Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System)

Current status

This bill became law on Jun 30th, 2026.

Policy area

Budget, tax & economy

What does this bill do?

People making small charitable donations can claim a tax deduction even when the gift is under $2.

Why was it introduced?

The government said the changes would support charitable giving, make trust reporting simpler and stop public money subsidising gambling and tobacco research that can worsen addiction or health risks. Its goal is to double charitable giving by 2030, while round-up donations have made gifts below $2 increasingly common. It said the Medicare levyA tax that helps fund Medicare. changes would protect more than one million lower-income earners in 2025–26. The thresholds rise by 2.9%, including the family amount from $45,907 to $47,238 and the seniors and pensioners amount from $43,020 to $44,268.

Broader context

Australia already had a $2 minimum for claiming deductions on gifts to deductible gift recipients, while trust reporting systems and trustee arrangements could create practical compliance or capacity problems. After the government committed to modernise tax administration and double philanthropic giving by 2030, and debate recorded $31.5 billion in gambling losses in 2022–23, the bill removed the outdated donation threshold, streamlined reporting, widened trustee options, changed Medicare and pension settings, excluded harmful gambling and tobacco R&D from incentives, and became law on 30 June 2026.

Key criticism

Monique Ryan (Independent) argued the gambling and tobacco exclusion did not go far enough because companies could still claim the tax break for research labelled as reducing harm. She also criticised the government for not acting on the Murphy report — a parliamentary inquiry into online gambling harm — including its proposed ban on online gambling advertising. Rebekha Sharkie (Centre Alliance) similarly argued that all gambling and tobacco businesses, and research bodies funded by them, should be excluded. She said 18 gambling-industry companies had claimed more than $100 million in eligible research spending in 2022–23.

Who supported it?

Hon Dr Daniel Mulino MP introduced this bill. In the latest recorded vote on the bill in the Senate, support came from Labor, Greens, Liberal, some crossbench members; opposition came from One Nation, UAP.

Introduced in House 25 Mar 2026
Passed House 02 June 2026
Passed Senate 29 June 2026
Became law 30 June 2026

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 30 June 2026

Final passage

No counted final vote

2 recorded votes on the bill were found earlier in passage, but the final chamber agreement was not a counted division.

Passage speed

97 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. People making small charitable donations can claim a tax deduction even when the gift is under $2. This covers gifts made from 1 July 2024.

  2. Trustees of closely held trusts must include a beneficiary’s tax file numberA personal number used by the tax office. in the trust’s annual tax return. This starts with trust years beginning from 1 July 2026.

  3. People whose affairs are managed by a Public TrusteeA government body that can manage someone’s affairs. can have an approved, qualified person manage their self-managed super fundA retirement fund managed by its members.. The Act also corrects drafting errors in Treasury laws.

  4. Businesses researching gambling, tobacco, vaping or human-use nicotine lose access to the research and development tax break from 1 July 2025. Research solely aimed at reducing harm remains eligible.

  5. Lower-income singles can earn more before paying the Medicare levyA tax that helps fund Medicare., with the main threshold rising from $27,222 to $28,011.

  6. Lower-income families, seniors and pensioners receive higher Medicare levyA tax that helps fund Medicare. thresholds. The family threshold rises from $45,907 to $47,238.

  7. Pensioners travelling temporarily overseas keep their pension supplementAn extra payment for certain living costs. for 12 weeks, up from six weeks. It then stops, and people living overseas no longer receive it.

Show source excerpts
  1. 1 Section 30‑15 (table item 1, column headed “Special conditions”, paragraph (b)) Repeal the paragraph. 2 Section 30‑15 (table item 2, column headed “Special conditions”, paragraph (a)) Repeal the paragraph. 3 Section 30‑15 (table item 4, column headed “Special conditions”, paragraph (b)) Repeal the paragraph. 4 Section 30‑15 (table item 6, column headed “Special conditions”, paragraph (b)) Repeal the paragraph. 5 Section 30‑15 (table item 7, column headed “Special conditions”, paragraph (d)) Repeal the paragraph, substitute:  instead of making the contribution you had made a gift o
    Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text
  2. 202DP Trustee must report quoted tax file number (1) The trustee must report the beneficiary’s tax file number to the Commissioner, in the approved form, if: (a) the beneficiary is presently entitled, for the purposes of Division 6 of Part III, to a share of the income of the trust in respect of a year of income; and (b) the beneficiary has quoted the beneficiary’s tax file number to the trustee at any time before the trustee gives the Commissioner the trust’s return of income for the year; and (c) the trustee has not reported the beneficiary’s tax file number to the Commissioner under Div
    Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text
  3. Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 2 After paragraph 17A(3)(a) (aa) all of the following apply: (i) a member of the fund has died; (ii) the legal personal representative of the member is the Public Trustee of a State or Territory; (iii) an individual is, in place of the member, a trustee of the fund, or a director of the body corporate that is the trustee of the fund, during the period described in subparagraphs (a)(i) and (ii); (iv) the individual is approved, in writing, by the Public Trustee to be the trustee or director (as the case may be); (v) the individual is appropr
    Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text
  4. 3 At the end of subsection 355‑25(2) ; (i) an activity that relates to any of the following, unless the activity is covered by subsection (3) (harm minimisation purpose): (i) a gambling service (within the meaning of the Interactive Gambling Act 2001); (ii) gambling; (iii) a gambling‑like practice; (j) an activity that relates to any of the following, unless the activity is covered by subsection (4) (harm minimisation purpose): (i) tobacco (see subsections (5) and (6)); (ii) a tobacco product (as defined in section 9 of the Public Health (Tobacco and Other Products) Act 2023); (iii) a
    Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text
  5. A New Tax System (Medicare Levy Surcharge—Fringe Benefits) Act 1999 1 Paragraphs 15(1)(c) and 16(2)(c) Omit “$27,222”, substitute “$28,011”. Medicare Levy Act 1986 2 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of phase‑in limit) Omit “$53,775”, substitute “$55,335”. 3 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (c) of the definition of phase‑in limit) Omit “$34,027”, substitute “$35,013”. 4 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of threshold amount) Omit “$43,020”, substitute “$44,268”. 5 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (c) of the definition of threshold amount) Omit “$27,222”, substitute
    Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text
  6. 6 Subsection 8(5) (definition of family income threshold) Omit “$45,907”, substitute “$47,238”. 7 Subsection 8(5) (definition of family income threshold) Omit “$4,216”, substitute “$4,338”. 8 Subsections 8(6) and (7) Omit “$45,907”, substitute “$47,238”. 9 Subsection 8(7) Omit “$59,886”, substitute “$61,623”.
    Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text
  7. 3 Points 1064‑BA1 and 1064‑BA2 Repeal the points, substitute: Pension supplement 1064‑BA1 A pension supplement amount is to be added to the person’s maximum basic rate if the person is residing in Australia and: (a) is in Australia; or (b) is temporarily absent from Australia and has been so for a continuous period not exceeding 12 weeks.
    Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text

Broader context for this bill

Australia already had a $2 minimum for claiming deductions on gifts to deductible gift recipients, while trust reporting systems and trustee arrangements could create practical compliance or capacity problems. After the government committed to modernise tax administration and double philanthropic giving by 2030, and debate recorded $31.5 billion in gambling losses in 2022–23, the bill removed the outdated donation threshold, streamlined reporting, widened trustee options, changed Medicare and pension settings, excluded harmful gambling and tobacco R&D from incentives, and became law on 30 June 2026.

  1. March 2022

    Tax administration modernisation is first announced

    The ATO says the modernisation program builds on changes first announced in the March 2022 Budget, including work later affecting trustees and beneficiaries.

    Australian Taxation Office ↗
  2. 2022–23

    Australians lose $31.5 billion to gambling

    The figure was cited in parliamentary debate alongside arguments that taxpayer-funded R&D incentives should not support harmful gambling and tobacco activities.

    Hansard ↗
  3. 18 Dec 2024

    Government commits to double philanthropic giving by 2030

    At the 2024–25 Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook, the government announced further reforms to support its commitment to double philanthropic giving by 2030.

    Australian Taxation Office ↗
  4. 25 Mar 2026

    Hon Dr Daniel Mulino MP introduces the bill

    He presented a package responding to outdated donation rules, tax-administration friction and gaps affecting trustees, while also changing R&D, Medicare levyA tax that helps fund Medicare. and pension settings.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  5. 29 June 2026

    Parliament passes the bill

    Both Houses passed the bill in the same form, allowing its tax, superannuation and pension changes to proceed to Royal Assent.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  6. 30 June 2026

    Royal Assent turns the bill into an Act

    The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act and completing the parliamentary process.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 25 Mar 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 25 Mar 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 01 Apr 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Sent to Federation Chamber for debate 01 Apr 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Referred to Federation Chamber

Federation Chamber debate 01 Apr 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate

Economics review 01 Apr 2026

Referred to Committee (01/04/2026): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (30/04/2026)

Report tabled 30 Apr 2026

APH bill page notes
Returned to House for further consideration 26 May 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate 28 May 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

House second reading agreed 28 May 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House agreed to amendment packages 02 June 2026

The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.

Consideration in detail debate

House third reading agreed 02 June 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 22 June 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 22 June 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 29 June 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate second reading agreed 29 June 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Senate third reading agreed 29 June 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Passed both houses 29 June 2026

Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.

Finally passed both Houses

Assent 30 June 2026

The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.

The main case against this bill

Monique Ryan (Independent) argued the gambling and tobacco exclusion did not go far enough because companies could still claim the tax break for research labelled as reducing harm. She also criticised the government for not acting on the Murphy report — a parliamentary inquiry into online gambling harm — including its proposed ban on online gambling advertising. Rebekha Sharkie (Centre Alliance) similarly argued that all gambling and tobacco businesses, and research bodies funded by them, should be excluded. She said 18 gambling-industry companies had claimed more than $100 million in eligible research spending in 2022–23.

Both speakers supported the bill overall. The government said the exception was deliberately narrow and preserved only research conducted solely to reduce harm, such as helping people stop an addiction.

Capital gains tax impact

The bill’s capital gains tax changes were said to threaten farmers and middle-income Australians, including by altering concessions for assets transferred through inheritance or relationship breakdown.

Raised by Michael McCormack and senators proposing amendments to preserve existing tax treatment Source ↗

Safeguards for vulnerable super members

A defeated amendment sought duties, safeguards, reviews and penalties for trustees or directors managing a self-managed super fundA retirement fund managed by its members. for someone unable to manage their own affairs, indicating concern that the bill’s protections were insufficient.

Raised by Senator Lidia Thorpe Source ↗

Harm-reduction research exception

Some members argued that allowing gambling, tobacco and vaping research to retain tax support when labelled harm minimisation could leave a loophole for industries whose products cause harm.

Raised by Monique Ryan, Rebekha Sharkie and senators supporting sheet 3764 Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

02 June 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

29 June 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Carried

Keep the overseas pension supplement changes

Aye 36 No 10

Passed 36 to 10. Support came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Greens.

29 June 2026

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 22 / 0
Greens 0 / 10
Liberal 6 / 0
One Nation 4 / 0
Nationals 2 / 0
Independent 1 / 0
UAP 1 / 0
Carried

Keep gambling and tobacco research exclusions

Aye 36 No 5

Passed 36 to 5. Support came from Labor, Greens, Liberal, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from One Nation and UAP.

29 June 2026

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 22 / 0
Greens 10 / 0
One Nation 0 / 4
Liberal 3 / 0
Independent 1 / 0
UAP 0 / 1

Amendments at a glance

Amendments grouped by chamber. Where APH reports aggregate counts, the package card summarizes the matching public amendment sheets by source theme.

House

Carried

Government package: 5 amendments

Government amendments increase Medicare levy low-income, family income and phase-in thresholds, and allow eligible pensioners to retain the pension supplement during temporary absences from Australia of up to 12 weeks.

02 June 2026

Passed on the voices

The chamber agreed to this amendment package without a counted vote. APH records the agreed count by amendment, while the source documents are grouped into amendment sheets.

Themes in the public amendment sheets

Senate

Defeated

Completely exclude gambling and tobacco industries

Aye 11 No 34

Defeated 11 to 34. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, and Nationals.

29 June 2026

The Senate rejected the statement by 11 votes to 34, then agreed to the bill's second reading.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 22
Greens 10 / 0
Liberal 0 / 5
One Nation 0 / 4
Nationals 0 / 2
Independent 1 / 0
UAP 0 / 1
Defeated

Keep tax concessions for inherited or transferred assets

Aye 25 No 32

Defeated 25 to 32. Support came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, Liberal Party, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens.

29 June 2026

The Senate rejected the changes by 25 votes to 32, so the proposed protections for these transferred assets were not added to the bill.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 22
Liberal 15 / 0
Greens 0 / 10
One Nation 4 / 0
Nationals 3 / 0
Independent 1 / 0
Liberal Party 1 / 0
UAP 1 / 0
Defeated

Remove the harm-reduction research exception

Aye 11 No 34

Defeated 11 to 34. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, and Nationals.

29 June 2026

The Senate rejected the changes by 11 votes to 34, leaving the bill's harm-minimisation exceptions intact.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 22
Greens 10 / 0
Liberal 0 / 5
One Nation 0 / 4
Nationals 0 / 2
Independent 1 / 0
UAP 0 / 1
Defeated

Add duties for substitute super-fund trustees

The Senate rejected the amendment on the voices, so no vote counts were recorded.

Defeated on voices

The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.

This list includes amendment votes, procedural votes and votes on the bill itself.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Daniel Mulino

Australian Labor Party • MP 25 Mar 2026

Mulino urges passage of the bill, saying it will encourage charitable giving, modernise tax administration, maintain Treasury laws and stop tax incentives subsidising gambling and tobacco research except where solely intended to minimise harm.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead opposing voice Opposes

Michael McCormack

National Party • MP 28 May 2026

Michael McCormack opposes the bill in its current form, arguing that its capital gains tax changes breach election promises and will hurt farmers and middle Australia, while calling for proper Senate committee scrutiny.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Rebekha Sharkie

Centre Alliance • MP 01 Apr 2026

Sharkie supports the bill as a good start, but wants it strengthened to deny research and development tax incentives to all gambling and tobacco activities because taxpayers should not subsidise industries that cause substantial harm.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

Monique Ryan

Independent • MP 01 Apr 2026

Ryan supports the bill's removal of research and development tax incentives for gambling and nicotine-related activities, but argues the harm-reduction exemption should also be removed and urges broader action against gambling advertising and industry influence.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

9 speakers · 10 contributions · 9 support

  1. Tim Ayres Ayres supports the bill's passage by moving that it be read a second time, but the supplied text contains no substantive explanation of its measures.
    “That these bills be now read a second time.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 22 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Renee Coffey Coffey supports the bill because it modernises tax administration, makes small charitable donations easier to deduct and directs research and development incentives away from gambling and tobacco activities.
    “Schedule 1 of this bill is a clear example of practical support for the charity and not-for-profit sector. It removes the requirement that a gift to a deductible gift recipient must be valued at $2 or more before a taxpayer can claim a deduction. That threshold has been in place since 1927, reflecting a very different era, when issuing receipts and keeping records was a manual process and the mechanics of giving looked nothing like they do today. That world has changed, and these changes enable our laws to catch up with that reality. They treat donations equally regardless of size, support innovation in fundraising and remove a threshold that no longer reflects how Australians contribute.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 01 Apr 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Matt Thistlethwaite Thistlethwaite supports the bill because it provides practical relief by protecting low-income earners from higher Medicare levyA tax that helps fund Medicare. costs and allowing pensioners to retain their supplement for longer during temporary overseas travel.
    “This particular bill also ensures that there's relief for people in the budget, particularly those that are paying the Medicare levy at lower rates of income. Schedule 5 of this bill increases the Medicare levy for low-income thresholds for singles, families, seniors and pensioners to 2.9 per cent, in line with recent movements in the consumer price index. This ensures that low-income households continue to be exempt from paying the Medicare levy or pay it at a reduced rate if their incomes have increased, in line with or less than inflation. It's a simple, fair adjustment that protects those who can least afford additional costs. Successive governments have increased these thresholds in line with CPI since 1997, and it's a longstanding practice that ensures that the Medicare levy remains progressive and equitable. More than a million low-income earners are expected to benefit from these increases in 2025-26. It's a practical example of how we're easing pressure on household budgets while maintaining the integrity of our healthcare system.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 28 May 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Julie-Ann Campbell Campbell supports the bill as an important measure that protects low-income earners from higher Medicare levies and gives pensioners travelling overseas greater flexibility, while better targeting the pension supplementAn extra payment for certain living costs. for people living abroad long term.
    “Schedule 5 of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026 implements an increase to the Medicare levy low-income thresholds. This amends the Medicare Levy Act 1986 and the A New Tax System (Medicare Levy Surcharge—Fringe Benefits) Act 1999. It will increase the thresholds for singles, families, seniors and pensioners by 2.9 per cent, in line with recent movements in the consumer price index. These changes will mean that Australians on lower incomes will continue to receive important protections when it comes to the Medicare levy.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 28 May 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Claire Clutterham Clutterham supports the bill as a practical modernisation of the tax system that reduces compliance burdens, encourages small charitable donations and prevents tax incentives subsidising gambling and tobacco research while preserving support for harm-minimisation research.
    “I'm pleased to have shared the nature of schedule 4 to this bill with the chamber. There's a lot going on in this parliament at the moment, and I understand everyone wants to talk about the budget, but the details contained in this bill will have a significantly positive effect on the community. They take away the ability to research gambling and tobacco related activities and place an emphasis on harm minimisation. It is initiatives like this that do deserve to be highlighted and spoken about in this chamber, as they form part of the government's dedicated efforts towards improving harm minimisation. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 28 May 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Jo Briskey Briskey supports the bill, arguing that its practical tax changes will reduce red tape, encourage small charitable donations, maintain clear laws and prevent public subsidies for harmful gambling and tobacco research while preserving incentives for harm-minimisation work.
    “This bill is what good economic management looks like. Labor has never believed that productivity comes from making life harder for working people. It comes from building systems that are fair, straightforward and easy to deal with. When people trust the system and can navigate it more easily, the whole economy works better. We've seen the alternative—the belief in a trickle-down economy—that far too often ends up leaving people to fend for themselves. But for Labor, our economic mission is simple: to build an economy that rewards work, values contribution and leaves no-one behind, an economy that works not just on a spreadsheet but in working people's lives. I commend the bill.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 01 Apr 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Andrew Leigh Leigh supports the bill because removing the $2 threshold will make small and round-up charitable donations tax deductible, simplify giving and help the government encourage philanthropy.
    “The challenge at the moment, though, is that round-up for charity isn't tax deductible, even though, over the course of a year, people may find themselves giving quite a considerable amount to charity. That's the advantage of what the government is doing today. Organisations that consolidate somebody's giving would be able to produce an end-of-year tax-deductible statement which would allow people to claim all of those 19c, 37c and 57c donations they'd made through the course of the year, which might, by the end of the year, add up to hundreds or even thousands of dollars. By encouraging microdonations, we're helping to achieve the government's goal of making it easier to give. My three principles for giving are that we need to have evidence, we need to have enthusiasm and we need to make it easy to donate, and this is one way, alongside simplifying donations through workplace giving and simplifying bequests, that the government is supporting the charity sector. It is a recommendation of the Productivity Commission's Future foundations for giving report that the government remove the $2 threshold for tax-deductible donations to entities with deductible gift recipient status, and this will help form part of the government's response to that report and to the blueprint report.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 01 Apr 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Rowan Holzberger Holzberger supports the bill because it will encourage charitable giving and make the tax system fairer, simpler and more sustainable, including by restricting research and development incentives for harmful industries.
    “This legislation provides practical support to the government's goal of doubling that giving amount by the year 2030. As the member for Griffith talked about, it's those small little round-up donations that end up adding up to a lot of money, so this legislation is going to really supercharge the efforts which are exemplified by people like Charlie and Jenny and Josh and Dan.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 01 Apr 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

4 speakers · 2 support · 1 oppose · 1 unclear

  1. Tim Wilson Wilson says the opposition will not oppose the bill's removal of tax incentives for tobacco and gambling companies, but argues the government is ignoring broader economic pressures on small businesses and the unintended consequences of its tobacco policies.
    “It's wonderful to be speaking on this legislation, which we are not opposing, but I say so in the context that it's always amusing to hear Labor members of parliament get up and speak about the relevance of legislation to their electorate, while they repeat the same talking points that every other Labor member of parliament repeats, but it rarely operates in reality. We just heard about how productivity has been tickety boo under this government, which is why the Treasurer called a crisis conference on productivity and a roundtable to bring together Australia's leading business minds, plus the ACTU, to come up with a solution to the productivity crisis that apparently doesn't exist because productivity is tickety boo.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 01 Apr 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Kevin Hogan Hogan says the coalition will not oppose the bill in the House because many measures are sensible, but will seek a Senate committee inquiry into the proposed exclusion of tobacco and gambling activities from research and development tax incentives, particularly its definitions and broader implications.
    “The coalition is not opposing this bill—the Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026—in this chamber, but in the Senate we are looking to refer it to the economics committee for further scrutiny. The bill contains a range of technical tax measures. Many of the measures are sensible and many of them are non-controversial. The most significant part of this bill is the exclusion of tobacco and gambling activities from the research and development, or R&D, tax incentives. When we look at this measure, we're not necessarily opposed to it but we do want closer scrutiny.”

    National Party • MP • 01 Apr 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Colin Boyce Boyce's personal position is unclear because the supplied text contains only procedural results showing that the House agreed to the second reading.
    “Original question agreed to.”

    Liberal National Party • MP • 28 May 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

2 speakers · 2 support

Full record

Full chat