Small publishers could miss out
Without guaranteed access to platform deals and grants, funding could flow mainly to large media companies, worsening concentration and leaving small, independent and regional outlets behind.
This bill became law on Aug 26th, 2026.
Culture, sport & community
Registered news businesses will have registration changes reported to the department running the payment scheme.
The government said the bill was needed so the department running the News Journalism Payment SchemeA program distributing collected money to eligible news organisations. could receive timely registration information and check who remained eligible for funding. It covers 10 types of registration, approval and news-source changes. The government said commercial broadcasters’ share of Australian advertising spending fell from 43 per cent in 2006 to 17 per cent in 2022 as advertising moved online. Consultation ran from 28 April to 18 May 2026 and received 56 submissions, of which 46 were published with permission.
Australia already had the News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code, which began on 3 March 2021 after the ACCC identified a bargaining-power imbalance between large digital platforms and news organisations. As journalism economics worsened and warnings emerged that the proposed incentive could cost jobs, the Government committed on 12 December 2024 to a News Bargaining Incentive, followed by the News Journalism Payment SchemeA program distributing collected money to eligible news organisations. and this accompanying Bill, which requires ACMA to keep eligibility information current; Parliament passed it on 20 August 2026 and Royal Assent followed on 26 August.
Melissa McIntosh (Liberal) argued the wider payments package followed two years of delay and might provide less support than the previous system. She also questioned whether platform advertising revenue could be measured accurately and whether government-run funding would remain independent. Monique Ryan (Independent) argued artificial intelligence services were left outside the scheme. She also said the rules could still favour large publishers, noting that 35 per cent of roughly 200 Local & Independent News Association members — a network for small news publishers — fell below the $150,000 annual revenue threshold. Alex Antic (Liberal) argued the package would subsidise established media companies without ensuring money reached journalism.
Hon Anika Wells MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 26 Aug 2026
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
4 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
13 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Registered news businesses will have registration changes reported to the department running the payment scheme.
Newly registered news businesses and their controlling companies will have their details shared with the department.
News businesses that lose registration or approval will have the change and its reason reported to the department.
News businesses that report an unmet rule or ownership change will have the relevant details passed to the department.
News businesses that add or remove a news sourceAn outlet forming part of a registered news business. will have that change reported to the department.
News businesses affected by a report will have the event date, news sources and available contact details included.
52PA Notification of Communications Secretary (1) The ACMA must: (a) notify the Communications Secretary if any of the events in column 1 of the following table occur; and (b) include the information in column 2 in the notification:News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Act 2026
The ACMA registers a news business under paragraph 52G(1)(a) Details of the registered news business The ACMA registers a corporation under paragraph 52G(1)(b) Details of the registered news business corporation The ACMA endorses a registered news business corporation for a registered news business under paragraph 52G(1)(c) Details of the following: (a) the registered news business corporation; (b) the registered news businessNews Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Act 2026
The ACMA revokes the registration of a registered news business under subsection 52H(1), (2) or (3) or 52I(2) Details of the following: (a) the news business; (b) the registered news business corporation that was endorsed for the news business; (c) the reason for the revocation The ACMA revokes the registration of a registered news business corporation under subsection 52H(4) or (5) or 52I(2) Details of the following: (a) the corporation; (b) each news business for which the corporation was endorsed; (c) the reason for the revocation The ACMA revokes the endorsement of a registered nNews Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Act 2026
A registered news business corporation gives the ACMA a notification under section 52J Details of the following: (a) the registered news business corporation; (b) if the notification under section 52J relates to a registered news business—that registered news business; (c) the requirement that was not metNews Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Act 2026
The ACMA adds a news source to a registered news business under subsection 52K(3) Details of the following: (a) the registered news business corporation that made the application under subsection 52K(1); (b) the registered news business (including details of the news source that was added) The ACMA removes a news source from a registered news business under subsection 52K(4) Details of the following: (a) the registered news business corporation that made the application under subsection 52K(1); (b) the registered news business (including details of the news source that was removed)News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Act 2026
(2) The notification must: (a) specify the day on which the event occurred; and (b) be given as soon as practicable after the event; and (c) if the notification is required to include details of a registered news business corporation—include details of the corporation’s point of contact (if any) set up for the purpose of section 52Z; and (d) if the notification is required to include details of a news business—include details of each of the news sources that comprise the news business.News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Act 2026
Context
Australia already had the News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code, which began on 3 March 2021 after the ACCC identified a bargaining-power imbalance between large digital platforms and news organisations. As journalism economics worsened and warnings emerged that the proposed incentive could cost jobs, the Government committed on 12 December 2024 to a News Bargaining Incentive, followed by the News Journalism Payment SchemeA program distributing collected money to eligible news organisations. and this accompanying Bill, which requires ACMA to keep eligibility information current; Parliament passed it on 20 August 2026 and Royal Assent followed on 26 August.
ACCC identifies a bargaining-power imbalance
The ACCC’s Digital Platforms Inquiry final report identified an imbalance between large digital platforms and Australian news organisations, setting the policy problem that later shaped the bargaining code.
News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) explanatory memorandum ↗The bargaining code commences
The News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code commenced to address the bargaining-power imbalance identified by the ACCC.
News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) explanatory memorandum ↗Government commits to the News Bargaining Incentive
The commitment aimed to encourage large digital platforms to renew or enter commercial deals that would support the sustainability of Australian news and journalism.
News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) explanatory memorandum ↗Job-loss warnings prompt changes to the incentive
The Government made eleventh-hour changes after warnings that its earlier proposal could cost journalism jobs, helping secure Coalition support for passage.
Australian Financial Review ↗Hon Anika Wells MP introduces the bill
The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives to accompany the scheme by requiring ACMA to report changes that could affect a news organisation’s eligibility or payment.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing the amendments needed alongside the News Journalism Payments Bill.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal Assent creates the Act
Royal Assent turned the bill into an Act, completing the legislative step for the ACMA notification rules to support payment-period eligibility decisions.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
Melissa McIntosh (Liberal) argued the wider payments package followed two years of delay and might provide less support than the previous system. She also questioned whether platform advertising revenue could be measured accurately and whether government-run funding would remain independent. Monique Ryan (Independent) argued artificial intelligence services were left outside the scheme. She also said the rules could still favour large publishers, noting that 35 per cent of roughly 200 Local & Independent News Association members — a network for small news publishers — fell below the $150,000 annual revenue threshold. Alex Antic (Liberal) argued the package would subsidise established media companies without ensuring money reached journalism.
Tom French (Labor) said the wider package encouraged direct deals, expected to deliver $225 million to $275 million a year, and included safeguards tied to journalism jobs. This particular bill is narrower: it mainly requires the Australian Communications and Media AuthorityThe regulator that registers eligible news businesses., the media regulator, to share registration information with the department running the scheme.
Small publishers could miss out
Without guaranteed access to platform deals and grants, funding could flow mainly to large media companies, worsening concentration and leaving small, independent and regional outlets behind.
Funding safeguards may be too weak
The scheme may raise less support than the former bargaining code unless the charge, revenue verification, oversight and funding transparency are strengthened.
AI services are outside the scheme
The framework may become outdated if AI companies can use Australian journalism without being required to compensate rights-holders.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.
Senate
Defeated 13 to 29. Support came from Greens, One Nation, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Liberal.
Because this was a second-reading statement rather than a change to the bill's text, its defeat left the legislation unchanged and declined to add the proposed position to the Senate's second-reading motion.
Defeated 23 to 35. Support came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents.
The defeat preserved the bill's existing definition of eligible editorial roles for determining participation in the news payment scheme.
Defeated 10 to 34. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, and Nationals.
The defeat retained the bill's existing eligibility, priority and funding-allocation rules instead of directing greater priority and a larger share of grants toward smaller organisations outside the main scheme.
Defeated 10 to 33. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, and One Nation.
The proposed change was not agreed.
The Senate carried Sarah Hanson-Young’s Australian Greens amendment on voices. It said the package left out artificial intelligence companies and called for urgent consultation on making them pay for journalistic work they use.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Wells supports the bill because its information-sharing amendments will help administer the News Journalism Payment SchemeA program distributing collected money to eligible news organisations. efficiently and support a sustainable, diverse and independent Australian media sector.
Read in Hansard ↗Antic opposes the bill because he considers it a disguised subsidy that protects declining legacy media incumbents instead of supporting smaller publishers, journalism, innovation and competitive digital markets.
Read in Hansard ↗Monique Ryan supports the reforms as an improvement that will strengthen Australian journalism, but argues they should cover AI services and direct more funding to small, independent and regional publishers.
Read in Hansard ↗Scamps supports the bill as part of an important package to make large digital platforms contribute to Australian journalism, while calling for stronger safeguards to ensure independent, regional and underrepresented publishers benefit and the scheme remains transparent and futureproof.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
14 speakers · 14 support
“The bill establishes the News Journalism Payment Scheme, which will distribute any revenue raised by the News Bargaining Incentive to eligible Australian news organisations, supporting a sustainable, diverse and independent news sector.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The design protects editorial independence, as ministers do not choose which stories deserve support. Payments follow clear rules linked to newsroom employment, registration and public interest news production. Government support for journalism must never purchase praise or soften scrutiny, and a strong and independent press will question every government, including this one. Labor believes work deserves fair pay, and journalism is highly skilled work the value of which does not vanish after a headline appears on a search page or a social feed. The news media bargaining bills put that principle into law.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills recognise that the digital economy has changed who captures the advertising revenue that once helped pay for journalism. They create a practical mechanism to encourage some of that value to flow back into Australian news. The amendment strengthens that mechanism. A 2.75 per cent charge provides a stronger incentive for commercial agreements, expected to deliver between $225 million and $275 million each year to Australian journalism. If platforms instead choose to pay the charge, that revenue will be returned to the Australian news sector. Either way, the objective is the same: more sustainable newsrooms, stronger local reporting and greater media diversity. That is good journalism. It is good for our communities. Even on those mornings when some of us might prefer not to admit it, it is good for democracy. I commend the bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The choice from here belongs to the platforms. They can sit down with Australian news businesses and reach agreements and put money into newsrooms, which is what our government wants and what these bills are built to produce, or they can decline, pay the charge and see it go to Australian journalism regardless. What is no longer available to them is the third course: taking the value of Australian news while contributing nothing toward the cost of producing it. That is a modest thing to ask of some of the largest companies in the world, and it is not a modest thing for newsrooms on the other side of it. A country that stops producing its own journalism does not stop consuming news. It consumes somebody else's news about itself produced elsewhere and accountable to nobody. It is the outcome these bills are written to avoid, and communities like mine will benefit greatly from what they seek to produce. I commend the bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills ensure digital platforms that benefit from Australian news contribute to its long-term sustainability. The government's approach is practical, market based and designed to support a sustainable, diverse and independent Australian news sector. These measures build on and strengthen the world-leading news media bargaining code, which has been in place since March 2021, ensuring it remains effective in a changing digital environment.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Governments are supposed to have their decisions scrutinised. Businesses should be scrutinised too, along with courts, councils, institutions and everyone else who exercises power in this country. For that to happen, Australia needs journalists who have the time and resources to do the work properly. Australia will be better for it. I commend the bill to the Senate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills ensure stability and a secure funding pipeline for Australian journalism, supporting commercial investment and returning incentive revenue to the secure. They will help to support a dynamic and diverse Australian news industry well into the future. I commend these bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Australian journalism underpins the work we do in this place. It gives people the information they need to judge us, question us and understand the decisions being made in their name. It is vital to our democracy and to who we are as a nation. Our Australian story should be told by Australian voices, Australian journalists and people who know our communities from the inside. If we want that story to survive the pull of the algorithm, we have to back the people who report it. We have to fund Australian journalism properly. That is why I'm proud to support legislation that does exactly that.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Together these bills reinforce the News Media Bargaining Code and support the sustainability and diversity of Australian journalism. They establish a clear principle that, where significant digital platforms derive enormous value from the Australian digital advertising market, they should have a strong incentive to reach commercial agreements with the Australian news organisations that produce journalism. From 1 January 2025 the News Bargaining Incentive will apply a charge equivalent to 2.75 per cent of Australian digital advertising revenue earned by significant search and social media services.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This government recognises that public interest journalism is a public good and is taking action to help build a stronger local media presence in Australia, made here in Australia by Australians, and the bill before the House serves to do just that. The government's approach is practical and allows for a market based approach designed to support a sustainable, diverse and independent Australian news sector. The measures build on and strengthen the world-leading News Media Bargaining Code, which has been in place since March 2021, ensuring that it remains effective in a changing digital environment. And it will apply a 2.5 per cent charge to Australian digital advertising revenue earned by significant search and social media services.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The framework in this bill creates strong incentives for negotiation and partnership. Platforms can reduce their liability by entering into eligible commercial agreements with Australian news businesses, rewarding direct investment in Australian journalism. This is a practical, market based approach that supports both innovation and accountability. The amendment before the House is modest in scale but significant in effect. By increasing the news bargaining incentive charge rate from 2.5 per cent to 2.75 per cent if a digital platform's advertising revenue is attributable to Australia, we are recognising how significantly digital and media markets have evolved since the original benchmark was established in 2021.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“To the digital platforms I say do the right thing and enter into commercial deals with our Aussie news publishers, and to my fellow senators I say support the bill, support commercial investment in Australian journalism and help a secure, sustainable, diverse and independent news media industry for the future.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The news media bargaining incentive bills incentivise commercial agreements between digital platforms and Australian news businesses, with platforms able to reduce their liability through eligible deals rather than pay the charge. We've introduced this because we believe Australians deserve access to news that is independent, diverse and locally produced.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The News Journalism Payment Scheme requires consequential amendments to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. These amendments are necessary to support the creation of the News Journalism Payment Scheme and its eligibility requirements. This bill provides those consequential amendments.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
7 speakers · 6 support · 1 oppose
“"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Nationals will not oppose this legislation, the News Journalism Payments Bill 2026 and cognate bills, in the House. We recognise the importance of securing ongoing support for Australian journalism. We recognise the need for a mechanism that encourages commercial agreements between digital platforms and Australian news journalism. We recognise that Australia's media sector continues to face significant economic pressures. Most importantly, we recognise that regional journalism cannot be left behind. But our lack of opposition does not mean a blank cheque. It does not mean pretending the legislation is perfect. It does not mean ignoring legitimate concerns about its operation. It means taking a constructive approach while continuing to fight for improvements.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So legislation is important. It is also vital that, to enhance the legislation, we adopt the amendments put forward by the shadow communications minister. But I say again: please, we need to help our newspapers in every which way. If you can buy a local newspaper and read it, you never know what you might find in it, and if we lose them, we'll be much the poorer as a society and as country communities.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is an important step forward in remedying the very significant vacuum over the last two years. We support funding for journalism, particularly regional journalism, which is vital for our democracy. We support a framework which encourages genuine commercial agreements rather than just dependence on government funding mechanisms. We are strongly committed to supporting Australian journalism and the importance of Australian stories being told by an Australian media sector, and I do hope that this package of bills does deliver what it's intended to do.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I support these bills. The coalition built the original code, and we want a scheme that works. But passing this legislation is not the achievement. Country Press Australia have put this well. The real test is whether it translates into genuine commercial agreements across a broad and diverse Australian news industry. If in two years time the platforms have done eight deals with the eight largest media companies in the country and the Shepparton News, the Riverine Herald, the Country News, the Seymour Telegraph, the Numurkah Leader and the Cobram Courier are in exactly the position they are in today then this parliament will have passed a law and changed nothing. So we owe it to them to make sure this legislation works in a way that saves local journalism and local news organisations and allows them to continue doing what they have done—holding governments to account, holding local institutions to account, telling the stories of the people who live in regional and rural Australia and facilitating the discussion that is going to move our beautiful parts of regional and rural Australia forward.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition remains committed to ensuring that those who derive significant value from Australian news contribute fairly to its production. We support sustainable funding for journalism, particularly for regional journalism, which is vital to our democracy, and a framework that encourages genuine commercial agreements rather than depending on government funding mechanisms. While we did not back the government's original proposal, we are pleased the coalition's work in rattling the cage has delivered a strengthened news incentive scheme with an increased charge of 2.75 per cent. The objective of these bills is clear: a strong, diverse and independent Australian media sector that can continue to serve Australians for generations to come.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I won't be supporting these bills. I ask that other colleagues also look past the rhetoric and ask the question that matters, which is who's actually getting the money and why are we protecting an industry that is demonstrably withering on the vine.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 support
“These bills are not perfect. There are elements that I think could have gone in a way that supported more independent and smaller players. But I've been pleased to help push the government to increase access for smaller players and independent players to these funds. The other problem we have in Australia is a very concentrated media landscape. The big players—News Corp, Nine, Seven West—dominate not just our television screens but the written word, the press and our radio waves. We need to find better and more important ways to support new players and media diversity in this country. I'll be keeping a very, very close eye on how this scheme rolls out.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
3 speakers · 3 support
“I believe that what the government is proposing is better than what we've had previously. It will promote sustainability and diversity of the Australian news media sector, but, without further refinements, many small and medium-sized publishers will struggle to access commercial agreements with digital platforms. I'm glad to see that the Albanese government has backflipped on a carve-out for professional networking sites, bringing Microsoft owned LinkedIn within the scope of this incentive, but the government has still chosen not to include AI companies in the incentive, and that is a significant regulatory gap.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The future of Australian journalism matters, because the future of Australian democracy depends on it. The measure of success cannot simply be how much money is raised. The measure of success must be whether that money produces more journalism, more journalists, more local reporting and more diverse voices. The government has made the important improvements to the legislation, but parliament must remain vigilant. We need safeguards to ensure that a meaningful share of commercial agreements goes to small and medium publishers; that the incentive for platforms to deal with those publishers is strong enough to overcome the imbalance in bargaining power; that a meaningful proportion of any levy revenue is directed towards independent, regional, multicultural and community journalism and the creation of new voices; that the scheme is transparent and independently evaluated; that the legislation is future proofed so that emerging technologies cannot simply exploit a new loophole; and that the government continues to monitor the impact of platform decisions on access to trusted news that Australians rely on. We should be ambitious about protecting the public interest by safeguarding Australian journalism and the vital role it plays in our democracy.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“With these amendments this bill will have a greater chance of throwing independent media a lifeline. I've put these amendments to the minister's office, and I implore the government to engage on them in good faith. This is important legislation to protect a vital part of our liberal democracy and social cohesion. I commend the bill with my proposed amendments to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.