Extra bureaucracy and cost
Opponents argued the bill would add another higher education regulator instead of fixing teaching, research, student outcomes or university governance, with Dan Tehan criticising the reported $54 million cost.
This bill became law on Apr 1st, 2026.
Education & skills
Australia gets a new Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. to guide higher education by making provider agreements and giving advice to governments.
The Universities AccordA major review of Australian higher education whose 2024 final report recommended creating a national body to steer the system over the long term. Final Report 2024 exposed a critical gap: no dedicated steward to plan tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training., deliver national priorities, and improve equity and quality. The bill creates the Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. to guide the system through provider compacts, advice to governments, standards work, equity duties, consultation, reporting, and independent reviews.
Australia already had higher education regulators and funding arrangements, but the Universities AccordA major review of Australian higher education whose 2024 final report recommended creating a national body to steer the system over the long term. argued in February 2024 that the system needed a dedicated steward to plan growth, lift participation and connect tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training. with national skills needs. After vice-chancellors criticised a weaker departmental model for the proposed commission, the bill created the Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. as the body to guide provider agreements and advise governments, and it became law after passage in March 2026 and assent in April 2026.
The strongest criticism was that the bill would create a costly new Canberra bureaucracy that duplicates existing education bodies while leaving the commission too dependent on the minister and department to be genuinely independent. Coalition speakers opposed the bill on that basis, while several crossbench supporters of the reform pushed narrower amendments on independence, remit, student debt and resourcing.
Jason Clare MP introduced this bill. It passed with support from Labor, Greens, some crossbench members; opposed by Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, UAP.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 01 Apr 2026
Final passage
Recorded final vote
1 counted final-passage vote was recorded.
Passage speed
126 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Australia gets a new Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. to guide higher education by making provider agreements and giving advice to governments.
Universities and other listed higher education providers can enter mission-based agreements with the Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy., with yearly checks against agreed goals.
The Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. must consider better education outcomes for First Nations people, people with disability, low-income students and regional Australians.
Related changes move higher education standards advice to the Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. and allow information sharing with the Department of Education.
Independent reviews must check the Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. and its law after 2 years and again after 5 years.
The purpose of the ATEC is to provide stewardship of the higher education system. The ATEC provides this stewardship primarily by:Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Act 2026 final Act text
The ATEC may enter into a mission based compact with a Table A or Table B provider. The ATEC must assess a provider against the terms of their compact at least once every calendar year.Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Act 2026 final Act text
In performing functions or exercising powers, the ATEC and the ATEC Commissioners must have regard to the objective of improving outcomes for persons facing systemic barriers to education, including Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders, persons with disability, persons of a low socioeconomic background and persons living in regional Australia.Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Act 2026 final Act text
The Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025 (the C&T Bill) will support the implementation of the Bill by making necessary amendments to related legislation and establishing transitional arrangements. The C&T Bill amends HESA and the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 to facilitate the arrangements under the Bill, including enabling information sharing between the Department of Education and the ATEC, and transferring responsibilities in respect of the Higher Education Standards Framework (including the development of the Threshold Standards) from the Higher Education Standards Panel to the ATEC.Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) explanatory memorandum
The Bill provides for two independent review points, 2 and 5 years after its commencement. The reviews will provide the opportunity to assess the operation of the enabling legislation and the role and functions of the ATEC.Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) explanatory memorandum
Context
Australia already had higher education regulators and funding arrangements, but the Universities AccordA major review of Australian higher education whose 2024 final report recommended creating a national body to steer the system over the long term. argued in February 2024 that the system needed a dedicated steward to plan growth, lift participation and connect tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training. with national skills needs. After vice-chancellors criticised a weaker departmental model for the proposed commission, the bill created the Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. as the body to guide provider agreements and advise governments, and it became law after passage in March 2026 and assent in April 2026.
Universities AccordA major review of Australian higher education whose 2024 final report recommended creating a national body to steer the system over the long term. calls for a stronger tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training. steward
The AccordA major review of Australian higher education whose 2024 final report recommended creating a national body to steer the system over the long term. set out 47 recommendations aimed at expanding higher education over 25 years, improving access for disadvantaged students and better matching graduates with the skills the economy needs.
Australian Financial Review ↗Vice-chancellors criticise a weaker commission model
University leaders said the proposed Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. was being designed too much like a branch of the Education Department rather than the more independent body they expected from the AccordA major review of Australian higher education whose 2024 final report recommended creating a national body to steer the system over the long term..
Australian Financial Review ↗Government introduces the Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. bill
The Minister presented the bill as a key AccordA major review of Australian higher education whose 2024 final report recommended creating a national body to steer the system over the long term. recommendation to establish ATECThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. and support long-term reform of higher education.
Hansard ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing the parliamentary step needed to create the new commission in law.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. Act receives Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act.
Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. turned the bill into an Act, allowing the new tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training. stewardship arrangements to proceed.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Referred to Committee (27/11/2025): Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (27/02/2026)
Referred to committee
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber. Later message exchanges with the other chamber were still recorded afterwards.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Recorded vote: 37 to 26.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Committee of the WholeA Senate stage where senators examine and vote on detailed amendments to a bill. debate
Recorded vote: 36 to 27.
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Consideration of Senate message
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
The strongest criticism was that the bill would create a costly new Canberra bureaucracy that duplicates existing education bodies while leaving the commission too dependent on the minister and department to be genuinely independent. Coalition speakers opposed the bill on that basis, while several crossbench supporters of the reform pushed narrower amendments on independence, remit, student debt and resourcing.
Criticism was substantial but split between outright opposition and conditional support for a stronger commission.
Extra bureaucracy and cost
Opponents argued the bill would add another higher education regulator instead of fixing teaching, research, student outcomes or university governance, with Dan Tehan criticising the reported $54 million cost.
Independence from government
Critics warned the commission could become too close to the minister and Department of Education, limiting its ability to give frank long-term advice and act as the independent body the Universities AccordA major review of Australian higher education whose 2024 final report recommended creating a national body to steer the system over the long term. had envisaged.
Wrong priorities for tertiary education
Coalition criticism said the bill’s national objective put the wrong emphasis on ideological goals and should instead stress research excellence, productivity, competition, efficiency, Australian values and lower regulatory burdens.
Student debt and affordability left unresolved
Some critics supported the commission but said the bill did not do enough to tackle HECSAustralia's student loan system for university fees, raised in debate because critics said the bill did not do enough about student debt. debt, the Job-ready GraduatesA 2021 university funding and fee model that changed student contribution amounts by field of study and was criticised on this page for creating unfair debt burdens. student contribution settings or the affordability barriers faced by disadvantaged students.
Further sources
Votes
The chamber-passage votes come first. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Passed 36 to 27. Support came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, and UAP.
Earlier bill-stage votes
Passed 37 to 26. Support came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, One Nation, Nationals, and UAP.
Passed 29 to 15. Support came from Labor, Liberal Party, and Nationals. Opposition came from Greens, One Nation, and minor parties and independents.
Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.
House
The House agreed to the amendments made by the Senate, so the bill could pass both chambers in the same form.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Senate
Defeated 28 to 35. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, and UAP. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
This would have rewritten the bill's core statement of what Australia's tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training. system should deliver, shifting it toward research performance, economic productivity and deregulation.
Moved by McKim. Passed 36 to 27. Support came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, and UAP.
These carried amendments materially strengthened the new commission's independence and broadened its statutory focus beyond administration to research, standards and the public role of higher education.
Moved by McKim. Defeated 12 to 33. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, One Nation, and Nationals.
Had it passed, this package would have pushed the commission further toward equity, broader inclusion definitions, more scrutiny of student contribution settings and greater independence in publishing its advice.
Moved by McKim. Defeated 6 to 39. Support came from One Nation and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Liberal Party, and Nationals.
This would have made employment outcomes a mandatory part of the commission's reporting, adding a stronger labour-market performance focus to the bill's reporting framework.
This motion called for the government to cancel student debt and make public university and technical education free and universal.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
This motion urged the new commission to prioritise urgent reforms to the student contribution system to address inequitable debt burdens in disciplines like arts and humanities.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
This proposal sought to strengthen the commission's research autonomy, require merit-based appointments, and ensure funding agreements respect the mission and goals of individual universities.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
These changes replace the single-commissioner model with a structure allowing for up to three commissioners to lead the organisation.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
This proposal aimed to formalise the protection of First Nations data sovereigntyThe idea that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples should have control over data about them, including how it is collected, used and shared. and include this responsibility in the mandate of the First Nations Advisory Committee.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
This list includes amendment votes, procedural votes and votes on the bill itself.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Jason Clare supports the bill and wants it passed because it creates the Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy., which he says is a key reform from the Universities AccordA major review of Australian higher education whose 2024 final report recommended creating a national body to steer the system over the long term..
Read in Hansard ↗Julian Leeser says the Liberal Party will oppose the bill in its current form, arguing it creates another unnecessary regulator, embeds the wrong ideological objectives for tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training., and is not fit to pass without proper scrutiny.
Read in Hansard ↗Monique Ryan supports the bill because creating the new tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training. commission and setting a national objective are worthwhile reforms, but she argues the legislation is too weak on student debt and the commission's independence.
Read in Hansard ↗Kate Chaney says she supports creating an independent tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training. commission in principle, but she cannot back the bill as drafted because it would leave the body too dependent on the minister and department to do the long-term, evidence-based job the accordA major review of Australian higher education whose 2024 final report recommended creating a national body to steer the system over the long term. proposed.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
21 speakers · 24 contributions · 21 support
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Jason Clare on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Jason Clare supports the bill and wants it passed because it creates the Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy., which he says is a key reform from the Universities AccordA major review of Australian higher education whose 2024 final report recommended creating a national body to steer the system over the long term.. He argues the reform is needed to reshape higher education for future skills needs and to improve access for people who are currently being left behind.
“This is a bill to establish the Australian Tertiary Education Commission, the ATEC.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Jason Clare strongly supports the bill, saying it will create the new tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training. commission needed to drive the Universities AccordA major review of Australian higher education whose 2024 final report recommended creating a national body to steer the system over the long term. reforms, provide independent advice and negotiations, and better connect universities with vocational education. He says the government is not backing proposed amendments for now but will consider them later.
“I thank all members for their contributions to this debate. The Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Bill 2025 is a bill to establish the Australian Tertiary Education Commission, the ATEC. Establishing the ATEC is a key recommendation of the Australian Universities Accord, and it will be the job of the ATEC to help drive and steer the big reforms in the accord, like demand-driven equity places and needs based funding. It'll also independently negotiate compacts with individual universities. It'll get the sector to work more like a system and build connections between the vocational education and training and the higher education systems. It'll provide independent, expert advice, and it will help to drive real and lasting reform. That's what the ATEC is about.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“Similarly, with the international student allocations, which a number of speakers have touched on, the ATEC should have a role in allocating international students as part of mission compacts. I make the point really clearly that each institution can have its own mission, its own mandate, to serve its community—whether that's a region or a part of a metropolitan area—and focus on its areas of excellence and research, the right blend of teaching, its international profile, offshore international partnerships. But what kind of cake are they trying to bake? What kind of entity are they trying to create? That's the mission compact. What's the vision? International students have to be part of that. Some universities want a very small percentage of international students; that's the kind of experience they want to create. Others are big, particularly in their postgrad—a lot of the Go8 are big globalised institutions—where they want a truly international experience in some of those courses. That's OK, but each university has to go through the discipline of articulating their vision, their mission, what they're trying to create and get that agreed through the mission compact. There's more work to come, but I really commend this bill to the House. We'll have a look at what the Senate inquiry puts forward and listen to sensible suggestions, but this is a really big structural reform.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The government has implemented 31 of the accord's 47 recommendations. The accord is a blueprint for sector reform for the decades ahead. It will take a long-term vision and a long-term commitment to deliver. To ensure its success, it needs a steward to drive and to steer these reforms, and the ATEC will formally take on this role for the tertiary education sector. As the Minister for Education has said, of all the recommendations in the accord, the establishment of the ATEC may be the most important. The establishment of the ATEC provides a singular opportunity for Australia's future. It provides an opportunity for an independent, expert body to drive real and lasting reform in the higher education sector. It provides an opportunity to uplift the coordination and administration of the sector. It's an opportunity to coordinate and align efforts across higher education institutions—as the Minister for Education says, 'to get the sector to work more like a system'. The ATEC will have its own decision-making powers, and it will take on responsibility for new mission based compacts with individual universities. The ATEC will provide expert advice to government on policy settings and strategic direction, the cost of teaching and learning in higher education, student demand, and meeting Australia's current and future skills and knowledge demand.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills establish ATEC as an independent statutory authority. To help deliver the future tertiary system Australia needs one that is equitable, joined up, responsive to skills needs and focused on student support. It will help us reach the 80 per cent attainment target by encouraging diversity, providing expert evidence based advice to governments, monitoring skills and equity targets and, as I said, helping to deliver a joined-up tertiary system that brings higher education and vocational education together.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise today to speak in support of the Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Bill 2025. This bill is about the future of universities and higher education in Australia. At the heart of it is the creation of the Australian Tertiary Education Commission or ATEC. The purpose of this bill is to set up the Australian Tertiary Education Commission. Think of it as a coach or a navigator for our universities and TAFE. It doesn't run the universities, but it makes sure they're doing what they should—giving students a great education and offering courses that actually matter. ATEC is going to be the blueprint for improving our higher education system. It will make sure universities deliver high-quality teaching. It will support world-class research, and it will help students get the skills Australia needs—the skills to contribute to our economy, support their local communities and play their part in shaping a stronger, fairer and better Australia.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“At its core, the establishment of the Australian Tertiary Education Commission is about acting now to set our tertiary education up to deliver what Australia needs in the future. It's a future focused step—like Labor's funding for more university places—and it is an example of our prioritisation of higher education.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This legislation rejects that short-termism. It chooses planning over drift, equity over exclusion and national interest over political convenience. It's an opportunity to build foundations for the next decade and the one after that, to open the doors of opportunity wider than they are today and to ensure that people in my community are not locked out of their potential. That is what this legislation does, and I'm proud to support it. I commend the bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These are not abstract changes. They make study more accessible. They make campuses safer. They make the cost of learning fairer. Tangible ambition in education cannot slide backwards. It needs a steward. If we are serious about the accord, we need an institution that can think long term. It must bring coherence across the VET and higher education sectors. It must monitor progress. It must keep reform moving. This bill establishes that steward, the Australian Tertiary Education Commission, or ATEC. Creating a system steward was a key accord recommendation. It is essential to building the tertiary system that our future needs. What will ATEC do? It will start by encouraging provider diversity, different missions, shared purpose and better choices for students. It will also provide expert advice to government on higher education settings, stable rules, clear signals and evidence based change. It will monitor skills and equity targets, track what matters and fix what isn't working. It will help keep the system honest. It will also join up the system so students can get the qualifications they need when they need them.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Since the federal election last year, I have had the pleasure of serving as a member of the House Standing Committee on Education, and I am so pleased to rise in support of the Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Bill 2025 and the Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Emma Comer on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Emma Comer strongly supports the bill, saying it will create an independent tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training. commission to give long-term stewardship to higher education, improve coordination and put equity at the centre of the system. She argues the reform is needed so universities can better meet future skills demand and help more students from underrepresented backgrounds access and succeed in higher education.
“Together, these bills respond directly to the challenges identified by the universities accord. They provide the governance, the coordination and the stewardship that the system has lacked; they support diversity and excellence across institutions; they place equity at the centre of system design; and they help ensure our tertiary education system is fit for the future. This is about building a system that serves students, supports educators, strengthens our workforce and underpins Australia's long-term prosperity.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Emma Comer supports the bill and says it is an important next step in reforming tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training., building on earlier progress and helping make higher education more accessible and fairer. She argues strong long-term reform is needed because universities are vital to opportunity, skills, research and Australia's future economy.
“Accessible education is paramount to the Australian way of life. It provides opportunity and levels the playing field for those who are not born into privilege. As someone who has previously served on their university council, I've seen firsthand some of the challenges faced by this sector and, as such, I am proud to speak in favour of the Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Bill 2025. It presents the next stage of tertiary education reform, building on the significant progress already made across the university sector.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Claire Clutterham on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Claire Clutterham supports the bill, saying it will create the Australian Tertiary Education CommissionThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. to give stronger leadership and coordination to higher education reform so Australia can build the skills, research and workforce it needs. She argues the commission will help make the tertiary system more responsive, collaborative and fairer for students facing barriers to education.
“I rise today to speak in support of the Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Bill 2025. In establishing the Australian Tertiary Education Commission as a steward of the higher education system, the bill implements a key recommendation from the Australian Universities Accord final report of 2024. The review that resulted in that final report was asked to examine Australia's higher education system and create a long-term plan for reform. The overarching theme can be simply stated. If Australia is to prosper in the years ahead, Australian participation, performance and investment in tertiary education needs to improve in order to generate the knowledge, skills and research our nation needs to meet our current and emerging social, economic and environmental challenges. It noted that there were chronic shortages of skilled professionals, including early childhood educators, teachers, aged-care workers, nurses and doctors. Increasingly, Australia is going to need greater numbers of engineers and others to transform our energy grid, advance our manufacturing sector, drive new discoveries and innovations, make our agriculture more sustainable and build new public infrastructure for our growing cities and regions.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Claire Clutterham supports the bill, arguing that the new tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training. commission will provide trusted independent advice and help build a stronger higher education system for Australia's long-term economic and social prosperity.
“We are at a generational juncture, and this is the moment to design an enduring higher education system that serves Australia's interests for decades to come. In building on the strengths of the current tertiary education framework, the ATEC is part of a system that will underpin Australia's economic and social prosperity. The ATEC must cement public confidence in the higher education system and become a longstanding and trusted source of tertiary policy expertise and stewardship and be a strong, independent body operating under the strategic direction of government, facilitating the mission of universities to be places of high-quality teaching and research and development that drives innovation, productivity and economic prosperity. I stand with the Prime Minister and Minister for Education as they prosecute this agenda, and I commend the bill to the House.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“In my first speech in this place, I shared how I am forever grateful for the education, the keys to the kingdom, that I received and acknowledged that education changes lives. It changed mine, and it does so for many Australians in our communities. The words I shared in 2022—that I'm passionate about ensuring we have a robust higher education system that values intellectual curiosity and supports people to think, to experiment and to create new ideas, systems and solutions—are beliefs that I still hold, and I'm very pleased to support the Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Bill 2025. The Labor Party is the party of education, and the Albanese Labor government has invested in education ever since it was first elected. Whether that be through cutting student debt by 20 per cent while making the indexation system fairer, establishing a Commonwealth-paid prac system so students can get paid on placements, establishing a student ombudsman or making free TAFE permanent, we are absolutely committed to making sure that every Australian has the opportunity to pursue a great education in this country.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill continues a long and proud tradition of reform, which began with the Curtin government and was strengthened under the Menzies government. Both sides of politics recognised then, as we do now, that education is nation-building. This legislation builds new foundations for the decades ahead. It expands opportunity, it strengthens skills, and it ensures the system—importantly—remains fair, accessible and sustainable. For these reasons, I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“For my community in Holt, these reforms matter deeply. They matter for the young person who wants to be the first in their family to graduate, they matter for the parent retraining to secure a better future, they matter for the aspiring teacher, nurse or social worker who wants to serve their community with dignity, and they matter for Australia because a strong, fair and future-ready tertiary education system is one of the most important investments we can make for our people and for our prosperity. I'm proud to be a part of a government that takes education seriously. My parents taught me that education is a gift, but, in a country like Australia, it shouldn't just be a gift for a lucky few; it should be a right for everyone regardless of where they live or how much their parents earn. This bill sets us on that path. It builds on the architecture we need for the future. It delivers on the promise of the Universities Accord. I want to thank the Minister for Education, Jason Clare, for his leadership on this. He has listened to the sector, he has listened to the students and he has acted. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Australian Tertiary Education Commission is a key piece of the puzzle in this regard. This was, of course, a recommendation from the Australian Universities Accord, a blueprint that tells us about the kind of work that we need to get on with doing to set up the system for the next 20 years and those structural reforms that we need to pursue: building stronger links between vocational education and universities, allocating funding under the new Managed Growth Funding System, implementing needs based funding within the core funding model and negotiating mission based compacts to support the sector. Fundamentally, what the accord tells us is that, in the coming years, there will be more jobs requiring more skills and requiring vocational qualifications, higher education qualifications or both. Australia needs to grow the number of Australians with a tertiary qualification to four in five. To achieve this, we need to set the system up to meet the modern needs of Australians.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I commend these bills to the House. It is a very good policy area that ensures we plan for the future and we plan together in partnership with our universities, TAFEs and vet courses, to ensure we produce the workforce that's required to keep this country's economy going for many years into the future.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“For Australia, there's no turning back. We must embrace the challenges identified in the final report of the Australian Universities Accord. Not only that; we need to ensure that the overall governance of our tertiary education system makes us a match for decades to come. The establishment of ATEC will mean that our best and sharpest minds will be devoted to this incredibly important sector. I commend the bills to the House and thank the minister for his leadership in implementing these reforms in the university sector.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“There is also a practical side to the bills which makes a lot of sense. Universities will have to be clearer about what they're there to do and what their goals are, and how that lines up with national and local needs—and I don't think that's some outrageous ask. If institutions are receiving public support, it's fair to expect them to be thinking about students, communities, workforce needs and outcomes, not just operating in their own bubble. Some people are worried this could become another layer of bureaucracy. Some are worried it won't be independent enough. Some think the bills don't go far enough. While these are valid things to discuss, for me the big picture is this: the current system is not perfect and pretending it's fine is not a serious option.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We know the sector strongly supports the establishment of an ATEC. For that reason, our report recommended that the Senate pass these bills. Over the course of this inquiry we heard evidence that the ATEC has the potential to become one of the most consequential transformations of the Australian higher education sector since the reforms of the eighties. Any further delay in creating a steward would leave the sector without the guidance it so urgently requires.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I acknowledge Senator Pocock has put forward amendments including on the number of commissioners, and I thank him for his contribution to strengthening the ATEC. The Australian government also appreciates the support of many stakeholders for the establishment of the ATEC. These bills let us to deliver the ATEC in legislation. This is real, lasting reform, and it's disappointing but not surprising that the coalition have opposed the reform. The ATEC will make our university system stronger. I commend the bills to the Senate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So today I urge the Senate to support this bill. This is not a debate about politics. This is about nation building. Supporting this bill means backing students, giving them clearer pathways to qualifications without unnecessary barriers. It means backing universities, offering policy certainty that allows them to plan, invest and innovate. It means backing regional Australia, ensuring country campuses and regional students are not left behind. It means backing equity and fairness, direct support to those who need it the most. If you want a system that offers opportunity to every Australian regardless of their background, support this bill. Australia needs a strong, competitive tertiary sector. Partner with us in delivering it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
7 speakers · 7 oppose
“So, in summing up, let me say this. If forced to vote on this legislation before the committee completes its inquiry, the Liberal Party will oppose this legislation. That is the holding position. We will join the very large chorus of stakeholders and interested parties saying these bills are not fit to pass, and we will continue working on those bigger questions in the interests of all Australians. In closing, I thank the House and move the amendment as circulated in my name:”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So when a bill of this nature, with a $54 million vague mandate and a deliberate disregard for regional Australia, is put before us as the people's representatives—at a time when so many of my constituents are having to make tough decisions about how to manage their budgets, put food on their table and pay for essentials—I cannot possibly support this bill. Reform of the university sector is needed, but not in this way.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So forget about your Australian Tertiary Education Commission. It is not needed. Spend that $54 million on something which will change lives in communities because that's what this nation needs at the moment. The money that is being wasted by this government—which is driving up inflation, driving up interest rates and leaving communities desperate for services—has to stop. It's about time you got your priorities right.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I, too, rise to speak on the Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Bill 2025 and the Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025. I acknowledge the support for the principle of ATEC in the university sector, but, given the flaws, omissions and governance issues in this legislation, I have reservations about a further bureaucracy in the tertiary sector and the way that that bureaucracy would be structured and operate. The Nationals and the coalition believe in less regulation and less red tape, not more of it. The combination of additional regulation and duplication, or regulatory overlap, is even less desirable.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Bill 2025 and the associated bill are no different. The Australian Tertiary Education Commission is a bureaucratic solution about how more people are employed to sit over the top of policy when one of the biggest problems with universities right now is that they are completely top heavy. If we add bureaucracies on top of university administrations, where we have vice-chancellors earning in excess of the Prime Minister and everyone in this chamber, we won't be getting the focus and the resources to where we need them—learning, teaching and research. In fact, this bill does so little to advance learning, teaching and research it doesn't even mention them in the legislation. I'd say that's disappointing but, truthfully, it's an embarrassment.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to speak on the Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Bill 2025 and the Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025. These are the bills which establish the Australian Tertiary Education Commission, known as ATEC. That's how I'll refer to it. Let me say this from the very outset. These bills are not in a state fit to pass this parliament. They are replete with problems at every level, from design flaws to major technical operational errors. The bills have been criticised right across the board. To put it bluntly, these bills are not what Australians need right now. This bill has very few friends. Maybe it will have some friends here in this place tonight and pass this parliament, but out there, in the real world, among providers and universities in the higher ed sector, it does not have the kind of support that would justify this bill probably being rushed through tonight. I've only got 3½ more minutes to speak because this bill is subject to the guillotine that we're dealing with tonight.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I have other comments and concerns with respect to this bill, but I will say this. It's a great disappointment that, in relation to something where we should be able to get cross-chamber support, for a piece of legislation that's this important—it's a great concern that the government is pressing forward with a piece of legislation that does not achieve its stated objectives.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 1 support · 1 mixed
“An Australian Tertiary Education Commission, or ATEC, as envisaged by the accord, has the potential to provide stability and stewardship to the higher education sector. However, the proposal in this bill requires significant changes. The Greens have secured a number of amendments to the bill that will improved ATEC's ability to confront the significant challenges facing the higher education system.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It appears that it will be years before we see the end of $50,000 arts degrees. Indeed, with an ATEC beholden to the minister, we may never see it at all. How does that advantage university students and the whole sector? The Albanese Labor government could repeal the Job-ready Graduates fee hikes and funding cuts today. They could do that today. They could live up to the promise of the universities accord by establishing a truly independent ATEC that is able to fulfil the role of stewarding a struggling but absolutely crucial sector. Given the flaws with this bill and the inexcusable delay to reforming Job-ready Graduates, the Greens will be abstaining in the House, and we'll be reserving our position in the Senate. It is abundantly clear that this bill needs comprehensive amendments to make it fit for purpose.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
5 speakers · 6 contributions · 3 support · 1 mixed · 1 unclear
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Kate Chaney on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Kate Chaney says she supports creating an independent tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training. commission in principle, but she cannot back the bill as drafted because it would leave the body too dependent on the minister and department to do the long-term, evidence-based job the accordA major review of Australian higher education whose 2024 final report recommended creating a national body to steer the system over the long term. proposed. She is seeking amendments on independence, staffing, commissioner numbers, research and student costs, and says without those essential changes she is unlikely to support the bill.
“I'm not alone. My position has been shaped by consultation with higher education experts and university groups, and by close reading of the submissions made to the Senate committee inquiry. There's a consistent message across many of them: yes to an ATEC in concept, but no to an ATEC that cannot act independently, cannot publish freely and cannot build its own capability. In other words, if ATEC is not meaningfully different from the department then why bother? I'll be moving amendments to attempt to fix these defects, and if the government will not accept these essential changes then I'm unlikely to support this bill in its current form.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Kate Chaney opposes the bill as drafted because she says the proposed ATECThe new national body created by the Act to guide higher education, negotiate provider agreements and advise governments on tertiary education policy. would not be independent, properly constituted or capable enough to do the job. She supports the idea of an expert tertiary educationEducation after school, including universities, other higher education providers and vocational education and training. commission in principle, but says she will seek amendments to make it independent and fit for purpose.
“That's why I oppose this bill as drafted. I will move amendments to make ATEC independent, capable and fit for purpose, and if the government is serious about delivering the accord's vision then it should accept them.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“If we are serious about securing the future of Australian tertiary education, then we have to ensure that the systems that we build are coherent, transparent and generally capable of restoring public trust. Establishing an Australian Tertiary Education Commission is a step towards that goal. It offers the possibility of a sector guided by evidence rather than short-term policies by careful long-term planning, not piecemeal fixes. This bill will move us towards the implementation of the Universities Accord, but I urge the House and the minister to ensure that the commission is fully equipped to reform the higher education sector and to better tackle the cost-of-education crisis which faces Australian students.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“At the same time, the sector has waited a long time for clearer stewardship, and many accord reforms depend on having a body like this in place. I support the accord, and I support the principle of an ATEC. However, I support the amendments put forward by Kate Chaney, Monique Ryan and Julian Leeser. They strengthen this bill. They deal with many of the design flaws that I have highlighted in my speech. I think the government should look carefully at these amendments, and I think this is an example of where strengthening our democracy is strengthened by broadening participation in the contest of ideas. This bill could be strengthened. I believe this bill should be strengthened, because we do need a university system that opens doors, not closes them, and a system that fuels ambitions, not burden. We do need a system that ensures every Australian, regardless of background, can experience the transformative period of discovery, independence and learning that so many of us in the House remember so well. But we have a lot of work to do here, and we need this commission, if established, to be as strong and robust as possible. There is more work to be done on this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I recognise the intention behind Australian Tertiary Education Commission. Long-term planning is good, but, in Fowler, we have seen commissions and taskforces come and go. Without real accountability, there is a risk this commission becomes just another layer of expensive Canberra based bureaucracy, well-intentioned on paper but disconnected from students' lived realities.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“As has been pointed to in some of the contributions, our universities are critical national institutions. They educate the next generation, they drive innovation and they underpin our economic and social prosperity. So getting the settings right clearly matters. However, if ATEC is to fulfil its promise, it must be more than a new layer of administration. It must be genuinely independent, properly resourced and empowered to provide frank and fearless advice. That's why the second reading amendment I'll be moving makes three key points. First, it notes that the creation of ATEC is positive reform. Second, it recognises that ATEC's long-term effectiveness depends on its independence. This was raised a number of times through the committee process. That means independence in its functions, in its resourcing and in its reporting. Third, it urges ATEC to prioritise one of the most urgent and pressing issues in higher education today: fixing the failed job-ready graduates scheme.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Consideration in detail debate
Consideration in detail
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
House · Consideration in detail debate
Consideration in detail
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 37 to 26.
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Committee of the whole: amendments considered
Amendment packages agreed
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 36 to 27.
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
House · Consideration of Senate message
House agreed to Senate amendments
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.
Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (27/02/2026)
Referred to committee
Referred to Committee (27 Nov 2025): Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (27 Feb 2026)
APH bill page notes