No enforceable decision deadlines
The bill could allow decisions on insurance products to drag on because it does not impose clear, enforceable timeframes, potentially disadvantaging consumers.
This bill is currently before Parliament.
Health, care & disability
Patients can compare doctors’ fees, Medicare payments and likely out-of-pocket costs on the Medical Costs Finder, a government price-comparison website.
Mark Butler (Australian Labor Party) said costs caused 8.6 per cent of people — more than 800,000 Australians — to delay or miss specialist care in 2024-25. The Medical Costs Finder, a government price-comparison website, had attracted only 1–2 per cent of specialists and 10 per cent of insurers by December 2025. He also said product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one. — replacing a policy with a similar, more expensive one — left 15.3 million insured Australians without enough protection from price changes.
Since 2022, the Medical Costs Finder has offered a way to compare practitioner fees and private-health costs, but participation remained very low, while rising specialist bills meant 8.6% of Australians delayed or missed specialist care because of cost in 2024–25. Insurers also closed and replaced products to raise prices without premiumThe price charged for insurance. scrutiny, including sharp increases reported in 2025 and 2026, so the Government introduced this Bill to allow billing data to be published by default and to require insurers to seek approval for new or reduced-cover products.
Monique Ryan (Independent) argued that one figure based on the previous year’s fees could be misleading or become outdated. She said publishing prices would expose high costs but would not itself make care affordable, reduce specialist fees or improve doctor shortages. Andrew Wallace (Liberal National Party) warned that incorrect published fees could harm doctors while the department was protected from being sued. He also argued that requiring approval for every new product was too broad and could delay useful insurance products. Allegra Spender (Independent) said the bill needed firm deadlines for decisions on insurers’ applications.
Mark Butler MP introduced this bill. Supportive speeches so far have come from Labor, Nationals, Liberal Party, LNP, some crossbench members.
Did it become law?
Not yet
Final passage
Recorded vote so far
3 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Days since introduction
176 days
Updated 07 Aug 2026.
Meaning
Patients can compare doctors’ fees, Medicare payments and likely out-of-pocket costs on the Medical Costs Finder, a government price-comparison website.
Patients can see doctors’ qualifications, specialties, languages and practice locations alongside their prices.
Patients can compare hospitals and health insurers, including their payment arrangements and the costs left for policyholders to pay.
Patients will not have their personal information published. Existing government billing records will supply the information instead of doctors uploading it.
Doctors, hospitals and insurers can ask the department to review published information about them. They can also challenge government decision-making in court.
Private health insurance customers gain protection from product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one., where an insurer replaces a product with a similar, more expensive one. New-product premiums need ministerial approvalFormal permission from the responsible minister..
Private health insurance customers gain oversight when an insurer reduces existing cover or benefits. The new rules commence on 18 September 2026.
New section 124ZY allows the Secretary to publish certain information about “professional services” provided by or on behalf of a “medical practitioner”. The terms “professional service” and “medical practitioner” are defined in section 3(1) of the HI Act. A note to subsection 124ZY(1) makes clear to readers that it is an authorisation for the purpose of the Privacy Act 1988 and other laws. This is intended to include contractual and equitable obligations of confidence in addition to obligations under the Australian Privacy Principles. Medical practitioners (as defined) includes general pracHealth Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum
information relating to particular medical practitioners who render professional services or on whose behalf professional services are rendered, including: the practitioner’s name (refer subparagraph 124ZY(2)(c)(i)), their qualifications and specialties (refer subparagraph 124ZY(2)(c)(ii)), languages spoken by the practitioner (refer subparagraph 124ZY(2)(c)(iii)), information about the locations and hospitals where these professional services are provided (refer paragraph 124ZY(2)(d)). The personal information mentioned in paragraph 124ZY(2)(c) is publicly available on the Australian HeaHealth Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum
allow for the publication of information about medical practitioners and their billing (including names, qualifications, specialty, any languages spoken, fees charged by location, their utilisation of gap cover arrangements with insurers) allow for the publication of information about healthcare facilities such as hospitals (including information about medical practitioners who provide services at the facility, and insurers that have gap cover or contracting arrangements with the facility) allow for the publication of information about insurers (including proportion of policy holders who expHealth Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum
To support greater transparency, specialists and insurers have been given the opportunity since 2022 to participate in the Medical Costs Finder and publish their fees and out-of-pocket costs data. Uptake has been disappointing; only 1–2% of specialists and 10% of insurers were participating on the website as at December 2025. The amendments will allow for the publication of the relevant data on the Medical Costs Finder, without the need for input from medical practitioners as it will be drawn from Medicare, hospital and insurer billing data collected by government. Importantly, the amendmentsHealth Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum
To support the proposed publication of the information on the Medical Costs Finder, the department is developing an analytical approach for the derivation of a single fee figure that can be published for a medical practitioner’s provision of a service for a given financial year (similarly with figures that can be published with regards to hospitals and insurers). The approach will ensure patient privacy is protected and that figures published are credible and meaningful for consumers. The department will publish information about the analytical approach and establish a process for medical praHealth Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum
The PHI Act requires private health insurers to apply to the Minister for approval to change the premiums charged under a complying health insurance product. The process for approving premiums has been managed administratively through an annual ‘Premium Round’. However, insurers can close and open products at any time without Ministerial scrutiny. This has allowed insurers to close an existing product and open an identical or similar new product at a higher premium, thus avoiding the requirement for premium change approval (this is known as ‘product phoenixing’). This Bill seeks to improve coHealth Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum
This Bill seeks to improve consumer confidence in private health insurance by strengthening PHI Act provisions for Ministerial oversight of private health insurance premiums. The amendments include new requirements for insurers to apply to the Minister for approval of premiums charged: for a new product where changes are made that reduce cover, a benefit or another term or condition of an existing product. The new premium approval requirements will apply alongside current PHI Act requirements for Ministerial approval for changes to premiums for an existing complying health insurance productHealth Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum
Context
Since 2022, the Medical Costs Finder has offered a way to compare practitioner fees and private-health costs, but participation remained very low, while rising specialist bills meant 8.6% of Australians delayed or missed specialist care because of cost in 2024–25. Insurers also closed and replaced products to raise prices without premiumThe price charged for insurance. scrutiny, including sharp increases reported in 2025 and 2026, so the Government introduced this Bill to allow billing data to be published by default and to require insurers to seek approval for new or reduced-cover products.
Specialists and insurers begin voluntary Medical Costs Finder participation
The scheme gave practitioners and insurers an opportunity to publish fees and out-of-pocket costThe amount a patient pays themselves. information for consumers.
Health Legislation Amendment explanatory memorandum ↗Cost delays specialist treatment for more than 800,000 people
The explanatory memorandum says 8.6% of Australians delayed or missed specialist care because of cost during 2024–25.
Health Legislation Amendment explanatory memorandum ↗Ombudsman finds insurers closing old policies and reopening pricier ones
The Commonwealth Ombudsman found evidence of insurers closing existing policies and introducing more expensive replacements, prompting a warning from Health Minister Mark Butler.
ABC News ↗HCF raises gold policy prices by 35% after closing the existing policy
HCF closed its existing gold policy and required new gold members to take out extras while the government-approved average premiumThe price charged for insurance. increase was 3.73%.
ABC News ↗Medical Costs Finder participation remains very low
Only 1–2% of specialists and 10% of insurers were participating in the Medical Costs Finder by December 2025.
Health Legislation Amendment explanatory memorandum ↗Mark Butler MP introduces the bill
Mark Butler MP introduced the bill in the House of Representatives to improve fee transparency and prevent insurers avoiding premiumThe price charged for insurance. scrutiny by replacing products.
Hansard ↗CHOICE reports private health premiums rising by up to 25%
CHOICE analysis found premiums for some private health policies would rise sharply, including an average 13.3% increase for gold-level cover from the five largest funds.
ABC News ↗House passes the bill
The House of Representatives agreed to the bill at second and third reading, completing its passage through the originating chamber.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Considered by scrutiny committee (25/02/2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 3 of 2026
Scrutiny Digest 3 of 2026
APH bill page notesReferred to Committee (05/03/2026): Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee; Committee report (15/04/2026)
Report tabled 15 Apr 2026
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Key criticism
Monique Ryan (Independent) argued that one figure based on the previous year’s fees could be misleading or become outdated. She said publishing prices would expose high costs but would not itself make care affordable, reduce specialist fees or improve doctor shortages. Andrew Wallace (Liberal National Party) warned that incorrect published fees could harm doctors while the department was protected from being sued. He also argued that requiring approval for every new product was too broad and could delay useful insurance products. Allegra Spender (Independent) said the bill needed firm deadlines for decisions on insurers’ applications.
All three supported the bill’s broad goals or passage. Ryan called mandatory publication an important step, Wallace said the Coalition supported price transparency and closing the phoenixing loophole, and Spender supported stronger oversight.
No enforceable decision deadlines
The bill could allow decisions on insurance products to drag on because it does not impose clear, enforceable timeframes, potentially disadvantaging consumers.
Affordability reforms fall short
Greater price transparency would not necessarily make specialist care affordable without wider changes to billing, Medicare rebates, insurer payouts, contracting and system oversight.
Further sources
Votes
Amendments grouped by chamber. Where APH reports aggregate counts, the package card summarizes the matching public amendment sheets by source theme.
House
Defeated 10 to 71. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, and Nationals.
The House rejected the proposal, so the bill proceeded without these timeframe commitments.
Defeated 10 to 71. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Liberal.
The House rejected the proposal, so these additional affordability reforms were not added to its second-reading position.
Defeated 9 to 69. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Nationals, and minor parties and independents.
The House rejected the changes, leaving those publication and reporting details to the government's implementation process rather than specifying them in the bill.
Government amendments delay commencement to 18 September 2026, refine approved application periods and designated changes, and clarify how private health insurance rules apply to existing and new products.
Passed on the voices
The chamber agreed to this amendment package without a counted vote. APH records the agreed count by amendment, while the source documents are grouped into amendment sheets.
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Butler supports the bill because it would help patients compare specialist fees and likely out-of-pocket costs, while preventing insurers from avoiding ministerial scrutiny by replacing products with costlier or less valuable versions.
Read in Hansard ↗Spender opposes giving the bill a second reading despite supporting its transparency and oversight reforms, arguing that it needs clear, enforceable timeframes for decisions on insurance products so delays do not disadvantage consumers.
Read in Hansard ↗Ryan supports the bill as an important step toward transparent medical pricing and preventing private health insurance product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one., but argues that it will not make specialist care affordable without broader reforms to billing practices, Medicare rebates and workforce planning.
Read in Hansard ↗Scamps supports the bill because publishing clearer medical fee information and stopping product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one. are necessary consumer protections, but says broader reform is also needed, including an independent private health system authority, a minimum payout ratio and fairer contracting rules.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
22 speakers · 24 contributions · 22 support
“This bill legislates wider scrutiny of premiums so consumers can be more confident in the value of their private health insurance. This bill begins to put that right by giving patients better information when making decisions about specialist care, strengthening informed financial consent, closing a loophole that has undermined confidence in private health insurance and providing stronger safeguards against unregulated charging behaviour. It builds on the Albanese Labor government's broader work to strengthen Medicare, lower health costs and make our health system fairer for all Australians to navigate. For families across Griffith, that means better information, stronger protections and even more confidence in the choices before them.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Today I rise to support the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026, brought forward by the Minister for Health and Ageing, and I commend him for doing so. I'm so proud to be part of the Albanese Labor government as we remain resolute in our commitment to make quality health care accessible for every Australian.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“With this bill, we're going further. We're protecting consumers who are under the private health insurance system as well because that is a key part of our healthcare system. We're providing greater transparency so that patients and people who need medical care can make informed decisions in relation to their health care. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Like the member opposite who just spoke, I've also met with many constituents about the rising costs of private health care, private health insurance and seeing specialists. So I'm really pleased to stand today to support this legislation, because, like the actions that we have taken to strengthen Medicare and to breathe life back into our universal health system in communities like mine, I'm pleased that we are also reaching into this space, which is incredibly important.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“At the end of the day, that is what this is all about. It is about patients. It is about helping people get the care they need when they need it without unnecessary stress or confusion. That is something that everyone in this House should support, and I really hope those opposite get onboard and support this, because at the end of the day the people in the Hunter and the people all around Australia want to see us work together. They want an opposition that works with us in government so we can make Australia a better and fairer place. That is why this bill is so important and that is why I support this bill. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Having worked in the sector for a couple of decades, I know how important our health system underpinned by Medicare is to the quality of life we enjoy as Australians. This government is acting to ensure that the health system continues to support the health of Australians. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to speak today on this very important bill. I support the introduction and passage of the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026. It is a very important bill when it comes to the transparency of our private health insurers. Improving transparency assists the consumer. It ensures that transparency is there, and it gives confidence in the system and confidence in the private health legislation area.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026 represents the first significant step in taking action to address the impact of specialist fee charging and the consequential out-of-pocket costs for consumers. It delivers on two election commitments: to expand ministerial scrutiny of premiums to provide assurance around the cost and value of private health insurance by driving more transparency on patient medical fees and a commitment to outlaw product phoenixing. The legislation further strengthens Medicare by helping Australians find the best value when they need specialist medical advice and treatment and provides more confidence in their private health insurance by outlawing, as I said, product phoenixing. It will enable Australians to make more informed decisions about their health care and private health insurance.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Australians should not need to be experts in item numbers, gap schedules and the fine print to protect their families. They should not discover the true cost of care only after they've had to commit to it. They should not see their insurance product re-emerge under a new name at a higher price without proper scrutiny. This bill responds to those expectations. It complements Medicare's universal foundation by improving transparency and accountability in the private system. It empowers patients with clearer, comparable information. It strengthens consumer protection by ending product phoenixing and applying consistent oversight to meaningful changes in price and value, and it further embeds fairness in our healthcare system. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill does increase transparency and it does mean costs will be findable by patients prior to their consultation or hospitalisation. It is really important that people do get that transparency so they can find out how much doctors will charge them and how much they will have to pay out of pocket. It is very important to understand that there are some procedures that we do now that weren't available in the time of the advent of Medicare. Because the rebates don't exactly fit the procedure, sometimes the costs are much higher than for the previous treatments. It is reasonable, though, that specialists make their fees available for patients.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to speak in support of the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026. There are two key purposes to this bill. Firstly, it amends the Health Insurance Act 1973 and the Private Health Insurance Act 2007 to allow the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing to publish information for consumers on medical fees charged by medical practitioners, including specialists and general practitioners, together with the likely out-of-pocket costs for their private healthcare experience. The purpose is to support greater transparency and healthcare pricing, helping consumers make informed decisions about their health care and obtain better value from private health insurers.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We know that the cost of medical and hospital services is a key driver of health inflation for consumers, which ultimately feeds into higher out-of-pocket costs and higher private health insurance premiums. We know that fees can vary widely across specialists, even for the same procedure in the same part of Australia. And we know that this is hurting Australians. That is why we promised to address this issue, and that is why we are delivering on this promise and advocating the passing of this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill delivers on our promise to strengthen Medicare and to make private health insurance work better for those Australians who can afford to pay for it. It delivers real transparency in specialist fees, real protection against unfair premium hikes and real power for patients to make the best decisions for their families. We are fixing the $24 million—wishy washy, self-reporting, if you can be bothered—website that those opposite set up to track specialist fees. We are creating a system to ensure all healthcare providers and insurers are held accountable and act in the best interests of patients. We want to remove bill shock when it comes to health care. We want the light to shine in; the cost of health care should not be a mystery. We also need to ensure that our private and public health systems work together to continue to deliver the best health care in the world. I love this bill and I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Julie-Ann Campbell on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Campbell supports the bill because it will help patients compare specialist costs, close the product-phoenixing loophole and strengthen oversight of private health insurance premiums and coverage changes.
“This bill will ensure Australian patients have the power to compare costs and make informed choices about their own medical care, while not imposing any administrative burden on doctors. Specifically, the bill will amend the Health Insurance Act and the Private Health Insurance Act to allow for the publication of information about medical practitioners, including their names, their locations, their fees charged by location and their use of gap cover arrangements with insurers. It will also allow for publication of information about hospitals and insurers, including gap cover and contracting arrangements, and the proportion of policyholders experiencing various out-of-pocket costs. Consumer peak bodies and insurer bodies are highly supportive, given the growth in specialist fees and out-of-pocket costs and the rising costs of living.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Campbell argues that the bill addresses a serious transparency gap by helping private health consumers understand specialist medical costs before making an appointment, reducing financial risk for families under cost-of-living pressure.
“In 2026, you can compare the prices of flights to London in seconds. You can research the price of second-hand cars within a 50-kilometre radius. You can check what your neighbour sold their house for last week. It is seamless, it is easy and it's at your fingertips. But when you need to see a medical specialist, when the stakes could not be higher, you are expected to make an appointment without knowing what it will cost you, without knowing the impact on your hip pocket and without knowing the price tag for your family. As families in my local community of Moreton face cost-of-living pressures, that information gap is not a minor inconvenience; it's a real financial risk.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“In wrapping up, this legislation is good legislation. It provides information out there in the marketplace that people will access, and ultimately that will reduce the cost of health services for people who need them throughout this country. I commend the legislation to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill will close that loophole. It will outlaw the practice of product phoenixing, ensuring that insurers cannot bypass government oversight by gaming the system with technical restructures and product relaunches. If a premium increase is not approved, insurers will not be able to simply repackage the product and impose it anyway. This reform strengthens consumer protection, and it sends a clear message: transparency and fairness are not optional in Australia's health system. Labor believes that, whether you rely solely on Medicare or choose to take out private cover, you deserve honesty, accountability and respect. This bill delivers exactly that. By increasing transparency in pricing and expanding consumer protections, we are making sure the healthcare system continues to work for all Australians.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill is about restoring confidence and fairness to that system. It aims to give patients clearer information and a fairer deal when they use private health care. It does that in two main ways: by fixing how specialist fees and out-of-pocket costs are published, and by tightening oversight of private health insurance premiums so insurers cannot dodge scrutiny through 'product phoenixing'.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In conclusion, this bill is a clear-eyed response to the cost-of-living pressures that are facing Australians. It empowers patients with data on specialist fees, protects consumers from corporate trickery and reinforces our longstanding commitment to a Medicare system that is strong and fair. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Again, this sits very much with the philosophy of this government, which is about real change—about actually making an impact where it needs to be made and not resting on our laurels. I commend the bill on the basis that this is going to fix this problem. It is going to save insurers from themselves, and it is going to mean that Australian consumers can get the insurance that they need at the cost that is fair and reasonable.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Mark Butler, including an amendment-moving contribution. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Moved amendment
Butler supports the bill because it would help patients compare specialist fees and likely out-of-pocket costs, while preventing insurers from avoiding ministerial scrutiny by replacing products with costlier or less valuable versions.
“These reforms are an important step in holding private health insurers to account and empowering consumers to make informed decisions about the costs of their health care.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Butler supports the bill because it will give private health patients clearer information about fees and likely out-of-pocket costs, while strengthening ministerial oversight to prevent insurers evading premiumThe price charged for insurance. scrutiny through product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one.. The government will reject the member for Kooyong's amendments but says it shares their intent and will continue working with stakeholders.
“Schedule 1 of this bill makes important changes to support greater transparency in healthcare pricing, which will help Australians make more informed decisions about their private healthcare choices. It does that by providing consumers with more detailed information on the medical fees that they can expect to be charged and their likely out-of-pocket costs for their private health experience. Currently, consumers have more information about routine goods and services in the community than they do about healthcare choices, choices that can have a profound impact on their quality of life but also on their finances. Without passage of this schedule, we would continue to see many Australians simply not knowing what their private healthcare journey was going to cost until they were in it. Right now, they're unable to easily compare the costs of alternative providers and therefore unable to make an informed choice about their healthcare.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“I rise today to speak in support of the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026. This bill is fundamentally about fairness. It is about making sure Australians can make informed decisions about their health care—decisions grounded in transparency, clarity and genuine choice. For too long, too many Australians have been left in the dark about the true costs of private medical treatment. This legislation changes that.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“At its core, this legislation delivers on the Albanese government's commitment to strengthen Medicare while ensuring Australians who engage with the private health system are better informed, better protected and better supported. This reform is about giving Australians the information they need and closing the loopholes that undermine confidence in the system. Australians should not need to be health experts or to do hours of research to understand what they're being charged. They should not be left guessing about out-of-pocket costs or whether their insurance policy will actually deliver when they need it most. This bill is about fixing that. It is about enabling Australians to make informed decisions about their health care and their private health insurance.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
5 speakers · 5 support
“While I support this bill, I call on the minister to go further. Implement the necessary mechanisms to ensure health insurers pay their fair share by mandating a return to 90 per cent benefit ratios from annual premiums. I also urge the minister, for the sake of Australians, to seriously consider the need for a mandatory code of conduct in contracting between private health insurers and private hospitals.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The coalition supports ensuring greater transparency in healthcare pricing and the need to help consumers make informed decisions about their health care and obtain better value from private health insurance. To ensure we preserve Australia's private health system, the coalition believes the legislation requires careful scrutiny through a Senate inquiry. Labor's reckless spending and economic mismanagement is pushing up costs across the board, and health care is another victim of that.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We're not opposing this bill. We are doing what an opposition should do. We're insisting that legislation affecting 15 million Australians and the clinicians who serve them is properly designed before it becomes law. The government has had more than a year to work out the details of this policy. The fact that so many fundamental questions remain unanswered is not good enough. The coalition will strive to make this bill better.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The second change to which I referred broadly aligns with the current process for premium changes for existing products while enlarging ministerial oversight of premium setting of new private health insurance products. The change is attempting to address the risk of product phoenixing, where an existing insurance product can be closed and an identical or similar new product then opened at a higher premium, skirting and getting around the requirement for premium change approval. The coalition is not going to stand in the way of this, because what we want to see is people being able to access help, certainly in regional areas. Particularly at the moment, as the member for Mallee outlined, there are so many people who cannot access their health diagnosis. They cannot get to their doctors' appointments at the practice or the surgery simply because they can't afford to pay for the fuel—that's if they could even fill up their tank, because, at the moment, we've got a crisis.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Australians deserve choice, quality and timely access to health care. The coalition support greater transparency and a strong private health system because we know that leads to better outcomes for our public hospitals and all Australian patients. However, changes to the regulation of private health insurance and specialists must be carefully examined to avoid unintended consequences for consumers, patients and the broader health system. For that reason, while the coalition will support this bill in the House we believe it must be subject to further scrutiny through a Senate inquiry. This inquiry must investigate the spiralling out-of-pocket healthcare costs being overseen by this government, which this bill will not address. It is time for the Prime Minister to stop waving around his Medicare card and start addressing the rising affordability issues facing Australian patients because of his government's economic mismanagement.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
4 speakers · 3 support · 1 oppose
“"declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Australians deserve a healthcare system that is accessible, affordable and genuinely centred on patients. With those principles in mind and without declining to give this bill a second reading, I commend this bill to the House, and I move amendments (1) to (4) in my name:”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill deserves support. Publishing more accurate fee and rebate information on the Medical Costs Finder and closing down product phoenixing are sensible and necessary reforms. Both have been welcomed by key sector voices and both should pass. But parliament should not mistake this bill for a complete reform agenda. The evidence is clear—if we are serious about protecting patient choice, keeping private care accessible and preventing spillover into the public system, then we need the next step as well: an independent private health system authority, backed by a legislated 90 per cent minimum payout ratio; fair contracting rules; stronger surprise-billing protections; and product reform that reflects the realities of chronic disease and an ageing population.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These are sensible measures, and I'll support them, but they must be seen as the beginning, not the end, of the work that needs to be done. The government's argument for the bill is that informed consumers make better decisions. That's true, but information alone can cut both ways. When price information is published without context, we know that some providers simply increase their fees to match the market rate, and there's a persistent perception among some patients that a higher fee must mean higher quality care. Unless people can access better information about clinical outcomes, complication rates, readmission and wait times, we risk reinforcing this false choice. That's the last thing households facing cost-of-living pressures need. We must monitor, in real time, what happens after this information goes live. Are median fees rising? Are prices clustering at the top of the range? Are patients gravitating to higher priced practitioners without any evidence of better care? If so, the government must be ready to act, whether through enhanced quality reporting or targeted intervention.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Consideration in detail: amendments considered
Amendment packages agreed
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills
Scrutiny Digest 3 of 2026
Considered by scrutiny committee (25 Feb 2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 3 of 2026
APH bill page notesSenate Community Affairs Legislation Committee
Report tabled 15 Apr 2026
Referred to Committee (5 Mar 2026): Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee; Committee report (15 Apr 2026)
APH bill page notes