Rushed scrutiny of a large package
Some MPs and senators said Parliament was being asked to deal with a large and complex environment package before the Senate committee process had run its course.
This bill became law on Dec 1st, 2025.
Climate, energy & environment
The Act lets regulationsLegal rules made under an Act. This Act leaves the chargeable activities, charge amounts, calculation methods and exemptions to regulations. impose charges that are neither customs duties nor excise duties for prescribed matters connected with administering the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999Australia's main national environment law. The charging Act relates to costs connected with administering this Act and regulations made under it..
The bill was introduced to support cost recoveryA funding approach where charges are set to recover no more than the Commonwealth's likely costs for the relevant matter. for the administration of the EPBC ActAustralia's main national environment law. The charging Act relates to costs connected with administering this Act and regulations made under it. as part of the government's broader environment reform package. The explanatory memorandum says the actual chargeable activities and amounts would be set later in regulationsLegal rules made under an Act. This Act leaves the chargeable activities, charge amounts, calculation methods and exemptions to regulations., with the general charges bill covering charges that are neither customs duties nor excise duties.
This general charging law sits inside the government's broader rewrite of national environment laws. Its narrow role is to let regulationsLegal rules made under an Act. This Act leaves the chargeable activities, charge amounts, calculation methods and exemptions to regulations. impose non-customs, non-excise cost-recovery charges for EPBC ActAustralia's main national environment law. The charging Act relates to costs connected with administering this Act and regulations made under it. administration, while the larger package dealt with environmental standards, a national regulator, project approvals, data and reporting.
Direct criticism of the general charging bill was limited because most debate treated it as one narrow bill in a much larger environment reform package. Critics mainly argued the overall package was rushed, would add green tape or project uncertainty, or still failed to go far enough on climate and nature protection.
Mr Tony Burke, for the government introduced this bill. It passed with support from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, some crossbench members; opposed by Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, some crossbench members.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 01 Dec 2025
Final passage
Recorded final vote
1 counted final-passage vote was recorded.
Passage speed
32 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
The Act lets regulationsLegal rules made under an Act. This Act leaves the chargeable activities, charge amounts, calculation methods and exemptions to regulations. impose charges that are neither customs duties nor excise duties for prescribed matters connected with administering the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999Australia's main national environment law. The charging Act relates to costs connected with administering this Act and regulations made under it..
It is one of three linked charging laws. Separate general, customs and excise laws were used because section 55 of the ConstitutionThe constitutional rule that led the government to use separate general, customs and excise charging bills. requires those kinds of taxation to be dealt with separately.
The Act does not set the activities or dollar amounts. Those details can be set later by regulationsLegal rules made under an Act. This Act leaves the chargeable activities, charge amounts, calculation methods and exemptions to regulations., either as a fixed amount or by a calculation method.
Before a charge is prescribed, the Minister must be satisfied it is designed to recover no more than the Commonwealth is likely to spend on the relevant matter.
RegulationsLegal rules made under an Act. This Act leaves the chargeable activities, charge amounts, calculation methods and exemptions to regulations. can also create exemptions from a general chargeA charge imposed under this Act only if it is neither a customs duty nor an excise duty., and the related Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025 supplies the authority to collect and recover charges under the EPBC ActAustralia's main national environment law. The charging Act relates to costs connected with administering this Act and regulations made under it..
The regulations may prescribe a charge in relation to a prescribed matter connected with the administration of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 or regulations made under that Act.Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Act 2025 final Act text
Three separate Charging Bills are required because section 55 of the Constitution requires that matters of excise, customs and other taxation that is neither excise nor customs are to be dealt with in separate Acts.Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) explanatory memorandum
The regulations may prescribe a charge under subsection 7(1): (a) by specifying an amount as the charge; or (b) by specifying a method for calculating the amount of the charge.Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Act 2025 final Act text
Before the Governor-General makes a regulation under subsection 7(1) prescribing a charge in relation to a matter, the Minister must be satisfied that the amount of the charge is set at a level that is designed to recover no more than the Commonwealth’s likely costs in connection with the matter.Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Act 2025 final Act text
Authority to collect and recover charges imposed under the Charging Bills will be provided by proposed amendments to the EPBC Act in the Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025.Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) explanatory memorandum
Context
This general charging law sits inside the government's broader rewrite of national environment laws. Its narrow role is to let regulationsLegal rules made under an Act. This Act leaves the chargeable activities, charge amounts, calculation methods and exemptions to regulations. impose non-customs, non-excise cost-recovery charges for EPBC ActAustralia's main national environment law. The charging Act relates to costs connected with administering this Act and regulations made under it. administration, while the larger package dealt with environmental standards, a national regulator, project approvals, data and reporting.
Samuel review frames environment-law reform
Debate on the package repeatedly linked the 2025 reforms to Professor Graeme Samuel's 2020 review of the EPBC ActAustralia's main national environment law. The charging Act relates to costs connected with administering this Act and regulations made under it. and the need to update national environment laws.
House and Senate debate excerpts ↗Charging bills introduced with the reform package
The general charges bill was introduced with related customs and excise charging bills, so each type of tax could be dealt with separately under section 55 of the ConstitutionThe constitutional rule that led the government to use separate general, customs and excise charging bills..
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) explanatory memorandum ↗Senate committee inquiry receives the package
The APH notes record referral to the Environment and Communications Legislation Committee, with a report date listed for 2 April 2026, although the bill later passed before that date.
APH bill page notes ↗Senate considers package-wide amendments
The Senate Journal records defeated Opposition, One Nation and crossbench amendments, and carried government and Greens amendments affecting the wider environment package.
Senate Journal ↗Senate passes the bill package
The Senate agreed to the remaining stages of the bills and passed them after a counted vote of 32 ayes to 20 noes.
Senate Journal ↗General Charges Act receives Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act.
Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. turned the bill into Act No. 66 of 2025. Sections 3 to 10 commence by proclamationA formal instrument used to start parts of an Act on a chosen date. Sections 3 to 10 of this Act start by proclamation, or automatically after 12 months if no proclamation is made., or automatically after 12 months if not proclaimed earlier.
APH progress table and final Act text ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The package was referred to the Environment and Communications Legislation Committee, with a report date listed for 2 April 2026. The bill later passed both houses on 27 November 2025.
Referred to committee
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Recorded vote: 89 to 40.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Recorded vote: 35 to 24.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Recorded vote: 32 to 20.
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
Direct criticism of the general charging bill was limited because most debate treated it as one narrow bill in a much larger environment reform package. Critics mainly argued the overall package was rushed, would add green tape or project uncertainty, or still failed to go far enough on climate and nature protection.
The charging Act mainly creates a regulation-making framework for cost-recovery charges. The strongest criticism in the collected local record was aimed at the wider EPBC reform package debated with it.
Rushed scrutiny of a large package
Some MPs and senators said Parliament was being asked to deal with a large and complex environment package before the Senate committee process had run its course.
Concern about green tape
Coalition and regional speakers argued the package could add regulatory burden, uncertainty and legal risk for farmers, forestry, resources, housing and other projects.
Climate protections still incomplete
Greens speakers supported the final package after negotiations but said it still did not create full climate protections or a full climate trigger for new coal and gas projects.
Further sources
Votes
The chamber-passage votes come first. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Passed 32 to 20. Support came from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and One Nation. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
Earlier bill-stage votes
Passed 89 to 40. Support came from Labor and Centre Alliance. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
Passed 35 to 24. Support came from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and One Nation. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.
Senate
Defeated 13 to 35. Support came from Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, One Nation, and Nationals.
The vote rejected a Greens statement on First Nations consent before the Senate moved on.
Moved by Jonathon Duniam (Liberal Party). Defeated 19 to 34. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents.
The vote rejected an Opposition attempt to narrow when serious environmental impacts would block action.
Defeated 4 to 44. Support came from Australia's Voice and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Liberal Party, and One Nation.
The vote rejected most of a crossbench criticism of the package.
Defeated 27 to 33. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens.
The vote rejected delaying passage for further committee inquiry.
Defeated 20 to 33. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The vote rejected a broader Opposition package on approvals, net gain and nuclear provisions.
Moved by Roberts (One Nation). Defeated 3 to 39. Support came from One Nation. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Liberal Party, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents.
The vote rejected One Nation’s statement of concerns about the package.
Defeated 26 to 33. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The vote rejected postponing the package until 2026.
Passed 33 to 19. Support came from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and One Nation.
This was the major counted vote adopting Greens changes to the broader environment package.
Defeated 4 to 35. Support came from Australia's Voice and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Liberal Party, and One Nation.
The vote rejected a crossbench package focused on forestry, fossil fuels and climate duty.
Moved by Tyrrell. Defeated 5 to 35. Support came from Australia's Voice, One Nation, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and Liberal Party.
The vote rejected a crossbench package on clearing, transparency and restoration charges.
Defeated 22 to 31. Support came from Liberal Party, Australia's Voice, Nationals, One Nation, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The vote rejected an Opposition attempt to strengthen external review of the new agency.
Government amendments allowed the minister to extend when a decision that an action is not a controlled action lapses; they were carried on voices.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Government amendments dealt with environment protection order duration and tightened unacceptable-impact criteria; they were carried on voices.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Greens amendments narrowed when exclusion determinations can remove actions from existing declarations or agreements; they were carried on voices.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Lidia Thorpe’s amendments on a First Nations standard, cultural heritage, sacred sites and UNDRIP rights were defeated on voices.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
This list includes amendment votes, procedural votes and votes on the bill itself.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Tony Burke introduced the bill as a cost-recovery charging framework for matters connected with administering the EPBC ActAustralia's main national environment law. The charging Act relates to costs connected with administering this Act and regulations made under it., with the chargeable activities and amounts to be set later in regulationsLegal rules made under an Act. This Act leaves the chargeable activities, charge amounts, calculation methods and exemptions to regulations..
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
25 speakers · 1 support · 24 unclear
“The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Bill 2025 would provide a framework to impose charges in relation to prescribed matters connected with the administration of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
17 speakers · 18 contributions · 17 unclear
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Leon Rebello on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Read this contribution in Hansard ↗Second reading speech
Read this contribution in Hansard ↗4 speakers · 4 unclear
6 speakers · 6 unclear
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 89 to 40.
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 35 to 24.
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Committee of the Whole debate
Committee of the WholeA Senate stage where senators examine and vote on detailed amendments to a bill. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 32 to 20.
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.
Environment and Communications Legislation Committee; Committee report (02/04/2026)
Referred to committee
The package was referred to the Environment and Communications Legislation Committee, with a report date listed for 2 April 2026. The bill later passed both houses on 27 November 2025.
Referred to Committee (30 Oct 2025): Environment and Communications Legislation Committee; Committee report (2 Apr 2026)
APH bill page notes