Members of Parliament (Staff) Amendment (Providing Certainty and Improving Integrity)

Current status

This bill did not become law and is no longer proceeding.

Policy area

Government & democracy

What does this bill do?

The bill would amend the Members of Parliament (Staff) Act 1984The Commonwealth law that provides for the employment of staff for parliamentarians and office-holders. to create statutory minimum staffing guarantees for non-government parliamentarians, rather than leaving those minimums entirely to executive discretion.

Why was it introduced?

The bill was introduced by non-government senators to put minimum personal-staff allocations for the Opposition, larger non-government parties, smaller minority parties and independents into primary legislation. The explanatory memorandum and second-reading speeches say the sponsors were responding to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's staffing decisions in 2022 and later, which they argued reduced the capacity of opposition and crossbench parliamentarians to analyse legislation, prepare amendments, take part in committees and estimates, and scrutinise government. The bill was also framed as a transparency and integrity measure because it would stop a future Prime Minister reducing those minimum entitlements by determination.

Key criticism

The main criticism recorded in debate came from the Greens. Senator Waters agreed that Prime Ministerial discretion over parliamentary staffing was inappropriate, but said the Coalition bill entrenched major-party power and should instead be replaced by an independent staffing model developed with all elected groups and individuals.

Who supported it?

Senators Michaelia Cash, Ralph Babet, Pauline Hanson and Fatima Payman introduced this bill. It was supported by Liberal Party, One Nation, Nationals, Australia's Voice, some crossbench members; opposed by Labor, Greens; and did not pass.

Introduced in Senate 25 Aug 2025
Failed in Senate 03 Sept 2025
Did not reach House
Did not become law

Did it become law?

No

The bill did not complete passage through Parliament.

Final passage

Did not pass

2 recorded votes before the bill stopped proceeding

Time before failure

9 days

From introduction to the final recorded step before the bill stopped proceeding

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. The bill would amend the Members of Parliament (Staff) Act 1984The Commonwealth law that provides for the employment of staff for parliamentarians and office-holders. to create statutory minimum staffing guarantees for non-government parliamentarians, rather than leaving those minimums entirely to executive discretion.

  2. The Opposition would be entitled to at least 110 non-ministerial personal staffPersonal staff employed to support parliamentarians who are not ministers, separate from electorate office staff and ministerial staff., or 22 per cent of the total number of government staff, whichever was higher.

  3. A non-government party with eight or more parliamentarians would be entitled to at least 25 non-ministerial personal staffPersonal staff employed to support parliamentarians who are not ministers, separate from electorate office staff and ministerial staff., or five per cent of the total number of government staff, whichever was higher.

  4. An independent parliamentarian, or a parliamentarian in a minority party with fewer than eight parliamentarians, would be entitled to at least three non-ministerial personal staffPersonal staff employed to support parliamentarians who are not ministers, separate from electorate office staff and ministerial staff., including at least one Senior Adviser.

  5. The Prime Minister could still make determinations that increased a non-government parliamentarian or group's staffing allocation, but any determination that reduced the bill's minimum entitlements would be void to that extent.

  6. The bill would also limit office-holders from employing staff beyond their staffing allocation or Senior Adviser allocationThe number of positions within a staffing allocation that could be held at a Senior Adviser classification level., and would let the Leader of the Opposition or a qualifying minority-party leader decide how a group allocation was shared inside that group.

  7. The explanatory memorandum says the bill responds to staffing cuts made by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in 2022 and later, which the sponsors argued weakened Parliament's practical capacity to scrutinise government.

  8. The Senate agreed to a Greens second-reading amendmentA parliamentary amendment to the motion about whether a bill should be read a second time. It can add a statement or criticism without changing the bill text itself. calling for the government to work with all elected groups and individuals on a fair and independent personal-staff allocation model that reflected representation and addressed staff wellbeing and workload.

  9. The amended second-reading motion was agreed, but the bill itself did not pass the Senate. The third-reading vote was defeated 29 votes to 32, and the APH bill page records the bill as not proceeding.

Show source excerpts
  1. This Bill amends the Members of Parliament (Staff) Act 1984 to place statutory minimum staffing guarantees for non-government parliamentarians and to remove the power of the executive to reduce those minima by later determination.
    Explanatory memorandum
  2. all of the parliamentarians (taken together) who are members of the Opposition ... the highest of the following: (a) 110; (b) 22% of the total number of Government staff ...
    Introduced bill text
  3. all of the parliamentarians (taken together) who are members of a minority party of 8 or more parliamentarians ... the highest of the following: (a) 25; (b) 5% of the total number of Government staff ...
    Introduced bill text
  4. an independent parliamentarian ... (a) 3 ... (a) 1 ... a parliamentarian who is a member of a minority party of less than 8 parliamentarians ... (a) 3 ... (a) 1
    Introduced bill text
  5. the determination must not reduce an entitlement that the parliamentarian or group of parliamentarians would otherwise have under subsection 12A(1) ... An instrument made under subsection (2) is void to the extent that it contravenes subsection (2A)
    Introduced bill text
  6. An office-holder cannot exercise their power to employ a person ... if ... the total number of personal employees ... is equal to or exceeds the entity's staffing allocation ... The following individual is responsible for deciding how the staffing allocation and Senior Adviser allocation ... is to be shared
    Introduced bill text
  7. The Bill is required because in 2022 and subsequently, Labor Prime Minister Albanese used executive determinations to cut personal staffing for some non-government parliamentarians ... these cuts materially weakened Parliament’s practical capacity to hold the Government to account.
    Explanatory memorandum
  8. the Senate calls on the Government to work with all elected groups and individuals in the Parliament to develop a fair and independent staffing model for allocating personal staff that reflects the diversity of representation ... and addresses staff wellbeing and sustainability of workload.
    Australian Greens second-reading amendment, sheet 3422
  9. Original question, as amended, agreed to. Bill read a second time. ... DIVISION:NOES 32 (3 majority) AYES 29 ... Question negatived.
    Senate Hansard, 3 September 2025

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced in the Senate 25 Aug 2025

Non-government senators introduced the bill in the Senate.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading moved 25 Aug 2025

Debate opened on the bill's proposal to set minimum staffing guarantees for non-government parliamentarians.

Second reading debate 28 Aug 2025

Senators debated staffing allocations for opposition, minor-party and independent parliamentarians.

Senate agreed to amendment packages 03 Sept 2025

The Senate agreed to a Greens second-reading amendmentA parliamentary amendment to the motion about whether a bill should be read a second time. It can add a statement or criticism without changing the bill text itself. calling for a fair and independent model for allocating personal staff.

Second reading debate :

Senate second reading agreed 03 Sept 2025

The Senate agreed to the bill in principle, as amended by the Greens second-reading statement.

Second reading agreed to

Third readingThe final vote on whether a bill passes a chamber. This bill was defeated at third reading in the Senate. defeated 03 Sept 2025

The Senate defeated the third-reading motion, so the bill did not pass the Senate and did not proceed.

Third readingThe final vote on whether a bill passes a chamber. This bill was defeated at third reading in the Senate. negatived

The main case against this bill

The main criticism recorded in debate came from the Greens. Senator Waters agreed that Prime Ministerial discretion over parliamentary staffing was inappropriate, but said the Coalition bill entrenched major-party power and should instead be replaced by an independent staffing model developed with all elected groups and individuals.

The bill's sponsors and several supporting senators argued the opposite: that statutory minimums were needed urgently because Prime Ministerial discretion had already reduced opposition and crossbench scrutiny capacity.

Major-party entrenchment

Senator Waters said the bill shared concerns about unfair staffing decisions but used a model that entrenched major-party power rather than creating an independent allocation system.

Raised by Larissa Waters Source ↗

Need for independent model

The Greens amendment called for the government to work with all elected groups and individuals on a fair and independent model that reflected representation and addressed workload and wellbeing.

Raised by Australian Greens Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The chamber-passage votes come first. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.

Defeated

Senate passed the bill

Aye 29 No 32

Defeated 29 to 32. Support came from Liberal Party, One Nation, Nationals, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens.

03 Sept 2025

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 23
Liberal Party 17 / 0
Greens 0 / 9
Independent 3 / 0
One Nation 3 / 0
Nationals 2 / 0
Unknown 2 / 0
Australia's Voice 1 / 0
UAP 1 / 0

Amendments at a glance

Recorded amendment and procedural votes grouped by chamber. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.

Senate

Carried

Call for independent staffing model

Aye 40 No 23

Moved by Larissa Waters (Australian Greens). Passed 40 to 23. Support came from Liberal Party, Greens, Nationals, One Nation, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor.

03 Sept 2025

This changed the Senate's second-reading motion but did not amend the bill text.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 23
Liberal Party 18 / 0
Greens 9 / 0
Independent 3 / 0
Nationals 3 / 0
One Nation 3 / 0
Unknown 2 / 0
Australia's Voice 1 / 0
UAP 1 / 0

This list includes amendment votes, procedural votes and votes on the bill itself.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Wendy Askew

Liberal Party • Senator 25 Aug 2025

Wendy Askew introduced the bill and incorporated the second-reading speech, arguing that the Prime Minister had too much discretion over non-government staffing and that the bill would restore transparency, minimum staffing levels and parliamentary scrutiny.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Pauline Hanson

Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party • Senator 28 Aug 2025

Pauline Hanson supported the bill, arguing that cuts to One Nation and other crossbench staffing weakened senators' ability to scrutinise legislation and represent voters.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

Fatima Payman

Australia's Voice • Senator 28 Aug 2025

Fatima Payman supported the bill and said she co-signed it because she believed the Prime Minister had used staffing powers to punish dissent after she left the Labor Party.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Malcolm Roberts

Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party • Senator 03 Sept 2025

Malcolm Roberts supported the bill, saying it would restore fairness in crossbench staffing and protect parliamentary accountability after cuts to senators who often opposed Labor.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Coalition

5 speakers · 6 contributions · 5 support

  1. Michaelia Cash Michaelia Cash supported the bill, saying it would put a minimum floor under non-government staffing so the Prime Minister could not reduce the resources used to scrutinise government.
    “All we are doing with this bill is putting a minimum floor—that's it—under staffing so that the Prime Minister cannot starve the parliament of the resources that it needs”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 28 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Jonathon Duniam 2 contributions Jonathon Duniam supported the bill and said parliamentarians should have enough resources to do their jobs, including senators whose views differ from his own.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Jonathon Duniam on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Liberal Party • Senator • 28 Aug 2025

    Jonathon Duniam supported the bill and said parliamentarians should have enough resources to do their jobs, including senators whose views differ from his own.

    “While it wouldn't aid me to have my opponents better resourced, it is the right thing to do.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Liberal Party • Senator • 03 Sept 2025

    Jonathon Duniam again supported the bill while criticising the Greens and government over staffing arrangements, and noted the Greens second-reading amendmentA parliamentary amendment to the motion about whether a bill should be read a second time. It can add a statement or criticism without changing the bill text itself. before the vote.

    “This is an excellent bill and I commend it.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  3. James McGrath James McGrath supported the bill as a way to replace opaque Prime Ministerial discretion with clearer guidelines for opposition and crossbench staffing allocations.
    “This bill makes simple changes to the Members of Parliament (Staff) Act 1984, commonly known as the MOP(S) Act, to create clear guidelines on staffing allocations for the opposition and crossbench.”

    Liberal National Party • Senator • 28 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Jessica Collins Jessica Collins supported the bill, arguing it would guarantee minimum resources for opposition, larger non-government parties, smaller minor parties and independents.
    “This bill amends the Members of Parliament (Staff) Act 1984 to place statutory minimum staffing guarantees for non-government parliamentarians and to remove the power of the executive to reduce these.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 03 Sept 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Greens

1 speaker · 1 mixed

  1. Larissa Waters Larissa Waters shared concerns about Prime Ministerial discretion over staffing, but argued the Coalition model entrenched major-party power.
    “The model proposed by the coalition, however, is more of the same, which entrenches the power of the major parties.”

    Australian Greens • Senator • 28 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

One Nation

2 speakers · 2 support

Minor parties and independents

2 speakers · 2 support

  1. Ralph Babet Ralph Babet supported the bill, saying it would set minimum staffing levels for non-government MPs and prevent the Prime Minister from using staffing decisions to silence opponents.
    “This bill fixes that. It sets a minimum staffing level for non-government MPs, and we need it.”

    United Australia Party • Senator • 28 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat