Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve)

Current status

This bill became law on Apr 1st, 2026.

Policy area

Budget, tax & economy

What does this bill do?

Sets up a national reserveA government-managed reserve of important supplies, such as fuel and critical minerals, to help Australia deal with shortages or supply disruptions. for fuel, critical mineralsMinerals that are important for industry, technology or security and may be hard to obtain if global supply chains are disrupted. and other key supplies so Australia can respond to supply shocks and global instability.

Why was it introduced?

The current conflict in the Middle East and wider geopolitical volatility exposed risks to Australia’s access to fuel, critical mineralsMinerals that are important for industry, technology or security and may be hard to obtain if global supply chains are disrupted. and other disrupted supplies. The bill lets Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government., when directed by ministers, buy, sell and selectively stockpile strategic materials through a government-backed Strategic ReserveA government-managed reserve of important supplies, such as fuel and critical minerals, to help Australia deal with shortages or supply disruptions..

Broader context

Australia already had Minimum Stockholding Obligation fuel holdings, including 30 days of diesel and jet fuel and 39 days of petrol, but the Iran war exposed how quickly imported fuel, fertiliser and other critical supply chains could be disrupted. After reports of a national fuel crisis, diesel at about $3.16 a litre and the release of pre-existing petrol and diesel stocks, the bill gave Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government. a government-directed role in buying, selling and selectively stockpiling fuel, critical mineralsMinerals that are important for industry, technology or security and may be hard to obtain if global supply chains are disrupted. and other strategic supplies.

Key criticism

The strongest criticism was that the bill rushed a large expansion of Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government.’s powers, leaving taxpayers exposed to open-ended market losses and giving ministers broad long-term discretion over reserveA government-managed reserve of important supplies, such as fuel and critical minerals, to help Australia deal with shortages or supply disruptions. transactions. That concern was raised mainly by crossbench MPs, while the Coalition still supported the bill but argued it was overdue, too limited, and did not do enough for domestic fuel and fossil-fuel supply.

Who supported it?

Senator Nita Green introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in House 30 Mar 2026
Passed House 30 Mar 2026
Passed Senate 31 Mar 2026
Became law 01 Apr 2026

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 01 Apr 2026

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

6 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Passage speed

1 day

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Sets up a national reserveA government-managed reserve of important supplies, such as fuel and critical minerals, to help Australia deal with shortages or supply disruptions. for fuel, critical mineralsMinerals that are important for industry, technology or security and may be hard to obtain if global supply chains are disrupted. and other key supplies so Australia can respond to supply shocks and global instability.

  2. Lets Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government. buy, sell and selectively stockpile fuel, critical mineralsMinerals that are important for industry, technology or security and may be hard to obtain if global supply chains are disrupted. and other disrupted supplies when the government directs it.

  3. Keeps reserveA government-managed reserve of important supplies, such as fuel and critical minerals, to help Australia deal with shortages or supply disruptions. transactions under ministerial control, with the Australian Government taking the risks, losses and profits from those deals.

  4. Allows Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government. to make equity investments for export projects from its commercial account, not only government-directed deals.

  5. Requires an independent review of the law every five years, with the first review completed before the end of 2029.

Show source excerpts
  1. The Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026 would create a Strategic Reserve (Reserve) of materials vital for Australia’s economy, fuel security, supply chain resilience, national security and Future Made in Australia ambitions. The Reserve would ensure Australia’s preparedness to address supply chain disruption of materials, goods or things, including fuel and other commodities, as a result of market volatility and geopolitical events (including the current conflict in the Middle East). Critical minerals would also be captured under the Bill as a strategic material to give legislative effect to the Government’s decision to establish a new critical minerals strategic Reserve (announced by the Government on 12 January 2026). The critical minerals strategic Reserve is intended to position Australia as a trusted and stable partner in high value, vulnerable critical minerals supply chains.
    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) explanatory memorandum
  2. The Bill would provide Export Finance Australia (EFA) with new functions and tools to deliver the Reserve’s objectives including to secure, sell and selectively stockpile fuel, critical minerals, and other materials, goods, or things that may be imported into Australia, or could be produced in Australia, and are experiencing, or are vulnerable to experiencing, supply chain disruptions. The intent would be to ensure domestic availability as and when directed by Government. EFA is a corporate Commonwealth entity with an independent board responsible for managing EFA’s affairs, including determining its strategy, defining its risk appetite and monitoring its performance.
    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) explanatory memorandum
  3. In accordance with the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Act 1991 (EFIC Act), the Minister for Trade and Tourism may direct EFA to enter into transactions on behalf of the Australian Government provided that the Minister is satisfied it is in the national interest for EFA to do so (Part 5 of the EFIC Act). In these transactions (known as ‘national interest account (NIA) transactions’), the Minister for Trade and Tourism takes the investment decision following referral from the EFA Board. The Minister directs EFA to undertake the transaction on the terms and conditions agreed by the Australian Government. The Australian Government bears all risks and losses, and receives all profits, for NIA transactions.
    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) explanatory memorandum
  4. Item 12 of the Bill would repeal subsection 23(5), including the note, and allow EFA to make a loan under this section in the form of an equity investment without needing to refer an application to the Minister under section 25 (that is, EFA would be able to make equity investments to finance eligible export transactions on its commercial account, in addition to the national interest account).
    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) explanatory memorandum
  5. The Bill would insert into a new section 90A of the EFIC Act a requirement for a periodic independent review of the operation and effectiveness of the EFIC Act (and any instruments made under the Act). The purpose of the review is to broadly consider the operation of the EFIC Act, including the scope of the Act, EFA’s functions and governance, and whether any amendments to the Act are necessary or desirable to improve the operation or effectiveness of the Act. The review would occur every five years after the completion of the previous review to ensure the EFIC Act remains fit for purpose.
    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) explanatory memorandum

Broader context for this bill

Australia already had Minimum Stockholding Obligation fuel holdings, including 30 days of diesel and jet fuel and 39 days of petrol, but the Iran war exposed how quickly imported fuel, fertiliser and other critical supply chains could be disrupted. After reports of a national fuel crisis, diesel at about $3.16 a litre and the release of pre-existing petrol and diesel stocks, the bill gave Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government. a government-directed role in buying, selling and selectively stockpiling fuel, critical mineralsMinerals that are important for industry, technology or security and may be hard to obtain if global supply chains are disrupted. and other strategic supplies.

  1. 12 Oct 2025

    Mining industry calls for critical mineralsMinerals that are important for industry, technology or security and may be hard to obtain if global supply chains are disrupted. stockpile

    Domestic mining companies urged the Albanese government to accelerate the development of a national reserveA government-managed reserve of important supplies, such as fuel and critical minerals, to help Australia deal with shortages or supply disruptions. to support the critical mineralsMinerals that are important for industry, technology or security and may be hard to obtain if global supply chains are disrupted. sector.

    Australian Financial Review ↗
  2. 12 Jan 2026

    Government pursues international mining partnerships

    Resources Minister Madeleine King explored mineral supply agreements with G7 nations while acknowledging the significant time required for these projects to become profitable.

    Australian Financial Review ↗
  3. March 2026

    Fuel shortages and price surges impact regional Australia

    Rising diesel costs and supply disruptions created significant economic pressure for agricultural producers and small businesses across the country.

    BILLS;Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026, Appropriation (Fuel Security Response) Bill (No. 1) 2025-2026, Appropriation (Fuel Security Response) Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026;Second Reading - 30 Mar 2026 ↗
  4. 28 Mar 2026

    Government reveals strategic reserveA government-managed reserve of important supplies, such as fuel and critical minerals, to help Australia deal with shortages or supply disruptions. plan

    Following consultations with National Cabinet and industry leaders, the government announced new measures to secure essential supplies of fuel and fertilisers.

    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) explanatory memorandum ↗
  5. 30 Mar 2026

    House passes the bill

    The House of Representatives rapidly debated and approved the legislation to address urgent supply chain and fuel security concerns.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  6. 31 Mar 2026

    Emergency fuel stocks released to the public

    The government authorised the release of up to 20 per cent of mandatory petrol and diesel reserves to alleviate shortages in the hardest-hit regions.

    BILLS - Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026 - Second Reading ↗
  7. 31 Mar 2026

    Senate passes the bill

    The legislation passed the Senate, granting Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government. the legal authority to manage and stockpile critical strategic supplies.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 30 Mar 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 30 Mar 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 30 Mar 2026

Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.

House second reading agreed 30 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House third reading agreed 30 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 31 Mar 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 31 Mar 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 31 Mar 2026

Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.

Senate second reading agreed 31 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Detailed Senate review 31 Mar 2026

Senators examined the bill in detail and considered amendments clause by clause.

Committee of the Whole debate

Senate third reading agreed 31 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

The main case against this bill

The strongest criticism was that the bill rushed a large expansion of Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government.’s powers, leaving taxpayers exposed to open-ended market losses and giving ministers broad long-term discretion over reserveA government-managed reserve of important supplies, such as fuel and critical minerals, to help Australia deal with shortages or supply disruptions. transactions. That concern was raised mainly by crossbench MPs, while the Coalition still supported the bill but argued it was overdue, too limited, and did not do enough for domestic fuel and fossil-fuel supply.

Criticism was mostly conditional; the bill still attracted broad support as an emergency fuel-security measure.

Broad powers and taxpayer risk

Critics warned that the bill lets government direct large reserveA government-managed reserve of important supplies, such as fuel and critical minerals, to help Australia deal with shortages or supply disruptions. purchases and sales with too little upfront scrutiny, creating open-ended financial exposure if markets move against the Commonwealth.

Raised by Monique Ryan MP and other crossbench MPs Source ↗

Need for tighter oversight and earlier review

Some supporters said the emergency powers should be more tightly limited, more transparent, and reviewed sooner than the bill required, because they could operate well beyond the immediate fuel shock.

Raised by Allegra Spender MP, Zali Steggall MP and Kate Chaney MP Source ↗

Too little support for domestic fuel and energy production

Coalition MPs supported passage but argued the bill was a stopgap that would not fix underlying supply problems unless the government also backed domestic oil, gas and other practical energy production.

Raised by Coalition MPs including Darren Chester, Michelle Landry, Sam Birrell and Michael McCormack Source ↗

Possible clashes with climate and environment laws

Proposed amendments sought reviews or changes to deal with possible conflicts between the reserveA government-managed reserve of important supplies, such as fuel and critical minerals, to help Australia deal with shortages or supply disruptions. powers and other laws, especially the Safeguard Mechanism and environmental restrictions affecting fossil-fuel projects.

Raised by Barnaby Joyce MP, the Coalition and One Nation through defeated amendments Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

30 Mar 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

31 Mar 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Amendments at a glance

Recorded amendment and procedural votes grouped by chamber. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.

House

Defeated

Review conflicts with the Safeguard Mechanism

Aye 43 No 91

Moved by Barnaby Joyce (One Nation). Defeated 43 to 91. Support came from LNP of Queensland, Liberal, Nationals, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

30 Mar 2026

Its defeat left no House call for that conflict review.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 88
LNP of Queensland 15 / 0
Liberal 12 / 0
Nationals 8 / 0
Independent 6 / 2
One Nation 1 / 0
Centre Alliance 1 / 0
Greens 0 / 1
Defeated

Condemn government fuel crisis response

Aye 38 No 96

Moved by Alison Penfold (The Nationals). Defeated 38 to 96. Support came from LNP of Queensland, Liberal, Nationals, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents.

30 Mar 2026

Its defeat avoided adding that criticism to the House record.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 88
LNP of Queensland 15 / 0
Liberal 13 / 0
Nationals 8 / 0
Independent 0 / 7
One Nation 1 / 0
Centre Alliance 1 / 0
Greens 0 / 1
Defeated

Restore EFA support for oil, gas and coal

Aye 38 No 97

Moved by Dan Tehan (Liberal Party of Australia). Defeated 38 to 97. Support came from LNP of Queensland, Liberal, Nationals, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents.

30 Mar 2026

Its defeat kept the fossil fuel funding restriction in place.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 88
LNP of Queensland 15 / 0
Liberal 13 / 0
Nationals 8 / 0
Independent 0 / 8
One Nation 1 / 0
Centre Alliance 1 / 0
Greens 0 / 1

Senate

Defeated

Restore fossil fuel support and ease EPBC restrictions

Aye 26 No 36

Defeated 26 to 36. Support came from One Nation, Nationals, UAP, and LNP of Queensland. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents. One cross-floor vote was recorded: A. L. McLachlan (Liberal) voted no. Liberal had split recorded votes.

31 Mar 2026

Its defeat kept both fossil fuel restrictions in force.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 24
Liberal 17 / 1
Greens 0 / 9
One Nation 4 / 0
Nationals 3 / 0
Independent 0 / 2
UAP 1 / 0
LNP of Queensland 1 / 0
Defeated

Make powers temporary and narrow eligible goods

Aye 11 No 36

Defeated 11 to 36. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, and Nationals.

31 Mar 2026

Its defeat left the powers ongoing and broadly framed.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 24
Greens 9 / 0
Liberal 0 / 5
One Nation 0 / 4
Independent 2 / 0
Nationals 0 / 2
UAP 0 / 1
Defeated

Independent review of legal conflicts within six months

Aye 27 No 32

Defeated 27 to 32. Support came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and UAP. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

31 Mar 2026

Its defeat meant no extra mandatory independent review was added.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 22
Liberal 17 / 0
Greens 0 / 9
One Nation 4 / 0
Nationals 3 / 0
Independent 1 / 1
UAP 1 / 0
LNP of Queensland 1 / 0

These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Lead opposing voice Opposes

Monique Ryan

Independent • MP 30 Mar 2026

Ryan argues against passing the bill as drafted, saying it rushes a major expansion of Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government. with too little scrutiny and exposes taxpayers to open ended market and fiscal risks.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Darren Chester

The Nationals • MP 30 Mar 2026

Chester says the coalition will support the bill because it is a practical crisis measure to help secure fuel and fertiliser supplies, but he argues it is only a limited response and criticises the government for mishandling fuel security.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

Allegra Spender

Independent • MP 30 Mar 2026

Allegra Spender supports the bill because she sees a legitimate role for government and Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government. in securing fuel supplies during market turmoil, though she warns the powers are broad and wants the review brought forward.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Basem Abdo

Australian Labor Party • MP 30 Mar 2026

Basem Abdo supports the bill and wants it passed, arguing it gives the government practical new powers to secure fuel supplies, stabilise prices and protect households, businesses and regional communities during a global disruption.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

6 speakers · 6 support

  1. King Madeleine King strongly backs the bill and wants it passed because it creates the strategic reserveA government-managed reserve of important supplies, such as fuel and critical minerals, to help Australia deal with shortages or supply disruptions. for critical mineralsMinerals that are important for industry, technology or security and may be hard to obtain if global supply chains are disrupted., fuel and other key supplies, which she says will strengthen Australia's economic and national security.
    “I support all aspects of the strategic reserve within this bill. It ensures our fuel security as well as security of other strategic materials and will ensure our security of strategic critical minerals and rare earths. Australia, under the leadership of this government, is stepping up to take responsibility to lead globally on critical minerals and rare earth elements, and I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Green Senator Green supports the bill and wants it passed urgently, saying it will create a strategic reserveA government-managed reserve of important supplies, such as fuel and critical minerals, to help Australia deal with shortages or supply disruptions. and give Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government. new powers to secure fuel, critical mineralsMinerals that are important for industry, technology or security and may be hard to obtain if global supply chains are disrupted. and other essential supplies during global disruptions.
    “That's why today's bill is so urgent. This Bill creates a Strategic Reserve to secure the supply of strategic materials that are vital for Australia's economy.”

    Labor • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Wong Wong supports the bill and urges the Senate to pass it because it gives Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government. stronger powers to secure and finance critical fuel and other supplies during the Middle East disruption.
    “I thank the officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and from Export Finance Australia who worked around the clock to deliver this key piece of legislation so quickly. This bill is a testament to what can be achieved to advance Australia's national interest when we bring together all arms of statecraft. This bill is an act of economic resilience, and I encourage all in the Senate to support this legislation.”

    Labor • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. O'Neill Senator O'Neill supports the bill and says it gives Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government. the powers needed to help secure fuel and other critical imports during volatile global conditions.
    “Export Finance Australia needs new powers to finance the import of fuel and other necessary goods. In this parliament we talk all the time about making sure our farmers have urea. We've heard from the housing industry that we need things like PVC piping, and more and more conversations with stakeholders will reveal critical things that need to come into the country. This very elegant vehicle will allow Export Finance Australia to: provide financial derivatives; provide price support; purchase, sell and stockpile fuel and other necessary goods to ensure domestic availability as and when directed by government; and financially hedge resulting exposures as appropriate.”

    Labor • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Farrell Farrell strongly backs the bill and says it should pass because it gives Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government. new powers to secure fuel and other critical supplies during global disruptions.
    “On behalf of the government, EFA will be able to underwrite the purchase of shiploads of fuel to get them here to Australia. It can provide insurance, derivatives, loans and other arrangements to make sure that those companies can go and get those cargoes for Australia and Australians. These new fuel security powers will put Australia in a strong position, securing fuel supplies where the cost may be prohibitive for private suppliers to source on commercial terms without government support. We will not wait for a crisis to get worse before doing what is needed. We are preparing for future challenges and getting ahead of the curve to shield Australians from the worst of this global uncertainty. Establishing these strategic powers is in our national interest and must pass the parliament today or tonight.”

    Labor • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

11 speakers · 12 contributions · 10 support · 1 unclear

  1. Taylor Taylor says the opposition will support the bill because it helps bring fuel into Australia during the crisis, but he argues the government acted too late and should go further by improving supply movement, transparency and support for oil and gas.
    “There's a second part of moving the fuel, which is to make sure fuel from offshore gets to our country. This bill is playing a role in supporting that. We do support that part of what this bill is doing. I think this is an important initiative, and we will absolutely support that, but it has taken too long. They were moving the fuel. They were moving all of the petrol, from one of our two remaining refineries, offshore. They were exporting it. They needed to move that fuel not off to Asia or wherever it was going but to regional communities and those 600 servos that didn't have fuel.”

    Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Birrell Birrell says the coalition will support the bill because it is a practical crisis measure to help keep fuel and other essential imports flowing during the supply shockA serious interruption to the movement or availability of goods, materials or inputs needed by businesses or the public..
    “In closing, it's important, and Australians need immediate relief. I do congratulate the government on moving on the fuel excise; I think that was important. It came as a result of a call from the opposition last week. I think it's good that the government responded to that call in a positive way. We are supporting this bill. I think this is another good initiative by the government. Again, it will be made stronger if the government could look at this amendment and, in the same way they said that fuel excise from the coalition is a good idea, say that these amendments are a good idea too. Let's agree to them and make this legislation stronger.”

    The Nationals • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Penfold Penfold says the coalition will support the bill as a necessary crisis measure to help finance fuel imports, but argues it is only a limited stopgap that does not cut prices now or support small distributors and domestic energy production.
    “While I support the decision and the bill that's before us today, my concern remains that there is still a matter of the availability of fuel right now, because if small operators cannot afford to buy fuel, then there'll be no fuel at the bowser. It's that simple. Yes, we will support this bill as a necessary step. But I want to say to the government: please do not stop here. Fix the underlying policy settings. Restore support for Australian energy production. Support the entire fuel supply chain, not just those at the top end, and deliver real immediate relief to Australians doing it tough. Restoring fuel security is not just about imports, it's about ensuring that every part of the supply chain, from producer to distributor to small service station, can keep Australia moving. My constituents, and all Australians, deserve nothing less.”

    The Nationals • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. McCormack McCormack supports the bill as part of the response to the fuel security crisis, but says it must properly back practical energy supply by including oil, gas and coal.
    “The situation with our liquid fuels is that 50 per cent of the nation's imports by weight are liquid fuels. You can add another 10 per cent on top of that with petrochemicals. We need to do everything we can to ensure that those ships continue, that those contracts are met. We also need to make sure, as the member for Nicholls said, that the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026 takes into account the absolute need to ensure that oil, gas and coal are part of this government's deliberations and regulations and legislation. Export Finance had this mandate not that long ago, under this government, to reject and rebuff those fossil fuels. Haven't we been caught with our pants down. Haven't we been caught short when it comes to ensuring that we have ready-made Australian supplies on hand and available.”

    The Nationals • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Webster Webster supports the bill as a necessary response to the fuel security crisis, saying the government is finally doing what the coalition had already called for.
    “I want to congratulate the government and the Prime Minister for today doing precisely what the coalition recommended, on Friday, that he do. It only took four days, after four weeks of not a lot happening—a lot of meetings, but not a lot happening. We called for the halving of the fuel excise and the reduction of the heavy-vehicle road user charge. In fact, this last week I've spoken with the Trucking Association and I've also spoken with the bus industry; both were very concerned about the costs that they were incurring. In my electorate, nine earth-moving employees have found themselves without a job this week because the employer cannot pay what he's being required to pay for fuel. Twenty-six cents a litre—yes, we suggested it; we think it makes a difference. Removing the road user charge for heavy vehicles impacts the trucks on the road. Earth moving, basically, as far as I understand, is on land; therefore, it won't incur that cost. I'm happy to be corrected on that.”

    The Nationals • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Wallace Wallace supports the bill and says stronger fuel security is needed, but he argues the government acted too late after ignoring clear warnings and leaving households, industry and defence exposed to shortages and higher costs.
    “I prefaced my speech by saying that I thought this was a useful contribution on the part of the government, albeit too little, too late. The cost of energy in this country has absolutely skyrocketed under this government over the last four years, and that is not just as a result of the war. The inflation rate that is now 3.7 per cent in this country is not just because of the war. This government was mismanaging inflation long before the war. This government promised us $275 price reductions. We have seen increases in energy costs of around 30 per cent under this government.”

    Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Tehan Tehan says the opposition will support the fuel security bills because they finally take steps to secure oil and diesel supply during the crisis, but he argues the government acted far too late and mishandled both supply and fuel prices.
    “The fact that we're here today with this rushed legislation coming through, which the opposition have been happy to support because we were given a briefing at seven o'clock last night, shows that the government is literally chasing its tail in trying to deal with this national fuel crisis. I'll give you the most classic example as to why they're doing that. We're making changes to the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Act so that they can deal with getting oil here to Australia. Guess what they did last year? They sent a message to EFA, a statement of expectations, saying: 'You're not to touch oil. You're not to touch gas. You're not to touch coal.' And, yet, here we are today, and they've finally realised that oil's important. They had no idea that diesel powers 50 per cent of our energy in this nation—50 per cent! Fishing, farming and mining are all dependent on diesel. They had no idea about the importance of diesel and no idea about the importance of coal and gas to our nation, especially when you have something like a war taking place. The government had to be led kicking and screaming to admit there was a national crisis going on. Now, finally, they seem to be taking some measures to deal with supply. I hope they're successful, and that's why we're happy to support it.”

    Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Landry 2 contributions Landry says the coalition will support the bill because it gives Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government. a practical way to secure essential imports like fuel and fertiliser during a crisis.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Landry on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    BILLS;Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026, Appropriation (Fuel Security Response) Bill (No. 1) 2025-2026, Appropriation (Fuel Security Response) Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026;Second Reading - 30 Mar 2026 The Nationals • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Landry says the coalition will support the bill because it gives Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government agency that supports export and investment projects. Under this bill, it would also carry out reserve transactions when directed by the government. a practical way to secure essential imports like fuel and fertiliser during a crisis. She argues it is only a short-term measure and criticises the government for poor preparation and for failing to strengthen domestic fuel security.

    “In that context, we are debating this bill. Let me be clear, the coalition will support it, because this bill does something practical. It allows Export Finance Australia to step in during extraordinary disruptions to help secure essential imports like fuel and fertiliser. That is a sensible measure. In a crisis, governments should be able to act quickly to support supply chains to ensure that essential goods can reach Australia. We will always support practical steps that help keep the country moving, but we also need to be honest about what this bill is and what it is not. This bill is not a silver bullet. It does not get fuel to empty service stations today. It does not bring down prices at the bowsers tomorrow. And it does not fix the underlying problem that left Australia exposed in the first place.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    BILLS;Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026;Second Reading - 30 Mar 2026 The Nationals • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Landry says the coalition will support the bill because securing fuel supply matters, but argues the government must do more with greater urgency, back Australian production and provide immediate cost-of-living relief.

    “The coalition's position is clear. We will support this bill because securing supply matters, but we will also continue to call on the government to do more—to act with urgency, to back Australian production and to deliver immediate cost-of-living relief, because restoring fuel security is not just about imports and financing; it's about protecting living standards, it's about supporting small businesses and it is about making sure Australian families can get ahead, not fall behind. Australians deserve a government that is prepared, responsive and focused on their needs. Right now they are looking for leadership, and they need action.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  9. Canavan Canavan says the Nationals will support the bill because it recognises that oil, diesel and petrol are strategically important, but he argues Labor has acted too late and says he will move amendments to reverse broader anti fossil fuel policies.
    “So welcome back to the Labor Party. Welcome back to the land of common sense and the planet called Earth. It's just a little bit late, and I do think there are still shortcomings with this approach, which, unfortunately, may cause issues for us in the future. As I say, we will happily guide the Labor Party back to planet Earth. We've been here. We never left, so we know the way around here, and we'll help them get this bill through the Senate at the last minute. But, in doing so, I want to flag that we will move some amendments that would, once and for all, see Labor's war on fossil fuels end. If the Labor Party doesn't support these very reasonable amendments, we will see that their last-minute conversion to these issues is fake one. It's not real. They are just trying to manage themselves from one political crisis to another, not to really solve the issues ahead of our nation.”

    Nationals • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Bragg Bragg uses the debate to argue Australia is dangerously underprepared for an energy and security crisis and says the government has failed to boost domestic oil, gas and renewables.
    “There is one clear fact that comes out of this crisis, and that is that Australia is massively underprepared for what are very dangerous times. We live in extremely dangerous times, where we have a slew of countries that hate our democratic traditions and hate our free societies. Do you know what the best insurance policy for dangerous times would have been? An abundance of energy, all forms of energy—all the stuff that is underneath our feet in this country or even in the sun above us. We should have had an abundance of energy, because this is going to be a massive race over the next 20 or 30 years, as to who can get the most energy. It is an insane position for Australia to be a massive exporter of fossil fuels but not use them ourselves, just as it is insane for Australia not to be able to use renewables on an industrial scale just as we do in households. So we need more of everything, but this government has had no plan to protect Australia against the disruption that we now see in the Middle East, which was entirely predictable.”

    Liberal • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Greens

1 speaker · 1 mixed

  1. Waters Waters says the Greens support urgent fuel security action during the crisis, but they want this bill changed because it gives ministers sweeping permanent powers far beyond the emergency.
    “The government clearly have a mindset of 'Don't waste a crisis', and they're using the urgency of the fuel crisis as cover to give themselves sweeping powers to invest in anything at all in the future, and that could include things like weapons manufacturing. I will point out that this is not limited to the duration of the fuel crisis; they are forever powers. That's why the Greens have asked the government to make these emergency measures temporary and sunset after six months. That's why I will be moving an amendment to do just that. The government has not made the case to extend these measures any longer, nor have they made the case that a minister should be able to make these decisions without bringing them back to parliament for a review, as is the normal role of the Senate, which is why I have a second committee-stage amendment to correct that. Our third committee-stage amendment seeks to rule out any use of this new power to perpetuate war or to invest in weapons—very commonsense guardrails that I urge the Senate to support. People deserve support. They didn't ask for this war. They definitely didn't ask for the chaos that it's causing. And here we are still so desperately reliant on foreign fossil fuels when we have an abundance of renewable energy that we could be electrifying our transport fleet with, making sure that people's daily needs are met and we have safe renewable energy independence. (Time expired)”

    Greens • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

One Nation

4 speakers · 4 support

  1. Joyce Joyce supports the bill as a useful step to help secure fuel supplies, but says it is only a partial measure and wants the government to review it for conflicts with other laws, especially the Safeguard Mechanism.
    “This amendment talks to how we should look at what we're about to do, which I commend—in fact, I work with the government to do it, which I commend—but we've got to make sure that it doesn't start running into further obstacles the moment the fuel starts arriving in Australia. If we don't have fuel, then we don't have food. It's a pretty simple equation. If we don't have the reliability of fuel, then the first question people will ask in the country is: can I plant? And is the cost of planting so excessive that it's not worth planting, so should I reduce how much and reduce the risk? The next question will be: do we have fertiliser so that we get a fair return from planting? The next question will be: do I have security of fuel throughout the term of the crop? The last question will be: do I have the fuel to take the crop off, and do people have the fuel to take the crop away? That's whether it's carrots, barley, wheat or cattle. It doesn't matter. I don't think this nation has properly addressed that issue.”

    One Nation • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Whitten Whitten says One Nation will support the bill because boosting fuel reserves is urgent for national security, even though he argues it is only a second-best fix for years of government failure on fuel security and domestic refining.
    “We support the bill because fuel in the tank is non-negotiable for national security, but at what cost? We will not pretend that this legislation is anything other than a second-best remedy for policy failure. The real test of this parliament will be: what do we do next? Will we slash the red and green tape that has strangled new exploration and refineries? Will we build the processing capacity that turns our resources into high-value Australian-made products? Will we be a partner of industry to get the most from our resources instead of a roadblock? Or will we simply congratulate ourselves for patching the holes in the ship? This bill deserves passage, but it's a long way short.”

    One Nation • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Hanson Hanson supports building a strategic fuel reserveA government-managed reserve of important supplies, such as fuel and critical minerals, to help Australia deal with shortages or supply disruptions. because Australia has been left dangerously exposed by low onshore fuel stocks, but she argues the bill is only part of the answer and says Australia also needs more domestic fuel production and other emergency measures.
    “It didn't have to be this way. Increased onshore reserves of fuel would have given us some breathing room. They would have allowed us to cushion the impact of the war on fuel prices. Increased domestic production of oil would have further cushioned the impact. We have the resources, about 17 billion barrels worth around $1.7 trillion, which could be easily developed. We could make diesel out of coal or gas. Many other countries do this. But we've had no political leadership or will to make these resources work in the national interest.”

    One Nation • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Bell Senator Bell supports the bill as an emergency response to the fuel crisis, but says it came too late and will not solve the deeper problem because the government ignored warnings and left Australia exposed.
    “Now we are moving emergency legislation to respond to this crisis that they wanted to pretend wasn't happening. If not for us fighting them tooth and nail, forcing them to act, I don't know if we'd even be here today, moving this legislation. It was a complete failure of leadership. That delay, that denial and that incompetence matters. It matters because a month wasted matters. It's a month too late now for farmers who were unable to plant their crops on time or harvest their crops on time. It's a month too late for transport operators, trying to keep goods moving across this country, who are now facing exorbitant bills. It's a month too late for regional communities who are already being smashed by higher fuel costs. And that delay means they will be facing higher costs for longer. It's a month too late to shield Australians from the absolute worst of the fuel shock that has now flooded through this economy. If we'd acted sooner, the problems would have been less severe.”

    One Nation • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

7 speakers · 6 support · 1 oppose

  1. Steggall Steggall supports the bill as a necessary short term emergency measure to keep fuel flowing during the current shock, but says it is only a stopgap and must be tightly limited and reviewed sooner.
    “The central idea in this legislation is sound, and I will support it to address a temporary emergency situation. It gives Export Finance Australia a flexible set of tools—insurance, derivatives, loans and other arrangements—to derisk additional cargoes to encourage suppliers to bid for discretionary shipments. But these laws need guardrails to ensure these powers are temporary and not used to finance fossil fuels for any longer than would address the immediate fuel security crisis. To that end, I would urge the government to consider a much earlier period of review for this legislation.”

    Independent • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Chaney Kate Chaney says she will support the bill so the government can respond quickly to the fuel supply crisis, but she warns that it gives the executive very broad long term powers and must be matched by transparency, taxpayer protections and proper oversight.
    “As I understand it, this bill was originally conceived to establish a strategic reserve for critical minerals. But, in response to the unfolding international crisis, the government has hastily redrafted it, expanding the scope of Export Finance Australia's powers so that it can enter into and support transactions to shore up fuel and other strategic supplies. When supply chains are under stress and prices are spiking, Australians expect the government to act. For that reason, I will support this bill to enable the government to respond quickly to the current crisis. But this bill also asks parliament to place a great deal of trust in the executive, trust in the breadth of the powers being granted, trust in a new and expanded role for EFA and trust that taxpayers will be adequately protected when public money is used to underwrite private risk, and it's those issues that I want to focus on today. But, first, let's look at what the bill actually does.”

    Independent • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Sharkie Sharkie supports the bill, saying it gives the government important powers to finance fuel imports and manage stockpiles to deal with the current fuel crisis and reduce future supply risks.
    “The Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026 provides new powers to do, I think, two very important things—(1) finance the import of fuel and other necessary goods and (2) provide financial derivatives and price point support to purchase, sell and stockpile fuel and other necessary goods to ensure domestic availability only on government direction and to manage exposures as appropriate, providing flexibility to deal with the current fuel crisis now and to stabilise supply and avoid escalation and destabilisation in the future. It will help the government to manage Australia's exposure to risk around acquisition and delivery of fuel in the unpredictable and destabilised global environment that we're currently in. I would like to thank Mr Farrell for the very early morning detailed briefing on this legislation.”

    Centre Alliance • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Tyrrell Tyrrell supports the bill because it would create strategic reserves and help the government protect Australia from fuel and critical mineral supply disruptions.
    “Straight up, I'll be supporting the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026, which will create strategic reserves for fuel and critical minerals and give the government the ability to better respond to future disruptions to supply chains.”

    Independent • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Pocock Pocock supports the bill because he says the government should step in to protect fuel and other strategic supplies during crises.
    “I rise to speak in support of the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026. When supply chains are disrupted and prices spike, Australians expect their government to act—to step in where markets fall short and to protect the national interest. That's why this bill has my support, and I commend the government on bringing it forward so quickly. In times of heightened geopolitical uncertainty, there is a clear and legitimate role for government to stabilise outcomes and maintain supply of the things that we need.”

    Independent • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat