Emergency Response Fund Amendment (Disaster Ready Fund)

Current status

This bill became law on Nov 29th, 2022.

Policy area

Government & democracy

What does this bill do?

Australia keeps the old Emergency Response FundThe former name of the fund, which the bill keeps in place but repurposes. but renames it the Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery., so the same fund continues under a new name focused on future disaster readiness.

Why was it introduced?

The old Emergency Response FundThe former name of the fund, which the bill keeps in place but repurposes. could fund recovery, resilience and mitigation measures. This bill renames it the Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. and, from 2023-24, focuses up to $200 million a year on disaster resilience and risk reduction, with reporting and review requirements.

Broader context

Australia already had the Emergency Response FundThe former name of the fund, which the bill keeps in place but repurposes. from 2019, with capped annual funding for recovery and resilience or mitigation projects. Ministers argued after Black Summer and the 2022 floods in South-East Queensland and New South Wales that the fund had not delivered enough preparedness work. The bill kept the fund, renamed it the Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery., and from 2023-24 focused up to $200 million a year on resilience and mitigation before Parliament passed it in November 2022.

Key criticism

The main criticism was that the bill mostly rebadged an existing fund, did not add much genuinely new money, and could shift attention or funding away from disaster recovery while communities were still rebuilding. That case was raised most strongly by the Greens and by some Coalition speakers, but Coalition support largely remained conditional rather than outright opposition.

Who supported it?

Clare O'neil MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in House 07 Sept 2022
Passed House 27 Oct 2022
Passed Senate 22 Nov 2022
Became law 29 Nov 2022

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 29 Nov 2022

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

2 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Passage speed

83 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Australia keeps the old Emergency Response FundThe former name of the fund, which the bill keeps in place but repurposes. but renames it the Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery., so the same fund continues under a new name focused on future disaster readiness.

  2. From 2023-24, the Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. is set aside for disaster resilience and risk reduction, with up to $200 million a year available instead of ongoing recovery spending.

  3. The Treasurer and Finance Minister must review the yearly funding cap at least every 5 years, so the amount can be reconsidered over time.

  4. The Emergency Management MinisterThe minister who must publish the yearly report on the fund and is involved in some fund decisions. must publish a yearly report on Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. grants and funding deals, so Parliament can see how decisions were used each year.

  5. An independent reviewA separate review required within five years to examine how the fund is working, including transparency and whether more law changes are needed. must be done within 5 years to check Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. grants, decision-making and transparency, and whether more legal changes are needed.

Show source excerpts
  1. (1) The Emergency Response Fund is continued in existence with the new name the Disaster Ready Fund.
    Emergency Response Fund Amendment (Disaster Ready Fund) Act 2022 final Act text
  2. New Division 5 would reflect the Government’s decision to dedicate the Disaster Ready Fund solely for natural disaster resilience and risk reduction initiatives from 2023-24 onwards. The changes by this item would provide for an annual limit of $200 million for debits relating to natural disaster resilience and risk reduction initiatives. The Disaster Ready Fund would not be available to fund natural disaster recovery after 2022-23.
    Emergency Response Fund Amendment (Disaster Ready Fund) explanatory memorandum
  3. (8) At least once every 5 years, the responsible Ministers must conduct a review of the operation of paragraphs (1)(c) and (d).
    Emergency Response Fund Amendment (Disaster Ready Fund) Act 2022 final Act text
  4. (1) The Emergency Management Minister must cause to be prepared, as soon as practicable after the end of each financial year, an annual report on the exercise of the Minister’s functions and powers under section 20 (which deals with arrangements and grants) during the year.
    Emergency Response Fund Amendment (Disaster Ready Fund) Act 2022 final Act text
  5. (1) The Emergency Management Minister must cause an independent review of the following matters to be undertaken before the fifth anniversary of the commencement of this section:
    Emergency Response Fund Amendment (Disaster Ready Fund) Act 2022 final Act text

Broader context for this bill

Australia already had the Emergency Response FundThe former name of the fund, which the bill keeps in place but repurposes. from 2019, with capped annual funding for recovery and resilience or mitigation projects. Ministers argued after Black Summer and the 2022 floods in South-East Queensland and New South Wales that the fund had not delivered enough preparedness work. The bill kept the fund, renamed it the Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery., and from 2023-24 focused up to $200 million a year on resilience and mitigation before Parliament passed it in November 2022.

  1. 2019-20

    Black Summer bushfires expose the cost of poor preparedness

    Ministers cited Black Summer as a major example of the devastation and long recovery that followed when communities were not adequately prepared for extreme disasters.

    Hansard ↗
  2. October 2019

    Parliament creates the Emergency Response FundThe former name of the fund, which the bill keeps in place but repurposes.

    The Commonwealth set up the Emergency Response FundThe former name of the fund, which the bill keeps in place but repurposes. as a standing source of disaster financing, including capped annual funding for recovery and resilience or mitigation measures.

    Hansard ↗
  3. 2022

    South-East Queensland and New South Wales floods renew pressure for resilience spending

    Speakers pointed to the 2022 floods, including severe impacts in Brisbane and Lismore, as proof that worsening disaster seasons required more money to be spent before disasters struck.

    Hansard ↗
  4. 07 Sept 2022

    Government introduces the Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. bill

    The government introduced legislation to rename the fund and focus it on disaster resilience and risk reduction from 2023-24.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  5. 23 Nov 2022

    Parliament passes the bill

    Both houses agreed on the final text, clearing the way for the old fund to continue under a new name and purpose.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  6. 29 Nov 2022

    Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. changes become law

    Royal AssentThe final step that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act of Parliament. turned the bill into an Act, locking in the renamed fund and its new reporting and review requirements.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  7. 2023-24

    Annual resilience funding begins under the Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery.

    From 2023-24, up to $200 million a year was to be available for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction, and the fund would no longer be available for disaster recovery after 2022-23.

    Australian Parliament House ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 07 Sept 2022

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 07 Sept 2022

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee; Committee report (16/11/2022) review 08 Sept 2022

Referred to Committee (08/09/2022): Senate Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee; Committee report (16/11/2022)

Referred to committee

APH bill page notes
Second reading debate 25 Oct 2022

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Sent to Federation Chamber for debate 25 Oct 2022

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Referred to Federation Chamber

Second reading debate 26 Oct 2022

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate 27 Oct 2022

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Returned from Federation Chamber 27 Oct 2022

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Reported from Federation Chamber

House second reading agreed 27 Oct 2022

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House agreed to amendment packages 27 Oct 2022

The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.

Consideration in detail debate

House third reading agreed 27 Oct 2022

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber. Later message exchanges with the other chamber were still recorded afterwards.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 21 Nov 2022

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 21 Nov 2022

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 22 Nov 2022

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate second reading agreed 22 Nov 2022

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Senate agreed to amendment packages 22 Nov 2022

The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.

Committee of the Whole debate

Senate third reading agreed 22 Nov 2022

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Message from Senate reported 23 Nov 2022

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

House agreed to Senate amendments 23 Nov 2022

The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.

Consideration of Senate message

Passed both houses 23 Nov 2022

Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.

Finally passed both Houses

Assent 29 Nov 2022

The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe final step that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act of Parliament., turning the bill into an Act.

The main case against this bill

The main criticism was that the bill mostly rebadged an existing fund, did not add much genuinely new money, and could shift attention or funding away from disaster recovery while communities were still rebuilding. That case was raised most strongly by the Greens and by some Coalition speakers, but Coalition support largely remained conditional rather than outright opposition.

Criticism focused more on funding design and safeguards than on the goal of disaster resilience itself.

Not enough new funding

Critics argued the bill mostly renamed an existing fund instead of delivering substantial new disaster mitigation money, so it risked looking like a title change rather than a major policy expansion.

Raised by Michael McCormack and other critics of the bill as drafted Source ↗

Recovery funding could be weakened

Opponents warned that moving the fund toward resilience spending could reduce the pool available for disaster recovery at a time when flood-hit communities still needed large-scale clean-up and rebuilding support.

Raised by Kevin Hogan and Max Chandler-Mather Source ↗

Too much discretion and too little detail

Some supporters wanted tighter rules on how money would be allocated, which projects would qualify, and how changes to the spending cap would be made, warning that transparency and accountability were not strong enough in the original design.

Raised by Aaron Violi, Kate Chaney and Coalition senators seeking amendments Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

27 Oct 2022

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

22 Nov 2022

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Amendments at a glance

Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.

House

Carried

Call for meaningful disaster action

Aye 89 No 54

Passed 89 to 54. Support came from Labor, Greens, Centre Alliance, Katter's Australian Party, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party and Nationals. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

27 Oct 2022

The unresolved division was on the second-reading question in the Federation Chamber report, and defeating the amendment allowed the bill's second reading to proceed.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 63 / 0
Unknown 16 / 23
Liberal Party 0 / 19
Nationals 0 / 12
Independent 7 / 0
Greens 1 / 0
Centre Alliance 1 / 0
Katter's Australian Party 1 / 0
Carried

House of Representatives agreed to Government amendments

The APH progress record says 3 Government amendments were agreed without a counted division being collected by this run.

Carried on voices

The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.

Carried

House accepted all Senate amendments

The House agreed to the amendments made by the Senate, so the bill could pass both chambers in the same form.

Carried on voices

The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.

Senate

Defeated

Ban disaster fund fossil fuel assets

Aye 13 No 32

Defeated 13 to 32. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, Jacqui Lambie Network, Nationals, and minor parties and independents.

22 Nov 2022

The amendment was defeated 32 to 13, so the bill kept no fossil-fuel investment ban and continued unchanged on that point.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 16
Greens 12 / 0
Unknown 0 / 8
Liberal Party 0 / 5
Independent 1 / 0
Jacqui Lambie Network 0 / 1
Nationals 0 / 1
One Nation 0 / 1
Carried

Senate adds opposition fund oversight

The APH progress record says 1 Opposition amendment was agreed without a counted division being collected by this run.

Carried on voices

The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.

Carried

Senate adds Pocock advice tabling

The APH progress record says 1 Independent amendment was agreed without a counted division being collected by this run.

Carried on voices

The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.

Carried

Table Future Fund advice with determinations

The Senate agreed on voices to require the Future Fund BoardThe expert board that gives advice on the fund’s investment arrangements and any proposed changes to the spending cap.’s advice to be tabled in each House of Parliament with the related determination.

Carried on voices

The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.

These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.

The parliamentary record also shows 3 Government amendments, 1 Opposition amendment, and 1 Independent amendment agreed without a counted division.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Clare O'Neil

Australian Labor Party • MP 07 Sept 2022

O'Neil supports the bill, saying it turns the old emergency response fundThe former name of the fund, which the bill keeps in place but repurposes. into a proper Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. that will invest up to $200 million a year in resilience and risk reduction.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead opposing voice Opposes

Michael McCormack

National Party • MP 26 Oct 2022

McCormack opposes the bill as drafted because he says it mostly renames an existing fund without adding new money or meaningful action.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Aaron Violi

Liberal Party • MP 26 Oct 2022

Violi says the coalition will support the bill because it keeps funding disaster resilience and recovery, but he argues it does not add new money and presses the government to treat real disaster action as bipartisan.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

David Pocock

Independent • Senator 22 Nov 2022

Pocock supports the bill as a step toward shifting disaster funding from recovery to preparedness, but says it is only a start and wants stronger transparency and more investment in resilience.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

15 speakers · 15 support

  1. Carol Brown Carol Brown supports the bill, saying it fulfils Labor's commitment to turn the former Emergency Response FundThe former name of the fund, which the bill keeps in place but repurposes. into a permanent Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. for disaster resilience and risk reduction.
    “The Disaster Ready Fund Bill makes good on this commitment. The Bill will transform the former Government's failed Emergency Response Fund into a dedicated ongoing source of funding for natural disaster resilience and risk reduction initiatives.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 21 Nov 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Shayne Neumann Shayne Neumann supports the bill and says it is a sensible step that will let the Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. spend $200 million a year on resilience and risk reduction.
    “The amendments in this bill change the name of the former government's emergency response fund to the Disaster Ready Fund, allow $200 million to be debited from the DRF for natural disaster resilience and risk reduction, and allow the minister to adjust that maximum disbursement amount by a disallowable legislative instrument. I think that's a sensible move, to be honest with you. It will facilitate the transfer of responsibility for fund expenditure to the new National Emergency Management Agency, NEMA, and streamline administrative arrangements in this space.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Susan Templeman Templeman supports the bill because it will finally put the dormant disaster fund to work and invest in resilience measures that communities facing floods and fires urgently need.
    “I absolutely welcome that, finally, we're going to get to see this significant fund being used, and put to good use, rather than having it sit languishing as it has done for years. I remember that when we first voted for this fund we supported the government on this fund even though they took money away from university assets to do it. But we said, 'This is needed and it's needed now.' That was years ago and not a cent has been spent. It has earnt interest but that has not helped my community. I am very pleased to see tangible action from the Albanese government.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Rob Mitchell Mitchell supports the bill and says it delivers an important Labor election commitment to create a Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. that will invest up to $200 million a year in resilience and preparedness.
    “That's why I will be supporting this bill and commend it to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Matt Thistlethwaite Matt Thistlethwaite supports the bill and says Australia needs the Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. because climate change is driving worse floods, bushfires and cyclones.
    “The Albanese Labor government accepts that climate change is occurring. We accept the advice of climate scientists and economists who say that the costs associated with climate change are going to grow unless we invest in mitigation infrastructure, and that is exactly what this bill does. It ensures that the government establishes the Disaster Ready Fund, investing up to $200 million a year, matched by the states and territories, in disaster risk reduction and mitigation. The CSIRO has found that, for every dollar spent reducing disaster risk, it will save between $2 and $11 on disaster recovery and reconstruction.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Kristy McBain McBain supports the bill, saying it will turn the former fund into a dedicated, ongoing source of money for disaster resilience and risk reduction, and arguing that this is needed because earlier governments left communities dangerously unprepared.
    “I'm relieved this bill, the Emergency Response Fund Amendment (Disaster Ready Fund) Bill 2022, will transform the former government's Emergency Response Fund into a dedicated, ongoing source of funding for natural disaster resilience and risk reduction initiatives. This government, through the Disaster Ready Fund, will provide up to $200 million per year to invest in mitigation projects like firebreaks, flood levees, cyclone shelters and evacuation centres around the country. When I travel through my communities across Eden-Monaro—from Batlow to Cobargo, from Braidwood to Kiah—I know from listening to locals who are still struggling with the hurdles and the mental toll of recovery that an ongoing funding source for disaster resilience and risk reduction is going to be much appreciated.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Fiona Phillips Phillips strongly supports the bill, saying it will help create a Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. that reflects what her community learned from the bushfires and will fund practical resilience projects like emergency facilities, telecommunications, and mobile black spot fixes.
    “These are the things that this Disaster Ready Fund can do—the difference that we can make now as the Albanese government. This is a $1 billion fund to mitigate potential disaster loss and damage. It is critical. It will save lives. It will make sure that our devastating experience during the bushfires hasn't all been in vain.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Joanne Ryan Ryan supports the bill and says it is a sensible preventative response to climate change and recurring floods, fires and cyclones.
    “This bill is about ensuring that as a country we have a fund that allows us to do preventative things rather than just respond to these events. I think every Australian will welcome the government putting in place these measures.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  9. Luke Gosling Gosling strongly supports the bill because he says the Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. will deliver real action on mitigation and help communities prepare for worsening floods, fires and cyclones.
    “So I'm delighted that this Disaster Ready Fund bill will lead to real action in terms of both mitigation and support for those who will inevitably be affected by worsening weather events. This fund will provide up to $200 million per year to invest in mitigation projects like flood levees, which are really needed in places like Katherine; cyclone shelters, which are needed throughout the north; and fire breaks and evacuation centres in the Northern Territory and around Australia.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Tony Sheldon Sheldon supports the bill because it creates a dedicated fund for disaster resilience and risk reduction, which he says will help communities prepare before floods, fires and storms become worse disasters.
    “We are committed to better protecting towns—like all of us here—like Eugowra, for people like Greg, Sandra and Mark. We support the bill.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 22 Nov 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  11. Murray Watt Watt supports the bill and says it will replace the former emergency fund with a permanent Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. to finance disaster resilience and mitigation.
    “This bill will implement our election commitment and will replace the former government's failed Emergency Response Fund. In the three years since that fund was established in 2019, with what ended up being $4.8 billion in it, the fund did not build a single disaster mitigation project or release a cent in recovery funding. All it did was earn the former coalition government over $800 million in interest. This legislation will replace this failed fund with a dedicated ongoing natural disaster resilience and risk reduction fund, the Disaster Ready Fund. The Disaster Ready Fund will provide up to $200 million a year, matched where possible by state, territory and local governments, to mitigate the devastating impacts of natural disasters by providing funding for disaster resilience and mitigation activities. Now we are finalising this commitment and delivering on it by writing the Disaster Ready Fund into law.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 22 Nov 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  12. Jess Walsh Jess Walsh supports the bill, saying it will create a proper disaster-ready fund and help Australia prepare for future floods, fires and other extreme weather.
    “In contrast, the Albanese government is getting on with the job of building a better Australia, building a country that's ready to face the future. This bill will ensure that Australia is better prepared for future disasters. It will provide up to $200 million per year to invest in mitigation projects, like flood levees, cyclone shelters, firebreaks and evacuation centres around Australia as well as building natural disaster resilience.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 22 Nov 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  13. Tania Lawrence Lawrence supports the bill and says it will make taxpayer funds available to mitigate disaster risks and protect communities from climate-driven floods and fires.
    “The nature of climate change and where we live means that we face incredible and real risks of natural disasters. Be they floods on the east coast or fires on the west coast, these are matters that we absolutely have to focus on because there is no greater threat to our people, our property and our environment. I'm extremely proud to be part of a government that is now unlocking taxpayer funds that rightfully should be made available to mitigate those risks and to protect our communities.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  14. Andrew Giles Giles supports the bill, saying it will replace the existing Emergency Response FundThe former name of the fund, which the bill keeps in place but repurposes. with a permanent Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. that invests up to $200 million a year in disaster resilience and risk reduction.
    “The bill will implement the government's election commitment to replace the Emergency Response Fund with a dedicating ongoing natural disaster resilience and risk reduction fund, the Disaster Ready Fund. The Disaster Ready Fund will provide up to $200 million a year to mitigate the devastating impacts of natural disasters by providing funding for disaster resilience and mitigation initiatives.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

6 speakers · 5 support · 1 oppose

  1. Perin Davey Davey says the opposition will support the bill, but wants an amendment to improve transparency and accountability in how the disaster mitigation money is spent.
    “The opposition will support this bill. We will be moving an amendment to make it more transparent. We cannot underestimate the current fragility of our rural and regional communities. We pride ourselves on our toughness and our ability to get on with the job, but large parts of Australia are at present struggling and they need to know that we are going to stand by them in both recovery and future mitigation efforts. I implore the government to make sure that, while moving this funding from recovery to mitigation projects, they don't turn their back on the funding that will be required following these floods. In this latest disaster the road infrastructure that needs to be repaired is going to require a significant commitment from the government, so I implore the government not to forget this hard task at hand. We will support the bill with an amendment for this Emergency Response Fund.”

    National Party • Senator • 22 Nov 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Sam Birrell Sam Birrell says the Nationals will support the bill, because they back disaster resilience funding, but he criticises it for lacking detail and transparency about what projects will qualify and how the money will be allocated.
    “I rise to speak in support of this amendment to the Emergency Response Fund Amendment (Disaster Ready Fund) Bill 2022, but I also bring to the debate the personal experience of the past fortnight as my electorate of Nicholls has been ravaged by an unprecedented flood emergency. The Emergency Response Fund was set up by the coalition government in 2019. It was funded by the uncommitted balance of the Education Investment Fund, which was then closed. It was an investment fund intended to grow over time and maximise the Commonwealth's capacity to support states and territories to respond to major natural disasters into the future.”

    National Party • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. James Stevens Stevens says the coalition supports the bill because it will help communities prepare for natural disasters and fund resilience projects, and he urges the House to pass it without dissent.
    “This is an area that we should be working together in. I'm pleased that the coalition is supporting this bill. I respect and support the member for Page's second reading amendment, for the reasons I outlined at the beginning of my contribution. Nonetheless, I think that when it comes to supporting our communities to deal with these significant events that they are going to face in the future we should be doing it with a sense of unity. I anticipate that this will be supported through the parliament without dissent. With those comments I commend the bill to the House.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Kevin Hogan Hogan says the opposition will support the bill, because it keeps the disaster fund but shifts its annual focus to preparedness and risk reduction.
    “While the opposition will be supporting this bill today, we are concerned about the responsible minister's power to increase the maximum disbursement amount by instrument, pushing aside the legislated cap.”

    National Party • MP • 25 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Greens

5 speakers · 2 support · 2 oppose · 1 mixed

  1. Elizabeth Watson-Brown Watson-Brown says the Greens welcome the bill's shift toward disaster mitigation and preparedness, but they think it is far too small and should be backed by much more funding.
    “This bill does propose to repurpose the existing Emergency Response Fund to focus on disaster mitigation and risk reduction, on building resilience and on preparing for future natural disasters. This is welcome. But there is one problem: there's no more money in the fund. It's just shifting the same amount of money from before, from disaster recovery to disaster preparedness.”

    Australian Greens • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. David Shoebridge Shoebridge says the Greens support shifting the fund toward pre-disaster preparedness, but argue this bill still falls far short of what is needed to protect communities from climate-driven disasters.
    “The Australian Greens support the principle of recalibrating the Emergency Response Fund's allocations to pre-disaster preparedness, and I do acknowledge the genuineness of Senator Sheldon and his work in trying to turn the beast around and get preparedness, mitigation and adaptation as public policy and get the funding we need. I acknowledge that; it's genuine work and it's hard work. But this bill does not come close to what is needed to prevent the coal and gas field natural disasters.”

    Australian Greens • Senator • 22 Nov 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Barbara Pocock Barbara Pocock says the Greens support the bill in principle because it shifts money toward disaster preparedness, but they argue it does not spend enough and should be amended to raise the cap and stop the fund investing in fossil fuels.
    “We support the principle of this bill. The government has a duty to keep citizens and communities safe. We should be investing to develop climate disaster resilience and preparedness but this fund does not go far enough. Climate disasters are forecast to increase, and we can see them around us and around the planet. We need to ensure that we have the capacity to support communities by lifting the spending cap from $200 million to 300 million. We also need to require that the disaster fund does not invest in fossil fuels. We cannot have a fund invested in the companies that are responsible for causing the very same climate disasters that the fund is set up to protect against.”

    Australian Greens • Senator • 22 Nov 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Stephen Bates Stephen Bates opposes the bill because he says it is only a rebranding of the existing fund, adds no new money, and does not go far enough to fund real disaster mitigation.
    “This bill is simply a rebranding of the Emergency Response Fund. This bill shifts $150 million set aside for disaster recovery to instead sit with the $50 million spent on public works to minimise the impacts of natural disasters before they hit. There's no new money. Even the Insurance Council of Australia, as my colleague the member for Ryan quoted—and I will quote it again—has stated that we need to spend $30 billion over the next 50 years on large-scale coastal mitigation to protect communities against increasing storm surges, erosion and rising sea levels. That is around $600 million a year. The $200 million a year the government is proposing is not enough, and our communities deserve better. This bill is not spending any new money while it is relying on stock market returns to ensure the fund stays topped up.”

    Australian Greens • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Max Chandler-Mather Chandler-Mather opposes the bill because he says it does not add new disaster funding and instead shifts money away from recovery while the government still backs coal and gas expansion.
    “The frustrating thing is that this bill provides no new money for dealing with natural disasters. It simply shuffles a little bit of extra cash into disaster preparations at the cost of funding for recovery. When the next flood, bushfire or cyclone hits, that clean-up money will have to come from somewhere else.”

    Australian Greens • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

7 speakers · 7 support

  1. Zali Steggall Steggall supports the bill because it shifts disaster spending toward prevention, adaptation and mitigation rather than only recovery.
    “I welcome this bill and the government's commitment to proactive measures of mitigation and adaptation to natural disasters. The impacts of climate change are already baked into our environment, and we need to assess what the risks are, adapt to them and mitigate them as best as possible. Australians know that this is true. We are seeing this on a daily basis with the floods that have been running across the east coast of the country for the past year. I welcome the changes in this legislation, but I urge the government: (1) to develop a plan to conduct regular national climate risk assessments; (2) to develop regular mitigation and adaptation plans in response to those national climate risk assessments; and (3) to consider broadening the definition of natural disasters to include pandemics to provide a shovel-ready tool to distribute funds in the event of future events such as COVID-19.”

    Independent • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Helen Haines Haines supports the bill and says the Disaster Ready FundThe renamed fund that sets aside money for disaster preparedness, resilience and risk reduction instead of mainly paying for recovery. is a good step toward shifting disaster policy from recovery to prevention and mitigation.
    “This bill is a good development, but we do need more. I'd like to see the inclusion of emergency services precincts or emergency operations precincts in eligible projects. These would coordinate emergency and volunteer services efforts and help recruit the much-needed volunteers. Everywhere I go across my electorate, most particularly in the last couple of weeks with the floods, when I speak the SES and the CFA, they tell me that their volunteer numbers are down and those who are left are exhausted. When we talk about resilience funding, we need to make sure that the guidelines enable us to address that as a key problem and to address the fact that multiservice precincts are a great way to go to capitalise on the volunteers that we have got—share resources, share information. I believe those things fit squarely within the resilience aspect of these funds. I know right now Mansfield and Myrtleford are two places that could benefit so greatly from emergency services precincts.”

    Independent • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Sophie Scamps Scamps supports the bill and wants it passed, saying it is a start because it renames the fund, lifts annual spending, and should help communities prepare for disasters.
    “I hope that by passing this bill we provide them with the support they need and deserve. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Independent • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Kate Chaney Chaney supports the bill because it creates dedicated funding for disaster resilience and pre-disaster mitigation, which she says is needed as climate-driven disasters worsen.
    “In conclusion, I support this bill, given that it addresses the specific need to fund disaster resilience efforts, but I strongly urge the government to, firstly, include coastal hazard management in the funding allocated to the Disaster Ready Fund; secondly, review the quantum of the Disaster Ready Fund, given that it represents only 0.5 per cent of the annual cost to the country of natural disasters; and, thirdly, commit to transparency in relation to the allocation of the Disaster Ready Fund, on both the definition of disaster mitigation and the criteria that will be used to prioritise projects.”

    Independent • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Rebekha Sharkie Sharkie supports the bill and says it is a needed shift toward disaster preparedness and risk reduction.
    “It's unclear from the bill how the $200 million per annum will be allocated for natural disaster resilience and risk reduction. I'm pleased that the government has moved from a reactionary to a preparatory footing. This bill is a start. Of course, I support it. I say to members who are experiencing flooding in their electorate now that the hearts of those in my community go out to your communities. I have the end of the River Murray in my electorate and I know that many in South Australia are beginning to hold their breath as we see the River Murray waters continue further downstream. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Centre Alliance • MP • 27 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Zoe Daniel Zoe Daniel supports the bill as a step in the right direction because it helps fund disaster resilience and risk reduction, but she says it is only a small start compared with the scale of the damage and the need for better coordination and preparedness.
    “This legislation is a step in the right direction, but the money versus the cost of the damage is just a drop in the warming ocean. It's a reminder, too, of how much more there is to be done.”

    Independent • MP • 26 Oct 2022

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat