Short-term fix that misses bigger shortages
Critics said the bill funds a temporary pay rise but does not solve childcare deserts, lack of places, or the longer-term question of how higher wages will be sustained after the grant scheme ends.
This bill became law on Dec 10th, 2024.
Work & employment
Australia sets up a dedicated fund so the government can pay grants that support higher wages for early childhood education and careThe sector this bill is aimed at: child care and preschool services, and the workers who staff them. workers.
Significant and persistent early childhood education and careThe sector this bill is aimed at: child care and preschool services, and the workers who staff them. workforce shortages, driven by workers not being fairly paid, left universal child care goals at risk. The bill creates a temporary special accountA dedicated government funding pool set up for a specific purpose, here to pay grants for wage rises. to fund grants for worker pay rises and requires providers taking the money to limit fee increases.
Australia already had a child care system the government said was meant to become more universal, but persistent workforce shortages and low pay in early childhood education and careThe sector this bill is aimed at: child care and preschool services, and the workers who staff them. were making it harder to attract and keep staff while keeping services affordable for families. After announcing a retention payment plan in August 2024, the government used this bill to create a temporary fund for 15 per cent wage rises tied to limits on fee increases, with grants starting in December 2024 and existing agreements rolling into the new scheme from July 2025.
The main criticism was that the bill is a short-term wage subsidy that may add provider costs, administrative burden and fee pressure without fixing deeper shortages in child care places, especially in regional areas. These concerns were raised mainly by Coalition speakers and some crossbench supporters, while broader parliamentary support for higher wages remained conditional on longer-term reform and workable safeguards.
Hon Jason Clare MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 10 Dec 2024
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
6 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
89 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Australia sets up a dedicated fund so the government can pay grants that support higher wages for early childhood education and careThe sector this bill is aimed at: child care and preschool services, and the workers who staff them. workers.
Approved child care providers can apply for CommonwealthThe Australian national government, which is the body paying the grants and running the scheme. grants for workers' pay rises, including grants paid by reimbursing some or all wage-related costs.
Providers that take the funding must accept grant terms that limit how much they can raise child care fees.
Grant deals already made under the earlier child care funding law will automatically continue under this Act from 1 July 2025.
This wage-support law is temporary and stops operating at the end of 30 June 2028.
This Act establishes the Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers Special Account to support remuneration increases for workers in the early childhood education and care sector.Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) Act 2024 final Act text
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), a grant under that subsection may be made by way of the reimbursement, or partial reimbursement, of costs or expenses.Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) Act 2024 final Act text
(b) include provisions to limit any increase in fees that may be charged by the recipient for providing early childhood education and care; andWage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) Act 2024 final Act text
(2) The written agreement has effect, on and after 1 July 2025, as if it were a written agreement entered into for the purposes of section 11 of this Act for a grant under section 10 of this Act.Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) Act 2024 final Act text
This Act ceases to have effect at the end of 30 June 2028.Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) Act 2024 final Act text
Context
Australia already had a child care system the government said was meant to become more universal, but persistent workforce shortages and low pay in early childhood education and careThe sector this bill is aimed at: child care and preschool services, and the workers who staff them. were making it harder to attract and keep staff while keeping services affordable for families. After announcing a retention payment plan in August 2024, the government used this bill to create a temporary fund for 15 per cent wage rises tied to limits on fee increases, with grants starting in December 2024 and existing agreements rolling into the new scheme from July 2025.
Government announces a wage rise plan for early childhood educators
The government said it would fund higher pay to help attract and retain early childhood workers while keeping care accessible and affordable for families.
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) explanatory memorandum ↗Bill introduced to set up the wage justice special accountA dedicated government funding pool set up for a specific purpose, here to pay grants for wage rises.
The bill was introduced to create a dedicated CommonwealthThe Australian national government, which is the body paying the grants and running the scheme. funding mechanism for grants that support pay rises for eligible early childhood education and careThe sector this bill is aimed at: child care and preschool services, and the workers who staff them. workers.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both houses passed the bill, clearing the way for the new special accountA dedicated government funding pool set up for a specific purpose, here to pay grants for wage rises. to back the worker retention payment program in law.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal AssentThe formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament. turns the bill into law
Royal AssentThe formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament. completed the legislation so the special accountA dedicated government funding pool set up for a specific purpose, here to pay grants for wage rises. could operate as the legal basis for later grant arrangements under the Act.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Wage grant funding begins under the existing child care law
The explanatory memorandum says grants would start under the Family Assistance ActThe earlier child care funding law the government used to start paying grants before this new Act took over. first so providers could receive funding before the new payment system was ready.
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) explanatory memorandum ↗Existing wage grant agreements move onto the new Act
Grant agreements already made for the program before this date continue as if they had been made under the new legislation.
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) explanatory memorandum ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Referred to Committee (19/09/2024): Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (30/10/2024)
Referred to committee
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
The main criticism was that the bill is a short-term wage subsidy that may add provider costs, administrative burden and fee pressure without fixing deeper shortages in child care places, especially in regional areas. These concerns were raised mainly by Coalition speakers and some crossbench supporters, while broader parliamentary support for higher wages remained conditional on longer-term reform and workable safeguards.
Most criticism targeted the bill's limits and implementation, not the goal of paying educators more fairly.
Short-term fix that misses bigger shortages
Critics said the bill funds a temporary pay rise but does not solve childcare deserts, lack of places, or the longer-term question of how higher wages will be sustained after the grant scheme ends.
Risk of higher costs and red tape
Opponents argued the scheme could increase providers' compliance costs and administrative pressure, and that some of those costs could still flow through to families despite fee limits.
Too much ministerial discretion and unclear settings
Some supporters said the bill leaves too much to grant conditions and later decisions, with not enough certainty about long-term funding, fee controls, or how smaller providers will cope.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.
House
Defeated 57 to 84. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and Centre Alliance. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The amendment failed, and the bill still proceeded through the House later that day.
Senate
Defeated 24 to 31. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, UAP, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents.
Because the amendment failed, the bill proceeded without the Senate recording those criticisms in the second-reading motion.
Defeated 11 to 33. Support came from Greens. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, Nationals, UAP, and minor parties and independents. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The bill kept moving without that second-reading call for a broader childcare system and longer-term wage support.
Defeated 12 to 33. Support came from Greens and Australia's Voice. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, Nationals, UAP, and minor parties and independents. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The bill passed its second-reading stage without that broader call to shift control and funding toward Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community-controlled organisations.
Defeated 13 to 23. Support came from Greens and Australia's Voice. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, and minor parties and independents. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The bill kept the lower grant settings instead of locking in the larger wage increase sought by the Greens.
Defeated 13 to 23. Support came from Greens and Australia's Voice. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, and minor parties and independents. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The law was left without the proposed automatic expiry tied to awardA legal pay-setting instrument for a job class; here the Children’s Services Award is one of the key pay benchmarks being reviewed. determinations and review timing.
Senator Thorpe's proposal was defeated on voices. It would have broadened who could be treated as an approved providerA child care provider that is officially allowed under the family assistance laws to receive this funding., allowed grants to be paid upfront, and required the rules to set grant assessment criteria.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Clare supports the bill and urges the House to pass it, saying it will deliver a 15 per cent pay rise for early childhood educators, help retain and recruit workers, and limit fee increases for families.
Read in Hansard ↗Watson-Brown says the Greens welcome the recognition of early childhood educators, but the bill is only a short-term and inadequate fix that still leaves workers underpaid and families facing higher fees.
Read in Hansard ↗Bell says the coalition will support the bill because it delivers a pay rise for early childhood educators, but she argues it is an expensive pre-election measure that adds inflationary and administrative pressure without creating any new places for families.
Read in Hansard ↗Haines supports the bill and wants the wage rise for early childhood educators to pass, but says it is only a temporary fix and not the long-term solution the sector needs.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
18 speakers · 20 contributions · 18 support
“We think our early educators have one of the most important jobs imaginable, which is to educate our young people. We think it's absolutely critical. They deserve much more than our thanks. Those opposite can barely give them thanks. They deserve our respect, and they deserve to be paid properly and justly. That's what this legislation, the Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) Bill 2024, is about. The bill is about making sure those educators are fairly paid, and it delivers on our announcement on 8 August to deliver a wage increase to early childhood and care educators. It's about addressing workforce shortages. That's why they had workforce shortages—because people weren't being paid properly. We're increasing their wages to get people into the sector and to incentivise them.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I encourage all of those present to vote for this bill. I would again like to acknowledge the extraordinary work of the many educators and teachers in my electorate who each and every day give our children the great opportunity of early childhood education and the care that they require.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Productivity Commission's final report confirms what the Albanese government already knew: that prioritising the early learning workforce is critical to any reform. That's why this bill is so important. The wage justice bill supports this historic 15 per cent wage increase for our early childhood education workers. It ensures that funding gets passed on to workers in full. It requires early childhood education and care services to agree to limit the increases they make in the fees they charge families, so it will help strengthen the early learning workforce without passing these costs on to families.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I would like to thank the United Workers Union for their fierce advocacy for early childhood education and care workers through their Big Steps campaign to help secure this pay rise, and I would also like to thank all the early childhood education and care workers, especially those in the Illawarra, for everything that they do. You deserve this pay rise, and I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“If human rights are forgotten when it comes to women and children, we don't really understand human rights at all, and this bill does. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I look forward to visiting, once I return to my electorate, more centres. I know I will be opening an early childhood education centre very soon. There's a lot of growth in this sector in my electorate. But for the moment I'm very pleased to stand here as part of a government that is delivering wage justice for early childhood education and care workers—wage justice that is much deserved.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I fully support the Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) Bill 2024 because I've seen firsthand the contributions they have made, and continue to make, to our society. I saw that as a mother when I dropped my children, when they were toddlers, off to early education so that I could be part of our economy and our education system and make my contribution to this society. This legislation will help address significant workforce shortages that we're also seeing, because it supports the delivery of a much-needed wage increase of 15 per cent for eligible workers across two years. It's a wage increase that is long overdue for some of our hardest workers in this heavily feminised workforce, a wage increase that was needed but ignored by those opposite for such a long time.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) Bill before the House today will help address significant workforce shortages in early childhood education by supporting the delivery of a wage increase of 15 per cent for eligible workers over two years. A typical early childhood educator on award wages will receive an additional $103 a week from December 2024, increasing to at least $155 from December 2025. A typical early childhood teacher on award wages will receive an additional $166 a week from December 2024, increasing to at least $249 a week from December 2025. These are very significant pay increases.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“By supporting this bill we are not only doing what is right for early childhood educators but also investing in the future of our children and the future of our nation. I urge all members of this House to support this important piece of legislation. Let us stand together for wage justice, for gender equity and for the future of early childhood education in this country.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Steve Georganas on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Steve Georganas supports the bill and says it will deliver fair pay rises for early childhood workers, help retain staff, and improve affordability and quality in the sector. He argues the measure is necessary because educators are badly underpaid and the workforce is hard to sustain.
“I'm proud to stand up here and support this bill, the Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) Bill 2024. It is a very special bill. It's a bill that will enable early childhood education and care workers, who are some of the most important workers in the country, to be paid fairly and enable a betterment in our economy.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Georganas supports the bill, saying it is needed to professionalise and sustain the early childhood workforce after years of neglect and to deliver proper pay for a historically undervalued sector. He argues it will help make early childhood education and careThe sector this bill is aimed at: child care and preschool services, and the workers who staff them. more accessible and affordable for families.
“This bill demonstrates the government's absolute commitment to supporting wage increases in a historically undervalued, mainly female dominated care sector, and it complements recent workplace relations reforms through the secure jobs, better pay act. We know that early childhood educators do a very important job. They are some of the most important workers in our country. We entrust them with our children when they leave home for the first time and we entrust them with their care and education. We know that they deserve more than our thanks; they deserve to be paid properly.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“I urge everyone in this chamber to support this bill and to celebrate the work of our early childhood educators. Together we can build a better future for our children—one where every educator feels valued and every family has access to the quality of care and education they deserve. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So, to make this pay rise a reality, this bill sets up the Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers Special Account. This account will allow the Albanese government to deliver a 15 per cent pay rise over two years through the ECEC Worker Retention Payment Program.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I am very proud to join with every member of the government in commending this bill to the House. I thank the minister, the member for Cowan, very much for her work, ably supported here by the education minister. Both of them are so passionate about opportunity and how education is the key to creating that opportunity for all, which is about creating an opportunity for Australia to seize to be the best country that we can be in the future. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The bill before the parliament is about the workers who support these incredible young Australians to get off to the very best start. I'm sure I'm not alone here, but one of the most absolutely fantastic things that we get to do in our work as members of parliament is visit childcare centres where these young Aussies are getting taught by these incredible people, who are spending every day going to work and helping children form their first words and helping them learn through active participation. I'm so lucky to see my three children have had that opportunity. These workers are as good as gold, but for too long the Australian people and the Australian government have not been giving them the rewards that they deserve. We know that they are doing essential work to help build a great future for our country, yet they are being remunerated as though that work were not important, and that's not good enough.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I commend this bill to the House. I look forward to its implementation. I congratulate the minister, and I congratulate all those early childhood intervention teachers that have been involved in getting this bill through the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Jason Clare on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Minister's second reading speech
Clare supports the bill and urges the House to pass it, saying it will deliver a 15 per cent pay rise for early childhood educators, help retain and recruit workers, and limit fee increases for families. He presents it as part of building a bigger, fairer early education system and says he commends it to the House.
“You deserve wage justice. You deserve this pay rise and you deserve this bill.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Jason Clare strongly supports the bill and says it will deliver a 15 per cent pay rise to up to 200,000 early childhood educators, because they are essential but badly underpaid. He argues the higher pay will help retain workers and bring more people into the sector, and he commends the bill to the House.
“This bill is about addressing that. It'll deliver a 15 per cent pay rise for up to 200,000 early educators across the country. That's a 10 per cent rise in just a few weeks time on 1 December and then a further five per cent rise from December of next year.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“This bill builds on the government's support for the ECEC sector and Australian families, including the cheaper childcare measures, which injected $5 billion into the sector in our first budget. This in turn has made child care cheaper for more than a million families. Our children and parents, especially our mums, and our economy will be the beneficiaries, but it all starts with the workforce. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These workers very much deserve our support. The work they do is incredibly important to families, to our economy and of course, most of all, to the kids they care for and educate in their earliest years. On that basis I commend the bill to the chamber.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
8 speakers · 9 contributions · 7 support · 1 oppose
“The coalition has many concerns, however, with this policy. There's the impact on inflation, the administrative and financial burdens placed on small and medium businesses and the fact that this policy comes with a $3.6 billion price tag and delivers not one additional place for families, remembering that it is a taxpayer funded pay rise for the sector. But we won't stand in the way of a pay rise for early childhood educators, and so the coalition will support this legislation today.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I would note that the coalition and every member of this place—obviously the government and those on the crossbench as well—would recognise that our early childhood teachers and educators work extremely hard. We won't be standing in the way of a wage rise for those people but we still have some concerns about this bill and the policy going forward.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It's difficult to make any argument against better wages for childcare workers, and I certainly don't intend to. This side of the House will be supporting these increases.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I mentioned that I will also be moving a second reading amendment. I want to just outline what that second reading amendment is. While we are not declining to give the bill a second reading, we are asking the Senate to note and endorse that the government's economic mismanagement and cost-of-living crisis has led to higher wage bills and higher utility, rent and grocery bills for childhood education providers. The bill will place further administrative burden on providers, particularly small and medium providers. The government's decision to include a workplace instrument in this bill is unnecessary and puts pressure on service providers to unionise their workforce.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“That is why this bill really needs to be far, far more holistic in its approach. We know and understand our early childhood educators deserve a pay increase, but we also know that there has to be a way to do that which doesn't lead to inflation going higher or those costs going higher or out-of-pocket costs for parents continuing to rise year on year as they have for the last 12 months by 8.4 per cent.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Tony Pasin on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Pasin says the coalition welcomes the pay rise for early childhood educators and childcare workers, but argues the bill is only temporary funding that stops in November 2026 and does not fix the deeper childcare shortage problem. He supports the measure, while criticising the government for not dealing with childcare deserts and what happens after the funding ends.
“But I want to say that of course the coalition understands the importance of early childhood educators and of childcare workers, so this increase in their take-home pay is welcomed. However, this funding is slated to cease on 30 November 2026.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Pasin says the coalition will not stand in the way of the wage rise, but argues the bill is a short-term pre-election sugar hit because it ends in 2026 and relies on a workplace instrument he says is meant to appease unions. He supports better pay for early childhood workers, but wants longer-term, more serious policy and stronger answers on childcare access.
“That is why the coalition certainly doesn't stand in the way of a wage rise for early childhood educators and teachers. But of course we do have some very real concerns.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“The bill, which is supported by us, legislates a special account known as the Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers Special Account to support a government funded 15 per cent pay increase for childcare workers across Australia.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill is a political posturing move from the Albanese government, and I note there is a concurrent Senate inquiry process—even though the bill is before the House—scheduled to conclude by 30 October, in time for the resumption of sittings in November. The shadow minister for early childhood education, who spoke earlier, is coming to my electorate of Mallee to see the childcare desert, which no-one from Labor has bothered to look at. She told the House in August, and it bears repeating now:”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
3 speakers · 4 contributions · 1 support · 1 oppose · 1 mixed
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Steph Hodgins-May, including an amendment-moving contribution. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Hodgins-May says the Greens will support the bill as a step in the right direction, but argues it does not go far enough because the pay rise is too small and only lasts two years. She wants the government to fully fund a 25 per cent increase and guarantee ongoing funding beyond 2028.
“It is absolutely clear that this bill is a step in the right direction, but it simply doesn't go far enough. Labor will not fix our broken system with half-hearted measures. If we want high-quality, universal early-years education and care, we must invest in a sustainable workforce and fully invest in our educators.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Moved amendment
Hodgins-May moves a second reading amendment that would only back the bill if the government commits to universal, free and high-quality early childhood education and careThe sector this bill is aimed at: child care and preschool services, and the workers who staff them., and to funding pay rises beyond the bill's two-year grant period.
“At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate calls on the Government to:”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“The Greens, of course, welcome the government's long overdue recognition of the importance of early childhood educators. This recognition is a critical first step, but there is so much more to do. It's high time our early childhood educators were recognised and received the respect and the pay that they're worth. Educators have been leaving the industry in droves because their wages simply don't match the importance of the work they do. Let that sink in. Educators cannot afford to be educators, and the government's response to this crisis is a short-term fix—15 per cent for two years, if providers decide to apply for it. What happens after that? Will it be the providers or the parents who foot the bill? Or will more educators walk away because they still cannot make ends meet?”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We need to fix all this with a decent pay rise for our childcare workforce—a rise that goes beyond 15 per cent to meet the expectations, evidence and case for a 25 per cent rise. This bill is a step in that direction. But we need a lot more. We need affordable, accessible, quality care for all who need it. Our economic future depends on it, our families are looking for it and, more importantly, the healthy future of our kids depends on it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
5 speakers · 6 contributions · 5 support
“I conclude my remarks by affirming my support for this bill, despite my implementation concerns. It will ensure that early childhood educators and teachers right across Australia will see a wage rise in December. This wage rise—make no mistake—is long overdue, but I am fearful that, at this point, it is only temporary. If this government is serious about fixing workforce shortages in this sector, then it needs to deliver on its commitment to long-term funding solutions, because this bill alone is not enough. It is simply one step among many that we must take if we're to fix our childcare system in Australia.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In closing, there is so much more to be done to ensure early-childhood education and care is valued, affordable, accessible and of a high quality for all Australians. Paying workers what they deserve is an essential first step in this journey. I welcome this bill, and I very much look forward to supporting it as it moves through the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill is an important step in the right direction for wage justice in the early childhood education and care sector, but it's important that we get it right. Don't leave Aboriginal childcare services out. I used to be the cook, when I was 17, at Yappera Children's Services. Don't leave us out. We provide a holistic approach. It is very, very important for our communities. You've done the wrong thing in leaving us out of this, and you should fix that. For this program to be inclusive and supportive to those that need it most, we need to start truly valuing the work of those holding our society together and looking after our future generations. Don't leave anyone else out.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I promised the women of Goldstein I would fight for their economic security, especially for those who are not in the room, and I will continue to do so. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Kate Chaney on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Chaney says she supports the bill because it would help lift pay for early childhood education and careThe sector this bill is aimed at: child care and preschool services, and the workers who staff them. workers, whom she says are underpaid and essential to quality care. She also criticises the bill’s clunky structure and warns about its inflationary impact, lack of dedicated funding, short-term design and discretionary powers.
“I rise to support the Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) Bill 2024, which creates grants for early childhood education and care providers to support a wage increase for their workers. I want to talk about why accessible, quality childcare is important for kids and families, why it's important that we pay childcare workers better, the structure of the bill and some concerns with it, and further reform that is needed.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Chaney supports the bill as a first step toward better pay and more accessible early childhood education and careThe sector this bill is aimed at: child care and preschool services, and the workers who staff them., but says it is too short-term, leaves funding unclear, and gives the government too much discretion. She wants longer-term reform to be revisited after the current reviews and Senate inquiry.
“In conclusion, I support this bill as one step towards quality, accessible and affordable early childhood education and care. Early childhood education and care is important for kids and families. Like workers in many traditionally feminised industries, childcare workers are underpaid. We need to attract a quality workforce to educate and care for our kids, and paying them better is a good start. There are a few issues with this bill that I hope are addressed in the current Senate inquiry. In particular, the bill takes a short-term approach and doesn't allocate money to the special account being established, so it's kicking the can down the road on longer term reform and costs. The broad powers in the grant-making laws leave a lot to the government's discretion. So it's appropriate that the bill be reconsidered in a few years in light of a number of reviews currently underway.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Committee of the Whole debate
Committee of the Whole debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament., turning the bill into an Act.
Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (30/10/2024)
Referred to committee
Referred to Committee (19 Sept 2024): Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (30 Oct 2024)
APH bill page notes