Taxpayer-funded rescue
Critics warned that the crisis provisions could shift up to $400 million of costs from banks to taxpayers without repairing the underlying commercial model.
This bill became law on Aug 26th, 2026.
Budget, tax & economy
Major cash transport and processing businesses can be placed under special oversight by the Reserve Bank of AustraliaAustralia’s central bank., the nation’s central bank.
Daniel Mulino (Labor) said declining cash use was making cash harder to store, process and transport profitably. He said many Australians, especially people in regional areas, could face real hardship if cash became difficult to access. The government also wanted to support its cash acceptance mandate — rules requiring certain fuel and grocery retailers to accept in-person cash payments up to $500 between 7am and 9pm.
As online payments expanded, Australia’s cash system faced pressure to remain available and affordable for people and businesses that still relied on notes and coins, while major banks explored a joint cash pool for distribution. Treasury consulted on exposure-draft legislation from April to May 2026, then Daniel Mulino MP introduced the framework on 2 July; Parliament passed it on 20 August to keep cash moving and prepare for failures in critical distribution services.
Senator Matthew Canavan, speaking for the Opposition, argued the government had acted too slowly. His proposed Senate amendment said risks had been clear since the competition regulator approved the Armaguard–Prosegur merger in June 2023. It said the system neared crisis by Easter 2024 and action came shortly before an enforceable undertaking — a legally binding commitment — was due to expire in September 2026. The Opposition also criticised the lack of a plan for regional bank branches after the closure pause ends on 31 July 2027.
Daniel Mulino MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 26 Aug 2026
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
3 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
55 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Major cash transport and processing businesses can be placed under special oversight by the Reserve Bank of AustraliaAustralia’s central bank., the nation’s central bank.
Businesses using cash distribution services get rules for fair negotiations, clear pricing and resolving disputes. The competition regulator can approve standard contract termsPre-approved conditions for cash service agreements..
People and businesses relying on cash gain service standards set by the competition regulator. These can cover whether services are available and delivered on time.
Critical cash service providers can be directed by the Reserve Bank when their services or finances are at risk.
Cash users are protected during a provider crisis. The Reserve Bank can appoint a manager or transfer the provider’s business or shares.
Critical cash services can receive up to $400 million in government support for each crisis. This funding is a last resort.
Cash transport workers cannot have their employment benefits reduced through the Reserve Bank’s crisis action. Replacement workers doing the same job receive the same protection.
The framework has three key elements. The first provides powers to the Reserve Bank to designate entities that have a significant role in the cash system, or those that provide critical cash distribution services. Limiting regulation to critical entities will keep the framework proportionate, targeting areas of greatest benefit while avoiding unnecessary burden on smaller providers or new entrants that do not provide critical services.Second reading speech
The second enables the ACCC to oversee designated entities, including fair and efficient pricing of cash distribution services, which is essential to maintaining access to cash. ACCC oversight will support fair, transparent and reasonable pricing outcomes, while helping maintain the long-term economic viability of the sector. The bill creates obligations for designated entities when negotiating cash distribution service and access agreements, and allows the ACCC to approve standard terms for classes of agreements. It also establishes arbitration to resolve negotiation disputes and enables tSecond reading speech
The ACCC is also empowered to establish service-level standards to support fair and reliable access to cash across Australia. These standards may cover factors such as availability and timeliness, with the ACCC having regard to the bill's objects and the public interest.Second reading speech
Triggers for crisis resolution powers The RBA must only exercise a crisis resolution power after at least one condition for resolution has been met. The conditions broadly relate to a designated entity’s ability to continue to provide cash distribution services that are critical to the availability of cash in Australia or the designated entity’s financial viability. If any of the following conditions are met in relation to a designated entity, the RBA may exercise its crisis resolution powers: a designated entity requests the RBA’s assistance, and the RBA reasonably believes that an event iCash Distribution Framework explanatory memorandum
When a condition for resolution has been met, the RBA may access its resolution powers, which include: appointing a statutory manager to the designated entity or a related body corporate; initiating the transfer of business or shares of a designated entity (and related bodies corporate) to a third party; issuing directions. These resolution powers are designed to enable the RBA to step in when a designated entity is in crisis, minimise disruption and maintain confidence in Australia’s cash distribution system. They are supported by strong safeguards, including clearly defined triggers, oveCash Distribution Framework explanatory memorandum
The Treasurer, with the written approval of the Finance Minister, is permitted to activate a maximum appropriation of up to $400 million per event to maintain the vital functions of a designated entity during a crisis. The Treasurer can only make an authorisation if one or more crisis conditions in section 90 of the Bill are satisfied.[Definition of ‘Finance Minister’ in section 5, subsection 160(1) and section 161 of the Bill] This authorisation must specify the amount of funds, that does not exceed $400 million per event, authorised to be drawn down from the appropriation. The initial approCash Distribution Framework explanatory memorandum
(1) Page 164 (after line 4), after Subdivision A, insert: Subdivision AA—Protections for employees 162A Powers must not be exercised to lessen employee entitlements The Reserve Bank must not take action in accordance with this Part in relation to a designated entity if: (a) the action would result in the entitlements of an employee of the designated entity being less beneficial than they were immediately before the action was taken; or (b) each of the following are satisfied: (i) there is an employee (the current employee) of the designated entity immediately before the action is taken;Proposed amendment 5: CW - Australian Greens [sheet 3967]
Context
As online payments expanded, Australia’s cash system faced pressure to remain available and affordable for people and businesses that still relied on notes and coins, while major banks explored a joint cash pool for distribution. Treasury consulted on exposure-draft legislation from April to May 2026, then Daniel Mulino MP introduced the framework on 2 July; Parliament passed it on 20 August to keep cash moving and prepare for failures in critical distribution services.
Online payments accelerate, putting pressure on cash distribution
Bloomberg reported that the growth of online payments was prompting Australia to consider reforms to keep cash distribution viable for people who still use it.
Bloomberg ↗Treasury consults on cash distribution reforms
Treasury opened consultation on exposure-draft legislation, signalling a move towards formal safeguards for cash availability, access and distribution.
Treasury ↗Major banks propose a joint cash pool
ANZ, CBA, NAB and Westpac lodged an ACCCAustralia’s competition and consumer protection regulator. application for authorisation covering a proposed joint cash pool, making the structure of cash supply a live regulatory issue.
ACCC ↗Daniel Mulino MP introduces the bill
Daniel Mulino MP introduced the bill in the House of Representatives, linking the proposed safeguards to Australians’ choice to use cash and to resilience during emergencies and outages.
Hansard ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both Houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage and leaving the framework ready for commencement after Royal Assent.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Referred to Committee (02/07/2026): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (07/08/2026)
Report tabled 07 Aug 2026
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step. For this bill, the Federation Chamber reported back later the same day and the House then completed its remaining formal steps that day.
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step. The official House record shows the referral out and return both happened on the same day, before the House moved to its final formal votes.
Reported from Federation Chamber
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber. Later message exchanges with the other chamber were still recorded afterwards.
Third reading agreed to
Considered by scrutiny committee (12/08/2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 9 of 2026
Scrutiny Digest 9 of 2026
APH bill page notesThe bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Third reading agreed to :
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form. The main accepted Senate changes reflected in the final bill were: The introduced and as-passed bill texts differ in 20 observed text blocks. Observed text changed from "…rvice agreements and access agreements 16 Division 1—Preliminary 16 18 Simplified outline of this Part 16 Division 2—Re…" to "…rvice agreements and access agreements 15 Division 1—Preliminary 15 18 Simplified outline of this Part 15 Division 2—Re…".
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
Senator Matthew Canavan, speaking for the Opposition, argued the government had acted too slowly. His proposed Senate amendment said risks had been clear since the competition regulator approved the Armaguard–Prosegur merger in June 2023. It said the system neared crisis by Easter 2024 and action came shortly before an enforceable undertaking — a legally binding commitment — was due to expire in September 2026. The Opposition also criticised the lack of a plan for regional bank branches after the closure pause ends on 31 July 2027.
Daniel Mulino (Labor) said the framework followed recommendations from financial regulators and would protect people who rely on cash. He said limiting oversight to critical providers would avoid unnecessary burdens on smaller businesses and new competitors.
Taxpayer-funded rescue
Critics warned that the crisis provisions could shift up to $400 million of costs from banks to taxpayers without repairing the underlying commercial model.
Reliability and worker safety
Jayson Bryce argued that cutting distribution costs too far could produce unreliable and insecure services, while unions reported cash being carried by single-person crews in ordinary vehicles despite robbery risks.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Amendments grouped by chamber. Where APH reports aggregate counts, the package card summarizes the matching public amendment sheets by source theme.
House
Defeated 40 to 83. Support came from Liberal, Nationals, One Nation, Community Strong Australia, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor.
The House rejected the statement by 40 votes to 83, then agreed to the bill’s second reading.
Passed 84 to 34. Support came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal and Nationals. Community Strong Australia had split recorded votes.
The House agreed to the Senate’s change by 84 votes to 34, allowing the bill to pass both chambers in the same form.
Government amendments add cash-related contractual chain orders to the bill’s definitions and exceptions, extend consultation requirements and regulatory considerations, and correct technical wording for the cash-in-transit industry.
Passed on the voices
The chamber agreed to this amendment package without a counted vote. APH records the agreed count by amendment, while the source documents are grouped into amendment sheets.
Senate
Passed 34 to 26. Support came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and Liberal Party.
The Senate agreed to the proposed amendment.
The Senate carried the amendment on voices. It raised concerns about delayed government action, cash-system risks and regional bank closures.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Mulino supports the bill because it would keep cash accessible and distribution services viable, especially for regional communities, older Australians, small businesses and people who depend on cash during emergencies.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
1 speaker · 1 support
“The bill keeps cash available for the people and businesses who rely on it, while building a stronger and more resilient payments system. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Reported from Federation Chamber
Reported from Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Consideration in detail: amendments considered
Amendments agreed
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Amendments considered
Amendments agreed
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
House · Consideration of Senate message
Consideration of Senate message
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.
Senate Economics Legislation Committee
Report tabled 07 Aug 2026
Referred to Committee (2 July 2026): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (7 Aug 2026)
APH bill page notesSenate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills
Scrutiny Digest 9 of 2026
Considered by scrutiny committee (12 Aug 2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 9 of 2026
APH bill page notes