Fair access for smaller publishers
The scheme may not direct enough funding to small, independent, regional, multicultural and First Nations news organisations without stronger eligibility, distribution and transparency safeguards.
This bill became law on Aug 26th, 2026.
Budget, tax & economy
Large platform groups owing the news media bargaining chargeA charge on covered large digital platforms. must lodge a charge return within six months after each financial year.
The government said online advertising had weakened news businesses while making large platforms important partners for reaching readers. The wider News Bargaining Incentive — a charge encouraging platforms to fund Australian journalism through deals — covers groups earning more than $250 million from relevant Australian digital advertising. The final charge rose from 2.5% to 2.75%, and the government expected deals to provide about $225 million to $275 million each year.
Australia already had a mandatory news-media bargaining code from 2 March 2021, but digital platforms had reshaped advertising economics and news consumption, weakening the commercial base for local and public-interest journalism; the government’s response to the code’s first-year review and its 2024–25 MYEFO commitment to support news and media diversity led to a new funding mechanism. The consequential bill supplied tax administration, collection and enforcement arrangements for the News Media Incentive, designed to encourage technology companies to make agreements with Australian news businesses, and became law after passage and Royal Assent.
Alex Antic (Liberal) argued the scheme would favour large, established media companies over independent publishers and podcasters. He said it lacked transparency and did not require payments to be spent on journalism. He also criticised charging platforms even when they stopped carrying news. Kerrynne Liddle (Liberal) said the government took more than two years to replace the earlier system and left artificial intelligence platforms outside the scheme.
Hon Dr Daniel Mulino MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 26 Aug 2026
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
Members called out ‘aye’ or ‘no’ — no individual votes were recorded.
Passage speed
13 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Large platform groups owing the news media bargaining chargeA charge on covered large digital platforms. must lodge a charge return within six months after each financial year.
Large platform groups must still lodge a return when deals with news businesses reduce their charge to zero.
Platform groups owing the charge must pay within 21 days after the Tax Commissioner sends their assessmentThe Tax Commissioner’s calculation of an amount owed..
Companies in a platform group generally share responsibility for paying amounts owed by their parent company.
Platforms paying the charge cannot claim it as a tax deduction.
Platforms can be charged interest when a revised assessmentThe Tax Commissioner’s calculation of an amount owed. increases their bill or an amount remains overdue.
Officials running journalism payments can receive protected tax information, but only to administer those payments.
(1) You must ensure the Commissioner is given a return, that relates to *news media bargaining charge and is in the *approved form, if: (a) you are liable to pay such charge under section 13 of the News Media Bargaining (Administration) Act 2026 for a financial year; or (b) you would be so liable to pay more than a nil amount were it not for Part 4 (about offsetting charge) of that Act. Note 1: A return must be given even if the amount of charge you are liable to pay is nil after applying offsets under Part 4 of that Act. Note 2: Paragraphs (a) and (b) mean the obligations in this sectionTreasury Laws Amendment (News Media Bargaining) (Consequential) Act 2026
(1) You must ensure the Commissioner is given a return, that relates to *news media bargaining charge and is in the *approved form, if: (a) you are liable to pay such charge under section 13 of the News Media Bargaining (Administration) Act 2026 for a financial year; or (b) you would be so liable to pay more than a nil amount were it not for Part 4 (about offsetting charge) of that Act. Note 1: A return must be given even if the amount of charge you are liable to pay is nil after applying offsets under Part 4 of that Act. Note 2: Paragraphs (a) and (b) mean the obligations in this sectionTreasury Laws Amendment (News Media Bargaining) (Consequential) Act 2026
129‑10 When news media bargaining charge and related charges are due and payable Original assessments (1) If you are liable to pay an amount of *news media bargaining charge for a financial year, the amount is due and payable 21 days after the day the Commissioner gives you a notice of assessment for the financial year.Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media Bargaining) (Consequential) Act 2026
129‑15 Additional liability of members of a service group (1) If an amount is payable as described in section 129‑10 by a parent entity (within the meaning of the News Media Bargaining (Administration) Act 2026) of a service group (within the meaning of that Act): (a) the parent entity; and (b) each other member of the service group (other than a member excluded by subsection (2)); are jointly and severally liable to pay the amount. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a member is excluded by this subsection if it is, at the time the amount becomes due and payable, prohibited accordingTreasury Laws Amendment (News Media Bargaining) (Consequential) Act 2026
5 In the appropriate position in Division 26 26‑120 News media bargaining charge cannot be deducted You cannot deduct under this Act an amount of *news media bargaining charge that you pay. 6 Subsection 995‑1(1) news media bargaining charge means charge imposed by the News Media Bargaining Charge Act 2026.Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media Bargaining) (Consequential) Act 2026
(2) If the Commissioner amends your assessment of an amount of *news media bargaining charge, any extra charge resulting from the amendment is due and payable 21 days after the day the Commissioner gives you notice of the amended assessment. Shortfall interest charge (3) If you are liable to pay an amount of *shortfall interest charge under section 280‑102G, the amount is due and payable 21 days after the day the Commissioner gives you notice of the charge. General interest charge (4) If an amount of: (a) *news media bargaining charge; or (b) *shortfall interest charge; payable under thTreasury Laws Amendment (News Media Bargaining) (Consequential) Act 2026
19 Subsection 355‑65(8) in Schedule 1 (at the end of the table) the Secretary of the Department administered by the Minister administering the News Journalism Payments Act 2026 is for the purpose of administering that Act.Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media Bargaining) (Consequential) Act 2026
Context
Australia already had a mandatory news-media bargaining code from 2 March 2021, but digital platforms had reshaped advertising economics and news consumption, weakening the commercial base for local and public-interest journalism; the government’s response to the code’s first-year review and its 2024–25 MYEFO commitment to support news and media diversity led to a new funding mechanism. The consequential bill supplied tax administration, collection and enforcement arrangements for the News Media Incentive, designed to encourage technology companies to make agreements with Australian news businesses, and became law after passage and Royal Assent.
Australia’s news media bargaining code begins
The mandatory code began governing commercial relationships between Australian news businesses and designated digital platforms with significant bargaining power.
ACCC ↗Government responds to the code’s first-year review
The government supported the review’s five recommendations, including stronger monitoring of digital platforms and bargaining-power imbalances.
Treasury ↗Government commits to supporting news and media diversity
The News Media Incentive, Administration Bill and Consequential Amendments Bill were identified as collectively implementing the Supporting News and Media Diversity measure.
Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media Bargaining) (Consequential) explanatory memorandum ↗Government announces a higher levy for technology companies without news deals
ABC reported that the proposed levy would apply to digital advertising revenue and increase for technology companies that failed to reach content agreements with Australian news organisations.
ABC News ↗Hon Dr Daniel Mulino MP introduces the consequential bill
Dr Mulino said the bill accompanied the News Media Bargaining (Administration) Bill by providing tax-law arrangements needed to administer, collect and enforce the News Media Incentive.
Hansard ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both Houses passed the bill in the same form, completing the parliamentary passage needed for the consequential arrangements to proceed.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal Assent makes the bill an Act
The Governor-General granted Royal Assent, with the consequential provisions tied to commencement of the Administration Bill and the incentive applying from the 2025–26 financial year.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Independent review is due after three years of operation
The framework requires an independent review of the Administration Bill and News Media Incentive Bill to test whether the incentive is operating as intended.
Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media Bargaining) (Consequential) explanatory memorandum ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
Alex Antic (Liberal) argued the scheme would favour large, established media companies over independent publishers and podcasters. He said it lacked transparency and did not require payments to be spent on journalism. He also criticised charging platforms even when they stopped carrying news. Kerrynne Liddle (Liberal) said the government took more than two years to replace the earlier system and left artificial intelligence platforms outside the scheme.
Tammy Tyrrell (Labor) said agreements were expected to provide $225 million to $275 million for journalism each year. She said collected charges would return to the news industry, with 5% reserved for grants to small publishers and start-ups.
Fair access for smaller publishers
The scheme may not direct enough funding to small, independent, regional, multicultural and First Nations news organisations without stronger eligibility, distribution and transparency safeguards.
Artificial intelligence excluded
Artificial intelligence companies could continue using Australian journalists’ and creators’ work without being required by the scheme to pay rights-holders.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.
Senate
The Senate carried Sarah Hanson-Young’s amendment on voices. It acknowledged that artificial intelligence platforms were not covered and called for urgent consultation on ways to make them pay for journalistic work they use.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Mulino urges passage of the bill because its consequential amendments are needed to administer, collect and enforce the News Bargaining Incentive and thereby support a sustainable and diverse Australian news media sector.
Read in Hansard ↗Antic opposes the bill, arguing that it subsidises dominant legacy media companies without ensuring funding reaches public interest journalism or smaller publishers, while protecting incumbents from competition and market decline.
Read in Hansard ↗Sophie Scamps supports the bill as part of the news bargaining package, arguing that major digital platforms should contribute to Australian journalism.
Read in Hansard ↗Kate Chaney supports the bill as important protection for journalism and democracy, but argues it should be amended to ensure small, independent, regional, multicultural and First Nations news organisations receive a fair share of funding.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
11 speakers · 11 support
“The bill establishes the News Journalism Payment Scheme, which will distribute any revenue raised by the News Bargaining Incentive to eligible Australian news organisations, supporting a sustainable, diverse and independent news sector.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The design protects editorial independence, as ministers do not choose which stories deserve support. Payments follow clear rules linked to newsroom employment, registration and public interest news production. Government support for journalism must never purchase praise or soften scrutiny, and a strong and independent press will question every government, including this one. Labor believes work deserves fair pay, and journalism is highly skilled work the value of which does not vanish after a headline appears on a search page or a social feed. The news media bargaining bills put that principle into law.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The choice from here belongs to the platforms. They can sit down with Australian news businesses and reach agreements and put money into newsrooms, which is what our government wants and what these bills are built to produce, or they can decline, pay the charge and see it go to Australian journalism regardless. What is no longer available to them is the third course: taking the value of Australian news while contributing nothing toward the cost of producing it. That is a modest thing to ask of some of the largest companies in the world, and it is not a modest thing for newsrooms on the other side of it. A country that stops producing its own journalism does not stop consuming news. It consumes somebody else's news about itself produced elsewhere and accountable to nobody. It is the outcome these bills are written to avoid, and communities like mine will benefit greatly from what they seek to produce. I commend the bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Governments are supposed to have their decisions scrutinised. Businesses should be scrutinised too, along with courts, councils, institutions and everyone else who exercises power in this country. For that to happen, Australia needs journalists who have the time and resources to do the work properly. Australia will be better for it. I commend the bill to the Senate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills ensure stability and a secure funding pipeline for Australian journalism, supporting commercial investment and returning incentive revenue to the secure. They will help to support a dynamic and diverse Australian news industry well into the future. I commend these bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Australian journalism underpins the work we do in this place. It gives people the information they need to judge us, question us and understand the decisions being made in their name. It is vital to our democracy and to who we are as a nation. Our Australian story should be told by Australian voices, Australian journalists and people who know our communities from the inside. If we want that story to survive the pull of the algorithm, we have to back the people who report it. We have to fund Australian journalism properly. That is why I'm proud to support legislation that does exactly that.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills recognise that the digital economy has changed who captures the advertising revenue that once helped pay for journalism. They create a practical mechanism to encourage some of that value to flow back into Australian news. The amendment strengthens that mechanism. A 2.75 per cent charge provides a stronger incentive for commercial agreements, expected to deliver between $225 million and $275 million each year to Australian journalism. If platforms instead choose to pay the charge, that revenue will be returned to the Australian news sector. Either way, the objective is the same: more sustainable newsrooms, stronger local reporting and greater media diversity. That is good journalism. It is good for our communities. Even on those mornings when some of us might prefer not to admit it, it is good for democracy. I commend the bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The framework in this bill creates strong incentives for negotiation and partnership. Platforms can reduce their liability by entering into eligible commercial agreements with Australian news businesses, rewarding direct investment in Australian journalism. This is a practical, market based approach that supports both innovation and accountability. The amendment before the House is modest in scale but significant in effect. By increasing the news bargaining incentive charge rate from 2.5 per cent to 2.75 per cent if a digital platform's advertising revenue is attributable to Australia, we are recognising how significantly digital and media markets have evolved since the original benchmark was established in 2021.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“To the digital platforms I say do the right thing and enter into commercial deals with our Aussie news publishers, and to my fellow senators I say support the bill, support commercial investment in Australian journalism and help a secure, sustainable, diverse and independent news media industry for the future.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The news media bargaining incentive bills incentivise commercial agreements between digital platforms and Australian news businesses, with platforms able to reduce their liability through eligible deals rather than pay the charge. We've introduced this because we believe Australians deserve access to news that is independent, diverse and locally produced.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“They are an important component needed to effectively deliver the policy objective to support the sustainability and diversity of Australia's news media sector.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
5 speakers · 3 support · 1 oppose · 1 unclear
“So legislation is important. It is also vital that, to enhance the legislation, we adopt the amendments put forward by the shadow communications minister. But I say again: please, we need to help our newspapers in every which way. If you can buy a local newspaper and read it, you never know what you might find in it, and if we lose them, we'll be much the poorer as a society and as country communities.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is an important step forward in remedying the very significant vacuum over the last two years. We support funding for journalism, particularly regional journalism, which is vital for our democracy. We support a framework which encourages genuine commercial agreements rather than just dependence on government funding mechanisms. We are strongly committed to supporting Australian journalism and the importance of Australian stories being told by an Australian media sector, and I do hope that this package of bills does deliver what it's intended to do.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition remains committed to ensuring that those who derive significant value from Australian news contribute fairly to its production. We support sustainable funding for journalism, particularly for regional journalism, which is vital to our democracy, and a framework that encourages genuine commercial agreements rather than depending on government funding mechanisms. While we did not back the government's original proposal, we are pleased the coalition's work in rattling the cage has delivered a strengthened news incentive scheme with an increased charge of 2.75 per cent. The objective of these bills is clear: a strong, diverse and independent Australian media sector that can continue to serve Australians for generations to come.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I won't be supporting these bills. I ask that other colleagues also look past the rhetoric and ask the question that matters, which is who's actually getting the money and why are we protecting an industry that is demonstrably withering on the vine.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We have some amazing journalists because we've got some amazing local newspapers who have mentored, trained, identified, fostered and developed that talent, and a number of those journalists are now working at a national and international level. I want to see a future for regional journalism in my area. I associate myself with the remarks of my very esteemed colleague the member for Riverina in his contribution.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 support
“These bills are not perfect. There are elements that I think could have gone in a way that supported more independent and smaller players. But I've been pleased to help push the government to increase access for smaller players and independent players to these funds. The other problem we have in Australia is a very concentrated media landscape. The big players—News Corp, Nine, Seven West—dominate not just our television screens but the written word, the press and our radio waves. We need to find better and more important ways to support new players and media diversity in this country. I'll be keeping a very, very close eye on how this scheme rolls out.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 2 support
“The future of Australian journalism matters, because the future of Australian democracy depends on it. The measure of success cannot simply be how much money is raised. The measure of success must be whether that money produces more journalism, more journalists, more local reporting and more diverse voices. The government has made the important improvements to the legislation, but parliament must remain vigilant. We need safeguards to ensure that a meaningful share of commercial agreements goes to small and medium publishers; that the incentive for platforms to deal with those publishers is strong enough to overcome the imbalance in bargaining power; that a meaningful proportion of any levy revenue is directed towards independent, regional, multicultural and community journalism and the creation of new voices; that the scheme is transparent and independently evaluated; that the legislation is future proofed so that emerging technologies cannot simply exploit a new loophole; and that the government continues to monitor the impact of platform decisions on access to trusted news that Australians rely on. We should be ambitious about protecting the public interest by safeguarding Australian journalism and the vital role it plays in our democracy.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“With these amendments this bill will have a greater chance of throwing independent media a lifeline. I've put these amendments to the minister's office, and I implore the government to engage on them in good faith. This is important legislation to protect a vital part of our liberal democracy and social cohesion. I commend the bill with my proposed amendments to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.