Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve)

Current status

This bill became law on Apr 1st, 2026.

Policy area

Budget, tax & economy

What does this bill do?

Fuel importers can receive government-backed loans, guarantees or insurance to bring extra supplies to Australia when commercial risks are too high.

Why was it introduced?

Chris Bowen (Labor) said war in the Middle East had made imported fuel more expensive and riskier for businesses to secure. The government had already released up to 20 per cent of required petrol and diesel stocks. Australia held 30 days of diesel and jet fuel and 39 days of petrol, which together represent about 95 per cent of refined-fuel use. The government also committed $1.2 billion to a reserve for critical mineralsListed minerals important to technology, energy or defence. — materials needed for products such as renewable-energy and defence technology.

Broader context

Australia already depended on imports for about 90 per cent of its liquid fuels, while the government had committed to a Critical MineralsListed minerals important to technology, energy or defence. Strategic ReserveGovernment-supported supplies kept or secured for disruptions. and a rare-earths project was seeking export-agency finance. The Middle East conflict then disrupted global energy supply chains, causing fuel price and supply shocks; the government responded by giving Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers. powers to secure, stockpile and sell fuel, critical mineralsListed minerals important to technology, energy or defence. and other vulnerable supplies, and Parliament passed the measure on 31 March before Royal Assent turned it into an Act on 1 April 2026.

Key criticism

Larissa Waters of the Australian Greens argued the bill gave ministers broad, permanent powers to support almost any disrupted import without enough parliamentary oversight. David Pocock (Independent) warned that taxpayers could carry private losses without clear information or a share of any gains. Tyron Whitten of Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party said the bill could increase supply but would not cut petrol prices, and called it a late response to years of weak fuel planning.

Who supported it?

Chris Bowen MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in House 30 Mar 2026
Passed House 30 Mar 2026
Passed Senate 31 Mar 2026
Became law 01 Apr 2026

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 01 Apr 2026

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

3 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Passage speed

2 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Fuel importers can receive government-backed loans, guarantees or insurance to bring extra supplies to Australia when commercial risks are too high.

  2. Businesses handling essential supplies can be supported to buy, sell, transport or store goods threatened by supply-chain disruptions.

  3. Critical-minerals businesses can receive support for materials on Australia’s official list. The reserve will initially focus on antimony, gallium and rare earth elements.

  4. Taxpayers carry the costs and risks of reserve deals approved as nationally important. Money earned from those deals generally returns to the Commonwealth.

  5. Australian exporters and overseas infrastructure projects can receive share investments from Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers. without first referring them to the minister.

  6. Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers. committee members can be paid for committee work, including members who also sit on its board.

  7. The public gets an independent review of the law before 31 December 2029, followed by reviews every five years.

Show source excerpts
  1. 14 After section 23B 23BA Arrangements and other things to support EFIC’s Strategic Reserve function (1) EFIC may do one or more of the following things for the purposes of EFIC’s Strategic Reserve function: (a) enter into a contract of insurance or indemnity; (b) give a guarantee; (c) make a loan; (d) enter into an arrangement of another kind to facilitate any of the following things, including an arrangement for a third party to do such a thing: (i) buy, sell, transport or store a strategic material; (ii) buy or sell rights to, or relating to, a strategic material; (e) enter into an
    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Act 2026
  2. (1) EFIC may do one or more of the following things for the purposes of EFIC’s Strategic Reserve function: (a) enter into a contract of insurance or indemnity; (b) give a guarantee; (c) make a loan; (d) enter into an arrangement of another kind to facilitate any of the following things, including an arrangement for a third party to do such a thing: (i) buy, sell, transport or store a strategic material; (ii) buy or sell rights to, or relating to, a strategic material; (e) enter into an arrangement of any other kind specified in an instrument under subsection (3).
    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Act 2026
  3. strategic material means: (a) a thing specified in the list titled Critical Minerals List published by the Department administered by the Resources Minister, as existing from time to time; or
    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Act 2026
  4. 66AA SR arrangements in the national interest (1) This section applies to an SR arrangement if the arrangement is entered into by EFIC in accordance with an approval or direction under Part 5. (2) Subject to subsection (7), EFIC is required to pay to the Commonwealth, from time to time, as directed by the Finance Minister, all of the receipts by EFIC from SR arrangements to which this section applies. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2), the receipts from an SR arrangement are calculated by deducting from the total of the amounts received by EFIC in relation to the arrangement all amount
    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Act 2026
  5. 12 Subsection 23(5) Repeal the subsection (including the note). 13 Subsection 23A(4) Repeal the subsection (including the note).
    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Act 2026
  6. 47 After section 47 48 Remuneration and allowances for committee members Committee members who are also Board members (a) a committee member is also a Board member; and (b) the Board decides that the committee member is to be remunerated in relation to the member’s committee membership; the committee member is to be paid the remuneration that is determined by the Remuneration Tribunal. If no determination of that remuneration by the Tribunal is in operation, the committee member is to be paid the remuneration that is determined under subsection (4). (2) A committee member who is a Board
    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Act 2026
  7. 49 After section 90 90A Periodic reviews of the operation and effectiveness of this Act (1) The Minister must cause periodic independent reviews to be conducted in relation to the operation and effectiveness of: (a) this Act; and (b) any instruments made under this Act. (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the review must include consideration of: (a) the scope of this Act; and (b) EFIC’s functions; and (c) EFIC’s governance; and (d) whether amendments to this Act, including to expand the scope of this Act, are necessary or desirable to improve the operation or effectiveness of this A
    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Act 2026

Broader context for this bill

Australia already depended on imports for about 90 per cent of its liquid fuels, while the government had committed to a Critical MineralsListed minerals important to technology, energy or defence. Strategic ReserveGovernment-supported supplies kept or secured for disruptions. and a rare-earths project was seeking export-agency finance. The Middle East conflict then disrupted global energy supply chains, causing fuel price and supply shocks; the government responded by giving Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers. powers to secure, stockpile and sell fuel, critical mineralsListed minerals important to technology, energy or defence. and other vulnerable supplies, and Parliament passed the measure on 31 March before Royal Assent turned it into an Act on 1 April 2026.

  1. 24 Apr 2025

    Government commits to a Critical MineralsListed minerals important to technology, energy or defence. Strategic ReserveGovernment-supported supplies kept or secured for disruptions.

    Prime Minister Anthony Albanese committed to establish a reserve to maximise the strategic value of Australia's critical mineralsListed minerals important to technology, energy or defence..

    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) explanatory memorandum ↗
  2. 12 Aug 2025

    Arafura seeks export-agency funding for a rare-earths project

    Arafura Rare Earths was reported to be seeking $100 million in funding from Australia's export agency, highlighting demand for support in critical-minerals supply chains.

    Reuters ↗
  3. 12 Jan 2026

    Government announces the Critical MineralsListed minerals important to technology, energy or defence. Strategic ReserveGovernment-supported supplies kept or secured for disruptions.

    The government announced the new reserve as part of its effort to strengthen Australia's position in vulnerable critical-minerals supply chains.

    Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) explanatory memorandum ↗
  4. March 2026

    Middle East conflict disrupts global fuel supply chains

    By 31 March, MPs said the conflict, including Iran's weaponisation of the Strait of Hormuz, had disrupted global energy markets and contributed to Australian fuel price and supply shocks.

    Hansard ↗
  5. 30 Mar 2026

    Chris Bowen MP introduces the bill

    Chris Bowen MP introduced the bill in the House of Representatives to create the Strategic ReserveGovernment-supported supplies kept or secured for disruptions. and expand Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers.'s role in securing vulnerable supplies.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  6. 31 Mar 2026

    Parliament passes the bill

    Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage of the Strategic ReserveGovernment-supported supplies kept or secured for disruptions. measure.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  7. 01 Apr 2026

    Royal Assent turns the bill into an Act

    The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, allowing the new Strategic ReserveGovernment-supported supplies kept or secured for disruptions. powers to operate as law.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 30 Mar 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 30 Mar 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 30 Mar 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

House second reading agreed 30 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House third reading agreed 30 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 31 Mar 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 31 Mar 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 31 Mar 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate second reading agreed 31 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Committee of the Whole debate 31 Mar 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate third reading agreed 31 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Passed both houses 31 Mar 2026

Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.

Finally passed both Houses

Assent 01 Apr 2026

The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.

The main case against this bill

Larissa Waters of the Australian Greens argued the bill gave ministers broad, permanent powers to support almost any disrupted import without enough parliamentary oversight. David Pocock (Independent) warned that taxpayers could carry private losses without clear information or a share of any gains. Tyron Whitten of Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party said the bill could increase supply but would not cut petrol prices, and called it a late response to years of weak fuel planning.

All three supported action to protect fuel supplies. Labor's Don Farrell said the powers were needed because private suppliers could find fuel cargoes too expensive to secure without government help.

Broad powers and taxpayer risk

The bill gives Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers. wide, ongoing powers to arrange strategic-reserve deals, but critics feared weak scrutiny could leave taxpayers carrying losses without sharing enough of any financial upside. They called for greater transparency, stronger oversight, tighter time limits and an earlier review.

Raised by Monique Ryan, Allegra Spender, Zali Steggall and Kate Chaney Source ↗

No quick relief or domestic solution

Critics said financing emergency imports may limit shortages but would not immediately reduce fuel costs or end Australia’s dependence on overseas supplies. They argued that domestic production, refining, onshore reserves and alternative transport energy also needed attention.

Raised by Michelle Landry, Anne Webster, Alison Penfold, Sam Birrell, Rebekha Sharkie, Andrew Wallace and Darren Chester Source ↗

Consumer and supply-chain safeguards

Concerns were raised that emergency financing alone would not prevent price gouging or ensure assistance reached independent distributors and regional service stations. Critics sought protections covering consumers and smaller businesses across the fuel supply chain.

Raised by Monique Ryan, Alison Penfold and Darren Chester Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

30 Mar 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

31 Mar 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Amendments at a glance

Recorded amendment and procedural votes grouped by chamber. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.

Senate

Defeated

Remove restrictions on support for fossil-fuel projects

Aye 26 No 36

Defeated 26 to 36. Support came from One Nation, Nationals, and UAP. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents. One cross-floor vote was recorded: Andrew McLachlan Csc (Liberal) voted no. Liberal had split recorded votes.

31 Mar 2026

The vote preserved the existing statutory restrictions relating to fossil fuels.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 24
Liberal 18 / 1
Greens 0 / 9
One Nation 4 / 0
Nationals 3 / 0
Independent 0 / 2
UAP 1 / 0

Did not vote: Liberal Party

Defeated

Limit the reserve powers and exclude military goods

Aye 11 No 36

Defeated 11 to 36. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, and Nationals.

31 Mar 2026

The vote retained the bill's broader definition of materials that could be included in the strategic reserveGovernment-supported supplies kept or secured for disruptions..

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 24
Greens 9 / 0
Liberal 0 / 5
One Nation 0 / 4
Independent 2 / 0
Nationals 0 / 2
UAP 0 / 1

Did not vote: Liberal Party

Defeated

Require an early review of conflicts with environmental laws

Aye 27 No 32

Defeated 27 to 32. Support came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and UAP. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

31 Mar 2026

The vote left the strategic reserveGovernment-supported supplies kept or secured for disruptions. legislation without this additional independent review requirement.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 22
Liberal 18 / 0
Greens 0 / 9
One Nation 4 / 0
Nationals 3 / 0
Independent 1 / 1
UAP 1 / 0

Did not vote: Liberal Party

These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Chris Bowen

Australian Labor Party • MP 30 Mar 2026

Bowen supports the bill because it gives Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers. flexible powers to secure fuel and strategic materials, helping Australia manage supply disruptions and strengthen critical-minerals supply chains.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Darren Chester

National Party • MP 30 Mar 2026

Chester says the coalition supports the bill because it gives Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers. practical tools to secure essential imports during major supply disruptions, but argues it is not a complete solution and seeks amendments while pressing for domestic production, immediate fuel-cost relief and protection for smaller distributors.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Unclear

Allegra Spender

Independent • MP 30 Mar 2026

Spender views the bill as a useful expansion of Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers.'s role, but warns that its broad powers do not guaranteeA promise to cover another party's financial obligation. sovereign capability or a public return and calls for an earlier review.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Basem Abdo

Australian Labor Party • MP 30 Mar 2026

Abdo supports the bill as a timely, practical measure that lets the Commonwealth act early through Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers. to secure fuel and other essential goods, stabilise supply and strengthen Australia's resilience to global disruptions.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

7 speakers · 7 support

  1. Madeleine King Madeleine King strongly supports the bill, arguing that its new financing and stockpiling tools will strengthen fuel security and secure critical-mineral supply chains amid unreliable global markets.
    “I support all aspects of the strategic reserve within this bill. It ensures our fuel security as well as security of other strategic materials and will ensure our security of strategic critical minerals and rare earths. Australia, under the leadership of this government, is stepping up to take responsibility to lead globally on critical minerals and rare earth elements, and I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Nita Green Green supports the bill because it would give Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers. flexible powers to secure fuel, critical mineralsListed minerals important to technology, energy or defence. and other strategic materials, protecting Australia from supply disruptions and strengthening economic and national security.
    “Establishing this Strategic Reserve is in our national interest, now, and in the future.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Penny Wong Wong urges the Senate to pass the bill, arguing that its expanded strategic reserveGovernment-supported supplies kept or secured for disruptions. and financing powers will help secure critical supplies, strengthen Australia's economic resilience and protect businesses and households from global disruptions.
    “I thank the officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and from Export Finance Australia who worked around the clock to deliver this key piece of legislation so quickly. This bill is a testament to what can be achieved to advance Australia's national interest when we bring together all arms of statecraft. This bill is an act of economic resilience, and I encourage all in the Senate to support this legislation.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Deborah O'Neill O'Neill supports the bill as a vital part of the National Fuel Security Plan, arguing that new financing, purchasing and risk-management powers for Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers. will help maintain supplies of fuel and other essential goods during market disruption.
    “Export Finance Australia needs new powers to finance the import of fuel and other necessary goods. In this parliament we talk all the time about making sure our farmers have urea. We've heard from the housing industry that we need things like PVC piping, and more and more conversations with stakeholders will reveal critical things that need to come into the country. This very elegant vehicle will allow Export Finance Australia to: provide financial derivatives; provide price support; purchase, sell and stockpile fuel and other necessary goods to ensure domestic availability as and when directed by government; and financially hedge resulting exposures as appropriate.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Don Farrell Farrell urges Parliament to pass the bill, arguing that its new financing powers and $1.2 billion Critical MineralsListed minerals important to technology, energy or defence. Strategic ReserveGovernment-supported supplies kept or secured for disruptions. will strengthen Australia's access to fuel, fertiliser and critical mineralsListed minerals important to technology, energy or defence. during supply chain disruptions.
    “On behalf of the government, EFA will be able to underwrite the purchase of shiploads of fuel to get them here to Australia. It can provide insurance, derivatives, loans and other arrangements to make sure that those companies can go and get those cargoes for Australia and Australians. These new fuel security powers will put Australia in a strong position, securing fuel supplies where the cost may be prohibitive for private suppliers to source on commercial terms without government support. We will not wait for a crisis to get worse before doing what is needed. We are preparing for future challenges and getting ahead of the curve to shield Australians from the worst of this global uncertainty. Establishing these strategic powers is in our national interest and must pass the parliament today or tonight.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

12 speakers · 14 contributions · 8 support · 4 unclear

  1. Angus Taylor Angus Taylor says the opposition will support the bill's emergency assistance to secure offshore fuel supplies, but argues it is overdue and should go further by allowing support through Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers.'s commercial account as well as its national account.
    “There's a second part of moving the fuel, which is to make sure fuel from offshore gets to our country. This bill is playing a role in supporting that. We do support that part of what this bill is doing. I think this is an important initiative, and we will absolutely support that, but it has taken too long. They were moving the fuel. They were moving all of the petrol, from one of our two remaining refineries, offshore. They were exporting it. They needed to move that fuel not off to Asia or wherever it was going but to regional communities and those 600 servos that didn't have fuel.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Sam Birrell Sam Birrell says the coalition will support the bill as a sensible way to secure essential fuel and fertiliser imports during major disruptions, while arguing it will not provide immediate relief or fix Australia's dependence on overseas supplies.
    “The supply of diesel right now to the farming areas is absolutely critical. A group of Western Australian wheat and barley farmers told me that they'll probably need 35 litres of diesel a hectare for the entire crop cycle. That's the sowing, the spraying of the weeds, the top dress of urea and then the harvest, so it's significant. They're wanting to know that there is going to be security of supply and that cost is going to be under control, because the cost of that 35 litres and whether you can get it in the first place is part of the decision-making process for how much crop you put in and whether you'll have the margins to make it a viable exercise. It's absolutely critical for agriculture. The coalition's position on this bill is that it will support it. We think this is a sensible measure. In a crisis, the government should act to keep supply chains moving and ensure essential imports like fuel and fertiliser can reach Australia.”

    National Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Alison Penfold Penfold says the coalition will support the bill as a necessary crisis measure to finance essential fuel and fertiliser imports, but argues it will not provide immediate relief or fix Australia's weak domestic fuel capability.
    “While I support the decision and the bill that's before us today, my concern remains that there is still a matter of the availability of fuel right now, because if small operators cannot afford to buy fuel, then there'll be no fuel at the bowser. It's that simple. Yes, we will support this bill as a necessary step. But I want to say to the government: please do not stop here. Fix the underlying policy settings. Restore support for Australian energy production. Support the entire fuel supply chain, not just those at the top end, and deliver real immediate relief to Australians doing it tough. Restoring fuel security is not just about imports, it's about ensuring that every part of the supply chain, from producer to distributor to small service station, can keep Australia moving. My constituents, and all Australians, deserve nothing less.”

    National Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Michael McCormack Michael McCormack argues the bill must ensure oil, gas and coal remain eligible for export finance because Australia needs reliable domestic fuel supplies, but he does not clearly state whether he will support its passage.
    “The situation with our liquid fuels is that 50 per cent of the nation's imports by weight are liquid fuels. You can add another 10 per cent on top of that with petrochemicals. We need to do everything we can to ensure that those ships continue, that those contracts are met. We also need to make sure, as the member for Nicholls said, that the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026 takes into account the absolute need to ensure that oil, gas and coal are part of this government's deliberations and regulations and legislation. Export Finance had this mandate not that long ago, under this government, to reject and rebuff those fossil fuels. Haven't we been caught with our pants down. Haven't we been caught short when it comes to ensuring that we have ready-made Australian supplies on hand and available.”

    National Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Anne Webster Anne Webster criticises the bill as rushed crisis legislation and argues that the government should instead have strengthened domestic fuel production, refining and reserves before shortages emerged.
    “The Albanese government, by contrast, have accused Australians of panic buying—and they were still doing it today—while they have been panic legislating. We can only say that this Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026 is another piece of 'quick, let's get it out the door by tonight'. The Prime Minister said, 'Let's just get it moving.' Hardly any Labor members are speaking on it because of the urgency. This is the pattern that we are seeing time and time again from this government—lost in the waves in the ocean of despair because it really doesn't know what it's doing. We will see a shortened debate today, for sure, and the bill sent to the Senate so that we have laws passed by Good Friday.”

    National Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Andrew Wallace Wallace welcomes the bill as a useful measure to strengthen fuel security, but says the government acted too late despite foreseeable supply risks and worsening diesel shortages.
    “At the outset I'd like to say that this bill, the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill, is welcome. But, as with just about everything this government does, it had to be dragged, kicking and screaming, to ultimately get around to doing it. The concept of liquid fuel security is so incredibly important in this country. You didn't have to be a brain surgeon to work out that a war in the Middle East, or a war just about anywhere in the world right now, was going to place significant pressure on our supply chains—but particularly a war in the Middle East.”

    Liberal National Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Dan Tehan Tehan says the opposition will support the bill because it could help secure fuel supplies during the national crisis, while criticising the government for acting too late.
    “The fact that we're here today with this rushed legislation coming through, which the opposition have been happy to support because we were given a briefing at seven o'clock last night, shows that the government is literally chasing its tail in trying to deal with this national fuel crisis. I'll give you the most classic example as to why they're doing that. We're making changes to the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Act so that they can deal with getting oil here to Australia. Guess what they did last year? They sent a message to EFA, a statement of expectations, saying: 'You're not to touch oil. You're not to touch gas. You're not to touch coal.' And, yet, here we are today, and they've finally realised that oil's important. They had no idea that diesel powers 50 per cent of our energy in this nation—50 per cent! Fishing, farming and mining are all dependent on diesel. They had no idea about the importance of diesel and no idea about the importance of coal and gas to our nation, especially when you have something like a war taking place. The government had to be led kicking and screaming to admit there was a national crisis going on. Now, finally, they seem to be taking some measures to deal with supply. I hope they're successful, and that's why we're happy to support it.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Michelle Landry 2 contributions Landry says the coalition will support the bill because it gives Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers. a practical way to secure essential imports during severe supply disruptions, but argues it will not provide immediate fuel relief or fix Australia's underlying lack of domestic fuel resilience.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Michelle Landry on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech National Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Landry says the coalition will support the bill because it gives Export Finance AustraliaThe federal agency administering the new reserve powers. a practical way to secure essential imports during severe supply disruptions, but argues it will not provide immediate fuel relief or fix Australia's underlying lack of domestic fuel resilience.

    “In that context, we are debating this bill. Let me be clear, the coalition will support it, because this bill does something practical. It allows Export Finance Australia to step in during extraordinary disruptions to help secure essential imports like fuel and fertiliser. That is a sensible measure. In a crisis, governments should be able to act quickly to support supply chains to ensure that essential goods can reach Australia. We will always support practical steps that help keep the country moving, but we also need to be honest about what this bill is and what it is not. This bill is not a silver bullet. It does not get fuel to empty service stations today. It does not bring down prices at the bowsers tomorrow. And it does not fix the underlying problem that left Australia exposed in the first place.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech National Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Landry says the coalition will support the bill because securing fuel supplies matters, while urging the government to act faster, back Australian production and provide immediate cost-of-living relief.

    “The coalition's position is clear. We will support this bill because securing supply matters, but we will also continue to call on the government to do more—to act with urgency, to back Australian production and to deliver immediate cost-of-living relief, because restoring fuel security is not just about imports and financing; it's about protecting living standards, it's about supporting small businesses and it is about making sure Australian families can get ahead, not fall behind. Australians deserve a government that is prepared, responsive and focused on their needs. Right now they are looking for leadership, and they need action.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  9. Matthew Canavan Canavan says he will help pass the bill because strategic reserves recognise the essential role of liquid fuels, but criticises Labor for acting too late and plans amendments to reverse restrictions on support and approvals for fossil fuel projects.
    “So welcome back to the Labor Party. Welcome back to the land of common sense and the planet called Earth. It's just a little bit late, and I do think there are still shortcomings with this approach, which, unfortunately, may cause issues for us in the future. As I say, we will happily guide the Labor Party back to planet Earth. We've been here. We never left, so we know the way around here, and we'll help them get this bill through the Senate at the last minute. But, in doing so, I want to flag that we will move some amendments that would, once and for all, see Labor's war on fossil fuels end. If the Labor Party doesn't support these very reasonable amendments, we will see that their last-minute conversion to these issues is fake one. It's not real. They are just trying to manage themselves from one political crisis to another, not to really solve the issues ahead of our nation.”

    Liberal National Party • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Andrew Bragg Bragg argues that Australia is dangerously unprepared for energy disruptions and needs greater domestic energy production, but he does not clearly state whether he supports the bill.
    “There is one clear fact that comes out of this crisis, and that is that Australia is massively underprepared for what are very dangerous times. We live in extremely dangerous times, where we have a slew of countries that hate our democratic traditions and hate our free societies. Do you know what the best insurance policy for dangerous times would have been? An abundance of energy, all forms of energy—all the stuff that is underneath our feet in this country or even in the sun above us. We should have had an abundance of energy, because this is going to be a massive race over the next 20 or 30 years, as to who can get the most energy. It is an insane position for Australia to be a massive exporter of fossil fuels but not use them ourselves, just as it is insane for Australia not to be able to use renewables on an industrial scale just as we do in households. So we need more of everything, but this government has had no plan to protect Australia against the disruption that we now see in the Middle East, which was entirely predictable.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  11. Terry Young 2 contributions Young's position on the bill is unclear because the supplied paragraph only records procedural amendments to the second reading motion and contains no substantive view on whether the bill should pass.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Terry Young on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Liberal National Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Young's position on the bill is unclear because the supplied paragraph only records procedural amendments to the second reading motion and contains no substantive view on whether the bill should pass.

    “The original question was that this bill be now read a second time. To this, the honourable member for Lyne moved as an amendment that all words after 'that' be omitted with a view to substituting other words. The honourable member for New England has now moved as an amendment to that amendment that all words after 'whilst' be omitted with a view to substituting other words. The question now is that the amendment moved by the honourable member for New England to the amendment moved by the member for Lyne be agreed to.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Liberal National Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    The supplied text only records procedural amendments and does not reveal Terry Young's position on the bill.

    “Order. In accordance with the resolution agreed to earlier, the time allotted for this debate has expired. The original question was that this bill be now read a second time, to which the honourable member for Lyne moved as an amendment that all words after 'that' be omitted with a view to substituting other words. The honourable member for New England has moved as an amendment to that amendment that all words after 'whilst' be omitted with a view to substituting other words.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

Greens

1 speaker · 1 support

  1. Larissa Waters Waters supports the bill's emergency fuel-security measures but argues its permanent, unchecked ministerial powers amount to a blank cheque.
    “The government clearly have a mindset of 'Don't waste a crisis', and they're using the urgency of the fuel crisis as cover to give themselves sweeping powers to invest in anything at all in the future, and that could include things like weapons manufacturing. I will point out that this is not limited to the duration of the fuel crisis; they are forever powers. That's why the Greens have asked the government to make these emergency measures temporary and sunset after six months. That's why I will be moving an amendment to do just that. The government has not made the case to extend these measures any longer, nor have they made the case that a minister should be able to make these decisions without bringing them back to parliament for a review, as is the normal role of the Senate, which is why I have a second committee-stage amendment to correct that. Our third committee-stage amendment seeks to rule out any use of this new power to perpetuate war or to invest in weapons—very commonsense guardrails that I urge the Senate to support. People deserve support. They didn't ask for this war. They definitely didn't ask for the chaos that it's causing. And here we are still so desperately reliant on foreign fossil fuels when we have an abundance of renewable energy that we could be electrifying our transport fleet with, making sure that people's daily needs are met and we have safe renewable energy independence. (Time expired)”

    Australian Greens • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

One Nation

4 speakers · 3 support · 1 unclear

  1. Barnaby Joyce Joyce supports the bill as a vital measure to secure fuel on the spot market, but says it will only mitigate the supply crisis and calls for a review of potential conflicts with the Safeguard Mechanism and other laws.
    “This is talking about securing up the spot market, which is vitally important. If we don't do that, it's going to exacerbate the problem.”

    Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Tyron Whitten Whitten supports the bill as an urgent step to strengthen Australia's fuel supply and national security, but calls it a second-best response to successive governments' failure to maintain refineries, domestic processing and strategic reserves.
    “We support the bill because fuel in the tank is non-negotiable for national security, but at what cost? We will not pretend that this legislation is anything other than a second-best remedy for policy failure. The real test of this parliament will be: what do we do next? Will we slash the red and green tape that has strangled new exploration and refineries? Will we build the processing capacity that turns our resources into high-value Australian-made products? Will we be a partner of industry to get the most from our resources instead of a roadblock? Or will we simply congratulate ourselves for patching the holes in the ship? This bill deserves passage, but it's a long way short.”

    Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Pauline Hanson Hanson does not clearly state whether she supports the bill, but argues that Australia urgently needs greater fuel self-sufficiency and stronger preparations for future supply crises.
    “These measures will help address the current crisis, but we need to go much further to make sure we're ready for the next crisis, because if you think this current crisis is bad then just wait and see what will happen to Australia's economy and trade if communist China makes good on its threat to attack Taiwan. We can fix this vulnerability, but we must act quickly. We must scrap net zero. Not only does it cost us trillions of dollars and cripple our economy, with no impact on global emissions increases; it prevents us from investing in development of our own sovereign fuel industry and creating the energy independence needed to keep Australians moving.”

    Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Sean Bell Sean Bell supports the emergency fuel-security legislation, but says it comes too late and will not fix Australia's dependence on overseas fuel supplies.
    “But, as serious as this crisis is, Australians must not fool themselves into thinking that this is the full extent of the danger, or that these measures that we're putting through today will solve the danger. They will not. What we're dealing with now is only a warning. The current disruption has exposed just how fragile Australia has become. We are too dependent on overseas supply chains. We are too slow to prepare for shocks. We do not have the resources. We can no longer make the fuel we need in our own country to protect ourselves from these predictable crises. And that is because of Labor's obsession with net zero, which is why One Nation's position is clear: we must scrap net zero now. Net zero is making Australia weaker, not stronger. It is making energy dearer, industry less competitive and our country more exposed. It punishes every sector that keeps Australia running, while forcing us towards unreliable systems and imported food—everything. And it leaves us completely dependent on other countries. That is not a responsible way to run a country. That is an act of national self-harm.”

    Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

7 speakers · 6 support · 1 unclear

  1. Zali Steggall Steggall supports the bill as a necessary short-term response to the fuel supply crisis, but says its powers need stronger time limits and an earlier review and must be paired with faster transport electrification to reduce Australia's dependence on imported oil.
    “The central idea in this legislation is sound, and I will support it to address a temporary emergency situation. It gives Export Finance Australia a flexible set of tools—insurance, derivatives, loans and other arrangements—to derisk additional cargoes to encourage suppliers to bid for discretionary shipments. But these laws need guardrails to ensure these powers are temporary and not used to finance fossil fuels for any longer than would address the immediate fuel security crisis. To that end, I would urge the government to consider a much earlier period of review for this legislation.”

    Independent • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Monique Ryan Ryan supports the emergency fuel-supply measures but criticises the bill as rushed, poorly scrutinised and financially risky.
    “This morning, the government introduced this emergency legislation aimed at ensuring Australia's continued fuel supply during the ongoing war in the Middle East. I support emergency measures around fuel supply, especially where Australia's reserves sit well below the International Energy Agency's 90-day mandate and are, in fact, amongst the lowest in the OECD.”

    Independent • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Kate Chaney Kate Chaney will support the bill as a rapid response to fuel supply pressures, but warns that its broad, permanent powers require transparency, meaningful oversight and contracts that protect taxpayers and share any financial upside.
    “As I understand it, this bill was originally conceived to establish a strategic reserve for critical minerals. But, in response to the unfolding international crisis, the government has hastily redrafted it, expanding the scope of Export Finance Australia's powers so that it can enter into and support transactions to shore up fuel and other strategic supplies. When supply chains are under stress and prices are spiking, Australians expect the government to act. For that reason, I will support this bill to enable the government to respond quickly to the current crisis. But this bill also asks parliament to place a great deal of trust in the executive, trust in the breadth of the powers being granted, trust in a new and expanded role for EFA and trust that taxpayers will be adequately protected when public money is used to underwrite private risk, and it's those issues that I want to focus on today. But, first, let's look at what the bill actually does.”

    Independent • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Rebekha Sharkie Sharkie supports the bill's powers to finance and stockpile essential fuel, saying they will help Australia manage the current crisis and reduce future supply risks.
    “The Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026 provides new powers to do, I think, two very important things—(1) finance the import of fuel and other necessary goods and (2) provide financial derivatives and price point support to purchase, sell and stockpile fuel and other necessary goods to ensure domestic availability only on government direction and to manage exposures as appropriate, providing flexibility to deal with the current fuel crisis now and to stabilise supply and avoid escalation and destabilisation in the future. It will help the government to manage Australia's exposure to risk around acquisition and delivery of fuel in the unpredictable and destabilised global environment that we're currently in. I would like to thank Mr Farrell for the very early morning detailed briefing on this legislation.”

    Centre Alliance • MP • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Tammy Tyrrell Tyrrell supports the bill because its strategic reserves would help Australia withstand fuel and critical-mineral supply disruptions.
    “Straight up, I'll be supporting the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026, which will create strategic reserves for fuel and critical minerals and give the government the ability to better respond to future disruptions to supply chains.”

    Independent • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. David Pocock David Pocock supports the bill as a reasonable response to fuel supply disruptions, but wants stronger safeguards, greater transparency and an earlier review of its broad executive powers.
    “But support for action is not the same as support for unchecked power. While I support the bill, like Senator Tyrrell I have concerns about the breadth of the powers it creates and the need for greater transparency in how these powers are used. When parliament extends broad authority to the executive, and when public money is used to underwrite private risk, Australians deserve to know how decisions are being made and how their interests are being protected.”

    Independent • Senator • 31 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat