Defence Legislation Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 2)

Current status

This bill is currently before Parliament.

Policy area

Defence & foreign affairs

What does this bill do?

Defence law will make lifetime wellbeing, health and safety a formal priority for current and former ADFAustralia's military organisation, comprising the Navy, Army and Air Force. members and their families, including during transition from serviceThe period when an Australian Defence Force member leaves military service and moves into civilian life, which the bill treats as a time requiring stronger support..

Why was it introduced?

The Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran SuicideThe national inquiry whose 2024 final report recommended reforms to reduce suicide and improve support for serving and former Defence personnel and their families. exposed gaps in lifelong wellbeing support, health-information use, family assistance and ADFAustralia's military organisation, comprising the Navy, Army and Air Force. eligibility and service rules. This bill responds by embedding wellbeing duties, enabling protected information use, strengthening health and family support, and tightening rules for recruitment and ending service.

Broader context

Before this bill, Defence and the Department of Veterans’ Affairs already supported serving and former ADFAustralia's military organisation, comprising the Navy, Army and Air Force. members, while earlier Royal Commission reforms had begun adding oversight and changing veterans’ entitlements. The Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran SuicideThe national inquiry whose 2024 final report recommended reforms to reduce suicide and improve support for serving and former Defence personnel and their families.’s final report on 9 September 2024 exposed gaps against a backdrop of high suicide and suicidality rates, prompting the government to embed lifetime wellbeing duties, improve information and family support, strengthen health services, and tighten recruitment and discharge rules.

Key criticism

The strongest criticism raised in debate concerned the separately announced $5,000 annual allied-health funding cap — a budget measure outside this bill — which Simon Kennedy argued could restrict essential care for veterans with complex needs unless exemptions are fast and accessible. Kate Chaney, Phillip Thompson and Michael McCormack supported the broader reforms while seeking safeguards and practical implementation.

Who supported it?

Matt Keogh MP introduced this bill. Supportive speeches so far have come from Labor, LNP, Nationals, some crossbench members.

Introduced in House 25 June 2026
Passed House 02 July 2026
At second reading in Senate 02 July 2026
Not yet law

Did it become law?

Not yet

Final passage

No final vote yet

The bill has not yet completed passage through Parliament.

Days since introduction

43 days

Updated 07 Aug 2026.

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Defence law will make lifetime wellbeing, health and safety a formal priority for current and former ADFAustralia's military organisation, comprising the Navy, Army and Air Force. members and their families, including during transition from serviceThe period when an Australian Defence Force member leaves military service and moves into civilian life, which the bill treats as a time requiring stronger support..

  2. Defence, DVAThe Australian Government department responsible for veterans' compensation, health care, rehabilitation and support services. and other agencies will be able to use personal and sensitive informationPersonal information given extra privacy protection, such as health details, sexual orientation, ethnicity or criminal history. for wellbeing research and analysis, with consent generally required and de-identificationRemoving or changing identifying details so information cannot reasonably be linked to a particular person. required where reasonably possible.

  3. Defence health servicesThe health services provided through Defence, which support members' medical care, fitness for duty and longer-term wellbeing. will have a legal basis focused on both fitness for duty and lifelong wellbeing, with civilian-level quality standards and clearer limits on sharing health information.

  4. Defence can contact families directly about available support, while former partners affected by family violence may receive targeted, time-limited benefits to help them separate safely.

  5. The ADFAustralia's military organisation, comprising the Navy, Army and Air Force. must reject people convicted of serious violent or sexual offences and sentenced to imprisonment, while service can end automatically or by CDFThe senior uniformed leader of the Australian Defence Force, who would have powers under the bill to end a member's service in specified cases. decision if a member is unfit to continue.

Show source excerpts
  1. The Bill will amend the Defence Act 1903 (Defence Act) so that, for the first time, it includes a dedicated part relating to health and wellbeing support for ADF members, veterans and their families. This change provides a tangible legal and cultural commitment from the Parliament, the Government and the ADF to prioritise the lifetime wellbeing of Defence personnel, veterans and their families.
    Defence Legislation Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 2) explanatory memorandum
  2. It clarifies the ability of Defence, DVA and other Commonwealth agencies to collect, use and disclose information (including personal information and sensitive information) for a range of purposes in support of the wellbeing, health and safety of ADF members, veterans and their families, including research, data analysis and evaluation.
    Defence Legislation Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 2) explanatory memorandum
  3. For the first time, the Bill will establish a comprehensive legislative basis for Defence health services, supporting delivery of high standard health services to ADF members and certain other people involved with the ADF. The RCDVS Final Report highlighted the criticality of healthcare to the lifetime health and wellbeing of ADF members, as well as to increasing force capability and supporting commanders to discharge their command responsibilities in relation to the health and wellbeing of members. It emphasised the importance of good clinical governance in the Defence health system, including a program of continuous performance review supported by accurate measurement and analysis of clinical performance.
    Defence Legislation Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 2) explanatory memorandum
  4. The Bill will ensure that Defence is able to support Defence families more effectively. For example, it will ensure that Defence can directly engage with families where their contact details have been provided by an ADF member (rather than engaging with families through the ADF member). This will facilitate more direct advice to Defence families about the range of supports available to them, while providing an option to opt out if they do not want to engage directly with Defence (see recommendation 103 of the RCDVS Final Report).
    Defence Legislation Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 2) explanatory memorandum
  5. Paragraph 22A(1)(a) provides that, subject to subsection (2), a person must not be accepted for service if the person has been convicted of a serious violent or sexual offence and sentenced to a period of imprisonment, regardless of whether any part of the sentence was suspended. This is a new mandatory requirement that requires no discretion or judgement to be made. If a person has been convicted of a serious violent or sexual offence and sentenced to a period of imprisonment, that person must not be accepted to serve in the ADF. The definition of ‘serious violent or sexual offence’ is discussed below.
    Defence Legislation Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 2) explanatory memorandum

Broader context for this bill

Before this bill, Defence and the Department of Veterans’ Affairs already supported serving and former ADFAustralia's military organisation, comprising the Navy, Army and Air Force. members, while earlier Royal Commission reforms had begun adding oversight and changing veterans’ entitlements. The Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran SuicideThe national inquiry whose 2024 final report recommended reforms to reduce suicide and improve support for serving and former Defence personnel and their families.’s final report on 9 September 2024 exposed gaps against a backdrop of high suicide and suicidality rates, prompting the government to embed lifetime wellbeing duties, improve information and family support, strengthen health services, and tighten recruitment and discharge rules.

  1. 09 Sept 2024

    Royal Commission delivers its final report

    The Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran SuicideThe national inquiry whose 2024 final report recommended reforms to reduce suicide and improve support for serving and former Defence personnel and their families. delivered a final report with 122 recommendations aimed at reducing suicide and suicidality among serving and former ADFAustralia's military organisation, comprising the Navy, Army and Air Force. members.

    Hansard ↗
  2. 2025

    Earlier reforms establish Defence and DVAThe Australian Government department responsible for veterans' compensation, health care, rehabilitation and support services. oversight

    The Defence and Veterans’ Service Commission was established on the Royal Commission’s recommendation to provide oversight of Defence and DVAThe Australian Government department responsible for veterans' compensation, health care, rehabilitation and support services., creating an institutional base for further reforms.

    Defence Legislation Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 2) explanatory memorandum ↗
  3. 25 June 2026

    Matt Keogh MP introduces the bill

    Matt Keogh MP introduced the government bill in the House of Representatives, proposing reforms to lifetime wellbeing support, information use, health services, family assistance, recruitment and discharge.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  4. 02 July 2026

    House passes the bill

    The House agreed to the third reading, completing the bill’s passage through the originating chamber before its Senate stage.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 25 June 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 25 June 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade review 25 June 2026

Referred to Committee (25/06/2026): Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee; Report due 04/09/2026

Report due 04 Sep 2026

APH bill page notes
Second reading debate 01 July 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Sent to Federation Chamber for debate 01 July 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Referred to Federation Chamber

Federation Chamber debate 01 July 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate

House second reading agreed 01 July 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Returned from Federation Chamber 02 July 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Reported from Federation Chamber

House third reading agreed 02 July 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 02 July 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 02 July 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

The main case against this bill

The strongest criticism raised in debate concerned the separately announced $5,000 annual allied-health funding cap — a budget measure outside this bill — which Simon Kennedy argued could restrict essential care for veterans with complex needs unless exemptions are fast and accessible. Kate Chaney, Phillip Thompson and Michael McCormack supported the broader reforms while seeking safeguards and practical implementation.

Criticism was limited and mainly concerned funding, privacy and implementation rather than the bill’s overall policy direction.

Treatment cap could restrict care

A proposed $5,000 treatment capA separately announced $5,000 annual limit on funded allied-health treatment for veteran card holders. It is a budget measure administered through the Department of Veterans' Affairs, not a provision of this bill, and was criticised in debate because veterans with complex needs may require care costing more unless they receive an exemption. could leave veterans unable to afford essential allied health careHealth care provided by professionals other than doctors and nurses, such as psychologists, physiotherapists and occupational therapists., particularly where they have complex or ongoing needs. Critics warned that exemptions must be quick and easy to obtain.

Raised by Simon Kennedy and Kate Chaney Source ↗

Sensitive information needs protection

Expanded use and sharing of personal and sensitive informationPersonal information given extra privacy protection, such as health details, sexual orientation, ethnicity or criminal history. could create privacy risks if consent, de-identificationRemoving or changing identifying details so information cannot reasonably be linked to a particular person. and other safeguards are not strong enough in practice.

Raised by Phillip Thompson Source ↗

Reforms may add bureaucracy

The new arrangements could fail to improve veterans’ experiences if they add administrative complexity instead of producing faster, practical support and better coordination.

Raised by Michael McCormack Source ↗

Recorded votes

No recorded votes have been found yet for this bill.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Matt Keogh

Australian Labor Party • MP 25 June 2026

Keogh supports the bill as a necessary response to the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran SuicideThe national inquiry whose 2024 final report recommended reforms to reduce suicide and improve support for serving and former Defence personnel and their families., saying it will improve information sharing, health governance, family support, early intervention and service integrity for Defence members and veterans.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Phillip Thompson

Liberal National Party • MP 01 July 2026

Thompson says the coalition will allow the bill to pass because it advances important reforms supporting Defence personnel, veterans and their families.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

Kate Chaney

Independent • MP 01 July 2026

Kate Chaney supports the bill because it strengthens veterans' health and wellbeing, improves accountable information sharing and addresses serious misconduct in the Defence ForceAustralia's military organisation, comprising the Navy, Army and Air Force..

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Tim Ayres

Australian Labor Party • Senator 02 July 2026

Ayres supports the bill as a necessary response to the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran SuicideThe national inquiry whose 2024 final report recommended reforms to reduce suicide and improve support for serving and former Defence personnel and their families., arguing it will improve information sharing, health governance, family support, early intervention and service integrity for current and former ADFAustralia's military organisation, comprising the Navy, Army and Air Force. members and their families.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

9 speakers · 10 contributions · 9 support

  1. Matt Burnell Burnell supports the bill as a practical implementation of the veteran suicide royal commission's recommendations, arguing that better information sharing, health governance, family support and transition arrangements will enable earlier intervention and improve care for defence personnel and veterans.
    “What this bill demonstrates is a commitment to continue that work by the Albanese government. It demonstrates a willingness to translate recommendations into action. It demonstrates an understanding that the health and wellbeing of defence personnel, veterans and their families must remain a national priority. This legislation represents an important step on that journey. Through stronger information sharing, modernised health frameworks, improved family support, enhanced transition arrangements and better governance, it delivers meaningful reforms that will help build a more responsive and effective system. The Albanese Labor government remains committed to implementing the royal commission's recommendations and ensuring that genuine change follows from its work.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 01 July 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Tom French French supports the bill as a serious step toward implementing the royal commission's recommendations, arguing that better information sharing, modernised health services, family support and stronger accountability will help Defence personnel and veterans receive earlier, more coordinated care.
    “The Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide was a solemn warning. It told us that admiration for service is not enough. Thanks are not enough. Ceremonies are not enough. We honour service by building systems that reduce harm, treat people with dignity and respond before crisis becomes tragedy. This bill is a serious step in that direction. It directly implements 15 recommendations and supports a further 20. It strengthens information sharing for prevention and early intervention. It modernises Defence health services. It supports families, including in circumstances involving family and domestic violence. It improves service entry and exit arrangements. It strengthens governance and accountability. None of this removes the pain already experienced by families who have lost someone. No legislative amendment can do that, but parliament can act on what it has learned. It can ensure that the evidence given in the royal commission leads to durable reform. It can require Defence and DVA to work together more effectively. It can insist that the health, wellbeing and safety of those who serve and those who have served and their families sit at the centre of this system. That is what this bill seeks to do. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 01 July 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Joanne Ryan Ryan supports the bill as an important response to the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran SuicideThe national inquiry whose 2024 final report recommended reforms to reduce suicide and improve support for serving and former Defence personnel and their families., arguing that better information sharing, health services, family support and oversight will help prevent serving members, veterans and their families from falling through systemic gaps.
    “A nation that sends people to serve must not leave them to suffer alone. A parliament that hears the evidence must not look away. A government that accepts responsibility must act. The measure of our gratitude is whether our systems are there when the uniform comes off, when the injury is invisible, when the family is frightened and/or when the person who served reaches out for help. This bill will be remembered as part of a pathway whereby Australia will not only honour those who serve but build a future where every veteran, every serving member and every family can be seen, supported and able to look forward with hope. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 01 July 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Luke Gosling Gosling supports the bill as a practical implementation of the royal commission's recommendations, arguing that better information sharing, earlier intervention, modernised health services and stronger family support will improve care for Defence personnel, veterans and their families.
    “Together, these reforms enable Defence and DVA to better support personnel by intervening earlier; sharing and using data more effectively; and further equipping departments to protect the health, wellbeing and safety of those who serve, those who have served and their families.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 01 July 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. David Moncrieff Moncrieff supports the bill as a critical step in implementing the royal commission's recommendations, particularly by improving information sharing, claims processing and coordinated health and wellbeing support for veterans and their families.
    “The reality is that for far too long, too many veterans have put their lives at risk in the highest level of service to our country, only to struggle to adapt to civilian life while navigating a dauntingly complex support system. The Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide shone a light on the consequences of these critical safety nets failing to catch veterans when they needed help the most. Not only have the Albanese government voiced their ambition to fix this system, we have acted and we are delivering. For those who give everything, it is the responsibility of this government, of Defence and of community leaders to work hard at improving and strengthening the support system for our veterans, and to act at pace to reduce the tragic rate of suicide and suicidality in our defence community. The Albanese government takes this responsibility with the utmost seriousness and is committed to improving outcomes for our veterans. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 01 July 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Jo Briskey Briskey supports the bill because it implements key royal commission recommendations, improves information sharing between Defence and Veterans' AffairsThe Australian Government department responsible for veterans' compensation, health care, rehabilitation and support services., and enables earlier, coordinated support for veterans and their families while retaining privacy safeguards.
    “The men and women of our Defence Force put their hand up to serve our nation, to do hard and dangerous things on our behalf. We ask them to give up the ordinary safety the rest of us take for granted. The very least we owe them in return is a system that supports them, that talks to itself, that sees them coming and that never makes them carry both halves of their own story alone. A handful of volunteers at a small sub-branch in Kensington shouldn't have to do the system's job for it. With this bill, the system finally starts doing its own. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 01 July 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Ash Ambihaipahar Ambihaipahar supports the bill as a necessary step in implementing the royal commission's recommendations, particularly by enabling safeguarded information sharing between Defence and Veterans' AffairsThe Australian Government department responsible for veterans' compensation, health care, rehabilitation and support services. to improve early intervention, continuity of care and suicide prevention.
    “It is in that spirit of listening, acting and taking seriously the responsibility we owe to those who serve that I rise to support the Defence Legislation Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 2) Bill 2026. At its core, this bill is about information sharing. That might sound like a dry, technical phrase to some, but, for the families of those lost to suicide and for those currently serving who are silently struggling, it is anything but dry. It's about whether the right people in Defence and in the Department of Veterans' Affairs can see the full picture of a person's circumstances in time to intervene before a crisis becomes a tragedy. This bill creates the legislative authority for that information to move where it needs to move—between Defence and the DVA—underpinned by strong safeguards so that proactive support, early intervention and meaningful research and evaluation become possible rather than merely aspirational.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 01 July 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

3 speakers · 2 support · 1 unclear

  1. Simon Kennedy Simon Kennedy used the debate to criticise the government's treatment of veterans, focusing on the separately announced $5,000 annual allied-health funding cap — a budget measure that is not part of this bill — and called on the government to reverse it, arguing it would restrict essential care and worsen delays and financial strain.
    “This is not how a grateful country should treat those who've served it. For a veteran with a physical injury, delay can mean more than pain; it means less mobility, less work, less independence, and sometimes I hear them say to me it makes them feel less human. For a veteran with PTSD, delay can mean sleepless nights, anger, isolation, shame. It can fracture their relationships, fracture their sense of self. We don't live through that. Most of us watching at home will never live through what these men and women suffer. Just the uncertainty right now of passing a $5,000 cap in consulting afterwards is creating anxiety. We heard about up to 3,000 suicides in this population. Why are we doing this? Let's fix it. Let's act now. Let's say 'we got it wrong', fix it and make it right. Veterans need the peace of knowing that, when they reach out for treatment, the first response from their country will not be to ask whether they've crossed a spending threshold. It's time to make this right for veterans all around Australia, and I stand with you.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 01 July 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Michael McCormack McCormack says the coalition will support the bill because it implements 15 royal commission recommendations intended to strengthen personnel welfare, but cautions that the reforms must deliver tangible improvements without adding administrative complexity.
    “The Defence Legislation Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 2) Bill 2026 will be supported by the coalition, and it will be supported for these reasons. It directly implements 15 recommendations of the royal commission. Let us not forget that it was the coalition who introduced the royal commission, who ensured that it began. I know that when the royal commission came to Wagga Wagga it heard some harrowing evidence, and not just in Wagga Wagga, where we've got tri-service. We've got the Kapooka Army Recruit Training Centre. We've got Airpower starting at Wagga Wagga; it says so on the hangar facing the airport, the Royal Australian Air Force having been established there during the Second World War, if not before. And we've got 80 personnel serving in the Navy. It's a long way from the nearest drop of seawater, but we've got a very visible and active RAN presence in inland Wagga Wagga. Who would have thought? But it's strategic, it's good, it's proper, and those men and women are playing a fine role in the ADF.”

    National Party • MP • 01 July 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

1 speaker · 1 support

Full record

Full chat