Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment

Current status

This bill is currently before Parliament.

Policy area

Budget, tax & economy

What does this bill do?

From 1 July 2027, the responsible minister can restrict or ban regulated businesses from using a product or channel that poses a high risk of serious financial harm, such as a cryptocurrency ATM.

Why was it introduced?

The government said serious and organised crime cost Australia up to $82.3 billion in 2023–24, while criminals increasingly use new technology to disguise money from scams and other crimes. It highlighted the rapid growth of cryptocurrency ATMs: Australia had about 2,000, processing around 150,000 transactions worth about $275 million a year, and 99 per cent of those transactions were deposits. The government said the bill would let authorities respond to new high-risk channels, update terrorism-financing laws and make earlier anti-money-laundering reforms easier for businesses to follow.

Broader context

Australia already had the AML/CTF Act, strengthened by 2024 amendments, but serious and organised crime was costing up to $82.3 billion in 2023–24 while criminals increasingly used emerging technology, including a rapidly expanding network of cryptocurrency ATMs, to move illicit money. After a 16 October 2025 commitment to tackle these risks, the government introduced the bill in March 2026 to give AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. flexible powers over high-risk channels, update terrorism-financing rules and simplify compliance, and the House passed it in September 2026.

Key criticism

Melissa McIntosh (Liberal) argued that the proposed power was too broad and gave too much discretion because terms such as “significant harm” and “public interest” were not tightly defined. She was also concerned that consultation could be skipped in urgent cases and that a failure to consult would not invalidate a restriction. McIntosh said final responsibility should sit with an elected minister, and that affected businesses needed until 1 July 2027 to build systems and train staff. Mary Aldred (Liberal) raised the same concerns about loosely defined thresholds, bypassed consultation and the need for stronger oversight and more implementation time.

Who supported it?

Matt Thistlethwaite MP introduced this bill. Supportive speeches so far have come from Labor, Liberal.

Introduced in House 12 Mar 2026
Passed House 16 Sept 2026
Not yet reached Senate —
Not yet law —

Did it become law?

Not yet

Final passage

No final vote yet

The bill has not yet completed passage through Parliament.

Days since introduction

208 days

Updated 06 Oct 2026.

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. From 1 July 2027, the responsible minister can restrict or ban regulated businesses from using a product or channel that poses a high risk of serious financial harm, such as a cryptocurrency ATM. The minister must believe its use has caused, will cause or is likely to cause significant harm to the financial system or Australian community, and that action is necessary in the public interest. The minister must consider the nature and extent of the harm, whether the restriction is likely to reduce it, available alternatives and any matters set by regulations. The minister must first seek and consider advice from the head of AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system., Australia’s financial-crime regulator.

  2. The new power is not intended to be used merely because a product or channel involves digital assets or speculation, carries financial or investment risk, or makes compliance more complicated. Regulated businesses can still use innovative technologies and business models when those grounds for intervention are not met.

  3. A restriction can limit how much money or digital currency is transferred, how it is transferred or where it goes. It can also require businesses to give AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. regular information or take steps to reduce risk. Using or offering a restricted service in breach of the rules can bring civil penalties or a maximum criminal penalty of four years in prison, 1,000 penalty units, or both.

  4. Before a restriction is made, people and regulators likely to be affected must normally be consulted for at least 30 days. Consultation can be skipped in exceptional or urgent circumstances, and a consultation failure does not invalidate the restriction. A restriction can last up to three years after consultation, but only six months without it; any extension requires at least 30 days of consultation. Parliament can overturn these rules, and their supporting statements must describe any consultation AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. carried out.

  5. The definition of financing terrorism expands to cover funding a state sponsor of terrorism and a state terrorist act aimed at Australia. The government can also add specified United Nations or Australian sanctions offences to that definition, bringing them into existing suspicious-transaction reporting rules.

  6. Banks and other regulated businesses will no longer have to check whether every person acting for a customer is a politically exposed personA public figure, close relative or associate who may present a higher corruption risk. — someone whose public position can create a higher corruption risk. They must still check whether that representative is subject to targeted financial sanctions. Customer information must be reviewed when there are reasonable grounds to doubt it, rather than only when the business itself develops doubts.

  7. Rules for politically exposed people will depend on where the service is delivered. At an Australian branch, an Australian public figure is treated as domestic; at an overseas branch, that person is treated as foreign. The change does not expand the overall group covered or force businesses to repeat checks already completed.

  8. Legal-professional-privilege forms — used when protected lawyer-client material is withheld — must go to the agency that issued the information notice, rather than always going to AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system.. Either that agency or AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. can seek a civil penalty when the form requirement is breached.

  9. The bill tightens several administrative rules for regulated businesses. AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. can require updated enrolment and registration details, with changes generally due within 14 days, and can require supporting documents from money-transfer and digital-asset service providers. International-transfer reports can also be required when the overseas country is unknown, preventing uncertainty about a digital-asset provider’s location from becoming a reporting loophole.

  10. Breaches of requirements to follow a business’s anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorism-financing policies can be handled under the infringement-notice system when the conduct occurs wholly on or after the change begins.

Show source excerpts
  1. 77A Restriction or prohibition—use of products or services etc. by reporting entities Restriction or prohibition (1) The AUSTRAC CEO may, by legislative instrument, restrict or prohibit a reporting entity from using a product, service, delivery channel or thing (the high‑risk mechanism) to provide a designated service, if the AUSTRAC CEO is satisfied that: (a) using the high‑risk mechanism to provide the designated service has caused, will cause or is likely to cause, significant harm to either or both of the following: (i) the financial system; (ii) the Australian community; and (b) the
    Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment introduced text
  2. The new power will require the AUSTRAC CEO to be satisfied that the use of the high‑risk mechanism has caused, will cause or is likely to cause, significant harm to either or both of the financial system and the Australian community, and that the restriction or prohibition is necessary in the public interest. The new power is intended to support a flexible, risk‑based response to emerging and evolving money laundering and terrorism financing risks, while still allowing reporting entities to use innovative technologies and business models. It is not intended that the power be used to restrict
    Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment explanatory memorandum
  3. Kinds of restrictions (4) Without limiting the kind of restrictions the AUSTRAC CEO may impose under subsection (1), the restrictions may relate to the following: (a) the volume or value of funds remitted, virtual assets exchanged or physical currency or property transferred (whether by reference to a particular time, particular period or otherwise) using the high risk mechanism; (b) the method of remitting funds, exchanging virtual assets or transferring physical currency or property using the high risk mechanism; (c) the destination (however described) of funds remitted, virtual assets e
    Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment introduced text
  4. 77B AUSTRAC CEO to consult before making instrument (1) The AUSTRAC CEO must not make an instrument under subsection 77A(1) unless the AUSTRAC CEO has consulted: (a) persons who are reasonably likely to be affected by the instrument; and (b) if the instrument will restrict or prohibit reporting entities from using a product, service, delivery channel or thing that is regulated under a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory—the Commonwealth, State or Territory agency responsible for the administration of that law. (2) The AUSTRAC CEO must undertake consultation under subsection (1)
    Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment introduced text
  5. 1 Section 5 (paragraph (a) of the definition of financing of terrorism) Omit “or Division 103”, substitute “, Division 103, section 112.5 or Division 113”. 2 Section 5 (after paragraph (b) of the definition of financing of terrorism) (ba) an offence against the Charter of the United Nations Act 1945, or regulations made under that Act, that is prescribed by regulations made under this Act for the purposes of this paragraph; or (bb) an offence against the Autonomous Sanctions Act 2011, or a contravention of regulations made under that Act, that is prescribed by regulations made under this A
    Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment introduced text
  6. 1 Paragraph 28(2)(e) Repeal the paragraph, substitute: (e) whether: (i) the customer, any beneficial owner of the customer or any person on whose behalf the customer is receiving the designated service is a politically exposed person; or (ii) the customer, any beneficial owner of the customer, any person on whose behalf the customer is receiving the designated service, or any person acting on behalf of the customer is a person designated for targeted financial sanctions; 2 Application provision The amendment made by this Division applies in relation to a designated service that a reporti
    Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment introduced text
  7. 8 Section 5 (definition of domestic politically exposed person) Repeal the definition, substitute: domestic politically exposed person, for a designated service, means: (a) if the designated service is provided or proposed to be provided at or through a permanent establishment of a reporting entity in Australia—an Australian politically exposed person; or (b) if the designated service is provided or proposed to be provided at or through a permanent establishment of a reporting entity in a foreign country—a non‑Australian politically exposed person of that foreign country. 9 Section 5 (par
    Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment introduced text
  8. Anti‑Money Laundering and Counter‑Terrorism Financing Act 2006 14 Paragraph 49(4)(a) Omit “a person is given a notice under subsection (1)”, substitute “a person (the issuer) gives a notice under subsection (1) to another person (the recipient)”. 15 Paragraph 49(4)(b) Omit “person”, substitute “recipient”. 16 Subsection 49(4) Omit “the person must give the AUSTRAC CEO”, substitute “the recipient must give the issuer”. 17 Subsection 176(1) Omit “Only”, substitute “Subject to subsection (1A), only”. 18 After subsection 176(1) (1A) If a person (the issuer) gives another person (the reci
    Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment introduced text
  9. Anti‑Money Laundering and Counter‑Terrorism Financing Act 2006 24 Section 51F (heading) After “advise of”, insert “enrolment details or”. 25 Subsection 51F(1) Omit “any change in the person’s enrolment details that is”, substitute “any enrolment details, or change in enrolment details, that are”. 26 Subsection 51F(2) After “CEO of”, insert “enrolment details or”. 27 Paragraph 51F(2)(a) Repeal the paragraph, substitute: (i) for enrolment details—the period specified in the AML/CTF Rules; or (ii) for a change in enrolment details—14 days of the change arising; and 28 After paragraph 7
    Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment introduced text
  10. 66 Subsection 184(1C) Omit “32(1),”. 67 Subsection 184(4) (before paragraph (aa) of the definition of designated infringement notice provision) (a) subsection 26G(1) or (2) (which deal with complying with AML/CTF policies); 68 Application provision The amendment of subsection 184(4) of the Anti‑Money Laundering and Counter‑Terrorism Financing Act 2006 made by this Part applies in relation to a contravention of subsection 26G(1) or (2) of that Act if the conduct constituting the contravention of the provision occurs wholly on or after the commencement of this item.
    Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment introduced text

Broader context for this bill

Australia already had the AML/CTF Act, strengthened by 2024 amendments, but serious and organised crime was costing up to $82.3 billion in 2023–24 while criminals increasingly used emerging technology, including a rapidly expanding network of cryptocurrency ATMs, to move illicit money. After a 16 October 2025 commitment to tackle these risks, the government introduced the bill in March 2026 to give AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. flexible powers over high-risk channels, update terrorism-financing rules and simplify compliance, and the House passed it in September 2026.

  1. 2024

    Australia strengthens its existing anti-money-laundering framework

    The Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Act 2024 amended the AML/CTF Act and repealed the Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988.

    Australian Taxation Office ↗
  2. 16 Oct 2025

    Government commits to tackling organised crime and scams

    At the National Press Club, the Home Affairs minister committed to combating significant harms from organised crime and scams, setting the policy direction later taken up by the bill.

    Hansard ↗
  3. 12 Mar 2026

    Matt Thistlethwaite MP introduces the bill

    The bill was presented in the House of Representatives to give AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. a flexible way to respond to high-risk products and channels, update terrorism-financing rules and ease compliance.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  4. 10 Sept 2026

    Cryptocurrency ATMs reach about 2,000 in Australia

    The second-reading speech said Australia had grown from 23 cryptocurrency ATMs six years earlier to about 2,000, illustrating the rapidly expanding channel the bill was designed to address.

    Hansard ↗
  5. 16 Sept 2026

    House passes the bill

    The House agreed to the bill at third reading after accepting government amendments, completing its passage through the originating chamber.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 12 Mar 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 12 Mar 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Scrutiny of Bills review 25 Mar 2026

Considered by scrutiny committee (25/03/2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 5 of 2026

Scrutiny Digest 5 of 2026

APH bill page notes
Intelligence and Security review 30 Mar 2026

Referred to Committee (30/03/2026): Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security; Committee report (11/08/2026)

Report tabled 11 Aug 2026

APH bill page notes
Second reading debate 09 Sept 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate 10 Sept 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate 16 Sept 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

House second reading agreed 16 Sept 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House agreed to amendments 16 Sept 2026

The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.

Consideration in detail debate

House third reading agreed 16 Sept 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

The main case against this bill

Melissa McIntosh (Liberal) argued that the proposed power was too broad and gave too much discretion because terms such as “significant harm” and “public interest” were not tightly defined. She was also concerned that consultation could be skipped in urgent cases and that a failure to consult would not invalidate a restriction. McIntosh said final responsibility should sit with an elected minister, and that affected businesses needed until 1 July 2027 to build systems and train staff. Mary Aldred (Liberal) raised the same concerns about loosely defined thresholds, bypassed consultation and the need for stronger oversight and more implementation time.

Both speakers supported the bill’s objectives and stronger action against financial crime. The agreed government amendments moved the decision from AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system.’s chief executive to the minister, required the minister to consider AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system.’s advice, delayed the high-risk-mechanism framework until 1 July 2027 and required supporting statements to describe consultation.

Recorded votes

Amendments at a glance

Amendments grouped by chamber. Where APH reports aggregate counts, the package card summarizes the matching public amendment sheets by source theme.

House

Carried

Government package: 25 amendments

Government amendments delay Schedule 1 until 1 July 2027, transfer several AUSTRAC CEO powers to the Minister, and require the Minister to seek, consider and report on AUSTRAC CEO consultation and advice.

16 Sept 2026

Passed on the voices

The chamber agreed to this amendment package without a counted vote. APH records the agreed count by amendment, while the source documents are grouped into amendment sheets.

Themes in the public amendment sheets

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Matt Thistlethwaite

Australian Labor Party • MP 12 Mar 2026

Thistlethwaite supports the bill, arguing that it will help AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. combat money laundering, terrorism financing and criminal exploitation of high-risk technologies such as cryptocurrency ATMs while keeping the new restrictions targeted and risk based.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Melissa McIntosh

Liberal Party of Australia • MP 09 Sept 2026

McIntosh says the coalition will support the bill's passage because stronger laws are needed to combat evolving financial crime and terrorism financing, while seeking amendments to put the new high-risk mechanismA product, service or delivery channel whose use may cause significant harm. power under ministerial accountability and delay key measures until July 2027.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Tim Wilson

Liberal Party of Australia • MP 10 Sept 2026

Wilson welcomes the bill's regulation of cryptocurrency ATMs to curb scams and money laundering, while seeking a Senate inquiry to fine tune it and criticising the government for failing to tackle other sources of organised crime.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Jo Briskey

Australian Labor Party • MP 10 Sept 2026

Briskey supports the bill because it would let AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. restrict high-risk products across an entire sector, helping protect scam victims and disrupt money laundering without penalising legitimate cryptocurrency users and businesses.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

14 speakers · 14 support

  1. Madonna Jarrett Jarrett supports the bill because it gives AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. stronger, safeguarded powers to restrict high-risk financial mechanisms such as crypto ATMs and combat evolving money laundering and terrorism financing threats.
    “The Albanese Labor government is committed to protecting the integrity of our economy and preventing criminal organisations from exploiting Australians for profit. We're about protecting Australians against corruption, terrorist funding, and the ripping off of vulnerable Australians. To those who believe crypto ATMs provide a new avenue to hide criminal proceeds from law enforcement, let this message be clear. We are closing the gap, we are strengthening the system and we are giving agencies the powers they need to stop illicit activity and bring an end to money laundering. If you seek to exploit these technologies, to launder criminal profits, to evade detection or to prey on Australians, you are not beyond reach. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 09 Sept 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Claire Clutterham Clutterham supports the bill as a critical measure to combat money laundering and terrorism financing, protect Australians from cryptocurrency-related crime and give AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. targeted powers while preserving legitimate innovation and simplifying business compliance.
    “The importance of this bill cannot be underestimated. Being very clear and appropriately expansive about what qualifies as the financing of terrorism is critical. A compliance regime that regulated businesses can meet is critical. Powers to prevent the criminal abuse of our economy and the suffering this causes to Australians, to communities, to our region and, indeed, across the globe are critical. There is much to lose if a crime generates illicit profits. The proceeds are used to destabilise and damage democracies. Governments know that criminals are looking for loopholes. This government will always work to shut them down in a manner that is consistent with the rule of law but with a determination that the Australian people expect and deserve. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 09 Sept 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Matt Smith Matt Smith supports the bill, arguing that stronger AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. powers and targeted controls on high-risk mechanisms such as crypto ATMs are needed to disrupt money laundering and terrorism financing while preserving legitimate cryptocurrency use.
    “This is about protecting all of us. It's about making sure that the investments people make are safe and that the money that they put into these machines doesn't disappear and wind up in the pocket of someone who seeks to do them or their community harm. We need to get these laws through. We need to send a message to organised crime and to anyone who is considering state sponsored terrorism on Australian soil: there is no money to be made here. We will take the thing that drives you, that financial profit, that gain that you think you're going to get—we are going to take it from you and then we'll come for your freedom as well because, if you're going to pull that kind of rubbish, you belong in jail for a very, very long time.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 10 Sept 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. David Moncrieff Moncrieff supports the bill as a necessary measure to close the crypto ATM money-laundering loophole, modernise terrorism-financing laws and give AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. stronger powers to combat organised crime and hostile foreign actors.
    “By targeting money laundering, closing the crypto ATM loophole, modernising our terrorism financing laws and giving AUSTRAC the powers it needs, this bill advances the security and social cohesion of our community. Our message to organised crime syndicates and foreign hostile actors is clear: Australia is closed to illicit enterprise and will deploy the full suite of our regulatory apparatus and security agencies to combat illicit enterprise. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 10 Sept 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Jerome Laxale Laxale supports the bill because it gives AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. targeted, accountable powers to disrupt money laundering and organised crime while reducing unnecessary compliance burdens for legitimate businesses.
    “The reality of the future is that our digital economy is expanding rapidly. More and more people are interacting with our financial systems digitally, and increasingly in complex ways. The demands on our financial regulators will continue to increase as serious and organised crime try to exploit our growth and exploit these networks. Removing unnecessary administrative barriers for regulators and businesses is an important part as we sharpen our tools to crush money laundering and ensure that our financial system frameworks remain responsive and sustainable. This bill seeks to do exactly that and I commend it to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 09 Sept 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Zaneta Mascarenhas Mascarenhas supports the bill because it gives AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. a targeted and accountable power to restrict high-risk financial channels, particularly crypto ATMs used for scams and money laundering, while updating terrorism-financing laws and improving earlier reforms.
    “The Australian Institute of Criminology estimates that serious and organised crimes cost Australia up to $82 billion in the 2023-24 period. That is money that is stripped out of our economy and out of the pockets of everyday Australians. The broader anti-money-laundering and counterterrorism-financing reforms are moving the system away from this box ticking and towards outcomes and real risk management. This bill is about protecting people and cutting the fuel line to serious and organised crime. It backs our agencies with modern tools that are precise, proportionate and accountable. It makes it harder for criminals to move money and makes it easier for honest Australians to get on with their lives. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 10 Sept 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Tracey Roberts Tracey Roberts supports the bill because it strengthens protections against money laundering and terrorism financing while using consultation, safeguards and transitional rules to keep compliance practical and proportionate.
    “I want to finish by acknowledging the people who will make these reforms real in practice—the compliance teams, the small business owners, the not-for-profit leaders, the professional advisers and the staff at AUSTRAC and Home Affairs who will support implementation. Their work is often unseen, but it is vital. They are the people who help turn legislation into protection. This bill is sensible, necessary and responsible. It strengthens our defences against criminal abuse of the financial system, modernises our framework for the risks of today and gives honest Australians and the businesses they run the clarity they need to comply with confidence. For those reasons, I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 10 Sept 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Julie-Ann Campbell Campbell supports the bill because it gives AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. flexible powers to restrict high-risk financial mechanisms such as crypto ATMs, helping combat money laundering and terrorism financing while protecting legitimate users and businesses.
    “We know that crypto ATMs are a mechanism for such activity. Of course, not every usage of a crypto ATM is linked to money laundering and not every usage of a crypto ATM is linked to criminal activity. But, unfortunately, as we've learned from our law enforcement agencies, a substantial amount of the use of crypto ATMs is linked to generating profits from criminal activity. The Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill addresses the growing risks associated with crypto ATMs and the modern financial crime environment, which can be exploited to commit serious offences and harm Australia's economy and our communities.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 09 Sept 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  9. Ash Ambihaipahar Ambihaipahar supports the bill because it gives AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. a proportionate and accountable power to restrict high-risk crypto ATMs used by criminals, while preserving consultation and parliamentary scrutiny.
    “Moving to what this bill does, this legislation delivers on reforms the Minister for Home Affairs announced at the National Press Club last October, and it does three things. First, and this is the core of the bill, it gives AUSTRAC's CEO a new power to restrict or prohibit the use of high-risk mechanisms like crypto ATMs, where those mechanisms are being exploited to cause significant harm to the financial system or the Australian community. This isn't a blunt instrument. Before any restriction can be imposed, the AUSTRAC CEO must be satisfied it's necessary in the public interest, weighing the nature of the harm, whether the restrictions will actually address it and whether legitimate alternatives exist for people who rely on that service. There's a mandatory minimum 30-day consultation period with the public and affected agencies before any decision is made, except in urgent circumstances. And, because these restrictions are made by legislative instrument, this parliament retains the power to disallow them if they get the balance wrong. That's the safeguard that matters most to me. A power this significant should never operate beyond the reach of parliamentary scrutiny.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 10 Sept 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Sally Sitou Sally Sitou supports the bill because it gives AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. targeted, safeguarded powers to curb money laundering through high-risk channels such as crypto ATMs while protecting legitimate cryptocurrency use and innovation.
    “This bill delivers on the reforms announced by the Minister for Home Affairs to give AUSTRAC a new power to tackle emerging threats, including high-risk channels like crypto ATMs. Importantly, this is not a blunt instrument. It is a targeted risk based power that allows AUSTRAC to restrict and prohibit products, services and delivery channels only where there is significant harm added and where it is in the public interest to act. There are safeguards, and AUSTRAC must consider the nature of the harm, whether the proposed action will reduce that harm and whether alternative services remain available. It must also consult industry, government agencies and the public before acting, except in urgent circumstances.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 10 Sept 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  11. Anne Stanley Stanley supports the bill because it gives AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system. stronger powers to restrict high-risk mechanisms such as crypto ATMs that can facilitate money laundering, terrorism financing and scams.
    “The bill before us addresses these concerns and risk. Public consultation regarding this matter took place in late 2025 and early this year. A consultation paper outlining proposed amendments in schedule 1 and 2 has been released. Further, I understand that AUSTRAC has begun a proactive campaign to inform Australians about these proposed changes. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 10 Sept 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  12. Julian Hill Hill supports the bill as a way to curb serious and organised crime by restricting high-risk money-transfer mechanisms, including crypto ATMs, and clarifying anti-money-laundering obligations.
    “Importantly, part of disrupting criminal networks—who are commodity agnostic and don't care whether it's Gucci handbags or guns or drugs or tobacco; they just want to make money—and their trade is to make it harder and harder for them to move money around. The anti-money-laundering and counterterrorism financing laws are a really important part of that. I foreshadow that, in a moment, when we get to the next stage of the bill's passage through the parliament, I will be moving government amendments reflecting the recommendations of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 16 Sept 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

3 speakers · 3 support

  1. Mary Aldred Mary Aldred says the coalition supports the bill’s stronger action against money laundering and terrorism financing, but wants tighter oversight of AUSTRACAustralia’s regulator and intelligence agency for detecting criminal use of the financial system.’s new powers and delayed commencement dates so affected organisations can prepare.
    “There are important measures in this bill that the coalition support. This bill will give AUSTRAC greater capacity to act quickly against high-risk financial mechanisms. That is important. Michael Outram, the former head of Australian Border Force—and I want to acknowledge Mr Outram's service to our country. But I also want to acknowledge his thoughtful, evidence based and experienced contributions in a number of speeches recently. The illicit tobacco trade is something about which he's provided some really important contributions. In the context of this bill, some of the activities that it's seeking to address show that some of Mr Outram's comments and contributions to this broader national debate have been important.”

    Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 09 Sept 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat