Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment

Current status

This bill became law on Jun 30th, 2026.

Policy area

Transport & communications

What does this bill do?

Northern Australian projects can seek new financing decisions until 30 June 2036, up from 30 June 2026.

Why was it introduced?

The government said the Northern Australia Infrastructure FacilityA government lender for northern infrastructure projects., a $7 billion government lender for northern projects, helps overcome distance, severe weather and gaps in commercial finance. Minister Madeleine King (Labor) said it had made 37 investment decisions worth more than $4.3 billion, supporting projects forecast to create more than 18,000 jobs. The government said the extension would keep that financing available and give investors and communities greater certainty.

Broader context

Created in 2016 to help finance infrastructure and economic development across northern Australia, the Northern Australia Infrastructure FacilityA government lender for northern infrastructure projects. faced the end of its power to make investment decisions on 30 June 2026. A 2024 independent review, tabled in Parliament on 27 August 2025, recommended updated oversight, prompting Hon Madeleine King MP to introduce the 2026 amendment; after Royal Assent on 30 June 2026, NAIF's decision-making period was extended to 30 June 2036, with ministerial corrective powers and reviews due after 30 June 2029 and 30 June 2034.

Key criticism

Zali Steggall (Independent) argued the bill left the facility open to financing fossil-fuel infrastructure and did not require decisions to follow Australia’s climate targets. She also said it did not clearly require consultation with First Nations Australians. Elizabeth Watson-Brown (Australian Greens) opposed the bill unless it barred financing for coal, gas and native-forest logging. Melissa Price (Liberal) supported the bill but argued the facility should operate permanently, instead of receiving a 10-year extension.

Who supported it?

Hon Madeleine King MP introduced this bill. It passed with support from Labor, One Nation, Liberal Party, Liberal, some crossbench members; opposed by Greens.

Introduced in House 04 Mar 2026
Passed House 11 Mar 2026
Passed Senate 30 June 2026 Aye 29 No 10
Became law 30 June 2026

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 30 June 2026

Final passage

Recorded final vote

1 counted final-passage vote was recorded.

Passage speed

118 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Northern Australian projects can seek new financing decisions until 30 June 2036, up from 30 June 2026.

  2. The facility’s board must tell both responsible ministersThe Northern Australia and Finance ministers. when it breaks its government-set investment rules. It must also explain its proposed fix.

  3. The responsible ministersThe Northern Australia and Finance ministers. can order the board to explain a breach and fix it within set periods. The board must obey.

  4. Borrowers and project partners keep valid transactions even when the facility breaks its investment rules or a ministerial direction.

  5. The Northern Australia and Finance ministers will jointly oversee board appointments, leave, meetings and related governance matters.

  6. Northern Australian communities get two future reviews of the facility’s governing law, after 30 June 2029 and 30 June 2034.

Show source excerpts
  1. Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Act 2016 Omit “30 June 2026” (wherever occurring), substitute “30 June 2036”.
    Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment Act 2026
  2. 3 After subsection 9(3) (3A) As soon as practicable after the Board becomes aware that the Facility or one of its subsidiaries has failed to comply with the Investment Mandate, the Board must give the responsible Ministers a written statement: (a) informing the responsible Ministers; and (b) setting out the action that the Facility proposes to take in order to ensure that the Facility or subsidiary complies with the Investment Mandate.
    Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment Act 2026
  3. (3B) If the responsible Ministers are satisfied that the Facility or one of its subsidiaries has failed to comply with the Investment Mandate, the responsible Ministers may (whether or not the Board has given the responsible Ministers a statement under subsection (3A)), by written notice given to the Board, direct the Board: (a) to give the responsible Ministers, within a period specified in the notice, a written explanation; and (b) to take action specified in the notice, within a period specified in the notice, in order to ensure that the Facility or subsidiary complies with the Investment
    Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment Act 2026
  4. (3D) A failure to comply with: (a) the Investment Mandate; or (b) a direction under subsection (3B); does not affect the validity of any transaction.
    Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment Act 2026
  5. 4 Sections 15 and 16 Omit “Minister”, substitute “responsible Ministers”. 5 Subsection 17(4) Omit “Minister”, substitute “responsible Ministers”. 6 Subsection 18(1) Omit all the words after “appointed member,”, substitute “the responsible Ministers may grant leave of absence to the Chair on the terms and conditions that the responsible Ministers determine”. 7 Section 19 Omit “Minister”, substitute “responsible Ministers”. 8 Section 20 Omit “Minister” (wherever occurring), substitute “responsible Ministers”. 9 Subsection 21(1) Omit “Minister may”, substitute “responsible Ministers ma
    Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment Act 2026
  6. 13 Section 43 Repeal the section, substitute: 43 Reviews of operation of Act (1) The Minister must cause a review of the operation of this Act to commence as soon as practicable after: (a) 30 June 2029; and (b) 30 June 2034. (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the review mentioned in paragraph (1)(b) must consider: (a) whether the time limit of 30 June 2036 set out in section 8 for making decisions to provide financial assistance should be extended; and (b) the appropriate governance arrangements for the Facility after that date. (3) The persons undertaking a review must give the Min
    Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment Act 2026

Broader context for this bill

Created in 2016 to help finance infrastructure and economic development across northern Australia, the Northern Australia Infrastructure FacilityA government lender for northern infrastructure projects. faced the end of its power to make investment decisions on 30 June 2026. A 2024 independent review, tabled in Parliament on 27 August 2025, recommended updated oversight, prompting Hon Madeleine King MP to introduce the 2026 amendment; after Royal Assent on 30 June 2026, NAIF's decision-making period was extended to 30 June 2036, with ministerial corrective powers and reviews due after 30 June 2029 and 30 June 2034.

  1. 2016

    Northern Australia Infrastructure FacilityA government lender for northern infrastructure projects. is established

    The Turnbull government established the $7 billion facility to support investment, jobs and economic development across northern Australia.

    Hansard ↗
  2. 27 Aug 2025

    Independent review of NAIF is tabled

    The independent review, chaired by Warren Snowdon with Peter Yu and Lisa Caffery, was tabled in Parliament and the bill later responded to its recommendations for updated oversight.

    Hansard ↗
  3. 04 Mar 2026

    Hon Madeleine King MP introduces the bill

    With NAIF's investment decision-making authority due to expire on 30 June 2026, Hon Madeleine King MP introduced the bill to extend its period and strengthen oversight.

    Hansard ↗
  4. 30 June 2026

    Parliament passes the bill

    Both houses passed the bill and the Governor-General gave Royal Assent, extending NAIF's investment decision-making period to 30 June 2036.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  5. 30 June 2026

    The Act adds compliance and review checkpoints

    The enacted changes require the Board to notify ministers about Investment MandateGovernment-set rules guiding the facility’s investments. breaches, allow corrective directions, and require reviews after 30 June 2029 and 30 June 2034.

    Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment explanatory memorandum ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 04 Mar 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 04 Mar 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 10 Mar 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Sent to Federation Chamber for debate 10 Mar 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Referred to Federation Chamber

Second reading debate 11 Mar 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

House second reading agreed 11 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Consideration in detail 11 Mar 2026

The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.

Consideration in detail debate

Returned from Federation Chamber 11 Mar 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Reported from Federation Chamber

Consideration in detail 11 Mar 2026

The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.

Consideration in detail debate

House third reading agreed 11 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 12 Mar 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 12 Mar 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 30 June 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate second reading agreed Aye 28 No 10 30 June 2026

Recorded vote: 28 to 10.

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Committee of the Whole debate 30 June 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate third reading agreed Aye 29 No 10 30 June 2026

Recorded vote: 29 to 10.

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Passed both houses 30 June 2026

Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.

Finally passed both Houses

Assent 30 June 2026

The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.

The main case against this bill

Zali Steggall (Independent) argued the bill left the facility open to financing fossil-fuel infrastructure and did not require decisions to follow Australia’s climate targets. She also said it did not clearly require consultation with First Nations Australians. Elizabeth Watson-Brown (Australian Greens) opposed the bill unless it barred financing for coal, gas and native-forest logging. Melissa Price (Liberal) supported the bill but argued the facility should operate permanently, instead of receiving a 10-year extension.

The government said the facility’s investment rules already ask it to support sustainability and climate solutions. The minister also argued the bill improves oversight, while the final Act schedules reviews after 30 June 2029 and 30 June 2034.

Environmentally harmful projects

The bill does not prohibit financial assistance for coal and gas extraction, related pipelines or native-forest logging, creating a risk that public money supports environmentally damaging projects.

Raised by The Australian Greens, including Elizabeth Watson-Brown Source ↗

Missing climate and consultation safeguards

Extending the Facility without requiring alignment with climate law or consultation with First Nations communities could worsen climate risks and allow affected communities too little say in funded developments.

Raised by Independent Mp Zali Steggall Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The chamber-passage votes come first. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

11 Mar 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Carried

Senate passed the bill

Aye 29 No 10

Passed 29 to 10. Support came from Labor, One Nation, Liberal Party, Liberal, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Greens.

30 June 2026

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 20 / 0
Greens 0 / 10
One Nation 4 / 0
Independent 1 / 0
Liberal Party 1 / 0
Liberal 1 / 0
Nationals 1 / 0
UAP 1 / 0

Earlier bill-stage votes

Carried

Senate cleared second reading

Aye 28 No 10

Passed 28 to 10. Support came from Labor, One Nation, Liberal, Nationals, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Greens.

30 June 2026

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 19 / 0
Greens 0 / 10
One Nation 4 / 0
Liberal 3 / 0
Independent 1 / 0
Nationals 1 / 0
Carried

Keep the bill unchanged after proposed amendments

Aye 26 No 10

Passed 26 to 10. Support came from Labor, One Nation, Liberal Party, Liberal, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Greens.

30 June 2026

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 17 / 0
Greens 0 / 10
One Nation 4 / 0
Independent 1 / 0
Liberal Party 1 / 0
Liberal 1 / 0
Nationals 1 / 0
UAP 1 / 0

Amendments at a glance

Recorded amendment and procedural votes grouped by chamber. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.

House

Defeated

Ban financing for coal, gas and native-forest logging

Aye 7 No 71

Defeated 7 to 71. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Katter's Australian Party, and Nationals.

11 Mar 2026

The proposed change was not agreed.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 69
Independent 6 / 0
Greens 1 / 0
Katter's Australian Party 0 / 1
Nationals 0 / 1

Did not vote: Liberal Party, LNP, Nationals

Defeated

Add climate rules and First Nations consultation

Aye 7 No 68

Defeated 7 to 68. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Katter's Australian Party, One Nation, and Nationals.

11 Mar 2026

The bill proceeded without these restrictions and consultation requirements for facility funding decisions.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 65
Independent 6 / 0
Greens 1 / 0
Katter's Australian Party 0 / 1
One Nation 0 / 1
Nationals 0 / 1

Did not vote: Liberal Party, LNP, Nationals

Senate

Defeated

Prioritise mining and exclude net-zero measures

Aye 20 No 31

Defeated 20 to 31. Support came from Liberal, One Nation, Liberal Party, and Nationals. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents.

30 June 2026

The defeat meant the Senate did not attach this policy position to its agreement to consider the bill.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 20
Liberal 13 / 0
Greens 0 / 10
One Nation 4 / 0
Independent 0 / 1
Liberal Party 1 / 0
Nationals 1 / 0
UAP 1 / 0
Defeated

Make the facility operate permanently

Aye 20 No 30

Defeated 20 to 30. Support came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and Liberal Party. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents.

30 June 2026

The bill retained its extension to 2036 and its existing schedule of statutory reviews instead of making the facility permanent.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 19
Liberal 12 / 0
Greens 0 / 10
One Nation 4 / 0
Nationals 2 / 0
Independent 0 / 1
Liberal Party 1 / 0
UAP 1 / 0
Defeated

Ban financing for coal, gas and native-forest logging

Aye 11 No 26

Defeated 11 to 26. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, One Nation, Liberal Party, and Liberal.

30 June 2026

The facility remained able to consider those activities under the bill and its investment framework.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 18
Greens 10 / 0
One Nation 0 / 4
Independent 1 / 0
Liberal Party 0 / 1
Liberal 0 / 1
Nationals 0 / 1
UAP 0 / 1

This list includes amendment votes, procedural votes and votes on the bill itself.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Madeleine King

Australian Labor Party • MP 04 Mar 2026

King supports the bill because it extends the facility's investment period to 2036, strengthens oversight and gives investors greater certainty so development projects across northern Australia can continue.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead opposing voice Opposes

Elizabeth Watson-Brown

Australian Greens • MP 11 Mar 2026

Watson-Brown says the Greens will oppose the bill unless it is amended to prevent the Northern Australia Infrastructure FacilityA government lender for northern infrastructure projects. from financing coal, gas and native logging projects, arguing taxpayers should not bear the risks of environmentally damaging developments.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Paul Scarr

Liberal Party • Senator 30 June 2026

Paul Scarr supports the bill and Senator McDonald's amendment to make the Northern Australia Infrastructure FacilityA government lender for northern infrastructure projects. permanent, arguing that it successfully unlocks investment, jobs and wider economic benefits across northern Australia.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Mixed

Zali Steggall

Independent • MP 11 Mar 2026

Steggall supports extending the infrastructure facility only with amendments that prohibit fossil fuel financing, align funding with climate law and require consultation with First Nations communities.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

7 speakers · 8 contributions · 7 support

  1. Julie-Ann Campbell Campbell supports the bill because extending the facility to 2036 will sustain investment in northern Australian infrastructure, jobs and economic development, while regular reviews and stronger accountability will help keep it effective and transparent.
    “The NAIF has already delivered more than $4 billion worth of investments across northern Queensland, the NT and northern Western Australia. The few I've mentioned here today illustrate how the NAIF has the capacity to affect positive and lasting change across many sectors, in many communities and in many families. The Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment Bill 2026 means that the NAIF will remain a secure, consistent and transparent source of funding to bolster economic development, jobs and infrastructure for our whole nation.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Luke Gosling Gosling supports extending the Northern Australia Infrastructure FacilityA government lender for northern infrastructure projects. for another 10 years, arguing it will unlock investment and jobs, expand First Nations participation, strengthen critical supply chains and build resilient northern communities.
    “Northern Australia is half of our continent by landmass and home to some of our most dynamic industries, our fastest growing communities and the First Nations peoples whose stewardship of country spans millennia. Of course, a strong north means a strong Australia, and today I'm proud to speak in support of the Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment Bill 2026, which will extend the NAIF, the Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility, for a further 10 years. This is a practical, nation-building step that will unlock investment, create jobs, deepen First Nations participation and help secure critical supply chains as we transition to net zero, all while returning significant public benefit well beyond the Commonwealth's outlay—as significant as the Commonwealth's outlay is.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Rowan Holzberger Holzberger supports the bill because extending the facility to 2036 and strengthening its accountability will promote infrastructure, jobs and economic diversification in northern Australia while supporting First Nations participation and the transition to net zero.
    “Finally, I'd just say that there are many examples here, whether it's critical minerals, whether it's the future made in Australia, whether it's agriculture—this NAIF forms an essential part of the government's broader economic strategy and meets those broader economic goals. The idea that it continues to 2036 and the idea that its accountability measures are strengthened—I think it's going to give it the longevity that it so desperately needs and create the opportunities which are so abundantly clear. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Jess Walsh Walsh supports the bill because it will extend the facility's investment mandateGovernment-set rules guiding the facility’s investments. for another decade while strengthening oversight, preserving investor certainty and supporting jobs and development across northern Australia.
    “This Bill strengthens NAIF's legislative foundation, improves accountability, maintains certainty for investors and ensures the framework remains fit for purpose through the next decade.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 12 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Matt Smith Smith supports the bill because extending the facility and expanding its financing will unlock infrastructure, housing and economic development across northern Australia.
    “I hope through my speech I have shown just how important both the NAIF and government investment are to northern Australia and what northern Australia means to the rest of the country. We are not the final frontier. We are the future. The NAIF allows us to be the best version of ourselves and will help bring Australia along with us. I commend this bill to the House and all urge all members to back in northern Australia.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Nita Green Green supports the bill, saying it will extend infrastructure investment decisions to 2036 while strengthening accountability and giving investors and northern communities long-term certainty.
    “This bill strengthens the legislative foundations of the Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility, enhances accountability, provides certainty to investors and project proponents, ensures that NAIF remains a reliable partner in delivering the long-term infrastructure necessary to grow northern Australia. It's a practical, measured and future focused package of reforms. I've seen with my own eyes the real transformational effects and economic benefits that the NAIF has had in northern Australia—and will continue to have over the next 10 years if this bill is passed. I think, genuinely, if you are a supporter of the people of northern Australia and the NAIF, then you will support this bill. I thank the Senate, and I commend the bill to the Senate.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 30 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

4 speakers · 4 support

  1. Melissa Price Price says the coalition supports the bill's 10-year extension of northern infrastructure investment because it provides certainty for major projects, jobs and regional development, but would prefer the facility to be made permanent.
    “We are supporting this bill. Of course, we support the NAIF. The coalition created the NAIF, and we recognise the importance of continuing this investment. For the communities across Durack and the north, NAIF represents an ongoing commitment to the infrastructure that supports jobs, drives investment and strengthens regional Australia. A thriving north equals a prosperous Australia. It always has; it always will. For that, we need the Northern Australia Infrastructure Fund, which is why the coalition created the fund and why we support this bill today.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 11 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Dean Smith Dean Smith says the coalition supports the bill's 10-year extension of the infrastructure facility because it will provide certainty and help finance essential projects and economic growth across northern Australia, particularly the Kimberley and Pilbara.
    “Northern Australia is not a distant frontier; it is central to Australia's prosperity, security and future growth. That is why the coalition supports the Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment Bill 2026, extending the NAIF for a further 10 years from 30 June 2026 to 30 June 2036.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 30 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. David Littleproud David Littleproud says the coalition will support the bill because extending the facility for another 10 years will sustain infrastructure investment, jobs and economic and social development across northern Australia.
    “Northern Australia has always been an exciting and challenging frontier, with incredible and immense opportunities. On this front, the NAIF is perfectly poised to encourage and support investors in converting risk and opportunity into jobs, fostering sustainable communities, delivering transformational infrastructure and helping to secure a strong and more robust overall economy for both the North and the whole of Australia. We should all continue to support the vital work of the NAIF. That's why the federal coalition will be supporting this legislation. I thank the House.”

    National Party • MP • 10 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Greens

1 speaker · 1 oppose

Minor parties and independents

1 speaker · 1 mixed

Full record

Full chat