Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures)

Current status

This bill became law on Apr 8th, 2026.

Policy area

Budget, tax & economy

What does this bill do?

The law bans life insurers from using certain genetic test information to decide whether to offer life insurance, or what terms and conditions to offer.

Why was it introduced?

Australians were delaying or forgoing genetic testing because life insurers could use genetic test results in underwriting. The bill bans that use to reduce those concerns and encourage testing.

Broader context

Australia’s life insurance industry introduced a partial moratorium in 2019 after a parliamentary inquiry raised concerns that genetic test results were deterring people from getting tested. Treasury then found the problem was still affecting uptake, and the government turned its 2024 ban announcement into this bill to make the protection permanent in law.

Key criticism

The main criticism was that the bill leaves too much for later review or regulation, with some members warning about insurer workarounds, a five-year review window, and delegated powers that could modify key definitions. The concerns came mainly from crossbench amendments and the Senate scrutiny committee, while broader support for the ban remained intact.

Who supported it?

The Labor government introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in House 26 Nov 2025
Passed House 25 Mar 2026
Passed Senate 01 Apr 2026
Became law 08 Apr 2026

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 08 Apr 2026

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

2 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Passage speed

126 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. The law bans life insurers from using certain genetic test information to decide whether to offer life insurance, or what terms and conditions to offer. Breaches can lead to criminal and civil penalties, ASICThe Australian Securities and Investments Commission, which enforces parts of Australia’s corporate and financial services law. will enforce the ban, and disability discrimination law is updated to match.

  2. A key goal is to reassure people that having genetic testing, including for health research, should not hurt their access to life insurance. The government says this should encourage more testing and support health and scientific benefits.

  3. The law also gives some foreign financial services providers clearer pathways to operate in Australia. It creates three exemptions from needing an Australian financial services licence and speeds up licensing for some providers already regulated in comparable overseas systems.

  4. The law further updates the framework for how Australia meets its financial obligations to multilateral development banks and the IMFThe International Monetary Fund, a global institution that lends to countries and supports financial stability.. It introduces standing appropriations for current and future obligations and aims to cut administrative burden.

Show source excerpts
  1. Schedule 1 to the Bill amends the ICA 1984 to establish a ban which prohibits insurers from using certain information about an individual’s genetic testing to inform the offer of life insurance cover, or the terms and conditions of the cover that is offered. Contravention of the ban will be subject to a criminal offence and civil penalty provision, with ASIC assigned regulatory responsibility for monitoring and enforcing the ban. The DDA 1992 is also amended to align Australia’s anti-discrimination law with the ban.
    Explanatory memorandum
  2. The objective of the amendments is to provide certainty to individuals that undertaking genetic testing, including through participation in health or medical research, will not impact their ability to obtain life insurance cover, or the terms and conditions of that cover. It is intended that this will lead to the uptake of genetic testing and therefore provide extensive individual, public health and scientific benefits.
    Explanatory memorandum
  3. Schedule 2 to the Bill supports the participation of foreign financial services providers in Australia by providing regulatory certainty through establishing three exemptions from the requirement to hold an AFS licence – the professional investor exemption, the comparable regulator exemption and the market maker exemption. Schedule 2 to the Bill also fast-tracks the process for foreign financial services providers that apply for an AFS licence by exempting them from the fit and proper person test if they are authorised to provide financial services in a comparable overseas regulatory regime.
    Explanatory memorandum
  4. Schedule 3 to the Bill streamlines and modernises the legislative framework under which Australia fulfils its financial obligations to MDBs and the IMF. The amendments introduce special appropriations to support all current and future financial obligations Australia has with MDBs and make other amendments to reduce future administrative burden.
    Explanatory memorandum

Broader context for this bill

Australia’s life insurance industry introduced a partial moratorium in 2019 after a parliamentary inquiry raised concerns that genetic test results were deterring people from getting tested. Treasury then found the problem was still affecting uptake, and the government turned its 2024 ban announcement into this bill to make the protection permanent in law.

  1. 01 July 2019

    Industry moratorium begins

    After a parliamentary inquiry into life insurance, the industry introduced a partial moratorium on using genetic test results in underwriting.

    Explanatory memorandum ↗
  2. 01 Nov 2023

    Treasury opens consultation

    Treasury asked the public in 2023 how insurers using genetic test results was affecting genetic testing and research participation.

    Explanatory memorandum ↗
  3. 01 Sept 2024

    Government announces full ban

    In September 2024 the government said it would ban life insurers from requesting or using adverse genetic test results and put ASICThe Australian Securities and Investments Commission, which enforces parts of Australia’s corporate and financial services law. in charge of enforcement.

    Explanatory memorandum ↗
  4. 26 Nov 2025

    Bill introduced to Parliament

    The Albanese Government introduced the bill to turn the promised ban into law and stop life insurers using adverse genetic testing information in underwriting.

    Treasury Ministers ↗
  5. 26 Nov 2025

    Testing concerns persist

    By 2025 Treasury said Australians were still delaying or skipping genetic testing because of life insurance worries.

    Explanatory memorandum ↗
  6. 01 Apr 2026

    Parliament passes ban

    Parliament passed the bill in 2026, clearing the way for the new genetic testing protections to take effect.

    Treasury Ministers ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 26 Nov 2025

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 26 Nov 2025

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Scrutiny of Bills review: raised delegation of legislative powers and parliamentary scrutiny 04 Feb 2026

Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills considered the bill in Scrutiny Digest 2 of 2026 on 04/02/2026. It raised delegation of legislative powers and parliamentary scrutiny issues, including delegated legislation modifying or exempting primary legislation (henry viii).

Considered in published report

Scrutiny Digest 2 of 2026
Economics report 26 Feb 2026

The Senate Economics Legislation CommitteeA Senate committee that examines Treasury bills and takes submissions before reporting to Parliament. inquired into the bill and reported on its four schedules, covering limits on life insurers’ use of genetic information, foreign financial services licensing exemptions, multilateral development bank amendments, and repeal of Stage 2 financial adviser registration. The report focused mainly on human rights issues, finding that Schedules 1 and 2 may limit rights but in a way described as reasonable and proportionate, while Schedules 3 and 4 were said not to raise human rights issues.

Referred; report published

Committee report (26 Feb 2026)
Second reading debate 23 Mar 2026

Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.

Second reading debate 25 Mar 2026

Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.

House second reading agreed 25 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Consideration in detail debate 25 Mar 2026
House third reading agreed 25 Mar 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 25 Mar 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 25 Mar 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Senate second reading agreed 01 Apr 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Senate third reading agreed 01 Apr 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

The main case against this bill

The main criticism was that the bill leaves too much for later review or regulation, with some members warning about insurer workarounds, a five-year review window, and delegated powers that could modify key definitions. The concerns came mainly from crossbench amendments and the Senate scrutiny committee, while broader support for the ban remained intact.

Criticism was narrow and focused on safeguards.

Review too slow

The bill was criticised for waiting five years before the mandatory review, with an amendment seeking a three-year review instead.

Raised by Monique Ryan Source ↗

Definitions too flexible

One amendment sought to stop regulations from overriding the bill’s definitions of genetic testing and protected genetic information.

Raised by Sophie Scamps Source ↗

Too much delegated power

The scrutiny committee raised concerns about delegated legislation modifying primary law and weakening parliamentary scrutiny.

Raised by Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

25 Mar 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

01 Apr 2026

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Amendments at a glance

Recorded amendment and procedural votes grouped by chamber. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.

House

Defeated

Require genetic insurance ban reviews every three years

Aye 10 No 66

Moved by Monique Ryan (Crossbench). Defeated 10 to 66. Support came from Centre Alliance, Greens, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Liberal.

25 Mar 2026

Defeat kept the bill's five-year review timetable unchanged.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 65
Independent 8 / 0
Centre Alliance 1 / 0
Liberal 0 / 1
Greens 1 / 0
Defeated

Stop regulations overriding protected genetic information definitions

Aye 9 No 64

Defeated 9 to 64. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Liberal.

25 Mar 2026

Defeat left key definitions alterable through regulations.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 63
Independent 8 / 0
Liberal 0 / 1
Greens 1 / 0

This list includes amendment votes, procedural votes and votes on the bill itself.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Daniel Mulino

Labor • MP 26 Nov 2025

Mulino supports the bill, arguing it will ban life insurers from using genetic testing information so Australians are not deterred from potentially life-saving tests, while also making other Treasury law changes on foreign financial service provider relief, multilateral development bank and IMFThe International Monetary Fund, a global institution that lends to countries and supports financial stability. arrangements, and financial adviser registration.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Monique Ryan

Independent • MP 23 Mar 2026

Monique Ryan supports the bill as a long-overdue reform to stop life insurers discriminating on the basis of genetic test results, arguing it will remove a major barrier to people accessing genetic testing and better health care.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

Sophie Scamps

Independent • MP 23 Mar 2026

Sophie Scamps supports the bill, arguing it is urgently needed to end genetic discrimination in life insurance, remove a barrier to genetic testing and restore fairness and trust.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Renee Coffey

Labor • MP 23 Mar 2026

Coffey supports the bill, arguing it will stop life insurers from using adverse genetic test results, align insurance and anti-discrimination law, and encourage Australians to pursue genetic testing and research without fear of financial penalty.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

25 speakers · 29 contributions · 25 support

  1. Hill Julian Hill strongly supports the bill, arguing that banning the use of genetic test results in life insurance will end unfair discrimination and remove a barrier that has discouraged people from genetic testing and medical research.
    “Mr HILL (Bruce—Assistant Minister for Citizenship, Customs and Multicultural Affairs and Assistant Minister for International Education) (19:12): Thank you, Deputy Speaker. I am very eager to speak on this bill. I strongly support the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025, which will ban the use of genetic test results in life insurance.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Gregg Matt Gregg supports the bill, arguing that banning life insurers from using adverse genetic test results will remove a major barrier to life-saving testing and research while preserving risk rating through use of symptoms, diagnoses and family history.
    “In conclusion, all parts of this bill are important, but, most importantly, we're removing the barrier for vulnerable Australians seeking more information about their own health. This is good for those individuals, good for our healthcare system and good for our society. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Witty Sarah Witty strongly supports the bill, arguing that it will end genetic discrimination in life insurance, encourage preventive testing and medical research, and deliver sensible reforms across financial services and international development finance.
    “We promised to ban the use of adverse genetic test results in life insurance. We are delivering on that promise. This parliament has a choice. We can cling to outdated frameworks that force people into silence or hesitation, or we can embrace a future where science advances, prevention expands and fairness underpins our laws. For the people of Melbourne, for families across this country, for every young person considering a test that could change their future, I know whose side I am on. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Repacholi Dan Repacholi supports the bill, arguing it will stop life insurers from using genetic test results against Australians, remove a barrier to life-saving testing and research, and deliver practical reforms across financial services and international financial legislation.
    “Mr REPACHOLI (Hunter) (18:42): I rise to speak on the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025. This is an important bill. It's a bill about fairness, it's a bill about trust and, above all, it's a bill about making sure Australians can make decisions about their health without fear. At its heart, this legislation delivers on a clear commitment. We said we would stop life insurers from using genetic testing results against Australians. This bill does exactly that. Genetic testing saves lives. It allows doctors to identify serious risks early. It allows people to take preventive action. It allows families to understand their health and plan for the future as well. But, for too long, Australians have faced an unacceptable choice: do they take a genetic test that could protect their health, or do they avoid testing because they're worried it will affect their ability to get life insurance? That's not a choice anyone should have to make.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Garland Garland strongly supports the bill, arguing it is an overdue fairness reform that will stop life insurers from using genetic test results against applicants and remove a barrier to potentially life-saving testing.
    “I commend the bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Jordan-Baird Alice Jordan-Baird strongly supports the bill, arguing it will stop life insurers from using genetic test results against applicants and remove a major barrier preventing Australians from accessing potentially life-saving preventive testing and treatment.
    “Ms JORDAN-BAIRD (Gorton) (17:10): Today I rise to support the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025, which was introduced by the Assistant Treasurer, and I commend him for doing so. This amendment to the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 is a significant one because genetic testing can save lives. Genetic testing supports medical practitioners to prevent illnesses, diagnose conditions earlier, and treat and monitor a range of cancers, cancer predisposition syndromes and other heritable conditions sooner. It plays a critical role in monitoring all of this. For many Australians, one major thing has stood in the way of getting tested for and treating conditions early, and that's the concern that life insurers will use that information against them. That's not right—and, what's more, it takes one easy fix, and that fix is this bill in front of us.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Freelander Freelander strongly supports the bill, arguing it will ban the use of adverse genetic test results in life insurance, reduce fear that deters people from testing, and improve access to early treatment, research participation and fairer health outcomes.
    “Across the parliament there's pretty uniform agreement on this legislation, and this is something the whole parliament can be congratulated on. It's one of the most important pieces of legislation to pass through this parliament in the 10 years I've been here; I really do feel that. This will open the way for further advances in health care based on genomics that we know will be coming towards us as a tsunami in the next few years. The people that have promoted this bill—I'll mention Jane Tiller again, from Monash University, and Stephen Jones, Daniel Mulino and many other members of parliament that we've heard speak—need to be proud of the fact that this parliament is looking to the future in health care by introducing this legislation. I congratulate my paediatric colleague Monique Ryan, who's here today, who I know has also been a very strong supporter of this legislation, as have many other members of parliament—too many to mention.”

    Labor • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Laxale Jerome Laxale strongly supports the bill, arguing it will stop life insurers using genetic test results against applicants, remove a major barrier to life-saving testing and research, and improve fairness and health outcomes.
    “Amendments like these are what good governments do. It has been a long journey to get here but one that this government—starting under former assistant treasurer Jones and now introduced into the House by the Assistant Treasurer—is doing in consultation with advocates, insurers and the health community. This legislation will fix problems, remove barriers, back Australians to look after their own health and encourage them to do so. Australians should never have to choose between their health and their financial security, and with this legislation—when it passes through this parliament—they'll no longer have to. I commend it to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  9. French Tom French supports the bill, arguing it will stop life insurers from using predictive genetic test information in underwriting and replace the current industry moratorium with enforceable legal protections.
    “Mr FRENCH (Moore) (18:29): I rise to speak in support of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025. This is a bill about fairness, about modern medicine and about ensuring that Australians are not punished for taking responsibility for their own health.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Holzberger Rowan Holzberger supports the bill, arguing that insurers should be barred from using genetic test results to deny cover and that strong penalties will give people confidence to seek diagnoses and targeted treatments.
    “I rise in support of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  11. Miller-Frost Louise Miller-Frost supports the bill, arguing it will stop life insurers from using adverse genetic test results to deny cover or raise premiums and will encourage Australians to pursue potentially life-saving genetic testing and research participation.
    “It's an amendment that has been a decade in the making. I again pay particular tribute to Dr Jane Tiller, whose tireless campaigning over the last few years has now seen deserved success. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  12. Doyle Mary Doyle strongly supports the bill, arguing it will end genetic discrimination in life insurance, improve access to genetic testing and medical research, and also deliver sensible financial services, international finance and regulatory reforms.
    “This bill is about fairness in health, confidence in financial markets, modernisation of international engagement and sensible regulatory reform. This bill means greater confidence for people to pursue genetic testing without fear, stronger access to global investment opportunities, responsible participation in international financial institutions and reduced regulatory burden where it does not serve consumers. Our government is getting on with the job—removing barriers, modernising systems and putting Australians first. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  13. Campbell Campbell strongly supports the bill, arguing it will stop life insurers from using adverse genetic test results, remove a barrier to life-saving testing, and deliver other practical financial regulatory reforms.
    “For years, advocates have campaigned for this change. Researchers have documented the harm of the status quo. That's why the status quo is changing today. Families have had to make difficult decisions about their health because of the fear of financial penalties, and this government is delivering the protections people were promised and fixing a problem that those opposite ignored for a decade. Medical practice is moving forward in leaps and in bounds. The law must keep pace, and, with this bill, it will. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  14. Cook Kara Cook strongly supports the bill, drawing on her own experience with melanoma and genetic testing to argue that Australians should not face life insurance discrimination for seeking potentially life-saving health information.
    “That is why I rise today to support the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  15. Byrnes Alison Byrnes clearly supports the bill, arguing that it will end unfair genetic discrimination in life insurance, improve access to preventive healthcare and research, and provide enforceable protections while preserving legitimate insurance risk assessment.
    “This bill delivers that. It delivers on a clear commitment, it ends a longstanding inequity, and it ensures that Australians no longer have to choose between their health and their financial security. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  16. Keogh Keogh strongly supports the bill, arguing it will stop life insurers from using adverse genetic test results to deny or price cover, encourage people to undertake potentially life-saving testing and research, and strengthen protections through antidiscrimination law and ASICThe Australian Securities and Investments Commission, which enforces parts of Australia’s corporate and financial services law. enforcement.
    “This bill does many other things in other schedules. I support all of them, and I commend the bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  17. Lawrence Lawrence argues the bill is necessary to stop life insurers using adverse genetic test results in ways that deter Australians from potentially life-saving testing and research participation.
    “I spoke about the changes being based squarely on the evidence of harm created by the current laws. This legislation also reflects something fundamental about fairness. Fairness is at the heart of Labor policy. Australians believe in a fair go. They believe that people should not be penalised for taking responsible steps to protect their health. I agree, and I commend the bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  18. Cook Trish Cook strongly supports the bill, arguing that it will end genetic discrimination in life insurance, encourage preventive health and medical research, and modernise several areas of financial regulation.
    “In conclusion, it's people over products. As a nurse, I've always believed that prevention is better than cure. As a PhD candidate, I understand that the data tells us the same thing. And, as the member for Bullwinkel, I know my community expects us to put health ahead of insurance industry loopholes. For 10 years, those opposite ignored the genetic underclass. They allowed this system to persist, where Australians were punished for being proactive about their health. The Labor Albanese government is fixing that. We're telling every Australian: your DNA belongs to you, not your insurer. We are choosing science, we are choosing prevention and we are choosing people. I commend this bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  19. Zappia Tony Zappia supports the bill, especially its ban on life insurers using genetic test results, arguing it will stop discrimination, encourage potentially life-saving testing, and improve national health outcomes.
    “I thank the minister who's at the table for his role in bringing this to the parliament. I also thank the previous minister, who did a lot of the groundwork on it as well, because, as the member for Macarthur said, this has been an effort of so many people to bring it to the parliament. As the member for Macarthur quite rightly points out, this is important legislation, and I commend it to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  20. Abdo 2 contributions Abdo supports the bill, arguing that voluntary industry self-regulation has failed and that banning life insurers from using predictive genetic test results is necessary to stop discrimination and remove a deterrent to potentially lifesaving testing.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Abdo on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    BILLS - Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025 - Second Reading Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Basem Abdo supports the bill, especially schedule 1, arguing it is a fairness reform that will stop life insurers using genetic test results to discriminate and remove a deterrent to life-saving genetic testing. He says evidence from research, consultation and stakeholder concerns shows the current voluntary approach has not adequately protected Australians.

    “Mr ABDO (Calwell) (19:24): I was really enjoying the assistant minister's contribution, so apologies for taking up some of his time. I rise to speak in support of this bill and particularly the reforms contained in schedule 1, which will prohibit life insurers from using genetic test results to discriminate against Australians seeking life insurance. At its heart, this reform is about something very simple. It's about fairness. Australians believe deeply in the idea of a fair go. We believe people should not be penalised for things beyond their control. We believe that the benefits of modern science should improve lives, not create new barriers or new forms of discrimination.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    BILLS - Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025 - Second Reading Labor • MP • 24 Mar 2026

    Abdo supports the bill, arguing that voluntary industry self-regulation has failed and that banning life insurers from using predictive genetic test results is necessary to stop discrimination and remove a deterrent to potentially lifesaving testing. He says the bill provides enforceable protections while also modernising parts of the financial regulatory framework through its other schedules.

    “It is for those reasons that I commend this bill to the House.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  21. Leigh Leigh argues that the bill will stop life insurers from discriminating against Australians based on genetic test results, reducing fear that testing for health reasons will jeopardise access to affordable cover.
    “We are acting on behalf of vulnerable Australians. The most affluent can get away without buying life insurance, but vulnerable Australians often feel a need to purchase life insurance in order to forestall the risk that their family are left adversely affected by the economic consequences of their death. This bill will ensure a greater sense of equity and protect some of the most vulnerable in our community. It will be good for medical research, and that is why it enjoys the backing of so many medical research companies. It will be good for health, which is why it enjoys the backing of so many medical advocacy bodies, such as the Australian Medical Association and the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. It will bring peace of mind to Australians who want to go and find out more about their genetic history, either through curious inquiry or because they are keen to see what genetic testing reveals about them and how they can help their own health and that of their families. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Labor • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  22. McCarthy The minister supports the bill, saying it will ban life insurers from using individuals' genetic testing information and thereby remove a barrier to life-saving genetic testing.
    “By putting this ban in place, we will remove this barrier, so more Australians will access genetic testing and in turn, its full benefits for patients, public health and medical research can be delivered.”

    Labor • Senator • 25 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  23. Georganas Steve Georganas strongly supports the bill, arguing it is long overdue and will protect people from being disadvantaged in life insurance and other financial products because they undergo genetic testing.
    “Mr GEORGANAS (Adelaide) (19:23): I rise to support this bill. I'm very proud to support the introduction and implementation of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025. It is very long overdue. Together with members on this side, I stand very proudly in support of stronger protections for people undergoing genetic testing, and ensuring that any genetic testing that's done will not be detrimental in terms of other financial products or insurances that they wish to purchase to protect their lives—something to protect the family with, in case there's a death—or protecting the costs that are incurred with health insurance. That's why this particular bill is very important. We need to ensure that we have measures in place that give stronger protection to people undergoing genetic testing.”

    Labor • MP • 24 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

5 speakers · 5 support

  1. Webster Webster supports the bill’s genetic testing protections, arguing they will remove a major barrier to preventive genetic screening and save lives, especially in regional Australia.
    “There has long been broad agreement and support for this ban on life insurers using genetic testing to refuse cover, and it is disappointing that Australians have faced delays due to the incompetence of this government. This is an egregious example of the Albanese government's focus on announcements and grandstanding rather than the follow-through. Dr Jane Tiller from Monash University has been campaigning for a ban for almost a decade. With strong bipartisan support and no opposition, there is no reason why this legislation should not have been introduced to parliament sooner, as promised by the government. I am grateful—on behalf of all Australians, but especially regional Australians—that this bill is now before us, and I look forward to seeing the passage and implementation of this legislation in practice.”

    Nationals • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Wilson Wilson supports the bill, arguing it is important to stop discrimination based on genetic testing in life insurance and to improve certainty and health outcomes.
    “We're supporting this bill because it doesn't actually entrench that power. We're supporting this bill because we actually believe that Australians should be empowered to live out their best lives. We're supporting this bill because we believe that life insurance should be there to pool capital and to mitigate risk and that people shouldn't be discriminated against based on their pre-existing or genetic conditions that are factors beyond themselves. But, more importantly, we're supporting this bill because we desperately want to give a reprieve to those financial advisers out there that Labor would actually really deep down like to outlaw and just throw into industry super funds. We're supporting them to be able to give financial advice to Australians. So, whether you're wealthy or you're just starting out on the ladder of opportunity, you can afford financial advice. So you can be in a position to make strategic decisions for your long-term future. And, most importantly, so that Australians can get ahead, so they don't go on then and just get financial advice from those whose recommendation is, 'Throw your money into funds the Labor Party owns so they can use it for marketing expenses and so they can campaign to sit in this chamber so they can then pass laws and appropriation bills to hand money to organised crime through the CFMEU-Labor cartel.'”

    Liberal • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. McCormack McCormack supports the bill, saying it delivers overdue protections against genetic discrimination in life insurance and other useful reforms, while arguing Labor delayed bringing it forward.
    “This bill supports better health outcomes, and that's why the coalition backs it.”

    Nationals • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Aldred Mary Aldred says the coalition supports the bill because it provides long-awaited protections against genetic discrimination in life insurance and will let Australians pursue genetic testing without fear of losing cover.
    “I commend brave people like Meg for sharing their stories so vulnerably and so charitably. I commend researchers and advocates like Dr Jane Tiller. I think it is a great moment for this parliament at a time where we quite rightly have a very robust contest of ideas on a number of contentious issues—and this place should be a place of strong debate. But I think there are some topics where the community and the broader public want to see us come together as a parliament to champion an issue and to progress a cause that is worthy of support, and this bill does just that. I'm very pleased to be part of a coalition who has had a strong track record of supporting this issue, and I'm very pleased to commend this bill to the House.”

    Liberal • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Hogan Kevin Hogan says the coalition will support the bill, backing its genetic testing protections, foreign financial service provider relief and measures to meet international obligations.
    “The coalition is going to support the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill because it contains important reforms that Australians have been waiting for, including sensible protections around the use of genetic information in life insurance and improvements across our financial system.”

    Nationals • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

One Nation

1 speaker · 1 unclear

  1. Joyce Barnaby Joyce argued that genetic testing should not be used by insurers to exclude people with higher health risks and warned more broadly against prenatal sex selection and other eugenic uses of genetic testing.
    “This study by Edith Cowan University has brought once more to light the whole gamut of this new world we're in with genetic testing. Genetic testing has to have some ring-roads put around it. If it doesn't, it will become incredibly Orwellian in terms of the type of world that we want to create. Of course, the attributes being tested for don't stop with people's predisposition for wanting male children, because that's where it generally moves towards—male. It also comes to other attributes that people wish to select for, and they can do it by genetic testing. They can do it for eye colour. They can do it for height. They can do it for whether a person has the propensity to become obese. All these things become part of this rather dark and perverse new form of eugenics in trying to create a new form of humankind—one that fits our ideal model for what we believe to be the perfect human being. It's completely wrong. It's a very bad thing.”

    One Nation • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

5 speakers · 7 contributions · 5 support

  1. Steggall Steggall supports the bill as a necessary legislative ban on genetic discrimination in life insurance, arguing it will improve fairness, public trust and access to preventive care while replacing inadequate industry self-regulation.
    “I welcome this bill and I urge the government to continue ensuring that discrimination when it comes to life insurance is addressed in all its forms.”

    Independent • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Spender Allegra Spender clearly supports the bill, highlighting its overdue protections against life insurers using genetic test results and welcoming schedules that ease market-maker licensing uncertainty and remove duplicated red tape for financial advisers.
    “But to be honest, we have been slow to act on this. In 2003, the Australian Law Reform Commission first recommended that the life insurance industry needed safeguards around the use of genetic testing—that is, 23 years ago. In 2018, a joint parliamentary inquiry into the life insurance industry recommended a moratorium on the use of genetic testing results in life insurance. In 2019, the life insurance industry introduced a partial industry-led moratorium to set policy limits. While I commend the industry for taking the first step, it's overdue that Australia committed to the change. I wrote to the Assistant Treasurer about this issue back in 2023 and again in 2025, when I was contacted by members of my community and also by others, particularly Dr Jane Tiller from Monash University, who has been a leading light in this area. I think the point is that we have come to the right conclusion. I welcome this bill. I support this bill, and I would also say that parliament needs to work at a greater speed than we currently do when issues are raised with us over a long period of time. I also recognise the Council of Australian Life Insurance, CALI, for getting behind some of these changes. It is really important that the life insurance industry is working with these changes as opposed to trying to fight them.”

    Independent • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Chaney Chaney supports schedule 1 of the bill, which would ban life insurers from requesting or using predictive genetic test results, replacing the voluntary moratorium with enforceable legal protections.
    “Schedule 1 is a sensible, proportionate reform that strengthens privacy, supports public health and removes the barrier to early diagnosis and prevention. It shows that when parliament listens carefully, works collaboratively and follows the evidence, we can deliver reforms that make a real difference to people's lives. I commend the government for bringing this forward, and I commend schedule 1 of the bill to the House.”

    Independent • MP • 23 Mar 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat