No new price-gouging offence
Higher maximum penalties apply only after an existing competition or consumer law breach is proved, leaving price gouging outside those offences untouched.
This bill became law on Mar 27th, 2026.
Budget, tax & economy
Companies involved in cartels or other serious anti-competitive conductBusiness behaviour that weakens fair competition. face a maximum fixed penaltyThe dollar-based part of a maximum penalty. of $100 million, up from $50 million.
The government said conflict in the Middle East had raised global oil and petrol prices, increasing pressure on motorists and families. It feared companies could exploit the disruption by misleading customers or working together to inflate prices. The government also cited an international economic review finding that Australia's competition penalties were low by global standards. It therefore doubled the fixed maximum from $50 million to $100 million as a stronger deterrent.
Australia already had competition and consumer laws, but maximum penalties for certain breaches were capped at $50 million. When war in the Middle East disrupted fuel supply chains, petrol prices rose and stations in some communities ran dry, adding pressure over possible price gouging and corporate misconduct; the government responded by introducing higher ACCCAustralia's competition and consumer watchdog. penalties, and Parliament passed the bill on 26 March 2026 before Royal AssentFormal approval that makes a bill law. on 27 March made the changes law.
Elizabeth Watson-Brown (Australian Greens) argued that the bill merely raises penalties for conduct already banned and does not create a general ban on excessive pricing. She said fuel companies could still raise prices without breaking these existing rules. Andrew Willcox (Liberal National Party) questioned how often the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, the national competition and consumer watchdog, had prosecuted such conduct. He argued that doubling penalties would achieve little without stronger enforcement.
Jim Chalmers MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 27 Mar 2026
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
3 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
2 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Companies involved in cartels or other serious anti-competitive conductBusiness behaviour that weakens fair competition. face a maximum fixed penaltyThe dollar-based part of a maximum penalty. of $100 million, up from $50 million.
Consumers gain stronger protection against misleading sales, bait advertising, pyramid schemes and unsafe products. The maximum fixed penaltyThe dollar-based part of a maximum penalty. doubles to $100 million.
Consumers and small businesses gain stronger protection from unfair terms in standard contracts. The maximum fixed penaltyThe dollar-based part of a maximum penalty. rises from $50 million to $100 million.
News, gas and electricity businesses face the higher $100 million maximum for specified serious breaches of industry rules.
Telecommunications companies breaking a competition rule for up to 21 days face $100 million plus $1 million for each day.
Telecommunications companies continuing that breach beyond 21 days face $121 million plus $3 million for each later day.
Companies are covered only for offences or other unlawful conduct occurring after the changes begin. The Act begins the day after royal approval.
1 Amendments of listed provisions Substituting references to $50,000,000 with references to $100,000,000 Paragraph 45AF(3)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 45AG(3)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 76(1B)(a) $100,000,000Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Act 2026
6 Amendments of listed provisions—Schedule 2 The provisions of Schedule 2 listed in the following table are amended as set out in the table. Substituting references to $50,000,000 with references to $100,000,000 Provision of Schedule 2 Paragraph 151(5)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 152(2A)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 153(3)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 154(5A)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 155(3)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 156(3)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 157(3A)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 158(10A)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 159(4)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 161(7)(a) $100,000,000 ParagTreasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Act 2026
Paragraph 203(9)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 204(4)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 224(3A)(a) $100,000,000Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Act 2026
1 Amendments of listed provisions Substituting references to $50,000,000 with references to $100,000,000 Paragraph 45AF(3)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 45AG(3)(a) $100,000,000 Paragraph 76(1B)(a) $100,000,000Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Act 2026
2 Subparagraph 151BX(3)(a)(i) Omit “$50 million”, substitute “$100 million”. 3 Subparagraph 151BX(3)(a)(ii) Omit “$71 million”, substitute “$121 million”.Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Act 2026
3 Subparagraph 151BX(3)(a)(ii) Omit “$71 million”, substitute “$121 million”.Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Act 2026
7 Application of amendments in items 1 to 4 The amendments made by items 1 to 4 of this Schedule apply in relation to: (a) offences committed; or (b) contraventions, or acts or omissions, that occurred; on or after the commencement of this Schedule. Competition and Consumer Act 2010 8 In the appropriate position in Part XIII 193 Application of amendments The amendments made by item 5 of Schedule 1 to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Act 2026 apply in relation to offences committed on or after the commencement of that Schedule. 9 In the appropriateTreasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Act 2026
Context
Australia already had competition and consumer laws, but maximum penalties for certain breaches were capped at $50 million. When war in the Middle East disrupted fuel supply chains, petrol prices rose and stations in some communities ran dry, adding pressure over possible price gouging and corporate misconduct; the government responded by introducing higher ACCCAustralia's competition and consumer watchdog. penalties, and Parliament passed the bill on 26 March 2026 before Royal AssentFormal approval that makes a bill law. on 27 March made the changes law.
War in the Middle East disrupts fuel supply chains
Speeches in Parliament said the conflict had disrupted global fuel supply chains and pushed up prices in Australia.
Hansard ↗Fuel shortages hit Australian communities
Members reported stations without fuel in Toowoomba, Wyreema and Dalby, with farmers, truck drivers and families unable to carry on normally.
Hansard ↗Jim Chalmers MP introduces the penalty bill
The bill proposed doubling maximum penalties for certain competition and consumer-law misconduct from $50 million to $100 million.
Hansard ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage and leaving Royal AssentFormal approval that makes a bill law. as the final step.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal AssentFormal approval that makes a bill law. turns the bill into law
The Governor-General's assent converted the bill into an Act, with the higher penalties applying to conduct occurring from the following day.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentFormal approval that makes a bill law., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
Elizabeth Watson-Brown (Australian Greens) argued that the bill merely raises penalties for conduct already banned and does not create a general ban on excessive pricing. She said fuel companies could still raise prices without breaking these existing rules. Andrew Willcox (Liberal National Party) questioned how often the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, the national competition and consumer watchdog, had prosecuted such conduct. He argued that doubling penalties would achieve little without stronger enforcement.
The Greens said they would support the bill in the House, despite seeking a broader ban on excessive pricing. Coalition speakers also supported the higher penalties, while warning that penalties would not quickly increase fuel supplies or provide immediate relief.
No new price-gouging offence
Higher maximum penalties apply only after an existing competition or consumer law breach is proved, leaving price gouging outside those offences untouched.
Deterrence and scrutiny doubts
The bill was described as performative because larger maximum penalties may achieve little without improving the ACCCAustralia's competition and consumer watchdog.’s capacity to prosecute wrongdoing; its rushed consideration also limited scrutiny.
Permanent response to a temporary crisis
A proposed House amendment sought an explanation for making the higher penalties permanent when the measure was presented as a response to a temporary fuel crisis.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Recorded amendment and procedural votes grouped by chamber. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.
House
Moved by Ben Small (Liberal Party). Defeated 43 to 93. Support came from Liberal, Nationals, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The vote rejected a proposed criticism of the companion fuel bill and did not alter the ACCCAustralia's competition and consumer watchdog. penalties bill itself.
Did not vote: Liberal Party, LNP, Nationals
Senate
Defeated 10 to 25. Support came from Greens and Australia's Voice. Opposition came from Labor and Liberal.
This was the Senate's only counted vote at the second reading stage; the bill was then read a second time on the voices.
Did not vote: Liberal Party
Moved by Nick McKim (Greens). Defeated 11 to 26. Support came from Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, and Nationals.
The bill was reported without this change and subsequently passed, making this its only counted Senate committee-stage vote.
Did not vote: Liberal Party
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Chalmers supports the bill, saying doubled maximum penalties will empower the ACCCAustralia's competition and consumer watchdog. to punish fuel companies and other businesses that exploit conflicts to impose illegal and unfair prices on Australians.
Read in Hansard ↗Whitten opposes the bill as ineffective, arguing that doubling penalties under offences that have never been prosecuted will not stop fuel supply manipulation by large oil companies.
Read in Hansard ↗Steggall supports the bill because doubling maximum penalties would strengthen deterrence against price gouging, misleading conduct and cartel behaviour, although she criticises the rushed process and lack of scrutiny.
Read in Hansard ↗Kate Chaney argues the bill is a performative measure that is unlikely to deter wrongdoing or improve the ACCCAustralia's competition and consumer watchdog.'s ability to prosecute price fixing, and criticises the lack of proper scrutiny.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
19 speakers · 20 contributions · 18 support · 1 unclear
“The even stronger penalties that we are introducing will empower the ACCC to throw the book at any companies who illegally and unfairly increase their prices.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Katy Gallagher on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Gallagher supports the bill, arguing that doubling maximum competition and consumer law penalties to $100 million will strengthen ACCCAustralia's competition and consumer watchdog. enforcement against companies that illegally exploit Australians through unfair pricing.
“The even stronger penalties we are introducing will empower the ACCC to throw the book at any companies who illegally and unfairly increase their prices.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Gallagher strongly supports passing the bill, arguing that doubling maximum penalties for misleading conduct and cartel behaviour will help the ACCCAustralia's competition and consumer watchdog. combat price gouging and other anticompetitive conduct amid economic disruption from the Middle East conflict.
“The bill doubles the penalties for false or misleading conduct and cartel behaviour to a maximum of $100 million per offence. This is an important part of our response to some of the impacts we are seeing flow through to our economy as a result of the Middle East conflict. These laws will help to tackle price gouging at its source, outlawing false or misleading representations, including lying about the reasons for price increases; price fixing, colluding on prices and other cartel behaviour; misuse of market power to lessen competition, including by refusing to supply to third parties like independent fuel retailers; unfair contract terms, especially in relation to business-to-business conduct, to stop big businesses pushing around small and family businesses; exclusive dealings that reduce competition; and unconscionable conduct, like taking advantage of vulnerable people.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“The legislation before the chamber is really important for Australian consumers because no new ideas and no constructive suggestions have happened from those opposite on the fuel issues and the challenges we're facing from the war in the Middle East—nothing from those opposite, just whinging and moaning and carping all the time. The conflict overseas has had an impact, and it's not an excuse to rip off Australians at service stations and at bowsers. It is simply not. We need to clamp down. I'm pleased the ACCC, in March this year, investigated a number of companies in relation to this issue. We need these higher penalties for petrol companies who do the wrong thing. That's why we're doing what we're doing. That's no excuse to jack up prices and rip off Australians.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Let's be very clear: what this legislation, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026, is very clear about is that those global pressures are not an excuse for misconduct. They are not an excuse for misleading conduct or price manipulation, and they're certainly not an excuse for big corporations to treat Australian consumers like mugs. That's why the bill doubles penalties for those who do the wrong thing, lifting maximum penalties to $100 million per offence, because, if you're looking to rip off Australians, there should be real consequences for it. I'm certain that in my community people expect nothing less. I really understand that, at the moment, households in my community and others are doing all they can to manage their costs. People are shopping around. They are budgeting carefully. When they are doing this, the least they can expect is that the system is fair and that companies are playing by the rules. That is what we are achieving with this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Fuel companies know this, and there are so many patriotic Australians in the fuel sector who take that responsibility seriously. But what the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026 does is ensure that the bad actors who are seeking to make a quick buck off the volatility that international conflict has brought to 2026 are held accountable for their responsibilities. When petrol prices move, households feel it immediately. When prices spike without explanation, people notice. When people suspect they are being taken advantage of, trust in the system erodes quickly. This legislation is about restoring and protecting that trust.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026 doubles the maximum penalties for serious breaches of competition and consumer law from $50 million to $100 million per offence for false or misleading conduct or cartel behaviour across the country. We have already acted in this space. We increased penalties fivefold to up to $50 million and strengthened the powers of the ACCC, including extending petrol price monitoring enabling on-the-spot fines. But this legislation goes further. It ensures even bigger penalties for servos and suppliers who are ripping off Australian motorists.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Importantly, this bill does not alter the independent role of the Fair Work Commission. It respects that role. The commission will continue to assess applications and make decisions independently, but this bill will ensure that in times of crisis it can act with urgency. This legislation builds on the significant steps the government has already taken to respond to this fuel crisis. We've acted quickly to protect Australians, doubling penalties for petrol price gouging and really teething up the ACCC to increase monitoring, enforcement and crackdown. We've acted to stabilise supply, releasing a portion of Australia's fuel reserves. We've adjusted the fuel standards to increase availability. And we've been working with our international partners to ensure that those ships keep coming. We're a reliable partner with LNG and coal, and they know they need to reciprocate those deals—and they are—but we're working constructively with them.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We are a party that fights for workers, and we fight for transport workers. When it comes to fuel price hikes, we will not back down. These surging costs are felt right across the community, including by everyday Aussies in my community, who are feeling the surge in petrol prices. That's why we're also introducing new legislation to double penalties for petrol companies that are price gouging. What petrol companies are doing to inflate prices at servos in my community, across our cities and, in particular, in regional Australia must stop. We won't cop corporations taking advantage of Aussie consumers, and conflict overseas is no excuse. My message to my community in Melbourne's western suburbs is: when you go to the servo you deserve a fair go at the petrol pump, and any corporations that engage in misconduct, ripping you off, should face bigger penalties. We've already increased penalties up to $50 million—five times higher than they were before—and we've given the ACCC more tools, like extending petrol price monitoring powers and the ability to issue on-the-spot fines.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Let's look at the practical things that the Albanese government is doing. One is the new legislation to provide for bigger penalties for misconduct in the fuel sector to help consumers get a fair go at the petrol pump. The conflict overseas should never be an excuse to profit off Australians. We're putting petrol companies on notice and this Treasury laws amendment to double the penalties does literally that. It doubles the penalties for false or misleading conduct and cartel behaviour to a maximum of $100 million per offence across the economy. We'd already increased penalties to $50 million—that's five times higher than what they were when we came to government—and we've given the ACCC more tools, such as extending petrol price monitoring powers and the ability to issue on-the-spot fines. This is a really important step, and it comes on top of the other action we're taking to address fuel affordability and security.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This legislation is exactly designed for the moment. These two bills are designed to do two things. As the member for Cook indicated earlier—and Deputy Speaker Buchholz yourself, who was heavily involved in trucking, like my neighbour. I know firsthand, from working in construction and running a construction business, how important those fuel costs are and how important it is that we get those deliveries on time. So these pieces of legislation deal with that. They give certainty to truckies that they're going to be able to negotiate a fair deal that's going to be able to keep their trucks moving and get those materials delivered to site or the goods delivered to supermarkets. The other thing it does as well is it gives powers to the government and the ACCC to actually properly prosecute companies that are profiteering out of this. We know—as if the member for Cook was telling us something we don't know!—what is going on out there, but the difference between us and the opposition is that we're acting on it, and they're point scoring. We're out there taking effective measures; they're out there collecting data and asking for people's emails. We're out there acting in the national interest, and they're out there acting in what they think is their very narrow political interest.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“At the centre of that response is protecting consumers from being ripped off. So we've introduced the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill, which operates to double penalties for serious misconduct, lifting maximum penalties for false or misleading conduct to $100 million per offence. Let me be clear: the conflict overseas is not an excuse to profit from Australians, so we're putting the fuel sector on notice. We will not accept big corporates treating Australian motorists unfairly, and that's why we're empowering the ACCC to ramp up fuel price monitoring and issue on-the-spot fines. We are calling on those opposite to support this legislation and stand with Australian consumers.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The other piece, of course, is the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026. This allows penalties of up to $100 million for those who are found to be in breach of the Treasury Laws Amendment Act by the ACCC. It works quite simply as a deterrent to stop businesses from price-gouging Australian citizens. Obviously, everyone in this chamber supports the ACCC in pursuing anyone found to be doing these things. In response to the fuel price increases, we have raised this to $50 million and now again here to $100 million to ensure that we've got legislation and that the CQC is empowered to support Australians and prevent them being taken advantage of by companies who want to do these things.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“When it comes to our fairer fuel bill and doubling penalties for ACCC enforcement, it is essential that, in order to support our trucking companies and in order to support everyday Territorians and everyday Aussies, these companies are held to account, and maximising the fines will provide an effective disincentive. Despite what some opposite have said, there have been huge fines handed out to petrol companies that have done the wrong thing, and that will continue and be much harsher now.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026 is a clear statement of intent. It doubles penalties for false or misleading conduct and for cartel behaviour to a maximum of $100 million per offence. Our job is to act in the best interests of Australians, and that is what we are doing here today. We know people are doing it tough. We know it's a hard slog. These bills are our work to improve the lives of everyone in this country.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“That is exactly what this legislation delivers. The bill doubles the maximum penalties for false or misleading conduct and cartel behaviour to $100 million per offence. That's not a slap on the wrist; those are actual consequences. We've already increased penalties fivefold under this government to $50 million because we understood that weak penalties are no deterrent for big corporations turning over billions of dollars. Our bill goes further still because the Albanese government is serious about accountability. The Iran war has introduced genuine volatility into global oil markets. What happens in the Middle East affects what Australians pay at the bowser. That is a reality that we must acknowledge, and those opposite know this, despite what they are saying. We're putting fuel companies on notice today, and this government will not cop price gouging.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“While those opposite play political games, stunts, by calling on this legislation to be urgently passed—'very urgent' we heard from the last speaker—those in the other place on their side are referring it to a committee. Then, when we put it to a vote here, they voted against it anyway. Those opposite are playing very badly strategically planned stunts while this government has the backs of all Australians, and I'd call on those opposite to stop the stunts and stop the games. This is urgent. We need to get it through. You need to vote for it. You need to tell those in the other place that they need to vote for it as well. This is an urgent thing, and we really need all of us. We're elected to look after Australians. We all need to do what is right for our constituents and get this legislation through.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise today to speak in strong support of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026. In the electorate of Bullwinkel, our community spans from the hills to the valleys and out into the regional hubs, so, for my constituents, the cost of living isn't a theoretical debate; it's a daily reality for them, particularly so every time they pull up to a petrol pump. They deserve a fair go and they deserve to know that the laws of this land are strong enough to protect them from corporate misconduct. This bill is very simple. The punishment must fit the crime. Fines act as a deterrent. If a corporation decides to put its profits above the law, the penalty should not be seen as a mere cost of doing business; it should be a significant deterrent that stops them in their tracks.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“There are two key pieces of legislation that we are talking about today. The first bill, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026, is about doubling penalties. No-one should be taking advantage, on a commercial basis, of people who are struggling to put fuel in their cars. The first bill gives effect to what the Treasurer and the assistant minister announced on 11 March—to double the ACCC's enforcement penalties, including for false and misleading conduct and for cartel behaviour, to a maximum of $100 million per offence. The second bill, the Fair Work Amendment (Fairer Fuel) Bill 2026, gives truckies a fair go and makes sure that our truck drivers aren't disadvantaged by a significant issue in our community. Our road transport industry is vital to keeping our nation moving and to keeping our economy running—and that's what the second bill does. Without trucks and without their drivers, the movement of essential supplies across Australia stops—and we can't have that. We need to look after our drivers. We need to give them a fair go.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The fact of the matter is that we have more supplies than we've ever had before. It's available; the distribution is the problem. They know it's the problem. It's because people are hoarding fuel, and more and more fuel needs to go out. That's where the blockage is. But what do they do? Rather than them stand up and do anything in any way, shape or form to support Australians, support workers and support the nation, they want to come in here and say, 'We need to do this desperately. It's so important,' and 'it's so important, we're going to block it. We want to put it to a Senate committee and lock it away for ages.'”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
18 speakers · 12 support · 2 oppose · 4 unclear
“This crisis is urgent and real. It's hitting Australians right now. The government needs to do one thing. It's got one job, and that is to get fuel flowing. Its priorities are all wrong. This is just going to touch the sides. It's only going to scratch the surface.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I go back to this point: the reason we called for the ACCC enforcement bill to be brought forward was that we come from communities where we're seeing these problems. We're talking to these people. We're hearing from business owners who simply cannot afford the additional cashflow that an extra dollar per litre is putting on them. That's why we called to bring this forward. We're trying to look after our communities and we have a government who won't do anything.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Yes, we support doubling these penalties, but the ACCC takes time. They have to investigate cases. They have to create litigation. Australians need relief now. They need relief urgently. They are doing the maths right now on how they will get through Easter. I personally spoke to two trucking companies this week who are worried about going insolvent, and, when they go insolvent—they have customers who they deliver to. They go to Bunnings. They go to Woolies. They go to Coles. It's not just a bush issue. Right now, it may be. People in the cities might say, 'The worst thing that's happening to me is paying 200 bucks for a tank,' and that's pretty bad. But it could soon get much worse. When you start having road transport break down, you get shortages on supermarket shelves, you get unemployment spiking and you get inflation going through the roof.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is in comparison to the schedules that are being updated in the context of the Competition and Consumer Act which are focused very squarely on making sure penalties are imposed on those who seek to price gouge or harm Australians. It's a straightforward exercise that they have dawdled on every step of the way. The response from the minister has been to not bring the legislation to the House, to bring it to a vote to resolve the matter and to up the penalties, but instead he has allowed time to drift. We are simply asking that that matter, which is simple, straightforward and clear, be resolved. Instead, what the government is now doing is a shambolic process to try and shut down parliamentary scrutiny and parliamentary accountability. I'll remind the House this Fair Work legislation was introduced this morning. A copy has not even, as far as I am aware, been made available to the opposition—or, if it has, we certainly haven't had the chance to read it yet. When you're making such substantial changes to industrial relations legislation—and I know the Labor Party works for the trade union movement; it doesn't work for Australians—at some point you actually have to factor Australians into the conversation.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The ACCC already has significant enforcement powers, and courts already impose serious penalties when misconduct is proven. That makes this government's delay impossible to explain, because if these tools existed all along then why did the government wait until Australians were paying record prices to act? The coalition's position is clear. We support strong enforcement. We support penalties that deter real misconduct. But we don't want to see enforcement being used to mask policy failure. That is why, while we will support this bill today, we will continue to hold the government to account for its failures in regard to this fuel crisis, because this is a real crisis that Australians are facing right now. It is a crisis that is affecting households, small businesses and entire sectors of the economy. As I say, for that reason the coalition is not going to obstruct necessary measures, but we are not going to stay silent while Australians pay record prices because this government acted too late, spoke too loosely and is now legislating after the fact.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition support the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026. We got it yesterday. We spent last night going through it. We looked for where all the sneaky by-lines normally are. We support it. We came in today and we offered the government an olive branch and said, 'We want to bring it on quickly—earlier—for debate so we can get it passed through here. Then it can go to the Senate and also go out into the community to make sure that big business and those fuel companies aren't ripping off the consumer.' That's what we did.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We made an offer of bipartisanship to say: 'The ACCC bill is very simple. Let's get it through the House into the Senate.' Yet what do we get? Once again, all you want to do is play politics. I ask you to please remember what is happening out there in the community. People are hurting. People are concerned. People are worried. They're worried about the secondary impacts of this fuel crisis. They're wondering about what it's going to mean for when they go into the supermarket—what it's going to mean for vegetable prices and what it's going to mean for meat prices. They worry every time they go and fill the car up: 'That $100 note or that $50 note—how many litres is it now going to get me? It won't get me enough.'”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I too rise to support the bill before the Senate: the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026. We have been imploring the government, the Liberal Party and the National Party now, for over three weeks, to take action to assist Australians in managing what is now a fuel crisis across our country. Let's be very clear. At 4 o'clock today—because this bill will go through the Senate in 35 minutes—let's not pretend that this bill fixes the real problem that Australians have been telling the government they are facing for three weeks now.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I invite the parliament to engage with us, either on the floor of parliament or behind the scenes. I don't care where we have the conversation, but let's start having a conversation about what fuel excise looks like, because we heard member after member on the other side come into this parliament and say, 'We step in when people need help.' Well, that's not help. Doubling the penalties is not help. It won't change the price at all. We need to do something. I'm suggesting the fuel excise has got far more ramification, far more of a sense of instant relief at the bowser—instant relief for my growers.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“As the coalition, we will definitely scrutinise this legislation, especially in the Senate. But the way it has been put through today is characteristic of this government. We're approaching Easter, a time that is very special to Australians. But what are we going to actually see? We're going to see an increase in holiday cancellations. We're seeing families who have probably been looking forward to travel after working very hard but being unable to travel and take time with their families. We need a government who is not only prepared to act but prepared to act in a way such that we can work with them. We've been very constructive in the sense that we've said, in relation to the first part of this legislation, that we're happy to provide some support. But the way it's been rushed is, again, characteristic of a government that is arrogant and out of touch.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition today offers a broader warning. There is a genuine risk for an absolute economic earthquake if this is not addressed urgently, yet we see a complete failure to act. This government has introduced legislation but has not progressed it. They have failed entirely to act on essential price-gouging protections. This crisis is now visible in both our regional and urban areas. The core message from the coalition today is simple: this emergency is undeniably urgent and it is incredibly real. It is hitting vulnerable Australians exceptionally hard and immediate action is needed. Labor must finally prioritise our struggling families and our hardworking farmers. Right now, everyday Australians are unfairly paying the ultimate price for constant government delay and stubborn denial. We cannot afford to waste any more time engaging in empty political spin while regional towns suffer through these wildly inflated prices. This parliament should be completely focused on getting fuel flowing and getting prices firmly under control right now. We need real solutions to ensure no community is left behind.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Doubling the penalties for the ACCC is not going to be a success. Let's make sure the government enforces what's there— (Time expired)”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to speak to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026, in the very small amount of time allotted to this chamber, to debate a bill where we actually seek to increase the penalties available to the ACCC. But what I'd like to have seen, as we enter the fourth week of this fuel crisis, is the ACCC on the streets, checking up on local servos, knocking on the doors of the big four fuel suppliers and launching investigations into how the market was operating and whether gouging was occurring. Was there unconscionable behaviour when there were rumours of hedging and hoarding of fuel?”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Today I just got off the phone from one of the farmers. He happens to have a small fuel depot in Robinvale. He has just told me that he's talked to citrus growers in my electorate who are literally in the process of deciding whether they will take the fruit off the tree to deliver to market or not. We hear today that one in five farmers is making the decision not to sow a crop. What is this Labor government doing about it? Well, you know what? They're panic legislating, finally getting the ACCC to do their job, and they're allowing truckies to put their prices up according to the fuel they're paying for. Great! Guess what. There is a flow-on effect, Labor. Prime Minister Albanese needs to understand that, if people cannot afford their groceries and they cannot afford vegetables, they won't buy them. Guess what happens when Australians don't eat fresh vegetables and fruit. You know what. They get sick. So our health prices will also go up.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So what about the bills before us here today, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026 and the Fair Work Amendment (Fairer Fuel) Bill 2026? Yes, the coalition is backing the doubling of penalties for the ACCC. This is tangible. Increasing the maximum penalty for anticompetitive behaviour and ensuring the price of misconduct is high enough to deter unfair activity is good. We must ensure consumers retain a robust level of protection. Yes, we support tougher penalties for those doing wrong, but the commission must also prosecute. We won't cop fuel gouging, but let's not forget to give confidence to the independent fuel retailers, who don't know where their next order is coming from or when. Doubling penalties won't help supply.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We had a media announcement 15 days ago, and that legislation only just turned up this week. It was the coalition who decided to be the adults in the room and say, 'Let's get this done today.' Because when I go home tonight, I really want to be able to say to my community, 'We did something in Canberra this week. We actually tried to help.' There have been some mentions of politicking on the other side. There are no politics in this. This is about the people of Australia. The minister at the table scoffs in a disgraceful fashion, showing an absolute complete disregard for the pain that people are feeling right across Australia. So I'm proud to have stood here today as a member of the coalition to get this done.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This issue is not just about price; it's about supply. We're seeing reports of fuel stations running dry. Access is being restricted. Regional urban communities like mine are being hit the hardest. On the Sunshine Coast, as I said, fishermen are telling me that they are struggling. They are having to put people off. This is not theoretical; this is happening now. This parliament needs to focus on getting fuel flowing and getting prices under control, and these bills— (Time expired)”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I move an amendment to the amendment moved by Ms Watson-Brown, as circulated in my name:”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
3 speakers · 2 support · 1 mixed
“(ii) this bill will do nothing to stop fuel corporations from price gouging because it only increases penalties on existing offences, and”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This so-called crackdown on price gouging is a con. It will do nothing to stop price gouging, and it won't stop corporations using the cover of war to rip people off. It does not do what it says on the tin. This legislation increases penalties for companies caught lying about ripping you off, but it doesn't actually stop them from ripping you off, which it could do if the Greens' amendment passes. But let's see if that happens, because this government would rather just gaslight people about what it's doing and tinker around the edges than actually fix the problem. What is the point of stopping petrol companies lying about price gouging when you could simply stop them from price gouging in the first place? It is the ultimate window-dressing and will do nothing to fix the real pain that people are feeling.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Greens will be supporting the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026 in the House and reserving our position in the Senate. We also intend to support the passage of the Fair Work Amendment (Fairer Fuel) Bill 2026 in the House and reserve our position in the Senate. Labor's actually lying to you that they're tackling price gouging. All this ACCC bill does is increase penalties on existing offences—offences which have never in their history been used to crack down on fuel.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 1 oppose · 1 unclear
“We're hearing the word now, aren't we? We're hearing the word 'crisis'. It took a little while before they started saying 'crisis', but by gosh we're hearing it a lot now. And we're hearing the word 'urgency'. It took a little bit of time before they started saying the word 'urgency', but we're hearing the word a lot now. And of course what we're seeing is that they're rushing forward a bill. Do you know why they rush bills forward? It's because they're panicking, because they're not across the situation.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Our policy will cut fuel excise. Our policy will cut the GST paid on fuel. The Albanese government is profiting $300 million a month from the souring spike in fuel prices, while Australians are struggling. As the pain at the pump increases so too does the government's GST take on every litre. The government is taking 52.6c from every litre in excise tax and then applying a 10 per cent GST on top of the total sale. It's an absolute disgrace. We've seen the price of diesel double over the last few weeks, and that's if you can get it. The offences that this bill amends is to increase penalties that—guess what?—no-one has ever been charged under, not once. Zero multiplied by double is still zero. This bill won't do anything to crack down on the supply manipulation by big oil companies.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 1 support · 1 unclear
“The first piece of legislation before us, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill, is to ensure that there are greater consequences. A major part of laws and consequences for poor conduct is, ultimately, deterrence. The penalties must be significant to outweigh the benefits gained by price gouging. We need to build on that, which is what this piece of legislation does. It is designed—and I would of course have liked much more time to properly analyse it—to double the maximum penalties for false and misleading conduct and cartel behaviour, lifting the top penalty to $100 million per offence, while leaving in place the existing alternative penalty formulas, such as three times the value of the benefit obtained or 30 per cent of adjusted turnover, where applicable. While it's being sold politically in the context of the fuel price spike and the action of some retailers, it does sit alongside the broader package of reforms for a stronger ACCC, which I think is desperately needed to ensure Australians are properly protected.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“On the substance of the bills themselves, the first one is about doubling penalties—giving the ACCC the ability to double penalties for price gouging. Now, I don't think that this will change anything actually. I don't think there are many companies in the country who say, 'Well, if it's a $50 million penalty, we're going to go for broke. But if it's $100 million penalty, that gives us pause for thought.' In reality, this is a performative move to be seen to be actually doing something. It will not in any way change the ACCC's ability to actually prosecute price fixes; it just means the numbers are different at the end of that prosecution.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Committee of the Whole debate
Committee of the Whole debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentFormal approval that makes a bill law., turning the bill into an Act.