Rushed Senate scrutiny
Opposition speakers said the environment bills were being pushed through before the Senate committee process had run its course, despite the package being large and technically complex.
This bill became law on Dec 1st, 2025.
Climate, energy & environment
The bill creates the statutory role of Head of Environment Information AustraliaThe statutory position created by the Act to lead national environmental data, information and reporting work. to lead national work on environmental data, reporting and information access.
The bill was introduced as part of the government’s wider environmental law reform package after the 2020 Samuel review found Australia’s environmental data was fragmented and had major gaps. The explanatory memorandum says better national environmental information was needed for evidence-informed policy, project, investment and regulatory decisions, and the bill responds by creating an independent statutory reporting and data role inside the environment department.
The Environment Information AustraliaThe environmental information function in the department that the Head of Environment Information Australia is intended to lead. bill sits alongside the government’s broader rewrite of national environment laws and the creation of the National Environmental Protection AgencyThe companion national environment regulator whose CEO is one of the people the Head of Environment Information Australia must support with environmental data.. Its narrower job is to fix the data and reporting side of that reform: the Samuel review identified fragmented environmental information, the 2023-24 Budget funded Environment Information AustraliaThe environmental information function in the department that the Head of Environment Information Australia is intended to lead., and Parliament passed this bill with the wider environment package in November 2025.
Direct criticism of the Environment Information AustraliaThe environmental information function in the department that the Head of Environment Information Australia is intended to lead. bill was limited because most debate treated it as one bill in a much larger environment reform package. Critics mainly argued the package was rushed, lacked enough scrutiny and would create uncertainty for industries affected by the broader environmental approval reforms.
Mr Tony Burke, for the government introduced this bill. It passed with support from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, some crossbench members; opposed by Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, some crossbench members.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 01 Dec 2025
Final passage
Recorded final vote
1 counted final-passage vote was recorded.
Passage speed
32 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
The bill creates the statutory role of Head of Environment Information AustraliaThe statutory position created by the Act to lead national environmental data, information and reporting work. to lead national work on environmental data, reporting and information access.
The Head of Environment Information AustraliaThe statutory position created by the Act to lead national environmental data, information and reporting work. would give environmental information and data to the minister, the National Environmental Protection AgencyThe companion national environment regulator whose CEO is one of the people the Head of Environment Information Australia must support with environmental data. CEO and the public.
The role would maintain a public register of nationally important environmental information assets, but the bill says this does not change who owns or controls those assets.
State of the Environment reports would be published every second year and would draw on scientific expertise and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledge and insights.
The bill creates information-use rules, including civil penalties for unauthorised use or disclosure of protected informationInformation covered by confidentiality rules because disclosure could cause harms such as breaching confidence, affecting investigations, endangering safety or harming environmental protection., while allowing information sharing for the Head of Environment Information AustraliaThe statutory position created by the Act to lead national environmental data, information and reporting work.’s functions.
The Environment Information Australia Bill 2025 (the EIA Bill) would establish the statutory position of the Head of Environment Information Australia (HEIA), to provide national leadership for improving the availability and accessibility of high quality, national, environmental data and information.Environment Information Australia explanatory memorandum
The statutory functions of the HEIA would include: providing the Minister, the Chief Executive Officer of National Environmental Protection Agency (CEO), and the public with access to high-quality environmental information and data.Environment Information Australia explanatory memorandum
The HEIA would have powers to make declarations about national environmental information assets and record these assets in a public online register... The EIA Bill would not change who owns, controls, or maintains that asset, or impose any obligations on an asset holder.Environment Information Australia explanatory memorandum
Subclause 12(1) would require the HEIA to prepare and publish a State of the Environment report by 15 December every second year... Subclause 12(3) would require the report to draw on and reflect the knowledge and insights of persons with scientific expertise... and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.Environment Information Australia explanatory memorandum
The EIA Bill would include a regime for the use and disclosure of information... The EIA Bill would include civil penalties where use or disclosure happens otherwise than as authorised.Environment Information Australia explanatory memorandum
Context
The Environment Information AustraliaThe environmental information function in the department that the Head of Environment Information Australia is intended to lead. bill sits alongside the government’s broader rewrite of national environment laws and the creation of the National Environmental Protection AgencyThe companion national environment regulator whose CEO is one of the people the Head of Environment Information Australia must support with environmental data.. Its narrower job is to fix the data and reporting side of that reform: the Samuel review identified fragmented environmental information, the 2023-24 Budget funded Environment Information AustraliaThe environmental information function in the department that the Head of Environment Information Australia is intended to lead., and Parliament passed this bill with the wider environment package in November 2025.
Samuel review identifies environmental data gaps
The explanatory memorandum says Professor Graeme Samuel’s independent review found Australia’s environmental data and information was fragmented and that fundamental information gaps impeded better environmental decisions.
Environment Information Australia explanatory memorandum ↗Budget funds Environment Information AustraliaThe environmental information function in the department that the Head of Environment Information Australia is intended to lead.
The explanatory memorandum records $51.5 million over four years from 2023-24, plus $4.5 million a year ongoing, to establish Environment Information AustraliaThe environmental information function in the department that the Head of Environment Information Australia is intended to lead. as an authoritative environmental information source.
Environment Information Australia explanatory memorandum ↗Government introduces the data and reporting bill
The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives as part of the government’s environment reform package, with the stated aim of creating the statutory Head of Environment Information AustraliaThe statutory position created by the Act to lead national environmental data, information and reporting work..
APH bill page and second reading speech ↗Senate committee inquiry receives the package
The APH notes record referral to the Environment and Communications Legislation Committee, with a report date listed for 2 April 2026, although the bill later passed before that date.
APH bill page notes ↗Senate passes the bill with the environment package
The Senate passed the remaining stages of the package after considering amendment outcomes recorded in the Senate Journal; the EIAThe environmental information function in the department that the Head of Environment Information Australia is intended to lead. bill text itself shows no substantive text change from introduction to passage.
Senate Journal and local bill-text comparison ↗Environment Information AustraliaThe environmental information function in the department that the Head of Environment Information Australia is intended to lead. Act receives Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act.
Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. turned the bill into an Act. Its commencement is tied to the commencement of the National Environmental Protection AgencyThe companion national environment regulator whose CEO is one of the people the Head of Environment Information Australia must support with environmental data. Act 2025.
APH progress table and as-passed text ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill was referred to Environment and Communications Legislation Committee; Committee report (02/04/2026).
Referred to committee
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Recorded vote: 91 to 32.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Recorded vote: 35 to 24.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Recorded vote: 32 to 20.
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
Direct criticism of the Environment Information AustraliaThe environmental information function in the department that the Head of Environment Information Australia is intended to lead. bill was limited because most debate treated it as one bill in a much larger environment reform package. Critics mainly argued the package was rushed, lacked enough scrutiny and would create uncertainty for industries affected by the broader environmental approval reforms.
Supporters described the EIAThe environmental information function in the department that the Head of Environment Information Australia is intended to lead. bill as the data and transparency part of the package, while criticism in the local record mostly targeted the wider Environment Protection Reform and NEPAThe companion national environment regulator whose CEO is one of the people the Head of Environment Information Australia must support with environmental data. measures debated with it.
Rushed Senate scrutiny
Opposition speakers said the environment bills were being pushed through before the Senate committee process had run its course, despite the package being large and technically complex.
Industry and project uncertainty
Coalition criticism said the wider package would make approval pathways harder for mining, gas, forestry, farming, housing and other projects, especially after the government reached agreement with the Greens.
Climate protections still incomplete
Greens speakers supported the final package but said it still did not create a full climate trigger or allow the environment minister to consider all climate damage from new coal and gas projects.
Further sources
Votes
The chamber-passage votes come first. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Passed 32 to 20. Support came from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and One Nation. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
Earlier bill-stage votes
Passed 91 to 32. Support came from Labor, Centre Alliance, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
Passed 35 to 24. Support came from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and One Nation. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.
Senate
Defeated 13 to 35. Support came from Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, One Nation, and Nationals.
The vote rejected a Greens statement on First Nations consent before the Senate moved on.
Moved by Jonathon Duniam (Liberal Party). Defeated 19 to 34. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents.
The vote rejected an Opposition attempt to narrow when serious environmental impacts would block action.
Defeated 4 to 44. Support came from Australia's Voice and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Liberal Party, and One Nation.
The vote rejected most of a crossbench criticism of the package.
Defeated 27 to 33. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens.
The vote rejected delaying passage for further committee inquiry.
Defeated 20 to 33. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The vote rejected a broader Opposition package on approvals, net gain and nuclear provisions.
Moved by Roberts (One Nation). Defeated 3 to 39. Support came from One Nation. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Liberal Party, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents.
The vote rejected One Nation’s statement of concerns about the package.
Defeated 26 to 33. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The vote rejected postponing the package until 2026.
Passed 33 to 19. Support came from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and One Nation.
This was the major counted vote adopting Greens changes to the broader environment package.
Defeated 4 to 35. Support came from Australia's Voice and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Liberal Party, and One Nation.
The vote rejected a crossbench package focused on forestry, fossil fuels and climate duty.
Moved by Tyrrell. Defeated 5 to 35. Support came from Australia's Voice, One Nation, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and Liberal Party.
The vote rejected a crossbench package on clearing, transparency and restoration charges.
Defeated 22 to 31. Support came from Liberal Party, Australia's Voice, Nationals, One Nation, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The vote rejected an Opposition attempt to strengthen external review of the new agency.
Government amendments allowed the minister to extend when a decision that an action is not a controlled action lapses; they were carried on voices.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Government amendments dealt with environment protection order duration and tightened unacceptable-impact criteria; they were carried on voices.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Greens amendments narrowed when exclusion determinations can remove actions from existing declarations or agreements; they were carried on voices.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Lidia Thorpe’s amendments on a First Nations standard, cultural heritage, sacred sites and UNDRIP rights were defeated on voices.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
This list includes amendment votes, procedural votes and votes on the bill itself.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Tony Burke introduced the bill as the information and reporting part of the government’s environmental law reforms, saying better national data would support clearer environmental decisions.
Read in Hansard ↗Jonathon Duniam opposed the wider environment package, arguing it was being rushed through after a Labor-Greens deal and would harm forestry, resources, housing and energy projects.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
25 speakers · 1 support · 24 unclear
“The Environment Information Australia Bill 2025 (the EIA Bill) would establish the statutory position of the Head of Environment Information Australia (HEIA), to provide national leadership for improving the availability and accessibility of high-quality, national environmental data and information.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
17 speakers · 18 contributions · 2 oppose · 15 unclear
“This is not democracy at its best. These are dodgy deals at the end of a sitting”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Leon Rebello on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Read this contribution in Hansard ↗Second reading speech
Read this contribution in Hansard ↗“we could not possibly even have a test of what 'unacceptable impacts' is going to mean”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
4 speakers · 2 mixed · 2 unclear
“We have made it harder for fossil fuel corporations to wreck the environment, and we’ve secured new protections for native forests.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“we have managed to secure a better outcome for nature, with new protections for our native forests, our Australian bushland, and new protections for our endangered animals”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
6 speakers · 6 unclear
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 91 to 32.
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 35 to 24.
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Committee of the Whole debate
Committee of the WholeA Senate stage where senators examine and vote on detailed amendments to a bill. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 32 to 20.
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.
Environment and Communications Legislation Committee; Committee report (02/04/2026)
Referred to committee
The bill was referred to Environment and Communications Legislation Committee; Committee report (02/04/2026).
Referred to Committee (30 Oct 2025): Environment and Communications Legislation Committee; Committee report (2 Apr 2026)
APH bill page notes