Cash Distribution Framework

Current status

This bill became law on Aug 26th, 2026.

Policy area

Budget, tax & economy

What does this bill do?

Major cash transport and processing businesses can be placed under special oversight by the Reserve Bank of AustraliaAustralia’s central bank., the nation’s central bank.

Why was it introduced?

Daniel Mulino (Labor) said declining cash use was making cash harder to store, process and transport profitably. He said many Australians, especially people in regional areas, could face real hardship if cash became difficult to access. The government also wanted to support its cash acceptance mandate — rules requiring certain fuel and grocery retailers to accept in-person cash payments up to $500 between 7am and 9pm.

Broader context

As online payments expanded, Australia’s cash system faced pressure to remain available and affordable for people and businesses that still relied on notes and coins, while major banks explored a joint cash pool for distribution. Treasury consulted on exposure-draft legislation from April to May 2026, then Daniel Mulino MP introduced the framework on 2 July; Parliament passed it on 20 August to keep cash moving and prepare for failures in critical distribution services.

Key criticism

Senator Matthew Canavan, speaking for the Opposition, argued the government had acted too slowly. His proposed Senate amendment said risks had been clear since the competition regulator approved the Armaguard–Prosegur merger in June 2023. It said the system neared crisis by Easter 2024 and action came shortly before an enforceable undertaking — a legally binding commitment — was due to expire in September 2026. The Opposition also criticised the lack of a plan for regional bank branches after the closure pause ends on 31 July 2027.

Who supported it?

Daniel Mulino MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in House 02 July 2026
Passed House 12 Aug 2026
Passed Senate 20 Aug 2026
Became law 26 Aug 2026

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 26 Aug 2026

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

3 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Passage speed

55 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Major cash transport and processing businesses can be placed under special oversight by the Reserve Bank of AustraliaAustralia’s central bank., the nation’s central bank.

  2. Businesses using cash distribution services get rules for fair negotiations, clear pricing and resolving disputes. The competition regulator can approve standard contract termsPre-approved conditions for cash service agreements..

  3. People and businesses relying on cash gain service standards set by the competition regulator. These can cover whether services are available and delivered on time.

  4. Critical cash service providers can be directed by the Reserve Bank when their services or finances are at risk.

  5. Cash users are protected during a provider crisis. The Reserve Bank can appoint a manager or transfer the provider’s business or shares.

  6. Critical cash services can receive up to $400 million in government support for each crisis. This funding is a last resort.

  7. Cash transport workers cannot have their employment benefits reduced through the Reserve Bank’s crisis action. Replacement workers doing the same job receive the same protection.

Show source excerpts
  1. The framework has three key elements. The first provides powers to the Reserve Bank to designate entities that have a significant role in the cash system, or those that provide critical cash distribution services. Limiting regulation to critical entities will keep the framework proportionate, targeting areas of greatest benefit while avoiding unnecessary burden on smaller providers or new entrants that do not provide critical services.
    Second reading speech
  2. The second enables the ACCC to oversee designated entities, including fair and efficient pricing of cash distribution services, which is essential to maintaining access to cash. ACCC oversight will support fair, transparent and reasonable pricing outcomes, while helping maintain the long-term economic viability of the sector. The bill creates obligations for designated entities when negotiating cash distribution service and access agreements, and allows the ACCC to approve standard terms for classes of agreements. It also establishes arbitration to resolve negotiation disputes and enables t
    Second reading speech
  3. The ACCC is also empowered to establish service-level standards to support fair and reliable access to cash across Australia. These standards may cover factors such as availability and timeliness, with the ACCC having regard to the bill's objects and the public interest.
    Second reading speech
  4. Triggers for crisis resolution powers The RBA must only exercise a crisis resolution power after at least one condition for resolution has been met. The conditions broadly relate to a designated entity’s ability to continue to provide cash distribution services that are critical to the availability of cash in Australia or the designated entity’s financial viability. If any of the following conditions are met in relation to a designated entity, the RBA may exercise its crisis resolution powers: a designated entity requests the RBA’s assistance, and the RBA reasonably believes that an event i
    Cash Distribution Framework explanatory memorandum
  5. When a condition for resolution has been met, the RBA may access its resolution powers, which include: appointing a statutory manager to the designated entity or a related body corporate; initiating the transfer of business or shares of a designated entity (and related bodies corporate) to a third party; issuing directions. These resolution powers are designed to enable the RBA to step in when a designated entity is in crisis, minimise disruption and maintain confidence in Australia’s cash distribution system. They are supported by strong safeguards, including clearly defined triggers, ove
    Cash Distribution Framework explanatory memorandum
  6. The Treasurer, with the written approval of the Finance Minister, is permitted to activate a maximum appropriation of up to $400 million per event to maintain the vital functions of a designated entity during a crisis. The Treasurer can only make an authorisation if one or more crisis conditions in section 90 of the Bill are satisfied.[Definition of ‘Finance Minister’ in section 5, subsection 160(1) and section 161 of the Bill] This authorisation must specify the amount of funds, that does not exceed $400 million per event, authorised to be drawn down from the appropriation. The initial appro
    Cash Distribution Framework explanatory memorandum
  7. (1) Page 164 (after line 4), after Subdivision A, insert: Subdivision AA—Protections for employees 162A Powers must not be exercised to lessen employee entitlements The Reserve Bank must not take action in accordance with this Part in relation to a designated entity if: (a) the action would result in the entitlements of an employee of the designated entity being less beneficial than they were immediately before the action was taken; or (b) each of the following are satisfied: (i) there is an employee (the current employee) of the designated entity immediately before the action is taken;
    Proposed amendment 5: CW - Australian Greens [sheet 3967]

Broader context for this bill

As online payments expanded, Australia’s cash system faced pressure to remain available and affordable for people and businesses that still relied on notes and coins, while major banks explored a joint cash pool for distribution. Treasury consulted on exposure-draft legislation from April to May 2026, then Daniel Mulino MP introduced the framework on 2 July; Parliament passed it on 20 August to keep cash moving and prepare for failures in critical distribution services.

  1. 16 July 2025

    Online payments accelerate, putting pressure on cash distribution

    Bloomberg reported that the growth of online payments was prompting Australia to consider reforms to keep cash distribution viable for people who still use it.

    Bloomberg ↗
  2. 22 Apr–13 May 2026

    Treasury consults on cash distribution reforms

    Treasury opened consultation on exposure-draft legislation, signalling a move towards formal safeguards for cash availability, access and distribution.

    Treasury ↗
  3. 29 May 2026

    Major banks propose a joint cash pool

    ANZ, CBA, NAB and Westpac lodged an ACCCAustralia’s competition and consumer protection regulator. application for authorisation covering a proposed joint cash pool, making the structure of cash supply a live regulatory issue.

    ACCC ↗
  4. 02 July 2026

    Daniel Mulino MP introduces the bill

    Daniel Mulino MP introduced the bill in the House of Representatives, linking the proposed safeguards to Australians’ choice to use cash and to resilience during emergencies and outages.

    Hansard ↗
  5. 20 Aug 2026

    Parliament passes the bill

    Both Houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage and leaving the framework ready for commencement after Royal Assent.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 02 July 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 02 July 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Economics review 02 July 2026

Referred to Committee (02/07/2026): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (07/08/2026)

Report tabled 07 Aug 2026

APH bill page notes
Second reading debate 11 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Sent to Federation Chamber for debate 12 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step. For this bill, the Federation Chamber reported back later the same day and the House then completed its remaining formal steps that day.

Referred to Federation Chamber

Federation Chamber debate 12 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate

Returned from Federation Chamber without amendment 12 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step. The official House record shows the referral out and return both happened on the same day, before the House moved to its final formal votes.

Reported from Federation Chamber

House second reading agreed 12 Aug 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House agreed to amendments 12 Aug 2026

The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.

Consideration in detail debate

House third reading agreed 12 Aug 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber. Later message exchanges with the other chamber were still recorded afterwards.

Third reading agreed to

Scrutiny of Bills review 12 Aug 2026

Considered by scrutiny committee (12/08/2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 9 of 2026

Scrutiny Digest 9 of 2026

APH bill page notes
Introduced 17 Aug 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 17 Aug 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 17 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate second reading agreed 20 Aug 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Senate agreed to amendments 20 Aug 2026

The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.

Third reading agreed to :

Consideration of Senate message 20 Aug 2026

The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form. The main accepted Senate changes reflected in the final bill were: The introduced and as-passed bill texts differ in 20 observed text blocks. Observed text changed from "…rvice agreements and access agreements 16 Division 1—Preliminary 16 18 Simplified outline of this Part 16 Division 2—Re…" to "…rvice agreements and access agreements 15 Division 1—Preliminary 15 18 Simplified outline of this Part 15 Division 2—Re…".

Passed both houses 20 Aug 2026

Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.

Finally passed both Houses

Assent 26 Aug 2026

The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.

The main case against this bill

Senator Matthew Canavan, speaking for the Opposition, argued the government had acted too slowly. His proposed Senate amendment said risks had been clear since the competition regulator approved the Armaguard–Prosegur merger in June 2023. It said the system neared crisis by Easter 2024 and action came shortly before an enforceable undertaking — a legally binding commitment — was due to expire in September 2026. The Opposition also criticised the lack of a plan for regional bank branches after the closure pause ends on 31 July 2027.

Daniel Mulino (Labor) said the framework followed recommendations from financial regulators and would protect people who rely on cash. He said limiting oversight to critical providers would avoid unnecessary burdens on smaller businesses and new competitors.

Taxpayer-funded rescue

Critics warned that the crisis provisions could shift up to $400 million of costs from banks to taxpayers without repairing the underlying commercial model.

Raised by Former ACTU secretary Bill Kelty and Cash Welcome founder Jayson Bryce Source ↗

Reliability and worker safety

Jayson Bryce argued that cutting distribution costs too far could produce unreliable and insecure services, while unions reported cash being carried by single-person crews in ordinary vehicles despite robbery risks.

Raised by Cash Welcome founder Jayson Bryce and the Transport Workers Union Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

12 Aug 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

20 Aug 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Amendments at a glance

Amendments grouped by chamber. Where APH reports aggregate counts, the package card summarizes the matching public amendment sheets by source theme.

House

Defeated

Criticise delays protecting access to cash

Aye 40 No 83

Defeated 40 to 83. Support came from Liberal, Nationals, One Nation, Community Strong Australia, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor.

12 Aug 2026

The House rejected the statement by 40 votes to 83, then agreed to the bill’s second reading.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 83
Liberal 20 / 0
Nationals 11 / 0
Independent 6 / 0
One Nation 2 / 0
Community Strong Australia 1 / 0
Carried

Coordinate cash-service rules with workplace orders

Aye 84 No 34

Passed 84 to 34. Support came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal and Nationals. Community Strong Australia had split recorded votes.

20 Aug 2026

The House agreed to the Senate’s change by 84 votes to 34, allowing the bill to pass both chambers in the same form.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 79 / 0
Liberal 0 / 21
Nationals 0 / 12
Independent 3 / 0
Community Strong Australia 1 / 1
Greens 1 / 0
Carried

Government package: 23 amendments

Government amendments add cash-related contractual chain orders to the bill’s definitions and exceptions, extend consultation requirements and regulatory considerations, and correct technical wording for the cash-in-transit industry.

12 Aug 2026

Passed on the voices

The chamber agreed to this amendment package without a counted vote. APH records the agreed count by amendment, while the source documents are grouped into amendment sheets.

Themes in the public amendment sheets

Senate

Carried

Protect workers during a cash-provider crisis

Aye 34 No 26

Passed 34 to 26. Support came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and Liberal Party.

20 Aug 2026

The Senate agreed to the proposed amendment.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 24 / 0
Liberal 0 / 19
Greens 9 / 0
One Nation 0 / 3
Nationals 0 / 3
Independent 1 / 0
Liberal Party 0 / 1
Carried

Criticise delays protecting access to cash

The Senate carried the amendment on voices. It raised concerns about delayed government action, cash-system risks and regional bank closures.

Carried on voices

The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.

These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Daniel Mulino

Australian Labor Party • MP 02 July 2026

Mulino supports the bill because it would keep cash accessible and distribution services viable, especially for regional communities, older Australians, small businesses and people who depend on cash during emergencies.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

1 speaker · 1 support

Full record

Full chat