Economic and regional job risk
Opponents argued the bill could drive policy that undermines coal, gas, resources and related regional jobs, while also weakening investment and making the energy system less reliable or more expensive.
This bill became law on Sep 13th, 2022.
Climate, energy & environment
Australia now has climate targets in federal law to cut net greenhouse gas emissions 43% below 2005 levels by 2030, using both a 2030 end-point and a running 2021 to 2030 carbon budgetThe total amount of net greenhouse gas emissions Australia can emit across 2021 to 2030 and still stay on track for the 2030 target..
Australia had updated its Paris climate pledge in June 2022, but the new 43% by 2030 and net zeroA point where the greenhouse gases Australia adds are balanced by the amount removed, so overall net emissions are zero. by 2050 targets were not yet in Australian law. This bill locks those targets into federal law and requires yearly public reporting, expert advice and periodic reviews to track progress.
Australia had been operating under an earlier Paris target, and although the new Albanese government updated Australia’s pledge in June 2022 to cut emissions 43 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 and reach net zeroA point where the greenhouse gases Australia adds are balanced by the amount removed, so overall net emissions are zero. by 2050, those commitments were not yet written into federal law. The bill responded by locking the new targets into law and adding annual public reporting, advice from the Climate Change AuthorityAn independent national body that gives expert advice under this law on Australia’s climate progress and on future emissions targets. and future statutory reviews, and after Parliament passed it those obligations became part of Australia’s ongoing climate policy architecture.
The strongest criticism was that locking a 43 per cent emissions cut into law could force costly or rigid policy choices that hurt regional jobs, industry investment and electricity reliability without clearly showing the real economic trade-offs. That case was mainly pushed by Coalition opponents and One Nation, while some crossbench supporters raised a narrower criticism that the bill set targets and reporting rules but still lacked a stronger or more detailed path to deliver them.
Hon Chris Bowen MP introduced this bill. It passed with support from Labor, Greens, Jacqui Lambie Network, some crossbench members; opposed by Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, UAP, some crossbench members.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 13 Sept 2022
Final passage
Recorded final vote
1 counted final-passage vote was recorded.
Passage speed
48 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Australia now has climate targets in federal law to cut net greenhouse gas emissions 43% below 2005 levels by 2030, using both a 2030 end-point and a running 2021 to 2030 carbon budgetThe total amount of net greenhouse gas emissions Australia can emit across 2021 to 2030 and still stay on track for the 2030 target..
Australia now has a net zeroA point where the greenhouse gases Australia adds are balanced by the amount removed, so overall net emissions are zero. by 2050 target in federal law, giving governments, industry and investors a clear long-term direction.
The climate minister must table a yearly statement in Parliament covering progress on emissions targets, policy results, effects on rural and regional Australia, and climate risks such as harm to health, farming and national security.
Future Australian emissions targets under the Paris AgreementThe global climate treaty that Australia has joined, which is the basis for the targets and advice rules described on this page. cannot be set for 2035, 2040 or 2045 without advice from the Climate Change AuthorityAn independent national body that gives expert advice under this law on Australia’s climate progress and on future emissions targets., unless the minister decides an urgent update is needed after consulting it.
The law requires independent reviews of how the Act is working, with public consultation, the first review within 5 years and later reviews every 10 years.
(a) reducing Australia’s net greenhouse gas emissions to 43% below 2005 levels by 2030:Climate Change Act 2022 final Act text
(b) reducing Australia’s net greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050.Climate Change Act 2022 final Act text
(1) Within 6 months after the end of each financial year, the Minister must prepare a statement that relates to:Climate Change Act 2022 final Act text
(2A) The Commonwealth must only communicate a new nationally determined contribution in accordance with Article 4 of the Paris Agreement that first includes a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2035, 2040 or 2045 if:Climate Change Act 2022 final Act text
This clause requires the Minister to arrange for periodic independent reviews of the operation of the Act. The first review is to be completed within 5 years after commencement of this section, and subsequent reviews within 10 years after the completion of the previous review. The intent of such a review is to consider the content and operation of the Act and not consider the appropriateness of the targets themselves.Climate Change explanatory memorandum
Context
Australia had been operating under an earlier Paris target, and although the new Albanese government updated Australia’s pledge in June 2022 to cut emissions 43 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 and reach net zeroA point where the greenhouse gases Australia adds are balanced by the amount removed, so overall net emissions are zero. by 2050, those commitments were not yet written into federal law. The bill responded by locking the new targets into law and adding annual public reporting, advice from the Climate Change AuthorityAn independent national body that gives expert advice under this law on Australia’s climate progress and on future emissions targets. and future statutory reviews, and after Parliament passed it those obligations became part of Australia’s ongoing climate policy architecture.
Australia updates its Paris climate pledge to 43 per cent by 2030
The new government replaced the previous 26 to 28 per cent target with a 43 per cent 2030 target and a net zeroA point where the greenhouse gases Australia adds are balanced by the amount removed, so overall net emissions are zero. by 2050 commitment, but those settings were still not yet in legislation.
User-provided bill context ↗Government introduces the Climate Change Bill 2022
The bill was introduced to write the updated emissions targets into federal law and begin a statutory system of annual reporting and expert advice.
Parliamentary timeline ↗House passes the bill with amendments
The House agreed to the bill in principle, accepted a package of non-government amendments and completed its passage through the chamber.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Parliament passes the bill
After Senate amendments were agreed and the House accepted the Senate message, both chambers settled the bill in the same form.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Climate targets become law after Royal AssentThe final formal approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act.
Royal AssentThe final formal approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. turned the bill into an Act, making the 2030 and 2050 targets and the new annual reporting and review requirements part of Commonwealth law.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Referred to Committee (28/07/2022): Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee; Committee report (31/08/2022)
Referred to committee
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber. Later message exchanges with the other chamber were still recorded afterwards.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Recorded vote: 36 to 30.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Committee of the Whole debate
Recorded vote: 37 to 30.
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Consideration of Senate message
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe final formal approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
The strongest criticism was that locking a 43 per cent emissions cut into law could force costly or rigid policy choices that hurt regional jobs, industry investment and electricity reliability without clearly showing the real economic trade-offs. That case was mainly pushed by Coalition opponents and One Nation, while some crossbench supporters raised a narrower criticism that the bill set targets and reporting rules but still lacked a stronger or more detailed path to deliver them.
Most criticism focused on economic risk or whether the bill was strong and detailed enough, not on rejecting climate policy altogether.
Economic and regional job risk
Opponents argued the bill could drive policy that undermines coal, gas, resources and related regional jobs, while also weakening investment and making the energy system less reliable or more expensive.
Targets without enough cost detail
Critics said the bill mainly legislated the target itself and did not adequately spell out the cost, regulatory impact or promised household benefits, leaving major economic questions unanswered.
Too weak and not backed by a full delivery plan
Some supporters said the bill was only a first step because it set a minimum target and reporting framework but did not itself provide a strong enough plan for faster cuts, fossil fuel phase-down or support for affected workers and communities.
Further sources
Votes
The chamber-passage votes come first. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Passed 37 to 30. Support came from Labor, Jacqui Lambie Network, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, and UAP. One cross-floor vote was recorded: Penny Allman-Payne (Greens) voted no. Greens had split recorded votes. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
Earlier bill-stage votes
Passed 36 to 30. Support came from Labor, Jacqui Lambie Network, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, and UAP. One cross-floor vote was recorded: Penny Allman-Payne (Greens) voted no. Greens had split recorded votes. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.
House
The APH progress record says 9 Non-Government amendments were agreed without a counted division being collected by this run.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The House agreed to the amendments made by the Senate, so the bill could pass both chambers in the same form.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Senate
Defeated 13 to 41. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, Nationals, and Jacqui Lambie Network. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The amendment was defeated, so the Senate gave the bill a second reading without adding that criticism and call for tougher fossil fuel limits.
Defeated 13 to 40. Support came from minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, Nationals, and Jacqui Lambie Network. One cross-floor vote was recorded: Penny Allman-Payne (Greens) voted no. Greens had split recorded votes. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The amendment was defeated, so the Senate gave the bill a second reading without adding that criticism and call for tougher fossil fuel limits.
Moved by David Pocock (Independent). Passed 37 to 26. Support came from Labor, Jacqui Lambie Network, One Nation, UAP, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party and Nationals. One cross-floor vote was recorded: Penny Allman-Payne (Greens) voted no. Greens had split recorded votes. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The proposed change was agreed.
Moved by Malcolm Roberts (Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party). Defeated 3 to 45. Support came from One Nation and UAP. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Liberal Party, Jacqui Lambie Network, and minor parties and independents.
The amendment was defeated, so the Senate rejected that critique and proceeded to the main second-reading question without adding it to the motion.
Moved by David Pocock (Independent). Defeated 15 to 47. Support came from Jacqui Lambie Network and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, Nationals, and One Nation. One cross-floor vote was recorded: Penny Allman-Payne (Greens) voted no. Greens had split recorded votes. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The amendments were defeated, so the bill was not expanded to cover scope 3 progress reporting or that extra scientific explanation requirement.
Moved by David Pocock (Independent). Defeated 5 to 51. Support came from Jacqui Lambie Network, One Nation, UAP, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, Greens, and Nationals. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The amendment was defeated, so the bill kept its lighter reporting framework without mandatory policy-by-policy cost-benefit analysis.
Moved by David Pocock (Independent). Defeated 30 to 33. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, Jacqui Lambie Network, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor and minor parties and independents. One cross-floor vote was recorded: Penny Allman-Payne (Greens) voted aye. Greens had split recorded votes. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The amendment was narrowly defeated, so the bill did not gain a standing Productivity CommissionAn independent government research body that can be asked to examine the economic effects of climate targets and related policies. review process for future target setting.
Moved by David Pocock (Independent). Defeated 17 to 40. Support came from Jacqui Lambie Network, One Nation, UAP, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, and Nationals. One cross-floor vote was recorded: Penny Allman-Payne (Greens) voted no. Greens had split recorded votes. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The amendment was defeated, so the bill did not add a budget-style forward reporting system for the emissions effects of Commonwealth fiscal decisions.
The APH progress record says 5 Independent amendments were agreed without a counted division being collected by this run.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
This list includes amendment votes, procedural votes and votes on the bill itself.
The parliamentary record also shows 9 Non-Government amendments and 5 Independent amendments agreed without a counted division.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Bowen strongly supports the bill and says it is an important first step that sets legally binding emissions targets, improves accountability, and gives investors policy certainty.
Read in Hansard ↗Matthew Canavan opposes the bill, arguing it is unnecessary, costly and likely to lock Australia into damaging climate targets that hurt jobs, energy prices and manufacturing.
Read in Hansard ↗Waters says the Greens will support the bill, but only as a weak first step, and argues it falls far short of what climate science requires.
Read in Hansard ↗Steggall supports the Climate Change Bill 2022 and wants it passed, saying it is important progress toward genuine climate action and can help drive confidence and investment.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
36 speakers · 37 contributions · 36 support
“The Bill is a solid foundation, setting clearly and firmly, in Australian law, Australia's emissions reduction ambitions. It holds the government of the day accountable to the Australian parliament and the Australian people, on how it measures up to those ambitions, and how it is addressing this fundamental issue.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I urge every member of this house to get behind this bill and support this. It is well past time that Australia put in legislation our deep commitment to achieving these targets, and I think that's something that every member of this house would want to be a part of.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill represents an opportunity for this parliament and for our country.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill achieves that, and I'm incredibly proud to speak in support of it today.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Quite simply, the Australian people want stronger action on climate change, and that is exactly what this bill will deliver.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The passage of this bill would be a landmark day for climate action in Australia. The government is proud of this legislation. It's a demonstration of our commitment to ambitious action on climate change, to transparency and to accountability on this defining issue of our time.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Josh Burns on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Burns strongly supports the Climate Change Bill 2022 and says it will put Australia on a pathway to net zeroA point where the greenhouse gases Australia adds are balanced by the amount removed, so overall net emissions are zero. with clearer targets, stronger institutions, and proper accountability. He argues it is needed to end the climate wars and deliver economic benefits as well as climate action.
“This is good reform. It is sensible reform. It is reform that the Australian people demanded. It is reform I am really proud of. It is reform that we can all be proud of: that we stood in this place and took a gigantic step forward on climate action. Australians said, 'We want to end the climate wars,' and they're over. Instead of bickering and denial and complete obfuscation, we have a bill—a bill in this place that says Australia is on a pathway towards net zero, and that is the law of this nation. That is something that I am extremely proud to be a part of.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Burns supports the Climate Change Bill and says it is a major step forward that will lock in emissions targets, give the private sector certainty, and steer government funding toward the clean energy transition. He criticises the opposition for standing aside from climate action and says they are voting against the bill’s practical push for a cleaner future.
“The climate change bill makes some significant legislative changes. The first one is to legislate our emissions reduction targets as part of our nationally determined commitments. We are giving certainty to the private sector, which is saying, 'We want the investment of trillions of dollars into renewable energy and into cheap, clean energy with dispatchable power.' We are saying clearly that we want that in Australia and that there is certainty in the market, and that is what the legislation provides.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“This bill delivers on our election commitment to Australians to restore national leadership on climate change. The bill is long overdue. It's an opportunity for parliament to end the climate was and affirm a national commitment to net zero emission targets. I thank the Minister for Climate Change and Energy for introducing this significant legislation.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This legislation is only the beginning, the first step for us in implementing the Powering Australia plan that we took to the Australian people at the May election. These bills set in law our emission reduction ambitions and represent a solid, reliable and dependable foundation from which to build further efforts to reduce our carbon emissions.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Australians have been on a very long journey to get us to where this chamber is today. These bills will enshrine the nation's commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 43 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 and to get us to net zero by 2050. Labor's commitment will become law.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I campaigned hard on Labor's climate change policy in my electorate. I talked about the climate emergency and reducing emissions, and a cleaner, better future. I talked about the employment opportunities that will come from becoming a renewable energy superpower. I talked about the fact that we can have a modern economy and be part of changing the course of the future for the better. And that's what my community voted for. That's what they voted for, and that's what this legislation will deliver.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“What a momentous day. I could not be more proud to stand here tonight in support of the Climate Change Bill 2022. After a decade of inaction, we might finally see our country start to seize on all the opportunities our transition to a renewable energy future has to offer. We will finally take meaningful action to address climate change.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So I implore senators to support this bill today.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Now, as one of our first acts in parliament, we are introducing our Climate Change Bill. This seeks to enshrine in law our nationally determined contribution of 43 per cent emissions reduction by 2030 and net zero emissions by 2050. This target is a floor, not a ceiling, and it has been backed in by representatives of business and unions, energy users and energy providers, farmers and conservationists. The bill will also explicitly task in law the Climate Change Authority to assess and publish progress against these targets, and advise government of future targets, including the 2035 target. It will legislate a requirement for the minister for climate change to report annually to parliament on its progress. Legislating the target is international best practice. It creates the much-needed certainty for business, investors and the wider community. It also will see Australia rejoin key trading partners in their ambition to 2030. For example, Canada has a target of 40 to 45 per cent; South Korea, 40 per cent; and Japan, 46 per cent. Most importantly, the 43 per cent target is backed by a plan. We know we can reach it because of the modelled impact of a comprehensive set of policies.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I look forward to these changes because they are necessary, despite the fear mongering that we will unfortunately continue to hear in this debate. This is not a balanced thing between imposts on the one hand and benefits on the other. The benefits run in both directions. There are enormous economic benefits, job benefits and pollution reduction benefits as well as climate benefits. So I support this bill wholeheartedly, and I thank the young people of Australia for their patience.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“With this bill, our Labor government is making it clear that climate change is one of our biggest priorities. We will not let the chance to tackle climate change slip us by. We will not let the chance to create the jobs and the industries of the future slip us by. We will feel the responsibility that we have, to this generation and future generations, to act on climate change. We are showing that from the very start of this 47th Parliament we will close the door on the past decade of inaction. I sincerely hope the climate wars have ended, because we need our country to be able to work together to fully embrace action on climate change and fully embrace the transformation to our economy that will come with that. It's on that basis that I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The legislation that we have before us is good. It's good for the country, good for the economy and good for young people. We know young people are taking action in their everyday lives to address climate change. Now they finally have a government that will take action alongside them. Today, being part of a government legislating the Climate Change Bill feels momentous, years in the making and fought for by so many. It is important that we talk about young people because they have been on the front line of the chorus call for change. I know myself, with two young children, 21 and 17, the work they have been advocating for to ensure that we get to this day, that this day has finally come.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is a serious issue, as I said, and we need to make sure that this bill gets through. I'm really disappointed to hear, again, the games that are being played by the opposition, as they were in 2008 during the Rudd government when we had a proposal on the table. As I said, having a stable, clear and coherent policy sends a vital message to the private sector, and that is really important. It sends a message also to the world that Australia is back as a good global citizen. It sends a message that Australia now has a government and a parliament that wants Australia to be a renewable energy powerhouse.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The global momentum for renewables due to decarbonisation is now unstoppable. Governments, markets and communities must work together to this end. This is what this bill will achieve. This bill will put Australia on track for net zero by 2050. No ifs and buts; it will happen. Our Powering Australia plan, which we took to the election, will deliver 604,000 jobs across the country and bring on 82 per cent renewables by 2030. While legislation is not essential to deliver Powering Australia, the Albanese government regards enshrining our national, determined contribution in law as best practice. This bill will proudly bring Australia into line with countries, such as France, Denmark and Spain, which have legislated net zero targets by 2050. Countries such as Canada have also legislated their 2030 targets.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Neither households nor businesses can continue to function in a climate of uncertainty. Personal and business investments will only be made when there is long-term stability and predictability. That is what this legislation seeks to do. It will begin a responsible transition to a lower emissions economy that will generate investments in new technology, in new jobs. It will be less destructive to our natural environment and contribute to global efforts to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“On election day, Australians voted to end the climate wars; they had had enough. Our Prime Minister spoke eloquently of the possibility of a better future, the potential of a better future, and now this parliament can do the same. We can vote to end the decade of delay and denial. We can vote to mark the end of our climate delinquency. We can vote for our children and our grandchildren to have that better future. We can vote for real action.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The legislation sets an interim target of a 43 per cent cut in emissions by 2030, and we know we can achieve a 43 per cent cut because it's the outcome predicted by the modelling of our climate change policies. Reaching this target will get Australia well on the way to our ultimate target, also enshrined in these bills, of net zero emissions by 2050. The 43 per cent target, mind you, is a floor and not a ceiling. We can be more ambitious if the circumstances call for it. In addition to these two emissions reduction targets, the bills now before the Senate will provide for an annual statement to parliament from the minister responsible for climate change. The statement will include an update on Australia's progress towards meeting our emissions targets. The bill will also restore the Climate Change Authority to provide independent expert advice to the minister on the annual statement and to provide advice on any new or updated emissions reduction targets to be communicated to the UN under the Paris Agreement.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Passing this legislation will send a great message to the people of Australia—that we are taking real action on climate change, that the decade of inaction and denial is over, and that Australia is out of the naughty corner in international forums and is once again engaging with the global community, who understand the importance of acting on climate change and understand that this is not just an environmental issue but the biggest economic transformation that we will see globally in our lifetime—as big and as significant as the Industrial Revolution.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It is with pleasure that I get to stand in this chamber of the Australian parliament this evening to speak on Labor's Climate Change Bill 2022, because this is the first real climate action bill in years that this parliament has seen. It's a bill that we're actually going to get to vote on. It is a first step in implementing the Albanese government's mandate and the policy, Powering Australia, that we took to the election. Australia has been crying out for action on climate change, and on 21 May the Australian people voted for change. They rejected the Morrison-Joyce government's refusal to take action on climate change, the blatant disregard for science and the brutal climate wars that prevented any real action on climate change for more than a decade.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“At the May election, the Australian people voted resoundingly in favour of action on climate change, and our government promised we would take it. We would do the work required to lower emissions while continuing to invest in communities, create jobs, improve energy security and make Australia a global leader on climate action instead of an embarrassment. Before us today is the bill that gets this work under way. After a decade of denials, delays and chaos on renewables and energy, our bill, this bill before us, this Labor bill, finally gives business, industry, energy investors and our wider community the certainty it so desperately needs.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The bills are straightforward, positive and powerful. They reflect Australia's obligations under the Paris Agreement, and so I urge the members of this chamber to pass this legislation and to send a clear and positive message to the people of Australia, and to the world, that we are taking real action on climate change.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is a bill that delivers on the government's commitment to restore national leadership on climate change. It provides the certainty and confidence needed to drive the transition to net zero by 2050.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Yes, Australia has a relatively small effect on global emissions but it is an effect that can be reduced and we should, like a good world neighbour, do the right thing and introduce adequate climate policy, which this government is doing by introducing the Climate Change Bill 2022 and the Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill sends the signal that the Albanese government is committed to action on climate change—a signal that gives certainty to our region, to investors, to Australian businesses, and to this parliament—because this bill is also a commitment that our government will not just announce a target and hope we get there. We won't use accounting tricks or rely on future technologies that may or may not ever exist. We will be held accountable to our targets, and we will deliver our plan to not just meet them but exceed them.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The bill itself delivers on the government's election commitment to restore national leadership on climate change by legislating our targets to reduce Australia's greenhouse gas emissions by 43 per cent on 2005 figures by 2030 and to net zero by 2050.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I urge everyone in this chamber to support these bills. They are a simple, strong framework to start taking action. We cannot ignore or deny climate change. This is happening, and if we do not act on climate change our wildlife, our planet, our industry and our citizens will all suffer. I urge everyone to support these bills.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So I am very proud to be standing here in only our second week of parliament debating one of the most important pieces of legislation that this parliament will deal with. We are taking swift action to legislate on the commitment that we made to the Australian people—and the commitment that I made to the people of Macquarie.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Today is my son's birthday. He is 31. I'm standing tonight to speak on Labor's Climate Change Bill 2022. When my youngest son was 15, I had enormous hope that we were going to do something about climate change. My three sons had enormous hope that, as a country, we were locked into a future that would see us take the lead internationally. It's been a long road—an enormously long road—and we're here tonight because it's the right thing to do. It's the responsible thing to do. We're back with the good global citizens who take responsibility. We become part of the solution. It has been a long journey.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill is what the people of Perth have been calling for. This bill is what the people of Perth have sent me to vote for. This bill, and the policies within it, I've consulted on with the now minister in forums in my electorate, and I'm proud to support this legislation becoming the law of Australia.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I strongly welcome this bill. I welcome the Labor government's genuine commitment to taking urgent yet considered action on reducing emissions and steering this capable and innovative nation to a strong economy based on renewable energy. I also urge us to remain true to our equally strong commitment to social justice. Transition is necessary but must always be managed in a way that doesn't leave disadvantaged communities behind. I believe the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, whose electorate is not unlike my own, has a thorough understanding of the issues of equity. Justice, equity and climate change are the three most urgent and pressing issues of our time, and I support the bill as the first step amongst many that this government will pursue to tackle these issues.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“But the truth is that we need all aspects of the economy to do their fair amount of work, and that's what this bill does.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
25 speakers · 26 contributions · 1 support · 24 oppose
“I'm going to have to finish my speech here, but can I just say I will vote against this bill because it is junk science. It has been based on false lies for far too long, and I will continue to fight this to the day I die.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill, sadly, is worse than it seems—both these bills—and I warn senators to consider carefully before they cast their vote. We will oppose this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In closing, and I know we have a long night ahead of us because, again, in transparency we are going to push this through and maybe guillotine it at some stage, we won't be supporting these bills because we support Australians. They are founded upon unachievable policy principles, and they will have very, very serious unintended consequences.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I cannot support this legislation. I would hope that the government would, at the bare minimum, consider passing an amendment that would see the Productivity Commission review the legislation and its impact on our nation, that it would do it regularly and that it allows for a pause to be set—as we're seeing is happening in the UK, in Germany, in Europe.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“From my perspective as a proud National Party senator and a regional Australian, this bill fails to take into account the impact that legislating the target will have on regional Australia. It fails to appreciate that there are some Australians, some industries, which will be disproportionately impacted by this compared to others.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“My last point, point 10: nuclear energy. We are seeing, as I mentioned earlier, that Japan is moving back towards reconsidering nuclear. If we are going to adopt this focus in replacing our fossil fuels, we need to look at base power stable energy production. We need to be considering nuclear. It is irresponsible for us to not consider nuclear yet, again, this isn't dealt with in this legislation. So on that basis I will not be supporting these bills.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In summary, the most recent science from recognised global experts refutes the assumptions underpinning the Albanese government's plan that increased investment in variable renewables will deliver abundant cheap power while reducing emissions to net zero. The science highlights that there is a solution. But the point is: we will never know what is possible and effective for Australia unless the prohibition on nuclear power generation is lifted. Australians should demand effective policy that is transparently based on all available evidence. This will only be possible if the government acts to repeal the outdated, ideologically driven barriers to evaluating the option of nuclear power generation. If Australia is serious about achieving net zero while still having affordable, reliable power, with minimal impact on our people and our land, our focus should be more on targeting legislation than on legislating targets.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In summary—look, it is not true that the majority position of the G20 countries is to legislate a target. The Parliamentary Library itself has said that 12 of the 20 countries have not legislated a target. Having said that, I don't think it's necessarily the end of the world if you do it. The point I've made in these remarks is that the key legislative component here, even though it is international law, is done through the NDC, so whatever you do here is simply superfluous. If I was the minister for energy and climate change, or if I was a minister for any portfolio, I would not be describing my own legislation as 'not necessary'. Why would we, as a parliament, enact a bill that the minister has said is unnecessary. I don't think that's our job.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Without a doubt, the transition to net zero is inevitable; however, this legislation, the Climate Change Bill 2022 and related bill, is unnecessary and unachievable. The world is moving towards producing carbon neutral energy, and this is a good thing. The globe will at some point in time reach net zero, and I would say ideally sooner rather than later. However, given at the Paris accords rules, Australia already cannot walk back our NDC for 2030, even if anyone actually wanted to, and the government knows this. So the bill before us today is a redundant piece of legislation.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Ted O'Brien on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Ted O'Brien opposes the Climate Change Bill 2022, arguing that the target is already set under the Paris AgreementThe global climate treaty that Australia has joined, which is the basis for the targets and advice rules described on this page. and that the bill itself creates harmful constraints on government decisions. He says it overreaches by inviting green lawfare and weakening flexibility for key agencies and investments.
“The issue is with the legislation itself. The Prime Minister and his Minister for Climate Change and Energy in rushing to introduce this to the parliament haven't thought through the second and third broader consequences of the legislation. Experience overseas shows that when you legislate emissions reduction targets, you risk handing control over projects, not targets, to activists—otherwise known in some spheres as green lawfare.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Ted O'Brien says the coalition will not support the bill because it threatens energy security, national security, jobs and the economy, and he argues Labor has ignored the price and community impacts. He says the coalition supports cutting emissions in principle, but not with this legislation.
“The coalition, at the end of the day, will not support legislation that puts our energy and national security at risk or our economy.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“After reviewing Labor's legislation I've spent a lot of time deciding how to proceed. I believe there are issues with the Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022. I will not be supporting this bill, due to my concerns over the impact it may have on important infrastructure projects, for example. However, I will be supporting Labor's Climate Change Bill 2022. At the end of the day, it's important to me that when I'm back in my own community I'm able to sincerely say that I used the opportunity afforded to me with the power of my vote to stand up for what they want and need and to move on from this debate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“All I am saying is that we want to see our response be proportional to our contribution. We cannot continue to destroy the things that deliver jobs into our regions, and that is what is now being proposed.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Those who have introduced and supported this bill need to understand that they're dooming Australia to a high-energy-cost future, a future in which Australians must choose between heating and eating. One only needs to look at the bleak winter fast approaching in the Northern Hemisphere to see our future right there before us. Power bills will become 500 to 600 times the cost, with energy shortages and businesses going under. It's all on the watch of those who support this bill, and we won't let you forget. We've been blessed with a natural environment with bountiful resources that can allow us to reduce the cost of living and become less dependent on foreign powers. I hope that, as a nation, we can become alert to the urgency not of climate change but of pushing a rational energy policy. It's time for those in this place to reject this bill. It's time for those in this place to put Australia first.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I am very disappointed that this has become a political point-scoring exercise instead of a genuine opportunity for the government to be focused on implementing the policies that they took to the last election to achieve the targets that they laid out. This bill doesn't have anything to do with that, and they should be focused on implementing their policies, particularly the cost saving in their policy of $275 a year on household electricity bills.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Tomorrow morning, this bill will proceed. It is a goal without a plan, giving the regions fear but not hope. We will be told we have to honour the percentage of science that affirms the views of those opposite whilst ignoring the science that they don't agree with. Essentially, that is what this bill is—what I stated at the beginning and came from the mouths of some opposite: a bill that is largely symbolic or, as the minister responsible said, a bill that is not required. Why are we doing this?”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In December 2021 Labor made a promise to cut power bills. We were approaching election time. We were all wondering when the election might or might not be called. Whilst Labor made this promise—they said that they would cut power bills whilst reducing emissions—these bills only legislate one of those targets. That promise to reduce household power bills by $275 by 2025 is the first broken promise of this government. It is a fallacy. They won't do that.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Going to the legislation—the Climate Change Bill 2022 and related bill—this is absolutely a triumph of politics over policy. The Prime Minister and minister have made very, very clear in repeated statements that this legislation is not necessary. It is entirely the government's right to set their targets, and they have done that. That work has been done. Targets have been set. Nothing that we debate here will change that or impact on that.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I say that this legislation is going to change nothing. It will make you poorer. You are going to pay for this. Every time you buy your fuel, you will pay for climate policy. Every time you buy your groceries, you will pay for climate policy. Every time you get your power bill, you most definitely will be paying for climate policy. And this legislation is going to make it worse. You are going to become poorer still. And because of this, the temperature of the globe will stay exactly where it is at the moment.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I conclude that legislating this target is no more than a bit of political grandstanding, a bit of politics within the warm inner glow. The minister has said that the government does not need to legislate, so why would we risk stranding Australia, like a shag on a rock, while the world changes around us? By all means let us strive for the 43 per cent—let's go further—but only on the basis that we are not that shag on the rock, that we do not rush ahead of the evolving technologies before they are mature enough to give us low-cost transmission that will protect our jobs, our economy and our place in the world.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I hear those opposite say regularly that the 43 per cent reduction is a plan. The 43 per cent isn't a plan; it's a target. It's a target, by the way, that doesn't have to be legislated, because the government has already signed up to it. The government has already signed up, so there's no need for this legislation. The worst part about this legislation is that there is no plan attached—zero. There is nothing in this legislation that creates a plan to achieve that 43 per cent reduction. As I look at what—”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Investments in renewable energy generation, solar and wind, have already put Australia in a very precarious position regarding electrical energy security. Prices are escalating rapidly to the serious detriment of our economy. We once had cheap electricity, and now we have amongst the most expensive electricity in the world. Legislating for an even more aggressive pursuit of a flawed strategy will give rent-seekers and activists the leverage to make the situation worse by compelling the private sector to make wrong decisions. Moreover, we have denied ourselves the rational alternatives, including HELE coal-fired power stations, access to enormous natural gas reserves and nuclear power generation. Australia cannot return to low inflation rates, greater industrial self-reliance and reduced costs of living without reliable, low-cost energy that is achievable by utilising our abundant resources.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“What you do first shows what's important to you, and in one of their first pieces of legislation before this House they are fixing a target that cannot be met except by sacrificing the prospects and prosperity of ordinary working Australians.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to speak on the Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022. I do not support this bill. But please do not assume, because I am standing here today to speak against this bill, that I do not agree with taking serious action on climate change and reducing Australia's contribution to global emissions. I do.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“But, to give them credit, they said they would have a target of 43 per cent, so they're legislating it. They've already written off to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and that is our target. So this legislation is a bit of symbolism, but I find it's pretty sinister in that, yet again, this legislation means that this room and our elected representatives will have no control over investments in things that keep our nation running.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
14 speakers · 15 contributions · 13 support · 1 mixed
“So, through our negotiations, we've improved a weak climate bill. It's still weak, and it's still nowhere near enough, but it is a small step in the right direction, and the Greens will vote for it. But I will say that we are in solidarity with First Nations communities, with climate scientists, with the global community and with our neighbours in the Pacific in saying that this is the critical decade, and we are resolute that there must be no new coal and gas and a transition off fossil fuels.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In summary, this legislation is a start; it's a beginning. But so much more needs to be done. I urge the government to work with us Greens to do the real work that's required for Australia to be playing our part in tackling the climate crisis.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill, with the ratchet mechanism negotiated by the Greens, might—and I stress 'might'—represent the beginning of a genuine approach towards the deep and urgent emissions reductions that Australia needs. But that all depends on the government's steps over the next three years. Will Labor continue to back new coal and gas and wipe out even the lowball emissions reductions of 43 per cent? Will they continue to listen to their fossil fuel corporate donors handing them billions in public money? Or will they back everyday people? Will they back our grandkids and their grandkids? The current rhetoric from the government does not give one a lot of hope. But what does give one hope is that everyday Australians do want change. This election showed it. Whether politicians in this building like it or not, they must make that change, or the Australian people will replace them with people who are willing to do so.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“While the government has been unwilling to adopt science-based targets and place a moratorium on new coal and gas, we have been able to secure improvements to the bill—ensuring that the target can be ratcheted up over time and that it's now 'Dutton-proofed' with a genuine floor, which means the target cannot go backwards. Changes have also been made to put in place greater transparency and accountability and strengthen requirements on the Climate Change Authority. Government agencies, such as Export Finance Australia, that in the past have funded coal and gas projects will, for the first time, be forced to take climate targets into account, which would see them curbed from supporting fossil fuels. They join a range of other agencies with new limits, including Infrastructure Australia and the Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility. That is why we will vote for this bill tomorrow and we will vote for it in the Senate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I'm going to pinch my nose and vote for these bills. But mark my words: the Greens are not going to settle for something that's simply better than nothing. We won't be settling for this. We will push Labor all the way. We will push them in relation to their blind addiction to fossil fuels. We will push them in relation to their blind addiction to logging native forests in this country.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“By supporting this bill as put to us in the house, particularly in the absence of the critical amendments that we have tabled in this chamber, the Greens have shown our willingness to work with the parliament on this issue in the interests of just bloody getting on with it, of clearing a path for all of us to engage in the real work that must follow.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We've improved a weak bill, but, of course, when you're fighting the coal and gas industry and their political representatives, you don't win overnight. Australia remains the third-largest exporter of fossil fuels in the world, and, with 114 new coal and gas projects in the pipeline, it's only going to get worse.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Supporting this bill is a first step towards that. I'm glad to see some action on the most pressing issue of our time, but what we really need to do is stop new coal and gas. As long as we keep opening new coalmines and new gas fields, we are making the climate crisis worse. The Greens will keep pushing the government to take this step, which is crucial for the survival of all of us and our planet—and we cannot lose hope. What gives me hope is that people from across this country, and especially young people, are motivated and are ready to fight. They know that this is not the end of the road for addressing climate change; it is just the beginning. We have many battles ahead of us, and much of the hill still to climb. We need a moratorium on new coal and gas projects. We need to put people before the profits of BHP and Santos. We need to end the billions in taxpayer handouts that the fossil fuel industry receives. The real fight starts now. Climate activists are ready. Young people are ready. The community is ready, and we are ready.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“After a decade of climate stupor by the Liberal and National governments, this bill does represent some progress. It is a small step in the right direction, but, after a decade of coalition ruin, Australia is in such a state of despair when it comes to the climate that even the smallest step is quite notable. But it's not near enough to the solution that we need. No government should be let off the hook on climate action. It's vital that the media, activists, NGOs and the community at large do not let the Labor government rest until we see real climate action.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill represents a first step. It's not enough. We need to move faster and further than this bill allows. The ratchet mechanism secured by the Greens means the target can be increased over time and won't go backwards, but we need more. We've already reached one degree of warming. South Australians and people across our country and the world are already experiencing the effects of this, including loss of livelihoods and lives.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I want to be absolutely clear that the climate wars are not over. They have, in fact, reached a new frontier. The Greens are begrudgingly supporting this bill, but we know that 43 per cent is nowhere near enough. The fight continues for meaningful climate action, which also means preventing one more fossil-fuel project opening, expanding or continuing. My call to action for the folks out there watching is to join us—come forward and fight for our children's future and for our climate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Yes, let's pass this bill with the improvements that have been negotiated through the hard work of climate activists. I particularly pay tribute to our colleague Adam Bandt, our Greens leader, for the hard work he and his team did in negotiating improvements: putting in a genuine floor, putting in greater transparency, making the bill better. But we acknowledge that this is nowhere near where this parliament needs to be on climate. Let's do it, because it shows we can at least take one step away from the climate vandalism of the former coalition government. Let's take some strength from that, but then let's get on with the real work that's needed, and that's the work to permanently keep coal and gas in the ground.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Sarah Hanson-Young on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Hanson-Young supports the Climate Change Bill 2022 and says the Greens helped strengthen it into an acceptable step forward. She argues it still lacks the mechanisms needed to cut pollution, especially a climate trigger to stop new fossil-fuel projects.
“I rise today to speak in favour of these pieces of legislation, and I want to put squarely on the record right from the beginning that it is because the Greens have worked constructively that we have been able to improve and strengthen these pieces of legislation so they are acceptable. Forty-three per cent is nowhere near where we need to go if we are to reduce and cut pollution to save this fragile planet. It is nowhere near where we need to go if we are to give our children a future which they can rely on, a safe climate, clean water, healthy air and clean, safe food. But it is, now we have strengthened this bill, a step forward in the right direction.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Sarah Hanson-Young says the Greens support the Climate Change Bill 2022 as an important step, but argue it does not go nearly far enough because Australia still needs stronger environment laws and a climate trigger to stop new coal and gas projects. She says the bill is a promise, but real action must follow.
“So, while this bill is an important step forward in acknowledging that our task now is to cut pollution, we need the tools in the toolbox to do it. We need the action to follow. This bill won't deliver the action, but it does deliver the promise.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“Let me be extremely clear. The Greens will be supporting these bills, but they are a very small step forward, and Labor has committed to kicking real action on climate change to the kerb. This is a government that is captured by the likes of Woodside, Chevron and Santos. In Western Australia, literally two-thirds of all offshore gas is given away to these companies for free. The state government gets more money from vehicle registrations than it does from gas royalties. Federally, the petroleum resource rent tax is broken. Australian people are paying for the privilege of having our climate destroyed for the sake of multinational profit. That's a disgrace. While these bills go nowhere near far enough, we are pleased to have secured improvements. The Greens have made sure that Labor's unscientific target of 43 per cent is a minimum, and we are aiming to see that target raised substantially. We've made sure that the Climate Change Authority will be guided by the global temperature goals set out in the Paris Agreement. Crucially, large financing bodies such as Export Finance Australia and Infrastructure Australia will have to consider climate targets when financing projects. This is significant, as these bodies have been vehicles for significant fossil fuel financing.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 2 oppose
“It's time to vote against creating a world where native vegetation, crop yields, the marine environment and the entire biosphere, the beautiful biosphere, is being damaged through an absurd attempt to reduce carbon dioxide. Nature's essential trace gas is essential for all life on the planet. It's time to vote against a world where hunger and poverty will increase by design as a means of control. Have some decency. Vote against the Climate Change Bill 2022. Take a stand. We have one flag, we are one community, we are one nation. We are proud and grateful carbon based life forms.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is a stupid bloody policy that I and One Nation will never support. Put a plan on the table whereby we will move forward with renewables and other energy resources that will build our country, not destroy it and future generations.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
9 speakers · 9 support
“I welcome this legislation, and I hope that we are going to legislate these targets in this parliament. I urge the government to focus on transforming energy to 80 per cent renewables by 2030. We need to clean up transport, modernise industry and regenerate Australia. We have to stop cutting down trees. It really is that simple. I congratulate and I welcome this legislation, but I urge greater action.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“With climate policy, everything has to be looked at through the lens of integrity, because a target without integrity is just a number. It's not going to matter, and future generations will judge us harshly for our inaction and for some of the ridiculous arguments that we've used to avoid acting on what is the biggest challenge humans have ever faced. We have to act. We have to act decisively. I support this bill, and I look forward to working with my colleagues here in the Senate to ensure that this is just the first step not only in ending the climate wars but in winning them and going from being, when it comes to climate action, an embarrassing laggard who turns up to international summits to talk about climate action, spruiks gas companies and tries to water down agreements.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In conclusion, I will be supporting this bill. It is an important first step, the first real step in far too long, but it is not enough. We need more action. We need risk mitigation strategies. We need adaptation plans. We need greater action on electric vehicles. We need to stop putting public money into fossil fuel subsidies and thoughtlessly expanding the number of gas and coal mines without paying heed to the impact on the world. We need to move to the future, not to the past, and bring our communities with us, all those communities around Australia, however they are impacted by this bill. We need strong accountability mechanisms to ensure the government is adopting the right policies, and to ensure those policies are comprehensive and effective and are accountable to the people of this parliament and to the people of this country. I, for one, will be holding the government to account and ensuring that they take the next step and the one after until our country is finally in the place it needs to be.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The work is not finished. This legislation is just the first step and will need amendments and refinements over the coming years. But I say to all the members of parliament, as former President Barack Obama said—and we have heard it before in this chamber—we are the first generation to feel the effect of climate change and the last generation who can do something about it. We need to look back on our time here and see that it was more than just time wasted. What will you tell your loved ones you did when the climate crisis began to dawn on us? Let's use this legislation as a launching pad for more action. I commend these bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We have a long way to go. I will continue to advocate for the changes the people of North Sydney want to see, including pursuing cleaner petrol and stronger fuel efficiency standards for Australian vehicles. But at least the conversation and positive change is underway. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We can't waste any more time, because, quite simply, we don't have any more time. So I do welcome this bill, and I do support the government's move to enshrine our emissions targets in legislation, not least to provide certainty to businesses but also to shore up commitments made on the international stage.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We now have a minimum number to provide certainty for business and community. Further consistent government policy must follow to ensure that we exceed that number and become the leaders that we can be. Let's get on with it. If not us, who? If not now, when? I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I urge everyone in this parliament to support these bills. They are not perfect, but let us not let the perfect be the enemy of the good.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So is this bill enough? Today I will focus on the urgency of our need to act. Pragmatically I will say: today it's enough; I will support this bill. But tomorrow, without pause, our work will continue. I urge the government to remain open to working with other members of this parliament to build collaboratively on this foundation, to work with us to exceed expectations and to surpass this target. Working together, we can be a parliament that actually listens to the voices of its voters. We can be a parliament that exceeds expectations.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Consideration in detail: amendments considered
Amendment packages agreed
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 36 to 30.
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Committee of the whole: amendments considered
Amendment packages agreed
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 37 to 30.
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
House · Message from Senate reported
Message from Senate reported
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Consideration of Senate message
House agreed to Senate amendments
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe final formal approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.
Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee; Committee report (31/08/2022)
Referred to committee
Referred to Committee (28 July 2022): Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee; Committee report (31 Aug 2022)
APH bill page notes