Risk of unintended legal changes
Zoe McKenzie said a Senate committee should check that the technical amendments do not make substantive changes to the law.
This bill is currently before Parliament.
Law, justice & rights
People correcting personal information held by government can send applications electronically, by post or in person.
Attorney-General Michelle Rowland (Labor) said the bill would make Commonwealth laws easier to understand by fixing errors, updating references and removing obsolete material. It amends 42 Acts and repeals 106 spent or obsolete Acts. She said this type of legal maintenance has been used since 1934 to keep the law accurate and up to date. The government says the changes have no financial impact and make no major policy change.
Commonwealth statute law has been periodically revised since 1934, but accumulated drafting errors, outdated cross-references and spent provisions still made parts of the statute book harder to read and administer. The Statute Update Bill 2026, introduced by Michelle Rowland MP, responds by correcting and modernising 42 Acts and repealing 106 obsolete Acts while preserving past rights and liabilities, with the House passing it on 2 July 2026 so the technical clean-up can proceed.
Zoe McKenzie (Liberal) argued Parliament should verify that every change described as technical truly leaves people’s rights and obligations untouched. She sought review by the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee, a parliamentary committee that examines proposed laws. She particularly wanted assurances about veterans’ payments, moved legal powers and repealed temporary rules.
Michelle Rowland MP introduced this bill. Supportive speeches so far have come from Labor, Nationals.
Did it become law?
Not yet
Final passage
No final vote yet
The bill has not yet completed passage through Parliament.
Days since introduction
43 days
Updated 07 Aug 2026.
Meaning
People correcting personal information held by government can send applications electronically, by post or in person.
Families in child-related court cases get a corrected reference showing which rule lets a court consider second-hand evidence.
People using federal court laws get updated references to the renamed Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
National Disability Insurance Scheme participants get a corrected legal reference for emergency funding after their support needs change significantly.
Veterans keep their current payments and future adjustments while outdated rules for earlier payment increases are removed.
People using Commonwealth laws get corrected spelling, punctuation, names and links between provisions across 42 Acts.
People relying on older legal arrangements keep any protections that still matter when 106 spent or redundant Acts are repealed.
Sections 49 and 51A of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 impose certain requirements in relation to applications for amendment or annotation of a record of personal information kept by an agency or Minister. Paragraphs 49(d) and 51A(e) require applications to be sent by post to the agency or Minister, or delivered to an officer of the agency or member of the staff of the Minister, at the address of the office of the agency or Minister determined in accordance with paragraph 15(2)(d) of the Act. Paragraph 15(2)(d) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 was repealed by the Freedom of InformatiStatute Update explanatory memorandum
Item 6 corrects the reference in subsection 102NM(1) of the Family Law Act 1975 to subsection 102NL(2) and rephrases the subsection to make it clear that the court’s decision to apply the law against hearsay to child-related proceedings is made under subsection 102NL(3).Statute Update explanatory memorandum
Paragraphs 24(1D)(ca) and (d) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 provide that a judgment of the Federal Circuit Court under section 17A of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 and an order made by the Federal Circuit Court under section 88F, 88U or 88V of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 are taken to be interlocutory judgments for the purposes of certain subsections of section 24 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 dealing with the appellate jurisdiction of the Federal Court. The Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 was repealed on 1 September 2Statute Update explanatory memorandum
Paragraph 45(5)(d) of the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 refers to “a variation of [the] participant’s plan covered by subparagraph 47A(1)(d)(i) or (1AB)(j)(i) (crisis or emergency funding as a result of a significant change to the participant’s support needs)”. There is no subparagraph 47A(1)(d)(i) in the Act. Subparagraph 47A(1A)(d)(i) of the Act provides for a variation of the statement of principles included in an old framework plan because a participant requires crisis or emergency funding as a result of a significant change to the participant’s support needs. Item 65 corrStatute Update explanatory memorandum
The amendments repeal spent provisions that dealt with historical increases, transitional indexation adjustments and other historical arrangements in the veterans’ affairs portfolio. The provisions have performed their historical function by giving effect to past increases in rates and amounts, applying transitional adjustments to indexation factors, and dealing with the consequences of those adjustments for historical payment, rate-calculation and income-tax purposes. Those historical increases and transitional adjustments have worked through the relevant legislative mechanisms, and the proviStatute Update explanatory memorandum
The Statute Update Bill 2026 amends 42 Commonwealth acts to make minor, technical amendments across the Commonwealth statute book, including to fix errors, remove spent and obsolete provisions, and update references to align with modern legislative drafting practice. The bill also repeals 106 spent or obsolete acts. Such amendments would improve the quality of legislation and ensure it can be more easily understood. Statute law revision acts and statute stocktake acts have been passed since 1934 to remove obsolete and spent provisions from the statute book and correct drafting mistakes. TheySecond reading speech
Item 2—Continuing operation of certain provisions Item 2 of Schedule 2 makes clear that the repeal of an Act by item 1 of Schedule 2 does not affect the continuing operation of any provision of the repealed Act that is made, or expressed to be made, for an application, saving or transitional purpose. It also preserves provisions that are consequential to, or related to, those application, saving or transitional provisions. Item 1 of Schedule 2 repeals a number of spent or redundant Acts. Some of those Acts contain application, saving or transitional provisions, or provisions that are relatedStatute Update explanatory memorandum
Context
Commonwealth statute law has been periodically revised since 1934, but accumulated drafting errors, outdated cross-references and spent provisions still made parts of the statute book harder to read and administer. The Statute Update Bill 2026, introduced by Michelle Rowland MP, responds by correcting and modernising 42 Acts and repealing 106 obsolete Acts while preserving past rights and liabilities, with the House passing it on 2 July 2026 so the technical clean-up can proceed.
Statute law revision establishes a longstanding clean-up practice
Statute law revision and stocktake bills have been used since 1934 to correct drafting mistakes and remove spent provisions, establishing the maintenance practice this bill continues.
Hansard ↗Michelle Rowland MP introduces a technical statute clean-up
The bill responds to errors, outdated references and obsolete provisions by amending 42 Commonwealth Acts and repealing 106 spent or obsolete Acts while preserving past rights and liabilities.
Parliamentary timeline ↗House passes the bill
The House completed its consideration of the bill, allowing the proposed technical corrections, repeals and modernised references to move to the next stage of the legislative process.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Second reading debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Reported from Federation Chamber
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Referred to Committee (02/07/2026): Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee; Report due 07/08/2026
Report due 07 Aug 2026
APH bill page notesKey criticism
Zoe McKenzie (Liberal) argued Parliament should verify that every change described as technical truly leaves people’s rights and obligations untouched. She sought review by the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee, a parliamentary committee that examines proposed laws. She particularly wanted assurances about veterans’ payments, moved legal powers and repealed temporary rules.
McKenzie said the Coalition supported keeping Commonwealth laws accurate and did not oppose the bill. Michael McCormack (National) also supported it, while expressing caution about whether the veterans’ changes would leave payments and benefits unaffected.
Risk of unintended legal changes
Zoe McKenzie said a Senate committee should check that the technical amendments do not make substantive changes to the law.
Further sources
Votes
No recorded votes have been found yet for this bill.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Michelle Rowland supports the bill, saying its minor technical amendments and repeal of obsolete laws will keep the Commonwealth statute book accurate, clear and up to date.
Read in Hansard ↗Michael McCormack supports the bill because it makes technical, non-contentious updates without changing substantive rights, obligations or penalties.
Read in Hansard ↗Tom French supports the bill, saying it is necessary legislative maintenance that corrects errors, updates references and removes obsolete laws to make the statute book clearer and easier to administer.
Read in Hansard ↗Zoe McKenzie supports the bill's goal of keeping Commonwealth laws accurate, but says it should be examined by a Senate committee before proceeding to confirm that its technical amendments do not make substantive legal changes.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
3 speakers · 3 support
“The Statute Update Bill 2026 does exactly that. It corrects errors. It updates references and removes those spent provisions. It repeals obsolete acts. It improves readability and administration across the Commonwealth Statute Book, and, in a parliament which often deals with large and contested reforms, this bill is a reminder that practical work also counts. Sometimes governing is not about announcing a new scheme. Sometimes it's about fixing a section number, updating a court name, deleting the dead provision and putting the full stop where the full stop was always meant to be. That may not be dramatic, but it is necessary. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Statute Update Bill 2026 amends 42 Commonwealth Acts to make minor, technical amendments across the Commonwealth statute book, including to fix errors, remove spent and obsolete provisions, and update references to align with modern legislative drafting practice. The Bill also repeals 106 spent or obsolete Acts. Such amendments would improve the quality of legislation and ensure it can be more easily understood.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Statute Update Bill 2026 amends 42 Commonwealth acts to make minor, technical amendments across the Commonwealth statute book, including to fix errors, remove spent and obsolete provisions, and update references to align with modern legislative drafting practice. The bill also repeals 106 spent or obsolete acts. Such amendments would improve the quality of legislation and ensure it can be more easily understood.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 1 support · 1 mixed
“Previous bills were introduced as statute law revision bills and statute stocktake bills. The member for Moore mentioned in his speech that there's been 92 years of this particular bill—probably under different guises and different names, but the statute bill we're referring to today is the 2026 version. The most recent act is the Statute Update Act 2016, so it's been a decade. There have been many, many bills passed and a lot of legislation concurred with in that decade. By convention, these bills are prepared by the Office of Parliamentary Counsel and confined to technical machinery and non-contentious amendments. Given that, we'll take the government on its word. We hope that their word is their bond when it comes to the Statute Update Bill 2026, and I commend it to the Chamber.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Accordingly, while the coalition supports the objectives of maintaining an accurate and coherent statute book, we believe this bill should first be examined by the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee before proceeding through the Senate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Reported from Federation Chamber
Reported from Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee
Report due 07 Aug 2026
Referred to Committee (2 July 2026): Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee; Report due 7 Aug 2026
APH bill page notes