowering Australians, whether it's in homeownership or making sure people have access to telecommunications services.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Greens

1 speaker · 1 support

  1. Elizabeth Watson-Brown Watson-Brown says the Greens will support the bill in the House while reserving their Senate position, but argues it merely updates telecommunications rules without fixing inadequate coverage caused by Telstra's privatisation and private monopoly.
    “I rise to speak to the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025. For too long, Australians, including in my electorate, have put up with dreadful and patchy phone service due to privatisation, cost cutting and government neglect. Both Labor and Liberal governments have not addressed the inevitable failures resulting from Telstra's privatisation, and my constituents are paying the price. This bill updates the relevant legislation to better reflect modern technology but doesn't address the real issue at its heart: privatisation of what should be public services does not work. The Greens will support this bill in the House and reserve our position in the Senate.”

    Australian Greens • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

One Nation

1 speaker · 1 support

  1. Barnaby Joyce Barnaby Joyce supports the bill's mobile coverage obligation but says the government must turn it into a concrete responsibility to restore reliable reception in regional communities.
    “This Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025 has to have the meat put on the bone so that the government will own the responsibility to get out into regional areas to have discussions with the community and say, 'Where did you use to get reception that you no longer get reception?' and at the very least match what they had, because they don't have it. What I have seen in following this is that every office in regional Australia becomes a lightning rod for telephone complaints. What I have seen is that when you say to them, 'This area that you used to get reception in no longer gets reception,' they come out with the greatest weasel words. They say, 'In the past that was just fortuitous reception.' It's like you were just lucky it happened. Luck had nothing to do with it. They had reception and now they don't.”

    One Nation • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

4 speakers · 4 support

  1. Rebekha Sharkie Sharkie supports the bill, but cautiously, arguing that its framework may lack sufficient safeguards to deliver affordable and reliable coverage across regional Australia and must not replace continued investment in mobile towers.
    “Now I know that, in my time as the member, we have been able to get—and lobbied very, very hard to get—more mobile coverage across our area. But, truly, regional Australia deserves the same equitable mobile phone coverage—I mean, we've all had mobiles now for decades. It's hard to believe that so much of Australia is still left with absolutely no service at all. I do support this bill, but I do support it very cautiously.”

    Centre Alliance • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Sophie Scamps Sophie Scamps supports the bill because it would hold telecommunications providers accountable and improve reliable mobile coverage, especially for communities where poor reception threatens businesses, education, health care and emergency safety.
    “My hope is that this bill will hold the telecommunications providers to account and that the communities of Coasters Retreat, Mackerel Beach, The Basin and Narrabeen will finally have the mobile phone reception coverage that they deserve and can rely on. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Independent • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Zali Steggall Zali Steggall supports the bill because universal outdoor voice and SMS coverage is essential for emergency access, particularly in regional and remote Australia.
    “Lastly, I can give a personal example. I enjoy doing long-distance trail events, often in very remote areas of national parks. I have taken it upon myself to actually buy a mini GPS satellite device to ensure I am trackable and can be contactable by family. But that is not something that is the norm. That is not something that people in regional or remote communities should be having to do. There should be this underlying basis of essential infrastructure when it comes to mobile coverage. So I will support this legislation. As I said, I will support the amendment from the member for Indi. But I want to be very clear to the government that this has to work in practice. This can't just be legislation to look like you're addressing a problem but not actually in practice meaningfully changing mobile coverage to ensure all communities have access to triple zero.”

    Independent • MP • 02 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat