High Seas Biodiversity

Current status

This bill became law on Apr 8th, 2026.

Policy area

Climate, energy & environment

What does this bill do?

The bill would update Australian law to match a new global oceans agreement.

Why was it introduced?

Australia could not ratify the new High Seas Biodiversity Treaty because domestic law did not yet implement its obligations for activities in areas beyond national jurisdiction. The bill creates that framework, aligning Australian law with the treaty and setting rules for marine protected areas, environmental assessments and marine genetic resources.

Broader context

A new global High Seas Treaty had already created binding rules for protecting plants, animals and genetic resources in international waters, but Australia had no matching law for activities it controls there. After the treaty took effect and other countries ratified it, pressure grew because Australia still could not formally join, so this bill set the domestic rules needed for protected areas, environmental checks and sharing benefits from marine genetic resources.

Key criticism

The main concern was not the treaty goal itself, but how the bill could be used in practice. Critics said it should not lead to extra fishing closures or red tape, and warned that some parts may give officials too much power or leave too much detail to later rules.

Who supported it?

The Labor government introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in Senate 04 Feb 2026
Passed Senate 23 Mar 2026
Passed House 31 Mar 2026
Became law 08 Apr 2026

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 08 Apr 2026

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

Members called out ‘aye’ or ‘no’ — no individual votes were recorded.

Passage speed

55 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. The bill would update Australian law to match a new global oceans agreement. It applies to ocean and seabed areas outside any country’s control, not Australia’s own waters.

  2. It would set rules for taking and using samples from sea plants, animals and microbes in the high seas, and for using genetic data from those samples. The rules deal with sharing benefits, supporting research, and helping countries build skills and access marine technology.

  3. It would create a process for marine protected areas and other managed zones in the high seas. Countries could propose these areas, and the proposals would be considered through an international process.

  4. It would require planned activities in these offshore areas to be checked for environmental risk. Australia could only approve activities it controls if it is satisfied that steps are in place to prevent serious harm to the marine environment.

  5. The bill would also give the Commonwealth stronger powers to enforce these rules. These include audits, notices requiring information or documents, and civil penalties for not complying.

Show source excerpts
  1. The BBNJ Agreement is an implementing agreement under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). UNCLOS provides the comprehensive legal framework within which all activities in the ocean and seas are carried out. UNCLOS contains a general obligation to protect and preserve the marine environment (Article 192) and several related rights and obligations. The BBNJ Agreement augments these rights and obligations by establishing a regime to conserve and sustainably use marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. Areas beyond national jurisdiction includes the water and seabed beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, that is, outside the exclusive economic zone and continental shelf that extend up to and sometimes beyond 200 nautical miles from States’ baselines.
    Explanatory memorandum
  2. Part II of the BBNJ Agreement seeks to regulate activities with respect to marine genetic resources and digital sequence information from marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction by imposing international obligations for benefit sharing, capacity development, research and innovation, and the development and transfer of marine technology.
    Explanatory memorandum
  3. Part III of the BBNJ Agreement creates a framework for establishing area-based management tools (including marine protected areas) in areas beyond national jurisdiction to protect, preserve, restore and maintain biological diversity and ecosystems. Parties can submit proposals to establish area-based management tools, including marine protected areas, for consultation and then decision by the Conference of the Parties.
    Explanatory memorandum
  4. only authorising planned activities after determining that appropriate measures have been put in place to prevent significant adverse impacts on the marine environment; and
    Explanatory memorandum
  5. including audit and information gathering powers to ensure compliance with the Bill (including the ability to issue a notice to produce); and
    Explanatory memorandum

Broader context for this bill

A new global High Seas Treaty had already created binding rules for protecting plants, animals and genetic resources in international waters, but Australia had no matching law for activities it controls there. After the treaty took effect and other countries ratified it, pressure grew because Australia still could not formally join, so this bill set the domestic rules needed for protected areas, environmental checks and sharing benefits from marine genetic resources.

  1. 17 Jan 2026

    High Seas Treaty takes effect for ratifying countries

    The agreement became the first binding global framework for biodiversity in international waters after enough countries ratified it.

    ABC News ↗
  2. 04 Feb 2026

    Australia moves to ratify treaty with enabling bill

    Ministers said Australia needed domestic rules on protected areas, environmental checks and marine genetic resources before it could join the treaty.

    Minister for Foreign Affairs ↗
  3. 23 Mar 2026

    Coalition backs High Seas Bill, citing biodiversity damage

    During Senate debate, support for the measure was linked to long-running concern about harm from activities such as deep-sea trawling.

    OpenAustralia / Senate Hansard ↗
  4. 31 Mar 2026

    Parliament passes bill needed before Australia can ratify

    That completed the domestic legislative step required before Australia could formally become a party to the treaty.

    iEnvironmental Australia ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 04 Feb 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 04 Feb 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Scrutiny of Bills review: raised delegated-legislation concerns 25 Feb 2026

The committee examined whether the bill affects personal rights, gives broad administrative powers, and leaves too much important detail to later rules. It asked the minister to explain and justify those parts.

Considered in published report

Scrutiny Digest 3 of 2026
Second reading debate 23 Mar 2026

Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.

Senate second reading agreed 23 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Senate agreed to amendment packages 23 Mar 2026

Senators examined the bill in detail and considered amendments clause by clause. Amendment: 15 Australian Greens agreed to.

Committee of the Whole debate

Senate third reading agreed 23 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 24 Mar 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 26 Mar 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 30 Mar 2026

Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.

Sent to Federation ChamberA secondary House forum where bills can be debated before returning to the House for final decisions. for debate 31 Mar 2026

The House sent the bill to the Federation ChamberA secondary House forum where bills can be debated before returning to the House for final decisions. so debate could continue in that parallel forum before reporting back to the House.

Referred to Federation ChamberA secondary House forum where bills can be debated before returning to the House for final decisions.

Federation ChamberA secondary House forum where bills can be debated before returning to the House for final decisions. debate 31 Mar 2026

Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.

Second reading debate

Second reading debate 31 Mar 2026

Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.

House second reading agreed 31 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Returned to House for further consideration 31 Mar 2026
House third reading agreed 31 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

The main case against this bill

The main concern was not the treaty goal itself, but how the bill could be used in practice. Critics said it should not lead to extra fishing closures or red tape, and warned that some parts may give officials too much power or leave too much detail to later rules.

Support for the bill was otherwise broad, with most concern focused on safeguards, fairness and practical implementation.

Extra fishing limits

The bill could be used to add more closures and red tape for existing fisheries if it is not applied carefully.

Raised by Tom Venning Source ↗

Too much left to later rules

Some offences and official decisions may make it harder for people to defend themselves, and too much detail may be left to later rules instead of the bill itself.

Raised by Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

23 Mar 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

31 Mar 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Amendments at a glance

Amendments grouped by chamber. Where APH reports aggregate counts, the package card summarizes the matching public amendment sheets by source theme.

Senate

Carried

Australian Greens package: 15 amendments

APH records 15 Australian Greens amendments agreed on the voices. The public amendment list groups them into 2 amendment sheets, so this page summarizes the package by source theme.

23 Mar 2026

Passed on the voices

The chamber agreed to this amendment package without a counted vote. APH records the agreed count by amendment, while the source documents are grouped into amendment sheets.

Themes in the public amendment sheets

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Katy Gallagher

Labor • Senator 04 Feb 2026

Gallagher supports the bill as the legislation needed for Australia to ratify the High Seas Biodiversity Treaty, arguing it will strengthen protection and sustainable use of marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead opposing voice Opposes

Malcolm Roberts

One Nation • Senator 23 Mar 2026

Senator Roberts opposes the bill, arguing it hands excessive power to the United Nations, creates costly and intrusive bureaucracy, threatens fishing and marine research, and effectively enables large-scale ocean closures without clear financial limits.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Peter Whish-Wilson

Greens • Senator 23 Mar 2026

Whish-Wilson clearly supports the bill, describing ratification of the UN high seas treaty as a historic and welcome step to regulate the largely lawless high seas and protect biodiversity and human rights.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

Kate Chaney

Independent • MP 30 Mar 2026

Kate Chaney strongly supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026, arguing it ratifies the high seas treaty, creates legal mechanisms to protect biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction, and is an essential step for ocean governance and regional leadership.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

16 speakers · 15 support · 1 unclear

  1. Wilson Wilson introduces and strongly backs the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026 as the legislation needed to ratify and implement the high seas biodiversity treaty in Australian law, including rules on marine genetic resources, marine protected areas and environmental impact assessments.
    “Australia was proud to sign the high seas biodiversity treaty on 20 September 2023, the day it opened for signature, after playing an active role in its inception and development over two decades. Today I am proud to introduce the High Seas Biodiversity Bill. This implementing legislation will enable us to ratify the treaty, noting that the treaty entered into force on 17 January this year.”

    Labor • MP • 26 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Brown Senator Brown supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026, arguing it is necessary to implement and ratify the international high seas biodiversity agreement and establish Australia’s domestic framework for protecting marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction.
    “Senator CAROL BROWN (Tasmania) (12:00): I rise to speak in support of the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026. This legislation gives effect to Australia's obligation under the Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation of Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction, often referred to as the high seas biodiversity agreement. This legislation allows Australia to implement and ratify the global agreement that will help protect biodiversity on the high seas.”

    Labor • Senator • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Cox Senator Cox supports the bill as necessary to implement Australia’s obligations under the UN High Seas Biodiversity Treaty, strengthen protection of marine biodiversity, and provide domestic rules for high-seas activities.
    “Australia signed the treaty on the first day it opened for signature back in 2023. It has now entered into force internationally. Australia requires enabling legislation before we can ratify, and this bill provides the framework. It is important that we act swiftly. The first conference of the parties is expected in August this year, and Australia is currently co-chairing that preparatory commission. If we want to shape how international marine protected areas are established and managed, we must ratify in time to participate as a full party.”

    Labor • Senator • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Briskey Briskey argues that the bill is essential to implement the high seas biodiversity treaty, protect marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction, and ensure Australia plays a leading role in global ocean governance.
    “This bill is about the future. It is about ensuring that our children grow up in a world where wilderness still exists, not only on land but in the deep and distant parts of our oceans. There will always be those that say we should wait or do less, but climate change is not waiting, biodiversity loss is not waiting and ocean degradation is not waiting. This bill is a statement that Australia has turned a corner and that under Labor science, evidence and responsibility guide our environmental policy, not denial or delay. The High Seas Biodiversity Bill is Australia's contribution to a nature positive future. It strengthens our standing as a global environmental leader, a reliable regional partner and a nation willing to act when the moment demands it. I proudly commend the bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Coffey Coffey argues that the bill is an important and sensible framework for protecting high seas biodiversity by regulating marine genetic resources, enabling recognition of international marine protected areas, and requiring environmental impact assessments for risky activities.
    “I can get seasick in a bathtub, so it is with some apprehension that I venture mentally onto the high seas—but here we go. The high seas are the international marine waters beyond the jurisdiction of any country. These waters and the seabeds below them are essential to biodiversity, climate regulation and the overall health of marine ecosystems. Yet only around one per cent of them is currently protected. That is the gap this legislation helps address.”

    Labor • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. French Tom French clearly supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026, arguing it will implement Australia’s treaty obligations, strengthen protection and environmental assessment of high seas activities, and benefit coastal communities like Moore by safeguarding marine ecosystems and the economy.
    “This legislation reflects a straightforward principle: the condition of our coastline is shaped by not only what we do within our borders but what occurs beyond them. For the people of Moore, this bill is a practical step in protecting the environment they rely on every day. It supports sustainable industry, sustains international cooperation and ensures Australia is contributing to the responsible management of the global ocean. For those reasons, I commend the bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Watt The minister strongly supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026, arguing it is necessary for Australia to ratify the UN high seas biodiversity treaty, strengthen ocean conservation beyond national jurisdiction, and support Australia's regional leadership and ocean economy.
    “Australia has engaged in the more than 20 years of discussion and negotiations for this treaty, and we are co-chairing the process to prepare for the first meeting of the conference of the parties. This bill is necessary for Australia to ratify the treaty and to safeguard the health of our shared ocean, support our thriving ocean economy for future generations and maintain our hard earned reputation as a global ocean leader. I thank all members who have contributed to this debate. I also thank the many environmental non-government organisations that have campaigned for a long time to have this legislation passed. I also recognise the constructive engagement of a number of industry groups as we've developed this legislation. On that basis, I commend the bill to the chamber.”

    Labor • Senator • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Berry Berry argues that protecting marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdictions is critically important and says the bill is needed so Australia can ratify the high seas biodiversity treaty.
    “I am proud that the Albanese Labor government is a recognised leader when it comes to the high seas biodiversity treaty. We were one of the first countries to sign it and we have been leading, with Belize, the international negotiations to prepare the treaty for implementation. I support this bill wholeheartedly and am proud to be contributing to its passage through parliament.”

    Labor • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  9. Claydon Sharon Claydon strongly supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026, arguing it will ratify the high seas treaty, strengthen protections against damaging marine activities and help Australia lead on science-based ocean conservation.
    “Not a single law will solve this crisis overnight, but this is a critical step towards healthier oceans, stronger ecosystems and a more sustainable future. In this place, we can choose to lead. We can choose to act with courage, guided by science and responsibility. That's why I commend this bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Coker Coker argues that the bill is important for coastal communities and for Australia’s implementation of the high seas biodiversity treaty, saying it will protect marine ecosystems beyond national jurisdiction through rules on genetic resources, protected areas, impact assessments and capacity building.
    “This bill is about responsibility: responsibility for our environment, responsibility for our communities and responsibility for future generations. The ocean connects us all, and protecting it is a shared task. In my electorate, people understand what is at stake. They see the ocean every day, they rely on it and they can expect us to act. This bill meets that expectation. It strengthens Australia's leadership, it protects our national interest and it contributes to a global effort to safeguard the health of our oceans. If we want our communities to continue to thrive, if we want our environment to be protected and if we want future generations to enjoy what we all enjoy today, then we must act. This bill is part of that action. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  11. Gorman The speaker strongly supports the bill, arguing it is necessary for Australia to ratify the high seas biodiversity treaty, strengthen ocean protections, support businesses and research, and maintain Australia’s leadership in international ocean governance.
    “Australia has engaged in the more than 20 years of discussion and negotiations for this treaty, and we are co-chairing the process to prepare for the first meeting of the conference of the parties. I commend this bill because it is necessary for Australia to (1) ratify the treaty and safeguard the health of our shared ocean, (2) support our thriving ocean economy for future generations and (3) maintain our hard-earned reputation as a global ocean leader. I thank all members for their contributions and I commend the bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  12. Campbell Campbell highlights Labor’s marine conservation record and describes the high seas treaty as an important framework for protecting biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction.
    “The high seas treaty will create a comprehensive international legal structure dedicated to protecting and responsibly managing marine biodiversity in areas that lie beyond the control of individual nations, because the ocean and the environment don't see borders, but that doesn't mean that they don't deserve protection. It is designed to work alongside and to reinforce existing global and regional agreements, filling critical gaps in ocean governance where regulation has previously been limited. By promoting stronger cooperation and coordinated action among countries, the high seas treaty will play a pivotal role in safeguarding marine ecosystems, supporting sustainable use of ocean resources and maintaining ocean health. It will be a key mechanism in advancing the global commitment to conserve at least 30 per cent of the world's oceans by 2030.”

    Labor • MP • 26 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  13. Laxale Laxale strongly supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026, arguing it enables Australia to ratify the UN high seas treaty, protect ocean ecosystems, and show international leadership on conservation.
    “I want to thank the advocates who helped get this over the line, including Drew Alsop and Damian Spruce from the Minderoo Foundation, as well as the Parliamentary Friends of the Ocean and the Parliamentary Friends of Sustainable Development. They've all worked really hard to put the environment at the forefront of what a good government does. Be it on this, be it on environmental law reform passed late last year or be it on setting an achievable and ambitious emissions reduction target, I hope that Australians know we have the environment and care for our ecosystems at the centre of what we do. We owe our existence today to a healthy planet, and today, by passing this bill, hopefully we take a step towards ensuring that the existence of this beautiful planet continues for generations to come. We don't have any other option; we need to look after this planet.”

    Labor • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  14. Cook Trish Cook strongly supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026, describing it as a historic measure to implement the BBNJ Agreement, enable Australia to ratify the High Seas Treaty, and create a robust regulatory regime for protecting biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction.
    “Ms TRISH COOK (Bullwinkel) (19:10): I rise today in support of the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026. For a nation like Australia, an island continent defined by its relationship with the sea, this legislation is a historic step towards securing the blue heart of our planet. Beyond our national waters lie the high seas. This vast expanse covers 60 per cent of the global ocean yet currently only one per cent of these waters are protected. Today, the Albanese government is acting on that.”

    Labor • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  15. Lim The speaker strongly supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026, arguing that ratifying the treaty will strengthen international protection of marine biodiversity, support sustainable ocean management, and demonstrate Australia’s commitment to protecting oceans for future generations.
    “So ratifying the high seas biodiversity treaty demonstrates Australia's commitment to international law and our commitment to better protecting our ocean and its marine life for future generations. I'm pleased to support this bill.”

    Labor • MP • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

5 speakers · 4 support · 1 mixed

  1. Venning Venning says parliament should support sustainable oceans and international cooperation on high seas biodiversity, but he argues the bill risks becoming a vehicle for more domestic fishing restrictions and added red tape.
    “Protecting the high seas and feeding Australia are not competing objectives. We need this government, in the exact same breath as it passes this bill, to firmly commit to a domestic ocean governance framework that finally gives food production the exact same standing it currently gives conservation. My message to the government is incredibly simple: if this bill is to succeed, which it will—if it is to genuinely protect biodiversity while strengthening Australia's position globally—then the commercial fishing industry must be at the table from the very start, not as a token afterthought, not as a box-ticking consultation exercise, but as a respected, genuine partner, because, when you actually work with the industry, you get better policy, you get vastly better environmental outcomes and you get a much stronger, more resilient Australia.”

    Liberal • MP • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Bell Bell states that the coalition supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill because it implements a treaty Australia helped negotiate and provides a framework to protect biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction.
    “In closing, the coalition supports this bill. We support it because it gives effect to a treaty that Australia helped negotiate. We support it because it provides a framework for protecting biodiversity in the high seas, and we support it because it aligns with Australia's longstanding commitment to responsible ocean stewardship, but that does not mean a blank cheque. We will continue to scrutinise the implementation of this treaty. We will continue to advocate for practical, efficient and effective regulation and will continue to hold the government to account for delays, for lack of detail and for any failure to deliver on its commitments. Australia has a proud record when it comes to managing our oceans. That record was strengthened under the coalition, and we intend to ensure that it's not diminished under this government.”

    LNP • MP • 26 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. McLachlan Senator McLachlan clearly supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026, describing it as an important measure to implement Australia’s treaty obligations and protect marine biodiversity.
    “In my time remaining, I would reinforce to the chamber this is an important bill, one that should pass the Senate as quickly as possible so that the great work of all the conservationists and all of those in the department can continue to protect our natural world.”

    Liberal • Senator • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Bragg Bragg says the coalition supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026 on a bipartisan basis, while raising questions about enforcement and remaining open to considering amendments through consultation.
    “We acknowledge the work of the government in bringing this bill forward. We will be looking to support this on a bipartisan basis. We look forward to questioning the government on its enforcement record, when it puts in place its new environmental bureaucracy. We hope that it is a bureaucracy which does more harm—does less harm than good. I'm trying to work on that one. 'Does more good than bad'—maybe that's a good one; what do you think? Good? You can't answer the question. So that's what we hope. We hope this will be a good proposal.”

    Liberal • Senator • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Kennedy Kennedy says the coalition proudly supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026, arguing it is needed to implement the UN high seas treaty after delays by Labor.
    “Mr KENNEDY (Cook) (19:06): The coalition proudly supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026. This legislation is necessary to finally put in place the UN high seas treaty after years of delay under Labor. The people of Cook are huge supporters of the ocean—as am I. Proudly announced as Australia's best beach in 2026, Bate Bay is the pride of the Sutherland Shire, much of Sydney and much of Australia.”

    Liberal • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Greens

3 speakers · 3 support

  1. Hodgins-May Senator Hodgins-May supports the bill as a long-overdue measure implementing the high seas treaty to protect biodiversity in international waters, while criticising Australia’s delay in ratifying it and the government’s broader ocean and fossil fuel policies.
    “Right now, our oceans are under immense strain, and this is why the Greens welcome and support the High Seas Biodiversity Bill.”

    Greens • Senator • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. McKim Senator McKim says the Greens welcome the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026 and will support it, calling it a significant step forward.
    “The Greens welcome this legislation, will be supporting it and regard it as a significant step forward.”

    Greens • Senator • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

One Nation

1 speaker · 1 oppose

Minor parties and independents

4 speakers · 4 support

  1. Ryan Ryan says the bill implements Australia’s obligations under the high seas treaty by creating regimes for marine genetic resources, marine protected areas and environmental impact assessments, and argues it will improve protection of the ocean while providing certainty for Australian researchers and industry.
    “The High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026 establishes a long-overdue framework for protecting marine genetic resources, strengthening Australia's compliance with our international obligations and providing certainty for our scientific, commercial and research communities. It will contribute to advances in understanding and sustainable use of one of the largest and least understood parts of our beautiful planet. If properly enforced, it should ensure that Australia plays its part in safeguarding biodiversity and share in the benefits of those resources. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Independent • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Steggall Steggall strongly supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026, arguing it is overdue legislation needed for Australia to ratify and implement the high seas treaty and strengthen protection of international marine ecosystems.
    “The high seas are not someone else's problem but are a problem of all of us. It's a living system that shapes our coasts, our weather, our fisheries and our future. This bill is a chance to move from signature to stewardship, to bring international commitments into Australian law with real enforcement, real transparency and real ambition. There is now a clear mandate to pass the bill, fund it and use it to protect our oceans.”

    Independent • MP • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Scamps Scamps supports the High Seas Biodiversity Bill 2026, describing ratification of the UN high seas treaty as a significant and necessary step to protect marine biodiversity, enable marine protected areas, require environmental assessments and manage emerging risks like deep-sea mining.
    “Returning to the bill before us, the high seas treaty provides an opportunity to better manage existing and emerging risks in the deep ocean, such as bottom trawling, deep-sea mining and other activities where the environmental impacts are still uncertain. Having a framework that supports precaution and proper environmental assessment is essential, and this legislation is an important step. It establishes the framework we need to better protect the high seas, and ratifying it positions Australia to play a constructive role in that effort. I commend the government for bringing this bill forward, and I support its passage. I also acknowledge the work of the Australian environmental and conservation organisations, scientists and advocates who have contributed to this outcome over many, many years. Their efforts have been critical in getting us to this point. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Independent • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat