Higher costs
Tariffs or other safeguard measures could raise construction costs, add to inflation and worsen housing affordability by making imported steel and other goods more expensive.
This bill is currently before Parliament.
Immigration, border & security
Australian manufacturers facing sudden import surges would have inquiries handled by one specialist trade body instead of the Productivity Commission.
Tim Ayres (Australian Labor Party) said Australia faced growing risks from sudden import surges and a turbulent global trading system. He said the trade-protection system had not undergone major reform in a decade. The government wanted one specialist agency to handle these inquiries, support manufacturers and consumers, and make regulation more efficient.
Australia’s safeguard system already relied on the Productivity Commission, but a live steel tariff investigation—requested after the Australian Steel Institute sought emergency protection against alleged dumping—brought the practical and international pressures around trade remedies into view. Announced in August 2025 and introduced by Senator Tim Ayres on 24 June 2026, the Government’s bill responds by moving future safeguard inquiries to the renamed Australian Trade Remedies Commission, while preserving the Productivity Commission’s existing inquiry and adding public hearings, published documents and public-interest reporting.
The evidence pack contains no criticism from opposition or crossbench speakers. Its only substantive parliamentary speech is Tim Ayres’s government case for the bill, which describes the transfer, the inquiry test and the public-interest checkA check of the wider effects on producers, consumers, other industries and the economy..
Senator Tim Ayres introduced this bill. Supportive speeches so far have come from Labor.
Did it become law?
Not yet
Final passage
No final vote yet
The bill has not yet completed passage through Parliament.
Days since introduction
44 days
Updated 07 Aug 2026.
Meaning
Australian manufacturers facing sudden import surges would have inquiries handled by one specialist trade body instead of the Productivity Commission.
Businesses using the Anti-Dumping Commission would see it renamed the Australian Trade Remedies Commission, with its legal identity unchanged.
Industries seeking emergency import protection would need the minister to refer their case before an inquiry could begin.
Local producers could receive recommended protection for up to four years. Temporary protection could last up to 200 days.
Consumers and affected businesses would have their interests considered before protection is recommended, alongside the benefits for local producers.
People following an inquiry would receive public notice of the inquiry and its hearings. Hearings would normally be open.
Parliament and the public would receive greater visibility of inquiries. Reports must be tabled within 25 sitting days, while most submitted material must be published.
The Commissioner must hold a safeguard inquiry if a matter is referred to the Commissioner by the Minister. A report on a safeguard inquiry is given to the Minister and tabled in Parliament. 269ZHGB Safeguard inquiries function The Commissioner has the following functions: (a) holding safeguard inquiries and reporting to the Minister about those inquiries; (b) doing anything incidental to the function referred to in paragraph (a).Customs Amendment (Safeguard Inquiries) introduced text
7 Subsections 269SMB(1) and (2) Repeal the subsections, substitute: The body that was continued in existence under this section as previously in force by the name Anti‑Dumping Commission is now to be known as the Australian Trade Remedies Commission. Note: Subsection 25B(1) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 provides that a body whose name is altered by an Act continues in existence under the new name so that its identity is not affected.Customs Amendment (Safeguard Inquiries) introduced text
269ZHGC Establishing a safeguard inquiry Minister’s referral power (1) The Minister may refer a matter to the Commissioner for the Commissioner to conduct a safeguard inquiry in relation to the matter. (2) In referring a matter to the Commissioner, the Minister may, for the purpose of ensuring the inquiry is conducted in the manner appropriate to that inquiry and consistent with the Safeguards Agreement, do any or all of the following: (a) require the Commissioner to hold hearings for the purposes of the inquiry; (b) specify a period within which the Commissioner must submit the CommissioCustoms Amendment (Safeguard Inquiries) introduced text
Recommendation types and duration (4) If the Commissioner is required to make a recommendation in relation to the matter in accordance with paragraph (2)(d), the recommendation must: (a) consist of one or more of the following: (i) a safeguard measure should apply; (ii) a safeguard measure should not apply; (iii) a provisional safeguard measure should apply; (iv) a provisional safeguard measure should not apply; (v) an existing safeguard measure should be extended for a specified period of 1 year or less; (vi) an existing safeguard measure should be extended for a specified period of mCustoms Amendment (Safeguard Inquiries) introduced text
Preconditions for positive recommendations (5) Before making a recommendation in relation to the matter that consists of a measure referred to in subparagraph (4)(a)(i), (iii), (v) or (vi), the Commissioner must: (a) be satisfied there has been an increase in importation of goods to which the matter relates as a result of unforeseen developments that is causing serious injury, or threatening to cause serious injury, to a like Australian industry for the goods, having regard to all relevant evidence of an objective and quantifiable nature having a bearing on the situation of that industry incCustoms Amendment (Safeguard Inquiries) introduced text
269ZHGF Notice of safeguard inquiry As soon as practicable after the Commissioner receives a reference to hold a safeguard inquiry, the Commissioner must give reasonable notice, by publishing a notice on the Australian Trade Remedies Commission’s website, of the Commissioner’s intention to hold the inquiry. 269ZHGG Notice of hearings Before the Commissioner begins to hold hearings for the purposes of a safeguard inquiry, the Commissioner must give reasonable notice, by publishing a notice on the Australian Trade Remedies Commission’s website, of the Commissioner’s intention to hold the hearCustoms Amendment (Safeguard Inquiries) introduced text
269ZHGE Report of safeguard inquiry to be tabled The Minister must cause a copy of the Commissioner’s report on a safeguard inquiry to be tabled in each House of the Parliament: (a) within 25 sitting days of that House after the day on which the Minister receives it; or (b) if the Commissioner recommends that the tabling of the report, or part of the report, be delayed for a specified period—within 25 sitting days of that House after the end of that period.Customs Amendment (Safeguard Inquiries) introduced text
Context
Australia’s safeguard system already relied on the Productivity Commission, but a live steel tariff investigation—requested after the Australian Steel Institute sought emergency protection against alleged dumping—brought the practical and international pressures around trade remedies into view. Announced in August 2025 and introduced by Senator Tim Ayres on 24 June 2026, the Government’s bill responds by moving future safeguard inquiries to the renamed Australian Trade Remedies Commission, while preserving the Productivity Commission’s existing inquiry and adding public hearings, published documents and public-interest reporting.
Government announces transfer of safeguard inquiries to a trade-remedies body
The Government announced that responsibility would move from the Productivity Commission to the renamed Australian Trade Remedies Commission, formerly the Anti-Dumping Commission.
Customs Amendment (Safeguard Inquiries) explanatory memorandum ↗Steel industry seeks emergency protection from imports
The Australian Steel Institute applied for emergency trade protection under WTO rules, prompting Treasurer Jim Chalmers to ask the Productivity Commission to examine alleged dumping in the steel industry.
Australian Financial Review ↗Trading partners oppose Australia’s steel tariff investigation
The European Union, China and other Asian trading partners warned that a possible steel tariff could breach international trade rules and raise costs across the economy.
Australian Financial Review ↗Senator Tim Ayres introduces the bill
The bill begins shifting new safeguard inquiries from the Productivity Commission to the renamed Australian Trade Remedies Commission while allowing the current inquiry to continue under the old rules.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Referred to Committee (02/07/2026): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Report due 28/08/2026
Report due 28 Aug 2026
APH bill page notesKey criticism
The evidence pack contains no criticism from opposition or crossbench speakers. Its only substantive parliamentary speech is Tim Ayres’s government case for the bill, which describes the transfer, the inquiry test and the public-interest checkA check of the wider effects on producers, consumers, other industries and the economy..
The government said protection could give local producers short-term breathing space. It also acknowledged possible effects on consumers, other industries and the wider economy.
Higher costs
Tariffs or other safeguard measures could raise construction costs, add to inflation and worsen housing affordability by making imported steel and other goods more expensive.
Trade-law and diplomatic risks
Using safeguard measures could prompt disputes with trading partners and claims that Australia is breaching international trade rules, potentially escalating trade tensions.
Further sources
Votes
No recorded votes have been found yet for this bill.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Tim Ayres supports the bill, saying it will consolidate trade-remedies functions in one specialist agency, improve regulatory efficiency and strengthen Australia's response to import surges.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
1 speaker · 1 support
“In summary, this Bill will create one-specialist body in the Australian Trade Remedies Commission. It will comply with Australia's commitments to the World Trade Organization and the rules-based trading system. It will provide stronger defences against sudden and unforeseen surges in imports by providing a single authority that can bring deep expertise to trade remedies—supporting Australian industry, our regions and a Future Made in Australia.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate Economics Legislation Committee
Report due 28 Aug 2026
Referred to Committee (2 July 2026): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Report due 28 Aug 2026
APH bill page notes