Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions)

Current status

This bill became law on Aug 26th, 2026.

Policy area

Budget, tax & economy

What does this bill do?

Cash-service customers can receive continued or new services on prices and terms set temporarily by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, the competition watchdog.

Why was it introduced?

The government said falling cash use was making storage, processing and transport harder to fund, while many Australians would face hardship without cash. A Labor speaker cited the Reserve Bank's 2025 Consumer Payments Survey: cash made up about 15 per cent of payments, about half of Australians used it weekly, and about one-third expected hardship or major inconvenience if access became difficult. The bill supplies a 24-month bridge while the wider framework begins; that companion framework includes up to $400 million per crisis to keep critical cash services operating.

Broader context

Australia had already required certain large grocery and fuel retailers to accept cash from 1 January 2026, while cash remained important for roughly one in ten Australians and declining use put pressure on the economics of distributing it. After regulators’ July 2025 consultation found that critical cash services needed safeguards, this bill supplied temporary ACCC powers to keep services and access arrangements in place as the new framework was due to start, and it received Royal Assent on 26 August 2026.

Key criticism

Kevin Hogan (National Party) argued the government acted too late. He said one merged provider controlled 85 to 90 per cent of the market and had sought another $190 million over three years. He also pointed to a $50 million rescue package and said the bill did not address regional bank closures or require pharmacies to accept cash. Malcolm Roberts (One Nation) argued the framework could entrench the dominant provider and said the test for accessing up to $400 million in crisis funding was too low.

Who supported it?

Daniel Mulino MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in House 02 July 2026
Passed House 12 Aug 2026
Passed Senate 20 Aug 2026
Became law 26 Aug 2026

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 26 Aug 2026

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

1 recorded amendment or procedural vote was found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Passage speed

55 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Cash-service customers can receive continued or new services on prices and terms set temporarily by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, the competition watchdog. This power lasts 24 months.

  2. People who rely on cash are protected from serious supply risks during the transition. The competition watchdog can act only when cash availability or critical distribution services may be materially affected.

  3. Cash-distribution providers face penalties for disobeying a temporary direction. The maximum starts at 50,000 penalty units for companies and 5,000 for individuals, or three times the benefit gained.

  4. Cash-transport workers keep protections set through road transport contractual chain orders, which set minimum standards across transport contracting arrangements. The competition watchdog must consider relevant orders when using its temporary powers.

  5. Customers with an existing agreement made before their provider was officially brought under the framework generally keep that agreement. A temporary direction does not override it unless the agreement is later changed.

  6. Cash-service providers and regulators can share protected information when it helps enforce the framework. The Reserve Bank of Australia, the central bank, must use its powers to support cash availability.

Show source excerpts
  1. transition period means the period of 24 months beginning on the day this Schedule commences. (2) An expression used in a provision of this Schedule and in the new Act has the same meaning in that provision as it has in the new Act. 2 Interim power for ACCC to give directions while cash distribution framework is being implemented (1) During the transition period, the ACCC may, by legislative instrument, give a designated entity a direction (an interim direction) requiring the designated entity to provide cash distribution services or facilities access to a customer on terms (including terms
    Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) as-passed text
  2. 3 Procedural matters for giving interim directions (1) The ACCC must not give an interim direction unless the ACCC reasonably believes that giving the direction is appropriate to manage or respond to a risk or potential risk of circumstances arising during the transition period that could have a material effect on: (a) the availability of cash in Australia; or (b) the continued provision of cash distribution services that are critical to the availability of cash in Australia.
    Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) as-passed text
  3. Failure to comply with an interim direction (1) A designated entity is liable to a civil penalty if: (a) an interim direction applies to the designated entity; and (b) the designated entity fails to comply with the interim direction. Note 1: An individual may be liable for an ancillary contravention of this civil penalty provision (see section 92 of the Regulatory Powers Act). Note 2: There is an exception to this civil penalty provision in section 195A (interactions with cash‑related contractual chain orders) of the new Act, as modified by subitem 8(2) of this Schedule. Civil penalty:
    Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) as-passed text
  4. (1A) In giving, varying or revoking an interim direction, the ACCC: (a) must have regard to any relevant cash‑related contractual chain orders; and (b) may consult the Fair Work Commission or the Fair Work Ombudsman in relation to interactions with any such orders.
    Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) as-passed text
  5. (2) An interim direction does not apply to a designated entity, in relation to the designated entity’s provision of a cash distribution service or facilities access to a customer, to the extent that: (a) there is in force a service agreement or access agreement between the designated entity and the customer for the provision of that service or access; and
    Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) as-passed text
  6. 16 After paragraph 10B(1)(d) (da) to ensure the Bank’s functions and powers under the cash distribution framework are performed and exercised in a way that, in the Board’s opinion, best contributes to the availability of cash (as defined by the Cash Distribution Framework Act 2026) in Australia; and
    Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) as-passed text

Broader context for this bill

Australia had already required certain large grocery and fuel retailers to accept cash from 1 January 2026, while cash remained important for roughly one in ten Australians and declining use put pressure on the economics of distributing it. After regulators’ July 2025 consultation found that critical cash services needed safeguards, this bill supplied temporary ACCC powers to keep services and access arrangements in place as the new framework was due to start, and it received Royal Assent on 26 August 2026.

  1. July 2025

    Regulators call for safeguards for critical cash services

    The Council of Financial Regulators and the ACCC concluded their consultation by recommending safeguards to support an accessible, sustainable and resilient cash distribution system.

    Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum ↗
  2. 01 Jan 2026

    Cash acceptance mandate begins

    Certain grocery and fuel retailers began having to accept in-person cash payments of up to $500 between 7am and 9pm, increasing the importance of reliable cash distribution.

    Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum ↗
  3. 27 May 2026

    Major banks propose a joint cash pool

    ANZ, Commonwealth Bank, NAB and Westpac lodged an ACCC authorisation application for a proposed joint venture and cash pool covering cash supply arrangements.

    ACCC ↗
  4. 02 July 2026

    Daniel Mulino MP introduces the bill

    The bill was introduced to provide temporary safeguards for cash distribution while the new regulatory framework was being established.

    Hansard ↗
  5. 20 Aug 2026

    Parliament passes the bill

    Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage of the transitional cash-distribution measures.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  6. 26 Aug 2026

    Royal Assent completes the bill

    The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act that could commence alongside the main cash distribution framework.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 02 July 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 02 July 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Economics review 02 July 2026

Referred to Committee (02/07/2026): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (07/08/2026)

Report tabled 07 Aug 2026

APH bill page notes
Second reading debate 11 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Sent to Federation Chamber for debate 12 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step. For this bill, the Federation Chamber reported back later the same day and the House then completed its remaining formal steps that day.

Referred to Federation Chamber

Federation Chamber debate 12 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate

House second reading agreed 12 Aug 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House agreed to amendments 12 Aug 2026

The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.

Consideration in detail debate

Returned from Federation Chamber without amendment 12 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step. The official House record shows the referral out and return both happened on the same day, before the House moved to its final formal votes.

Reported from Federation Chamber

House third reading agreed 12 Aug 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Scrutiny of Bills review 12 Aug 2026

Considered by scrutiny committee (12/08/2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 9 of 2026

Scrutiny Digest 9 of 2026

APH bill page notes
Introduced 17 Aug 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 17 Aug 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 17 Aug 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate second reading agreed 20 Aug 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Senate third reading agreed 20 Aug 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Passed both houses 20 Aug 2026

Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.

Finally passed both Houses

Assent 26 Aug 2026

The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.

The main case against this bill

Kevin Hogan (National Party) argued the government acted too late. He said one merged provider controlled 85 to 90 per cent of the market and had sought another $190 million over three years. He also pointed to a $50 million rescue package and said the bill did not address regional bank closures or require pharmacies to accept cash. Malcolm Roberts (One Nation) argued the framework could entrench the dominant provider and said the test for accessing up to $400 million in crisis funding was too low.

Both speakers supported the bills overall. The government said regulation was needed because falling cash use was weakening the distribution business, while cash remained important during emergencies and outages.

Monopoly and cost risks

The market rules and crisis-funding arrangements could reinforce a dominant provider and leave businesses or the public facing excessive costs.

Raised by Malcolm Roberts, One Nation Source ↗

Framework leaves access gaps

The measures do not directly stop bank branch closures or comprehensively protect cash use, and concerns were also raised about support for post offices and access to medicines.

Raised by Matthew Canavan, Malcolm Roberts and Susan McDonald Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

12 Aug 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

20 Aug 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Amendments at a glance

Amendments grouped by chamber. Where APH reports aggregate counts, the package card summarizes the matching public amendment sheets by source theme.

House

Carried

Government package: 7 amendments

Government amendments require the ACCC to consider relevant cash-related contractual chain orders when issuing, varying or revoking interim directions, permit consultation with workplace regulators, and make related drafting clarifications.

12 Aug 2026

Passed on the voices

The chamber agreed to this amendment package without a counted vote. APH records the agreed count by amendment, while the source documents are grouped into amendment sheets.

Themes in the public amendment sheets

Senate

Carried

Changes to the cash distribution framework

Aye 34 No 26

Passed 34 to 26. Support came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and minor parties and independents.

20 Aug 2026

The change added employment protections to the cash-distribution framework, limiting how the Reserve Bank could restructure a designated entityA provider formally covered by the framework. during a crisis.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 24 / 0
Liberal 0 / 19
Greens 9 / 0
One Nation 0 / 3
Nationals 0 / 3
Independent 1 / 0
Unknown 0 / 1
Carried

Call for faster action on cash access and bank closures

The Senate added the opposition's statement criticising delays and the lack of a plan for regional bank closures. It did not reject the bills.

Carried on voices

The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.

Carried

Changes to the cash distribution framework

The Senate agreed to an amendment on voices. The division record does not identify its narrower subject.

Carried on voices

The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.

These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Daniel Mulino

Australian Labor Party • MP 02 July 2026

Mulino supports the consequential amendments bill because it provides transitional arrangements, including an interim ACCC power to maintain cash distribution servicesMoving, storing, processing or packaging cash. while the broader framework is implemented.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead opposing voice Opposes

Susan McDonald

National Party • Senator 17 Aug 2026

Susan McDonald supports protecting access to and use of cash, especially during outages and natural disasters, but does not clearly state whether she supports the consequential amendments bill and criticises the broader framework for failing to cover medicines.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Malcolm Roberts

Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party • Senator 17 Aug 2026

Roberts says One Nation supports the bill because its framework can protect and restore cash distribution, particularly in regional areas, but he criticises gaps in support for post offices and warns that its crisis funding and market rules could entrench a monopoly or impose excessive costs.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

Rebekha Sharkie

Centre Alliance • MP 11 Aug 2026

Rebekha Sharkie supports the bill because it protects reliable access to cash, particularly for regional communities, older Australians, small businesses and people affected by digital exclusion or emergencies.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

15 speakers · 17 contributions · 15 support

  1. Matt Burnell Burnell supports the bill because its temporary ACCC directions powers will manage the transition to the new cash distribution framework and protect reliable access to cash while longer-term arrangements are established.
    “The accompanying Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill ensures that the transition to the new framework is equally well managed. Schedule 2 provides the ACCC with temporary directions powers, should a significant risk to cash access arise during implementation. Those powers are deliberately limited. They expire after 24 months and exist solely to bridge the gap, while longer-term commercial arrangements are established under the new framework. This legislation also complements the government's broader reforms protecting cash access. The cash acceptance mandate, which commenced on 1 January 2026, requires eligible supermarkets and fuel retailers to accept cash for transactions up to $500 during standard trading hours. Protecting the right to pay with cash is only meaningful if businesses themselves can obtain notes and coins. Alongside commitments from the major banks to pause further regional bank closures, together with strengthened investments in Bank@Post, these reforms form part of a broader strategy to ensure Australians retain access to essential banking services regardless of where they live.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Tom French French supports the bill because it protects reliable access to cash while ensuring the new distribution framework respects road transport standards, worker safety and the Fair Work Commission's authority.
    “These bills are about keeping the system available. They recognise the way Australians' pay is changing. They do not try and stop the change, but they also recognise that progress does not require us to abandon people who still rely on cash. They support fair and transparent pricing. They provide minimum service standards. They give businesses a pathway to resolve disputes. They provide the Reserve Bank with tools to respond if a critical provider is in serious trouble. These amendments make an important clarification: the new framework must work alongside Australia's industrial relations system, not cut across it—and the road transport contractual chain orders exist for that reason. I commend the bills to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Sarah Witty Sarah Witty supports the bill, arguing it will protect access to cash by making the distribution system fairer, more reliable and better prepared for crises, particularly for regional communities, small businesses and people who depend on cash.
    “This bill protects choice. It keeps an essential service working in the public interest. From the tooth fairy to marketplace, from small businesses to school fundraisers, cash remains part of the moments that shape families and bring communities together. Behind those moments sit a national system. Labor is making that system fairer. Labor is making it stronger. Labor is making sure progress carries people with it. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 12 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Steve Georganas Georganas supports the bill because its transitional safeguards and temporary ACCC intervention powers will protect continued access to cash while the new regulatory framework is introduced, particularly for people and businesses that depend on cash.
    “That's why the transitional arrangements contained in the Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026 are equally important. These provisions will ensure that, during the introduction of the new framework, safeguards remain firmly in place. As I said earlier, it gives the ACCC temporary powers to intervene where there is a significant risk to ongoing cash access, creating an important bridge between the current system and long-term arrangements established by the legislation. At its core, the bill recognises a simple reality, and that reality is that, while Australia's payment system may continue to evolve—and it will evolve—the government has a responsibility to ensure that those who rely on cash are not left behind, whether it's the pensioner paying for their groceries, the small business managing daily transactions or the family living in a regional community where digital alternatives are not always there or not always reliable. Australians deserve confidence that cash will remain available when they need it, and that is exactly what this legislation seeks to secure.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Susan Templeman Templeman supports the bill, saying its consequential amendments will make cash distribution more reliable, transparent and sustainable while resolving potential conflicts with road transport workplace rules.
    “The bill itself is intended to support the ongoing sustainability of the cash distribution system, but there are additional amendments because the bill itself is not intended to supersede industrial relations laws, including the road transport contractual chain orders, which set minimum standards for people in road transport contractual chains to ensure operators are safe, sustainable and viable. In most instances, the cash distribution framework contained in the contractual chain orders will not overlap, given these regimes target different policy outcomes. However, in the event that the two regimes do have some overlap or conflict, the proposed amendments provide a pathway for resolving that conflict. These changes ensure that requirements of the Fair Work Commission set out in a road transport contractual chain order are appropriately protected and address concerns about potential regulatory ambiguity. The amendments require the ACCC to consider a relevant contractual chain order when setting, varying or revoking approved standard terms and service-level standards or when exercising interim powers. The amendments will support those outcomes. The amendments also require the ACCC to have various roles in it.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 12 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Julie-Ann Campbell Campbell supports the bill because it helps protect Australians' access to cash and their freedom to choose how they pay, particularly as payment systems become increasingly digital.
    “The Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026 and the Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026 are designed for this purpose to ensure that Australians have access to cash for as long as they want to use it, because, while we have to embrace new technology with gusto, we cannot leave Australians who still want to use cash behind. The Albanese Labor government is committed to protecting Australians' access to cash and by extension protecting people's rights to choose how they pay for goods and services. While the modernisation of payment systems has been rapid and has certainly aided in productivity and ease of payment for many, it is important to us that no-one is left behind.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Richard Dowling Dowling supports the bill and its amendments because they keep cash distribution operating as essential backup infrastructure, preserve worker protections and give regulators powers to protect reliable service and fair pricing.
    “This is a measured answer to a real problem. It's not a step back from the digital future. It is a way of making sure that the future leaves no-one stranded at the check-out. It sits alongside the cash our shops must now accept, and it backs the supply of cash that Tasmanians and Australians rely on every day. Therefore, I support this bill and the amendments.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 17 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. David Moncrieff Moncrieff supports the bill as a practical framework to protect the long-term availability of cash by regulating critical distribution providers, improving oversight and managing threats to essential cash services.
    “It forms part of our broader agenda to safeguard the use of cash well into the future along with reforms to Australia's payments system, the cash mandate introduced earlier this year and ongoing work to ensure sustainable access to regional bank branches. It's a bill in the best Labor traditions of inclusion, choice and fairness. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 12 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  9. Claire Clutterham Claire Clutterham supports the bill as part of the framework to preserve access to cash and strengthen the long-term resilience of cash distribution, particularly for vulnerable people, small businesses and communities facing emergencies or service outages.
    “As payment methods change and the digital age becomes even more entrenched, the Albanese Labor government is acting to ensure the marketplace is available and accessible to everyone, not just to those who can easily adapt to the digital marketplace. This bill protects not only vulnerable Australians but all Australians and Australian businesses by ensuring the availability of cash and shoring up the cash distribution and payment system so it enjoys long-term resilience and sustainability. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Zhi Soon Soon supports the bill as the next step in protecting access to cash, arguing that fair and transparent regulation and crisis powers will make cash distribution more resilient and sustainable, particularly for regional communities.
    “The government is committed to safeguarding Australians by ensuring continued access to cash and recognising its essential role in our society in law. That is why the government introduced the cash acceptance mandate, which came into effect on 1 January this year. It is enforced by the ACCC and requires major grocery and motor fuel retailers to accept cash for everyday transactions of $500 or less during regular business hours. This is a commonsense measure that protects small businesses by exempting those with a turnover of less than $10 million, unless they share a trademark with a larger retailer. While the cash acceptance mandate is working as intended, we need to ensure that no-one is left behind in the payment system. With the introduction of the Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026, the government is taking the next step and delivering on its commitment to maintaining cash for as long as Australians want to use it.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 12 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  11. Zaneta Mascarenhas Mascarenhas supports the bill because it helps preserve reliable access to cash for communities and people who may be excluded by the shift to digital payments.
    “Access is not something you legislate once and move on from. It is something that you keep on building into every part of government. This includes something as ordinary as how people actually pay for their groceries. Cash is an important part of the Australian economy. We will make sure that all communities continue to have access to this. Because of these amazing changes, I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  12. Rob Mitchell Mitchell supports the bill because it will protect reliable access to cash, particularly for older, regional and low-income Australians, while giving regulators powers to keep critical distribution services viable and respond to crises.
    “Australians across all demographic groups continue to use cash as a way to make their everyday payments. But now cash distribution is under threat. Declining transactional cash use is placing pressure on the economics of storing, processing and transporting cash around the country. Industry consolidation, as the member for Riverina mentioned, and structural changes mean that it's time that regulations change as well. Our government is committed to giving a fair go to all Australians. Maintaining reasonable access to cash to withdraw and to deposit services for Australians who want or need to use cash is part of keeping that commitment. It's why we're acting to ensure Australians have access to cash. No matter what part of the country you live in, you should be able to go and get your groceries, your meat and veg, and just hand over a couple of pineapples. This is why I'm proud to support these bills.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 12 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  13. Madonna Jarrett 2 contributions Jarrett supports the bill because it creates a national framework to keep cash distribution viable, ensuring ATMs and retailers receive cash and Australians retain reliable access to notes and coins.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Madonna Jarrett on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Aug 2026

    Jarrett supports the bill as a practical way to preserve access to cash for essential purchases, particularly for vulnerable and regional Australians and when electronic payment systems fail.

    “When electronic payment systems fail, cash continues to work. There's no internet requirement, no mobile signal, no battery and no software update required. Cash provides an important back-up during emergencies. Labor's reforms help ensure Australians can continue purchasing food and fuel even when digital systems experience disruptions. These reforms are particularly important for regional Australia. Many rural communities still experience unreliable telecommunications.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 12 Aug 2026

    Jarrett supports the bill because it creates a national framework to keep cash distribution viable, ensuring ATMs and retailers receive cash and Australians retain reliable access to notes and coins.

    “We want to protect consumers. We want to support vulnerable Australians but also recognise the practical challenges faced by businesses. Our government also recognises that accepting cash means very little if cash cannot actually reach communities. As Australians increasingly use digital payments, transporting cash around the country has become more expensive. Fewer companies now provide these services. Without government action, there was a genuine risk Australia's cash distribution system could become unsustainable. That's why, with this bill, our government is establishing a national framework to protect Australia's cash distribution network. This legislation helps ensure ATMs remain stocked, retailers continue receiving cash deliveries and Australians maintain reliable access to notes and coins into the future.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  14. Tim Ayres Ayres supports the bill because it provides consequential and transitional measures for the cash distribution framework, including an interim ACCC power to help maintain cash services while the broader framework is implemented.
    “Importantly, it gives the ACCC an interim transitional power to help ensure continuity of cash distribution services while the broader framework is implemented.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 17 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

6 speakers · 4 support · 1 oppose · 1 unclear

  1. Aaron Violi Violi says the coalition supports the cash distribution reforms because they will protect reliable cash deliveries, especially to regional communities, but criticises the government for acting too slowly and says broader access to cash remains unresolved.
    “It is important that this bill puts a regulator in charge of our cash distribution system to protect all Australians and to make sure that cash distribution is working for all Australians. This legislation has taken a while to come. It's legislation that we're supporting, but it would have been nice if it could have been quicker. The ACCC approved a merger between Australia's two largest cash-in-transit companies, Armaguard and Prosegur, in June 2023. The Albanese Labor government have now waited until August 2026 to act. This delay has caused significant challenges. The government should not have waited three years to build a proper, permanent framework.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 12 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Tom Venning Venning does not address the consequential amendments and transitional provisions bill; his remarks support the separate cash distribution framework bill, so his position on the target bill is unclear.
    “I rise to speak on the Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026. Let me be clear from the outset. The coalition will not oppose this bill, will help pass it and will help pass it quickly. Cash is critical national infrastructure, and it is right to protect it. But I want the House to understand what cash means in a place like my electorate of Grey and why the government's late arrival to this problem matters so much to the people I represent.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 12 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Matthew Canavan Canavan says the coalition supports the bill because regulating the near-monopoly cash distribution market and establishing an emergency regime are necessary, but criticises the government for acting late and says the bill does not address bank closures or adequately protect cash use.
    “While this is a positive step—and a belated step, as I've mentioned—that we're happy to support, I would take this opportunity just to point out that this does not solve all of the issues for the use and distribution of cash in our economy. We've got the trucks; hopefully, we'll continue to have the trucks there, and the armoured guards. But they need a place to deliver it, and too many places in regional Australia are now without banks.”

    Liberal National Party • Senator • 17 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Michael McCormack McCormack says the opposition will allow the bill to pass because cash distribution is critical national infrastructure, particularly for regional communities, but urges the House to adopt the member for Page's amendment to improve it and address risks from the cash-in-transit monopoly.
    “We are not going to oppose this bill, but I do commend the member for Page for the amendment that he has brought to this debate because it is important that that we refine the bill such that it is better than in its current form. In June 2023, going back to that year when we had the Senate inquiry going around the countryside, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission approved the merger of Australia's two largest cash-in-transit companies, Armaguard and Prosegur. That decision handed a single company control of up to 90 per cent of the market—a private monopoly over how cash physically moves around Australia. Now, I know the ACCC would have looked into all the whys and wherefores about that particular merger, but, still and all, we know also how mergers and monopolies, moreover, can cause such disadvantage particularly in regional Australia and especially in those country communities.”

    National Party • MP • 12 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Kevin Hogan Hogan supports passing the bill quickly because its regulatory powers will protect cash distribution, but criticises the government for acting too late and says broader action is needed to ensure people can use cash and retain access to regional banking.
    “In conclusion, we support the government. I support the minister and the work he's done on this and on passing the bill quickly, because the undertaking runs out in September. But I had hoped the government would have acted quicker. This will guarantee delivery but not necessarily your right to use cash in as many places as I think it should. And we need a plan for regional bank closures after the moratorium.”

    National Party • MP • 11 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

One Nation

1 speaker · 1 support

Minor parties and independents

2 speakers · 2 support

  1. Dai Le Dai Le supports the cash distribution framework, saying it is needed to preserve reliable cash access while urging transparent oversight, affordable compliance and proper recognition of cash-reliant multicultural communities.
    “I support the objective of this bill. I want it to work, but the government and regulators must be clear about who they are measuring. Cash used in south-west Sydney is not marginal, and we've heard from the previous member how important cash is to society. For many people and businesses in my electorate, it remains part of everyday life. Keep cash available, keep it affordable, and count my community in the data.”

    Independent • MP • 11 Aug 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat