Monopoly and cost risks
The market rules and crisis-funding arrangements could reinforce a dominant provider and leave businesses or the public facing excessive costs.
This bill became law on Aug 26th, 2026.
Budget, tax & economy
Cash-service customers can receive continued or new services on prices and terms set temporarily by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, the competition watchdog.
The government said falling cash use was making storage, processing and transport harder to fund, while many Australians would face hardship without cash. A Labor speaker cited the Reserve Bank's 2025 Consumer Payments Survey: cash made up about 15 per cent of payments, about half of Australians used it weekly, and about one-third expected hardship or major inconvenience if access became difficult. The bill supplies a 24-month bridge while the wider framework begins; that companion framework includes up to $400 million per crisis to keep critical cash services operating.
Australia had already required certain large grocery and fuel retailers to accept cash from 1 January 2026, while cash remained important for roughly one in ten Australians and declining use put pressure on the economics of distributing it. After regulators’ July 2025 consultation found that critical cash services needed safeguards, this bill supplied temporary ACCC powers to keep services and access arrangements in place as the new framework was due to start, and it received Royal Assent on 26 August 2026.
Kevin Hogan (National Party) argued the government acted too late. He said one merged provider controlled 85 to 90 per cent of the market and had sought another $190 million over three years. He also pointed to a $50 million rescue package and said the bill did not address regional bank closures or require pharmacies to accept cash. Malcolm Roberts (One Nation) argued the framework could entrench the dominant provider and said the test for accessing up to $400 million in crisis funding was too low.
Daniel Mulino MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 26 Aug 2026
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
1 recorded amendment or procedural vote was found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
55 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Cash-service customers can receive continued or new services on prices and terms set temporarily by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, the competition watchdog. This power lasts 24 months.
People who rely on cash are protected from serious supply risks during the transition. The competition watchdog can act only when cash availability or critical distribution services may be materially affected.
Cash-distribution providers face penalties for disobeying a temporary direction. The maximum starts at 50,000 penalty units for companies and 5,000 for individuals, or three times the benefit gained.
Cash-transport workers keep protections set through road transport contractual chain orders, which set minimum standards across transport contracting arrangements. The competition watchdog must consider relevant orders when using its temporary powers.
Customers with an existing agreement made before their provider was officially brought under the framework generally keep that agreement. A temporary direction does not override it unless the agreement is later changed.
Cash-service providers and regulators can share protected information when it helps enforce the framework. The Reserve Bank of Australia, the central bank, must use its powers to support cash availability.
transition period means the period of 24 months beginning on the day this Schedule commences. (2) An expression used in a provision of this Schedule and in the new Act has the same meaning in that provision as it has in the new Act. 2 Interim power for ACCC to give directions while cash distribution framework is being implemented (1) During the transition period, the ACCC may, by legislative instrument, give a designated entity a direction (an interim direction) requiring the designated entity to provide cash distribution services or facilities access to a customer on terms (including termsCash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) as-passed text
3 Procedural matters for giving interim directions (1) The ACCC must not give an interim direction unless the ACCC reasonably believes that giving the direction is appropriate to manage or respond to a risk or potential risk of circumstances arising during the transition period that could have a material effect on: (a) the availability of cash in Australia; or (b) the continued provision of cash distribution services that are critical to the availability of cash in Australia.Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) as-passed text
Failure to comply with an interim direction (1) A designated entity is liable to a civil penalty if: (a) an interim direction applies to the designated entity; and (b) the designated entity fails to comply with the interim direction. Note 1: An individual may be liable for an ancillary contravention of this civil penalty provision (see section 92 of the Regulatory Powers Act). Note 2: There is an exception to this civil penalty provision in section 195A (interactions with cash‑related contractual chain orders) of the new Act, as modified by subitem 8(2) of this Schedule. Civil penalty:Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) as-passed text
(1A) In giving, varying or revoking an interim direction, the ACCC: (a) must have regard to any relevant cash‑related contractual chain orders; and (b) may consult the Fair Work Commission or the Fair Work Ombudsman in relation to interactions with any such orders.Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) as-passed text
(2) An interim direction does not apply to a designated entity, in relation to the designated entity’s provision of a cash distribution service or facilities access to a customer, to the extent that: (a) there is in force a service agreement or access agreement between the designated entity and the customer for the provision of that service or access; andCash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) as-passed text
16 After paragraph 10B(1)(d) (da) to ensure the Bank’s functions and powers under the cash distribution framework are performed and exercised in a way that, in the Board’s opinion, best contributes to the availability of cash (as defined by the Cash Distribution Framework Act 2026) in Australia; andCash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) as-passed text
Context
Australia had already required certain large grocery and fuel retailers to accept cash from 1 January 2026, while cash remained important for roughly one in ten Australians and declining use put pressure on the economics of distributing it. After regulators’ July 2025 consultation found that critical cash services needed safeguards, this bill supplied temporary ACCC powers to keep services and access arrangements in place as the new framework was due to start, and it received Royal Assent on 26 August 2026.
Regulators call for safeguards for critical cash services
The Council of Financial Regulators and the ACCC concluded their consultation by recommending safeguards to support an accessible, sustainable and resilient cash distribution system.
Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum ↗Cash acceptance mandate begins
Certain grocery and fuel retailers began having to accept in-person cash payments of up to $500 between 7am and 9pm, increasing the importance of reliable cash distribution.
Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum ↗Major banks propose a joint cash pool
ANZ, Commonwealth Bank, NAB and Westpac lodged an ACCC authorisation application for a proposed joint venture and cash pool covering cash supply arrangements.
ACCC ↗Daniel Mulino MP introduces the bill
The bill was introduced to provide temporary safeguards for cash distribution while the new regulatory framework was being established.
Hansard ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage of the transitional cash-distribution measures.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal Assent completes the bill
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act that could commence alongside the main cash distribution framework.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Referred to Committee (02/07/2026): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (07/08/2026)
Report tabled 07 Aug 2026
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step. For this bill, the Federation Chamber reported back later the same day and the House then completed its remaining formal steps that day.
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Second reading debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step. The official House record shows the referral out and return both happened on the same day, before the House moved to its final formal votes.
Reported from Federation Chamber
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Considered by scrutiny committee (12/08/2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 9 of 2026
Scrutiny Digest 9 of 2026
APH bill page notesThe bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
Kevin Hogan (National Party) argued the government acted too late. He said one merged provider controlled 85 to 90 per cent of the market and had sought another $190 million over three years. He also pointed to a $50 million rescue package and said the bill did not address regional bank closures or require pharmacies to accept cash. Malcolm Roberts (One Nation) argued the framework could entrench the dominant provider and said the test for accessing up to $400 million in crisis funding was too low.
Both speakers supported the bills overall. The government said regulation was needed because falling cash use was weakening the distribution business, while cash remained important during emergencies and outages.
Monopoly and cost risks
The market rules and crisis-funding arrangements could reinforce a dominant provider and leave businesses or the public facing excessive costs.
Framework leaves access gaps
The measures do not directly stop bank branch closures or comprehensively protect cash use, and concerns were also raised about support for post offices and access to medicines.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Amendments grouped by chamber. Where APH reports aggregate counts, the package card summarizes the matching public amendment sheets by source theme.
House
Government amendments require the ACCC to consider relevant cash-related contractual chain orders when issuing, varying or revoking interim directions, permit consultation with workplace regulators, and make related drafting clarifications.
Passed on the voices
The chamber agreed to this amendment package without a counted vote. APH records the agreed count by amendment, while the source documents are grouped into amendment sheets.
Senate
Passed 34 to 26. Support came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and minor parties and independents.
The change added employment protections to the cash-distribution framework, limiting how the Reserve Bank could restructure a designated entityA provider formally covered by the framework. during a crisis.
The Senate added the opposition's statement criticising delays and the lack of a plan for regional bank closures. It did not reject the bills.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The Senate agreed to an amendment on voices. The division record does not identify its narrower subject.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Mulino supports the consequential amendments bill because it provides transitional arrangements, including an interim ACCC power to maintain cash distribution servicesMoving, storing, processing or packaging cash. while the broader framework is implemented.
Read in Hansard ↗Susan McDonald supports protecting access to and use of cash, especially during outages and natural disasters, but does not clearly state whether she supports the consequential amendments bill and criticises the broader framework for failing to cover medicines.
Read in Hansard ↗Roberts says One Nation supports the bill because its framework can protect and restore cash distribution, particularly in regional areas, but he criticises gaps in support for post offices and warns that its crisis funding and market rules could entrench a monopoly or impose excessive costs.
Read in Hansard ↗Rebekha Sharkie supports the bill because it protects reliable access to cash, particularly for regional communities, older Australians, small businesses and people affected by digital exclusion or emergencies.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
15 speakers · 17 contributions · 15 support
“The accompanying Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill ensures that the transition to the new framework is equally well managed. Schedule 2 provides the ACCC with temporary directions powers, should a significant risk to cash access arise during implementation. Those powers are deliberately limited. They expire after 24 months and exist solely to bridge the gap, while longer-term commercial arrangements are established under the new framework. This legislation also complements the government's broader reforms protecting cash access. The cash acceptance mandate, which commenced on 1 January 2026, requires eligible supermarkets and fuel retailers to accept cash for transactions up to $500 during standard trading hours. Protecting the right to pay with cash is only meaningful if businesses themselves can obtain notes and coins. Alongside commitments from the major banks to pause further regional bank closures, together with strengthened investments in Bank@Post, these reforms form part of a broader strategy to ensure Australians retain access to essential banking services regardless of where they live.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills are about keeping the system available. They recognise the way Australians' pay is changing. They do not try and stop the change, but they also recognise that progress does not require us to abandon people who still rely on cash. They support fair and transparent pricing. They provide minimum service standards. They give businesses a pathway to resolve disputes. They provide the Reserve Bank with tools to respond if a critical provider is in serious trouble. These amendments make an important clarification: the new framework must work alongside Australia's industrial relations system, not cut across it—and the road transport contractual chain orders exist for that reason. I commend the bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill protects choice. It keeps an essential service working in the public interest. From the tooth fairy to marketplace, from small businesses to school fundraisers, cash remains part of the moments that shape families and bring communities together. Behind those moments sit a national system. Labor is making that system fairer. Labor is making it stronger. Labor is making sure progress carries people with it. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“That's why the transitional arrangements contained in the Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026 are equally important. These provisions will ensure that, during the introduction of the new framework, safeguards remain firmly in place. As I said earlier, it gives the ACCC temporary powers to intervene where there is a significant risk to ongoing cash access, creating an important bridge between the current system and long-term arrangements established by the legislation. At its core, the bill recognises a simple reality, and that reality is that, while Australia's payment system may continue to evolve—and it will evolve—the government has a responsibility to ensure that those who rely on cash are not left behind, whether it's the pensioner paying for their groceries, the small business managing daily transactions or the family living in a regional community where digital alternatives are not always there or not always reliable. Australians deserve confidence that cash will remain available when they need it, and that is exactly what this legislation seeks to secure.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The bill itself is intended to support the ongoing sustainability of the cash distribution system, but there are additional amendments because the bill itself is not intended to supersede industrial relations laws, including the road transport contractual chain orders, which set minimum standards for people in road transport contractual chains to ensure operators are safe, sustainable and viable. In most instances, the cash distribution framework contained in the contractual chain orders will not overlap, given these regimes target different policy outcomes. However, in the event that the two regimes do have some overlap or conflict, the proposed amendments provide a pathway for resolving that conflict. These changes ensure that requirements of the Fair Work Commission set out in a road transport contractual chain order are appropriately protected and address concerns about potential regulatory ambiguity. The amendments require the ACCC to consider a relevant contractual chain order when setting, varying or revoking approved standard terms and service-level standards or when exercising interim powers. The amendments will support those outcomes. The amendments also require the ACCC to have various roles in it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026 and the Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026 are designed for this purpose to ensure that Australians have access to cash for as long as they want to use it, because, while we have to embrace new technology with gusto, we cannot leave Australians who still want to use cash behind. The Albanese Labor government is committed to protecting Australians' access to cash and by extension protecting people's rights to choose how they pay for goods and services. While the modernisation of payment systems has been rapid and has certainly aided in productivity and ease of payment for many, it is important to us that no-one is left behind.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is a measured answer to a real problem. It's not a step back from the digital future. It is a way of making sure that the future leaves no-one stranded at the check-out. It sits alongside the cash our shops must now accept, and it backs the supply of cash that Tasmanians and Australians rely on every day. Therefore, I support this bill and the amendments.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It forms part of our broader agenda to safeguard the use of cash well into the future along with reforms to Australia's payments system, the cash mandate introduced earlier this year and ongoing work to ensure sustainable access to regional bank branches. It's a bill in the best Labor traditions of inclusion, choice and fairness. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“As payment methods change and the digital age becomes even more entrenched, the Albanese Labor government is acting to ensure the marketplace is available and accessible to everyone, not just to those who can easily adapt to the digital marketplace. This bill protects not only vulnerable Australians but all Australians and Australian businesses by ensuring the availability of cash and shoring up the cash distribution and payment system so it enjoys long-term resilience and sustainability. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The government is committed to safeguarding Australians by ensuring continued access to cash and recognising its essential role in our society in law. That is why the government introduced the cash acceptance mandate, which came into effect on 1 January this year. It is enforced by the ACCC and requires major grocery and motor fuel retailers to accept cash for everyday transactions of $500 or less during regular business hours. This is a commonsense measure that protects small businesses by exempting those with a turnover of less than $10 million, unless they share a trademark with a larger retailer. While the cash acceptance mandate is working as intended, we need to ensure that no-one is left behind in the payment system. With the introduction of the Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026, the government is taking the next step and delivering on its commitment to maintaining cash for as long as Australians want to use it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Access is not something you legislate once and move on from. It is something that you keep on building into every part of government. This includes something as ordinary as how people actually pay for their groceries. Cash is an important part of the Australian economy. We will make sure that all communities continue to have access to this. Because of these amazing changes, I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Australians across all demographic groups continue to use cash as a way to make their everyday payments. But now cash distribution is under threat. Declining transactional cash use is placing pressure on the economics of storing, processing and transporting cash around the country. Industry consolidation, as the member for Riverina mentioned, and structural changes mean that it's time that regulations change as well. Our government is committed to giving a fair go to all Australians. Maintaining reasonable access to cash to withdraw and to deposit services for Australians who want or need to use cash is part of keeping that commitment. It's why we're acting to ensure Australians have access to cash. No matter what part of the country you live in, you should be able to go and get your groceries, your meat and veg, and just hand over a couple of pineapples. This is why I'm proud to support these bills.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Madonna Jarrett on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Jarrett supports the bill as a practical way to preserve access to cash for essential purchases, particularly for vulnerable and regional Australians and when electronic payment systems fail.
“When electronic payment systems fail, cash continues to work. There's no internet requirement, no mobile signal, no battery and no software update required. Cash provides an important back-up during emergencies. Labor's reforms help ensure Australians can continue purchasing food and fuel even when digital systems experience disruptions. These reforms are particularly important for regional Australia. Many rural communities still experience unreliable telecommunications.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Jarrett supports the bill because it creates a national framework to keep cash distribution viable, ensuring ATMs and retailers receive cash and Australians retain reliable access to notes and coins.
“We want to protect consumers. We want to support vulnerable Australians but also recognise the practical challenges faced by businesses. Our government also recognises that accepting cash means very little if cash cannot actually reach communities. As Australians increasingly use digital payments, transporting cash around the country has become more expensive. Fewer companies now provide these services. Without government action, there was a genuine risk Australia's cash distribution system could become unsustainable. That's why, with this bill, our government is establishing a national framework to protect Australia's cash distribution network. This legislation helps ensure ATMs remain stocked, retailers continue receiving cash deliveries and Australians maintain reliable access to notes and coins into the future.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“Importantly, it gives the ACCC an interim transitional power to help ensure continuity of cash distribution services while the broader framework is implemented.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Daniel Mulino on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Mulino supports the consequential amendments bill because it provides transitional arrangements, including an interim ACCC power to maintain cash distribution servicesMoving, storing, processing or packaging cash. while the broader framework is implemented.
“Today, I am also introducing the Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026. This bill makes consequential amendments and transitional provisions to support the Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026, which seeks to maintain access to cash across Australia and support businesses and financial institutions to continue offering cash services. Importantly, it gives the ACCC an interim transitional power to help ensure continuity of cash distribution services while the broader framework is implemented. The Legislative and Governance Forum for Corporations was notified, as required under the Corporations Agreement 2002. Full details of the measure are contained in the explanatory memorandum.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Mulino supports the bills, saying they will protect the availability of cash by regulating significant distribution entities, resolving access disputes and empowering authorities to maintain critical services during a crisis. He also notes government amendments that prioritise relevant Fair Work obligations where they conflict with the framework.
“I thank the Senate Economics Legislation Committee for its inquiry into the bills and note the additional comments of coalition senators. The committee made two recommendations: to provide clarity on the interaction between the cash distribution framework introduced in the bills and on any road transport contractual chain order; and to ensure consistency in references to the Australian Crime Commission. The government has introduced amendments to the bills to clarify the interaction between the framework and any road transport contractual chain order. This will ensure that relevant Fair Work obligations are appropriately prioritised in the event of incompatibility with relevant elements of the cash distribution framework. Minor technical amendments have also been made for clarity, including to references to the Australian Crime Commission. I commend these bills to the House.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
6 speakers · 4 support · 1 oppose · 1 unclear
“It is important that this bill puts a regulator in charge of our cash distribution system to protect all Australians and to make sure that cash distribution is working for all Australians. This legislation has taken a while to come. It's legislation that we're supporting, but it would have been nice if it could have been quicker. The ACCC approved a merger between Australia's two largest cash-in-transit companies, Armaguard and Prosegur, in June 2023. The Albanese Labor government have now waited until August 2026 to act. This delay has caused significant challenges. The government should not have waited three years to build a proper, permanent framework.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to speak on the Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026. Let me be clear from the outset. The coalition will not oppose this bill, will help pass it and will help pass it quickly. Cash is critical national infrastructure, and it is right to protect it. But I want the House to understand what cash means in a place like my electorate of Grey and why the government's late arrival to this problem matters so much to the people I represent.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We are not going to oppose this bill, but I do commend the member for Page for the amendment that he has brought to this debate because it is important that that we refine the bill such that it is better than in its current form. In June 2023, going back to that year when we had the Senate inquiry going around the countryside, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission approved the merger of Australia's two largest cash-in-transit companies, Armaguard and Prosegur. That decision handed a single company control of up to 90 per cent of the market—a private monopoly over how cash physically moves around Australia. Now, I know the ACCC would have looked into all the whys and wherefores about that particular merger, but, still and all, we know also how mergers and monopolies, moreover, can cause such disadvantage particularly in regional Australia and especially in those country communities.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In conclusion, we support the government. I support the minister and the work he's done on this and on passing the bill quickly, because the undertaking runs out in September. But I had hoped the government would have acted quicker. This will guarantee delivery but not necessarily your right to use cash in as many places as I think it should. And we need a plan for regional bank closures after the moratorium.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I notice, though, that this legislation, the Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026, has a massive oversight in not allowing for medicines to be paid for using cash. And, of course, the matching part of this debate is not just the ability of people to get cash out but how we manage the requirement for business to take it. Despite cash being legal tender, there are many businesses that are now trying not to take cash at all—and I have some sympathy. You have to have an arrangement that's secure, to be able to get cash from your premises to a bank, and that—”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 support
“The fact is cash is king for retailers, sellers and buyers. The Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026 and the Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026 establish a regulatory framework for Australia's cash distribution system, with a particular focus on the cash-in-transit sector. The government's claimed intention is to support continued access to cash as cash use supposedly declines and the economics of distribution become more difficult, especially in regional and remote areas. Key measures include allowing the Reserve Bank of Australia to designate systematically important cash distribution entities, giving the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission oversight of standard terms, pricing, service agreements, access arrangements and service level standards and creating good faith negotiation, arbitration and dispute resolution mechanisms. The bills introduce crisis readiness and resolution powers so that the Reserve Bank of Australia can intervene if a critical provider becomes financially distressed or services are disrupted. In effect, cash handling is moving from a commercial market service with many providers to critical national infrastructure. One Nation supports this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 2 support
“Bank branches, as I said, have been ripped out of our regional communities. In my community, I'm thinking of Lobethal, Hahndorf, Yankalilla, Strathalbyn—the list goes on. Our chequebooks and cheque accounts are being phased out, and we can't afford to lose cash too. We need to protect access to cash so that everyone may have access to cash, so that they have that purchasing power, when it's their preferred or, indeed, perhaps their only option. And that is why I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I support the objective of this bill. I want it to work, but the government and regulators must be clear about who they are measuring. Cash used in south-west Sydney is not marginal, and we've heard from the previous member how important cash is to society. For many people and businesses in my electorate, it remains part of everyday life. Keep cash available, keep it affordable, and count my community in the data.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Consideration in detail: amendments considered
Amendments agreed
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
House · Reported from Federation Chamber
Reported from Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.
Senate Economics Legislation Committee
Report tabled 07 Aug 2026
Referred to Committee (2 July 2026): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (7 Aug 2026)
APH bill page notesSenate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills
Scrutiny Digest 9 of 2026
Considered by scrutiny committee (12 Aug 2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 9 of 2026
APH bill page notes