Home-care delays and affordability
Older people could remain without urgently needed care because too few home-care places were available, while higher charges could make services unaffordable for some.
This bill became law on Sep 19th, 2025.
Health, care & disability
Older people waiting for home care gain at least 83,000 services in 2025–26.
The government said the bill was needed for a smooth move to the Aged Care Act 2024, the new main law putting older people’s rights at the centre of care. That law and the Support at HomeThe new program for aged care received at home. program, the new system for care received at home, were delayed until 1 November 2025 so providers could prepare. The government also said older Australians were receiving 6.8 million extra care minutes each day, including 2.5 million delivered by registered nurses, and the bill would help fund that care correctly.
After the Royal Commission’s final report in March 2021 exposed a failing aged-care system, the Aged Care Act 2024 was enacted to replace three older Commonwealth laws, but its planned 1 July 2025 start faced transition gaps and intense demand for home-care packages. Introduced by Sam Rae MP, this bill preserved unspent funds and existing protections, added interim support and transition rules, and strengthened oversight; after both Houses passed it on 4 September and assent followed on 19 September, the new Act was scheduled to commence on 1 November 2025.
Leah Blyth (Liberal) said the changes were overdue and the reform process had been rushed and poorly planned. She said more than 87,000 people were waiting for approved home care, some for over 15 months, while about 120,000 awaited assessment. Penny Allman-Payne (Australian Greens) warned that people could face cancellation fees after unavoidable hospital emergencies. She also argued that the minister’s broad temporary power to alter aged-care laws needed stronger scrutiny.
Sam Rae MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voicesA vote decided without recording individual numbers..
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 19 Sept 2025
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
8 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
57 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Older people waiting for home care gain at least 83,000 services in 2025–26. At least 43,000 must be allocated by 30 June 2026.
Older people waiting before the new system starts gain 20,000 extra home-care packages. All available but unreleased packages must also be released.
Older people already receiving funded care can keep unused government home-care funds available under the new system.
Older people and families get a public review of care-quality standards every five years.
Older people comparing residential homes get ratings informed by current and past records of whether providers followed the law.
Older people can receive faster computer-assisted decisions about care levels, priorities, places and what they must pay.
Older people keep existing tax and income-support treatment for aged-care accommodation payments and specified compensation payments.
54A At the end of section 91 (6) In making a determination under subsection (1) for the 2025‑26 financial year, the Minister must ensure that the method makes available: (a) a number of places equal to, or greater than, the guaranteed (tranche 1) number, for allocation to individuals for the service group home support by the end of 31 December 2025; and (b) at least an additional 43,000 places, for allocation to individuals for the service group home support by the end of 30 June 2026. Note: This guarantees at least 83,000 services (whether home care packages or home support places) for reAged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2025
Aged Care Act 1997 1 After subsection 23B‑1(5) (5A) The Secretary must, as soon as practicable after the commencement of this subsection, make such determinations under subsection (1) as are necessary to ensure all home care packages that were available but not released immediately before that commencement under the Australian Government framework known as the National Priority System are released to recipients. Aged Care Act 1997 1 At the end of section 23B‑1 (7) The Secretary must make such determinations under subsection (1) as are necessary to ensure that before the commencement of thAged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2025
(4) If a claim is made under section 251 for person‑centred subsidy for the delivery of a funded aged care service to the individual on a day, the unspent Commonwealth portion is debited (if at all) in accordance with section 251B immediately after the claim is approved under subsection 251(4). 124 At the end of section 226B (4) The provider must return the available balance of the unspent Commonwealth portion for the individual to the Commonwealth: (a) within the period prescribed by the rules after the day the notice of the election is given to the System Governor; and (b) in accordanceAged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2025
24 At the end of section 15 Periodic reviews of operation of Aged Care Quality Standards (4) The System Governor must cause periodic reviews to be conducted of the operation of the Aged Care Quality Standards. (5) The first review must be completed before the end of the period of 5 years starting on the day this Act commences. (6) Each later review must be completed before the end of each subsequent 5 year period. (7) The System Governor must give the Minister a written report of each review as soon as practicable after the review is completed. (8) The System Governor must cause a copy oAged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2025
The protection of personal information and the regulation of its use and disclosure, consistent with both Australian law and international standards, remains a key priority. Under the new act, this information is protected information, and the act provides substantial penalties for misuse. Amendments in this bill ensure this information is clearly transitioned from the old framework to the new framework with no confusion as to when and how authorisations to use or disclose this information for a proper purpose apply. Amendments are also being made to the Star Ratings program. The introductioSecond reading speech
Miscellaneous changes The new act provided for automated processes to support decisions about classification levels, prioritisation and allocation of places to individuals. Updated automation provisions are included in this bill which reflect best practice for transparency and clarity. The updated provisions will support means-testing arrangements under the new framework for financial contributions. This will allow the system to remain efficient and keep pace with technological advances and ensure that older Australians get quicker and more robust decisions. The protection of personal inforSecond reading speech
Consequential amendments The Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 will make consequential changes to legislation that reference the Commonwealth aged-care system. These amendments will ensure that funded aged-care services are provided in a manner consistent with other Commonwealth legislation. Amendments will ensure that existing exemptions to the application of the GST remain in place for aged-care services. Amendments to the treatment of means testing and income support payments will ensure they continue to operate as intended—specifically, that aged-care accommodation paymeSecond reading speech
Context
After the Royal Commission’s final report in March 2021 exposed a failing aged-care system, the Aged Care Act 2024 was enacted to replace three older Commonwealth laws, but its planned 1 July 2025 start faced transition gaps and intense demand for home-care packages. Introduced by Sam Rae MP, this bill preserved unspent funds and existing protections, added interim support and transition rules, and strengthened oversight; after both Houses passed it on 4 September and assent followed on 19 September, the new Act was scheduled to commence on 1 November 2025.
Royal Commission report exposes aged-care failures
Its final report shocked Australians with a damning assessment of a failing system and recommended a new Act placing older people’s rights at the centre of care.
Hansard ↗Aged Care Act 2024 replaces three older laws
The Act was designed to replace the Aged Care Act 1997, Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission Act 2018, and Aged Care (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997 as the Commonwealth’s primary aged-care laws.
Australian Parliament House ↗The planned 1 July start runs into transition gaps and long waits
Speeches said implementation was delayed because government systems and transitional provisions were not ready, while 5,000 approved older Australians had reportedly died waiting for home-care packages and about 120,000 more awaited assessment.
Hansard ↗Sam Rae MP introduces the bill
He said it would make technical and transitional changes needed to support the new Act, including preserving funds and providing interim support during high-demand periods.
Hansard ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both Houses passed it in the same form after amendments and requests were resolved, clearing the way for Royal AssentFormal approval that turns a bill into law..
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal AssentFormal approval that turns a bill into law. makes the bill law
The Governor-General’s assent turned the bill into an Act, completing the legal step needed before the new aged-care system’s planned 1 November 2025 commencement.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step. For this bill, the Federation Chamber reported back later the same day and the House then completed its remaining formal steps that day.
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Second reading debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step. The official House record shows the referral out and return both happened on the same day, before the House moved to its final formal votes.
Reported from Federation Chamber
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber. Later message exchanges with the other chamber were still recorded afterwards.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Referred to Committee (31/07/2025): Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee; Committee report (21/08/2025)
Report tabled 21 Aug 2025
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Considered by scrutiny committee (27/08/2025): Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights; Report 4 of 2025
Report 4 of 2025
APH bill page notesConsidered by scrutiny committee (27/08/2025): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 4 of 2025
Scrutiny Digest 4 of 2025
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Second reading debate :
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Committee of the Whole debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Consideration of Senate message
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Consideration of Senate message
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentFormal approval that turns a bill into law., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
Leah Blyth (Liberal) said the changes were overdue and the reform process had been rushed and poorly planned. She said more than 87,000 people were waiting for approved home care, some for over 15 months, while about 120,000 awaited assessment. Penny Allman-Payne (Australian Greens) warned that people could face cancellation fees after unavoidable hospital emergencies. She also argued that the minister’s broad temporary power to alter aged-care laws needed stronger scrutiny.
Blyth said the Coalition would not block the bill because it was necessary. Allman-Payne said the Greens welcomed several technical changes, including removing possible caps on cleaning and gardening services.
Home-care delays and affordability
Older people could remain without urgently needed care because too few home-care places were available, while higher charges could make services unaffordable for some.
Rule-making and automated decisions
Broad powers to set transition details through rules, combined with greater automation, could reduce parliamentary scrutiny and expose older people to poorly explained or insufficiently reviewed decisions.
Provider readiness in regional areas
Workforce shortages, travel costs and extensive last-minute changes could make implementation harder for already stretched regional and community-run providers, limiting access to services outside major cities.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voicesA vote decided without recording individual numbers., so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voicesA vote decided without recording individual numbers., so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.
Senate
Defeated 26 to 32. Support came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens.
The Senate rejected the statement, so it was not added to the second-reading motion.
Did not vote: Liberal Party
Passed 33 to 22. Support came from Liberal, Greens, One Nation, Nationals, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor.
The Senate agreed to this criticism, adding it to the second-reading motion.
Did not vote: Liberal Party
Defeated 23 to 33. Support came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and Australia's Voice. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents.
The Senate rejected the proposed condemnation, so it was not added to the second-reading motion.
Did not vote: Liberal Party
Defeated 12 to 29. Support came from Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, and UAP.
The Senate rejected the statement, so the call was not added to the second-reading motion.
Did not vote: Liberal Party
Defeated 16 to 26. Support came from Greens, One Nation, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, and Jacqui Lambie Network.
The Senate rejected the proposal, leaving those exclusions out of the bill.
Did not vote: Liberal Party
Passed 35 to 21. Support came from Liberal, Greens, One Nation, Nationals, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor.
The Senate agreed to the change, shortening the period for those modification powers.
Did not vote: Liberal Party
Passed 35 to 20. Support came from Liberal, Greens, One Nation, Nationals, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor.
The Senate agreed to the proposal, adding the release requirement to the bill's requested changes.
Did not vote: Liberal Party
Defeated 14 to 30. Support came from Greens, Australia's Voice, Jacqui Lambie Network, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, and Nationals.
The Senate rejected the proposal, leaving these specific compensation exclusions out of the bill.
Did not vote: Liberal Party
The Senate backed a call to release more packages urgently and work towards universal, needs-based aged care.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The Senate backed a call to ensure disabled people under 65 do not remain in residential aged care.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The amendment allowing a Senate committee to review temporary rules was carried without recorded counts.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The Senate carried the Greens proposal to retain written agreements for higher everyday-living services.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The Senate rejected proposed protections for cancellations caused by hospital admission or emergencies.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The Senate agreed without recorded counts to call for more packages and universal, needs-based aged care.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The Senate agreed without recorded counts to require 20,000 extra packages before the new aged-care law commenced.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The Senate agreed without recorded counts to release all packages that were available but had not been released.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The Senate rejected proposed offences and penalties where serious duty failures caused harm, illness or death.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The Senate rejected broader protection for reports to journalists, parliamentarians, unions, advocates and professional advisers.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The Senate agreed without recorded counts to let a committee review rules within three months of their tabling.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.
The parliamentary record also shows 4 Opposition requests and 2 Independent requests agreed without a counted division.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Rae urges parliament to support the bill, arguing its technical, transitional and consequential amendments will help the new rights-based aged-care framework operate effectively from November 2025.
Read in Hansard ↗Ruston says the coalition will support the bill because it is essential to implement the new aged-care system and protect existing recipients from being worse off, while criticising the government’s delays, lack of readiness and growing home-care waitlists.
Read in Hansard ↗Sharkie supports the bill's technical changes to implement the new aged-care system, but criticises its broad rule-making power and automation risks and argues the government is failing older Australians through delayed home-care packages, long waits and rising care costs.
Read in Hansard ↗Barnaby Joyce supports the bill's accommodation payment security levy as a way to protect vulnerable aged-care residents, while urging the government to tailor aged-care rules and costs to the needs of community-run regional facilities.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
6 speakers · 6 support
“As a former shadow assistant minister for aged care, I understand how important it is that we get this generational reform right because it will serve Australians for years to come. As Minister Rae has stated, this is why the Albanese Labor government chose to defer the start of the Aged Care Act 2024 and the new Support at Home care package—because we must provide more time for aged-care providers to prepare their clients, support their workforce and get the systems ready for this significant reform. Therefore, this bill will provide further support for the Albanese Labor government's ambition to transform the experience of older Australians receiving care, wherever they reside across the country.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We know that the need is urgent, and it's not acceptable to have older Australians dying at home, as we heard last week, while waiting for a care package. We know that. It is not acceptable. It reflects how broken this system is and why it is so urgent that this parliament and the Senate pass the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025. We are completely overhauling this system. At the heart of it is the wishes of older Australians. It is a generational reform that we will reap the benefits of for years to come.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I hope the Parliament will come together to support this Bill, to help realise the full potential of these critical aged care reforms.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills are required to make the necessary amendments to the existing legislation and to support the commencement of the Aged Care Act. It actually passed both houses in 2024, but the commencement and the release of those home-care packages will be on 1 November this year. There are many, many technical amendments. I notice that I'm running short on time here, so I won't address all of them. But why this matters is that it enables an effective rollout of the rights based aged-care system that was recommended by the royal commission and includes the Support at Home program. It protects the rights and entitlements of existing care recipients through transitional provisions. It clarifies incorrect definitions, procedural mechanisms and regulatory powers critical to the Aged Care 2024 Act so that it functions as was intended. It ensures governments can respond flexibly and quickly to implementation issues, particularly via the temporary rulemaking powers. I know that that has seen some contention in the inquiry into these bills that was held but also in this place and there has been some politicking about that. None of that is without scrutiny and accountability. It can still be scrutinised and held to account around the decision-making.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I hope the parliament will come together to support this bill, to help realise the full potential of these critical aged-care reforms.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills ensure the new rights based system starts well on 1 November. They protect people during transition, strengthen accountability and keep the focus on quality. This is another practical step in putting the care back into aged care and in giving families the confidence that the system will be there for them when they need it. I commend the bills to the Senate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
9 speakers · 11 contributions · 9 support
“The coalition remains absolutely committed to an aged-care system that provides dignity, choice and control to Australians. As this legislation is essential for the delivery of the Aged Care Act, the coalition will not seek to delay the passage of this bill, because without the passage of this bill the Aged Care Rules can not be registered, and we know how essential the final release of supported legislation is to ensuring a smooth transition. That is why this bill must be passed without delay to ensure older Australians can finally receive the care this government has promised them and has failed to deliver.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Aged care is very important. Every person goes through that time in their life, if they're lucky, when they have to consider the welfare of their parents or of people that they've grown to love and consider how they will look after them when they are vulnerable and unable to look after themselves. This is where aged care is so vitally important. Going into aged care is very similar to going to boarding school. You're going to an area that is different; it is not your home. The very disconcerting thing is that it's a boarding school you're never going to leave. This is a time of fear in people's lives, and we have a role to make sure that we placate that fear and that we provide these people with the greatest dignity we can possibly afford them. This is why this accommodation payment security levy is part and parcel with providing that security.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We won't seek to delay the passage of this bill—Australians deserve better than broken promises and more procrastination and delay by this Albanese Labor government; I understand that—but these changes have to be scrutinised to ensure the process of reform can be implemented in the best way possible, because, at the end of the day, our society is ageing, and we need to provide the very best quality of care. But, for want of a better word, there also needs to be the quantity of care, and, in regional Australia at the moment, it's tough. It's tough for these providers to make ends meet. They do a grand job. I take my hat off to them. And people, like those who are running the centre at Gundagai, are doing it really tough.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to speak on the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025. I do so in the interests of ensuring that our senior Australians receive the best care, which they deserve. Importantly, this means making the rollout of aged-care support as seamless and timely as possible. The coalition and I support the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, subject to our amendments. This bill is integral to delivering the Aged Care Act 2024 and, hence, essential to delivering the recommendations of the aged care royal commission instituted under the former coalition government.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition does not seek to delay the passage of these bills, but we will move amendments to ensure sector readiness, transparency and fairness. I also foreshadow a second reading amendment which has been circulated in the chamber in my name. We urge the government to immediately publish the Support at Home release plan and the final manual, and to register the aged-care rules upon royal assent. Older Australians deserve better, providers deserve clarity, and parliament deserves accountability.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Again, the coalition supports the need for this legislation to deliver on the important changes we fought hard for, for the benefit of hardworking Australians. But we remain extremely disappointed by this government's refusal to listen to aged-care providers and its complete neglect of older Australians who need support to stay in their own homes. That is why we'll be seeking to refer both the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 and the Aged Care (Accommodation Payment Security) Levy Amendment Bill 2025 for Senate inquiries to ensure adequate consultation for the benefit of older Australians who rely on the aged-care sector. The coalition strongly supports all older Australians having access to the care they need and deserve.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Kerrynne Liddle on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Liddle says the coalition supports the bill because it is needed to prevent further disruption in aged care, while arguing that the legislation exposes the government's poor preparation and broken promises, particularly on home-care packages.
“How many South Australian lives have ended while they waited for Labor to get their act together? What about Indigenous Australians who need this care? We know they don't take up packages at the same rate as others. How many of them are being left stranded? We probably will never know. The coalition supports the passage of the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 because it is necessary to prevent further chaos in the aged-care sector. But, make no mistake, this legislation is proof of this government's failure. It proves Labor was not ready. It proves Labor misled Australians. And it proves Labor's refusal to accept coalition amendments during the debate on the Aged Care Act was nothing more than putting politics before people.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Liddle says the coalition supports the bill because it is essential to delivering aged-care reforms, but argues it is needed only because the government mishandled the original legislation and was unprepared for implementation.
“Yet again, I rise in this place to support bills that have only come about through Labor mismanagement and delays. I rise to contribute to the debate on the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 and the associated bill. The main bill is essential to the delivery of aged care, the Aged Care Act 2024 and ultimately the implementation of recommendations from the aged-care royal commission, an inquiry instituted under the former coalition government. The coalition supports this legislation. Our support, however, comes with the recognition that it is yet another example of the Albanese government playing catch-up, fixing their own mistakes and trying to cover up their own lack of preparedness.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“This is a crisis of the government's own making. We are proud to have forced this government into providing an additional 83,000 packages this financial year, but there is still more work to be done, and the coalition will continue to fight for older Australians with one clear goal: no-one should have to wait for the care they have been assessed as needing.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Leah Blyth on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Blyth says the coalition will support the bill because the aged-care reforms are necessary and overdue, but criticises the government for a rushed and poorly planned implementation that has left vulnerable older Australians waiting for care.
“The coalition will not stand in the way of the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 and the related bill moving through and being approved, because it is necessary and it is overdue. It is essential to delivering the Aged Care Act 2024 and implementing the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, which was instituted under the former coalition government. The coalition supports aged care reform. We support a system that delivers dignity, safety and quality care to older Australians. What we do not support is a reform process that is rushed and poorly planned and leaves vulnerable Australians behind.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Blyth says the coalition will support the bill with amendments because it is necessary for the aged-care reforms to proceed and protects existing recipients, while criticising the government for delays, poor preparation and growing home-care waitlists.
“Aged-care reform is not just about legislation; it is about people. It is about the grandmother who needs help to stay in her home, the veteran who deserves respect in his final years and the carer who is stretched to breaking point. This government has failed to deliver on its promises. The delay in home-care packages is a national crisis. The waitlist has tripled under Labor's watch. Minister Rae must urgently deliver the promised 83,000 packages and provide certainty to providers planning for workforce demands. The coalition supports this bill with amendments. We will continue to hold the government accountable, demand transparency and advocate for those who have been left behind. Older Australians deserve better than another broken promise, and we will not support a process that puts politics before people.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
4 speakers · 2 support · 2 unclear
“There are so many issues present in these bills—bills that will affect the lives of millions of Australians. The Greens once again urge the government to work in good faith with older people and their advocates to address these issues. I foreshadow a second reading amendment in my name and a second reading amendment in the name of Senator Allman-Payne.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Older people are not commodities. They must be treated with respect, dignity and care. The Greens welcome small changes and technical improvements, but we do not expect the reforms made by this government to prevent or even meaningfully delay the onset of a state of rolling crisis in Australia's aged-care system. As aged-care expert Professor Kathy Eagar AM stated in her submission to the aged-care bill 2024 inquiry:”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“yes—to bring forward 20,000 new home-care packages. Amendments passed by the Senate have forced the government to urgently negotiate and bring forward that release of 20,000 home-care packages and front-load the release of the Support at Home program from 1 November. The Greens have for a long time been pushing the government hard to take action, chairing a Senate inquiry into the issue and putting forward amendments to the government's aged-care legislation. My Greens colleague Senator Penny Allman-Payne has worked very hard at this, and it is a credit to the work of her, to Senator David Pocock and to Senator Ruston that this reform has been achieved. This will begin the work of addressing the urgent needs of over 200,000 older Australians waiting 12 months or more for basic care like showering, cooking and cleaning. But there are still over 200,000 people on the waiting list for Support at Home, and this win will barely touch the sides. We're still seeing care rationed and older people treated, sadly, like commodities.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“(ii) while the Government accepted this recommendation, this bill retains in the Aged Care Act 2024 a formalised pathway to place people under 65 in aged care, and”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
5 speakers · 5 support
“In conclusion, while I support this bill, and despite a royal commission, there are still many failings in how we deliver aged care in our nation. Overall, we need to do much, much better by our older Australians.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I join my colleagues in the Senate in saying that I won't be delaying the bill. I'm glad we finally got to it. This clearly needs to pass for Support at Home to commence in November, but the Senate does have a right to make really sensible amendments. I foreshadow that I'll be moving an amendment that would see the release of 20,000 new home-care packages. We all know it can be done. The department has said as much. We know that they can be provided. Providers have said publicly that they have capacity, and we know that there is need. This is urgent. This is the opportunity for the government to change the lives of 20,000 older Australians and, in most cases, change the lives of their families. I urge the government: this is an opportunity to do the right thing, to do the thing that the evidence suggests we need to do leading up to 1 November and to do the thing that is in the best interests of older Australians. You'll have an opportunity when other senators and I move amendments to the main bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I support this bill, but I take this opportunity to highlight serious deficiencies in the current home-care system, which my constituents are so very much relying on, before the new Aged Care Act and support-at-home system commences. Home-care packages make a life-changing difference for people across in my electorate in north-east Victoria. For older Australians, getting help with basics like cleaning and gardening preserves their ability to stay in their home for longer. For their families, it provides the peace of mind that their loved ones are getting the care and support they need when they need it. But, while the benefits of these packages are clear, the reality of getting an assessment leaves too many older people languishing on waitlists; we've just heard graphic descriptions of this from the member for Mayo.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I recognise that the government has been trying to make home aged care and care for older Australians more sustainable. That is a good thing. That is a very positive thing. But home care is really critical to that. Home care is both a good economic choice—if we can keep people out of aged care, it is better in terms of the cost—and, most importantly, a good choice for people's families and for people's own mental health. It is what they want. Both bringing the additional 20,000 packages and bringing forward those packages earlier in the year are really critical when we are seeing such a growth of people on the waiting list desperately needing help and not being able to get it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I also rise to support the release of these 20,000 home-care packages. I believe it is an important step forward for the parliament and also for the nation. Most people in our communities know how important home care is to our seniors and the difference that it makes to people's lives. I think everyone was shocked that these packages were being withheld. The feedback from the Calare electorate, in the Central West of New South Wales, is that the packages need to be released on the double and that we need to get help to our seniors to help with their amenity of life and the support that they need.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Reported from Federation Chamber
Reported from Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Amendments considered
Amendment packages agreed
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Committee of the whole: amendments considered
Amendment packages agreed
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Senate · Bill agreed to, subject to requests
Bill agreed to, subject to requests
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Consideration of Senate message
House made Senate requested amendments
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
House · Consideration of Senate message
House agreed to Senate amendments
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentFormal approval that turns a bill into law., turning the bill into an Act.
Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee
Report tabled 21 Aug 2025
Referred to Committee (31 July 2025): Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee; Committee report (21 Aug 2025)
APH bill page notesParliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights
Report 4 of 2025
Considered by scrutiny committee (27 Aug 2025): Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights; Report 4 of 2025
APH bill page notesSenate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills
Scrutiny Digest 4 of 2025
Considered by scrutiny committee (27 Aug 2025): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 4 of 2025
APH bill page notes