Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers)

Current status

This bill is currently before Parliament.

Policy area

Health, care & disability

What does this bill do?

Patients can compare doctors’ fees, Medicare payments and likely out-of-pocket costs on the Medical Costs Finder, a government price-comparison website.

Why was it introduced?

Mark Butler (Australian Labor Party) said costs caused 8.6 per cent of people — more than 800,000 Australians — to delay or miss specialist care in 2024-25. The Medical Costs Finder, a government price-comparison website, had attracted only 1–2 per cent of specialists and 10 per cent of insurers by December 2025. He also said product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one. — replacing a policy with a similar, more expensive one — left 15.3 million insured Australians without enough protection from price changes.

Broader context

Since 2022, the Medical Costs Finder has offered a way to compare practitioner fees and private-health costs, but participation remained very low, while rising specialist bills meant 8.6% of Australians delayed or missed specialist care because of cost in 2024–25. Insurers also closed and replaced products to raise prices without premiumThe price charged for insurance. scrutiny, including sharp increases reported in 2025 and 2026, so the Government introduced this Bill to allow billing data to be published by default and to require insurers to seek approval for new or reduced-cover products.

Key criticism

Monique Ryan (Independent) argued that one figure based on the previous year’s fees could be misleading or become outdated. She said publishing prices would expose high costs but would not itself make care affordable, reduce specialist fees or improve doctor shortages. Andrew Wallace (Liberal National Party) warned that incorrect published fees could harm doctors while the department was protected from being sued. He also argued that requiring approval for every new product was too broad and could delay useful insurance products. Allegra Spender (Independent) said the bill needed firm deadlines for decisions on insurers’ applications.

Who supported it?

Mark Butler MP introduced this bill. Supportive speeches so far have come from Labor, Nationals, Liberal Party, LNP, some crossbench members.

Introduced in House 12 Feb 2026
Passed House 25 June 2026
At second reading in Senate 29 June 2026
Not yet law

Did it become law?

Not yet

Final passage

Recorded vote so far

3 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Days since introduction

176 days

Updated 07 Aug 2026.

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Patients can compare doctors’ fees, Medicare payments and likely out-of-pocket costs on the Medical Costs Finder, a government price-comparison website.

  2. Patients can see doctors’ qualifications, specialties, languages and practice locations alongside their prices.

  3. Patients can compare hospitals and health insurers, including their payment arrangements and the costs left for policyholders to pay.

  4. Patients will not have their personal information published. Existing government billing records will supply the information instead of doctors uploading it.

  5. Doctors, hospitals and insurers can ask the department to review published information about them. They can also challenge government decision-making in court.

  6. Private health insurance customers gain protection from product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one., where an insurer replaces a product with a similar, more expensive one. New-product premiums need ministerial approvalFormal permission from the responsible minister..

  7. Private health insurance customers gain oversight when an insurer reduces existing cover or benefits. The new rules commence on 18 September 2026.

Show source excerpts
  1. New section 124ZY allows the Secretary to publish certain information about “professional services” provided by or on behalf of a “medical practitioner”. The terms “professional service” and “medical practitioner” are defined in section 3(1) of the HI Act. A note to subsection 124ZY(1) makes clear to readers that it is an authorisation for the purpose of the Privacy Act 1988 and other laws. This is intended to include contractual and equitable obligations of confidence in addition to obligations under the Australian Privacy Principles. Medical practitioners (as defined) includes general prac
    Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum
  2. information relating to particular medical practitioners who render professional services or on whose behalf professional services are rendered, including: the practitioner’s name (refer subparagraph 124ZY(2)(c)(i)), their qualifications and specialties (refer subparagraph 124ZY(2)(c)(ii)), languages spoken by the practitioner (refer subparagraph 124ZY(2)(c)(iii)), information about the locations and hospitals where these professional services are provided (refer paragraph 124ZY(2)(d)). The personal information mentioned in paragraph 124ZY(2)(c) is publicly available on the Australian Hea
    Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum
  3. allow for the publication of information about medical practitioners and their billing (including names, qualifications, specialty, any languages spoken, fees charged by location, their utilisation of gap cover arrangements with insurers) allow for the publication of information about healthcare facilities such as hospitals (including information about medical practitioners who provide services at the facility, and insurers that have gap cover or contracting arrangements with the facility) allow for the publication of information about insurers (including proportion of policy holders who exp
    Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum
  4. To support greater transparency, specialists and insurers have been given the opportunity since 2022 to participate in the Medical Costs Finder and publish their fees and out-of-pocket costs data. Uptake has been disappointing; only 1–2% of specialists and 10% of insurers were participating on the website as at December 2025. The amendments will allow for the publication of the relevant data on the Medical Costs Finder, without the need for input from medical practitioners as it will be drawn from Medicare, hospital and insurer billing data collected by government. Importantly, the amendments
    Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum
  5. To support the proposed publication of the information on the Medical Costs Finder, the department is developing an analytical approach for the derivation of a single fee figure that can be published for a medical practitioner’s provision of a service for a given financial year (similarly with figures that can be published with regards to hospitals and insurers). The approach will ensure patient privacy is protected and that figures published are credible and meaningful for consumers. The department will publish information about the analytical approach and establish a process for medical pra
    Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum
  6. The PHI Act requires private health insurers to apply to the Minister for approval to change the premiums charged under a complying health insurance product. The process for approving premiums has been managed administratively through an annual ‘Premium Round’. However, insurers can close and open products at any time without Ministerial scrutiny. This has allowed insurers to close an existing product and open an identical or similar new product at a higher premium, thus avoiding the requirement for premium change approval (this is known as ‘product phoenixing’). This Bill seeks to improve co
    Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum
  7. This Bill seeks to improve consumer confidence in private health insurance by strengthening PHI Act provisions for Ministerial oversight of private health insurance premiums. The amendments include new requirements for insurers to apply to the Minister for approval of premiums charged: for a new product where changes are made that reduce cover, a benefit or another term or condition of an existing product. The new premium approval requirements will apply alongside current PHI Act requirements for Ministerial approval for changes to premiums for an existing complying health insurance product
    Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) explanatory memorandum

Broader context for this bill

Since 2022, the Medical Costs Finder has offered a way to compare practitioner fees and private-health costs, but participation remained very low, while rising specialist bills meant 8.6% of Australians delayed or missed specialist care because of cost in 2024–25. Insurers also closed and replaced products to raise prices without premiumThe price charged for insurance. scrutiny, including sharp increases reported in 2025 and 2026, so the Government introduced this Bill to allow billing data to be published by default and to require insurers to seek approval for new or reduced-cover products.

  1. Since 2022

    Specialists and insurers begin voluntary Medical Costs Finder participation

    The scheme gave practitioners and insurers an opportunity to publish fees and out-of-pocket costThe amount a patient pays themselves. information for consumers.

    Health Legislation Amendment explanatory memorandum ↗
  2. 2024–25

    Cost delays specialist treatment for more than 800,000 people

    The explanatory memorandum says 8.6% of Australians delayed or missed specialist care because of cost during 2024–25.

    Health Legislation Amendment explanatory memorandum ↗
  3. 09 Dec 2024

    Ombudsman finds insurers closing old policies and reopening pricier ones

    The Commonwealth Ombudsman found evidence of insurers closing existing policies and introducing more expensive replacements, prompting a warning from Health Minister Mark Butler.

    ABC News ↗
  4. 31 Mar 2025

    HCF raises gold policy prices by 35% after closing the existing policy

    HCF closed its existing gold policy and required new gold members to take out extras while the government-approved average premiumThe price charged for insurance. increase was 3.73%.

    ABC News ↗
  5. December 2025

    Medical Costs Finder participation remains very low

    Only 1–2% of specialists and 10% of insurers were participating in the Medical Costs Finder by December 2025.

    Health Legislation Amendment explanatory memorandum ↗
  6. 12 Feb 2026

    Mark Butler MP introduces the bill

    Mark Butler MP introduced the bill in the House of Representatives to improve fee transparency and prevent insurers avoiding premiumThe price charged for insurance. scrutiny by replacing products.

    Hansard ↗
  7. 19 Mar 2026

    CHOICE reports private health premiums rising by up to 25%

    CHOICE analysis found premiums for some private health policies would rise sharply, including an average 13.3% increase for gold-level cover from the five largest funds.

    ABC News ↗
  8. 25 June 2026

    House passes the bill

    The House of Representatives agreed to the bill at second and third reading, completing its passage through the originating chamber.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 12 Feb 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 12 Feb 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Scrutiny of Bills review 25 Feb 2026

Considered by scrutiny committee (25/02/2026): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 3 of 2026

Scrutiny Digest 3 of 2026

APH bill page notes
Community Affairs review 05 Mar 2026

Referred to Committee (05/03/2026): Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee; Committee report (15/04/2026)

Report tabled 15 Apr 2026

APH bill page notes
Second reading debate 25 Mar 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

House second reading agreed 25 June 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House agreed to amendment packages 25 June 2026

The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.

Consideration in detail debate

House third reading agreed 25 June 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 29 June 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 29 June 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

The main case against this bill

Monique Ryan (Independent) argued that one figure based on the previous year’s fees could be misleading or become outdated. She said publishing prices would expose high costs but would not itself make care affordable, reduce specialist fees or improve doctor shortages. Andrew Wallace (Liberal National Party) warned that incorrect published fees could harm doctors while the department was protected from being sued. He also argued that requiring approval for every new product was too broad and could delay useful insurance products. Allegra Spender (Independent) said the bill needed firm deadlines for decisions on insurers’ applications.

All three supported the bill’s broad goals or passage. Ryan called mandatory publication an important step, Wallace said the Coalition supported price transparency and closing the phoenixing loophole, and Spender supported stronger oversight.

No enforceable decision deadlines

The bill could allow decisions on insurance products to drag on because it does not impose clear, enforceable timeframes, potentially disadvantaging consumers.

Raised by Allegra Spender Source ↗

Affordability reforms fall short

Greater price transparency would not necessarily make specialist care affordable without wider changes to billing, Medicare rebates, insurer payouts, contracting and system oversight.

Raised by Monique Ryan, Sophie Scamps, Kate Chaney and Alison Penfold Source ↗

Recorded votes

Amendments at a glance

Amendments grouped by chamber. Where APH reports aggregate counts, the package card summarizes the matching public amendment sheets by source theme.

House

Defeated

Set deadlines for insurance-product decisions

Aye 10 No 71

Defeated 10 to 71. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, and Nationals.

25 June 2026

The House rejected the proposal, so the bill proceeded without these timeframe commitments.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 69
Independent 9 / 0
Greens 1 / 0
Liberal 0 / 1
Nationals 0 / 1
Defeated

Call for wider action on specialist costs

Aye 10 No 71

Defeated 10 to 71. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Liberal.

25 June 2026

The House rejected the proposal, so these additional affordability reforms were not added to its second-reading position.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 70
Independent 9 / 0
Greens 1 / 0
Liberal 0 / 1
Defeated

Publish richer medical cost and quality information

Aye 9 No 69

Defeated 9 to 69. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Nationals, and minor parties and independents.

25 June 2026

The House rejected the changes, leaving those publication and reporting details to the government's implementation process rather than specifying them in the bill.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 67
Independent 8 / 0
Greens 1 / 0
Nationals 0 / 1
Unknown 0 / 1
Carried

Government package: 9 amendments

Government amendments delay commencement to 18 September 2026, refine approved application periods and designated changes, and clarify how private health insurance rules apply to existing and new products.

25 June 2026

Passed on the voices

The chamber agreed to this amendment package without a counted vote. APH records the agreed count by amendment, while the source documents are grouped into amendment sheets.

Themes in the public amendment sheets

These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Mark Butler

Australian Labor Party • MP 12 Feb 2026

Butler supports the bill because it would help patients compare specialist fees and likely out-of-pocket costs, while preventing insurers from avoiding ministerial scrutiny by replacing products with costlier or less valuable versions.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead opposing voice Opposes

Allegra Spender

Independent • MP 25 Mar 2026

Spender opposes giving the bill a second reading despite supporting its transparency and oversight reforms, arguing that it needs clear, enforceable timeframes for decisions on insurance products so delays do not disadvantage consumers.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Monique Ryan

Independent • MP 25 Mar 2026

Ryan supports the bill as an important step toward transparent medical pricing and preventing private health insurance product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one., but argues that it will not make specialist care affordable without broader reforms to billing practices, Medicare rebates and workforce planning.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

Sophie Scamps

Independent • MP 25 Mar 2026

Scamps supports the bill because publishing clearer medical fee information and stopping product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one. are necessary consumer protections, but says broader reform is also needed, including an independent private health system authority, a minimum payout ratio and fairer contracting rules.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

22 speakers · 24 contributions · 22 support

  1. Renee Coffey Coffey supports the bill because it will give patients clearer information about specialist fees and likely out-of-pocket costs while stopping insurers from repackaging similar products at higher prices without proper scrutiny.
    “This bill legislates wider scrutiny of premiums so consumers can be more confident in the value of their private health insurance. This bill begins to put that right by giving patients better information when making decisions about specialist care, strengthening informed financial consent, closing a loophole that has undermined confidence in private health insurance and providing stronger safeguards against unregulated charging behaviour. It builds on the Albanese Labor government's broader work to strengthen Medicare, lower health costs and make our health system fairer for all Australians to navigate. For families across Griffith, that means better information, stronger protections and even more confidence in the choices before them.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 24 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Alice Jordan-Baird Jordan-Baird supports the bill because it will give consumers clearer information about specialist costs and stop private health insurers using new products to bypass premiumThe price charged for insurance. oversight.
    “Today I rise to support the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026, brought forward by the Minister for Health and Ageing, and I commend him for doing so. I'm so proud to be part of the Albanese Labor government as we remain resolute in our commitment to make quality health care accessible for every Australian.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Madonna Jarrett Jarrett supports the bill because it will give private health consumers clearer information about fees and out-of-pocket costs while preventing insurers from evading ministerial oversight through phoenixing.
    “With this bill, we're going further. We're protecting consumers who are under the private health insurance system as well because that is a key part of our healthcare system. We're providing greater transparency so that patients and people who need medical care can make informed decisions in relation to their health care. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Joanne Ryan Joanne Ryan supports the bill because it will help patients compare specialist fees and out-of-pocket costs, while stopping private insurers from evading scrutiny through product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one. and imposing steep premiumThe price charged for insurance. increases on vulnerable customers.
    “Like the member opposite who just spoke, I've also met with many constituents about the rising costs of private health care, private health insurance and seeing specialists. So I'm really pleased to stand today to support this legislation, because, like the actions that we have taken to strengthen Medicare and to breathe life back into our universal health system in communities like mine, I'm pleased that we are also reaching into this space, which is incredibly important.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Dan Repacholi Dan Repacholi supports the bill because it will give patients clearer information about specialist and out-of-pocket costs while closing private health insurance loopholes and strengthening oversight of premiums.
    “At the end of the day, that is what this is all about. It is about patients. It is about helping people get the care they need when they need it without unnecessary stress or confusion. That is something that everyone in this House should support, and I really hope those opposite get onboard and support this, because at the end of the day the people in the Hunter and the people all around Australia want to see us work together. They want an opposition that works with us in government so we can make Australia a better and fairer place. That is why this bill is so important and that is why I support this bill. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Louise Miller-Frost Miller-Frost supports the bill because it will give patients clearer information about specialist costs and prevent private health insurers from avoiding premiumThe price charged for insurance. controls through product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one..
    “Having worked in the sector for a couple of decades, I know how important our health system underpinned by Medicare is to the quality of life we enjoy as Australians. This government is acting to ensure that the health system continues to support the health of Australians. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Steve Georganas Georganas supports the bill because it will improve transparency about medical costs, help consumers compare care, and stop private health insurers replacing products with similar, more expensive ones to evade premiumThe price charged for insurance. scrutiny.
    “I rise to speak today on this very important bill. I support the introduction and passage of the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026. It is a very important bill when it comes to the transparency of our private health insurers. Improving transparency assists the consumer. It ensures that transparency is there, and it gives confidence in the system and confidence in the private health legislation area.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Luke Gosling Gosling supports the bill because it will help patients compare specialist costs, strengthen scrutiny of private health insurance premiums and prevent insurers from replacing products with similar, more expensive or less valuable ones without ministerial approvalFormal permission from the responsible minister..
    “The Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026 represents the first significant step in taking action to address the impact of specialist fee charging and the consequential out-of-pocket costs for consumers. It delivers on two election commitments: to expand ministerial scrutiny of premiums to provide assurance around the cost and value of private health insurance by driving more transparency on patient medical fees and a commitment to outlaw product phoenixing. The legislation further strengthens Medicare by helping Australians find the best value when they need specialist medical advice and treatment and provides more confidence in their private health insurance by outlawing, as I said, product phoenixing. It will enable Australians to make more informed decisions about their health care and private health insurance.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 24 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  9. Jo Briskey Briskey supports the bill because it will give patients clearer information about fees and likely out-of-pocket costs, strengthen scrutiny of private health insurance premiums and stop product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one..
    “Australians should not need to be experts in item numbers, gap schedules and the fine print to protect their families. They should not discover the true cost of care only after they've had to commit to it. They should not see their insurance product re-emerge under a new name at a higher price without proper scrutiny. This bill responds to those expectations. It complements Medicare's universal foundation by improving transparency and accountability in the private system. It empowers patients with clearer, comparable information. It strengthens consumer protection by ending product phoenixing and applying consistent oversight to meaningful changes in price and value, and it further embeds fairness in our healthcare system. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Mike Freelander Mike Freelander supports the bill because it will let patients find specialist fees before consultations or hospital stays and make private health insurance products more transparent.
    “This bill does increase transparency and it does mean costs will be findable by patients prior to their consultation or hospitalisation. It is really important that people do get that transparency so they can find out how much doctors will charge them and how much they will have to pay out of pocket. It is very important to understand that there are some procedures that we do now that weren't available in the time of the advent of Medicare. Because the rebates don't exactly fit the procedure, sometimes the costs are much higher than for the previous treatments. It is reasonable, though, that specialists make their fees available for patients.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  11. Claire Clutterham Claire Clutterham supports the bill because it will help consumers compare medical fees and out-of-pocket costs, strengthen ministerial oversight of private health insurance premiums, and prevent insurers from replacing products with similar but more expensive ones.
    “I rise to speak in support of the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026. There are two key purposes to this bill. Firstly, it amends the Health Insurance Act 1973 and the Private Health Insurance Act 2007 to allow the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing to publish information for consumers on medical fees charged by medical practitioners, including specialists and general practitioners, together with the likely out-of-pocket costs for their private healthcare experience. The purpose is to support greater transparency and healthcare pricing, helping consumers make informed decisions about their health care and obtain better value from private health insurers.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 24 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  12. David Smith David Smith supports the bill because it will publish specialists' fees and insurance gap information so patients can compare costs, while also preventing insurers from using product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one. to impose higher premiums.
    “We know that the cost of medical and hospital services is a key driver of health inflation for consumers, which ultimately feeds into higher out-of-pocket costs and higher private health insurance premiums. We know that fees can vary widely across specialists, even for the same procedure in the same part of Australia. And we know that this is hurting Australians. That is why we promised to address this issue, and that is why we are delivering on this promise and advocating the passing of this bill.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  13. Ali France Ali France strongly supports the bill because it will make specialist fees and out-of-pocket costs transparent, prevent insurers from replacing policies with more expensive or less generous near-identical products, and give consumers greater protection and choice.
    “This bill delivers on our promise to strengthen Medicare and to make private health insurance work better for those Australians who can afford to pay for it. It delivers real transparency in specialist fees, real protection against unfair premium hikes and real power for patients to make the best decisions for their families. We are fixing the $24 million—wishy washy, self-reporting, if you can be bothered—website that those opposite set up to track specialist fees. We are creating a system to ensure all healthcare providers and insurers are held accountable and act in the best interests of patients. We want to remove bill shock when it comes to health care. We want the light to shine in; the cost of health care should not be a mystery. We also need to ensure that our private and public health systems work together to continue to deliver the best health care in the world. I love this bill and I commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  14. Julie-Ann Campbell 2 contributions Campbell supports the bill because it will help patients compare specialist costs, close the product-phoenixing loophole and strengthen oversight of private health insurance premiums and coverage changes.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Julie-Ann Campbell on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Campbell supports the bill because it will help patients compare specialist costs, close the product-phoenixing loophole and strengthen oversight of private health insurance premiums and coverage changes.

    “This bill will ensure Australian patients have the power to compare costs and make informed choices about their own medical care, while not imposing any administrative burden on doctors. Specifically, the bill will amend the Health Insurance Act and the Private Health Insurance Act to allow for the publication of information about medical practitioners, including their names, their locations, their fees charged by location and their use of gap cover arrangements with insurers. It will also allow for publication of information about hospitals and insurers, including gap cover and contracting arrangements, and the proportion of policyholders experiencing various out-of-pocket costs. Consumer peak bodies and insurer bodies are highly supportive, given the growth in specialist fees and out-of-pocket costs and the rising costs of living.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Campbell argues that the bill addresses a serious transparency gap by helping private health consumers understand specialist medical costs before making an appointment, reducing financial risk for families under cost-of-living pressure.

    “In 2026, you can compare the prices of flights to London in seconds. You can research the price of second-hand cars within a 50-kilometre radius. You can check what your neighbour sold their house for last week. It is seamless, it is easy and it's at your fingertips. But when you need to see a medical specialist, when the stakes could not be higher, you are expected to make an appointment without knowing what it will cost you, without knowing the impact on your hip pocket and without knowing the price tag for your family. As families in my local community of Moreton face cost-of-living pressures, that information gap is not a minor inconvenience; it's a real financial risk.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  15. Tony Zappia Zappia supports the bill because publishing specialists' fees and insurers' out-of-pocket data will help patients compare affordable treatment options, put downward pressure on medical costs and stop insurers from phoenixing products.
    “In wrapping up, this legislation is good legislation. It provides information out there in the marketplace that people will access, and ultimately that will reduce the cost of health services for people who need them throughout this country. I commend the legislation to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  16. Cassandra Fernando Fernando supports the bill because it will publish specialist fees and out-of-pocket costs so patients can compare prices, while stopping private health insurers from relaunching nearly identical products at higher premiums to evade oversight.
    “This bill will close that loophole. It will outlaw the practice of product phoenixing, ensuring that insurers cannot bypass government oversight by gaming the system with technical restructures and product relaunches. If a premium increase is not approved, insurers will not be able to simply repackage the product and impose it anyway. This reform strengthens consumer protection, and it sends a clear message: transparency and fairness are not optional in Australia's health system. Labor believes that, whether you rely solely on Medicare or choose to take out private cover, you deserve honesty, accountability and respect. This bill delivers exactly that. By increasing transparency in pricing and expanding consumer protections, we are making sure the healthcare system continues to work for all Australians.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  17. Tracey Roberts Roberts strongly supports the bill because it will give patients clearer information about specialist costs and require greater scrutiny of new or reduced-value private health insurance products, helping prevent unexpected expenses and product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one..
    “This bill is about restoring confidence and fairness to that system. It aims to give patients clearer information and a fairer deal when they use private health care. It does that in two main ways: by fixing how specialist fees and out-of-pocket costs are published, and by tightening oversight of private health insurance premiums so insurers cannot dodge scrutiny through 'product phoenixing'.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  18. Trish Cook Cook supports the bill because it will give patients clearer information about specialist fees and stop insurers using product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one. to raise premiums without ministerial scrutiny.
    “In conclusion, this bill is a clear-eyed response to the cost-of-living pressures that are facing Australians. It empowers patients with data on specialist fees, protects consumers from corporate trickery and reinforces our longstanding commitment to a Medicare system that is strong and fair. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 24 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  19. Rowan Holzberger Holzberger supports the bill because it will stop insurers from manipulating products to raise premiums and improve transparency about specialist fees, helping consumers understand costs before treatment.
    “Again, this sits very much with the philosophy of this government, which is about real change—about actually making an impact where it needs to be made and not resting on our laurels. I commend the bill on the basis that this is going to fix this problem. It is going to save insurers from themselves, and it is going to mean that Australian consumers can get the insurance that they need at the cost that is fair and reasonable.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 24 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  20. Emma McBride McBride supports the bill because it will give consumers clearer information about specialist fees and out-of-pocket costs, protect them from private health insurance loopholes and help them make informed healthcare choices.
    “I rise today to speak in support of the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026. This bill is fundamentally about fairness. It is about making sure Australians can make informed decisions about their health care—decisions grounded in transparency, clarity and genuine choice. For too long, too many Australians have been left in the dark about the true costs of private medical treatment. This legislation changes that.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  21. Emma Comer Comer supports the bill because it will give private health consumers clearer information about fees, out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage while closing loopholes and avoiding new administrative burdens for doctors.
    “At its core, this legislation delivers on the Albanese government's commitment to strengthen Medicare while ensuring Australians who engage with the private health system are better informed, better protected and better supported. This reform is about giving Australians the information they need and closing the loopholes that undermine confidence in the system. Australians should not need to be health experts or to do hours of research to understand what they're being charged. They should not be left guessing about out-of-pocket costs or whether their insurance policy will actually deliver when they need it most. This bill is about fixing that. It is about enabling Australians to make informed decisions about their health care and their private health insurance.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

5 speakers · 5 support

  1. Alison Penfold Penfold supports the bill because it will improve medical price transparency and curb insurers' product phoenixingReplacing a policy with a similar, dearer one., but says the government should go further by requiring insurers to return 90 per cent of premiums as benefits and introducing a mandatory contracting code.
    “While I support this bill, I call on the minister to go further. Implement the necessary mechanisms to ensure health insurers pay their fair share by mandating a return to 90 per cent benefit ratios from annual premiums. I also urge the minister, for the sake of Australians, to seriously consider the need for a mandatory code of conduct in contracting between private health insurers and private hospitals.”

    National Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Anne Webster Webster supports greater transparency in medical pricing and measures to help consumers get better value from private health insurance, but says the bill requires careful scrutiny through a Senate inquiry.
    “The coalition supports ensuring greater transparency in healthcare pricing and the need to help consumers make informed decisions about their health care and obtain better value from private health insurance. To ensure we preserve Australia's private health system, the coalition believes the legislation requires careful scrutiny through a Senate inquiry. Labor's reckless spending and economic mismanagement is pushing up costs across the board, and health care is another victim of that.”

    National Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Andrew Wallace Wallace says the coalition will not oppose the bill because it supports greater fee transparency and closing premiumThe price charged for insurance. loopholes, but argues the current design is too broad and leaves serious operational and accountability questions unresolved.
    “We're not opposing this bill. We are doing what an opposition should do. We're insisting that legislation affecting 15 million Australians and the clinicians who serve them is properly designed before it becomes law. The government has had more than a year to work out the details of this policy. The fact that so many fundamental questions remain unanswered is not good enough. The coalition will strive to make this bill better.”

    Liberal National Party • MP • 24 June 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Michael McCormack McCormack says the coalition will support the bill because greater fee transparency and stronger oversight of insurance premiums will help consumers, while arguing that transparency alone will not solve healthcare affordability and access problems, especially in regional Australia.
    “The second change to which I referred broadly aligns with the current process for premium changes for existing products while enlarging ministerial oversight of premium setting of new private health insurance products. The change is attempting to address the risk of product phoenixing, where an existing insurance product can be closed and an identical or similar new product then opened at a higher premium, skirting and getting around the requirement for premium change approval. The coalition is not going to stand in the way of this, because what we want to see is people being able to access help, certainly in regional areas. Particularly at the moment, as the member for Mallee outlined, there are so many people who cannot access their health diagnosis. They cannot get to their doctors' appointments at the practice or the surgery simply because they can't afford to pay for the fuel—that's if they could even fill up their tank, because, at the moment, we've got a crisis.”

    National Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Melissa McIntosh McIntosh says the coalition will support the bill in the House because it backs greater price transparency and better value from private health insurance, but wants a Senate inquiry to examine possible unintended consequences and rising out-of-pocket costs that the bill will not address.
    “Australians deserve choice, quality and timely access to health care. The coalition support greater transparency and a strong private health system because we know that leads to better outcomes for our public hospitals and all Australian patients. However, changes to the regulation of private health insurance and specialists must be carefully examined to avoid unintended consequences for consumers, patients and the broader health system. For that reason, while the coalition will support this bill in the House we believe it must be subject to further scrutiny through a Senate inquiry. This inquiry must investigate the spiralling out-of-pocket healthcare costs being overseen by this government, which this bill will not address. It is time for the Prime Minister to stop waving around his Medicare card and start addressing the rising affordability issues facing Australian patients because of his government's economic mismanagement.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

4 speakers · 3 support · 1 oppose

  1. Kate Chaney Kate Chaney supports the bill as a necessary first step toward clearer medical costs and stronger oversight of private health premiums, but says it must be accompanied by fee monitoring, transparent review processes and broader affordability reforms.
    “These are sensible measures, and I'll support them, but they must be seen as the beginning, not the end, of the work that needs to be done. The government's argument for the bill is that informed consumers make better decisions. That's true, but information alone can cut both ways. When price information is published without context, we know that some providers simply increase their fees to match the market rate, and there's a persistent perception among some patients that a higher fee must mean higher quality care. Unless people can access better information about clinical outcomes, complication rates, readmission and wait times, we risk reinforcing this false choice. That's the last thing households facing cost-of-living pressures need. We must monitor, in real time, what happens after this information goes live. Are median fees rising? Are prices clustering at the top of the range? Are patients gravitating to higher priced practitioners without any evidence of better care? If so, the government must be ready to act, whether through enhanced quality reporting or targeted intervention.”

    Independent • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat