Funding may favour incumbents
The scheme could subsidise dominant legacy media companies without ensuring enough funding reaches public-interest journalismReporting on matters important to the community. or smaller publishers.
This bill became law on Aug 26th, 2026.
Culture, sport & community
Registered Australian news businesses can receive money collected when large digital platforms pay the News Bargaining IncentiveA system encouraging platforms to fund news. charge instead of making deals.
The government said online advertising had weakened the business model supporting Australian journalism. Commercial broadcasters’ share of national advertising spending fell from 43 per cent in 2006 to 17 per cent in 2022. It said the News Bargaining IncentiveA system encouraging platforms to fund news., a system encouraging platforms to pay publishers directly, would return any charge revenue to journalism; existing platform-publisher deals were reportedly worth about $200 million to $250 million a year.
Australia already had the 2021 News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code, but digital advertising had moved towards large platforms, weakening the revenue base for local and public-interest journalismReporting on matters important to the community.; by mid-2025, regional mastheads such as the Shepparton News and Riverine Herald had reduced print editions. In April 2026, the Government announced the News Bargaining IncentiveA system encouraging platforms to fund news. to encourage platform deals and direct any charge revenue into journalism, and Hon Anika Wells MP introduced the payment scheme in August before Parliament passed it on 20 August.
Sarah Henderson (Liberal) argued the government had left publishers with more than two years of uncertainty after Meta stopped making deals in April 2024. She also wanted opinion and commentary roles included when newsroom staffing was counted. Alex Antic (Liberal) argued the scheme would favour large established media companies over smaller publishers. Sarah Hanson-Young (Greens) said it did not cover artificial-intelligence companies using journalists’ work without payment.
Hon Anika Wells MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 26 Aug 2026
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
6 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
13 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Registered Australian news businesses can receive money collected when large digital platforms pay the News Bargaining IncentiveA system encouraging platforms to fund news. charge instead of making deals.
News organisations receive a share based on their number of full-time-equivalent editorial workers, including eligible freelancers and volunteers.
Smaller publishers and outlets serving regional, remote or diverse communities receive a 20 per cent boost when their funding share is calculated.
Participating news businesses must maintain their eligible newsroom staffing and report reductions. Unjustified reductions can lead to money being recovered.
Very small publishers and start-ups can seek grants funded by 5 per cent of the money collected.
Australian Associated Press, a news service supplying other publishers, receives a separate 5 per cent allocation. It serves more than 400 publishers, including over 300 regional outlets.
Applicants can challenge key decisions through internal review. Some decisions can then go to the Administrative Review Tribunal, an independent review body.
The News Journalism Payment Scheme will distribute any revenue raised by the News Bargaining Incentive to eligible Australian news organisations. The Australian Communications and Media Authority administers the register of eligible news businesses under the news media bargaining code. News businesses will need to be registered to apply for a payment under the News Journalism Payment Scheme.Minister's second reading speech
Under the Scheme, there will be 2 payment periods following collection of any revenue through the NBI, which is collected following the end of each tax year. The payment periods are expected to commence each March and September, subject to there being minimum funding available. The payment amount provided to each eligible news corporation under the Scheme will be based on the corporation’s eligible editorial capacity, which is calculated as the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) editorial workers employed by the corporation, including freelancers and volunteer workers (conditions apply), whNews Journalism Payments explanatory memorandum
A 20 per cent increase will apply for journalists working in regional and remote areas, journalists employed by small to medium news organisations, and journalists working in news organisations that serve diverse communities. This recognises the challenges of employing staff in regional and remote Australia and the financial pressures experienced by small to medium publishers. It also supports publishers serving communities that are underrepresented in Australia's media landscape.Minister's second reading speech
The Bill imposes obligations on corporations that receive payments under the Scheme to maintain eligible editorial capacity in respect of the payment received across the relevant period, there are also obligations to notify the Secretary of relevant changes, including to notify the Secretary if they are no longer an eligible news corporation or if its eligible editorial capacity is reduced. The notification obligations for applicants are comprehensive. If the eligible editorial capacity is reduced during the period without reasonable cause or excuse and if no regulatory forbearance was exerciNews Journalism Payments explanatory memorandum
One of the clearest messages from consultation was that additional support is needed for very small publishers and start-ups seeking to establish core news services online. That need is particularly acute in areas where there is currently insufficient news coverage—often described as news deserts. This bill therefore provides for a special allocation of five per cent of any revenue raised by the News Bargaining Incentive for a separate grants program. That program will focus on supporting small publishers and start-ups to build their businesses and produce news for local communities.Minister's second reading speech
Australian Associated Press plays a unique and vital role in Australia's media landscape. Through its wholesale news service, AAP provides its newswire service to more than 400 Australian news publishers, with more than 300 of those located in regional areas. For many news organisations, particularly those with limited resources, AAP's reporting helps supplement local coverage and ensure Australians continue to have access to trusted news. That work delivers benefits well beyond any single publisher. AAP supports the production and distribution of quality journalism at scale, helping to strenMinister's second reading speech
The News Journalism Payment Scheme also allows for internal merits review of key decisions made by the Secretary that impact applicants and payment recipients (such as decisions to refuse an application, reduced capacity approvals, variations of approved capacity claims, payment share variations, exemption refusals and recoverable amount determinations). Following internal review, applicants may seek a further review on a select range of decisions by the Administrative Review Tribunal.News Journalism Payments explanatory memorandum
Context
Australia already had the 2021 News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code, but digital advertising had moved towards large platforms, weakening the revenue base for local and public-interest journalismReporting on matters important to the community.; by mid-2025, regional mastheads such as the Shepparton News and Riverine Herald had reduced print editions. In April 2026, the Government announced the News Bargaining IncentiveA system encouraging platforms to fund news. to encourage platform deals and direct any charge revenue into journalism, and Hon Anika Wells MP introduced the payment scheme in August before Parliament passed it on 20 August.
Australia establishes the News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code
The code created a mechanism for commercial bargaining between large digital platforms and Australian news businesses, but the later incentive package was designed to renew or extend that approach.
Treasury ↗Regional newspapers reduce print editions
The Shepparton News moved to two print days a week and the Riverine Herald to two editions, illustrating the local reporting capacity at risk as audiences and advertising shifted online.
Hansard ↗Government announces the News Bargaining IncentiveA system encouraging platforms to fund news.
The proposal would make large platforms contribute to Australian journalism through commercial deals or a charge, with revenue expected to be distributed to media organisations.
Treasury ↗Hon Anika Wells MP introduces the payment bill
The bill began its parliamentary journey by setting out how News Bargaining IncentiveA system encouraging platforms to fund news. revenue would be distributed to eligible Australian news organisations.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Parliament passes the bill
The passage, reported as a new levy on tech giants that fail to pay for local news, completed the package's funding pathway for the payment scheme.
Reuters ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
Sarah Henderson (Liberal) argued the government had left publishers with more than two years of uncertainty after Meta stopped making deals in April 2024. She also wanted opinion and commentary roles included when newsroom staffing was counted. Alex Antic (Liberal) argued the scheme would favour large established media companies over smaller publishers. Sarah Hanson-Young (Greens) said it did not cover artificial-intelligence companies using journalists’ work without payment.
The government said payments would follow newsroom staffing, with a 20 per cent boost for smaller and regional outlets. It also reserved separate funding for small publishers, start-ups and Australian Associated Press.
Funding may favour incumbents
The scheme could subsidise dominant legacy media companies without ensuring enough funding reaches public-interest journalismReporting on matters important to the community. or smaller publishers.
Safeguards and oversight may be too weak
Government-administered funding needed stronger safeguards, better verification of platform revenue and more certainty that the scheme would deliver adequate support.
AI platforms are excluded
The bill does not require AI services to pay for journalistic work, leaving a growing use of news content outside the scheme.
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Recorded amendment and procedural votes grouped by chamber. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.
House
Defeated 40 to 83. Support came from Liberal, Nationals, Community Strong Australia, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The House rejected the proposed amendment.
Defeated 11 to 69. Support came from Community Strong Australia, Greens, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Liberal.
The House rejected the proposed changes by 11 votes to 69, leaving the bill's existing grant arrangements intact.
Senate
Defeated 23 to 35. Support came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents.
The Senate rejected the proposed amendment.
Defeated 10 to 34. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, and Nationals.
The Senate rejected the proposed amendment.
Defeated 13 to 29. Support came from Greens, One Nation, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Liberal.
The proposed change was not agreed.
Defeated 10 to 33. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, and One Nation.
The Senate rejected the proposed amendment.
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Wells supports the bill because it will direct revenue from the News Bargaining IncentiveA system encouraging platforms to fund news. to Australian news organisations through a transparent funding scheme, with additional support for regional journalism, smaller publishers and start-ups.
Read in Hansard ↗Antic will not support the bill because he says it subsidises dominant legacy media companies, protects incumbents from market pressure and does not ensure funding reaches public interest journalism or smaller publishers.
Read in Hansard ↗Monique Ryan supports the bill as an improvement that will strengthen Australian journalism, but argues it should cover AI services and direct more funding to small, independent and regional publishers.
Read in Hansard ↗Sophie Scamps supports the bill as an important way to make major digital platforms fund Australian journalism, but urges stronger safeguards so small, independent, regional and underrepresented publishers receive a meaningful share and the scheme remains transparent and futureproof.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
14 speakers · 15 contributions · 14 support
“The principle is fair. A platform that derives its value from Australian news must help sustain it either through direct commercial agreements or by paying an incentive charge. The scheme recognises eligible good-faith agreements entered from 1 January 2025, allowing them to offset their news bargaining incentive liabilities from the commencement date. A platform can choose to pay the charge, but every dollar collected will return to the Australian news industry through the News Journalism Payment Scheme.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The choice from here belongs to the platforms. They can sit down with Australian news businesses and reach agreements and put money into newsrooms, which is what our government wants and what these bills are built to produce, or they can decline, pay the charge and see it go to Australian journalism regardless. What is no longer available to them is the third course: taking the value of Australian news while contributing nothing toward the cost of producing it. That is a modest thing to ask of some of the largest companies in the world, and it is not a modest thing for newsrooms on the other side of it. A country that stops producing its own journalism does not stop consuming news. It consumes somebody else's news about itself produced elsewhere and accountable to nobody. It is the outcome these bills are written to avoid, and communities like mine will benefit greatly from what they seek to produce. I commend the bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills ensure stability and a secure funding pipeline for Australian journalism, supporting commercial investment and returning incentive revenue to the secure. They will help to support a dynamic and diverse Australian news industry well into the future. I commend these bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Governments are supposed to have their decisions scrutinised. Businesses should be scrutinised too, along with courts, councils, institutions and everyone else who exercises power in this country. For that to happen, Australia needs journalists who have the time and resources to do the work properly. Australia will be better for it. I commend the bill to the Senate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills ensure digital platforms that benefit from Australian news contribute to its long-term sustainability. The government's approach is practical, market based and designed to support a sustainable, diverse and independent Australian news sector. These measures build on and strengthen the world-leading news media bargaining code, which has been in place since March 2021, ensuring it remains effective in a changing digital environment.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“If, in this environment, a platform chooses to pay the charge rather than enter into commercial agreements, that money will still support Australian journalism. The News Journalism Payments Bill establishes the News Journalism Payments scheme to distribute any revenue raised through the news bargaining incentive to eligible Australian news organisations. It's also important that it puts journalists themselves at the centre of how these payments are calculated. Eligible organisations will receive payments based on the number of journalists they employ, including freelancers. That includes journalists, photojournalists, videographers, data and visual journalists, editors and producers—all those directly involved in producing core news content. The more journalists an organisation employs, the greater its payment.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This government recognises that public interest journalism is a public good and is taking action to help build a stronger local media presence in Australia, made here in Australia by Australians, and the bill before the House serves to do just that. The government's approach is practical and allows for a market based approach designed to support a sustainable, diverse and independent Australian news sector. The measures build on and strengthen the world-leading News Media Bargaining Code, which has been in place since March 2021, ensuring that it remains effective in a changing digital environment. And it will apply a 2.5 per cent charge to Australian digital advertising revenue earned by significant search and social media services.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Australian journalism underpins the work we do in this place. It gives people the information they need to judge us, question us and understand the decisions being made in their name. It is vital to our democracy and to who we are as a nation. Our Australian story should be told by Australian voices, Australian journalists and people who know our communities from the inside. If we want that story to survive the pull of the algorithm, we have to back the people who report it. We have to fund Australian journalism properly. That is why I'm proud to support legislation that does exactly that.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill establishes the News Journalism Payment Scheme, which will distribute any revenue raised by the News Bargaining Incentive to eligible Australian news organisations, supporting a sustainable, diverse and independent news sector.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Tom French on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
French supports the bill as a practical way to make digital platforms fund Australian journalism, preferably through commercial agreements, and says the higher charge will strengthen local reporting, sustainable newsrooms and media diversity.
“These bills recognise that the digital economy has changed who captures the advertising revenue that once helped pay for journalism. They create a practical mechanism to encourage some of that value to flow back into Australian news. The amendment strengthens that mechanism. A 2.75 per cent charge provides a stronger incentive for commercial agreements, expected to deliver between $225 million and $275 million each year to Australian journalism. If platforms instead choose to pay the charge, that revenue will be returned to the Australian news sector. Either way, the objective is the same: more sustainable newsrooms, stronger local reporting and greater media diversity. That is good journalism. It is good for our communities. Even on those mornings when some of us might prefer not to admit it, it is good for democracy. I commend the bills to the House.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
French supports the bill because it makes very large digital platforms contribute to sustaining Australian journalism while encouraging them to reach commercial agreements with news businesses.
“Australia first responded to the imbalance between digital platforms and news businesses through the news media and digital platforms mandatory bargaining code in 2021. That framework helped produce commercial agreements between digital platforms and Australian media companies, but it had a weakness: a platform could potentially reduce or avoid bargaining obligations by simply reducing or removing news from its service. These bills address that problem. The principle is straightforward: if very large digital platforms derive substantial advertising revenue from their Australian operations, they should make a reasonable contribution towards sustaining Australian journalism.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“The News Journalism Payment Scheme will support a sustainable, diverse and independent media sector, and forms part of the broad package of Bills related to the News Bargaining Incentive.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The news media bargaining bills before the House represent an important step in addressing the challenge of how our media has changed. These bills are about supporting the long-term sustainability and diversity of Aussie journalism. They recognise a simple but important principle: when digital platforms derive significant value from news content, there should be a fair framework that helps support the journalism that creates that value. That's why this legislation encourages digital platforms and Australian news organisations to reach meaningful commercial agreements rather than relying solely on government intervention.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“To the digital platforms I say do the right thing and enter into commercial deals with our Aussie news publishers, and to my fellow senators I say support the bill, support commercial investment in Australian journalism and help a secure, sustainable, diverse and independent news media industry for the future.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The news media bargaining incentive bills incentivise commercial agreements between digital platforms and Australian news businesses, with platforms able to reduce their liability through eligible deals rather than pay the charge. We've introduced this because we believe Australians deserve access to news that is independent, diverse and locally produced.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
8 speakers · 6 support · 1 oppose · 1 unclear
“"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is an important step forward in remedying the very significant vacuum over the last two years. We support funding for journalism, particularly regional journalism, which is vital for our democracy. We support a framework which encourages genuine commercial agreements rather than just dependence on government funding mechanisms. We are strongly committed to supporting Australian journalism and the importance of Australian stories being told by an Australian media sector, and I do hope that this package of bills does deliver what it's intended to do.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So legislation is important. It is also vital that, to enhance the legislation, we adopt the amendments put forward by the shadow communications minister. But I say again: please, we need to help our newspapers in every which way. If you can buy a local newspaper and read it, you never know what you might find in it, and if we lose them, we'll be much the poorer as a society and as country communities.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I support these bills. The coalition built the original code, and we want a scheme that works. But passing this legislation is not the achievement. Country Press Australia have put this well. The real test is whether it translates into genuine commercial agreements across a broad and diverse Australian news industry. If in two years time the platforms have done eight deals with the eight largest media companies in the country and the Shepparton News, the Riverine Herald, the Country News, the Seymour Telegraph, the Numurkah Leader and the Cobram Courier are in exactly the position they are in today then this parliament will have passed a law and changed nothing. So we owe it to them to make sure this legislation works in a way that saves local journalism and local news organisations and allows them to continue doing what they have done—holding governments to account, holding local institutions to account, telling the stories of the people who live in regional and rural Australia and facilitating the discussion that is going to move our beautiful parts of regional and rural Australia forward.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition will not oppose these bills, but neither will we ignore their shortcomings. We are proud of the coalition's record in creating the original bargaining framework. We are disappointed that Labor took more than two years to replace it. We are determined to improve this legislation through practical amendments. Most importantly, we remain committed to preserving what really matters: a diverse media landscape, sustainable journalism, strong regional news services, thriving local voices and Australians equipped to think critically and engage actively in democratic life. Democracy depends on more than institutions. It depends on informed communities, it depends on local voices, and it depends on ensuring that Australian journalism continues to have a future.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition remains committed to ensuring that those who derive significant value from Australian news contribute fairly to its production. We support sustainable funding for journalism, particularly for regional journalism, which is vital to our democracy, and a framework that encourages genuine commercial agreements rather than depending on government funding mechanisms. While we did not back the government's original proposal, we are pleased the coalition's work in rattling the cage has delivered a strengthened news incentive scheme with an increased charge of 2.75 per cent. The objective of these bills is clear: a strong, diverse and independent Australian media sector that can continue to serve Australians for generations to come.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I won't be supporting these bills. I ask that other colleagues also look past the rhetoric and ask the question that matters, which is who's actually getting the money and why are we protecting an industry that is demonstrably withering on the vine.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We have some amazing journalists because we've got some amazing local newspapers who have mentored, trained, identified, fostered and developed that talent, and a number of those journalists are now working at a national and international level. I want to see a future for regional journalism in my area. I associate myself with the remarks of my very esteemed colleague the member for Riverina in his contribution.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 support
“These bills are not perfect. There are elements that I think could have gone in a way that supported more independent and smaller players. But I've been pleased to help push the government to increase access for smaller players and independent players to these funds. The other problem we have in Australia is a very concentrated media landscape. The big players—News Corp, Nine, Seven West—dominate not just our television screens but the written word, the press and our radio waves. We need to find better and more important ways to support new players and media diversity in this country. I'll be keeping a very, very close eye on how this scheme rolls out.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
3 speakers · 3 support
“I believe that what the government is proposing is better than what we've had previously. It will promote sustainability and diversity of the Australian news media sector, but, without further refinements, many small and medium-sized publishers will struggle to access commercial agreements with digital platforms. I'm glad to see that the Albanese government has backflipped on a carve-out for professional networking sites, bringing Microsoft owned LinkedIn within the scope of this incentive, but the government has still chosen not to include AI companies in the incentive, and that is a significant regulatory gap.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The future of Australian journalism matters, because the future of Australian democracy depends on it. The measure of success cannot simply be how much money is raised. The measure of success must be whether that money produces more journalism, more journalists, more local reporting and more diverse voices. The government has made the important improvements to the legislation, but parliament must remain vigilant. We need safeguards to ensure that a meaningful share of commercial agreements goes to small and medium publishers; that the incentive for platforms to deal with those publishers is strong enough to overcome the imbalance in bargaining power; that a meaningful proportion of any levy revenue is directed towards independent, regional, multicultural and community journalism and the creation of new voices; that the scheme is transparent and independently evaluated; that the legislation is future proofed so that emerging technologies cannot simply exploit a new loophole; and that the government continues to monitor the impact of platform decisions on access to trusted news that Australians rely on. We should be ambitious about protecting the public interest by safeguarding Australian journalism and the vital role it plays in our democracy.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“With these amendments this bill will have a greater chance of throwing independent media a lifeline. I've put these amendments to the minister's office, and I implore the government to engage on them in good faith. This is important legislation to protect a vital part of our liberal democracy and social cohesion. I commend the bill with my proposed amendments to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Consideration in detail debate
Consideration in detail
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.