Costs without better outcomes
The framework could create extra administration and expense without delivering direct compensation or reliably improving outcomes for passengers, with regional aviation operators particularly exposed.
This bill is currently before Parliament.
Transport & communications
Airlines will not lose an aviation licenceGovernment permission for certain airline operations. merely because they breach the new passenger-protection rules.
The government said the Airline Customer Advocate, an industry-run complaints service, was neither effective nor trusted. In 2025, domestic flights arrived on time 76.9 per cent of the time, below the long-term average of 80.5 per cent. Departures were on time 77.7 per cent of the time, while cancellations were 2.5 per cent, above the long-term rate of 2.2 per cent. The government committed $3.6 million across 2024–25 and 2025–26 to strengthen passenger protection and establish the wider framework.
Australia had long relied on the industry-led Airline Customer Advocate, created after the 2009 white paper, but aviation complaints rose after COVID-19 and the 2024 Aviation White Paper found the mechanism ineffective and untrusted. Following consultation, the government introduced this bill as part of a wider package creating enforceable standards, independent dispute resolution and government oversight for airline and airport services, while transferring unresolved aircraft-noise complaints to a statutory ombudsperson; the House passed it on 29 June 2026, but final passage is not shown.
Sam Birrell (National Party) argued that the wider package created more paperwork without direct compensation for delays, cancellations or damaged baggage. He said smaller regional operators could face added costs, while a promised exemption for airlines carrying fewer than one million passengers a year was not written into the bills. Monique Ryan (Independent) said passengers would still need to make a complaint because there was no fixed, automatic compensation. She also argued that Parliament had not received the passenger charter and that gaps could remain for charter flights and booking agents.
Hon Catherine King MP introduced this bill. Supportive speeches so far have come from Labor.
Did it become law?
Not yet
Final passage
No final vote yet
The bill has not yet completed passage through Parliament.
Days since introduction
128 days
Updated 07 Aug 2026.
Meaning
Airlines will not lose an aviation licenceGovernment permission for certain airline operations. merely because they breach the new passenger-protection rules.
People with unfinished aircraft-noise complaints can have their cases carried into the new system.
People with aircraft-noise complaints will not need to resubmit records already held by the existing complaints office.
Airlines and affected communities will see these changes start with the main Aviation Consumer Protection Act. They will not start if that Act does not.
Air Navigation Act 1920 1 Subsection 16(2) Repeal the subsection, substitute: (2) The reference in subsection (1) to applicable laws: (a) includes, in particular, laws relating to the following: (i) the entry or clearance of passengers; (ii) crew or cargo; (iii) immigration; (iv) passports; (v) customs; (vi) quarantine; and (b) does not include any of the following laws: (i) the Aviation Consumer Protection Act 2026; (ii) an instrument made under that Act; (iii) an instrument made under an instrument under that Act.Aviation Consumer Protection (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) introduced text
2 Application provision—Aircraft Noise Ombudsperson complaints (1) This item applies to a complaint if: (a) the complaint was made to the non‑statutory ombudsperson before commencement; and (b) the complaint is about an aircraft noise management agency’s management of aircraft noise in Australian territory; and (c) on commencement: (i) the complaint has not been resolved; and (ii) the complaint has not been withdrawn; and (iii) the non‑statutory ombudsperson has not made a decision to not deal with, or not continue to deal with, the complaint. (2) The complaint is taken, on and after cAviation Consumer Protection (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) introduced text
3 Transfer of documents and records (1) This item applies to any documents or records that: (a) are, immediately before commencement, in the non‑statutory ombudsperson’s possession; and (b) were given to, or created by, the non‑statutory ombudsperson in connection with the performance of its functions. (2) The document or records are to be transferred to the Aircraft Noise Ombudsperson after commencement.Aviation Consumer Protection (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) introduced text
2 Commencement (1) Each provision of this Act specified in column 1 of the table commences, or is taken to have commenced, in accordance with column 2 of the table. Any other statement in column 2 has effect according to its terms. Commencement information Commencement Date/Details 1. The whole of this Act At the same time as section 3 of the Aviation Consumer Protection Act 2026 commences. However, the provisions do not commence at all if that section does not commence.Aviation Consumer Protection (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) introduced text
Context
Australia had long relied on the industry-led Airline Customer Advocate, created after the 2009 white paper, but aviation complaints rose after COVID-19 and the 2024 Aviation White Paper found the mechanism ineffective and untrusted. Following consultation, the government introduced this bill as part of a wider package creating enforceable standards, independent dispute resolution and government oversight for airline and airport services, while transferring unresolved aircraft-noise complaints to a statutory ombudsperson; the House passed it on 29 June 2026, but final passage is not shown.
National Aviation Policy White Paper backs an industry-led complaints path
The policy led to an expectation that the aviation industry would develop an independent way to help consumers resolve complaints.
Aviation Consumer Protection (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum ↗Airline Customer Advocate is established
The industry-led advocate was created to assist consumers with unresolved airline complaints while the government monitored whether stronger intervention was needed.
Aviation Consumer Protection (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum ↗Aviation White Paper finds the complaints system ineffective
The white paper reported that the Airline Customer Advocate had not delivered an effective or trusted complaint-resolution mechanism as aviation complaints increased after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Why the bill was introduced ↗Government consults on new aviation consumer protections
The consultation paper set out a proposed framework and charter covering issues such as delays, cancellations, baggage, refunds and complaints handling.
Department of Infrastructure ↗Catherine King introduces the consequential amendments bill
The bill clarified that breaching a consumer-protection standard would not cancel an airline’s Air Navigation Act licence and began the transition to an independent statutory Aircraft Noise OmbudspersonAn independent reviewer of noise-complaint handling..
Hansard ↗Budget funds the passenger-rights overhaul
The federal budget allocated nearly $40 million for a new aviation consumer watchdog and complaints system that could support compensation for disrupted passengers.
ABC News ↗House passes the bill
The House agreed to the bill at third reading, completing its passage through the originating chamber before Senate consideration began.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Referred to Committee (01/04/2026): Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee; Committee report (19/06/2026)
Report tabled 19 Jun 2026
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Key criticism
Sam Birrell (National Party) argued that the wider package created more paperwork without direct compensation for delays, cancellations or damaged baggage. He said smaller regional operators could face added costs, while a promised exemption for airlines carrying fewer than one million passengers a year was not written into the bills. Monique Ryan (Independent) said passengers would still need to make a complaint because there was no fixed, automatic compensation. She also argued that Parliament had not received the passenger charter and that gaps could remain for charter flights and booking agents.
Birrell said the Coalition supported stronger passenger protections despite opposing this approach. Ryan acknowledged that an independent complaints service and a regulator able to enforce the rules were genuine improvements.
Costs without better outcomes
The framework could create extra administration and expense without delivering direct compensation or reliably improving outcomes for passengers, with regional aviation operators particularly exposed.
Passenger rights still too weak
The package did not guarantee fixed, automatic compensation for airline-controlled delays and cancellations, and critics sought stronger refund and reimbursement rights.
Regional impacts insufficiently tested
Missing detail and inadequate impact analysis left uncertainty about whether regional passengers and operators would receive equal protection or bear disproportionate costs.
Further sources
Votes
No recorded votes have been found yet for this bill.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
King supports the bill because it clarifies that an airline's breach of the consumer protection charter will not automatically cancel its licence and enables a smooth transition to the new statutory Aircraft Noise OmbudspersonAn independent reviewer of noise-complaint handling..
Read in Hansard ↗Sam Birrell opposes the bill, arguing it creates bureaucracy and costs without direct compensation or better outcomes for passengers, while potentially burdening regional aviation operators.
Read in Hansard ↗McCormack says the coalition will allow the bill to pass but will seek amendments to protect regional aviation, provide stronger compensation and refund rights, and hold Airservices Australia accountable.
Read in Hansard ↗Ryan says the package makes genuine improvements but is inadequate without stronger passenger rights.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
8 speakers · 7 support · 1 unclear
“This bill is not pretending every flight will run on time. It is not pretending every disruption can be avoided, and it is not pretending aviation can be simplified by legislation alone, but it does something important. It puts consumers back at the centre, it says trust has to be earned, it says accountability cannot be voluntary, it says passengers deserve better than confusion, delay and silence. This is practical Labor reform. It takes a system that was too unclear, too weak and too frustrating, and starts to build something stronger in its place—a system where standards are clear, complaints are heard fairly, industry is accountable and people are treated with dignity when plans fall apart. That is the kind of reform Australia expects from this parliament, and it is the kind of reform the Albanese Labor government is delivering. I am proud to support this bill, I am proud to support stronger protections for Australian travellers, and I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise in support of the Aviation Consumer Protection Bill 2026 and the other bills itemised. These bills together represent the most significant reform to aviation consumer rights here in this country in more than a decade. For too long, Australian travellers have felt powerless when flights are being delayed, cancelled or disrupted. For too long, people have been left stranded at airports, unable to get clear information, unable to access assistance and unable to resolve complaints in a fair and timely way. For too long, this system has effectively relied on airlines policing themselves. But Australians deserve better, and the Albanese Labor government is delivering a modern aviation system that puts passengers back in the centre of this conversation—a system that is fairer, a system that is much more transparent and a system that improves accountability across the aviation industry and, more importantly, a system that recognises that air travel is not a luxury for many Australians. It's an essential part of everyday life.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Aviation Consumer Protection (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill provides clarity that a breach by an airline of a standard in the Aviation Consumer Protections Charter will not result in the cancellation of a licence under the Air Navigation Act 1920.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to speak in support of the Aviation Consumer Protection Bill 2026 and the related bills. At its heart, this package is about a simple standard. Australians who pay for air travel should be treated fairly, told clearly what is happening and given a proper pathway when things go wrong. That should not be controversial. In a country like Australia, aviation is not just another service; it is part of how our nation functions.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I look forward to going back to my community and telling them that the next time they travel after saving for that well-earned holiday or to care for a sick parent a disruption or a cancellation will mean compensation, not frustration. That's one less thing they'll need to worry about when weighing up their budget. This legislation will mean fewer Marias sitting at an airport gate frustrated, fewer families absorbing costs that should have been the airline's and fewer residents feeling like their concerns about aircraft noise have vanished into a bureaucratic void. It will mean Australia finally has an aviation consumer protection framework that reflects our modern, fair-minded country—one that stands with every passenger and brings real accountability to a crucial industry. I'm proud to be part of a government delivering it, because my community relies on the success of our aviation industry, and that industry relies on my community and on the many others who pass through it every day. I commend the bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Third, the bills establish the Aviation Consumer Protection Authority. The authority will be a dedicated regulator within the department to enforce the charter and to take on the systemic problems in the sector, not just one complaint at a time. Where the ombudsperson helps the individual traveller, the regulator looks at the bigger patterns to make sure the industry is held to account if necessary. This framework is about meaningful protection for passengers while keeping aviation competitive, affordable and sustainable, including the regional routes that so many of our regional and remote communities depend on—in particular, my state of Queensland. There is a balance, and these bills achieve that balance.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Aviation Consumer Protection (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill provides clarity that a breach by an airline of a standard in the Aviation Consumer Protections Charter will not result in the cancellation of a licence under the Air Navigation Act 1920.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The original question was that this bill be now read a second time. To this the honourable member for Riverina moved as an amendment that all words after 'That' be omitted with a view to substituting other words. The honourable member for Kooyong has now moved as an amendment to that amendment that all words after 'notes that' be omitted with a view to substituting other words. The question now is that the amendment moved by the honourable member for Kooyong to the amendment moved by the honourable member for Riverina be agreed to.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 1 support · 1 oppose
“But supporting stronger protections is not the same as supporting this piece of legislation, because these bills deliver more bureaucracy than accountability, more costs than compensation and more processes than outcomes. Australians do not want another complaints body to write to after their holiday is already ruined; they want fewer cancellations, fewer delays and better communication. In the instances where we can't get the airlines to perform better in relation to those things, they need real compensation when things go wrong. But instead Labor has delivered a framework built around complaints and paperwork after the damage is already done, and the damage has been considerable.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition strongly supports the objective of improving consumer protections for travellers. However, in our view, this legislation falls far short of community expectations. It creates new bureaucracies but fails to address many of the concerns passengers have had. It does not provide direct compensation. It leaves too much to regulations. It imposes unquantified costs on regional aviation, and it does not ensure consumers retain access to their own money through unused flight credits. The coalition will propose amendments in the Senate to protect regional aviation, enhance consumer protection, strengthen accountability and deliver fairer outcomes for Australian travellers.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 1 mixed · 1 unclear
“(a) table a draft Charter with mandatory minimum content before the bill proceeds to a third reading; and”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“However, there are credible questions surrounding this bill and whether it will achieve its aim. I hope the government will work in good faith across the parliament to ensure that the benefits from these bills will flow to all consumers, including those flying in and out of regional airports. Thank you.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee
Report tabled 19 Jun 2026
Referred to Committee (1 Apr 2026): Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee; Committee report (19 June 2026)
APH bill page notes