Capital gains tax impact
The bill’s capital gains tax changes were said to threaten farmers and middle-income Australians, including by altering concessions for assets transferred through inheritance or relationship breakdown.
This bill became law on Jun 30th, 2026.
Budget, tax & economy
People making small charitable donations can claim a tax deduction even when the gift is under $2.
The government said the changes would support charitable giving, make trust reporting simpler and stop public money subsidising gambling and tobacco research that can worsen addiction or health risks. Its goal is to double charitable giving by 2030, while round-up donations have made gifts below $2 increasingly common. It said the Medicare levyA tax that helps fund Medicare. changes would protect more than one million lower-income earners in 2025–26. The thresholds rise by 2.9%, including the family amount from $45,907 to $47,238 and the seniors and pensioners amount from $43,020 to $44,268.
Australia already had a $2 minimum for claiming deductions on gifts to deductible gift recipients, while trust reporting systems and trustee arrangements could create practical compliance or capacity problems. After the government committed to modernise tax administration and double philanthropic giving by 2030, and debate recorded $31.5 billion in gambling losses in 2022–23, the bill removed the outdated donation threshold, streamlined reporting, widened trustee options, changed Medicare and pension settings, excluded harmful gambling and tobacco R&D from incentives, and became law on 30 June 2026.
Monique Ryan (Independent) argued the gambling and tobacco exclusion did not go far enough because companies could still claim the tax break for research labelled as reducing harm. She also criticised the government for not acting on the Murphy report — a parliamentary inquiry into online gambling harm — including its proposed ban on online gambling advertising. Rebekha Sharkie (Centre Alliance) similarly argued that all gambling and tobacco businesses, and research bodies funded by them, should be excluded. She said 18 gambling-industry companies had claimed more than $100 million in eligible research spending in 2022–23.
Hon Dr Daniel Mulino MP introduced this bill. In the latest recorded vote on the bill in the Senate, support came from Labor, Greens, Liberal, some crossbench members; opposition came from One Nation, UAP.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 30 June 2026
Final passage
No counted final vote
2 recorded votes on the bill were found earlier in passage, but the final chamber agreement was not a counted division.
Passage speed
97 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
People making small charitable donations can claim a tax deduction even when the gift is under $2. This covers gifts made from 1 July 2024.
Trustees of closely held trusts must include a beneficiary’s tax file numberA personal number used by the tax office. in the trust’s annual tax return. This starts with trust years beginning from 1 July 2026.
People whose affairs are managed by a Public TrusteeA government body that can manage someone’s affairs. can have an approved, qualified person manage their self-managed super fundA retirement fund managed by its members.. The Act also corrects drafting errors in Treasury laws.
Businesses researching gambling, tobacco, vaping or human-use nicotine lose access to the research and development tax break from 1 July 2025. Research solely aimed at reducing harm remains eligible.
Lower-income singles can earn more before paying the Medicare levyA tax that helps fund Medicare., with the main threshold rising from $27,222 to $28,011.
Lower-income families, seniors and pensioners receive higher Medicare levyA tax that helps fund Medicare. thresholds. The family threshold rises from $45,907 to $47,238.
Pensioners travelling temporarily overseas keep their pension supplementAn extra payment for certain living costs. for 12 weeks, up from six weeks. It then stops, and people living overseas no longer receive it.
1 Section 30‑15 (table item 1, column headed “Special conditions”, paragraph (b)) Repeal the paragraph. 2 Section 30‑15 (table item 2, column headed “Special conditions”, paragraph (a)) Repeal the paragraph. 3 Section 30‑15 (table item 4, column headed “Special conditions”, paragraph (b)) Repeal the paragraph. 4 Section 30‑15 (table item 6, column headed “Special conditions”, paragraph (b)) Repeal the paragraph. 5 Section 30‑15 (table item 7, column headed “Special conditions”, paragraph (d)) Repeal the paragraph, substitute: instead of making the contribution you had made a gift oTreasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text
202DP Trustee must report quoted tax file number (1) The trustee must report the beneficiary’s tax file number to the Commissioner, in the approved form, if: (a) the beneficiary is presently entitled, for the purposes of Division 6 of Part III, to a share of the income of the trust in respect of a year of income; and (b) the beneficiary has quoted the beneficiary’s tax file number to the trustee at any time before the trustee gives the Commissioner the trust’s return of income for the year; and (c) the trustee has not reported the beneficiary’s tax file number to the Commissioner under DivTreasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 2 After paragraph 17A(3)(a) (aa) all of the following apply: (i) a member of the fund has died; (ii) the legal personal representative of the member is the Public Trustee of a State or Territory; (iii) an individual is, in place of the member, a trustee of the fund, or a director of the body corporate that is the trustee of the fund, during the period described in subparagraphs (a)(i) and (ii); (iv) the individual is approved, in writing, by the Public Trustee to be the trustee or director (as the case may be); (v) the individual is approprTreasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text
3 At the end of subsection 355‑25(2) ; (i) an activity that relates to any of the following, unless the activity is covered by subsection (3) (harm minimisation purpose): (i) a gambling service (within the meaning of the Interactive Gambling Act 2001); (ii) gambling; (iii) a gambling‑like practice; (j) an activity that relates to any of the following, unless the activity is covered by subsection (4) (harm minimisation purpose): (i) tobacco (see subsections (5) and (6)); (ii) a tobacco product (as defined in section 9 of the Public Health (Tobacco and Other Products) Act 2023); (iii) aTreasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text
A New Tax System (Medicare Levy Surcharge—Fringe Benefits) Act 1999 1 Paragraphs 15(1)(c) and 16(2)(c) Omit “$27,222”, substitute “$28,011”. Medicare Levy Act 1986 2 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of phase‑in limit) Omit “$53,775”, substitute “$55,335”. 3 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (c) of the definition of phase‑in limit) Omit “$34,027”, substitute “$35,013”. 4 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of threshold amount) Omit “$43,020”, substitute “$44,268”. 5 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (c) of the definition of threshold amount) Omit “$27,222”, substituteTreasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text
6 Subsection 8(5) (definition of family income threshold) Omit “$45,907”, substitute “$47,238”. 7 Subsection 8(5) (definition of family income threshold) Omit “$4,216”, substitute “$4,338”. 8 Subsections 8(6) and (7) Omit “$45,907”, substitute “$47,238”. 9 Subsection 8(7) Omit “$59,886”, substitute “$61,623”.Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text
3 Points 1064‑BA1 and 1064‑BA2 Repeal the points, substitute: Pension supplement 1064‑BA1 A pension supplement amount is to be added to the person’s maximum basic rate if the person is residing in Australia and: (a) is in Australia; or (b) is temporarily absent from Australia and has been so for a continuous period not exceeding 12 weeks.Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) as-passed text
Context
Australia already had a $2 minimum for claiming deductions on gifts to deductible gift recipients, while trust reporting systems and trustee arrangements could create practical compliance or capacity problems. After the government committed to modernise tax administration and double philanthropic giving by 2030, and debate recorded $31.5 billion in gambling losses in 2022–23, the bill removed the outdated donation threshold, streamlined reporting, widened trustee options, changed Medicare and pension settings, excluded harmful gambling and tobacco R&D from incentives, and became law on 30 June 2026.
Tax administration modernisation is first announced
The ATO says the modernisation program builds on changes first announced in the March 2022 Budget, including work later affecting trustees and beneficiaries.
Australian Taxation Office ↗Australians lose $31.5 billion to gambling
The figure was cited in parliamentary debate alongside arguments that taxpayer-funded R&D incentives should not support harmful gambling and tobacco activities.
Hansard ↗Government commits to double philanthropic giving by 2030
At the 2024–25 Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook, the government announced further reforms to support its commitment to double philanthropic giving by 2030.
Australian Taxation Office ↗Hon Dr Daniel Mulino MP introduces the bill
He presented a package responding to outdated donation rules, tax-administration friction and gaps affecting trustees, while also changing R&D, Medicare levyA tax that helps fund Medicare. and pension settings.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both Houses passed the bill in the same form, allowing its tax, superannuation and pension changes to proceed to Royal Assent.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal Assent turns the bill into an Act
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act and completing the parliamentary process.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Second reading debate
Referred to Committee (01/04/2026): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (30/04/2026)
Report tabled 30 Apr 2026
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
Monique Ryan (Independent) argued the gambling and tobacco exclusion did not go far enough because companies could still claim the tax break for research labelled as reducing harm. She also criticised the government for not acting on the Murphy report — a parliamentary inquiry into online gambling harm — including its proposed ban on online gambling advertising. Rebekha Sharkie (Centre Alliance) similarly argued that all gambling and tobacco businesses, and research bodies funded by them, should be excluded. She said 18 gambling-industry companies had claimed more than $100 million in eligible research spending in 2022–23.
Both speakers supported the bill overall. The government said the exception was deliberately narrow and preserved only research conducted solely to reduce harm, such as helping people stop an addiction.
Capital gains tax impact
The bill’s capital gains tax changes were said to threaten farmers and middle-income Australians, including by altering concessions for assets transferred through inheritance or relationship breakdown.
Safeguards for vulnerable super members
A defeated amendment sought duties, safeguards, reviews and penalties for trustees or directors managing a self-managed super fundA retirement fund managed by its members. for someone unable to manage their own affairs, indicating concern that the bill’s protections were insufficient.
Harm-reduction research exception
Some members argued that allowing gambling, tobacco and vaping research to retain tax support when labelled harm minimisation could leave a loophole for industries whose products cause harm.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Passed 36 to 10. Support came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Greens.
Passed 36 to 5. Support came from Labor, Greens, Liberal, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from One Nation and UAP.
Amendments grouped by chamber. Where APH reports aggregate counts, the package card summarizes the matching public amendment sheets by source theme.
House
Government amendments increase Medicare levy low-income, family income and phase-in thresholds, and allow eligible pensioners to retain the pension supplement during temporary absences from Australia of up to 12 weeks.
Passed on the voices
The chamber agreed to this amendment package without a counted vote. APH records the agreed count by amendment, while the source documents are grouped into amendment sheets.
Senate
Defeated 11 to 34. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, and Nationals.
The Senate rejected the statement by 11 votes to 34, then agreed to the bill's second reading.
Defeated 25 to 32. Support came from Liberal, One Nation, Nationals, Liberal Party, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens.
The Senate rejected the changes by 25 votes to 32, so the proposed protections for these transferred assets were not added to the bill.
Defeated 11 to 34. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, and Nationals.
The Senate rejected the changes by 11 votes to 34, leaving the bill's harm-minimisation exceptions intact.
The Senate rejected the amendment on the voices, so no vote counts were recorded.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
This list includes amendment votes, procedural votes and votes on the bill itself.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Mulino urges passage of the bill, saying it will encourage charitable giving, modernise tax administration, maintain Treasury laws and stop tax incentives subsidising gambling and tobacco research except where solely intended to minimise harm.
Read in Hansard ↗Michael McCormack opposes the bill in its current form, arguing that its capital gains tax changes breach election promises and will hurt farmers and middle Australia, while calling for proper Senate committee scrutiny.
Read in Hansard ↗Sharkie supports the bill as a good start, but wants it strengthened to deny research and development tax incentives to all gambling and tobacco activities because taxpayers should not subsidise industries that cause substantial harm.
Read in Hansard ↗Ryan supports the bill's removal of research and development tax incentives for gambling and nicotine-related activities, but argues the harm-reduction exemption should also be removed and urges broader action against gambling advertising and industry influence.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
9 speakers · 10 contributions · 9 support
“That these bills be now read a second time.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Schedule 1 of this bill is a clear example of practical support for the charity and not-for-profit sector. It removes the requirement that a gift to a deductible gift recipient must be valued at $2 or more before a taxpayer can claim a deduction. That threshold has been in place since 1927, reflecting a very different era, when issuing receipts and keeping records was a manual process and the mechanics of giving looked nothing like they do today. That world has changed, and these changes enable our laws to catch up with that reality. They treat donations equally regardless of size, support innovation in fundraising and remove a threshold that no longer reflects how Australians contribute.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This particular bill also ensures that there's relief for people in the budget, particularly those that are paying the Medicare levy at lower rates of income. Schedule 5 of this bill increases the Medicare levy for low-income thresholds for singles, families, seniors and pensioners to 2.9 per cent, in line with recent movements in the consumer price index. This ensures that low-income households continue to be exempt from paying the Medicare levy or pay it at a reduced rate if their incomes have increased, in line with or less than inflation. It's a simple, fair adjustment that protects those who can least afford additional costs. Successive governments have increased these thresholds in line with CPI since 1997, and it's a longstanding practice that ensures that the Medicare levy remains progressive and equitable. More than a million low-income earners are expected to benefit from these increases in 2025-26. It's a practical example of how we're easing pressure on household budgets while maintaining the integrity of our healthcare system.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Schedule 5 of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026 implements an increase to the Medicare levy low-income thresholds. This amends the Medicare Levy Act 1986 and the A New Tax System (Medicare Levy Surcharge—Fringe Benefits) Act 1999. It will increase the thresholds for singles, families, seniors and pensioners by 2.9 per cent, in line with recent movements in the consumer price index. These changes will mean that Australians on lower incomes will continue to receive important protections when it comes to the Medicare levy.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I'm pleased to have shared the nature of schedule 4 to this bill with the chamber. There's a lot going on in this parliament at the moment, and I understand everyone wants to talk about the budget, but the details contained in this bill will have a significantly positive effect on the community. They take away the ability to research gambling and tobacco related activities and place an emphasis on harm minimisation. It is initiatives like this that do deserve to be highlighted and spoken about in this chamber, as they form part of the government's dedicated efforts towards improving harm minimisation. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill is what good economic management looks like. Labor has never believed that productivity comes from making life harder for working people. It comes from building systems that are fair, straightforward and easy to deal with. When people trust the system and can navigate it more easily, the whole economy works better. We've seen the alternative—the belief in a trickle-down economy—that far too often ends up leaving people to fend for themselves. But for Labor, our economic mission is simple: to build an economy that rewards work, values contribution and leaves no-one behind, an economy that works not just on a spreadsheet but in working people's lives. I commend the bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The challenge at the moment, though, is that round-up for charity isn't tax deductible, even though, over the course of a year, people may find themselves giving quite a considerable amount to charity. That's the advantage of what the government is doing today. Organisations that consolidate somebody's giving would be able to produce an end-of-year tax-deductible statement which would allow people to claim all of those 19c, 37c and 57c donations they'd made through the course of the year, which might, by the end of the year, add up to hundreds or even thousands of dollars. By encouraging microdonations, we're helping to achieve the government's goal of making it easier to give. My three principles for giving are that we need to have evidence, we need to have enthusiasm and we need to make it easy to donate, and this is one way, alongside simplifying donations through workplace giving and simplifying bequests, that the government is supporting the charity sector. It is a recommendation of the Productivity Commission's Future foundations for giving report that the government remove the $2 threshold for tax-deductible donations to entities with deductible gift recipient status, and this will help form part of the government's response to that report and to the blueprint report.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This legislation provides practical support to the government's goal of doubling that giving amount by the year 2030. As the member for Griffith talked about, it's those small little round-up donations that end up adding up to a lot of money, so this legislation is going to really supercharge the efforts which are exemplified by people like Charlie and Jenny and Josh and Dan.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Daniel Mulino on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Minister's second reading speech
Mulino urges passage of the bill, saying it will encourage charitable giving, modernise tax administration, maintain Treasury laws and stop tax incentives subsidising gambling and tobacco research except where solely intended to minimise harm.
“This bill amends the Treasury legislation to support philanthropic giving and strengthen the integrity of tax administration systems.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Mulino supports the bill, saying it will make the tax and pension systems more efficient and fair while encouraging charitable giving, improving tax compliance and ending subsidies for gambling- and tobacco-related research.
“This bill delivers a more efficient and fair framework for Australia's tax and pension systems. I commend the bill to the House.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
4 speakers · 2 support · 1 oppose · 1 unclear
“So I say to the government: you need to go back to the drawing board. What needs to happen with this Treasury Laws Amendment bill is that it needs to go to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee for proper scrutiny. Whether or not that will happen remains to be seen, because, obviously, the Labor government wants to do as it always does, and that's push through the legislation. I can remember not that long ago, the Labor government guillotined the appropriations bills from the budget before last, and so there was no ability for members of the opposition to represent their constituents and talk about what the bills meant to the average person out on the street.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It's wonderful to be speaking on this legislation, which we are not opposing, but I say so in the context that it's always amusing to hear Labor members of parliament get up and speak about the relevance of legislation to their electorate, while they repeat the same talking points that every other Labor member of parliament repeats, but it rarely operates in reality. We just heard about how productivity has been tickety boo under this government, which is why the Treasurer called a crisis conference on productivity and a roundtable to bring together Australia's leading business minds, plus the ACTU, to come up with a solution to the productivity crisis that apparently doesn't exist because productivity is tickety boo.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition is not opposing this bill—the Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026—in this chamber, but in the Senate we are looking to refer it to the economics committee for further scrutiny. The bill contains a range of technical tax measures. Many of the measures are sensible and many of them are non-controversial. The most significant part of this bill is the exclusion of tobacco and gambling activities from the research and development, or R&D, tax incentives. When we look at this measure, we're not necessarily opposed to it but we do want closer scrutiny.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Original question agreed to.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 2 support
“My second reading amendment actually looks to do some good. It looks to stem some of the taxpayer funding—because it's us as taxpayers that would be funding the tax breaks for the gambling industries. It's money that doesn't come into the general pool, because it's going back into the pockets of the gambling industry. So I have moved my second reading amendment, and I commend my amendment to the House. It is my great hope that in the other place the government seeks to amend this bill to make what is a good bill an even better bill. The government needs to show courage and stop predatory gambling companies from causing Australian gambling harm, and pay the price to try and prevent, manage and cure those harms. I support this bill and my amendment.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So, while I support this legislation, this is what the government should do: the government should immediately ensure that all regulatory loopholes open to the predatory gambling industry are firmly and immediately closed; the government should act immediately to address the profound health and financial harms caused by the toxic gambling industry by demonstrating, through its legislative actions, that gambling is a public health crisis that Australians can no longer afford; and the government should immediately implement the 31 reforms recommended by the Murphy report into gambling harm, starting with its cornerstone proposal for a comprehensive phased ban on all online gambling advertising.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Returned to House for further consideration
Returned to House for further consideration
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Consideration in detail: amendments considered
Amendment packages agreed
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.
Senate Economics Legislation Committee
Report tabled 30 Apr 2026
Referred to Committee (1 Apr 2026): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (30 Apr 2026)
APH bill page notes