Shorter temporary power
The minister’s temporary power to modify the aged care system should last 12 months, not 24 months.
This bill became law on Sep 19th, 2025.
Health, care & disability
The Act mainly updates aged care laws so the new Aged Care Act 2024The new main law for government-funded aged care, replacing older aged care legislation. can start properly, replacing the main older Commonwealth aged care laws and helping move the system into the new framework.
With the Aged Care Act 2024The new main law for government-funded aged care, replacing older aged care legislation. due to commence on 1 November 2025 and replace the main existing aged care laws, changes were needed to avoid disruption as people moved to the new system. The bill makes technical, transitional and consequential amendments to the new Act, transitional provisions and related legislation to support its commencement and implementation.
By Jun 2025, Calls for urgent home support packages after delay. 8 linked events in total — see the timeline below.
The main criticism was that the bill and transition settings gave the minister too much temporary power and needed tighter oversight, including shorter time limits and review of temporary rules. That concern was raised mainly by the opposition and crossbench amendments, but support remained conditional and the Senate committee still recommended the bills pass without delay.
The Labor government introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 19 Sept 2025
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
4 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
42 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
The Act mainly updates aged care laws so the new Aged Care Act 2024The new main law for government-funded aged care, replacing older aged care legislation. can start properly, replacing the main older Commonwealth aged care laws and helping move the system into the new framework.
It includes protections for people already receiving care, including rules to help make sure existing recipients are not worse off, and it keeps older people’s unspent funds available to them under the new system.
It also strengthens quality and administration by requiring regular review of the Aged Care Quality Standards, allowing compliance history to inform Star Ratings, and permitting automated means-testing and subsidy decisions by Services Australia and the Department of Veterans’ Affairs.
The final Act was strengthened to get home-care support out faster: previously available but unreleased home care packagesGovernment-funded bundles of in-home aged-care services for older people living independently. must be released as soon as practicable after Royal Assent, a further 20,000 packages must be made available before the Aged Care Act 2024The new main law for government-funded aged care, replacing older aged care legislation. starts, and binding 2025–26 targets now require at least 83,000 home-support services in total, with reasons to be given and tabled in Parliament if deadlines are missed.
The Act also supports the changeover by allowing use of information from the old system and by creating a temporary power to deal with unforeseen transition problems. In the final Act, that ministerial power was cut from 24 months to 12 months, and rules made under it were made subject to a new Senate committee review mechanism.
The Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 (the ACOLA Bill) makes technical and consequential amendments to support the commencement of the Aged Care Act 2024 (the new Act). The new Act replaces the Aged Care Act 1997 (the old Act), the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission Act 2018 (the Commission Act) and the Aged Care (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997 (the old Transitional Provisions Act) as the Commonwealth’s primary aged care legislation.Explanatory memorandum
allow different subsidy calculators to be set out in the rules for cohorts of people who are already receiving funding under the aged care system, implementing the ‘no worse off’ principleExplanatory memorandum
mandate a review of the Aged Care Quality Standards every five yearsExplanatory memorandum
Outline and Financial impact statementExplanatory memorandum
introducing a new time-limited rule making power which empowers the Minister, during the first two years of operation of the new Act, to make rules modifying the operation of primary legislation to ensure that continuity of care is maintained for older persons in the event of unforeseen or unintended circumstances arising during transition and implementation of the new rights-based aged care system established by the new Act.Explanatory memorandum
Context
By Jun 2025, Calls for urgent home support packages after delay. 8 linked events in total — see the timeline below.
Royal Commission final report tabled
The royal commission tabled its final report and called for a new aged care act that put older people's rights at the centre of the system.
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care ↗Aged Care Bill 2024 passes Parliament
Parliament passed the Aged Care Bill 2024, setting up the rights-based framework that the later amendment bill had to support.
Australian Government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing ↗New Aged Care Act commencement deferred to 1 November 2025
The government deferred commencement of the new Aged Care Act to 1 November 2025 to give providers more time to prepare and to finish supporting legislation.
Australian Government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing ↗Calls for urgent home support packages after delay
Crossbenchers, peak bodies and advocates warned that the delay would worsen the home-care backlog, with about 80,000 people already waiting.
ABC News ↗Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 introduced
The government introduced the bill to make technical and consequential changes before the new aged care act started.
Parliament of Australia ↗Senate committee recommends passing the bills without delay
The Senate Community Affairs Legislation CommitteeSenate committee that examined this bill and related aged care measures in detail. recommended that the Senate pass the bills without delay after examining the transition rules, automation and other implementation issues.
Parliament of Australia ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
The House sent the bill to the Federation ChamberSecondary House of Representatives forum where bills can be debated before returning to the House. so debate could continue in that parallel forum before reporting back to the House. For this bill, the Federation ChamberSecondary House of Representatives forum where bills can be debated before returning to the House. reported back later the same day and the House then completed its remaining formal steps that day.
Referred to Federation ChamberSecondary House of Representatives forum where bills can be debated before returning to the House.
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
Second reading debate
The Federation ChamberSecondary House of Representatives forum where bills can be debated before returning to the House. finished its work on the bill and reported it back to the House for the next formal step. The official House record shows the referral out and return both happened on the same day, before the House moved to its final formal votes.
Reported from Federation ChamberSecondary House of Representatives forum where bills can be debated before returning to the House.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber. Later message exchanges with the other chamber were still recorded afterwards.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The Senate Community Affairs Legislation CommitteeSenate committee that examined this bill and related aged care measures in detail. examined the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 and a related bill, and recommended that the Senate pass the bills without delay. The report focused on the government's aged care reform agenda, including a rights-based framework for older people, and considered issues such as ministerial rule-making powers, automation, the Higher Everyday Living Fee, the delayed Inspector-General review, and privacy and human rights protections.
Referred; report published
Committee report (21 Aug 2025)Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human RightsParliamentary committee that reviews bills for compatibility with human rights. considered the bill in Report 4 of 2025 on 27/08/2025. It raised privacy and rights of persons with disability issues, including expanding the definition of ‘guardian’, and sought a ministerial response.
Considered in published report
Report 4 of 2025Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of BillsSenate committee that checks bills for effects on rights, liberties and parliamentary scrutiny. considered the bill in Scrutiny Digest 4 of 2025 on 27/08/2025. It raised personal rights and liberties, administrative powers, and review of decisions issues, including significant matters in delegated legislation, and sought a ministerial response.
Considered in published report
Scrutiny Digest 4 of 2025Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it. Amendment: 1 Opposition (in part) and 1 Australian Greens agreed to.
Second reading debate :
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
Senators examined the bill in detail and considered amendments clause by clause. Amendment: 5 Opposition and 1 Australia's Voice agreed to Requests: 4 Opposition and 2 Independent (Senator Pocock) agreed to.
Committee of the Whole debate
The Senate agreed to the bill but asked the House to make changes before the bill could complete passage.
Bill agreed to, subject to requests
The House agreed to make the changes requested by the Senate, which let the bill continue toward final passage. The main requested changes were: The final Act was strengthened to force earlier release of home-care support: it added new Schedules 4 and 5 requiring all previously available but unreleased home care packagesGovernment-funded bundles of in-home aged-care services for older people living independently. to be released as soon as practicable after Royal Assent, and requiring a further 20,000 packages to be available and released before the Aged Care Act 2024The new main law for government-funded aged care, replacing older aged care legislation. starts. It also inserted binding 2025–26 targets for at least 83,000 home-support services in total—requiring the guaranteed tranche 1 number by 31 December 2025 and at least 43,000 more by 30 June 2026—with the System Governor required to give reasons and the Minister to table them in Parliament if those deadlines are missed.
Consideration of Senate message
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The House agreed to the Senate's amendments, so the bill could proceed in the amended form. The main amendments were: Separately, the temporary ministerial power to modify the aged care system during transition was cut from 24 months to 12 months, and a new Senate committee review mechanism was added for rules made under that power.
Consideration of Senate message
After the final message exchange, both Houses had agreed on the same text of the bill and it was ready for assent.
Key criticism
The main criticism was that the bill and transition settings gave the minister too much temporary power and needed tighter oversight, including shorter time limits and review of temporary rules. That concern was raised mainly by the opposition and crossbench amendments, but support remained conditional and the Senate committee still recommended the bills pass without delay.
Criticism was narrow and focused on safeguards rather than rejecting the reform package.
Shorter temporary power
The minister’s temporary power to modify the aged care system should last 12 months, not 24 months.
Committee review
Temporary rules changing the aged care system should be reviewed by a Senate committee within three months of being tabled.
Extra safeguards
The committee noted questions about ministerial rule-making powers, automation, privacy, human rights, and the delayed Inspector-General review.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Amendments grouped by chamber. Expand any amendment to see the party breakdown or, where it passed on the voices, how that works.
Senate
Moved by The Hon Anne Ruston (Liberal Party of Australia). Defeated 26 to 32. Support came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, UAP, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens.
Defeat left out these implementation demands; the bill itself was unchanged.
Moved by Wendy Askew (Liberal Party of Australia). Passed 33 to 22. Support came from Liberal, Greens, One Nation, Nationals, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor.
Carried criticism of delays into the second-reading motion; bill text stayed unchanged.
Moved by Wendy Askew (Liberal Party of Australia). Defeated 23 to 33. Support came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and UAP. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents.
Defeat avoided adding that condemnation; the bill itself did not change.
Moved by Penny Allman-Payne (Australian Greens). Defeated 12 to 29. Support came from Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, and UAP.
Defeat rejected that criticism and call; the bill text was unchanged.
Would add Senate criticism that the bill keeps a pathway for under-65s in aged care and urge their exit to disability supports.
Would add Senate criticism that the bill keeps a pathway for under-65s in aged care and urge their exit to disability supports.
Passed on the voices
The chamber agreed to this amendment without a counted vote — the presiding officer judged the ayes louder than the noes, and no member called for a division.
Would let a Senate committee review temporary rules changing the aged care system within three months of tabling and report back.
Would let a Senate committee review temporary rules changing the aged care system within three months of tabling and report back.
Passed on the voices
The chamber agreed to this amendment without a counted vote — the presiding officer judged the ayes louder than the noes, and no member called for a division.
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.
The parliamentary record also shows 4 Opposition requests and 2 Independent requests agreed without a counted division.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
The minister introduces the bill as a package of technical, transitional and consequential amendments to support the commencement of the Aged Care Act 2024The new main law for government-funded aged care, replacing older aged care legislation., including subsidy, automation, privacy, star ratings and related consequential changes.
Read in Hansard ↗Ruston strongly criticises the government’s handling of aged-care reforms and delays, arguing the bill is necessary only because of government failures and urging action on home-care waitlists and implementation details.
Read in Hansard ↗Sharkie supports the bill as a measure to implement the new aged-care framework, while raising serious concerns about broad ministerial rule-making powers, automated decision-making, implementation timing, and the impact of delays and higher costs on older Australians.
Read in Hansard ↗Joyce stresses the importance of aged care, especially for small community-run facilities in regional towns, and urges the government to tailor policy to keep those services open and remove costly burdens such as carbon offset requirements.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
7 speakers · 9 contributions · 6 support · 1 unclear
“Therefore, this bill will provide further support for the Albanese Labor government's ambition to transform the experience of older Australians receiving care, wherever they reside across the country.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We know that the need is urgent, and it's not acceptable to have older Australians dying at home, as we heard last week, while waiting for a care package. We know that. It is not acceptable. It reflects how broken this system is and why it is so urgent that this parliament and the Senate pass the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 and the associated bill. We are completely overhauling this system. At the heart of it is the wishes of older Australians. It is a generational reform that we will reap the benefits of for years to come.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This Bill provides further support for our ambition to transform the experience of older Australians receiving care.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Across this chamber, I hope that we can all agree on this single point: that aged-care reform is a priority, so that we can ensure our older Australians are supported, and that this reform must proceed without delay.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 3 separate contributions by Rae, including an amendment-moving contribution. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Moved amendment
The minister introduces the bill as a package of technical, transitional and consequential amendments to support the commencement of the Aged Care Act 2024The new main law for government-funded aged care, replacing older aged care legislation., including subsidy, automation, privacy, star ratings and related consequential changes. He presents it as strengthening and supporting the broader aged-care reforms due to commence on 1 November 2025.
“To conclude, this bill builds on the new and enduring foundation for the Australian aged-care system from 1 November 2025, and for many years to come.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS;Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025;Consideration of Senate Message - 04 Sep 2025
The minister supports the bill as part of the government's aged-care reforms, saying it will expand home-care support and help older Australians receive safer, higher-quality care at home. He highlights extra home-care packagesGovernment-funded bundles of in-home aged-care services for older people living independently. before the new Aged Care Act begins and presents the bill as a key step in those broader reforms.
“This Labor government is committed to ensuring that older Australians get the care they need and the care that they deserve. The bipartisan passage of the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 is the latest milestone in our generational aged-care reforms.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS;Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025;Consideration of Senate Message - 04 Sep 2025
The minister says the bill will prepare the aged-care system for the new Aged Care Act by supporting the Support at HomeThe Commonwealth's new in-home aged-care program that replaces the previous Home Care Packages scheme. program, stronger quality standards and implementation of royal commission recommendations. He argues its passage will help deliver a fairer, rights-based aged-care system that gives older Australians better care, dignity and support.
“The passage of this bill brings the reform process one step closer. We're one step closer to bringing the key recommendation of the royal commission to fruition with a new rights based aged-care act that delivers the dignified care that older Australians deserve.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“These bills ensure the new rights based system starts well on 1 November. They protect people during transition, strengthen accountability and keep the focus on quality. This is another practical step in putting the care back into aged care and in giving families the confidence that the system will be there for them when they need it. I commend the bills to the Senate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Ms RYAN (Lalor—Chief Government Whip) (10:15): I declare that, unless otherwise ordered, the following bills stand referred to the Federation Chamber for further consideration: Defence Housing Australia Amendment Bill 2025, Health Insurance (Pathology) (Fees) (Repeal) Bill 2025, Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, Aged Care (Accommodation Payment Security) Levy Amendment Bill 2025, and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2025 and Pacific Banking Guarantee Bill 2025 at the adjournment of the debate on the motion for the second reading of each bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
9 speakers · 13 contributions · 6 support · 2 mixed · 1 unclear
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Ruston on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
BILLS - Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, Aged Care (Accommodation Payment Security) Levy Amendment Bill 2025 - Second Reading
Ruston says the coalition will not block the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 and related levy bill, describing them as essential to implementing the Aged Care Act 2024The new main law for government-funded aged care, replacing older aged care legislation. and royal commission recommendations. However, she strongly criticises Labor for poor drafting, rejecting earlier coalition amendments, and having to return with extensive corrective amendments.
“We will not be standing in the way of the passage of these bills, but—let me be very clear—the Aged Care Act 2024 was a package of reforms of the Labor Party's making.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS - Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, Aged Care (Accommodation Payment Security) Levy Amendment Bill 2025 - Second Reading
Ruston strongly criticises the government’s handling of aged-care reforms and delays, arguing the bill is necessary only because of government failures and urging action on home-care waitlists and implementation details. Despite those criticisms, she says the coalition will not delay the bill and that it must pass promptly so the Aged Care Act and supporting rules can proceed.
“The coalition remains absolutely committed to an aged-care system that provides dignity, choice and control to Australians. As this legislation is essential for the delivery of the Aged Care Act, the coalition will not seek to delay the passage of this bill, because without the passage of this bill the Aged Care Rules cannot be registered, and we know how essential the final release of supported legislation is to ensuring a smooth transition. That is why this bill must be passed without delay to ensure older Australians can finally receive the care this government has promised them and has failed to deliver.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“Aged care is very important. Every person goes through that time in their life, if they're lucky, when they have to consider the welfare of their parents or of people that they've grown to love and consider how they will look after them when they are vulnerable and unable to look after themselves. This is where aged care is so vitally important. Going into aged care is very similar to going to boarding school. You're going to an area that is different; it is not your home. The very disconcerting thing is that it's a boarding school you're never going to leave. This is a time of fear in people's lives, and we have a role to make sure that we placate that fear and that we provide these people with the greatest dignity we can possibly afford them. This is why this accommodation payment security levy is part and parcel with providing that security.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We won't seek to delay the passage of this bill—Australians deserve better than broken promises and more procrastination and delay by this Albanese Labor government; I understand that—but these changes have to be scrutinised to ensure the process of reform can be implemented in the best way possible, because, at the end of the day, our society is ageing, and we need to provide the very best quality of care.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Senator COLLINS (New South Wales—Deputy Opposition Whip in the Senate) (09:57): I rise to speak on the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025. I do so in the interests of ensuring that our senior Australians receive the best care, which they deserve. Importantly, this means making the rollout of aged-care support as seamless and timely as possible. The coalition and I support the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, subject to our amendments. This bill is integral to delivering the Aged Care Act 2024 and, hence, essential to delivering the recommendations of the aged-care royal commission instituted under the former coalition government.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“My colleague Senator Ruston has rightly said that aged-care reform must be about dignity and clarity. It must be about ensuring timely access to care, especially in regional and remote communities, and it must be about fixing the system at its source, not just patching it up after the fact. I want to acknowledge the work Senator Ruston has done as shadow minister for health and aged care to improve the original legislation and the advocacy she continues here to further improve upon these bills. The coalition supports these bills because they contain the safeguards we fought for last year, but we will not let the government escape scrutiny, because these reforms are too important for us as a parliament not to get right. You only have to stand in the shoes of the millions of Australians navigating the aged-care system for the first time—for their families and for the patients themselves—to feel the sense of bewilderment, confusion and loss of independence. It will never be an easy process, but the government can make it more bearable because every older Australian deserves dignity, respect and access to the care they need, not just in principle but in practice.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by McIntosh on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
BILLS - Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, Aged Care (Accommodation Payment Security) Levy Amendment Bill 2025 - Second Reading
McIntosh supports the bill, arguing it is needed to implement coalition-negotiated protections in the aged-care reforms, including the 'no worse off' principle and removal of caps on cleaning and gardening. She sharply criticises the government’s handling of aged-care reform and delays, and says the bills should be scrutinised through inquiries, but states the coalition will not seek to delay their passage.
“Again, the coalition supports the need for this legislation to deliver on the important changes we fought hard for, for the benefit of hardworking Australians. But we remain extremely disappointed by this government's refusal to listen to aged-care providers and its complete neglect of older Australians who need support to stay in their own homes. That is why we'll be seeking to refer both the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 and the Aged Care (Accommodation Payment Security) Levy Amendment Bill 2025 for Senate inquiries to ensure adequate consultation for the benefit of older Australians who rely on the aged-care sector. The coalition strongly supports all older Australians having access to the care they need and deserve.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS;Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025;Consideration of Senate Message - 04 Sep 2025
McIntosh supports the bill as an important outcome that forces the government to release more aged-care places, though she argues it only happened after intense opposition pressure and condemns Labor for delaying support to older Australians. She frames the bill’s amendments as a win for Australians and an historic change, while stressing the government should never have let the situation reach this point.
“We are pleased—I don't know if 'pleased' is the word or if 'satisfied' is even the word. We accept that we are now in this position where the government has relented and agreed, through huge pressure that we've given on behalf of the Australian people, to make these amendments, to approve them, to bring them back here. It's an historic amendment for this parliament. It's a testament that, even though we may be small in opposition, every single member of parliament here is loud in the support that we have for our people right across Australia.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Liddle on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
BILLS - Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, Aged Care (Accommodation Payment Security) Levy Amendment Bill 2025 - Second Reading
Liddle says the coalition supports the bill’s passage as a necessary measure to avoid further disruption in aged care, while arguing it mainly exists because of Labor’s failures and delays. She also highlights coalition-negotiated protections such as grandfathering arrangements and removal of service caps.
“The coalition supports the passage of the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 because it is necessary to prevent further chaos in the aged-care sector.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS - Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, Aged Care (Accommodation Payment Security) Levy Amendment Bill 2025 - Second Reading
Senator Liddle supports the bill, arguing it is essential to aged-care delivery and implementation of the royal commission recommendations. She strongly criticises the Albanese government for delays, poor preparation and having to amend its own reforms after rejecting coalition amendments.
“The coalition supports this legislation. Our support, however, comes with the recognition that it is yet another example of the Albanese government playing catch-up, fixing their own mistakes and trying to cover up their own lack of preparedness.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“I'm pleased to speak to this request for amendments to the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, received from the Senate. These are historic amendments for this parliament.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Blyth on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
BILLS - Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, Aged Care (Accommodation Payment Security) Levy Amendment Bill 2025 - Second Reading
Senator Blyth says the coalition will allow the bill to pass because it is necessary, overdue, and needed to implement the Aged Care Act 2024The new main law for government-funded aged care, replacing older aged care legislation. and royal commission recommendations. She supports aged-care reform but strongly criticises the government's rollout as rushed, chaotic and poorly planned, citing long waits for home-care packagesGovernment-funded bundles of in-home aged-care services for older people living independently..
“The coalition will not stand in the way of the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 and the related bill moving through and being approved, because it is necessary and it is overdue. It is essential to delivering the Aged Care Act 2024 and implementing the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, which was instituted under the former coalition government. The coalition supports aged-care reform. We support a system that delivers dignity, safety and quality care to older Australians. What we do not support is a reform process that is rushed and poorly planned and leaves vulnerable Australians behind.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS - Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, Aged Care (Accommodation Payment Security) Levy Amendment Bill 2025 - Second Reading
Senator Blyth criticises the government's handling of aged-care reform and argues the bill exposes Labor's lack of readiness, but says the coalition will not delay it because the reforms cannot proceed without it. She supports the bill on a conditional basis, highlighting protections for existing recipients and the removal of caps on cleaning and gardening services while stating the coalition supports it with amendments.
“Aged-care reform is not just about legislation; it is about people. It is about the grandmother who needs help to stay in her home, the veteran who deserves respect in his final years and the carer who is stretched to breaking point. This government has failed to deliver on its promises. The delay in home-care packages is a national crisis. The waitlist has tripled under Labor's watch. Minister Rae must urgently deliver the promised 83,000 packages and provide certainty to providers planning for workforce demands. The coalition supports this bill with amendments. We will continue to hold the government accountable, demand transparency and advocate for those who have been left behind. Older Australians deserve better than another broken promise, and we will not support a process that puts politics before people.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
3 speakers · 1 mixed · 2 unclear
“There are so many issues present in these bills—bills that will affect the lives of millions of Australians. The Greens once again urge the government to work in good faith with older people and their advocates to address these issues. I foreshadow a second reading amendment in my name and a second reading amendment in the name of Senator Allman-Payne.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Older people are not commodities. They must be treated with respect, dignity and care. The Greens welcome small changes and technical improvements, but we do not expect the reforms made by this government to prevent or even meaningfully delay the onset of a state of rolling crisis in Australia's aged-care system. As aged-care expert Professor Kathy Eagar AM stated in her submission to the aged-care bill 2024 inquiry:”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Ms WATSON-BROWN: yes—to bring forward 20,000 new home-care packages. Amendments passed by the Senate have forced the government to urgently negotiate and bring forward that release of 20,000 home-care packages and front-load the release of the Support at Home program from 1 November. The Greens have for a long time been pushing the government hard to take action, chairing a Senate inquiry into the issue and putting forward amendments to the government's aged-care legislation. My Greens colleague Senator Penny Allman-Payne has worked very hard at this, and it is a credit to the work of her, to Senator David Pocock and to Senator Ruston that this reform has been achieved. This will begin the work of addressing the urgent needs of over 200,000 older Australians waiting 12 months or more for basic care like showering, cooking and cleaning. But there are still over 200,000 people on the waiting list for Support at Home, and this win will barely touch the sides. We're still seeing care rationed and older people treated, sadly, like commodities.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 support
“I think that these amendments that have come down from the Senate are desperately needed by our nation, by our oldest people. We in here all enjoy the nation that we live in because of them. So I commend these amendments, which were very hard fought and won. Let us hope that we never again in Australia get to a position where we have nearly 5,000 Australians in a year dying waiting for care.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
5 speakers · 5 support
“In conclusion, while I support this bill, and despite a royal commission, there are still many failings in how we deliver aged care in our nation. Overall, we need to do much, much better by our older Australians.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I join my colleagues in the Senate in saying that I won't be delaying the bill. I'm glad we finally got to it. This clearly needs to pass for Support at Home to commence in November, but the Senate does have a right to make really sensible amendments. I foreshadow that I'll be moving an amendment that would see the release of 20,000 new home-care packages. We all know it can be done. The department has said as much. We know that they can be provided. Providers have said publicly that they have capacity, and we know that there is need. This is urgent. This is the opportunity for the government to change the lives of 20,000 older Australians and, in most cases, change the lives of their families. I urge the government: this is an opportunity to do the right thing, to do the thing that the evidence suggests we need to do leading up to 1 November and to do the thing that is in the best interests of older Australians. You'll have an opportunity when other senators and I move amendments to the main bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I support this bill, but I take this opportunity to highlight serious deficiencies in the current home-care system, which my constituents are so very much relying on, before the new Aged Care Act and support-at-home system commences.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I also want to acknowledge everyone who has played a part in this. I wrote to the government last year about my concerns with home-care packages, based on the feedback I'd got from constituents. I was proud to work with Senator Pocock and others earlier, just after the election, when there was concern that the packages would be delayed, to say that they should not be delayed. I've been proud to stand up with other members of the crossbench and across the parliament to say: 'This is important. These changes are required, and it's time to put them through.' This is a positive day for the parliament. This is a good choice, and I'm proud to have been part of that. Certainly my community will be extremely grateful for the changes that have been made to this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Mr GEE (Calare) (10:17): I also rise to support the release of these 20,000 home-care packages. I believe it is an important step forward for the parliament and also for the nation. Most people in our communities know how important home care is to our seniors and the difference that it makes to people's lives. I think everyone was shocked that these packages were being withheld. The feedback from the Calare electorate, in the Central West of New South Wales, is that the packages need to be released on the double and that we need to get help to our seniors to help with their amenity of life and the support that they need.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation ChamberSecondary House of Representatives forum where bills can be debated before returning to the House.
The House sent the bill to the Federation ChamberSecondary House of Representatives forum where bills can be debated before returning to the House. so debate could continue in that parallel forum before reporting back to the House.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
House · Reported from Federation Chamber
Reported from Federation ChamberSecondary House of Representatives forum where bills can be debated before returning to the House.
The Federation ChamberSecondary House of Representatives forum where bills can be debated before returning to the House. finished its work on the bill and reported it back to the House for the next formal step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
Senate · Amendments considered
Second reading debate
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it. Amendment: 1 Opposition (in part) and 1 Australian Greens agreed to.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Committee of the whole: amendments considered
Detailed Senate review
Senators examined the bill in detail and considered amendments clause by clause. Amendment: 5 Opposition and 1 Australia's Voice agreed to Requests: 4 Opposition and 2 Independent (Senator Pocock) agreed to.
Senate · Bill agreed to, subject to requests
Senate agreed bill subject to requests
The Senate agreed to the bill but asked the House to make changes before the bill could complete passage.
House · Consideration of Senate message
House made Senate requested amendments
The House agreed to make the changes requested by the Senate, which let the bill continue toward final passage.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
House · Consideration of Senate message
House agreed to Senate amendments
The House agreed to the Senate's amendments, so the bill could proceed in the amended form.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Finally passed both Houses
After the final message exchange, both Houses had agreed on the same text of the bill and it was ready for assent.
Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee
Referred; report published
The Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee examined the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 and a related bill, and recommended that the Senate pass the bills without delay. The report focused on the government's aged care reform agenda, including a rights-based framework for older people, and considered issues such as ministerial rule-making powers, automation, the Higher Everyday Living Fee, the delayed Inspector-General review, and privacy and human rights protections.
Referred to Committee (31 July 2025): Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee; Committee report (21 Aug 2025)
Committee report (21 Aug 2025)Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights
Considered in published report
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights considered the bill in Report 4 of 2025 on 27/08/2025. It raised privacy and rights of persons with disability issues, including expanding the definition of ‘guardian’, and sought a ministerial response.
Considered by scrutiny committee (27 Aug 2025): Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights; Report 4 of 2025
Report 4 of 2025Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills
Considered in published report
Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills considered the bill in Scrutiny Digest 4 of 2025 on 27/08/2025. It raised personal rights and liberties, administrative powers, and review of decisions issues, including significant matters in delegated legislation, and sought a ministerial response.
Considered by scrutiny committee (27 Aug 2025): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 4 of 2025
Scrutiny Digest 4 of 2025