Too small to change affordability
Critics argued the scheme would help only a small number of people and leave the wider housing crisis largely unchanged, making it a weak response to a much bigger affordability problem.
This bill became law on Dec 10th, 2024.
Budget, tax & economy
Housing AustraliaThe Commonwealth body that runs the scheme and enters the co-ownership arrangements with eligible buyers. can co-buy homes with eligible low and middle income people in participating states and territories, so the CommonwealthThe federal government in Canberra, which provides the scheme money and owns the public share in each participating home. covers part of the purchase cost and keeps a stake in the property.
Low- and middle-income earners were left needing help to buyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. new or existing homes. This bill creates Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home., letting Housing AustraliaThe Commonwealth body that runs the scheme and enters the co-ownership arrangements with eligible buyers. co-buy with eligible people using a CommonwealthThe federal government in Canberra, which provides the scheme money and owns the public share in each participating home. equity contribution.
Labor took Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. to the 2022 election as a shared-equity path into home ownership, but the scheme's promised 1 January 2023 start date passed before the legislation was introduced, leaving low- and middle-income earners without the planned assistance. The Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. Bill 2023 responded by setting up a CommonwealthThe federal government in Canberra, which provides the scheme money and owns the public share in each participating home. co-purchase scheme through Housing AustraliaThe Commonwealth body that runs the scheme and enters the co-ownership arrangements with eligible buyers., and after a long parliamentary path it passed in late November 2024 and received Royal AssentThe final formal approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. on 10 December 2024.
The main criticism was that Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. is too small and too vague to fix housing affordability, while exposing buyers to risks in a shared-equity scheme if their circumstances change or rules are unclear. These concerns were raised most strongly by Coalition speakers, while some crossbench support remained conditional because the bill was seen as another demand-side measure that does not solve supply shortages.
Hon Julie Collins MP introduced this bill. It passed with support from Labor, Centre Alliance, some crossbench members; opposed by Liberal Party, Nationals, Greens, some crossbench members.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 10 Dec 2024
Final passage
Recorded final vote
1 counted final-passage vote was recorded.
Passage speed
376 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Housing AustraliaThe Commonwealth body that runs the scheme and enters the co-ownership arrangements with eligible buyers. can co-buy homes with eligible low and middle income people in participating states and territories, so the CommonwealthThe federal government in Canberra, which provides the scheme money and owns the public share in each participating home. covers part of the purchase cost and keeps a stake in the property.
The housing minister can set program rules on who can enter, how many homes are covered, what kinds of homes qualify, and how much CommonwealthThe federal government in Canberra, which provides the scheme money and owns the public share in each participating home. money can go into each purchase.
CommonwealthThe federal government in Canberra, which provides the scheme money and owns the public share in each participating home. money for the program is paid directly to Housing AustraliaThe Commonwealth body that runs the scheme and enters the co-ownership arrangements with eligible buyers., and money that comes back from these home equity deals must be paid back to the CommonwealthThe federal government in Canberra, which provides the scheme money and owns the public share in each participating home..
If a state stops fully participating, no new Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. home purchases can start there, but Housing AustraliaThe Commonwealth body that runs the scheme and enters the co-ownership arrangements with eligible buyers. can keep managing existing deals for people already in the program.
If Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. clashes with a state or territory property or tax law, that local law can override the conflicting part, but the CommonwealthThe federal government in Canberra, which provides the scheme money and owns the public share in each participating home. still keeps its right to recover its equity share and security.
This Act gives Housing Australia the function of entering, on behalf of the Commonwealth, into shared equity arrangements (known as Help to Buy arrangements) with buyers of residential property in participating States and in Territories. It also gives Housing Australia the function of continuing to administer existing Help to Buy arrangements when a State stops being a participating State.Help to Buy Act 2024 final Act text
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Help to Buy Program Directions may include directions about the following matters relating to Help to Buy arrangements:Help to Buy Act 2024 final Act text
Housing Australia must pay to the Commonwealth as soon as reasonably practicable:Help to Buy Act 2024 final Act text
A participating State may choose to become a cooperating State if it does not wish for new participants in that State to be able to purchase a residential property with the assistance of Help to Buy but wants to ensure that existing participants from that State can continue to be supported by the Help to Buy program, which refers to the Act, regulations, Program Directions and any other legislative instruments made under the Act. [Section 5 of the Bill]Help to Buy explanatory memorandum
Where there is a direct inconsistency and the relevant State or Territory law prevails, this displacement of all or part of the application of the Help to Buy program does not have any impact on Housing Australia’s entitlement under a Help to Buy arrangement to a return on a contribution made under the Help to Buy arrangement, nor does it have any impact on any security taken by Housing Australia to secure the entitlement (such as by means of a mortgage or other right relating to a residential property). In other words, Housing Australia is entitled to a return on an equity contribution made under a Help to Buy arrangement, and this entitlement will remain recoverable and any security taken will remain preserved despite the inconsistency.Help to Buy explanatory memorandum
Context
Labor took Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. to the 2022 election as a shared-equity path into home ownership, but the scheme's promised 1 January 2023 start date passed before the legislation was introduced, leaving low- and middle-income earners without the planned assistance. The Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. Bill 2023 responded by setting up a CommonwealthThe federal government in Canberra, which provides the scheme money and owns the public share in each participating home. co-purchase scheme through Housing AustraliaThe Commonwealth body that runs the scheme and enters the co-ownership arrangements with eligible buyers., and after a long parliamentary path it passed in late November 2024 and received Royal AssentThe final formal approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. on 10 December 2024.
Labor takes Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. to the federal election
During the bill debate, speakers said Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. had been taken to the 2022 election as a promised shared-equity housing measure.
Hansard ↗Promised Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. start date passes without legislation
Opposition speakers said the scheme had been promised to commence on 1 January 2023, but legislation was still not before Parliament by early 2024.
Hansard ↗Government introduces the Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. bill
The government introduced the bill to let Housing AustraliaThe Commonwealth body that runs the scheme and enters the co-ownership arrangements with eligible buyers. co-buy homes with eligible low- and middle-income Australians using a CommonwealthThe federal government in Canberra, which provides the scheme money and owns the public share in each participating home. equity contribution.
Hansard ↗House passes the bill
The House agreed to the bill at second and third reading, sending the proposed shared-equity scheme on to the Senate.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both houses passed the bill in the same form after the House agreed to Senate amendments, completing its parliamentary passage.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. becomes law
Royal AssentThe final formal approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. turned the bill into an Act, allowing the CommonwealthThe federal government in Canberra, which provides the scheme money and owns the public share in each participating home. shared-equity scheme to be established in law.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration., opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. moved
Referred to Committee (30/11/2023): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (18/04/2024)
Referred to committee
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Recorded vote: 85 to 55.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration., meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. agreed to
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber. Later message exchanges with the other chamber were still recorded afterwards.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration., opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. amendment agreed to
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration., opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration., meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. agreed to
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Committee of the Whole debate
Recorded vote: 36 to 29.
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form. The main amendments were: Observed text changed from "42 Avoiding inconsistency with State and Territory laws 29 Division 3—Other matters 33 43 Review by Administrative Appe…" to "41A When Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. program does not apply—exclusion by law of State or Territory 29 42 Avoiding inconsistency with St…".
Consideration of Senate message
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe final formal approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
The main criticism was that Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. is too small and too vague to fix housing affordability, while exposing buyers to risks in a shared-equity scheme if their circumstances change or rules are unclear. These concerns were raised most strongly by Coalition speakers, while some crossbench support remained conditional because the bill was seen as another demand-side measure that does not solve supply shortages.
Criticism was real but split between design risks and claims the policy was too limited to matter.
Too small to change affordability
Critics argued the scheme would help only a small number of people and leave the wider housing crisis largely unchanged, making it a weak response to a much bigger affordability problem.
Does not tackle housing supply
A repeated objection was that the bill is a demand-side subsidy that does not increase housing supply, so it cannot solve the underlying cause of high prices and may just help a few buyers compete in a tight market.
Unclear rules and buyer risk
Opponents said too many key details were left to later rules, leaving uncertainty about eligibility, repayment, ownership and what happens if a participant's circumstances change, including concern some people could be forced to sell.
Further sources
Votes
The chamber-passage votes come first. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Passed 36 to 29. Support came from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, and UAP. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
Earlier bill-stage votes
Passed 39 to 22. Support came from Liberal Party, Greens, Nationals, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor and minor parties and independents. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
Passed 85 to 55. Support came from Labor, Centre Alliance, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
Amendments grouped by chamber. Where APH reports aggregate counts, the package card summarizes the matching public amendment sheets by source theme.
House
Passed 74 to 62. Support came from Labor. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, Centre Alliance, and minor parties and independents. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
It was a procedural step to end debate and move immediately to the vote on the Senate amendments.
Passed 89 to 52. Support came from Labor, Greens, Centre Alliance, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party and Nationals. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The proposed change was agreed.
Defeated 16 to 67. Support came from Greens, Centre Alliance, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Liberal Party. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The amendment would have constrained ministerial control over eligibility and program settings, but the House rejected it.
Defeated 12 to 62. Support came from Centre Alliance and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Liberal Party. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The package aimed to make the scheme less vague and more accessible to people facing housing disadvantage, but the House rejected it.
The House agreed to the amendments made by the Senate, so the bill could pass both chambers in the same form.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Senate
Passed 39 to 22. Support came from Liberal Party, Greens, Nationals, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor and minor parties and independents. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
It was a procedural bid to slow the bills and force their later return to the chamber on a set timetable. The Senate agreed to the question.
Passed 36 to 29. Support came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, and UAP. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The amendments were technical safeguards to keep the scheme operating where sections 41A and 42 might otherwise affect CommonwealthThe federal government in Canberra, which provides the scheme money and owns the public share in each participating home. rights or program mechanics.
Defeated 17 to 38. Support came from Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, One Nation, and Nationals. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The package would have made the scheme more directive, more targeted, and more accountable, but the Senate rejected it.
Defeated 16 to 38. Support came from Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, One Nation, and Nationals. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The proposal would have forced the program to reserve places for specific disadvantaged groups, but it was defeated.
Senator Faruqi’s proposal, decided on voices, would have directed Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. to favour newly built, never-occupied homes near transport and set lower CommonwealthThe federal government in Canberra, which provides the scheme money and owns the public share in each participating home. contribution caps for those homes.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The Senate defeated Senator Faruqi’s second-reading amendment, which called for negative gearing and capital gains tax changes, a rent freeze and more public housing.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Government amendments clarify and restrict how the Help to Buy program interacts with State, Territory and local laws by letting participating jurisdictions declare excluded matters and avoid inconsistency with the scheme.
Passed on the voices
The chamber agreed to this amendment package without a counted vote. APH records the agreed count by amendment, while the source documents are grouped into amendment sheets.
This list includes amendment votes, procedural votes and votes on the bill itself.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Julie Collins supports the Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. bill and says it is another step to bring home ownership back within reach for more Australians.
Read in Hansard ↗Michael Sukkar says the coalition will oppose the bill because it is a late, half-hearted shared-equity scheme that leaves major questions unanswered and could force people to sell if their circumstances change.
Read in Hansard ↗Chaney says she will support the bill because it will help a targeted group of low- to middle-income buyers get into home ownership.
Read in Hansard ↗Tink opposes the bill as a headline-driven, short-term housing fix that lacks clear details, targeting and accountability.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
34 speakers · 37 contributions · 34 support
“The Help to Buy scheme fulfils Labor's election commitment to support up to 40,000 Australian families and households to purchase a home of their own. This will mean the government will support eligible homebuyers with an equity of up to 40 per cent for new homes and 30 per cent for existing homes. This policy will not only provide a foot in the door for Australians with smaller savings but also provide long-term relief for Australians who are part of the scheme.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I commend the bill to the House, and I encourage those opposite to march into their party room tomorrow and say: 'We've got it wrong. We need to dump our stupid policy and we need to actually vote for the government's legislation which will do something for 40,000 Australians to help them into the homeownership market.'”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“That's why this government is working to help more Australians into homeownership, to change that.. This Help to Buy program will support thousands of Australians to make that homeownership dream a reality, supporting those thousands of Australians who are branching out on their own, moving on from their parents' place or a share house and going to their own place to call home. This is life changing. We know that housing affordability is front of mind for many Australians. Help to Buy will take what can currently seem impossible and put that homeownership dream within reach.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Let's be clear on what this bill does. It's a national shared-equity scheme designed to help more Australians into homeownership, where homeowners can purchase property with just a two per cent deposit. The government will also support eligible homebuyers with an equity contribution—up to 40 per cent for new homes and 30 per cent for existing homes. It will support up to 40,000 low- and middle-income Australians to save hundreds every month on their mortgage. It's a good bill. It's a bill that will make a difference. It is not the whole answer to everything happening in the housing market. It is not the answer to every challenge before us. But it is an answer. It is one pathway. It is one thing that will make a difference. But, like every other bill we've brought to this place and every other plan we've brought to this place, it will be subjected to meme after meme after meme and click after click after click, and we will hear, 'No, no, no, no,' from those opposite, who just aren't interested in engaging.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In that cause, we are delivering the Help to Buy scheme. It's part of a wider package but an important measure in itself. The concept is very simple: the Albanese government, in partnership with state and territory governments, is going to assist low-income Australians to own a home by sharing the investment in that home with them. We know that there are significant barriers to homeownership, especially for younger and low-income Australians. We know that saving a deposit is hard when there are so many other cost pressures. We know that getting a loan is not easy. This scheme will assist by allowing government to take a share in the purchase of a home, thereby alleviating what is otherwise an obstacle that many Australians can't overcome.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It's time for the coalition and the Greens to get out of the way and allow Labor to get on with delivering our election commitment of helping thousands more Australians realise the dream of owning their home. I commend this bill to the Senate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Labor's Help to Buy Scheme is very simple. If we pass this bill, it will support up to 40,000 Australian households to purchase a home of their own. The federal government will invest in up to 40 per cent of the purchase price for new homes and 30 per cent for existing homes. So you will only need to get a mortgage for 60 or 70 per cent of the purchase price, which means the amount you need to save for a deposit is considerably lower. This bill is a lifeline for those who do not have wealthy parents to ask for a leg-up, for a deposit. The bill also means that, because your mortgage is considerably smaller, your repayments are considerably smaller. So not only does it make the home more affordable to save for; it makes it more affordable to pay off. This bill makes housing attainable for tens of thousands of Australian families who otherwise might never own their own home.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is an important component of the government's overarching response. It will help 40,000 households—40,000 families—and I very strongly commend it to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I really hope that the Senate looks at this bill, takes the opportunity to work together, instead of working against Australians and blocking housing, and gives this government the opportunity to build more houses and to help more people into houses of their own for their families, for their kids and for the memories that they'll build together over many years to come.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I appeal to the Greens to pass these bills and support our Help to Buy legislation, because the Greens know that each and every housing measure makes a huge difference to people's lives. We all know that we need to get on with building 1.2 million homes over the next five years. We all know we need to help people into homeownership, and we all know that shared-equity schemes like Help to Buy are an absolutely critical way of doing just that. So the message to the Greens is to just get this done. Just get this done!”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill is one of the many ways the Albanese Labor government is honouring our commitment to tackle the housing issue across the country, and I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It's my pleasure to rise in support of this important bill and genuine policy reform. In May 2022 Labor took the Help to Buy policy to our communities as one of our key election commitments. The Help to Buy Bill 2023 and Help to Buy (Consequential Provisions) Bill 2023 give effect to this commitment and provide for Housing Australia to administer the Help to Buy scheme, supported by a referral of power from the states.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I am going to remain hopeful because I have given a speech here about why Australians should have hope. It is because the Albanese government is delivering housing for Australians. We are delivering it through multiple, multiple means. But the one that we are debating here today deserves the support of the Senate. It should give people, Australians, the chance at having their own home.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I commend this bill to the House and I look forward to seeing what the Greens have to say in response.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Help to Buy scheme, the legislation that's before the House this evening, is another piece of help we're providing to Australians trying to set up their own home. It's help for thousands more Australians wanting to own their own home. Through Help to Buy, the Commonwealth will cut the cost of buying a home by up to 40 per cent. Participants will require only a minimum of a two per cent deposit and will benefit from lower ongoing mortgage repayments through having a smaller home loan. It will be the first national shared equity scheme of its kind, supporting up to 40,000 eligible Australians with purchasing a home. This scheme will be open to applications for four years, with 10,000 places available each year.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“By directly addressing the problems of saving for a deposit and the cost of repayments, the Help to Buy scheme will be life-changing for thousands of Australians who have been locked out of the security and stability of homeownership. We are in a housing emergency, and I know one thing about managing emergencies: you don't just do one thing; you do everything. You come at the problem from multiple directions to rescue the patient. Right now we are in a housing crisis, and our multipronged strategy, which is broad based and comes at this problem from every angle, addressing skills, supply chain, red tape and capital, is the way to solve the problem, not by carving up Australia and dividing it and pitting one generation against the other. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It's critical that governments at all levels consider every instrument available to them to increase the supply of housing across the nation, and that is what we are doing today. That is why we are debating this bill, because it is the right thing to do, it was an election commitment and now we are making good on it. As Regional Development Australia Central Coast, the RDACC, said, 'All governments need to get serious about creating more affordable housing on the Central Coast.' That is exactly what we are doing here today. We are making it easy for people to buy their first home, we are making sure that we are building more social and affordable housing and we are working with the states and territories, including the new Minns New South Wales government, to reduce red tape and increase housing approvals right across the country.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Owning a home is about a sense of security, confidence, stability and belonging—a foundation on which you can build a better future for yourself and your family. And every member from the Labor Party of this House is proud to vote for this legislation. It's another positive step in our plan to increase homeownership.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“If the Greens or the Liberal Party were serious about getting housing affordability under control, there is one very practical and pragmatic thing they could do: vote for this bill. Instead of grandstanding or being complacent, they should pull themselves together and vote for something that we can all agree on.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This government understands that affordable housing is critical to economic wellbeing and is committed to supporting more Australians to be able to access housing. The Help to Buy Scheme is an important part of that raft of strategies to make housing more affordable and accessible for Australians. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Greens and the Liberals need to stop standing in the way of first home buyers getting on that first step of the homeownership ladder. I implore them to do the right thing and get behind this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I commend the plans that are before us today. The Help to Buy scheme is long term and effective. It is a sustainable solution. It provides a vehicle towards homeownership. Under Labor there's a pathway to own your own home. Under the Liberals there are just roadblocks. And I'll say it again: our challenges are serious, but we have serious solutions.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Tim Ayres on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Tim Ayres supports the Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. bill and urges the Senate to pass it because he says it would help 40,000 low- and middle-income Australians buy homes with smaller mortgages, lower deposits and more affordable repayments. He argues opponents are putting partisan politics ahead of ordinary people who need housing support.
“All sorts of claims have been made—claims that it would have an inflationary impact. This is something in common between Senator McKim and Senator Bragg, It's just nonsense. It is not supported by any sensible economic analysis. The idea that this number of homes would have that kind of impact is wrong. All it would do is mean that low- and middle-income earners get a decent shake out of the housing system. I'm proud of these pieces of legislation. I urge senators to actually think about the faces behind the scheme—the people. If you can go down to the supermarket and look in the faces of nurses and teachers who can't afford homes, you've got less concern for the interests of ordinary Australians than I thought you did. I urge the Senate to support the bills.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Ayres supports the Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. bill and says it delivers a national shared-equity scheme that will help 40,000 low- and middle-income households get into homeownership by lowering deposits and mortgage costs. He presents it as a major Labor housing commitment alongside other housing measures.
“The Labor government committed to establishing a national shared-equity scheme to help 40,000 low- and middle-income Australian households into homeownership. Today marks a significant step to delivering that promise.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“This policy is here to help renters own their own homes, and yet the Greens and the Liberals want to oppose it. They want to oppose it because it's all politics for them. Despite their grandstanding, we're determined to get on with this job. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I urge all members in this House to support the passage of these bills for, in doing so, we will reaffirm our commitment to the fundamental principle that every Australian deserves a place to call home. I say to the Greens: I call on you not to hold this legislation hostage. Do not delay this bill like you delayed the Housing Australia Future Fund. Do not hold hostage the dream of homeownership for 40,000 Australians. Do not hold up this vital reform on some aspirational hill. This reform is practical and can be implemented immediately and will deliver for working Australians across this nation.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Shayne Neumann on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Shayne Neumann supports the bill because it gives effect to Labor's Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. policy and is meant to bring homeownership back within reach for 40,000 low- and middle-income households. He says it will help people buy with a smaller deposit and mortgage, which he argues is a practical response to the housing crisis.
“In the lead-up to the 2022 election we announced that we had a help-to-buy policy as one of our key commitments to tackling the housing crisis, and this particular legislation gives effect to that. It'll help put homeownership back within the reach for 40,000 low- and middle-income households who have been locked out of the housing market.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Shayne Neumann supports the Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. bill, saying it will help working-class and middle-class Australians get housing security and a path to home ownership. He argues the opposition and Greens are wrong to attack the scheme, because Labor is acting on housing and the bill gives people a real helping hand.
“I'm very pleased to rise to support the Help to Buy Bill 2023 and the related bill. I've been listening to the response from those opposite, who opposed the Housing Australia Future Fund, a $10 billion investment in housing this country which was to provide support for veterans, people in remote and regional Aboriginal communities, and women and children fleeing domestic and family violence—much-needed assistance.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“Today we are introducing legislation to make Help to Buy a reality.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill, alongside our ambitious housing agenda, is all about changing that reality.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We are also providing assistance to first-home buyers through the Help to Buy scheme, which is the bill before the parliament today. Help to Buy is the first national shared-equity scheme of its kind. It helps Australians get their feet on the housing ladder by reducing the amount required for both the saving of a deposit and the servicing of a mortgage. The government will loan applicants part of the upfront purchase price of a new home—either 30 per cent for an existing property or 40 per cent for a new build. Participants will require a two per cent deposit to access the scheme, making it significantly more affordable for participants. Forty thousand eligible participants will be able to access the scheme alongside a standard mortgage. This equity contribution ensures the sustainability of the program while offering lower ongoing mortgage repayments for individual participants. This scheme will be targeted at middle- and low-income Australians who might not otherwise be able to get a foot on the housing ladder.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Graham Perrett on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Perrett supports the Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. bill and argues it will help low- and middle-income Australians get into home ownership with a targeted shared-equity scheme and a low deposit. He says delaying the bill would worsen housing pressure and urges the House to pass it.
“I commend this bill to the House.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Graham Perrett supports the bill and says it delivers on the government's election promise to help up to 40,000 Australians buy a home by easing deposit and mortgage hurdles. He defends the scheme as carefully designed and criticises the opposition for trying to discredit it.
“I rise in support of the motion moved by the Hon. Minister for Housing and member for Franklin. The Help to Buy policy was a key election commitment that we took to the Australian people in 2022, and the Help to Buy Bill 2023 is honouring that commitment. This will support up to 40,000 Australians purchase a home of their own. Despite the coalition's attempts to discredit this policy during the election, the Help to Buy scheme is a solid, no-nonsense policy squarely aimed at giving those on low and middle incomes the opportunity to purchase a home by helping participants overcome the hurdles of saving for a deposit and servicing a mortgage.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“The Help to Buy Bill 2023 gives Housing Australia the power to enter into these shared equity arrangements. The scheme will give those on low and middle incomes an opportunity to buy a home with at least a two per cent deposit. This will allow them to access homeownership, which is linked to short-, medium- and long-term economic security, as all members understand. The scheme will help participants overcome both the hurdle of saving for a deposit and that of servicing a mortgage. We all know that these are some of the key barriers to homeownership.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Today we are introducing legislation to make Help to Buy a reality.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I really call on others in the parliament to come forward and support this bill. There is no public policy reason to stand in the path of 40,000 people who need and deserve the government's help. We deal with a lot of legislation in this parliament. We face few opportunities that are as clear as this one to, in one move, be able to change the lives of 40,000 people around our country, and I urge the Liberals and the Greens to work with the government to take it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Help to Buy scheme will be the first national shared equity scheme of its kind. It will be delivered through Housing Australia and will help Australians to overcome both the hurdle of saving for a deposit and servicing a mortgage.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
35 speakers · 34 oppose · 1 mixed
“For all of those reasons I reiterate that, as we said before the election, we do not support this bill. We do not support this half-hearted attempt at being seen to have any concern for Australia's housing market. It shouldn't be called the Help to Buy Bill; it should be called the 'Forced to Sell Bill'—that's what this will end up being. We in good conscious will not support it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“For all those reasons, I reiterate that, as we said before the election, we do not support this bill. It shouldn't be called the Help to Buy Bill; it should be called the 'Force to Sell Bill', because that's what it will end up doing to Australians. We cannot in good consciousness support this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We need to have details on which lenders will participate, how participants may be able to exit the scheme, how they may be able to buy the government out of their share and what the property price caps are. Will this be available for every single home in Australia, or will it be a target band? We don't have that level of detail yet. With so much unknown and uncertain about this proposal, the government are asking first home buyers to enter into this scheme and take a significant risk. The scheme also puts the Commonwealth at a financial risk if defaults on mortgages occur, due the removal of the need for lenders mortgage insurance. It's risky for homebuyers, it's risky for government and it's too risky for the coalition to support.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition will oppose the Help to Buy Bill 2023. The reason why is that we think $5.5 billion could be better spent elsewhere. As the member for Barker just said, very correctly, this is bad policy. This is policy on the run.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We don't support this bill. We know that there is a huge challenge when it comes to housing affordability and people accessing and achieving the great Australian dream. And it should be more than just a dream; it should be a reality for all Australians to have an ambition to own their own home. It would be good for the government to bring some legislation before this parliament that would actually have a likelihood of making any form of meaningful impact on that. This certainly doesn't. We don't support it, and I won't support the second reading passage of the bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I wish to conclude by saying that the Help to Buy Bill 2023 does not provide solutions that are in the national interest. That's why we oppose the bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I am opposed to this bill, because I believe this isn't a serious attempt to solve what is a significant problem in Australia at the moment. Similar programs have caused problems. On this side, we are opposed to the principle of excessive government involvement in peoples' affairs, and there are too many unanswered questions in relation to this piece of legislation.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill before the House is simply not fit for purpose and definitely doesn't meet the lofty ambitious agenda that Labor insisted would be seen with them in government. The Australian people have been again led up the garden path by this Prime Minister, who desperately needs a solution. Quite frankly, this is not it. For the reasons I've outlined, I support my coalition team in opposing this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Those on this side strongly stand by those Australians who have that aspiration and want to own their own home in their own name. We stand with those people. We will not give up. We will set out for Everest acknowledging the great challenges in front of us. They are many and will not be solved in the short term, but we will not set up on that ambition, give up at base camp and try to tell people that this is homeownership—that we've taken this first step, and that's going to get us there. The issue is more than that. The issue is more than just bricks and mortar or a roof over your head. The issue is your ability to have a place of your own, in your own name, outright, that you can be proud is yours. It's an ambition that Australians have held for such a long time, and I hope we can continue to hold it. I think it's worthy of fighting for. I don't think giving up on that ambition is worthy of the Australian people.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“However, this scheme that we are talking about, the shared-equity scheme in the Help to Buy 2023 Bill, is not going to achieve that for the Australian people. We know it's not the answer, because the uptake of shared-equity schemes in state jurisdictions shows that.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In that situation, how can this parliament support such a bill? It is reflective of an entirely failed policy area—housing—by the Albanese government.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This Help to Buy scheme, like so many others, promises a myth, a hope, a dream in which the fine detail actually destroys and which, like so many other Labor white elephants we have seen legislated in this place, will miss its target and fail to fulfill the dreams of young and old would-be homeowners alike. This bill and the associated bills will drive up the cost of cheaper homes—that is, if you can find a house under $950,000 in Sydney or $650,000 in Brisbane. The competition at that level will be that much fiercer because the lucky few who will fit into the odd angles of this scheme and its rules will believe that they have a 30 to 40 per cent head start on all the others who do not.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This Help to Buy Bill is not going to assist first home buyers into new homes. There are too many questions that have remained open and unanswered by the minister, and that is why this bill should not be supported.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“But I say to Australians: do not think that, once this legislation is through, there's going to be a miraculous change in the availability of housing, because there's more that needs to be done. It's a niche scheme at best, and poorly targeted, badly designed, poor value for taxpayers' money, and politics over policy substance. The coalition opposes this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We've also got significant problems in WA with delays in Western Power approvals and the cost. The Help to Buy scheme will not meet the needs of Australians in the circumstances that I'm talking about. But, again, I want to warn those who are considering taking up this option to please do your homework. Do your own due diligence so you are fully aware of all of the costs from the beginning to the end of this process. This will depend on the criteria the government sets, because they're not there now.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition opposes this bill. I remind the chamber that the Albanese Labor government promoting this bill is a government that breaks its promises. They promised 100 times not to change stage 3 tax cuts and broke that promise before Australia Day. Today, on this bill, the Albanese Labor government would have us believe they didn't break their Help to Buy promise. This policy was due to begin 1 January 2023—a little over a year ago. After their doomed referendum with an almost half-a-billion-dollar taxpayer bill, Labor have been so distracted that they didn't get on with this initiative until now and broke their promise of starting it almost 14 months ago. Another looming broken promise is the ticking clock on the Albanese government's promise to build 1.2 million homes over five years from 1 July 2024. The Housing Industry Association has confirmed Labor will fail to deliver at least 200,000 homes on this target. Only the Labor apologists think the full target can be achieved. Those are the same delirious apologists who think Labor's $275 reduction in power bills will materialise in its promised time frame.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I'm all for supporting the government in any type of initiative that will actually help people. And there have been times when there has been bipartisan support for different bills, which have gone through. When we were in government, they supported some of ours. Now they're in government, we have supported some of theirs. But we will not support the bills that are not going to cut through and that are not the best spend of taxpayers' money, and this is one of those cases. It's as simple as that. It's our job to make sure that the government are spending taxpayers' money wisely, and in this case they are simply not.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This Help to Buy scheme is late. It's another broken promise. It lacks detail. You must have known after the referendum that Australians want detail. They want the detail on their policies so they can make an informed decision. We've got the Prime Minister here. Please, the best thing you can do, Prime Minister, is get rid of this legislation.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Labor has failed again to do what it should to keep its promises. The Help to Buy Bill 2023 is now being debated in 2024. It should have been done if Labor were serious many, many months ago—last year. Too little, too late—not good enough, Labor.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“There is so much wrong with this bill, the Help to Buy Bill 2023. I want to start with the last point. In my maiden speech I referred to an Italian phrase which I spend a lot of time thinking about, particularly in my public life. Loosely translated, it is 'between the saying and doing, there's the ocean between'. And so it is here in terms of this shared-equity proposal by those opposite. There is a long way between the saying and the doing.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Unfortunately, it will be another lame duck scheme that will attract very little interest.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In Queensland, we have a situation where we need 48,000 houses built a year. Currently the market is at full noise reaching 34,000. So we're 14,000 houses short at the moment, and what this debate on the Help to Buy bill allows us to do is address the demand and supply push. We'll be opposing this, and all the speakers on the coalition have made that point abundantly clear. We'll be opposing this bill because we just can't work out how it addresses the supply side of the argument. When I talk to builders, the ones that haven't gone broke recently—and Madam Speaker, as you would well know, if you turn the television on and watch the news cycle, it's with awkward regularity that we're seeing building companies collapse, under this government. It is with awkward regularity that we're seeing local builders go broke, under this government. It's just shameful that we're seeing this spike in builders leaving the industry since Labor came to power.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I think the proposal as it stands won't do any harm, but it won't do any good. It's likely to be underspent some way down the path. We'll say, 'Well, that one didn't work.' I guess you could say that at least the money wasn't wasted, but, if it it's not going to do any good, I wonder what on earth we're standing here debating for today.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“What is this Albanese government's response to this housing crisis? Well, it's this so-called Help to Buy scheme before us today, a policy that is, frankly, too little too late. This policy was at the front and centre of those opposite's housing agenda before the last election, yet it has taken them some 20 months to bring it before the House. Despite the delay, we still have so many unanswered questions. Basic questions around eligibility and home improvements are yet to be answered. Honestly, they've had plenty of time to sort this out. It's unclear whether this Help to Buy Bill will instead force people to sell.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition wants a smaller government. The politicians on this side of the House do not want to tell people what cars they have to buy. They don't want to force people to go into partnership with the government to buy their home. We want people to be aspirational and to have that vision and to have that security. That's why we will oppose this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Coming back to this bill, this bill does not provide any details to give a young family the information that they need to make an informed decision as to whether they want to enter into a long-term financial arrangement with the government—because that's exactly what they are doing with this bill. I would have thought that this housing minister would have had all these ducks in a row after 13 months of delay in bringing this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We need to address this and we need the government to act. They're not acting through this bill; as a matter of fact, they're making a bad situation worse, because the maths just do not add up. The questions are not being answered and it is another debacle. This is the absolute responsibility of the government. They need to do better and they need to do better quickly.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This goes to the core values and visions of the two governing parties of this country, and this bill should be opposed.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Help to Buy Bill seems to be more about fulfilling an electoral promise than crafting a well thought out solution to the housing affordability crisis. After waiting for over 20 months for this legislation, it appears to be more of a rushed effort than a comprehensive plan.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This Help to Buy Bill 2023 offers a niche program that categorically fails to address the real and pressing need in the housing market. It fails to address the market. It's not going to have a real impact on increasing the supply of our national housing stock.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We do need to encourage people and give people the opportunity to own their own home or, if they're not in a situation to own their own home, have a secure roof over their head, paying a level of rent they can afford. Nobody in this House disagrees with that proposition—nobody. But I don't believe that this bill as it's currently constructed without the relevant KPIs to force the state governments to do their job of providing social and affordable housing will achieve the results we're seeking to achieve.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“There are a lot of other issues that the government could be dealing with that would stimulate the construction and purchase of homes without setting up a scheme where lying next to you in bed is the federal government as a part owner in your home. So we certainly think that this proposal is not to be supported. I won't be voting for this bill, for that very reason. I ask the government to go back to the drawing board and look at some practical, sensible solutions to help Australians own their own home.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Help to Buy will help very few Australians. This is a massive problem requiring a serious solution from a serious government. Australia does not have that at the moment, and that's why it's urgent that we get on and have the election so we can get rid of this terrible government and get the Australian dream back on track.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We need a government who will empower Aussies to confidently enter the housing market. The scheme is too little, too niche and too underwhelming. Those who want to buy a home want to own it themselves; they don't want the government owning a portion. We need to be empowering and supporting Australians as they aspire to accomplish homeownership, to reap the full reward and satisfaction of their hard work.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I won't go into some of the failings of the particular model that Labor have proposed. That's been done very articulately by other speakers on this side. I'll just mention that I think the number of households and people that this will help is quite minuscule, and, obviously, the money's quite huge for the number of houses and the number of people that it will potentially or maybe help. So I think it's poorly designed.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
13 speakers · 14 contributions · 10 oppose · 3 mixed
“Let's talk about this Help to Buy scheme that the government loves to talk about. You'll notice that they say, 'This is a scheme that's going to help people to buy a house.' They conveniently always forget to mention that it will only help 0.2 per cent of renters every year. For the other 99.8 per cent of renters, it will drive up the cost of housing. Don't ask the Greens, though. Here are two different senior economists—two radical lefties, by the way. One is Saul Eslake, former ANZ chief economist and notable radical leftie. Commenting on the New South Wales shared-equity scheme, he said, 'Anything that allows first home buyers to pay more for housing than they otherwise would will result in higher house prices and, as a result, lower homeownership rates.' Another radical lefty, AMP chief economist Shane Oliver, echoed this, arguing that bringing forward demand for housing risks worsening the crisis. The Prime Minister said, 'The New South Wales shared equity scheme is working really well.' Well, last year there were 3,000 places in that shared equity scheme. Can anyone take a guess at how many people took advantage of it? One hundred and seventy-two. That is a 95 per cent fail rate. It's almost comical. It would be comical if it were not for the fact that this government has the power to lift millions of people out of rental and housing stress and is instead lying to people. They get up and they say, 'We're about caring about people being able to afford a home,' but they absolutely know that this scheme will not lift the millions of people who are in desperate need of help right now out of housing and rental stress.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In conclusion, Help to Buy as it's currently proposed fails to address the underlying causes of the housing affordability crisis in Australia. It aims to assist a small fraction of potential homeowners, and its limited scope and demand side approach are likely to exacerbate the housing crisis without offering any of the solutions that the government knows would work, as they did in the 20th century. This is a deeply unambitious policy introduced at a critical point where homelessness and rental and mortgage stress are skyrocketing. The government has the opportunity to work with the Greens and the crossbench right now to start to address these systemic issues that are forcing more people into housing stress and homelessness. Tinkering around the edges will not help the vast majority of people. The scheme's impact on house prices, although minimal in the broader context of the national housing market, represents a misguided allocation of resources that could otherwise be directed towards more effective solutions to this crisis. Please work with us to get good outcomes for people, rather than trying to force these bills on for a vote when you know they won't pass. (Time expired)”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“From the moment that this bill was introduced, the Greens have been willing to pass Labor's Help to Buy scheme if Labor negotiated with us on negative gearing and capital gains tax discounts.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I need to say that from the moment this bill was introduced the Greens have been willing to work with Labor to pass this scheme if they negotiate with us on the policy that actually matters, like removing negative gearing and capital gains tax discounts and a whole bunch of other really important policies.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Housing policy in this country is geared towards pushing up housing prices, and the bill before us today is no different. It is more of the same.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I say this: if you don't use this opportunity in the House, then we won't be supporting this bill in the House. You've got the chance, before it goes to the Senate, to start tackling these big issues of tax handouts to the wealthy, building more public housing and capping and freezing rents. But, if you choose not to, Labor—if you make 2024 the year that you continue backing wealthy property investors—then the anger from renters and first home buyers is going to continue to grow.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill represents a deeply unambitious policy, introduced at a time when homelessness is becoming such an entrenched problem. As I said, the cracks were starting to show with the millennials, and now we're asking whether our gen Zs and even our gen alphas will ever be able to afford their own homes. Once homelessness becomes so entrenched in our community, it doesn't just go away.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Schemes like Help to Buy allow people to pay more for housing than they otherwise would be able to afford. As a result of these demand-side support measures—and there are other examples of these types of schemes, including the first home buyers grant and the coalition's HomeBuilder program—overall homeownership rates are lowered, as more people are priced out of housing. So, while the Help to Buy scheme might help the 0.2 per cent of people lucky to get access to the scheme, for the other 99.8 per cent it will make things worse by driving up house prices even further. Even though this is a small scheme, anything that pushes house prices up in the middle of a housing affordability crisis is a step in the wrong direction, and this is a decision that the Greens are not prepared to take.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“But this piece of legislation is totally inadequate. Rather than the government working with the Greens, the crossbench and others in this chamber to improve and deliver real solutions for people, we have a piece of legislation that is effectively useless. It does nothing to deal with those real issues.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Nick McKim, including an amendment-moving contribution. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
McKim opposes the Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. bill, saying Labor's housing response is far too small for the scale of the crisis and that the scheme would help very few renters while pushing up house prices for everyone else.
“Since Labor came to power about two years ago, rents in Australia have increased by 30 per cent on average. Since Labor came to power about two years ago, mortgages have increased by an average of over $1,600 a month. More and more people are experiencing housing stress, and yet, instead of the big, bold, reformist approach proposed by the Australian Greens to respond to this massive social crisis, we're getting tinkering at the margins. What we are getting from Labor is, frankly, a pathetic response given the scale of the crisis. A centrepiece of that response is the Help to Buy scheme, which is basically a lottery that would help 0.2 per cent of renters and put house prices up for the other 99.8 per cent.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Moved amendment
McKim opposes the Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. bill and moves a delaying amendment, arguing it would help only a tiny share of renters while pushing up house prices for everyone else. He says the bill worsens the housing crisis instead of fixing it.
“Why are you putting forward legislation that will provide fractional help to 0.2 of one per cent of Australian renters and actually disadvantage the other 99.8 per cent of Australian renters? That is the question that you have to explain to the Australian people and, in particular, to Australian renters, 99.8 per cent of whom are going to be disadvantaged by this legislation, because, as with so much of your government's housing policy, you are going to contribute yet again to turbocharging house prices in Australia, which, of course, will price more and more people out of the market.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“Now, the Greens have outlined our key asks in return for supporting passage of the legislation. These include action on freezing and capping rents, ending the tax handouts for property investors that stop renters buying their first home, and establishing a government owned property developer that would build 610,000 homes, to be sold off at just above the cost of construction, with rents capped at 25 per cent of income. Labor has not offered a single good-faith response to these proposals. The Greens are fighting for a two-year freeze on rent increases; a phase-out of unfair tax concessions, like negative gearing; and the reinvestment of this money into building beautiful, government built, sold and rented homes that people can actually afford. We need to take the real steps necessary to address the rental crisis. Australians deserve more than a housing lottery bill where 98 per cent of renters lose. This action must be taken.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Australians deserve and need more than a housing lottery bill where 99.8 per cent of renters get nothing.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise today to speak to the Help to Buy Bill 2023. It's called 'help to buy', but this bill won't help many. It'll help only about 0.2 per cent of renters while leaving behind the other 99.8 per cent. This just does not address the enormity of the housing crisis.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 3 contributions · 2 oppose
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Malcolm Roberts on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Roberts says One Nation opposes the Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. bill because it will push up house prices, leaves major operating details unresolved, and sits on shaky constitutional ground. He argues the government should focus instead on supply, immigration, foreign ownership, and measures that help people own homes outright.
“One Nation cannot support this bill without key details of its operation clarified and without action on the other, far more important elements of housing supply and demand.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Roberts opposes the Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. bill, saying it will not help the housing crisis and will instead push prices up by subsidising buyers. He also argues the scheme is constitutionally flawed, overly complex, and does nothing to address high immigration and the shortage of tradies driving the problem.
“The Albanese government, though, wants to look like it's doing something—not do something but look like. Enter this Help to Buy plan. Under this plan, the government wants to own a significant part of your house. If it's an existing place, the government wants to own 30 per cent, and, if it's a new place, 40 per cent, with the government paying for part of it with low-income earners. While a 40 per cent subsidy might sound attractive, it's fatally flawed. If the government just borrows more money for this plan, then one thing is going to happen. When you give 40 per cent more money to people to buy a house, house prices are going to go up. House prices will go up.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“You are so far behind the eight ball. You're absolutely hopeless. I will not support this bill, based on the fact that it's a dog of a bill; it won't do anything. And it's not because I don't care about the Australian people. It's because you haven't got it right.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
10 speakers · 11 contributions · 6 support · 3 oppose · 1 mixed
“Specifically, the lack of overarching goals and objectives, the lack of consideration of policy areas relevant to housing, including migration, the settlement policy, income support, financial regulation and tax, and the lack of any clear recognition that the housing system status quo is in need of fundamental change all mean, as we stand here today and are asked to pass this legislation, that we're asked to do so in a bubble of hope rather than the pursuit of tangible change in course.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“On balance, I'll be supporting this bill. It will give relief to a small number of targeted low- to middle-income homebuyers. It will not, however, solve Australia's housing crisis. It's a small puzzle piece in a much larger problem which needs longer term systemic reform.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Notwithstanding my concerns, I am a supporter of the Help to Buy scheme and the government's housing agenda more broadly, and I look forward to voting in favour of it and similar legislation in the future.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by David Pocock on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Pocock supports the Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. bill and says it will help people without wealthy parents, older women and single parents get into homeownership. He argues it should be amended to expand the scheme, run longer, and focus more clearly on disadvantaged Australians.
“I back the intent of this bill because it will help people who don't have wealthy parents get into housing. We live in a country now where the bank of mum and dad is one of the biggest lenders, and, if you don't have wealthy parents, you're basically stuffed. We can't allow that to happen. We need to start putting measures in place now and also dealing with some of the root causes of the crisis that we're in. This bill will help older women—the cohort most at risk of homelessness—purchase a home on their own, and the same for single parents. While technically a demand-side measure when what we need is more supply, this bill will help some of the most vulnerable people in our community get into homeownership.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Pocock supports the Help to BuyThe shared-equity home ownership scheme in this bill, where the Commonwealth pays part of the purchase price and keeps a stake in the home. bill as a useful first step for people who cannot rely on wealthy parents to get into home ownership, but says it is only part of the answer and needs amendments. He backs the bill while pressing for a bigger, longer-lasting scheme and broader housing reforms to address the root causes of the crisis.
“The housing system in this country is in trouble—there's no doubt about that; just get on the street and talk to people—but it's not beyond hope. These proposals that we're voting on today have their place. They're part of it, but they're clearly not going to solve the whole thing. So I'd urge the Senate to support these sorts of measures but then really get on with addressing some of the root causes, which, unfortunately, I think we're often not very good at, at times. I look forward to supporting the Help to Buy Bill as one part of helping people—people who can't rely on the bank of mum and dad to get them into the housing market.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“I'll be supporting the bill. It's not perfect, but it's better than nothing. If we don't get this bill through the parliament, those 40,000 homes which hopefully will be bought or built will not happen. I take the point from the member for Forrest. Yes, there are lots of questions. Yes, people need to go into this scheme with their eyes wide open. But that doesn't mean we stop it. Maybe we need to amend something; we need to fix it—put in some safeguards. I don't know. But it's no reason to stop it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Although affordability of property is the desired outcome, this may not be the case. Additional demand for houses under this scheme may place pressure on prices, which ultimately benefits sellers and not buyers.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So this bill, I believe, will not be a help-to-buy bill. I have a fundamental problem with government intervention. I hope I have made this point in this address—that is, when the government encourages a couple or an individual—”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill, the Help to Buy Bill 2023, epitomises everything that's been wrong with government policy over the last 40 years, and that is, effectively, governments have privatised all the public assets and now they want to nationalise all the private assets. The whole point of government is to build infrastructure that provides essential services and have that infrastructure generating recurring revenue to pay for the recurring costs of schools and hospitals. But we are now going to risk $10 billion of taxpayers' money to build 30,000 houses over five years, or 6,000 houses a year. When you have an immigration rate of over half a million people a year, how hard would it have been to just lower the immigration rate by 10,000 or 15,000 people? There's your problem solved; you don't even need to look at putting $10 billion on the line.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“As I mentioned at the outset, I will not stand in the way of this bill. I will support this bill because I want every Australian to be able to realise their dream of owning their own home. However, I'll make it very clear that I will withdraw my support for this bill if amendments are made that reflect the wishes of the Australian Greens, who seek to attack the mums and dads of this country who have worked hard to buy a second home. Any changes to negative gearing or capital gains tax would be a broken promise and one that I steadfastly object to.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This scheme is due to run for four years, meaning 40,000 individuals, families and couples will be helped into a home. About 850 of those spots have been earmarked for Tasmanians. Eight hundred and fifty home purchases over the next four years—that's a whole lot of happy people who can now buy a home, people who thought they may not have been able to or would be saving for a deposit for years to come. And those 850 homes are on top of the home purchases already being supported through the housing scheme that is running in Tasmania.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration., opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 85 to 55.
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration., meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Consideration in detail debate
Consideration in detail
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration., opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading amendment agreed to Details: Further consideration of bill postponed to 26 November 2024
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration., opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration. agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second readingThe parliamentary stage where MPs debate whether to support the bill in principle before detailed consideration., meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Committee of the whole: amendments considered
Amendment packages agreed
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 36 to 29.
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
House · Message from Senate reported
Message from Senate reported
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Consideration of Senate message
House agreed to Senate amendments
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe final formal approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.
Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (18/04/2024)
Referred to committee
Referred to Committee (30 Nov 2023): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (18 Apr 2024)
APH bill page notes