News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments)

Current status

This bill became law on Aug 26th, 2026.

Policy area

Culture, sport & community

What does this bill do?

Registered news businesses will have registration changes reported to the department running the payment scheme.

Why was it introduced?

The government said the bill was needed so the department running the News Journalism Payment SchemeA program distributing collected money to eligible news organisations. could receive timely registration information and check who remained eligible for funding. It covers 10 types of registration, approval and news-source changes. The government said commercial broadcasters’ share of Australian advertising spending fell from 43 per cent in 2006 to 17 per cent in 2022 as advertising moved online. Consultation ran from 28 April to 18 May 2026 and received 56 submissions, of which 46 were published with permission.

Broader context

Australia already had the News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code, which began on 3 March 2021 after the ACCC identified a bargaining-power imbalance between large digital platforms and news organisations. As journalism economics worsened and warnings emerged that the proposed incentive could cost jobs, the Government committed on 12 December 2024 to a News Bargaining Incentive, followed by the News Journalism Payment SchemeA program distributing collected money to eligible news organisations. and this accompanying Bill, which requires ACMA to keep eligibility information current; Parliament passed it on 20 August 2026 and Royal Assent followed on 26 August.

Key criticism

Melissa McIntosh (Liberal) argued the wider payments package followed two years of delay and might provide less support than the previous system. She also questioned whether platform advertising revenue could be measured accurately and whether government-run funding would remain independent. Monique Ryan (Independent) argued artificial intelligence services were left outside the scheme. She also said the rules could still favour large publishers, noting that 35 per cent of roughly 200 Local & Independent News Association members — a network for small news publishers — fell below the $150,000 annual revenue threshold. Alex Antic (Liberal) argued the package would subsidise established media companies without ensuring money reached journalism.

Who supported it?

Hon Anika Wells MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in House 13 Aug 2026
Passed House 19 Aug 2026
Passed Senate 20 Aug 2026
Became law 26 Aug 2026

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 26 Aug 2026

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

4 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Passage speed

13 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Registered news businesses will have registration changes reported to the department running the payment scheme.

  2. Newly registered news businesses and their controlling companies will have their details shared with the department.

  3. News businesses that lose registration or approval will have the change and its reason reported to the department.

  4. News businesses that report an unmet rule or ownership change will have the relevant details passed to the department.

  5. News businesses that add or remove a news sourceAn outlet forming part of a registered news business. will have that change reported to the department.

  6. News businesses affected by a report will have the event date, news sources and available contact details included.

Show source excerpts
  1. 52PA Notification of Communications Secretary (1) The ACMA must: (a) notify the Communications Secretary if any of the events in column 1 of the following table occur; and (b) include the information in column 2 in the notification:
    News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Act 2026
  2. The ACMA registers a news business under paragraph 52G(1)(a) Details of the registered news business The ACMA registers a corporation under paragraph 52G(1)(b) Details of the registered news business corporation The ACMA endorses a registered news business corporation for a registered news business under paragraph 52G(1)(c) Details of the following: (a) the registered news business corporation; (b) the registered news business
    News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Act 2026
  3. The ACMA revokes the registration of a registered news business under subsection 52H(1), (2) or (3) or 52I(2) Details of the following: (a) the news business; (b) the registered news business corporation that was endorsed for the news business; (c) the reason for the revocation The ACMA revokes the registration of a registered news business corporation under subsection 52H(4) or (5) or 52I(2) Details of the following: (a) the corporation; (b) each news business for which the corporation was endorsed; (c) the reason for the revocation The ACMA revokes the endorsement of a registered n
    News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Act 2026
  4. A registered news business corporation gives the ACMA a notification under section 52J Details of the following: (a) the registered news business corporation; (b) if the notification under section 52J relates to a registered news business—that registered news business; (c) the requirement that was not met
    News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Act 2026
  5. The ACMA adds a news source to a registered news business under subsection 52K(3) Details of the following: (a) the registered news business corporation that made the application under subsection 52K(1); (b) the registered news business (including details of the news source that was added) The ACMA removes a news source from a registered news business under subsection 52K(4) Details of the following: (a) the registered news business corporation that made the application under subsection 52K(1); (b) the registered news business (including details of the news source that was removed)
    News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Act 2026
  6. (2) The notification must: (a) specify the day on which the event occurred; and (b) be given as soon as practicable after the event; and (c) if the notification is required to include details of a registered news business corporation—include details of the corporation’s point of contact (if any) set up for the purpose of section 52Z; and (d) if the notification is required to include details of a news business—include details of each of the news sources that comprise the news business.
    News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Act 2026

Broader context for this bill

Australia already had the News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code, which began on 3 March 2021 after the ACCC identified a bargaining-power imbalance between large digital platforms and news organisations. As journalism economics worsened and warnings emerged that the proposed incentive could cost jobs, the Government committed on 12 December 2024 to a News Bargaining Incentive, followed by the News Journalism Payment SchemeA program distributing collected money to eligible news organisations. and this accompanying Bill, which requires ACMA to keep eligibility information current; Parliament passed it on 20 August 2026 and Royal Assent followed on 26 August.

  1. 2019

    ACCC identifies a bargaining-power imbalance

    The ACCC’s Digital Platforms Inquiry final report identified an imbalance between large digital platforms and Australian news organisations, setting the policy problem that later shaped the bargaining code.

    News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) explanatory memorandum ↗
  2. 03 Mar 2021

    The bargaining code commences

    The News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code commenced to address the bargaining-power imbalance identified by the ACCC.

    News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) explanatory memorandum ↗
  3. 12 Dec 2024

    Government commits to the News Bargaining Incentive

    The commitment aimed to encourage large digital platforms to renew or enter commercial deals that would support the sustainability of Australian news and journalism.

    News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) explanatory memorandum ↗
  4. 13 Aug 2026

    Job-loss warnings prompt changes to the incentive

    The Government made eleventh-hour changes after warnings that its earlier proposal could cost journalism jobs, helping secure Coalition support for passage.

    Australian Financial Review ↗
  5. 13 Aug 2026

    Hon Anika Wells MP introduces the bill

    The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives to accompany the scheme by requiring ACMA to report changes that could affect a news organisation’s eligibility or payment.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  6. 20 Aug 2026

    Parliament passes the bill

    Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing the amendments needed alongside the News Journalism Payments Bill.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  7. 26 Aug 2026

    Royal Assent creates the Act

    Royal Assent turned the bill into an Act, completing the legislative step for the ACMA notification rules to support payment-period eligibility decisions.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 13 Aug 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 13 Aug 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 18 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

House second reading agreed 19 Aug 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House third reading agreed 19 Aug 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 20 Aug 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 20 Aug 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 20 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate second reading agreed 20 Aug 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Senate third reading agreed 20 Aug 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Passed both houses 20 Aug 2026

Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.

Finally passed both Houses

Assent 26 Aug 2026

The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.

The main case against this bill

Melissa McIntosh (Liberal) argued the wider payments package followed two years of delay and might provide less support than the previous system. She also questioned whether platform advertising revenue could be measured accurately and whether government-run funding would remain independent. Monique Ryan (Independent) argued artificial intelligence services were left outside the scheme. She also said the rules could still favour large publishers, noting that 35 per cent of roughly 200 Local & Independent News Association members — a network for small news publishers — fell below the $150,000 annual revenue threshold. Alex Antic (Liberal) argued the package would subsidise established media companies without ensuring money reached journalism.

Tom French (Labor) said the wider package encouraged direct deals, expected to deliver $225 million to $275 million a year, and included safeguards tied to journalism jobs. This particular bill is narrower: it mainly requires the Australian Communications and Media AuthorityThe regulator that registers eligible news businesses., the media regulator, to share registration information with the department running the scheme.

Small publishers could miss out

Without guaranteed access to platform deals and grants, funding could flow mainly to large media companies, worsening concentration and leaving small, independent and regional outlets behind.

Raised by Kate Chaney, Monique Ryan, Sam Birrell and Sophie Scamps Source ↗

Funding safeguards may be too weak

The scheme may raise less support than the former bargaining code unless the charge, revenue verification, oversight and funding transparency are strengthened.

Raised by Melissa McIntosh and Anne Webster Source ↗

AI services are outside the scheme

The framework may become outdated if AI companies can use Australian journalism without being required to compensate rights-holders.

Raised by Australian Greens and Monique Ryan Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

19 Aug 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

20 Aug 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Amendments at a glance

Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.

Senate

Defeated

Amendment to the news journalism payments package

Aye 13 No 29

Defeated 13 to 29. Support came from Greens, One Nation, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Liberal.

20 Aug 2026

Because this was a second-reading statement rather than a change to the bill's text, its defeat left the legislation unchanged and declined to add the proposed position to the Senate's second-reading motion.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 26
Greens 9 / 0
Liberal 0 / 3
One Nation 3 / 0
Independent 1 / 0
Defeated

Amendments to the news journalism payments package

Aye 23 No 35

Defeated 23 to 35. Support came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents.

20 Aug 2026

The defeat preserved the bill's existing definition of eligible editorial roles for determining participation in the news payment scheme.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 25
Liberal 17 / 0
Greens 0 / 9
One Nation 3 / 0
Nationals 2 / 0
Independent 0 / 1
Unknown 1 / 0
Defeated

Amendments to the news journalism payments package

Aye 10 No 34

Defeated 10 to 34. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, and Nationals.

20 Aug 2026

The defeat retained the bill's existing eligibility, priority and funding-allocation rules instead of directing greater priority and a larger share of grants toward smaller organisations outside the main scheme.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 25
Greens 9 / 0
Liberal 0 / 5
One Nation 0 / 3
Independent 1 / 0
Nationals 0 / 1
Defeated

Amendments to the news journalism payments package

Aye 10 No 33

Defeated 10 to 33. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, and One Nation.

20 Aug 2026

The proposed change was not agreed.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 26
Greens 9 / 0
Liberal 0 / 4
One Nation 0 / 3
Independent 1 / 0
Carried

Call for artificial intelligence companies to pay for journalism

The Senate carried Sarah Hanson-Young’s Australian Greens amendment on voices. It said the package left out artificial intelligence companies and called for urgent consultation on making them pay for journalistic work they use.

Carried on voices

The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.

These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Anika Wells

Australian Labor Party • MP 13 Aug 2026

Wells supports the bill because its information-sharing amendments will help administer the News Journalism Payment SchemeA program distributing collected money to eligible news organisations. efficiently and support a sustainable, diverse and independent Australian media sector.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead opposing voice Opposes

Alex Antic

Liberal Party • Senator 20 Aug 2026

Antic opposes the bill because he considers it a disguised subsidy that protects declining legacy media incumbents instead of supporting smaller publishers, journalism, innovation and competitive digital markets.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Monique Ryan

Independent • MP 18 Aug 2026

Monique Ryan supports the reforms as an improvement that will strengthen Australian journalism, but argues they should cover AI services and direct more funding to small, independent and regional publishers.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

Sophie Scamps

Independent • MP 18 Aug 2026

Scamps supports the bill as part of an important package to make large digital platforms contribute to Australian journalism, while calling for stronger safeguards to ensure independent, regional and underrepresented publishers benefit and the scheme remains transparent and futureproof.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

14 speakers · 14 support

  1. Murray Watt Watt supports the bill because it creates a transparent, formula-based scheme to direct revenue from the News Bargaining Incentive to eligible Australian news organisations and sustain diverse, independent journalism.
    “The bill establishes the News Journalism Payment Scheme, which will distribute any revenue raised by the News Bargaining Incentive to eligible Australian news organisations, supporting a sustainable, diverse and independent news sector.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 20 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Renee Coffey Coffey supports the bill because it helps ensure large digital platforms make a fair contribution to Australian journalism and directs funding toward newsroom jobs, smaller publishers, regional outlets and diverse communities.
    “The design protects editorial independence, as ministers do not choose which stories deserve support. Payments follow clear rules linked to newsroom employment, registration and public interest news production. Government support for journalism must never purchase praise or soften scrutiny, and a strong and independent press will question every government, including this one. Labor believes work deserves fair pay, and journalism is highly skilled work the value of which does not vanish after a headline appears on a search page or a social feed. The news media bargaining bills put that principle into law.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Tom French French supports the bill because it encourages large digital platforms to fund Australian journalism through commercial agreements or a charge, strengthening local reporting, sustainable newsrooms and media diversity.
    “These bills recognise that the digital economy has changed who captures the advertising revenue that once helped pay for journalism. They create a practical mechanism to encourage some of that value to flow back into Australian news. The amendment strengthens that mechanism. A 2.75 per cent charge provides a stronger incentive for commercial agreements, expected to deliver between $225 million and $275 million each year to Australian journalism. If platforms instead choose to pay the charge, that revenue will be returned to the Australian news sector. Either way, the objective is the same: more sustainable newsrooms, stronger local reporting and greater media diversity. That is good journalism. It is good for our communities. Even on those mornings when some of us might prefer not to admit it, it is good for democracy. I commend the bills to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Jo Briskey Briskey supports the bill because it closes the loophole allowing major digital platforms to avoid contributing by withdrawing news and directs funding towards journalists, especially in small, local and culturally diverse newsrooms.
    “The choice from here belongs to the platforms. They can sit down with Australian news businesses and reach agreements and put money into newsrooms, which is what our government wants and what these bills are built to produce, or they can decline, pay the charge and see it go to Australian journalism regardless. What is no longer available to them is the third course: taking the value of Australian news while contributing nothing toward the cost of producing it. That is a modest thing to ask of some of the largest companies in the world, and it is not a modest thing for newsrooms on the other side of it. A country that stops producing its own journalism does not stop consuming news. It consumes somebody else's news about itself produced elsewhere and accountable to nobody. It is the outcome these bills are written to avoid, and communities like mine will benefit greatly from what they seek to produce. I commend the bills to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Carol Berry Berry supports the bill because it will require the largest digital platforms to help sustain local and public interest journalism, protect journalism jobs and strengthen democratic accountability.
    “These bills ensure digital platforms that benefit from Australian news contribute to its long-term sustainability. The government's approach is practical, market based and designed to support a sustainable, diverse and independent Australian news sector. These measures build on and strengthen the world-leading news media bargaining code, which has been in place since March 2021, ensuring it remains effective in a changing digital environment.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Charlotte Walker Walker supports the bill, saying it will make large digital platforms contribute to Australian journalism and direct extra support to small, regional and diverse news organisations.
    “Governments are supposed to have their decisions scrutinised. Businesses should be scrutinised too, along with courts, councils, institutions and everyone else who exercises power in this country. For that to happen, Australia needs journalists who have the time and resources to do the work properly. Australia will be better for it. I commend the bill to the Senate.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 20 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. David Moncrieff Moncrieff supports the bills because they would make large digital platforms contribute to Australian journalism and provide stable funding for smaller, regional and diverse news outlets.
    “These bills ensure stability and a secure funding pipeline for Australian journalism, supporting commercial investment and returning incentive revenue to the secure. They will help to support a dynamic and diverse Australian news industry well into the future. I commend these bills to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Ash Ambihaipahar Ambihaipahar supports the bill because it requires major digital platforms benefiting from Australian news to help fund sustainable public-interest journalism, with added support for regional, small and diverse-community publishers.
    “Australian journalism underpins the work we do in this place. It gives people the information they need to judge us, question us and understand the decisions being made in their name. It is vital to our democracy and to who we are as a nation. Our Australian story should be told by Australian voices, Australian journalists and people who know our communities from the inside. If we want that story to survive the pull of the algorithm, we have to back the people who report it. We have to fund Australian journalism properly. That is why I'm proud to support legislation that does exactly that.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  9. Kate Thwaites Thwaites supports the bill as part of a package designed to sustain Australian journalism by encouraging major digital platforms to fund news organisations, with particular benefits for local, regional, independent and diverse outlets.
    “Together these bills reinforce the News Media Bargaining Code and support the sustainability and diversity of Australian journalism. They establish a clear principle that, where significant digital platforms derive enormous value from the Australian digital advertising market, they should have a strong incentive to reach commercial agreements with the Australian news organisations that produce journalism. From 1 January 2025 the News Bargaining Incentive will apply a charge equivalent to 2.75 per cent of Australian digital advertising revenue earned by significant search and social media services.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Basem Abdo Abdo supports the bill because it strengthens the news media bargaining framework, encourages digital platforms to fund Australian journalism and returns charge revenue to news organisations, with additional support for regional, remote and diverse-community outlets.
    “This government recognises that public interest journalism is a public good and is taking action to help build a stronger local media presence in Australia, made here in Australia by Australians, and the bill before the House serves to do just that. The government's approach is practical and allows for a market based approach designed to support a sustainable, diverse and independent Australian news sector. The measures build on and strengthen the world-leading News Media Bargaining Code, which has been in place since March 2021, ensuring that it remains effective in a changing digital environment. And it will apply a 2.5 per cent charge to Australian digital advertising revenue earned by significant search and social media services.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  11. Steve Georganas Georganas supports the bill as a practical, market-based way to secure fair commercial agreements between digital platforms and Australian news organisations, sustain local and regional journalism, and strengthen democratic accountability.
    “The framework in this bill creates strong incentives for negotiation and partnership. Platforms can reduce their liability by entering into eligible commercial agreements with Australian news businesses, rewarding direct investment in Australian journalism. This is a practical, market based approach that supports both innovation and accountability. The amendment before the House is modest in scale but significant in effect. By increasing the news bargaining incentive charge rate from 2.5 per cent to 2.75 per cent if a digital platform's advertising revenue is attributable to Australia, we are recognising how significantly digital and media markets have evolved since the original benchmark was established in 2021.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  12. Tammy Tyrrell Tyrrell urges senators to support the bill because it would make digital platforms help fund Australian journalism, including small, regional and diverse-community publishers, while strengthening media diversity and democratic accountability.
    “To the digital platforms I say do the right thing and enter into commercial deals with our Aussie news publishers, and to my fellow senators I say support the bill, support commercial investment in Australian journalism and help a secure, sustainable, diverse and independent news media industry for the future.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 20 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  13. Josh Dolega Dolega says the government supports the bill because it encourages digital platforms to make commercial agreements with Australian news businesses, helping sustain independent, diverse and locally produced journalism.
    “The news media bargaining incentive bills incentivise commercial agreements between digital platforms and Australian news businesses, with platforms able to reduce their liability through eligible deals rather than pay the charge. We've introduced this because we believe Australians deserve access to news that is independent, diverse and locally produced.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 20 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

7 speakers · 6 support · 1 oppose

  1. Melissa McIntosh McIntosh says the coalition will not block the bill, but argues the scheme needs strengthening because it may deliver less support than the former bargaining code and requires a higher charge, reliable revenue verification, and transparent funding safeguards.
    “"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:”

    Liberal Party • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Anne Webster Webster says the Nationals will not oppose the bill because ongoing support for Australian journalism, especially regional media, is necessary, but they will seek stronger incentives, oversight and funding certainty through amendments.
    “The Nationals will not oppose this legislation, the News Journalism Payments Bill 2026 and cognate bills, in the House. We recognise the importance of securing ongoing support for Australian journalism. We recognise the need for a mechanism that encourages commercial agreements between digital platforms and Australian news journalism. We recognise that Australia's media sector continues to face significant economic pressures. Most importantly, we recognise that regional journalism cannot be left behind. But our lack of opposition does not mean a blank cheque. It does not mean pretending the legislation is perfect. It does not mean ignoring legitimate concerns about its operation. It means taking a constructive approach while continuing to fight for improvements.”

    National Party • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Michael McCormack McCormack supports the bill as an important way to sustain regional newspapers and ensure publishers are paid for their journalism, but says amendments proposed by the shadow communications minister are needed to strengthen it.
    “So legislation is important. It is also vital that, to enhance the legislation, we adopt the amendments put forward by the shadow communications minister. But I say again: please, we need to help our newspapers in every which way. If you can buy a local newspaper and read it, you never know what you might find in it, and if we lose them, we'll be much the poorer as a society and as country communities.”

    National Party • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Sarah Henderson Henderson says the coalition supports the package as an important step towards making digital platforms pay fairly for Australian journalism, while criticising the government's delay and seeking stronger safeguards for grant distribution and a broader definition of editorial staff.
    “This is an important step forward in remedying the very significant vacuum over the last two years. We support funding for journalism, particularly regional journalism, which is vital for our democracy. We support a framework which encourages genuine commercial agreements rather than just dependence on government funding mechanisms. We are strongly committed to supporting Australian journalism and the importance of Australian stories being told by an Australian media sector, and I do hope that this package of bills does deliver what it's intended to do.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 20 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Sam Birrell Birrell supports the bills because they can restore funding from digital platforms to Australian newsrooms, but warns that success depends on securing broad commercial agreements that sustain regional and local journalism rather than benefiting only the largest media companies.
    “I support these bills. The coalition built the original code, and we want a scheme that works. But passing this legislation is not the achievement. Country Press Australia have put this well. The real test is whether it translates into genuine commercial agreements across a broad and diverse Australian news industry. If in two years time the platforms have done eight deals with the eight largest media companies in the country and the Shepparton News, the Riverine Herald, the Country News, the Seymour Telegraph, the Numurkah Leader and the Cobram Courier are in exactly the position they are in today then this parliament will have passed a law and changed nothing. So we owe it to them to make sure this legislation works in a way that saves local journalism and local news organisations and allows them to continue doing what they have done—holding governments to account, holding local institutions to account, telling the stories of the people who live in regional and rural Australia and facilitating the discussion that is going to move our beautiful parts of regional and rural Australia forward.”

    National Party • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Kerrynne Liddle Liddle says the coalition supports the strengthened news payments scheme because it makes major digital platforms contribute fairly to Australian journalism, particularly regional journalism, while criticising Labor for abandoning the previous bargaining code and excluding AI platforms.
    “The coalition remains committed to ensuring that those who derive significant value from Australian news contribute fairly to its production. We support sustainable funding for journalism, particularly for regional journalism, which is vital to our democracy, and a framework that encourages genuine commercial agreements rather than depending on government funding mechanisms. While we did not back the government's original proposal, we are pleased the coalition's work in rattling the cage has delivered a strengthened news incentive scheme with an increased charge of 2.75 per cent. The objective of these bills is clear: a strong, diverse and independent Australian media sector that can continue to serve Australians for generations to come.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 20 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Greens

1 speaker · 1 support

  1. Sarah Hanson-Young Hanson-Young supports the bills as a step towards sustaining public interest journalism, while arguing that they should do more for smaller independent outlets and must be followed by urgent measures forcing artificial intelligence companies to pay for journalistic work.
    “These bills are not perfect. There are elements that I think could have gone in a way that supported more independent and smaller players. But I've been pleased to help push the government to increase access for smaller players and independent players to these funds. The other problem we have in Australia is a very concentrated media landscape. The big players—News Corp, Nine, Seven West—dominate not just our television screens but the written word, the press and our radio waves. We need to find better and more important ways to support new players and media diversity in this country. I'll be keeping a very, very close eye on how this scheme rolls out.”

    Australian Greens • Senator • 20 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

3 speakers · 3 support

  1. Kate Chaney Kate Chaney supports the bill but proposes amendments to guarantee small publishers a share of platform deals, expand the grant pool and make independent outlets eligible for grants, warning that the current scheme could worsen media concentration.
    “With these amendments this bill will have a greater chance of throwing independent media a lifeline. I've put these amendments to the minister's office, and I implore the government to engage on them in good faith. This is important legislation to protect a vital part of our liberal democracy and social cohesion. I commend the bill with my proposed amendments to the House.”

    Independent • MP • 18 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat