Statute Update

Current status

This bill is currently before Parliament.

Policy area

Law, justice & rights

What does this bill do?

People correcting personal information held by government can send applications electronically, by post or in person.

Why was it introduced?

Attorney-General Michelle Rowland (Labor) said the bill would make Commonwealth laws easier to understand by fixing errors, updating references and removing obsolete material. It amends 42 Acts and repeals 106 spent or obsolete Acts. She said this type of legal maintenance has been used since 1934 to keep the law accurate and up to date. The government says the changes have no financial impact and make no major policy change.

Broader context

Commonwealth statute law has been periodically revised since 1934, but accumulated drafting errors, outdated cross-references and spent provisions still made parts of the statute book harder to read and administer. The Statute Update Bill 2026, introduced by Michelle Rowland MP, responds by correcting and modernising 42 Acts and repealing 106 obsolete Acts while preserving past rights and liabilities, with the House passing it on 2 July 2026 so the technical clean-up can proceed.

Key criticism

Zoe McKenzie (Liberal) argued Parliament should verify that every change described as technical truly leaves people’s rights and obligations untouched. She sought review by the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee, a parliamentary committee that examines proposed laws. She particularly wanted assurances about veterans’ payments, moved legal powers and repealed temporary rules.

Who supported it?

Michelle Rowland MP introduced this bill. Supportive speeches so far have come from Labor, Nationals.

Introduced in House 25 June 2026
Passed House 02 July 2026
At second reading in Senate 02 July 2026
Not yet law

Did it become law?

Not yet

Final passage

No final vote yet

The bill has not yet completed passage through Parliament.

Days since introduction

43 days

Updated 07 Aug 2026.

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. People correcting personal information held by government can send applications electronically, by post or in person.

  2. Families in child-related court cases get a corrected reference showing which rule lets a court consider second-hand evidence.

  3. People using federal court laws get updated references to the renamed Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.

  4. National Disability Insurance Scheme participants get a corrected legal reference for emergency funding after their support needs change significantly.

  5. Veterans keep their current payments and future adjustments while outdated rules for earlier payment increases are removed.

  6. People using Commonwealth laws get corrected spelling, punctuation, names and links between provisions across 42 Acts.

  7. People relying on older legal arrangements keep any protections that still matter when 106 spent or redundant Acts are repealed.

Show source excerpts
  1. Sections 49 and 51A of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 impose certain requirements in relation to applications for amendment or annotation of a record of personal information kept by an agency or Minister. Paragraphs 49(d) and 51A(e) require applications to be sent by post to the agency or Minister, or delivered to an officer of the agency or member of the staff of the Minister, at the address of the office of the agency or Minister determined in accordance with paragraph 15(2)(d) of the Act. Paragraph 15(2)(d) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 was repealed by the Freedom of Informati
    Statute Update explanatory memorandum
  2. Item 6 corrects the reference in subsection 102NM(1) of the Family Law Act 1975 to subsection 102NL(2) and rephrases the subsection to make it clear that the court’s decision to apply the law against hearsay to child-related proceedings is made under subsection 102NL(3).
    Statute Update explanatory memorandum
  3. Paragraphs 24(1D)(ca) and (d) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 provide that a judgment of the Federal Circuit Court under section 17A of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 and an order made by the Federal Circuit Court under section 88F, 88U or 88V of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 are taken to be interlocutory judgments for the purposes of certain subsections of section 24 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 dealing with the appellate jurisdiction of the Federal Court. The Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 was repealed on 1 September 2
    Statute Update explanatory memorandum
  4. Paragraph 45(5)(d) of the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 refers to “a variation of [the] participant’s plan covered by subparagraph 47A(1)(d)(i) or (1AB)(j)(i) (crisis or emergency funding as a result of a significant change to the participant’s support needs)”. There is no subparagraph 47A(1)(d)(i) in the Act. Subparagraph 47A(1A)(d)(i) of the Act provides for a variation of the statement of principles included in an old framework plan because a participant requires crisis or emergency funding as a result of a significant change to the participant’s support needs. Item 65 corr
    Statute Update explanatory memorandum
  5. The amendments repeal spent provisions that dealt with historical increases, transitional indexation adjustments and other historical arrangements in the veterans’ affairs portfolio. The provisions have performed their historical function by giving effect to past increases in rates and amounts, applying transitional adjustments to indexation factors, and dealing with the consequences of those adjustments for historical payment, rate-calculation and income-tax purposes. Those historical increases and transitional adjustments have worked through the relevant legislative mechanisms, and the provi
    Statute Update explanatory memorandum
  6. The Statute Update Bill 2026 amends 42 Commonwealth acts to make minor, technical amendments across the Commonwealth statute book, including to fix errors, remove spent and obsolete provisions, and update references to align with modern legislative drafting practice. The bill also repeals 106 spent or obsolete acts. Such amendments would improve the quality of legislation and ensure it can be more easily understood. Statute law revision acts and statute stocktake acts have been passed since 1934 to remove obsolete and spent provisions from the statute book and correct drafting mistakes. They
    Second reading speech
  7. Item 2—Continuing operation of certain provisions Item 2 of Schedule 2 makes clear that the repeal of an Act by item 1 of Schedule 2 does not affect the continuing operation of any provision of the repealed Act that is made, or expressed to be made, for an application, saving or transitional purpose. It also preserves provisions that are consequential to, or related to, those application, saving or transitional provisions. Item 1 of Schedule 2 repeals a number of spent or redundant Acts. Some of those Acts contain application, saving or transitional provisions, or provisions that are related
    Statute Update explanatory memorandum

Broader context for this bill

Commonwealth statute law has been periodically revised since 1934, but accumulated drafting errors, outdated cross-references and spent provisions still made parts of the statute book harder to read and administer. The Statute Update Bill 2026, introduced by Michelle Rowland MP, responds by correcting and modernising 42 Acts and repealing 106 obsolete Acts while preserving past rights and liabilities, with the House passing it on 2 July 2026 so the technical clean-up can proceed.

  1. Since 1934

    Statute law revision establishes a longstanding clean-up practice

    Statute law revision and stocktake bills have been used since 1934 to correct drafting mistakes and remove spent provisions, establishing the maintenance practice this bill continues.

    Hansard ↗
  2. 25 June 2026

    Michelle Rowland MP introduces a technical statute clean-up

    The bill responds to errors, outdated references and obsolete provisions by amending 42 Commonwealth Acts and repealing 106 spent or obsolete Acts while preserving past rights and liabilities.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  3. 02 July 2026

    House passes the bill

    The House completed its consideration of the bill, allowing the proposed technical corrections, repeals and modernised references to move to the next stage of the legislative process.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 25 June 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 25 June 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 01 July 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Sent to Federation Chamber for debate 01 July 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Referred to Federation Chamber

Federation Chamber debate 01 July 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate

House second reading agreed 01 July 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Returned from Federation Chamber 02 July 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Reported from Federation Chamber

House third reading agreed 02 July 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 02 July 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 02 July 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Legal and Constitutional Affairs review 02 July 2026

Referred to Committee (02/07/2026): Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee; Report due 07/08/2026

Report due 07 Aug 2026

APH bill page notes

The main case against this bill

Zoe McKenzie (Liberal) argued Parliament should verify that every change described as technical truly leaves people’s rights and obligations untouched. She sought review by the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee, a parliamentary committee that examines proposed laws. She particularly wanted assurances about veterans’ payments, moved legal powers and repealed temporary rules.

McKenzie said the Coalition supported keeping Commonwealth laws accurate and did not oppose the bill. Michael McCormack (National) also supported it, while expressing caution about whether the veterans’ changes would leave payments and benefits unaffected.

Risk of unintended legal changes

Zoe McKenzie said a Senate committee should check that the technical amendments do not make substantive changes to the law.

Raised by Zoe McKenzie Source ↗

Recorded votes

No recorded votes have been found yet for this bill.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Michelle Rowland

Australian Labor Party • MP 25 June 2026

Michelle Rowland supports the bill, saying its minor technical amendments and repeal of obsolete laws will keep the Commonwealth statute book accurate, clear and up to date.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Michael McCormack

National Party • MP 01 July 2026

Michael McCormack supports the bill because it makes technical, non-contentious updates without changing substantive rights, obligations or penalties.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Tom French

Australian Labor Party • MP 01 July 2026

Tom French supports the bill, saying it is necessary legislative maintenance that corrects errors, updates references and removes obsolete laws to make the statute book clearer and easier to administer.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Mixed

Zoe McKenzie

Liberal Party • MP 01 July 2026

Zoe McKenzie supports the bill's goal of keeping Commonwealth laws accurate, but says it should be examined by a Senate committee before proceeding to confirm that its technical amendments do not make substantive legal changes.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

3 speakers · 3 support

  1. Tim Ayres Tim Ayres supports the bill, saying its minor technical amendments will improve the clarity, accuracy and accessibility of Commonwealth legislation while removing obsolete Acts.
    “The Statute Update Bill 2026 amends 42 Commonwealth Acts to make minor, technical amendments across the Commonwealth statute book, including to fix errors, remove spent and obsolete provisions, and update references to align with modern legislative drafting practice. The Bill also repeals 106 spent or obsolete Acts. Such amendments would improve the quality of legislation and ensure it can be more easily understood.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 02 July 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

2 speakers · 1 support · 1 mixed

Full record

Full chat