Mostly symbolic
Critics said doubling the penalties could look tough without changing how price-gouging cases are actually stopped or prosecuted.
This bill became law on Mar 27th, 2026.
Budget, tax & economy
The bill increases the maximum penalties for some serious breaches of competition and consumer law, including false or misleading conduct and cartel conduct.
Rising petrol prices from the Middle East conflict increased costs across the economy and risked businesses using the shock as cover for false, misleading or cartel conduct. The bill doubles maximum penalties to $100 million for serious competition and consumer law breaches to deter that misconduct.
Competition and consumer law already allowed very large court penalties, and Australia had lifted those maximums in 2022. When conflict in the Middle East sent oil and petrol prices surging, raising fears businesses could exploit the shock with misleading claims or price-fixing, this bill doubled the worst-case cap to $100 million per breach.
The main criticism was that higher ACCCAustralia’s competition and consumer regulator that investigates breaches and takes court enforcement action. penalties alone might look tough but would not, by themselves, stop price gouging or greatly change enforcement. Some critics also said the bill was moving too quickly for proper parliamentary scrutiny.
The Labor government introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 27 Mar 2026
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
2 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
1 day
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
The bill increases the maximum penalties for some serious breaches of competition and consumer law, including false or misleading conduct and cartel conduct. Cartel conduct is when businesses secretly work together instead of competing.
For some company penalties, one of the main maximum amounts doubles from $50 million to $100 million for each breach.
It also increases penalties for businesses that make false or misleading claims about goods or services.
These are the highest penalties for the worst cases. A court still decides the actual amount, up to the legal limit.
The changes start the day after Royal Assent. They apply only to conduct that happens after the new law starts.
The Bill amends the CCA, including the ACL, to increase the maximum penalty applicable to certain breaches of competition and consumer law to deter false or misleading conduct and cartel conduct.Explanatory memorandum
The Bill amends certain penalties for anti-competitive conduct and breaches of consumer law. Each of the amended penalties has a maximum penalty determined by a three-limb test (as outlined above). The Bill doubles the value of the first limb from $50 million to $100 million for each of these penalties. This has the effect of increasing the maximum penalty that can be imposed for a breach.Explanatory memorandum
Making false or misleading representations about goods or services,Explanatory memorandum
The new maximum penalties are intended to apply in the most egregious instances of non-compliance. The Court determines the appropriate amount for a penalty, up to the maximum set under the law.Explanatory memorandum
The Bill commences the day after Royal Assent. The amended penalty amounts apply to offences committed, or contraventions, acts or omissions that occur, on or after Schedule 1 to the Bill commences.Explanatory memorandum
Context
Competition and consumer law already allowed very large court penalties, and Australia had lifted those maximums in 2022. When conflict in the Middle East sent oil and petrol prices surging, raising fears businesses could exploit the shock with misleading claims or price-fixing, this bill doubled the worst-case cap to $100 million per breach.
Fuel-sector scrutiny package included a penalty-doubling plan
Ministers paired extra fuel-market monitoring with a plan to double penalties for false or misleading conduct and cartels.
Explanatory memorandum ↗Competition and consumer penalties were last raised in 2022
That meant large court penalties already existed before the new bill pushed the ceiling higher again.
Explanatory memorandum ↗Middle East conflict drove petrol volatility across Australia
With oil and petrol costs jumping, ministers warned some businesses could exploit the shock instead of competing fairly.
Treasury Ministers ↗Bill introduced to lift top penalties to $100 million
The measure would raise one main maximum penalty for companies from $50 million to $100 million for each serious breach.
Parliament of Australia ↗Royal Assent made the penalty-doubling law official
It became law as the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCCAustralia’s competition and consumer regulator that investigates breaches and takes court enforcement action. Enforcement) Act 2026.
Federal Register of Legislation ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
Senators examined the bill in detail and considered amendments clause by clause.
Committee of the Whole debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Key criticism
The main criticism was that higher ACCCAustralia’s competition and consumer regulator that investigates breaches and takes court enforcement action. penalties alone might look tough but would not, by themselves, stop price gouging or greatly change enforcement. Some critics also said the bill was moving too quickly for proper parliamentary scrutiny.
Support for the bill was still broad, but some members said it should come with wider reforms or more time for scrutiny.
Mostly symbolic
Critics said doubling the penalties could look tough without changing how price-gouging cases are actually stopped or prosecuted.
No ban on price gouging
Critics wanted a ban on price gouging across the economy. They said the bill still leaves the conduct itself untouched.
Too little scrutiny
Some MPs said the bill was being pushed through too quickly for proper parliamentary scrutiny.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Recorded amendment and procedural votes grouped by chamber. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.
Senate
Moved by Nick McKim (Australian Greens). Defeated 10 to 25. Support came from Greens and Australia's Voice. Opposition came from Labor and Liberal.
Passing it would not change the bill, but record Senate criticism and calls for wider price-gouging laws.
Moved by Nick McKim (Australian Greens). Defeated 11 to 26. Support came from Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, and Nationals.
Passing it would add an economy-wide price-gouging offence to the bill.
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
The Treasurer introduces the bill to double maximum penalties under competition law and the Australian Consumer Law from $50 million to $100 million, arguing this will strengthen the ACCCAustralia’s competition and consumer regulator that investigates breaches and takes court enforcement action.'s ability to deter and punish illegal price gouging and other unfair conduct.
Read in Hansard ↗Chaney criticises the rushed handling of the legislation and argues that, on the merits, doubling ACCCAustralia’s competition and consumer regulator that investigates breaches and takes court enforcement action. penalties is a performative measure that would not materially improve enforcement or prosecutions for price gouging.
Read in Hansard ↗Steggall criticises the rushed parliamentary process but supports urgent action on fuel prices and says this bill strengthens deterrence by increasing ACCCAustralia’s competition and consumer regulator that investigates breaches and takes court enforcement action. penalties for misleading conduct and cartel behaviour.
Read in Hansard ↗Gallagher introduces the bill to double maximum penalties under competition and consumer law from $50 million to $100 million, arguing this will strengthen ACCCAustralia’s competition and consumer regulator that investigates breaches and takes court enforcement action. enforcement against price gouging, cartel conduct, misleading representations and other unfair practices.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
19 speakers · 20 contributions · 18 support · 1 unclear
“This bill is an important way that we are protecting consumers and securing Australia's fuel security, but it's not the only way.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Gallagher on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
BILLS - Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026 - Second Reading
Gallagher introduces the bill to double maximum penalties under competition and consumer law from $50 million to $100 million, arguing this will strengthen ACCCAustralia’s competition and consumer regulator that investigates breaches and takes court enforcement action. enforcement against price gouging, cartel conduct, misleading representations and other unfair practices. She says the measure will protect consumers during fuel price pressures and aligns Australia’s penalties more closely with comparable economies.
“This bill is an important way we are protecting consumers and securing Australia's fuel security, but it's not the only way.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS - Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026 - Second Reading
Gallagher strongly supports the bill, arguing that doubling ACCCAustralia’s competition and consumer regulator that investigates breaches and takes court enforcement action. penalties to up to $100 million per offence is an important measure to combat price gouging, false or misleading conduct, cartel behaviour and other anti-competitive practices. She says passing the bill this week is very important and presents it as part of the government's broader response to economic impacts flowing from the Middle East conflict.
“Senator GALLAGHER (Australian Capital Territory—Minister for Finance, Minister for the Public Service, Minister for Women, Minister for Government Services and Manager of Government Business in the Senate) (15:40): I thank senators for their contribution on this bill. It is an important bill, and I think the passing of this bill this week, in one of the last things the Senate does in this sitting week, is very important.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“Mr NEUMANN (Blair) (10:48): I'm pleased to speak in support of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for the ACCC Enforcement) Bill and the Fair Work Amendment (Fairer Fuel) Bill 2026.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Let's be very clear: what this legislation, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026, is very clear about is that those global pressures are not an excuse for misconduct. They are not an excuse for misleading conduct or price manipulation, and they're certainly not an excuse for big corporations to treat Australian consumers like mugs. That's why the bill doubles penalties for those who do the wrong thing, lifting maximum penalties to $100 million per offence, because, if you're looking to rip off Australians, there should be real consequences for it. I'm certain that in my community people expect nothing less. I really understand that, at the moment, households in my community and others are doing all they can to manage their costs. People are shopping around. They are budgeting carefully. When they are doing this, the least they can expect is that the system is fair and that companies are playing by the rules. That is what we are achieving with this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Recent global events have added pressure to fuel markets. Australia cannot control global volatility, but we can control how strongly we protect consumers at home. These bills strengthen accountability, reinforce deterrence and ensure that the consequences for wrongdoing reflect the harm caused to real people and real businesses. This should be a shared priority across the parliament. I note the member for Wright has said we should be wary of the rush. My community can't wait for reliability of fuel price. Those opposite need to get on board and support a real measure that will make a tangible difference in the lives of Australians who are paying for fuel.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Albanese government has introduced this legislation—to up penalties at the petrol pump, as well as making it better, easier and fairer for our trucking industry—for a very clear reason: to help consumers get a fair go and to support our trucking industry. The conflict overseas should never be used as an excuse to profit from Australians. That is why we are putting petrol companies on notice. We will not let big corporations treat Australian consumers like mugs. We are calling on the opposition to support this bill because this is about holding companies to account when they do the wrong thing.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Importantly, this bill does not alter the independent role of the Fair Work Commission. It respects that role. The commission will continue to assess applications and make decisions independently, but this bill will ensure that in times of crisis it can act with urgency. This legislation builds on the significant steps the government has already taken to respond to this fuel crisis. We've acted quickly to protect Australians, doubling penalties for petrol price gouging and really teething up the ACCC to increase monitoring, enforcement and crackdown. We've acted to stabilise supply, releasing a portion of Australia's fuel reserves. We've adjusted the fuel standards to increase availability. And we've been working with our international partners to ensure that those ships keep coming. We're a reliable partner with LNG and coal, and they know they need to reciprocate those deals—and they are—but we're working constructively with them.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Our government is delivering for Australians. We have Australians' backs during times of crises, and we have the backs of truckies and all Australians at the bowser. On that note, I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Let's look at the practical things that the Albanese government is doing. One is the new legislation to provide for bigger penalties for misconduct in the fuel sector to help consumers get a fair go at the petrol pump. The conflict overseas should never be an excuse to profit off Australians. We're putting petrol companies on notice and this Treasury laws amendment to double the penalties does literally that. It doubles the penalties for false or misleading conduct and cartel behaviour to a maximum of $100 million per offence across the economy. We'd already increased penalties to $50 million—that's five times higher than what they were when we came to government—and we've given the ACCC more tools, such as extending petrol price monitoring powers and the ability to issue on-the-spot fines. This is a really important step, and it comes on top of the other action we're taking to address fuel affordability and security.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I would appeal to them to support this legislation. This needs to happen quickly. It needs to happen urgently, and all of the urgency that the other side have been talking about needs to be more than words. They need to stop making social media videos. They need to start acting in the national interest, and the best thing they could do would be start by supporting these bills.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“At the centre of that response is protecting consumers from being ripped off. So we've introduced the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill, which operates to double penalties for serious misconduct, lifting maximum penalties for false or misleading conduct to $100 million per offence. Let me be clear: the conflict overseas is not an excuse to profit from Australians, so we're putting the fuel sector on notice. We will not accept big corporates treating Australian motorists unfairly, and that's why we're empowering the ACCC to ramp up fuel price monitoring and issue on-the-spot fines. We are calling on those opposite to support this legislation and stand with Australian consumers.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The government has already introduced new laws to double penalties for petrol companies for price gouging. We've convened National Cabinet, we've appointed a national fuel supply task force coordinator, we've begun the release of 20 per cent of Australia's fuel reserves, we've changed petrol standards to get more fuel flowing and we've changed diesel standards so Australia's refineries can supply more diesel. The list of the actions that this government has taken goes on and on. I call on those opposite to support both of these bills, support the government and support Australians.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We're calling on the Liberals and Nationals to vote for this bill that will legislate higher penalties for petrol companies that do the wrong thing by transport operators and by all Australians.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I want to say to those opposite: when times are tough, when crises are on our shores, there is a time for real leadership in this place. That's why we've been elected. We need to stand up as one collective force in this place at this time for our country and ensure that our truckies are treated with respect and dignity and that our system is not taken advantage of. It is reprehensible that those opposite continue to politicise this crisis. It is time for the Leader of the Opposition to stand up and show some leadership on this very issue and stop politicising it. We need to act as one. We need to act in the best interests of every single Australian. It is time to support these bills.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We're in a good position to deal with this international crisis, and I dread to think where we would be right now if those opposite were in charge. Your record on fuel security is absolutely appalling. You had fuel reserves in Texas, in the United States, not Australia—fuel reserves overseas. Could you imagine trying to get them here in this crisis? You also shut down four of six fuel refineries, making storage so much more difficult. I call on those opposite to support this bill. If you genuinely believe in a fair go, if you genuinely stand with Australian consumers and Australian truckers, then you will support these bills. We are taking real action. Unlike those opposite, who are just playing games, we're actually delivering.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“While those opposite play political games, stunts, by calling on this legislation to be urgently passed—'very urgent' we heard from the last speaker—those in the other place on their side are referring it to a committee. Then, when we put it to a vote here, they voted against it anyway. Those opposite are playing very badly strategically planned stunts while this government has the backs of all Australians, and I'd call on those opposite to stop the stunts and stop the games. This is urgent. We need to get it through. You need to vote for it. You need to tell those in the other place that they need to vote for it as well. This is an urgent thing, and we really need all of us. We're elected to look after Australians. We all need to do what is right for our constituents and get this legislation through.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These new maximums will apply from the day after royal assent of this bill, providing the urgency that our environment demands. This bill sends a clear message from this government that we are on the side of the consumer, we are on the side of the families in Bullwinkel and we will not hesitate to hold the biggest players in our economy to account. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The first bill, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026, is about doubling penalties. No-one should be taking advantage, on a commercial basis, of people who are struggling to put fuel in their cars. The first bill gives effect to what the Treasurer and the assistant minister announced on 11 March—to double the ACCC's enforcement penalties, including for false and misleading conduct and for cartel behaviour, to a maximum of $100 million per offence.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The fact of the matter is that we have more supplies than we've ever had before. It's available; the distribution is the problem. They know it's the problem. It's because people are hoarding fuel, and more and more fuel needs to go out. That's where the blockage is. But what do they do? Rather than them stand up and do anything in any way, shape or form to support Australians, support workers and support the nation, they want to come in here and say, 'We need to do this desperately. It's so important,' and 'it's so important, we're going to block it. We want to put it to a Senate committee and lock it away for ages.'”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
18 speakers · 9 support · 2 oppose · 1 mixed · 6 unclear
“Australians expect leadership, and all they have had are mixed messages. We want urgency. We want action. This is only one step, one small contribution to the action plan that we are expecting from government yet seeing so little of. There is concern about prices today, but there is more concern about what happens tomorrow. What happens when the food can't get to the supermarket because fuel prices are too high? What happens when our docks slow down and imports and exports slow dramatically? What happens when farmers stop harvesting or stop planting the next harvest because they're concerned they can't get access to either fertiliser or fuel? What happens when rubbish trucks stop picking up the rubbish from our bins, not just at our homes but at our hospitals and our aged-care centres?”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“That's what we're calling for. That's what we're brought to this place to do—to debate bills and hopefully create a better set of rules for Australia to work within. Instead of that opportunity being given to representatives of communities like mine, this government decided to ram that bill through underneath the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill, which we support. We came here and moved a suspension of standing orders to bring forward this legislation that they had been sitting on and boasting about. It was the only talking point that they could give when they were put under pressure and asked what they were going to do about the fuel supply crisis—'We're going to crack down.' So we said, 'Bring it on.' And the response, from a government whose integrity has been called into question time and time again and who refuse to stand and be held to account to the normal practices of parliament, has been absolutely disgusting. We've watched it here today.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Yes, we support doubling these penalties, but the ACCC takes time. They have to investigate cases. They have to create litigation. Australians need relief now. They need relief urgently. They are doing the maths right now on how they will get through Easter. I personally spoke to two trucking companies this week who are worried about going insolvent, and, when they go insolvent—they have customers who they deliver to. They go to Bunnings. They go to Woolies. They go to Coles. It's not just a bush issue. Right now, it may be. People in the cities might say, 'The worst thing that's happening to me is paying 200 bucks for a tank,' and that's pretty bad. But it could soon get much worse. When you start having road transport break down, you get shortages on supermarket shelves, you get unemployment spiking and you get inflation going through the roof.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We have been waiting patiently for the legislation. It finally arrived, it is straightforward and simple, and that's why we have no issue debating it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“There's a simple bill which will make a difference. Let's pass that, then let's look at the other bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The ACCC already has significant enforcement powers, and courts already impose serious penalties when misconduct is proven. That makes this government's delay impossible to explain, because if these tools existed all along then why did the government wait until Australians were paying record prices to act? The coalition's position is clear. We support strong enforcement. We support penalties that deter real misconduct. But we don't want to see enforcement being used to mask policy failure. That is why, while we will support this bill today, we will continue to hold the government to account for its failures in regard to this fuel crisis, because this is a real crisis that Australians are facing right now. It is a crisis that is affecting households, small businesses and entire sectors of the economy. As I say, for that reason the coalition is not going to obstruct necessary measures, but we are not going to stay silent while Australians pay record prices because this government acted too late, spoke too loosely and is now legislating after the fact.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Senator CASH (Western Australia—Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) (15:25): I too rise to support the bill before the Senate: the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026. We have been imploring the government, the Liberal Party and the National Party now, for over three weeks, to take action to assist Australians in managing what is now a fuel crisis across our country. Let's be very clear. At 4 o'clock today—because this bill will go through the Senate in 35 minutes—let's not pretend that this bill fixes the real problem that Australians have been telling the government they are facing for three weeks now.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition support the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026. We got it yesterday. We spent last night going through it. We looked for where all the sneaky by-lines normally are. We support it. We came in today and we offered the government an olive branch and said, 'We want to bring it on quickly—earlier—for debate so we can get it passed through here. Then it can go to the Senate and also go out into the community to make sure that big business and those fuel companies aren't ripping off the consumer.' That's what we did.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I invite the parliament to engage with us, either on the floor of parliament or behind the scenes. I don't care where we have the conversation, but let's start having a conversation about what fuel excise looks like, because we heard member after member on the other side come into this parliament and say, 'We step in when people need help.' Well, that's not help. Doubling the penalties is not help. It won't change the price at all. We need to do something. I'm suggesting the fuel excise has got far more ramification, far more of a sense of instant relief at the bowser—instant relief for my growers.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We've been very constructive in the sense that we've said, in relation to the first part of this legislation, that we're happy to provide some support. But the way it's been rushed is, again, characteristic of a government that is arrogant and out of touch.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“They've asked for the road user charge to be removed. Truckies are paying 32c a litre. The government could have removed that with a pen stroke and given immediate relief three weeks ago. It could allow higher productivity freight vehicles so you can move more kit to Coles and Woolworths, to shelves. We just need regulatory change. We need someone to sign a bit of paper. We can't get that done. NatRoad calls for cutting the road user charge. We need state-level owner-driver cost orders. The shipping industry needs the coastal trading act relaxed so that imports can move freight more efficiently. There are so many suggestions, including GST relief for our trucking industry—the tax on the tax. You could have done that on day 1. Instead, this government has taken four weeks to bring forward increasing the penalties of the ACCC. I've yet to see the ACCC prosecute anyone in the last four weeks. I don't know how many penalties they've actually handed out.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition today offers a broader warning. There is a genuine risk for an absolute economic earthquake if this is not addressed urgently, yet we see a complete failure to act. This government has introduced legislation but has not progressed it. They have failed entirely to act on essential price-gouging protections. This crisis is now visible in both our regional and urban areas. The core message from the coalition today is simple: this emergency is undeniably urgent and it is incredibly real. It is hitting vulnerable Australians exceptionally hard and immediate action is needed. Labor must finally prioritise our struggling families and our hardworking farmers. Right now, everyday Australians are unfairly paying the ultimate price for constant government delay and stubborn denial. We cannot afford to waste any more time engaging in empty political spin while regional towns suffer through these wildly inflated prices. This parliament should be completely focused on getting fuel flowing and getting prices firmly under control right now. We need real solutions to ensure no community is left behind.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Doubling the penalties for the ACCC is not going to be a success. Let's make sure the government enforces what's there— (Time expired)”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Labor government need to stop blaming Australians, and they need to take responsibility. What we have now is a panicked government who is making last-minute decisions to throw in legislation, of course, in an omnibus fashion—always. 'Let's throw this in, and let's throw that in.' And, if we, the opposition, don't approve it, then it's all on us.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So what about the bills before us here today, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026 and the Fair Work Amendment (Fairer Fuel) Bill 2026? Yes, the coalition is backing the doubling of penalties for the ACCC. This is tangible. Increasing the maximum penalty for anticompetitive behaviour and ensuring the price of misconduct is high enough to deter unfair activity is good. We must ensure consumers retain a robust level of protection. Yes, we support tougher penalties for those doing wrong, but the commission must also prosecute. We won't cop fuel gouging, but let's not forget to give confidence to the independent fuel retailers, who don't know where their next order is coming from or when. Doubling penalties won't help supply.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We had a media announcement 15 days ago, and that legislation only just turned up this week. It was the coalition who decided to be the adults in the room and say, 'Let's get this done today.' Because when I go home tonight, I really want to be able to say to my community, 'We did something in Canberra this week. We actually tried to help.' There have been some mentions of politicking on the other side. There are no politics in this. This is about the people of Australia. The minister at the table scoffs in a disgraceful fashion, showing an absolute complete disregard for the pain that people are feeling right across Australia. So I'm proud to have stood here today as a member of the coalition to get this done.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This issue is not just about price; it's about supply. We're seeing reports of fuel stations running dry. Access is being restricted. Regional urban communities like mine are being hit the hardest. On the Sunshine Coast, as I said, fishermen are telling me that they are struggling. They are having to put people off. This is not theoretical; this is happening now. This parliament needs to focus on getting fuel flowing and getting prices under control, and these bills— (Time expired)”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“"not declining to give the Fair Work Amendment (Fairer Fuel) Bill 2026 a second reading, the House:”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
3 speakers · 1 support · 2 oppose
“(ii) this bill will do nothing to stop fuel corporations from price gouging because it only increases penalties on existing offences, and”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Senator WATERS (Queensland—Leader of the Australian Greens) (15:30): This so-called crackdown on price gouging is a con. It will do nothing to stop price gouging, and it won't stop corporations using the cover of war to rip people off. It does not do what it says on the tin. This legislation increases penalties for companies caught lying about ripping you off, but it doesn't actually stop them from ripping you off, which it could do if the Greens' amendment passes. But let's see if that happens, because this government would rather just gaslight people about what it's doing and tinker around the edges than actually fix the problem. What is the point of stopping petrol companies lying about price gouging when you could simply stop them from price gouging in the first place? It is the ultimate window-dressing and will do nothing to fix the real pain that people are feeling.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Greens will be supporting the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026 in the House and reserving our position in the Senate. We also intend to support the passage of the Fair Work Amendment (Fairer Fuel) Bill 2026 in the House and reserve our position in the Senate. Labor's actually lying to you that they're tackling price gouging. All this ACCC bill does is increase penalties on existing offences—offences which have never in their history been used to crack down on fuel.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 1 oppose · 1 unclear
“I'll tell you where we're going to have a big crisis. We now have tractors that are unable to produce the food you need. They are basically sitting in a paddock because we can't get the supply of diesel. At the start, it was just like the fuel crisis: 'It won't matter, because there's stuff in storage.' But, as it starts to filter through and we can't get it to the marketplace—like we can't load cattle—you're going to start running out of food. We have got to have a plan. That's why I say that we must start rationing now. People aren't going to like it. People are going to be very upset by it. But it's better to show the people that you've got a plan, that you've worked out how much diesel is required and how much fuel is required, and that you'll work your way down through the most essential parts of your economy so they get the product first.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Our policy will cut fuel excise. Our policy will cut the GST paid on fuel. The Albanese government is profiting $300 million a month from the souring spike in fuel prices, while Australians are struggling. As the pain at the pump increases so too does the government's GST take on every litre. The government is taking 52.6c from every litre in excise tax and then applying a 10 per cent GST on top of the total sale. It's an absolute disgrace. We've seen the price of diesel double over the last few weeks, and that's if you can get it. The offences that this bill amends is to increase penalties that—guess what?—no-one has ever been charged under, not once. Zero multiplied by double is still zero. This bill won't do anything to crack down on the supply manipulation by big oil companies.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 1 support · 1 oppose
“The first piece of legislation before us, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill, is to ensure that there are greater consequences. A major part of laws and consequences for poor conduct is, ultimately, deterrence. The penalties must be significant to outweigh the benefits gained by price gouging. We need to build on that, which is what this piece of legislation does. It is designed—and I would of course have liked much more time to properly analyse it—to double the maximum penalties for false and misleading conduct and cartel behaviour, lifting the top penalty to $100 million per offence, while leaving in place the existing alternative penalty formulas, such as three times the value of the benefit obtained or 30 per cent of adjusted turnover, where applicable. While it's being sold politically in the context of the fuel price spike and the action of some retailers, it does sit alongside the broader package of reforms for a stronger ACCC, which I think is desperately needed to ensure Australians are properly protected.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“On the substance of the bills themselves, the first one is about doubling penalties—giving the ACCC the ability to double penalties for price gouging. Now, I don't think that this will change anything actually. I don't think there are many companies in the country who say, 'Well, if it's a $50 million penalty, we're going to go for broke. But if it's $100 million penalty, that gives us pause for thought.' In reality, this is a performative move to be seen to be actually doing something. It will not in any way change the ACCC's ability to actually prosecute price fixes; it just means the numbers are different at the end of that prosecution.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Committee of the Whole debate
Detailed Senate review
Senators examined the bill in detail and considered amendments clause by clause.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.