Dean Smith
Dean Smith supports the bill and says it offers a practical way to incentivise food donations to charities instead of dumping surplus food.
Read in Hansard ↗This bill did not become law and is no longer proceeding.
Budget, tax & economy
Companies that donate food, sell edible food cheaply, or provide related services to registered food charities could claim a new tax offset for eligible donation costs.
Rising living costs have pushed food relief demand beyond supply, while much edible food is still thrown out because discarding it is cheaper than donating it. The bill creates a temporary tax offset for companies’ eligible food donation costs to encourage more food to be donated to registered charities.
Foodbank AustraliaThe major food relief group whose earlier work helped shape the proposal and whose reports were used to argue that food insecurity was rising. and KPMGThe consulting firm that helped model the tax incentive and published analysis that influenced the bill's design. had already developed a tax-incentive model in 2020 and 2023, but by the year to July 2023 food insecurity had worsened to 3.7 million households while millions of tonnes of edible food were still being discarded because throwing it out was cheaper than donating it. The bill, introduced on 2 July 2024, proposed a temporary tax offset to shift that cost calculus and increase donations to registered food charities, but it did not pass and lapsed at the end of Parliament on 21 July 2025.
The available bill-scoped record does not show a developed public case against the bill. It contains one supportive speech, a scrutiny entry, and one Senate amendment outcome carried on voicesA parliamentary vote outcome where the chamber agrees without a counted division, so there is no recorded tally of votes., so any broader criticism should be treated as not established from this run.
Senator Dean Smith introduced this bill. Speeches supporting it came from Liberal Party.
Did it become law?
No
The bill did not complete passage through Parliament.
Final passage
No final passage
The bill has not completed passage and is no longer proceeding.
Time before failure
384 days
From introduction to the final recorded step before the bill stopped proceeding
Meaning
Companies that donate food, sell edible food cheaply, or provide related services to registered food charities could claim a new tax offset for eligible donation costs.
Smaller companies with turnover under $20 million could get the offset as a cash-refundable tax benefit, while larger companies could only use it to reduce tax they owe.
The tax break would be capped at $5 million a year, or a set share of donation costs, with higher support rates for smaller businesses.
Companies could claim costs like producing, storing and transporting donated food, but not general overheads or marketing, and related-party purchases would only count up to market value.
The tax incentive would be temporary for three years, with an independent review ordered by the minister to decide whether it should continue.
This Bill amends the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 and the Income Tax (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997. It introduces a tax offset for companies that are constitutional corporations regarding certain expenditure incurred in relation to undertaking food donations activities for registered food charities.Tax Laws Amendment (Incentivising Food Donations to Charitable Organisations) explanatory memorandum
The food donations tax offset is a refundable tax offset if a company’s aggregated turnover is less than $20 million. Otherwise, the offset is a non-refundable tax offset.Tax Laws Amendment (Incentivising Food Donations to Charitable Organisations) explanatory memorandum
The amount of the tax offset is capped at the lower of $5 million or a specified percentage of the expenditure incurred in undertaking the food donations activities. The specified percentage is calculated according to the company’s aggregated turnover in an income year.Tax Laws Amendment (Incentivising Food Donations to Charitable Organisations) explanatory memorandum
It also contains a suite of integrity measures, among them limiting the claimable amount for goods and services purchased from entities not at arm's length from a company to their market value.Second reading speech
The incentive outlined in this Bill is a temporary measure to deal with present challenges, with an independent review of the merits of extension or not ordered by the relevant Minister after three years.Tax Laws Amendment (Incentivising Food Donations to Charitable Organisations) explanatory memorandum
Context
Foodbank AustraliaThe major food relief group whose earlier work helped shape the proposal and whose reports were used to argue that food insecurity was rising. and KPMGThe consulting firm that helped model the tax incentive and published analysis that influenced the bill's design. had already developed a tax-incentive model in 2020 and 2023, but by the year to July 2023 food insecurity had worsened to 3.7 million households while millions of tonnes of edible food were still being discarded because throwing it out was cheaper than donating it. The bill, introduced on 2 July 2024, proposed a temporary tax offset to shift that cost calculus and increase donations to registered food charities, but it did not pass and lapsed at the end of Parliament on 21 July 2025.
Foodbank and KPMGThe consulting firm that helped model the tax incentive and published analysis that influenced the bill's design. develop a national food donation tax incentive model
The bill drew on KPMGThe consulting firm that helped model the tax incentive and published analysis that influenced the bill's design.'s 2020 report for Foodbank AustraliaThe major food relief group whose earlier work helped shape the proposal and whose reports were used to argue that food insecurity was rising., which set out a tax incentive aimed at making food donation more financially viable for companies.
Tax Laws Amendment (Incentivising Food Donations to Charitable Organisations) explanatory memorandum ↗Foodbank reports food insecurity surging as edible food is still wasted
The 2023 Foodbank Hunger Report said 3.7 million households experienced moderate to severe food insecurity in the 12 months to July 2023, while evidence cited for the bill said about 70% of discarded food was still fit to eat.
Second reading speech ↗KPMGThe consulting firm that helped model the tax incentive and published analysis that influenced the bill's design. publishes implementation analysis for the proposed incentive
A second KPMGThe consulting firm that helped model the tax incentive and published analysis that influenced the bill's design. report in 2023 refined how a national food donation tax incentive could operate, and many of its recommendations were reflected in the bill.
Tax Laws Amendment (Incentivising Food Donations to Charitable Organisations) explanatory memorandum ↗Bill introduced to encourage companies to donate food
The bill was introduced proposing a tax offset for eligible food donation costs in response to rising cost-of-living pressure, higher demand at food charities, and the fact that disposing of surplus food was often cheaper than donating it.
Second reading speech ↗Bill lapses at the end of Parliament
The proposal did not complete its parliamentary passage and fell away when Parliament ended, so the food donation tax offset was never enacted.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Referred to Committee (04/07/2024): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (15/11/2024)
Referred to committee
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Key criticism
The available bill-scoped record does not show a developed public case against the bill. It contains one supportive speech, a scrutiny entry, and one Senate amendment outcome carried on voicesA parliamentary vote outcome where the chamber agrees without a counted division, so there is no recorded tally of votes., so any broader criticism should be treated as not established from this run.
No substantive opposition is evident in the scoped record, but the evidence base is limited.
Votes
Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.
Senate
The Senate agreed on voices to the committee-stage amendment sponsored by Senator Askew.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Dean Smith supports the bill and says it offers a practical way to incentivise food donations to charities instead of dumping surplus food.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
1 speaker · 1 support
“I commend the Bill to the Senate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Lapsed at end of Parliament
Lapsed at end of Parliament
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (15/11/2024)
Referred to committee
Referred to Committee (4 July 2024): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (15 Nov 2024)
APH bill page notes