Higher spending, debt and inflation risk
Coalition critics said the bill bankrolls a budget that expands government spending, increases debt and risks making inflation and household costs worse rather than easing them.
This bill became law on Jun 30th, 2026.
Budget, tax & economy
The Act authorises $178.65 billion from the federal budget for the ordinary yearly running costs and services of government in 2026-27.
Government agencies need parliamentary authority to spend money on ordinary annual servicesThe routine yearly costs of running the Australian Government, which the Constitution requires to be put in a separate appropriation bill. in 2026-27, and the Constitution requires those appropriations to sit in a separate bill. The bill authorises $178.65 billion from the Consolidated Revenue FundThe main pool of Commonwealth public money from which this Act authorises spending to be drawn. and lets the Finance Minister release limited urgent extra funding.
Australia’s appropriation system already required ordinary annual government spending to be authorised by Parliament in a separate bill, with Portfolio Budget StatementsBudget documents that explain the outcomes, programs and agency funding behind the amounts listed in the appropriation bills. setting out the agency outcomes and programs behind the figures. Against the 2026-27 budget’s stated pressures on households and public services, Hon Dr Jim Chalmers MP introduced the bill to authorise $178.65 billion for ordinary annual servicesThe routine yearly costs of running the Australian Government, which the Constitution requires to be put in a separate appropriation bill. and limited urgent extra spending, and it passed both houses and received Royal Assent before the financial year it funded.
Critics argued the bill would fund a budget that spends too much, raises taxes, adds debt and still fails to fix cost-of-living pressure, housing, energy and regional infrastructure needs. Opposition came mainly from Coalition speakers, while the Greens and crossbench criticism focused on different gaps such as NDISThe national program funding disability supports, referred to in debate because some amendments and criticisms alleged cuts to it. cuts, gas-export taxation, JobSeeker and climate resilience.
Hon Dr Jim Chalmers MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 30 June 2026
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
3 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
49 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
The Act authorises $178.65 billion from the federal budget for the ordinary yearly running costs and services of government in 2026-27.
Government departments can use their running-cost funding for payments linked to their functions, while program funding must be used for the specific outcomes listed for each agency.
The Finance Minister can release up to $2.4 billion extra for urgent spending, including up to $2 billion reserved for fuel security needs.
Parliament cannot disallow the Finance Minister’s urgent spending decisions under this Act, so approved extra funding cannot be blocked after it is allocated.
Internal payments between Commonwealth agencies are treated like real payments, so those transfers still use up the money Parliament approved.
The main purpose of the Bill is to propose appropriations from the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF) for the ordinary annual services of the Government.Appropriation explanatory memorandum
Departmental items involve costs over which a non-corporate entity has control. Departmental appropriations can be used to make any payment related to the functions of the non-corporate entity including on purposes covered by other items whether or not they are in the Bill for an entity. Expenditure typically covered by departmental items includes:Appropriation explanatory memorandum
Subclause 10(1) enables the Finance Minister to allocate additional amounts for expenditure when satisfied that there is an urgent need for expenditure in the current year that is not provided for, or is insufficiently provided for, in Schedule 1 either because of an erroneous omission or understatement, or because of unforeseen circumstances. The allocated amount is referred to as the Advance to the Finance Minister (AFM).Appropriation explanatory memorandum
(4) A determination made under subsection (2) is a legislative instrument, but neither section 42 (disallowance) nor Part 4 of Chapter 3 (sunsetting) of the Legislation Act 2003 applies to the determination.Appropriation as-passed bill text
When a non-corporate entity makes a payment, whether to another non‑corpor entity or another part of the same non-corporate entity (such as a different “business unit” within the entity), it is to be treated as a “real” payment. This means that the appropriation made by the Parliament is extinguished by the amount of the notional payment, even though no payment is actually made from the CRF. Similarly, a notional receipt in such a situation is to be treated by the receiving non-corporate entity (where relevant) as if it were a real receipt. This does not mean every internal transfer of public money involves a notional payment and receipt.Appropriation explanatory memorandum
Context
Australia’s appropriation system already required ordinary annual government spending to be authorised by Parliament in a separate bill, with Portfolio Budget StatementsBudget documents that explain the outcomes, programs and agency funding behind the amounts listed in the appropriation bills. setting out the agency outcomes and programs behind the figures. Against the 2026-27 budget’s stated pressures on households and public services, Hon Dr Jim Chalmers MP introduced the bill to authorise $178.65 billion for ordinary annual servicesThe routine yearly costs of running the Australian Government, which the Constitution requires to be put in a separate appropriation bill. and limited urgent extra spending, and it passed both houses and received Royal Assent before the financial year it funded.
Constitution requires separate annual spending bills
Sections 53 and 54 require ordinary annual services of governmentThe routine yearly costs of running the Australian Government, which the Constitution requires to be put in a separate appropriation bill. to be dealt with separately from other appropriations, shaping the structure of the 2026-27 budget appropriation bills.
Appropriation explanatory memorandum ↗Budget papers set out 2026-27 agency funding
Portfolio Budget StatementsBudget documents that explain the outcomes, programs and agency funding behind the amounts listed in the appropriation bills. were published for the budget appropriation bills to explain the outcomes and programs that agencies would use the appropriated money to deliver.
Appropriation explanatory memorandum ↗Treasurer frames the budget around economic pressure
In the budget speech, Hon Dr Jim Chalmers MP said the budget was intended to help Australia deal with external challenges and take pressure off ordinary Australians.
Hansard ↗Hon Dr Jim Chalmers MP introduces the annual services bill
The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives to authorise $178.65 billion from the Consolidated Revenue FundThe main pool of Commonwealth public money from which this Act authorises spending to be drawn. for the ordinary annual services of governmentThe routine yearly costs of running the Australian Government, which the Constitution requires to be put in a separate appropriation bill. in 2026-27.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary approval for the ordinary annual servicesThe routine yearly costs of running the Australian Government, which the Constitution requires to be put in a separate appropriation bill. appropriation before the funded year began.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal Assent turns the bill into an Act
Royal Assent made the appropriation law, allowing the authorised money to be drawn for the 2026-27 financial year.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Referred to Federation Chamber
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Reported from Federation Chamber
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Considered by scrutiny committee (25/06/2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 7 of 2026
Scrutiny Digest 7 of 2026
APH bill page notesThe chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
Critics argued the bill would fund a budget that spends too much, raises taxes, adds debt and still fails to fix cost-of-living pressure, housing, energy and regional infrastructure needs. Opposition came mainly from Coalition speakers, while the Greens and crossbench criticism focused on different gaps such as NDISThe national program funding disability supports, referred to in debate because some amendments and criticisms alleged cuts to it. cuts, gas-export taxation, JobSeeker and climate resilience.
Criticism was broad but mostly targeted the budget package, not the appropriation machinery itself.
Higher spending, debt and inflation risk
Coalition critics said the bill bankrolls a budget that expands government spending, increases debt and risks making inflation and household costs worse rather than easing them.
Tax changes said to hurt investment and small business
Several Coalition speakers argued the budget relied on harmful new or higher taxes affecting housing, savings, trusts, small business and entrepreneurship, warning this would discourage investment and hurt families and young Australians.
Regional and infrastructure concerns
Regional Coalition MPs said the budget would leave regional communities worse off by shortchanging roads, agriculture, local infrastructure and services while increasing pressure on families and businesses outside the cities.
Progressive criticism that the budget did not go far enough
Greens and some crossbench criticism said the budget failed to meet social and climate needs, including by not taxing gas export revenue more heavily, not reversing NDISThe national program funding disability supports, referred to in debate because some amendments and criticisms alleged cuts to it. cuts, not lifting JobSeeker enough and falling short on climate resilience.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Recorded amendment and procedural votes grouped by chamber. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.
House
Defeated 9 to 71. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and minor parties and independents.
The amendment was defeated, so the House rejected that policy call and then agreed to the bill's second reading.
Senate
Defeated 10 to 33. Support came from Greens. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, UAP, and minor parties and independents.
The amendment was defeated, so the Senate did not add that statement to the second-reading motion before proceeding with the bill.
Defeated 5 to 38. Support came from One Nation and UAP. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Liberal, and minor parties and independents.
The amendment was defeated, so the Senate did not attach that condition and then agreed to the bills at second reading.
This list includes amendment votes, procedural votes and votes on the bill itself.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Chalmers supports the bill, saying the budget is meant to help Australia through the global oil shock with cost-of-living relief while building a stronger economy, a fairer tax system and a more sustainable budget.
Read in Hansard ↗Angus Taylor opposes the appropriation billA bill that asks Parliament to approve government spending from public money for specified purposes., arguing Labor's budget drives up spending, debt and inflation while imposing harmful new taxes on housing, savings and small business.
Read in Hansard ↗Zali Steggall says the budget and appropriation bills include some helpful measures, but she argues they fall well short on climate resilience, fairness in tax changes, and support for people on JobSeeker.
Read in Hansard ↗Julian Leeser says he opposes the budget bill and wants it defeated because he argues it breaks tax promises, hurts small business, investors and retirees, and makes housing and energy problems worse.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
28 speakers · 28 support
“This budget is about getting us through the global oil shock and taking pressure off Australians while building a stronger economy, a better tax system and a more sustainable budget and lifting living standards for our people.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This budget is about relief, recovery and resilience, and I'm proud to speak on the appropriation bills associated with it. It delivers more tax cuts and a fair go at buying your own home, and it strengthens Medicare for all. It's about getting workers, families and businesses in my community through the current global fuel crisis while building a stronger economy that works for more people. At the outset, I want to say that the budget is a budget dedicated to tax relief for 13.3 million Australian workers, helping more people realise the great Australian dream of homeownership and creating a fairer and more sustainable tax system for all Australians.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I want to contrast the government's budget with the opposition's chaos and cuts. This is a responsible budget. It's focused on relief now, resilience for the country in the face of global shocks and reform to set us up for success in the future, particularly for the next generation. It's a tough environment globally and for many in Australia. The conflict in the Middle East is weighing heavily on our economy and compounding the cost-of-living pressures experienced by too many Australians. The budget is about delivering more cost-of-living help and building a more productive economy, a better tax system and a fairer housing market with a stronger and more sustainable budget.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is a government that has, I think, been characterised by the fact that it has made hard decisions. We make the hard decisions. We're making the hard decisions because, effectively, they're the right decisions to make. You see that in the debate around this year's budget, and in our record of delivery over a period of time, because we are focused on helping workers, we're focused on helping first home buyers and we're focused on helping small businesses, so that more Australians can earn more and keep more of what they earn and also get into the housing market and get ahead.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise today to speak in support of the debate on the Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2026-2027 and related bills. This Labor budget is focused on relief, resilience and reform that delivers for all Australians. That's why this budget is delivering more tax cuts, a stronger Medicare and a fair go at homeownership. It's delivering more cost-of-living relief and helping build an economy that works for more people. We know that people are doing it really tough right now. Cost-of-living pressures have been compounded by the conflict in the Middle East, while at the same time we face longstanding challenges when it comes to productivity, intergenerational equity and access to housing.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Four years ago, we inherited a broken taxation system, and we've been focused and determined to fix it. The concessions favour those who produce in our economy, and they couldn't come at a better time, with a global oil shock and a housing crisis. We are delivering tax relief. We are building an economy that works for people. An economy begins with homeownership. A dream of homeownership is part of the Australian story. Sadly, as I said, right now it's just too hard for many Australians to get into their own home and get ahead. A decade of coalition government let these conditions take root. In recent weeks, the opposition has made much of the 'aspirational Australians' budget, but it's a very narrow and limited view of the world. Why should aspiration be limited to people who can afford to trade assets? Aspiration should extend to a childcare worker, a nurse or a teacher who's working hard and trying to get ahead. We know this. That's why these landmark reforms to capital gains tax and negative gearing are being introduced. I'm happy to be on the record, even as late as last year, saying that I had discussed with the Treasurer my support for restricting tax breaks for housing investors to brand new properties and for grandfathering the current arrangements for existing landlords. I was clear that I'd certainly support changes to capital gains tax and I would support changes to negative gearing. Now budget night has come and gone and we are getting on with the job, cleaning up the mess that was left to us by those opposite.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This budget is a responsible and forward-looking plan that recognises the pressures people are under right now while also making our economy fairer into the future. Canberrans are feeling the pressure right now, and this budget meets those pressures head on. It delivers targeted cost-of-living relief, strengthens essential services like health and housing that people rely on, supports Australia's transition to clean energy and reinforces a more resilient economy. Importantly, it reflects Labor values of fairness, opportunity and ensuring that no-one is left behind. For the ACT, it continues a strong record of investment in our services, infrastructure and national institutions. It ensures that Canberra remains a great place to live, work and raise a family.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is a big, bold and fair budget. It's a Labor budget at its core, putting fairness first and supporting Australians. I'm proud to be part of the team delivering for the Illawarra and I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills deliver cost-of-living relief. They strengthen Medicare, they support housing affordability and they invest in Australia's long-term resilience in an uncertain world. I know how important these investments are right now and will continue to be to my local community. I know what it means when a local family can access free, urgent health care close to home. I know what it means when a young person gets a fairer shot at buying their first home. And I know what it means when governments invest in the communities they represent. Ultimately, budgets are about people and about the types of communities we want to build and the type of country we want Australia to be.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This budget builds on the work of the Albanese Labor government, delivering more cost-of-living relief, stronger health care, more housing and greater opportunities for all Australians. While Australians are working hard, we know many are still doing it tough. This budget responds to that challenge. It delivers more tax cuts for every taxpayer, putting more money back into people's pockets when it matters most, benefiting millions of workers right across the country, including more than three million Queenslanders.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“If I may find some sort of agreement with the member for Gippsland, the previous coalition speaker, I will say this: budgets are a reflection of values and we absolutely in this budget demonstrate values—values of fairness for first home buyers who want to get a foot in the door and values of better health care for people by investing in Medicare. I think Medicare is a great reflection of Australian values—that we all chip in to make sure that, when people need help with their health, they are not dependent on their wallet. We all chip in to provide a quality universal healthcare system. If you compare us to the United States, one of the biggest causes of bankruptcy there is medical costs. We don't have that here. We're providing now, under this budget, cheaper medicines. We've made permanent Medicare urgent care clinics, like the one we opened up in Rooty Hill in 2023 that has seen nearly 23,000 people out of hours and given them urgent health care, and all people needed to bring to get that help was their Medicare card. It's a terrific development.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Our efforts to help people with the cost of living, through this budget and previous ones, is seen starkly in health. This budget contains more work in the healthcare area—like making medicines cheaper by listing new and amended medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, including treatments for cystic fibrosis, chronic kidney disease and various cancers, with $5.9 billion provided over five years. An additional $25 billion over five years will strengthen our public hospitals. We're also securing the future of Medicare urgent care clinics, with $1.8 billion over five years, with ongoing secure funding.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is a responsible budget for the times. Budgets are never easy. I can never recall walking into this chamber at budget time and listening to a government saying how easy it is to balance their budget. It's never easy. But under all the circumstances that Australia faces right now, this is the right budget for the times.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Nearly two weeks ago we stood in this chamber and heard the Treasurer handing down the 2026-27 budget. It's a budget that delivers what Australia needs right now. It's responsible, it implements real reform and it's about making sure the economy works better for more Australians, not just a few. It doesn't matter where you go in my local electorate on Brisbane's south side, whether it's a barbecue in Tarragindi, whether it's on the doors in Annerley, whether it's an event in Sunnybank, whether it's on a street corner in Acacia Ridge, everyone raises the same challenges that they and their families are facing again and again and again. Those challenges are housing and cost of living.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We know that Australians are doing it tough at the moment. We know there are a lot of people out there who are working very hard to make ends meet, and we know that there are people out there that are doing their very best just to survive. That's why it is imperative that this budget, which was announced last week, goes through the House of Representatives and the Senate to ensure that it is focused on and targets those people that need it the most. In the budget, we heard that there's more housing—it's a fairer budget to try and bring to fruition for those who have missed out for a number of years the Australian dream of purchasing a home.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These reforms ensure that we can generate additional revenue and budget savings. The revenue will increase by $44 billion to 2028-29 since MYEFO. We're also ensuring that there are savings that are outlined in our budget through reforms to the National Disability Insurance Scheme, to the way private health insurance operates and to uncommitted funding across programs. In total, there's $63.8 billion in savings in this budget alone. That will take pressure off Australians because we will be able to return some of those savings to Australians in the form of returning bracket creep. That's in the form of the two tax cuts that are coming over the course of the next two years, the working Australians tax offset, the $1,000 deduction and being able to halve the fuel excise at the moment while Australians are facing increasing prices at the bowser. Because we're making those responsible decisions, because we're reforming our taxation system and because we've been able to find savings, we're able to return some of the bracket creep to Australians in the form of lower taxes and additional incentives in our taxation system.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is a responsible budget, a reforming budget, a budget designed to promote economic resilience. It's a budget for all Australians, young and old, no matter your background. And it's a budget that recognises the urgency of the moment, a moment that the Albanese Labor government is determined to meet. I commend these bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We need to build a better Australia for young people, to give them the opportunity to own their first home, to give them a foothold. Already these policies are working. Every weekend, we're seeing news reports of first home buyers getting into their first home. They're shocked, surprised that they are no longer competing against investors for existing stock. This is a good thing. We need people to have the aspiration to own their first home, just like I was able to and just like many people in previous generations were able to. These are tough reforms, but we are doing them for the right reasons and at the right time. I commend these bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Do you know what this budget is about? It is a choice. It is a choice about a first home buyer getting into their own home or someone wanting their third investment property. It chooses people who want to live in a home over people who want to profit from homes. That is a choice that this government is proud to make. This is a government that is not afraid of reform, and this budget proves it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Those opposite want to keep younger Australians down and want to continue to lock them out of the housing market. They showed their true colours voting against our cost-of-living measures, including our tax cuts. They have said they will vote against tax reform—the tax reforms that are being introduced in this bill—and that, if this reform gets passed by the parliament, they will repeal them when they are next in government. What we are doing is making fundamental change to support our communities and get more people into a home of their own. We are helping with cost of living through this bill. And I want to say to the young people across Australia and in my Brisbane electorate: this government wants to support you, to give you the best opportunities in life and to give you a fair crack. That's the Australian way, and that's what we will always fight for.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Labor's budget backs working Australians not just in principle but in practice. It supports families under pressure. It strengthens Medicare. It builds housing supply. It makes the tax system fairer and it invests in clean energy and our environment. This budget moves us in the right direction—a direction grounded in fairness, opportunity and responsibility. It recognises the pressures people are under and responds with practical measures that make a difference. It invests in the future, not just in the present. It ensures that Australia remains a hopeful nation that continues to believe in a fair go for all, where opportunity is not determined by postcode, background or circumstance but by effort, contribution and fairness.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The measures I've spoken of today are united by a simple principle. Labor believes government should make life better for ordinary Australians—not harder, not more expensive and not more uncertain. Government should not be dragging us back to the last century. Whether it's strengthening Medicare, making medicines cheaper, expanding mental health care, supporting older Australians or investing in cleaner, cheaper energy—these are reforms designed to improve people's lives. They are reforms grounded in fairness, grounded in opportunity and grounded in the belief that no Australian should be left behind. That's what this government is delivering, and that's why these investments matter so deeply to communities like Newcastle and the Hunter.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to speak on the Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2026-2027 and other appropriation bills for 2026-2027. Our Treasurer delivered the 2026 budget two weeks ago, and it is a budget for every Australian. It is a budget for workers, for first home buyers, for families struggling with cost-of-living pressures and for future generations. It is an ambitious budget in a challenging global environment. It is a budget full of tough decisions to build resilience and bolster our economy, while also finally addressing intergenerational inequality. It is a budget that delivers more cost-of-living relief, more funding for Medicare, housing, aged care and much-needed tax reform. It also delivers for my home state of Queensland. This is a budget about resilience and security, getting Australians through the global oil shock while building a fair economy that works for more people. I am incredibly proud of it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Having grown up in the outer suburbs of Melbourne, I've always been determined to fight to ensure that aspiration is afforded to everyone who works and contributes, not just an exclusive realm for people who already own significant wealth while leaving policy settings in place which serve to leave the many behind. This is what this budget is fundamentally about: rewarding work, aspiration and restoring fairness. This budget shows ours is a government determined to tackle the problems facing this country. It is a calm, thoughtful response to a generational problem decades in the making.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Unbelievably, we are already seeing results. We are seeing first home buyers, over just two weekends in, who are able to compete against investors, as they aren't using the money that they were getting from taxpayers to prop up their bids. Already we're seeing results. It might have taken us 40 years to get into this mess, but we don't have 40 years to fix it. And so I commend the bill to this House, as part of the government's strategy to fix things up for— (Time expired)”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This budget is about creating opportunities. It is pro-aspiration for people seeking to enter the housing market and invest in their future, especially for young people. It is pro-worker for those families feeling the pinch and in need of tax relief. It is pro-investment for individuals and businesses looking to build their futures with shares and portfolios. This Albanese Labor government is not shying away from the difficult reforms that are necessary to build our nation's future. We are proud of what we have delivered, but we know there is more work to do. Good governments listen to their constituents, they do not alienate parts of their communities, and they do not pit them against each other.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I commend this Bill to the chamber.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill, Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2026-2027, along with Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2026-2027 and Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 1) 2026-2027, are the budget appropriation bills for 2026-27.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
20 speakers · 21 contributions · 20 oppose
“Their budget is also an attack on every Australian. As Labor's own budget papers state, its tax hikes will reduce the number of houses available for young Australians to buy or to rent. Labor's negative gearing changes will hand over housing investment to multinationals and foreign pension funds. Labor's increase to the capital gains tax will discourage the investment Australia needs to grow. Labor's small business tax will punish small and family businesses that are already working harder than ever and collapsing at record rates. The Treasurer's higher taxes aren't economic reform; they're an assault on aspiration. They're an attack on the wealth creation that benefits all. They will crush the reward-for-hard-work spirit that underpins our nation's success. And so the coalition will fight like hell to prevent Labor's toxic taxes from becoming law. But, if they do, I commit that a coalition government I lead will repeal them.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We oppose this budget and its tax increases. I can't support a budget that taxes and disadvantages my community as much as this budget does. This is a bad Labor budget. It deserves to be opposed. We will fight these toxic taxes every step of the way. If they get through, we will repeal them.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Instead of a plan for the future of regional Australia, in the budget we saw more broken promises, higher taxes, more debt, lower living standards and fewer homes for Australians. The budget papers themselves say that, under the changes being delivered by this government, 35,000 fewer homes will be built. That's in their own budget papers.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I would love to fight an election on this issue. It's a shame we didn't, and they weren't upfront about it 12 months ago. I think we would have had a very different result. I'd love to, but they're trying to jam it in between elections. I think we could win an election on this, but I hope they backflip on it. I really do hope this is backflipped on because I think it will destroy Australia. We're hearing about carve-outs, and now we're hearing in the press carve-outs aren't going to fix it. It's not going to go far enough. We need these taxes axed for Andrew and his wife, a teacher and a nurse. That is the face of what is happening here. This budget's not just a fiscal document; it's a statement of values. And Labor's values are clear. If you work hard, they're going to tax you more. If you save, they will tax you more. If you invest, they will tax you more. If you run a small business, they will tax you more. If you try to build a future for your family, they will make that harder. It's not reform; it's an assault on everyday Australians. And the great contradiction is this: Labor says it wants more housing and more housing supply, but its policies will drive investment away from housing. Labor says it wants to help renters, but fewer investors means fewer rental homes, and we know how many: 35,000. It's in black and white in the budget papers for that policy.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to speak to the Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2026-2027. Labor's budget of broken promises and higher taxes destroys any concept of a fair go for the people of Hinkler. I was on the road only last week with my mobile offices straight off the bat. At every stop on the map, from Fishermen's Park at Urangan to Pialba, from the foreshore at Bargara to Woodgate Beach and to the bustling main street of Childers and then across to Bundaberg, in every location I've heard loud and clear that confidence is low and so, too, is the trust in this Labor government. There's the lack of a fair go for veterans, the unfair private health insurance rebate removal for our over-65s, despair over Labor's toxic taxes and crippling conditions for small businesses.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This budget reveals something deeper than bad economics. It reveals a government that fundamentally misunderstands aspiration. Labor sees aspiration as something suspicious: 'If you start a business, we tax you. If you invest, we tax you. If you save, we tax you. If you inherit something from your parents, we're going to tax you. And, if you drive a truck, work in the mining industry or rely on affordable energy, we're going to regulate you into oblivion.' This government does not believe that prosperity is created by individuals and communities. It believes that prosperity belongs first to the government. This budget is not about building Australia stronger; it is about managing its decline. It asks Australians to expect less, own less, save less and aspire less. But Australians are better than that. Regional Australians are better than that. The people of Flynn are better than that. Australians do not want a government that punishes success and subsidises failure. This is an appalling budget. Words fail me.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Taken as a whole, this budget lets rural and regional people down big time. It's a budget that defunds regional Australia. It's as though Labor has drawn a line around metropolitan Labor seats and said, 'The rest of you: you'll have to make do.'”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This budget centres around three key themes for this government: broken promises and lies, higher taxes and rising debt. It's a budget that does what Labor promised they wouldn't do. It shows the true colours of this government, which is comfortable breaking promises to the Australian people who put them in this place. The Prime Minister said this would be a budget about Labor values. Well, I guess it's a budget about Labor values in tribute to Julia Gillard and 'No carbon tax under my government.' It is in their DNA to lie to the Australian people.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The budget was just a budget of broken promises, higher taxes, more debt, lower living standards and fewer homes for Australians. There is a projected decade of deficits worth about $150 billion, with gross debt of around $1.25 trillion, annual interest costs of over $42 billion per year—that's roughly $80,000 per minute. Higher taxes of about $50 billion in total were announced, including $15 billion from personal income tax. Government spending is at its highest level in 40 years, outside of the pandemic. There are 35,000 fewer homes being built. This is in Labor's own budget papers.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“But this budget is the highest taxing budget ever. Goodness me! In this economy, at this time, it is the highest taxing budget ever. What a challenge for future treasurers! How do you address the impact this will have? What this budget does in addition to being the highest taxing budget ever is it banks in 10 years of deficits. When you talk about the performance of a Treasurer or a government—the economic credibility, its legacy—one would think that the economic situation it leaves after it is the most important factor in determining that legacy. A government that leaves you a decade of deficits, after having delivered the highest taxing budget ever, that's an incredible legacy and one that this government should be ashamed of. It is also the highest spending budget in 40 years, outside of the pandemic. In the first term of this government, we heard about spending restraint from the Treasurer. I'm not sure that the word was being used as it is commonly understood. We have the highest spending budget in 40 years. There is no restraint. There is no spending restraint here at all!”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“That's why I say that this budget is a budget of broken promises. This budget only provides for a low-incentive economy—the LIE budget that unfortunately the Treasurer will probably tell us we had to have. Well, we didn't have to have it. There is a better way. The better way is to make sure we put in water policies, housing policies, migration policies and farming and agriculture policies that will work for and on behalf of the national interest and protect those regional Australians who protect this country. I haven't even gotten to the veterans, who have been absolutely deserted by this government, but I will certainly have more to say about that in future speeches. We need to protect those who protect us.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The history of Australia in recent times is really interesting. You had a Whitlam government that was quite a left-wing government and wanted a lot of government control in everything; a Fraser government that rejected those ideas but didn't make the reforms that it should have made; and a Hawke-Keating government that perhaps rejected the old Labor ideology—which has come back, by the way—of big government and tried to open Australia's economy up to something better, to the dynamism and the influence that a really strong and competitive global private enterprise can have. Hawke and Keating understood that, and they understood that was the way to get Australia going. Here we have a budget that is taking us in a very different direction from Hawke and Keating, expanding the size of government, making sure more people are involved in the government and employed by the government and really making it difficult for private enterprise to get ahead.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Our task, as I said in my first speech, is not to manage decline but to shape destiny. It's to restore the promise that effort will be rewarded, that freedom will be protected and that opportunity is not the privilege of a few but the inheritance of all. This budget does not do that. The coalition will.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise today to speak on the appropriation bills before the House and to put on record what people in Capricornia and across regional Australia are telling me plainly. They are doing it tough, and they've been asked to pay more while getting less in return. Appropriation bills are not just paperwork; they are a statement of a government's priorities—what it funds, what it cuts and who it chooses to back. On the evidence of this budget and what flows from it, the message to the regions is, once again, 'You are not a priority.'”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“At a time when Australians are doing it tough, those opposite celebrated on budget night—celebrated a budget of broken promises; a budget of higher taxes, with more spending and less to see for it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We ask our Australian public, the people in our electorates, to tighten their belts. We ask them to tighten their belts. Debate on Appropriation Bill (No.1) and Appropriation Bill (No.2) is exactly the time when the opposition speaks to the government and says to them, 'It is about time that government tightens its belt.' The government needs to live within its means. No longer can we keep going back to the trough of taxes. No longer can we go back to the trough of borrowing money from overseas countries where we are accruing an interest component that is beyond the comprehension. There was a point in history when we on this side left no debt for a Labor government. Today we are looking down the barrel of a trillion dollars. It is a shame, and I will finish where I started. I want to thank my Christine for encouraging me to re-read George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, where I remember intently the workings of the Ministry of Truth. Shame!”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“On housing, the government has adopted elements of the coalition's previous infrastructure proposal but at a reduced scale, committing $2 billion instead of the $5 billion originally proposed. By contrast, the coalition's regional Australia future fund aimed to ensure a fair share of housing infrastructure investment for regional communities—something not clearly replicated in this budget. In response, the coalition's budget in reply outlines a different path. Angus Taylor and Matt Canavan have committed to reversing the new tax measures. We will repeal them.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I encourage all the Labor caucus members who are in here to stand up to this. You might agree with the policy. I respect the fact that you might agree with it. I disagree with it. I think it will kill private enterprise. I encourage the Labor caucus members in this chamber to go to the leadership of your party and at least question whether it was appropriate to be deceptive with this. Was it appropriate that, 12 months ago, we, as a political party, as the government of this country, deceived the Australian people? Dave Hughes has gone public. He said he voted for you lot in the election last year. He is saying that you do not have the mandate for this. And you don't have the mandate. If you think you have the mandate, look at how you important you think democracy is and how important you think elections are. If you're going to bring important legislation—this is not just normal budget appropriation stuff. This is radical reform to the tax system. That's when you take that to an election first because of the ramifications it will have. I say shame on every Labor MP who's going to vote for this.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Andrew Willcox on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Andrew Willcox opposes the appropriation billA bill that asks Parliament to approve government spending from public money for specified purposes., saying it embodies a reckless Labor budget that worsens inflation and piles more pressure on families, small businesses and regional industries. He argues the government is spending without restraint despite strong revenues and is making Australians worse off.
“I rise today to speak to the brutal reality of what this Labor government's budget has delivered. This budget is a formal declaration of economic surrender. What we're seeing is an administration that has completely run out of ideas and run out of money. As we all know, when Labor run out of money, they come after yours. Just over a week ago, the Treasurer delivered a budget that completely abandons everyday Australians at a time when they're facing the most acute financial pressure in a generation. These appropriation bills represent a written testament to the fiscal recklessness of this Labor government.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Andrew Willcox opposes the appropriation billA bill that asks Parliament to approve government spending from public money for specified purposes., arguing it delivers reckless spending, bigger deficits and higher taxes while making inflation, power prices and cost-of-living pressure worse, especially in regional Australia. He says the budget wastes money on Labor priorities instead of easing household pain or strengthening the economy.
“The fundamental failure of these appropriations is the complete and total lack of basic human empathy. This government simply does not understand the depth of the pain its policies are causing. People are facing genuine, terrifying desperation. The people of regional Australia are angry, and they have every right to be angry. They are deeply frustrated because they feel completely invisible to the Prime Minister, who promised them a better future and delivered nothing but broken words and shattered trust. They were promised a better life. Instead, they've been hit by consecutive interest rate rises that have stripped hundreds of dollars out of their disposable income every single month.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“I know they're allergic to the L word over there, so we can use every other word for it. But Australians like Ian and his wife know what's going on here. They can see it and they are angry. That's why we on the coalition side will be voting against these sorts of outrageous taxes. This assault on aspiration and this raid on the pockets of Australians are simply because this is a government that has run out of money. And when they run out of money, they come after yours. That's exactly what Ian and his wife have seen, and their story, unfortunately, is far from unique. Ian wrote that he was unsure whether other people from—”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 oppose
“This budget fails the Australian people in many ways. I'm not saying there's no good in it. What I'm saying is it fails to meet the scale of people's needs, the needs of the moment and the boldness required to get Australia back on track. The biggest symbol of this failure is the government's decision to not include a tax on gas exports. This failure is not just significant economically; it's a failure because of what it represents. It's a failure because it shows a clear disdain from our political class towards people's clearly expressed wishes. Some people call this campaign for a gas tax populism. I prefer to call it democracy, but it seems our political class finds democracy a suspicious concept.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 oppose
“This is quite a remarkable state of affairs we're in. Now, I'm not saying that the coalition hasn't done bad budgets as well. I was present for Joe Hockey's budget. That was a train wreck. This is up there with it—an absolute train wreck. What you hear all the time from wonderful colleagues on the other side are people going through the talking points who have absolutely no idea about how business works. So here's the suggestion: if you want to make the assets on the balance sheet work, you must give a strategic mechanism that gives them an advantage. One of the great strategic mechanisms that gives them an advantage is the price of energy. To get the price of energy going, you have to have a continuous supply that's predictable and reliable, which is coal-fired power. You have to have the brains not to blow up Liddell power station but to actually refurbish it and make it bigger and better and make it work. That's what brains do. That gives you a strategic asset on your balance sheet.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
5 speakers · 2 oppose · 3 unclear
“I rise to respond to the government's budget papers and the appropriation bills for 2026-27. The budget contains measures that respond to some immediate pressures, but it fails the bigger test on a number of fronts—and I want to deal with some of those tonight.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“While I acknowledge the government for some of these reforms, they can and they should do more to address the deep-rooted inequities facing regional and rural Australia. This is not just a question of fairness. It's about setting our nation on a path to greater productivity and long-term prosperity. Regional Australia consistently demonstrates strong productivity outcomes with a track record of outperforming our share of the population. The deputy speaker knows this. To realise our full potential, we need strong health services, we need sound infrastructure, and we need policy choices that back in the ambition of regional communities and invest in our future.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I can't tell you how many emails I've received but I think that the government needs to do better on this. For the first time in a decade, I just cannot support this budget bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I would urge the government to bring in a gas export tax. I would also urge the government to be upfront and transparent about its dealings with the public. Regardless of what you think about these tax changes, if the government had wanted to bring them in, it should have had the integrity to go to the Australian people and ask for a mandate for them. It's very simple. I'm a crossbencher, but I have seen this happen before. When coalition governments broke promises, they were rightly condemned for it, including by those on the opposite side of the chamber. So you shouldn't expect anything different to happen to you. There is no mandate for this. For us, this budget was a budget of broken highways and broken promises—and you can't build public trust on broken promises, and you can't run a regional economy on broken highways.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“There was a gas-tax shaped hole in the budget, a $17-billion-per-year sized hole. We could all see it. We were all disappointed by it. In the lead-up to this year's budget, Australians of all political persuasions, people across my electorate and people across the entire country were hoping that this would be the budget where we finally secured a fair return on our natural resources. These resources are owned by the public and yet they're given away often royalty-free and on minimal tax to multinationals and Australian corporations that rake in literally billions of dollars every year. Unfortunately, this budget does nothing to change that.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Returned to House for further consideration
Returned to House for further consideration
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Consideration in detail debate
Consideration in detail
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
House · Consideration in detail debate
Consideration in detail
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
House · Consideration in detail debate
Consideration in detail
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
House · Reported from Federation Chamber
Reported from Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.
Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills
Scrutiny Digest 7 of 2026
Considered by scrutiny committee (25 June 2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 7 of 2026
APH bill page notes