Aviation Consumer Protection

Current status

This bill is currently before Parliament.

Policy area

Transport & communications

What does this bill do?

Air passengers would get minimum service standards covering delays, cancellations, baggage, disability access and the care of children.

Why was it introduced?

The government said the Airline Customer Advocate, the industry-run complaint service, had not become effective or trusted. For the year ending 31 December 2025, domestic flights arrived on time 76.9 per cent of the time and departed on time 77.7 per cent of the time. Cancellations were 2.5 per cent, above the long-term rate of 2.2 per cent, and the government committed $3.6 million to strengthen consumer protection.

Broader context

Australia already relied heavily on air travel, but the industry-led Airline Customer Advocate had not provided an effective or trusted complaints path as complaints rose and delays and cancellations remained above long-term expectations. After the government committed to reform in its 2024 aviation white paper, consultation and visible passenger disruption helped drive the Aviation Consumer Protection Bill 2026, introduced by Catherine King MP, to create enforceable minimum standards, an independent ombuds scheme and a regulator, with the House later passing the bill.

Key criticism

Monique Ryan (Independent) argued that passengers would receive no automatic, fixed compensation and that Parliament had not seen the proposed service standards. She also warned that exemptions and limited coverage of booking agents and shared-airline bookings could leave gaps. Michael McCormack (National Party) argued that unknown costs could hurt regional airlines and airports. He said excluding Airservices Australia, the government body that manages air traffic, left passengers unprotected when air-traffic-control failures caused disruption.

Who supported it?

Catherine King MP introduced this bill. Supportive speeches so far have come from Labor.

Introduced in House 01 Apr 2026
Passed House 29 June 2026
At second reading in Senate 30 June 2026
Not yet law

Did it become law?

Not yet

Final passage

Recorded vote so far

1 recorded amendment or procedural vote was found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Days since introduction

128 days

Updated 07 Aug 2026.

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Air passengers would get minimum service standards covering delays, cancellations, baggage, disability access and the care of children.

  2. Passengers with unresolved complaints could use the Aviation Consumer OmbudspersonAn independent service for resolving passenger complaints., an independent complaint service, without paying a fee.

  3. Passengers could receive decisions that bind airlines and airports but do not bind the passenger.

  4. Airlines and covered airports would have to join the complaint scheme. Failing to join could bring a penalty of 1,500 penalty units.

  5. Airlines and covered airports that break the standards could face court penalties. A company’s maximum could reach 30,300 penalty units or more.

  6. People affected by aircraft noise could seek independent reviews of complaint handling, community consultation and public information.

  7. Travellers could see published information about why flights were delayed, cancelled or disrupted, once detailed rules are made.

Show source excerpts
  1. 20 The Aviation Consumer Protections Charter (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument (the Aviation Consumer Protections Charter), determine the requirements in relation to the offering or supply of regulated services, for the purposes of any of the following: (a) protecting the consumers of regulated services; (b) preventing discrimination against a person, on the ground of a disability of the person, in relation to transportation of that person or another person by aircraft; (c) addressing concerns about the rights, protection or care of children. (2) The Minister may, by legisla
    Aviation Consumer Protection introduced text
  2. 23 Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme (1) The Minister may, by notifiable instrument, authorise an external dispute resolution scheme to resolve eligible complaints, if the Minister is satisfied that the mandatory requirements under section 24 will be met. Note: Once the authorisation of an external dispute resolution scheme comes into force, the scheme is known as the Aviation Consumer Ombuds Scheme and the operator is known as the Aviation Consumer Ombudsperson: see the definitions of Aviation Consumer Ombudsperson and Aviation Consumer Ombuds Scheme in section 10
    Aviation Consumer Protection introduced text
  3. Operational requirements (4) The operational requirements are that: (a) only eligible complaints can be dealt with under the scheme; and (b) all eligible complaints made under the scheme are dealt with under the scheme by the operator, except in circumstances set out in the scheme where the operator may decide not to deal, or not to continue to deal, with the complaint; and (c) the complaints mechanism under the scheme is appropriately accessible to persons dissatisfied with scheme members; and (d) complaints against scheme members are resolved (including by making determinations relating
    Aviation Consumer Protection introduced text
  4. 33 Requirement to join scheme (1) Each regulated entity must join the Aviation Consumer Ombuds Scheme by becoming a member of the company that is the Aviation Consumer Ombudsperson. Note: A regulated entity may be exempted under section 9 from the application of certain provisions of this Act, potentially including this section, for a specified period. Civil penalty (2) A person contravenes this subsection if: (a) the person is required under subsection (1) to join the Aviation Consumer Ombuds Scheme; and (b) the person fails to do so.
    Aviation Consumer Protection introduced text
  5. 19 Compliance with Charter requirements and Standards (1) A regulated entity must comply with: (a) the Charter requirements that apply to the regulated entity; and (b) the Standards that apply to the regulated entity. (2) Subsection (1) is a civil penalty provision. (3) To avoid doubt, a regulated entity complies with the Charter requirements and the Standards if the regulated entity meets or exceeds those requirements and Standards. Pecuniary penalties for failure to comply (4) If the Federal Court is satisfied that a regulated entity has contravened subsection (1), the Court may order
    Aviation Consumer Protection introduced text
  6. 55 Aircraft Noise Ombudsperson (1) The Secretary must, by writing, designate a position in the Department as the position of Aircraft Noise Ombudsperson. Note: For creation of positions, see section 77 of the Public Service Act 1999. (2) The position must only be occupied by an SES employee in the Department. (3) The Aircraft Noise Ombudsperson is: (a) the SES employee who occupies the position; or (b) the SES employee or acting SES employee who is acting in the position. Note: The expressions SES employee and acting SES employee are defined in section 2B of the Acts Interpretation Act
    Aviation Consumer Protection introduced text
  7. 81 Publication of information (1) This section applies to the following persons and entities (each an information holder): (a) the Minister; (b) the Secretary; (c) the Department; (d) the Aviation Consumer Ombudsperson; (e) the Aircraft Noise Ombudsperson; (f) a regulated entity; (g) an aircraft noise management agency; (h) any other person prescribed by rules made for the purposes of this paragraph. Rules about publication of information (2) The rules may make provision in relation to publishing information held by, or under the control of, an information holder that is about or in
    Aviation Consumer Protection introduced text

Broader context for this bill

Australia already relied heavily on air travel, but the industry-led Airline Customer Advocate had not provided an effective or trusted complaints path as complaints rose and delays and cancellations remained above long-term expectations. After the government committed to reform in its 2024 aviation white paper, consultation and visible passenger disruption helped drive the Aviation Consumer Protection Bill 2026, introduced by Catherine King MP, to create enforceable minimum standards, an independent ombuds scheme and a regulator, with the House later passing the bill.

  1. 2024

    Government commits to aviation consumer reforms

    The government's 2024 aviation white paper committed to a new aviation consumer protection framework covering passenger standards, complaints and enforcement.

    Hansard ↗
  2. 08 Sept 2025

    Government publishes aviation consumer protection consultation paper

    The consultation paper set out proposed reforms after years of relying on industry-led arrangements to address passenger complaints and disruptions.

    Department of Infrastructure ↗
  3. 01 Apr 2026

    Catherine King MP introduces the bill

    Catherine King MP introduced the bill in the House of Representatives to begin legislating enforceable aviation consumer protections.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  4. 16 May 2026

    Flight cancellations highlight passenger-rights gaps

    The federal budget allocated nearly $40 million for an overhaul of airline passenger rights, including a watchdog and complaints system that could address disrupted travellers' problems.

    ABC News ↗
  5. 29 June 2026

    House passes the bill

    The House of Representatives agreed to the bill at third reading, completing its passage through the originating chamber.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 01 Apr 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 01 Apr 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport review 01 Apr 2026

Referred to Committee (01/04/2026): Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee; Committee report (19/06/2026)

Report tabled 19 Jun 2026

APH bill page notes
Scrutiny of Bills review 06 May 2026

Considered by scrutiny committee (06/05/2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 6 of 2026

Scrutiny Digest 6 of 2026

APH bill page notes
Second reading debate 25 June 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate 29 June 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

House second reading agreed 29 June 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House third reading agreed 29 June 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 30 June 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 30 June 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

The main case against this bill

Monique Ryan (Independent) argued that passengers would receive no automatic, fixed compensation and that Parliament had not seen the proposed service standards. She also warned that exemptions and limited coverage of booking agents and shared-airline bookings could leave gaps. Michael McCormack (National Party) argued that unknown costs could hurt regional airlines and airports. He said excluding Airservices Australia, the government body that manages air traffic, left passengers unprotected when air-traffic-control failures caused disruption.

Ryan acknowledged that an independent complaint service with binding decisions and a new enforcement body were genuine improvements. The government said the framework was designed to resolve individual complaints while detecting wider industry problems.

No guaranteed automatic compensation

The bill was criticised for not legislating automatic compensation for airline-controlled delays and cancellations, leaving uncertainty about whether passengers would receive direct financial redress.

Raised by Monique Ryan, Michael McCormack and Sam Birrell Source ↗

Regional services could face higher costs

Critics warned that compliance costs could threaten regional routes or lead to weaker protections for regional passengers, particularly without a published impact analysis and clear exemptions.

Raised by Sam Birrell, Michael McCormack and Helen Haines Source ↗

Key protections remained unsettled

The framework left important standards to a ministerial charter that was still being developed, prompting concern about missing implementation details, flight-credit protection and whether Airservices Australia should be covered.

Raised by Helen Haines and Michael McCormack Source ↗

Recorded votes

Amendments at a glance

Recorded amendment and procedural votes grouped by chamber. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.

House

Defeated

Require automatic compensation and publish passenger standards

Aye 47 No 86

Defeated 47 to 86. Support came from Liberal, Nationals, Greens, and Community Strong Australia. Opposition came from Labor. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

29 June 2026

The 47–86 defeat meant the second-reading motion moved on without these demands being added.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 85
Liberal 25 / 0
Nationals 12 / 0
Independent 7 / 1
Greens 1 / 0
Community Strong Australia 1 / 0
One Nation 1 / 0

These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Catherine King

Australian Labor Party • MP 01 Apr 2026

King supports the bill as a major reform to improve passenger protections and hold airlines and airports accountable through enforceable standards, an independent ombudsperson and a government regulator.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead opposing voice Opposes

Sam Birrell

National Party • MP 25 June 2026

Birrell opposes the bill, arguing that it creates bureaucracy without direct passenger compensation or evidence that it will reduce delays and cancellations, while potentially imposing costs that threaten regional air services.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Michael McCormack

National Party • MP 25 June 2026

McCormack says the coalition will allow the bill to pass its second reading but will seek Senate amendments, arguing that it lacks direct compensation, leaves regional aviation exposed to excessive costs and fails to protect flight credits or cover Airservices Australia.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Mixed

Monique Ryan

Independent • MP 25 June 2026

Ryan says the bill improves aviation consumer protection but should not proceed unchanged, demanding a legislated passenger rights charter and automatic compensation for airline-controlled delays and cancellations.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

8 speakers · 7 support · 1 unclear

  1. Sarah Witty Sarah Witty supports the bill because it creates enforceable passenger standards, an independent complaints process and clearer rights to refunds and assistance when flights are disrupted.
    “This bill is not pretending every flight will run on time. It is not pretending every disruption can be avoided, and it is not pretending aviation can be simplified by legislation alone, but it does something important. It puts consumers back at the centre, it says trust has to be earned, it says accountability cannot be voluntary, it says passengers deserve better than confusion, delay and silence. This is practical Labor reform. It takes a system that was too unclear, too weak and too frustrating, and starts to build something stronger in its place—a system where standards are clear, complaints are heard fairly, industry is accountable and people are treated with dignity when plans fall apart. That is the kind of reform Australia expects from this parliament, and it is the kind of reform the Albanese Labor government is delivering. I am proud to support this bill, I am proud to support stronger protections for Australian travellers, and I commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Ash Ambihaipahar Ash Ambihaipahar supports the bill because it establishes enforceable minimum standards, dedicated oversight and independent dispute resolution for airline passengers, giving travellers clearer rights and fairer treatment when flights are disrupted.
    “I rise in support of the Aviation Consumer Protection Bill 2026 and the other bills itemised. These bills together represent the most significant reform to aviation consumer rights here in this country in more than a decade. For too long, Australian travellers have felt powerless when flights are being delayed, cancelled or disrupted. For too long, people have been left stranded at airports, unable to get clear information, unable to access assistance and unable to resolve complaints in a fair and timely way. For too long, this system has effectively relied on airlines policing themselves. But Australians deserve better, and the Albanese Labor government is delivering a modern aviation system that puts passengers back in the centre of this conversation—a system that is fairer, a system that is much more transparent and a system that improves accountability across the aviation industry and, more importantly, a system that recognises that air travel is not a luxury for many Australians. It's an essential part of everyday life.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Jenny McAllister McAllister supports the bill as a major reform that will improve passenger protections and hold airlines and airports accountable through enforceable standards, independent dispute resolution and regulatory oversight.
    “This Bill will improve outcomes for consumers and ensure the aviation sector is accountable for the services they offer and is focussed on aviation consumers.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 30 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Tom French Tom French supports the bill because it will give air travellers clearer rights, independent dispute resolution and stronger oversight when airlines or airports fail them, while allowing proportionate exemptions for smaller operators.
    “I rise to speak in support of the Aviation Consumer Protection Bill 2026 and the related bills. At its heart, this package is about a simple standard. Australians who pay for air travel should be treated fairly, told clearly what is happening and given a proper pathway when things go wrong. That should not be controversial. In a country like Australia, aviation is not just another service; it is part of how our nation functions.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Jo Briskey Briskey supports the bill because it creates enforceable passenger rights, independent complaint bodies and compensation for disruptions, including cash refunds and reimbursement of related expenses.
    “I look forward to going back to my community and telling them that the next time they travel after saving for that well-earned holiday or to care for a sick parent a disruption or a cancellation will mean compensation, not frustration. That's one less thing they'll need to worry about when weighing up their budget. This legislation will mean fewer Marias sitting at an airport gate frustrated, fewer families absorbing costs that should have been the airline's and fewer residents feeling like their concerns about aircraft noise have vanished into a bureaucratic void. It will mean Australia finally has an aviation consumer protection framework that reflects our modern, fair-minded country—one that stands with every passenger and brings real accountability to a crucial industry. I'm proud to be part of a government delivering it, because my community relies on the success of our aviation industry, and that industry relies on my community and on the many others who pass through it every day. I commend the bills to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Ali France Ali France strongly supports the bill, saying it will give travellers clear rights, free independent complaint resolution and stronger enforcement, while also creating an independent ombudsperson for communities affected by aircraft noise.
    “Recently we saw exactly how badly this can go. The conflict in the Middle East has caused major disruptions to flights and to fuel and real uncertainty for Australian travellers. We've seen passengers unsure of what to do next and unsure of what they are even entitled to do when a flight is cancelled. Our airlines have done a great deal of difficult work to get Aussies home safely during that conflict, and that work is appreciated. But this moment has outlined something important: Australians who rely on aviation deserve clear protections and a clear understanding of their rights, especially when the unexpected happens. That is what this bill delivers. It is the most significant reform to aviation consumer protection this country has seen, and it flows directly from our aviation white paper—our plan to protect passengers while keeping our aviation sector competitive and while keeping our proud safety record intact.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Carina Garland Garland's position on the bill is unclear because the supplied text only records procedural amendments to the second reading question and contains no substantive view on whether the bill should pass.
    “The original question was that this bill be now read a second time. To this the honourable member for Riverina moved as an amendment that all words after 'That' be omitted with a view to substituting other words. The honourable member for Kooyong has now moved as an amendment to that amendment that all words after 'notes that' be omitted with a view to substituting other words. The question now is that the amendment moved by the honourable member for Kooyong to the amendment moved by the honourable member for Riverina be agreed to.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

2 speakers · 1 support · 1 oppose

Minor parties and independents

2 speakers · 1 mixed · 1 unclear

  1. Helen Haines Helen Haines welcomes the bill's stronger protections for airline passengers but raises serious concerns about missing implementation details, the lack of impact analysis and the risk that regional travellers will receive weaker protections.
    “I welcome stronger consumer protections in the aviation sector. They're overdue. They're sorely needed. However, I am concerned about a lack of detail on exactly how the proposed framework will operate. While exemptions for small council-owned airports are truly welcome, I'm concerned about whether this could have unintended, negative impacts for regional consumers. There's a reason regional Australians have a sceptical view. In regional Australia we're too often the last to receive and the first to lose. Not too long ago Qantas announced the discontinuation of its Albury-Melbourne route. This announcement came as a shock to the community and has real implications for medical specialists who travel to and from Albury-Wodonga to provide crucial healthcare services that are otherwise completely unavailable in our regional community.”

    Independent • MP • 25 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat