Defence and Veterans’ Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions)

Current status

This bill became law on Apr 1st, 2026.

Policy area

Defence & foreign affairs

What does this bill do?

Moves the commission’s old Defence ActAn existing law about the Australian Defence Force. This bill removes the old commissioner provisions from it. provisions into the new standalone scheme by repealing the former Defence ActAn existing law about the Australian Defence Force. This bill removes the old commissioner provisions from it. part when the new Act starts.

Why was it introduced?

The move from Defence ActAn existing law about the Australian Defence Force. This bill removes the old commissioner provisions from it. provisions to a new standalone Defence and Veterans’ Service CommissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. Act created transition gaps for existing commission work, records and information-sharing. This bill repeals the old provisions, carries existing matters into the new scheme, and lets archived records and protected intelligence information be handled under clear rules.

Broader context

A Defence and Veterans’ Service CommissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. already existed under Part VIIIE of the Defence ActAn existing law about the Australian Defence Force. This bill removes the old commissioner provisions from it., but the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide pushed the government to create a stronger standalone body to oversee suicide prevention and wellbeing reforms for serving and ex-serving ADF members. After the main 2025 bill set up that new scheme, this consequential billRules that update other laws and carry existing matters across when a new law starts. dealt with the practical changeover by repealing the old Defence ActAn existing law about the Australian Defence Force. This bill removes the old commissioner provisions from it. provisions, preserving existing work and records, and setting rules for archives and intelligence-sharing.

Key criticism

The main criticism was not that the transitional bill’s machinery was wrong, but that the broader commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. reforms had been delayed, initially mishandled and might still need tighter review and implementation discipline. Coalition speakers and some crossbench supporters backed passage, while warning the scheme would only matter if governments cooperate, implement recommendations and revisit problems early.

Who supported it?

Hon Matt Keogh MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in House 27 Nov 2025
Passed House 11 Feb 2026
Passed Senate 30 Mar 2026
Became law 01 Apr 2026

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 01 Apr 2026

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

Members called out ‘aye’ or ‘no’ — no individual votes were recorded.

Passage speed

125 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Moves the commission’s old Defence ActAn existing law about the Australian Defence Force. This bill removes the old commissioner provisions from it. provisions into the new standalone scheme by repealing the former Defence ActAn existing law about the Australian Defence Force. This bill removes the old commissioner provisions from it. part when the new Act starts.

  2. Lets archived commission records become publicly available under the Archives ActThe law that controls when Commonwealth records can be accessed by the public., even if the commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. had made a non-publication directionAn order that certain information must not be published or made public..

  3. Lets the intelligence watchdogAn oversight body that checks intelligence agencies and can share relevant information with the commissioner if protections are adequate. share relevant information with the commission when satisfied the commission can protect it properly.

  4. Keeps existing commission work, requests, reports, notices, warrants, staff arrangements and intelligence-handling arrangements running under the new law after the changeover.

  5. Allows the Minister to make extra transition rulesExtra rules made to manage the change from the old law to the new law, within limits set by the bill., but not to create offences, search powers, taxes, appropriations or direct text changes.

Show source excerpts
  1. At the same time as the Defence and Veterans’ Service Commissioner Act 2026 commences.
    Defence and Veterans’ Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2026 final Act text
  2. A non‑publication direction given by the Defence and Veterans’ Service Commissioner prohibiting the publication of any material does not apply to:
    Defence and Veterans’ Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2026 final Act text
  3. (1) An IGIS official may divulge or communicate information, or give documents, to an entrusted person if:
    Defence and Veterans’ Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2026 final Act text
  4. (2) The thing has effect, and may be dealt with, after the transition time as if it had been done at the initial time by or in relation to the Commission under the new Act.
    Defence and Veterans’ Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2026 final Act text
  5. (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, make rules prescribing matters:
    Defence and Veterans’ Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2026 final Act text

Broader context for this bill

A Defence and Veterans’ Service CommissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. already existed under Part VIIIE of the Defence ActAn existing law about the Australian Defence Force. This bill removes the old commissioner provisions from it., but the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide pushed the government to create a stronger standalone body to oversee suicide prevention and wellbeing reforms for serving and ex-serving ADF members. After the main 2025 bill set up that new scheme, this consequential billRules that update other laws and carry existing matters across when a new law starts. dealt with the practical changeover by repealing the old Defence ActAn existing law about the Australian Defence Force. This bill removes the old commissioner provisions from it. provisions, preserving existing work and records, and setting rules for archives and intelligence-sharing.

  1. 08 July 2021

    Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide begins

    The Governor-General issued Letters Patent establishing the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide, creating the process that later recommended a permanent oversight bodyAn oversight body that checks intelligence agencies and can share relevant information with the commissioner if protections are adequate..

    Defence and Veterans’ Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum ↗
  2. 13 Sept 2023

    Royal commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. criticises Defence over veteran suicides

    Australian Financial Review reporting said royal commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. Nick Kaldas had blasted Defence, reflecting the public pressure around the treatment of serving and ex-serving personnel.

    Australian Financial Review ↗
  3. 09 Sept 2024

    Royal Commission final report recommends a new oversight bodyAn oversight body that checks intelligence agencies and can share relevant information with the commissioner if protections are adequate.

    The final report recommended a new statutory entity to provide independent oversight and evidence-based advice to improve suicide prevention and wellbeing outcomes for ADF members and veterans.

    Defence and Veterans’ Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum ↗
  4. 27 Nov 2025

    Consequential billRules that update other laws and carry existing matters across when a new law starts. introduced for the commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. changeover

    The bill was introduced alongside the standalone Defence and Veterans’ Service CommissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. scheme to move existing Defence ActAn existing law about the Australian Defence Force. This bill removes the old commissioner provisions from it. arrangements into the new structure without disrupting current work.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  5. 30 Mar 2026

    Parliament passes the consequential billRules that update other laws and carry existing matters across when a new law starts.

    Both houses passed the bill, completing the legislative changeover arrangements for records, ongoing matters, staff, warrants and information-sharing under the new commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. scheme.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 27 Nov 2025

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 27 Nov 2025

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 11 Feb 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

House second reading agreed 11 Feb 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House third reading agreed 11 Feb 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 03 Mar 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 03 Mar 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 30 Mar 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate second reading agreed 30 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Committee of the Whole debate 30 Mar 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate third reading agreed 30 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Passed both houses 30 Mar 2026

Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.

Finally passed both Houses

Assent 01 Apr 2026

The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.

The main case against this bill

The main criticism was not that the transitional bill’s machinery was wrong, but that the broader commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. reforms had been delayed, initially mishandled and might still need tighter review and implementation discipline. Coalition speakers and some crossbench supporters backed passage, while warning the scheme would only matter if governments cooperate, implement recommendations and revisit problems early.

No party represented in the debate opposed the bill; criticism was mostly about process and implementation risk.

Delay and handling of the reform package

Several Coalition speakers argued the government had taken too long and had mishandled the path to establishing the independent Defence and Veterans’ Service CommissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme., even though they still supported passing the bill.

Raised by Phillip Thompson, Michael McCormack, Tom Venning and Andrew Hastie Source ↗

Need for further fine-tuning and earlier review

Some Coalition speakers supported the bill but said the framework may need further Senate scrutiny or a sooner first review, so any design problems are found before the commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme.’s work is weakened in practice.

Raised by Michael McCormack and Andrew Hastie Source ↗

Risk the commissioner’s recommendations are not acted on

A crossbench supporter warned the reform would only make a real difference if governments cooperate with the commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. and actually implement recommendations, reflecting concern that oversight alone may not fix entrenched failures.

Raised by Allegra Spender Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

11 Feb 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

30 Mar 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Matt Keogh

Australian Labor Party • MP 27 Nov 2025

Matt Keogh supports the bill and urges the House to pass it because it makes the consequential amendments needed to establish the Defence and Veterans' Service CommissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. and commission under standalone legislation.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Darren Chester

National Party • MP 11 Feb 2026

Chester says the coalition will back the bill because it supports creating an independent Defence and Veterans’ Service CommissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme., but it wants one amendment to make the commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme.’s first implementation review happen sooner for stronger accountability.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

Allegra Spender

Independent • MP 11 Feb 2026

Allegra Spender supports the bill because it creates an independent statutory commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. with real powers to oversee reform for defence personnel and veterans after repeated failures to act on past inquiries.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Alice Jordan-Baird

Australian Labor Party • MP 11 Feb 2026

Alice Jordan-Baird supports the bill and says it is a vital response to the royal commission because it creates a stronger, independent commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. to drive reform, improve accountability and help prevent veteran and defence suicide.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

12 speakers · 14 contributions · 12 support

  1. Luke Gosling Luke Gosling supports the bill and says it will strengthen the independence and powers of the Defence and Veterans' Service CommissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. to drive reform, improve suicide prevention and wellbeing outcomes, and better include veterans' families.
    “Having spoken about the independence of the commissioner and about families, I now want to go to ongoing reform. The commissioner is empowered to be an agent of change and improvement. Their functions would enable them, as an oversight body, to monitor, inquire into, report on and provide advice on systemic reforms, including the Commonwealth's implementation of the government's response to the recommendations of the royal commission. The government has listened to feedback from stakeholders and has taken action. These changes to the bill will ensure that the commissioner has the tools necessary to ensure that the Defence and Veterans' Service Commission is able to drive that systemic reform that will improve suicide prevention and wellbeing outcomes for both serving and ex-serving Australian Defence Force members. This will mean agencies are held accountable to consider and respond to the commissioner's recommendations. The enduring nature of the commission will ensure that the voices of our veterans continue to be heard and that systemic issues which contribute to suicide in our veteran community are continually reviewed and addressed.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Susan Templeman Susan Templeman supports the bill and says it should pass because it creates a strong, independent Defence and Veterans' Service CommissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. with the powers and transparency needed to drive reform, prevent suicide and improve wellbeing for serving and former ADF members and their families.
    “This bill delivers on the full implementation of these things by enshrining the legislative establishment of the Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner and the Defence and Veterans' Service commission into its own standalone legislation, as was always intended.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Jo Briskey Jo Briskey supports the bill and urges its passage, arguing it will give the Defence and Veterans' Service Commission the independence, powers and accountability needed to fix systemic failures linked to veteran suicide, while formally recognising veterans' families.
    “Most importantly, we are bringing the silent ranks—the families of those who serve—into the fold of our national policy. We're acknowledging that the ripples of service touch every partner, every parent and every child, and we're telling them: 'Your burden is seen, your role is recognised, and you'll not be left to carry it alone.' We stand on the shoulders of proud local legacy, but our duty is to the present and the future. We owe it to every person today who wears a uniform and to every veteran who has since laid it down to ensure that the promise of service is met with the promise of support. No veteran and no veteran's family should ever have to fight their hardest battle alone. With this bill, we are building a system that finally holds itself to the same high standard that they hold for themselves. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Meryl Swanson Meryl Swanson supports the bill and wants it passed because she says it gives the Defence and Veterans’ Service CommissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. the independence, powers and accountability needed to drive reform, prevent suicide and improve outcomes for veterans and their families.
    “The changes before the House today ensure the commissioner has the tools necessary to drive system reform and improve suicide prevention and wellbeing outcomes for serving and former serving Australian Defence Force members. This legislation will ensure agencies are held accountable to consider and respond to the commissioner's recommendations, and the enduring nature of the commission will ensure that the voices of veterans and their families continue to be heard after the headlines fade. Systemic issues that contribute to suicide in our veteran community cannot be addressed through one-off responses or short-term commitments. They require sustained attention, independent oversight and the courage to confront uncomfortable truths. This bill delivers exactly that.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Claire Clutterham Claire Clutterham supports the bill because she says it gives the Defence and Veterans' Service CommissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. the independence, powers and accountability mechanisms needed to drive reform and help prevent veteran and defence suicides.
    “The changes in this bill will ensure that the commissioner has the tools necessary so that the Defence and Veterans' Service Commission is enabled to drive system reform, to improve suicide prevention and wellbeing outcomes for serving and ex-serving Australian Defence Force members. Accountability, transparency and prompt action are facilitated by this bill, and it is our duty in this House to do this. It's not set-and-forget. We must monitor and measure the effectiveness of these measures and continually adapt, make changes and make improvements to ensure that the commission and the commissioner can always be a powerful force for the systematic change that we need. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Anthony Chisholm Chisholm supports the bill and says it completes the full, standalone legislative establishment of the Defence and Veterans' Service Commission to implement the royal commission's key recommendation and strengthen the commission's independence, powers and oversight role.
    “This Bill delivers on the full implementation of this by enshrining the legislative establishment of the Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner and Commission into its own stand alone legislation as always intended.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 03 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Steve Georganas Steve Georganas supports the bill and says it should pass because an independent Defence and Veterans' Service CommissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. is needed to drive reform, improve transparency and better protect serving personnel and veterans.
    “The commission has been up and running since September and has been overseeing the whole defence ecosystem; however, that's not enough. We need these bills to pass for our commitment to better the lives of ADF personnel and veterans. We need a commissioner to act in the best interest of veterans and those serving in an independent manner. We need to see proactive steps to prevent the ongoing trend of all the issues associated with veterans when they leave the Defence Force and whilst they're in the Defence Force as well as all the things that we heard during the royal commission.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Ali France Ali France supports the bill and says it is a significant reform to give independent oversight of the defence and veterans system after the royal commission exposed deep failures.
    “By establishing the independent Defence and Veterans' Service Commission, we are taking a significant step toward a future where veterans and their families are supported by a system that is worthy of their service; a future where their wellbeing is protected, their voices are central and their experiences shape the policies that affect them; and a future where no veteran or serving defence personnel feel left behind. I commend the bills to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  9. Emma Comer 2 contributions Emma Comer supports the bill and wants it passed because she says it gives the Defence and Veterans' Service Commission a stronger, more independent legal basis to drive lasting reform, accountability and better suicide prevention for defence personnel, veterans and their families.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Emma Comer on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Emma Comer supports the bill and wants it passed because she says it gives the Defence and Veterans' Service Commission a stronger, more independent legal basis to drive lasting reform, accountability and better suicide prevention for defence personnel, veterans and their families.

    “I'm honoured to speak in support of the Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner Bill 2025 and the Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025. Together they represent an important step in strengthening the independence, authority and effectiveness of the Defence and Veterans' Service Commission and the Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner. They reflect the government's commitment to ensuring that the system reform across the defence and veterans system is enduring, transparent and accountable, and that it has sustained focus on suicide prevention and wellbeing outcomes.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Emma Comer supports the bill and says it should pass because it gives the Defence and Veterans' Service Commission stronger independence, accountability powers and long-term oversight to help prevent suicide and improve outcomes for serving and ex-serving ADF members and their families.

    “The commission will have a dedicated and sustained focus on suicide prevention. It will ensure that agencies responsible for implementing the royal commission's recommendations are held to account. It will promote long-term cultural and structural change and drive the reforms necessary to reduce the rates of suicide and suicidality among serving and ex-serving ADF members. To perform this role effectively, the commission must have the independence, functions and powers necessary to meet these objectives and to maintain the trust of the Defence and veteran community. That is precisely what this bill delivers.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  10. Jenny McAllister McAllister backs the bill and says it should pass because it strengthens the new Defence and Veterans’ Service Commission, responds to Senate inquiry feedback, and improves independence, protections and transparency for veterans and their families.
    “These bills before us are a direct result of that engagement. We seek to demonstrate our commitment to working with the defence and veteran community. We want to get this right. The bills address the first recommendation of the Senate inquiry by establishing standalone legislation for the commission. The bills also add a specific reference to families as part of the commissioner's functions, strengthen the commissioner's independence and powers, improve witness protections and increase transparency.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

10 speakers · 10 support

  1. Michael McCormack McCormack says the coalition will support the bill because an independent statutory commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. is needed to deliver the royal commission's reforms for veterans.
    “Parliament was asked to wade through a complex oversight body with very limited visibility and limited stakeholder engagement, and that is not how serious veterans policy should be made. It is not. So I would urge and encourage that we ensure we take the time with this commission and with this bill. I know it will pass this place; it's got the support of the coalition. But we also need to ensure that, if there are any fine-tuning legislative measures that may happen in the house of review, in the Senate, in the upper house, then there's the time taken to do that as well.”

    National Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Phillip Thompson Thompson says the coalition will support the bill because an independent defence and veterans commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. is needed to drive reform and accountability after systemic failures linked to veteran suicide.
    “The structure Labor is now implementing closely mirrors what the coalition proposed after having voted against it. It is fair to say that if the coalition's national commissioner model had been supported instead of opposed, independent oversight would already be mature and operating. The coalition will support this framework now because veterans and their families cannot afford further delay, but the history should be acknowledged. Labor put politics ahead of veteran wellbeing five years ago and is finally delivering on the commission. Later today, I'll be moving an amendment to this bill. I will speak to that later.”

    Liberal National Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Tom Venning Venning says the coalition will support these bills to create an independent watchdog for veterans, arguing that permanent outside oversight is needed after the royal commission found the system was failing veterans and families.
    “However, it is important to put something on the record. This idea of an independent oversight body is not an invention of the Labor Party. In fact, the coalition introduced legislation to establish an independent national commissioner for defence and veteran suicide prevention back in 2020, five years ago. That bill proposed an independent statutory oversight body with basically the same features Labor is implementing today. And what did Labor do in 2020? They opposed that bill. Because of Labor's political games, the establishment of the body was delayed—and that delay matters. It matters because early independent oversight, working alongside the royal commission, could have accelerated system reform. It could have brought earlier accountability to Defence and the DVA. The structure Labor is now implementing closely mirrors what the coalition proposed at the very same time Labor voted against that bill. The coalition will support this framework because veterans and families cannot afford any further delay, but the history should be acknowledged: Labor put politics ahead of veterans' wellbeing five years ago.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Melissa Price Price says the coalition will support the bill because it creates the independent oversight bodyAn oversight body that checks intelligence agencies and can share relevant information with the commissioner if protections are adequate. recommended by the royal commission, but she argues Labor delayed and mishandled the reform and wants an amendment to require an earlier implementation review.
    “The coalition's objective is simple—reforms recommended by the royal commission must be implemented quickly and assessed openly. The opposition's commitment to veterans will remain unwavering. When in government, our minister for veterans' affairs was given cabinet status. Disappointingly, in the current Labor government, the responsible minister has not been. That is a clear indication of how Labor views veterans and their families. The coalition's track record on veterans' affairs speaks for itself. We will continue to support and advocate for veterans and their families because that is what those who serve their country deserve the most. The coalition will support this bill with our amendment. I thank the House.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Andrew Hastie Hastie says the coalition will support the bill because it creates the independent oversight bodyAn oversight body that checks intelligence agencies and can share relevant information with the commissioner if protections are adequate. recommended by the royal commission, but he argues Labor delayed and mishandled the process and says the first review should happen sooner.
    “I also want to make the point here that this is not a new idea from Labor. The coalition introduced legislation to establish an independent National Commissioner for Defence and Veteran Suicide Prevention back in 2020, more than five years ago. That bill proposed an independent statutory oversight body with the same structural features now being implemented. I want to note in the House that Labor opposed that legislation at the time for political purposes, and, as a result, the establishment of an independent statutory oversight body was delayed. The structure that Labor is now implementing closely mirrors what we proposed back in government. If the coalition's national commissioner model had been supported instead of being opposed by Labor, independent oversight would already be underway. The coalition will support this framework now, because veterans and families cannot afford further delay, but I think it's important that that history should be acknowledged, particularly in the veteran community. Veteran care should not be a political issue. I think it's fair to say that where we land today is bipartisan, but it hasn't been perfect. But we're here, and I think we've come together for veterans and their families, and that's an important message they need to hear from this House.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Tim Wilson Tim Wilson supports the bill, saying it is an important way to honour veterans and improve support for their mental health, wellbeing and post-service lives.
    “This bill to me is a fundamental proposition about how we show, honour and respect our veterans and how there is nearly no end to the responsibility we share to invest in our veterans so they can live out the best of their healthy lives. For those people who make that sacrifice and are prepared to wear the uniform and defend our nation, what we should want at the end of their service is not just to provide them with the support they need to move on from their service. Of course, in many cases, we want them to continue to act as reservists continuing to support the ADF. But we should also want those who cease their service to go on and live healthy and productive lives. By 'healthy and productive lives' we don't mean just keeping them alive; we mean healthy and productive lives where they form families and live out what they deserve as a consequence of their service. It's what they fought or enlisted for. I'm very happy to be supporting the principles of this process and this legislation, because I think it goes right to the heart of the responsibility, particularly of those who have not worn a uniform, to those who are prepared to step up and do so.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Susan McDonald McDonald says the coalition will support the bill because veterans and their families need an independent oversight bodyAn oversight body that checks intelligence agencies and can share relevant information with the commissioner if protections are adequate. without further delay, but she criticises Labor for previously blocking a similar model and argues the reporting timetable should be faster.
    “What is now before the parliament, the Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner Bill 2025 and the Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025, closely resembles the model the coalition proposed and the government opposed. If that earlier proposal had been supported, we would already have a mature, independent oversight body operating within the system today. The coalition will support this framework because veterans and their families cannot afford further delay; however, history should not be overlooked. It's a matter of record that Labor put political consideration ahead of early reform and is now delivering a model that it once rejected.”

    National Party • Senator • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Paul Scarr Scarr supports the bill and says it is a much improved and effective scheme to create an independent commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. for veterans, especially because the commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. can launch inquiries independently and compel evidence.
    “The last comment I want to make is on the importance, from my perspective, of this new commissioner's power to establish an inquiry on their own initiative into matters relating to suicide prevention or wellbeing outcomes for veterans. From my perspective, it is absolutely crucial that the commissioner not be hamstrung, not be limited and not have guardrails erected around their discretion with respect to embarking upon their own inquiry and examination into matters of concern with respect to suicide and suicidality among our veterans. That is incredibly important. When you dovetail that power with the commissioner's independence from the department and from the minister and consider the powers the commissioner will have with respect to witness protection and compelling access to evidence, I think this is a really good scheme. It's an effective scheme. As Senator McDonald has advocated, we should accelerate the reporting dates in relation to the work of the commissioner and the implementation of the royal commission's recommendations. I fully support that as well. Our veterans deserve nothing less than this legislation.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  9. Andrew McLachlan McLachlan supports the bills and wants them passed because he says the new commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. will improve accountability and the treatment of veterans and their families.
    “But I'll leave this on a positive note. We have arrived at a place where we have a commissioner that will continue to shed light on how we treat veterans in the service, how we discharge them and how we give them care for the remainder of their days. Long gone are the days when we could hold the view that, once they're discharged, they are someone else's problem. We have a moral obligation to care for them, to watch over them and to meet their needs every single day for the rest of their lives. I thank the government for pursuing this legislation, I thank all my colleagues for their great work in committee and I look forward to these bills' passage through this house, their proclamation and their coming into life.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Greens

1 speaker · 1 support

  1. David Shoebridge David Shoebridge says the Greens will support the bill because it creates the genuinely independent Defence and Veterans’ Service CommissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. recommended by the royal commission, while criticising the government’s earlier rushed and inadequate approach and backing stronger reporting amendments.
    “I rise on behalf of the Greens to indicate that we'll be supporting the Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner Bill 2025 and to deal briefly with the history of why we're here. We're here because the royal commission made a finding that veterans and people serving in the ADF are at significant risk, and at significant risk to their mental health. There have been appalling rates of suicide and self-harm in our defence forces and our veterans community. One of the core recommendations from the royal commission was that there needs to be an independent commissioner—independent of Defence, independent of the minister—to ensure that there is somewhere to go, for veterans, their families, members of the ADF, and that there would be that independent, ongoing oversight of any reforms that this parliament makes to try to change the structures in the ADF to make it a safer place, especially for women but not just women: for people serving in the ADF.”

    Australian Greens • Senator • 30 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

2 speakers · 2 support

  1. Kate Chaney Kate Chaney supports the bill and says it delivers an important Royal Commission recommendation by creating an independent commissionerThe independent officer who deals with matters about Defence and veteran service under the new scheme. with real authority to drive accountability and reform for Defence personnel, veterans and their families.
    “I welcome these bills, and I hope the establishment of an independent commissioner will lead to tangible improvements in the health, wellbeing and lives of current and former ADF personnel and their families. They deserve a system that supports them with consistency, compassion and integrity.”

    Independent • MP • 11 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat