Broad agent and commission rules
Julian Leeser argued that proposed education-agent definitions and commission-information rules could be broad, difficult to administer and possibly drive up commissions, and said these issues needed more scrutiny.
This bill became law on Dec 4th, 2025.
Education & skills
The Act changes education, overseas-student and family-assistance laws.
The bill was introduced as a package of education integrity, access and information reforms. The government linked the overseas-student measures to integrity problems identified in the Parkinson migration review, the Nixon rapid review and the Migration Strategy, especially collusive practices between some providers and education agents. It also introduced the First Nations medical-student measure to respond to the Universities Accord recommendation to uncap medical Commonwealth supported places, and introduced early childhood education and care measures so the Commonwealth could collect better cost, financial and provider information for future subsidy and service-delivery reforms.
The Act sits at the intersection of migration integrity, international education regulation, First Nations health workforce policy and early childhood education reform. The government presented it as the next step after migration-system reviews found integrity problems in international education, while the Opposition supported several goals but argued that some powers needed stronger safeguards and committee scrutiny. The Senate ultimately added Opposition safeguards and review requirements before the bill passed.
The main criticisms in the collected debate were not objections to every part of the bill. Julian Leeser, speaking for the Opposition in the House, accepted that the bill addressed real policy areas but argued that several powers were broad, under-explained or insufficiently scrutinised. Greens amendments in the Senate also criticised the treatment of international students and called for free education and lower visa fees.
Jason Clare, Minister for Education introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 04 Dec 2025
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
3 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
56 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
The Act changes education, overseas-student and family-assistance laws. Its main purposes are to strengthen integrity in international education, expand access to medical Commonwealth supported places for First Nations students, and improve early childhood education and care data and subsidy administration.
For international education, the Act defines education agents and education-agent commissions, expands fit-and-proper checks for providers, lets the Department of Education collect and share commission information, and gives ministers powers to pause some provider-registration and course-addition applications.
It also requires some prospective overseas-student providers to first deliver domestic courses for two years, allows automatic cancellation where providers have not delivered courses to overseas students for 12 consecutive months, and creates powers to suspend or cancel specified courses with systemic quality or public-interest concerns.
For offshore higher education, the Act requires Australian higher education providers to obtain TEQSAThe Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency, Australia's national higher education regulator. The Act gives TEQSA an authorisation role for Australian higher education delivered offshore. authorisation before offering or conferring Australian awards for offshore courses, and to notify and report to TEQSAThe Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency, Australia's national higher education regulator. The Act gives TEQSA an authorisation role for Australian higher education delivered offshore. about offshore delivery arrangements.
For First Nations medical students, the Act removes the cap on Commonwealth supported places in medicine so eligible Indigenous students who meet entry requirements can be enrolled in a Commonwealth supported placeA subsidised university place where the Commonwealth pays part of the cost and the student pays the rest. The Act uncaps medical Commonwealth supported places for eligible First Nations students. from 2026.
For early childhood education and care, the Act lets the Secretary compel some corporate childcare providers to provide cost and financial information for the Early Education Service Delivery Prices ProjectA Department of Education project to collect cost and financial information about early childhood education and care services so future reforms can be based on service-delivery costs., expands use and publication of protected provider information, and aligns retrospective Child Care SubsidyThe Commonwealth payment that helps eligible families with childcare costs. The Act changes some reconciliation date rules for subsidy entitlement and eligibility decisions. reconciliation dates with the subsidy system.
The Senate amended the bill before final passage. The final Act includes an independent review of the Schedule 1 education and overseas-student changes within two years, extra safeguards for childcare cost-data notices and course-cancellation powers, a two-year sunset for the childcare cost-data powers, and some narrower application rules.
The Bill amends Education portfolio Acts to strengthen the quality, integrity and sustainability of the delivery of education in Australia, and improve equity and access in higher education, particularly for First Nations peoples.Education Legislation Amendment (Integrity and Other Measures) explanatory memorandum
Parts 1 to 8 of Schedule 1 to the Bill amend the ESOS Act to support the quality, integrity and sustainable growth of the international education sector.Education Legislation Amendment (Integrity and Other Measures) explanatory memorandum
requiring providers, prior to applying for registration of courses under the ESOS Act, to deliver one or more courses exclusively to domestic students ... for consecutive study periods totalling two (2) years; enabling the automatic cancellation ... where courses have not been delivered to overseas students for 12 consecutive months.Education Legislation Amendment (Integrity and Other Measures) explanatory memorandum
Part 9 of Schedule 1 to the Bill amends the TEQSA Act to support greater regulatory oversight of the delivery of higher education courses offshore by Australian education providers.Education Legislation Amendment (Integrity and Other Measures) explanatory memorandum
Part 10 of Schedule 1 to the Bill amends the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (HESA) to uncap places in medical courses for First Nations students so that all First Nations students who meet the entry requirements to enrol in courses in medicine can be enrolled in a Commonwealth supported place.Education Legislation Amendment (Integrity and Other Measures) explanatory memorandum
The Bill amends the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999 ... to support the collection of data for the Early Education Service Delivery Prices project ... strengthen the integrity of current ECEC data governance arrangements ... ensure the date of effect for decisions relating to the CCS reconciliation process ... align with the date of effect in the CCS system.Education Legislation Amendment (Integrity and Other Measures) explanatory memorandum
4 Review of operation of amendments made by Schedule 1 ... The persons conducting the review must complete the review before the end of the period of 2 years starting on the day this section commences.Education Legislation Amendment (Integrity and Other Measures) Bill 2025 as passed
Context
The Act sits at the intersection of migration integrity, international education regulation, First Nations health workforce policy and early childhood education reform. The government presented it as the next step after migration-system reviews found integrity problems in international education, while the Opposition supported several goals but argued that some powers needed stronger safeguards and committee scrutiny. The Senate ultimately added Opposition safeguards and review requirements before the bill passed.
Parkinson migration review begins integrity work
Jason Clare said the government announced the Parkinson review of the migration system in September 2022, and later used migration-integrity findings as part of the case for this bill.
Ministerial second-reading speech ↗Nixon review identifies visa exploitation risks
The minister said the Nixon rapid review into exploitation of Australia's visa system identified integrity issues in international education, including problems involving some education agents and providers.
Ministerial second-reading speech ↗Universities Accord backs First Nations medical places
The explanatory memorandum says the Universities Accord recommended places for all First Nations students who apply and meet entry requirements for a medical degree.
Explanatory memorandum ↗Government funds childcare price data project
The minister said the 2024 mid-year budget update committed $10.4 million over two years for the Early Education Service Delivery Prices ProjectA Department of Education project to collect cost and financial information about early childhood education and care services so future reforms can be based on service-delivery costs., which the bill gives legislative support.
Ministerial second-reading speech ↗Government introduces integrity and access bill
Jason Clare introduced the bill, describing it as a package to strengthen international education integrity, uncap First Nations medical places and improve early childhood education data and subsidy administration.
Ministerial second-reading speech ↗Senate committee receives the bill
APH notes record referral to the Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee, with a committee report due on 24 November 2025.
APH bill page notes ↗Senate adds safeguards and defeats other amendments
The Senate agreed to 12 Opposition amendments on voices, defeated Greens and Coalition amendment packages in counted divisions, and passed the amended bill.
Senate Journal and divisions ↗Education integrity Act receives assentThe formal approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. This bill received Royal Assent on 4 December 2025.
The Act received Royal AssentThe formal approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. This bill received Royal Assent on 4 December 2025. on 4 December 2025 and commenced the next day.
Federal Register of Legislation and APH progress table ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The APH bill page records consideration by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights in Report 6 of 2025.
Considered by scrutiny committee
APH bill page notesThe APH bill page records consideration by the Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills in Scrutiny Digest 6 of 2025.
Considered by scrutiny committee
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Reported from Federation Chamber
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber. Later message exchanges with the other chamber were still recorded afterwards.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was referred to the Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee, which reported on 24 November 2025.
Referred to committee
APH bill page notesThe bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Third reading agreed to :
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form. The main amendments were: The enacted changes added a two-year independent review of Schedule 1, safeguards for childcare cost-data notices and course-cancellation powers, a two-year sunset for the childcare cost-data powers, a prospective limit on education-agent commissionMoney or non-monetary benefits given to an education agent or associate in connection with recruiting or assisting overseas students. information requests, and exemptions for registered higher education providers and TAFEs from a new ESOS course-registration requirement.
Consideration of Senate message
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. This bill received Royal Assent on 4 December 2025., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
The main criticisms in the collected debate were not objections to every part of the bill. Julian Leeser, speaking for the Opposition in the House, accepted that the bill addressed real policy areas but argued that several powers were broad, under-explained or insufficiently scrutinised. Greens amendments in the Senate also criticised the treatment of international students and called for free education and lower visa fees.
These are arguments recorded in debate and amendment text, not findings by this page. The Senate later agreed to 12 Opposition amendments, while defeating the Greens second-reading amendment and two other counted amendment packages.
Broad agent and commission rules
Julian Leeser argued that proposed education-agent definitions and commission-information rules could be broad, difficult to administer and possibly drive up commissions, and said these issues needed more scrutiny.
Ministerial course-cancellation powers
Leeser described the ministerial power to suspend or cancel classes of courses as very large, potentially duplicative of regulators and a possible source of administrative-law litigation.
Childcare pricing and publication powers
Leeser said the childcare pricing project raised questions about who would be targeted, who would receive information and whether publishing information could send pricing signals.
International-student treatment
The Greens second-reading amendment argued that international students had been scapegoated for housing problems, treated as revenue sources and should receive more support and lower visa application fees.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.
House
The House agreed to the amendments made by the Senate, so the bill could pass both chambers in the same form.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Senate
Moved by Mehreen Faruqi (Australian Greens). Defeated 12 to 30. Support came from Greens and Australia's Voice. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, and One Nation. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
Its defeat left the second-reading motion unchanged before the Senate agreed to the bill in principle.
Moved by The Hon Sarah Henderson (Liberal Party of Australia). Defeated 3 to 36. Support came from One Nation. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. 2 cross-floor votes were recorded: The Hon Sarah Henderson (Liberal Party) and Jacinta Nampijinpa Price (Liberal Party). Liberal Party had split recorded votes.
Its defeat kept those proposed international-student controls out of the bill.
Moved by Mehreen Faruqi (Australian Greens). Defeated 13 to 25. Support came from Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, and One Nation.
Its defeat left the bill's non-disallowanceA parliamentary process that can cancel some legislative instruments after they are made. A defeated Greens amendment would have made several ministerial pause powers subject to that process. settings for those ministerial pause powers in place.
The Senate agreed to 12 Opposition amendments adding a Schedule 1 review, extra safeguards, a two-year sunset and narrower application rules.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.
The parliamentary record also shows 12 Opposition amendments agreed without a counted division.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Jason Clare said the bill would strengthen integrity in international education, uncap Commonwealth supported medical places for Indigenous students, and improve early childhood education and care data collection and subsidy administration.
Read in Hansard ↗Julian Leeser said the bill dealt with international education, Indigenous medical places, offshore higher education and childcare pricing information, but argued several powers needed closer scrutiny through a Senate inquiry.
Read in Hansard ↗Tim Ayres moved the second reading in the Senate and incorporated the government speech, presenting the bill as an integrity, access and data-improvement package across education, overseas students and family assistance.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
2 speakers · 2 support
“This Bill makes a number of changes to improve integrity, improve access and improve the information we collect about the education system.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill makes a number of changes to improve integrity, improve access and improve the information we collect about the education system.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 mixed
“This is why we are seeking to have this bill sent to the Senate committee for a short Senate inquiry - in order to unpack and scrutinise the measures in this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Reported from Federation Chamber
Reported from Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Amendments considered
Amendment packages agreed
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
House · Consideration of Senate message
House agreed to Senate amendments
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. This bill received Royal Assent on 4 December 2025., turning the bill into an Act.
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights
Considered by scrutiny committee
The APH bill page records consideration by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights in Report 6 of 2025.
Considered by scrutiny committee (29 Oct 2025): Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights; Report 6 of 2025
APH bill page notesSenate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills
Considered by scrutiny committee
The APH bill page records consideration by the Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills in Scrutiny Digest 6 of 2025.
Considered by scrutiny committee (29 Oct 2025): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 6 of 2025
APH bill page notesSenate Education and Employment Legislation Committee
Referred to committee
The bill was referred to the Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee, which reported on 24 November 2025.
Referred to Committee (30 Oct 2025): Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (24 Nov 2025)
APH bill page notes