Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards)

Current status

This bill is currently before Parliament.

Policy area

Transport & communications

What does this bill do?

Phone and internet providers must register before selling services to the public.

Why was it introduced?

The government said there was no complete list of an estimated 1,500 phone and internet providers, making education and enforcement harder. Anika Wells (Labor) pointed to misleading broadband claims affecting nearly 9,000 Belong customers and improper Optus sales to hundreds of consumers. She said the existing two-step system delayed the Australian Communications and Media AuthorityThe federal regulator for telecommunications and media., the telecommunications regulator, while a $250,000 maximum penalty could be treated as a business expense.

Broader context

Telecommunications regulation already set consumer-protection rules, but ACMA lacked a comprehensive list of providers and could not act directly on a registered industry-code breach: it first had to warn or direct a provider to comply. Consumer advocates called for stronger powers, and the government responded with a registration scheme, direct code enforcement and tougher penalties; after Hon Anika Wells MP introduced the bill on 28 August 2025, the House passed it on 14 May 2026 and it was introduced in the next chamber on 22 June 2026.

Key criticism

Melissa McIntosh (Liberal) said providers were concerned about registration paperwork, especially for smaller operators, and whether they could properly appeal a refusal. Anne Webster (Nationals) argued the bill was not a full review of consumer protections. She said the government was three months late responding to a regional telecommunications report containing 14 recommendations. McIntosh also argued the bill did not address lost or weaker coverage following the 3G network closure.

Who supported it?

Hon Anika Wells MP introduced this bill. Supportive speeches so far have come from Labor, Liberal Party, Nationals, Liberal, some crossbench members.

Introduced in House 28 Aug 2025
Passed House 14 May 2026
At second reading in Senate 22 June 2026
Not yet law

Did it become law?

Not yet

Final passage

Recorded vote so far

1 recorded amendment or procedural vote was found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Days since introduction

344 days

Updated 07 Aug 2026.

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Phone and internet providers must register before selling services to the public. Network owners and wholesalers must not supply providers that should be registered but are not.

  2. Customers gain protection from providers that pose a serious risk. The Australian Communications and Media AuthorityThe federal regulator for telecommunications and media., the telecommunications regulator, can refuse or cancel their registration.

  3. Customers of a provider that loses registration must be told and transferred to another registered provider.

  4. Phone and internet providers must follow registered industry rules from the outset. The regulator no longer needs to warn them before taking enforcement action.

  5. Companies that break key rules face a maximum court penalty of 30,300 penalty units, up from $250,000 to $9.999 million when drafted.

  6. Companies can face an even larger penalty based on three times their benefit or 30% of turnoverThe value of a company's sales over a set period. when that benefit cannot be calculated.

  7. Companies receiving regulator-issued fines can face different amounts based on their size. These fines are capped at 20% of the matching maximum court penalty.

Show source excerpts
  1. 4 Section 85 • A carriage service provider is a person who supplies, or proposes to supply, certain carriage services. • Certain carriage service providers (known as registrable carriage service providers) must not provide listed carriage services unless they are registered under Division 3A. • Carriers and wholesale carriage service providers must not provide listed carriage services to registrable carriage service providers who are not registered. 5 After Division 3 of Part 4 96A Requirement for registrable carriage service providers to be registered (1) A registrable carriage service
    Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) introduced text
  2. 96E Registration of carriage service providers (1) This section applies if the ACMA receives an application by a registrable carriage service provider under section 96C to be registered under this Division. ACMA’s decision on application (2) The ACMA must register the applicant, unless the ACMA is satisfied that: (a) a ground for refusal specified in subsection (3) exists in relation to the applicant; and (b) the existence of that ground justifies refusing to register the applicant. Note: A decision to refuse registration as a registered carriage service provider is reviewable (see secti
    Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) introduced text
  3. 96P Notice and transfer of customers following renewal refusal or revocation (1) If the registration of a registered carriage service provider is not renewed under section 96H or is revoked under section 96L or 96N, the provider must: (a) give written notice of the expiry or revocation of the registration to the following: (i) all the customers of the provider; (ii) if the provider supplies a listed carriage service to another carriage service provider—the other carriage service provider; (iii) if the provider is supplied a listed carriage service by a carrier—the carrier; (iv) if the pr
    Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) introduced text
  4. 4 Section 106 • Compliance with industry standards is mandatory. • Compliance with industry codes and industry standards is mandatory. 5 Section 121 Repeal the section, substitute: 121 Compliance with industry codes (1) If an industry code that applies to participants in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, the telemarketing industry or the fax marketing industry is registered under this Part, each participant in that section of the industry must comply with the code. (2) A person must not: (a) aid, abet, counsel or procure a contravention of subsection (1); or (b)
    Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) introduced text
  5. 4 After paragraph 570(3)(a) (aaaa) in the case of a contravention of a civil penalty provision mentioned in subsection (3A)—the amount under subsection (3B) for each contravention; or 5 After subsection 570(3) (3A) For the purposes of paragraph (3)(aaaa), the civil penalty provisions are as follows: (a) subsection 101(1) or (2), to the extent that the contravention consists of a breach of a service provider rule set out in a provision of a determination in force under section 99; (b) subsection 121(1) or (2); (c) subsection 128(1) or (2). (3B) For the purposes of paragraph (3)(aaaa), th
    Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) introduced text
  6. (3B) For the purposes of paragraph (3)(aaaa), the amount under this subsection is an amount not more than the greatest of the following: (a) 30,300 penalty units; (b) if the Court can determine the value of the benefit that the body corporate, and any related body corporate (within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001), have obtained directly or indirectly and that is reasonably attributable to the conduct constituting the contravention—3 times the value of that benefit; (c) if the Court cannot determine the value of that benefit—30% of the adjusted turnover of the body corporate during
    Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) introduced text
  7. 1 Paragraph 572G(2)(a) Omit “section 68 or 101”, substitute “a particular civil penalty provision”. 2 After subsection 572G(2) (2A) Without limiting subsection (2), or subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, the determination may make different provision in relation to contraventions by different classes of bodies corporate. 3 Subsection 572G(3) Repeal the subsection, substitute: (3) The number of penalty units specified in the determination for a particular kind of contravention must not exceed: (a) if the maximum pecuniary penalty that could be imposed under section 570
    Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) introduced text

Broader context for this bill

Telecommunications regulation already set consumer-protection rules, but ACMA lacked a comprehensive list of providers and could not act directly on a registered industry-code breach: it first had to warn or direct a provider to comply. Consumer advocates called for stronger powers, and the government responded with a registration scheme, direct code enforcement and tougher penalties; after Hon Anika Wells MP introduced the bill on 28 August 2025, the House passed it on 14 May 2026 and it was introduced in the next chamber on 22 June 2026.

  1. 03 June 2024

    Earlier consumer-safeguards law comes into force

    The Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards and Other Measures) Act 2024 came into force, forming part of the existing safeguards regime that the 2025 bill sought to strengthen.

    ACCC ↗
  2. 28 Aug 2025

    Hon Anika Wells MP introduces the bill

    The bill responded to the absence of a comprehensive provider list and ACMA's inability to enforce registered industry codes directly without first issuing a warning or compliance direction.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  3. 04 Sept 2025

    Consumer advocates call for stronger telco enforcement

    ACCAN welcomed the bill's return and said stronger regulator powers and penalties were long overdue for dealing with telcos that caused consumer harm.

    Hansard ↗
  4. 14 May 2026

    House passes the bill

    Second and third reading were agreed to, completing the bill's passage through the House of Representatives.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  5. 22 June 2026

    Bill introduced in the Senate

    The bill was read a first time in the next chamber, continuing consideration after its passage through the House.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 28 Aug 2025

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 28 Aug 2025

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 04 Sept 2025

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Scrutiny of Bills review 04 Sept 2025

Considered by scrutiny committee (04/09/2025): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 5 of 2025

Scrutiny Digest 5 of 2025

APH bill page notes
Second reading debate 09 Feb 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate 01 Apr 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate 13 May 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate 14 May 2026

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

House second reading agreed 14 May 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House third reading agreed 14 May 2026

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 22 June 2026

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 22 June 2026

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

The main case against this bill

Melissa McIntosh (Liberal) said providers were concerned about registration paperwork, especially for smaller operators, and whether they could properly appeal a refusal. Anne Webster (Nationals) argued the bill was not a full review of consumer protections. She said the government was three months late responding to a regional telecommunications report containing 14 recommendations. McIntosh also argued the bill did not address lost or weaker coverage following the 3G network closure.

These speakers supported the bill despite their criticisms. McIntosh said ministerial assurances had addressed the registration concerns without changing the bill, while Webster called it a step in the right direction.

Late introduction risked passage

The government was criticised for introducing the reforms so close to the end of the parliamentary term that they might not become law before the election.

Raised by Coalition MPs Aaron Violi and Melissa McIntosh Source ↗

Recorded votes

Amendments at a glance

Recorded amendment and procedural votes grouped by chamber. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.

House

Defeated

Condemn the government's handling of regional telecommunications

Aye 42 No 96

Defeated 42 to 96. Support came from Liberal, Nationals, Greens, and Centre Alliance. Opposition came from Labor. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

14 May 2026

The House rejected the statement 42 votes to 96, then agreed to the bill's second reading without adding these criticisms and calls for action.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 91
Liberal 25 / 0
Nationals 11 / 0
Independent 3 / 5
Greens 1 / 0
Centre Alliance 1 / 0
One Nation 1 / 0

Did not vote: Liberal Party, LNP, Nationals

These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Anika Wells

Australian Labor Party • MP 28 Aug 2025

Wells urges passage of the bill to protect telecommunications customers by sharply increasing penalties for misconduct, allowing faster regulatory enforcement and establishing a provider registration scheme.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Tim Wilson

Liberal Party • MP 04 Sept 2025

Tim Wilson says the opposition will support the bill because consumers need enforceable telecommunications standards and safeguards, but warns that the government must not use telecommunications powers to censor or silence lawful views.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

Andrew Gee

Independent • MP 04 Sept 2025

Andrew Gee supports the bill because it will help hold telecommunications companies accountable, while urging the government to overhaul the ineffective Mobile Black Spot Program and improve coverage in regional communities.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Unclear

Tim Ayres

Australian Labor Party • Senator 22 June 2026

Ayres does not address the telecommunications consumer safeguards bill in the supplied speech, so his position on it is unclear.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

31 speakers · 37 contributions · 30 support · 1 unclear

  1. Matt Burnell 2 contributions Matt Burnell supports the bill because it strengthens consumer protections by giving the communications regulator immediate enforcement powers, requiring provider registration and imposing much larger, scalable penalties on telecommunications companies that breach their obligations.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Matt Burnell on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 26 Mar 2025

    Matt Burnell supports the bill because it strengthens consumer protections by giving the communications regulator immediate enforcement powers, requiring provider registration and imposing much larger, scalable penalties on telecommunications companies that breach their obligations.

    “Before I close, I want to say to every single constituent in my electorate of Spence and beyond, for that matter, that, if you are having difficulties with your telecommunication provider, if you've got issues with reception or if you are struggling with paying your bills and you don't know who to reach out to, a great first place to reach out to is your local federal member. We are here to help you. I encourage you to, please, pick up the phone, come into my office and sit down, and we'll do everything we can to get you on the right track. I commend this bill to the House.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 04 Sept 2025

    Matt Burnell supports the bill because it gives the communications regulator stronger enforcement powers, makes compliance with industry codes mandatory and introduces substantial penalties to deter misconduct and protect consumers.

    “The Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 achieves this in two ways. Firstly, it equips the government with greater authority via the Australian Communications and Media Authority to take swift action against telcos that breach their existing obligations. Secondly, it strengthens the penalty framework, ensuring appropriate consequences when a telco missteps while also encouraging companies to prevent such conduct from occurring in the first place. This bill is both reactive, providing a strong and meaningful mechanism to hold telcos accountable, and preventive, making sure providers understand their obligations, how to comply and the repercussions of failing to do so. This is exactly what a robust telecommunications sector requires in a modern Australia, and I'm proud to play a part in advancing this bill.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  2. Dan Repacholi Dan Repacholi supports the bill because it will strengthen consumer protections by giving the communications regulator faster enforcement powers, substantially increasing penalties and preventing harmful telecommunications providers from operating unchecked.
    “It is also important to take note that the key players in the sector are right behind these changes. Organisations and bodies like the Australian Communications Consumer Action Network, the Consumer Action Law Centre, the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman, the Australian Communications and Media Authority and the Communications Alliance are all on the same page. We're all fighting for this the same way. Everyone is on board, because even blind Freddy could see that things need to change. What we have now is just not good enough. It isn't working. As the old saying goes, if something isn't broken, don't fix it. But this system is broken. It is truly broken, and we are here to fix it. I've had constituents come to me feeling like they are being ripped off by their service providers, and constituents have told me that they pay for a service that does not always work and that they do not always get what they want from their service provider. As an Albanese Labor government, we are making this better. We will fix this problem. That's what this bill does. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 26 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Tania Lawrence Tania Lawrence supports the bill because it strengthens consumer protections by empowering ACMA to act immediately against telecommunications providers, impose much larger penalties and compensate customers for substandard services.
    “The Albanese government's stated ambition is to make Australia the most connected continent. Minister Rowland has stated that this is not just about infrastructure. It also must come with the long-term interest of consumers, which is about safeguards as well, and this is the mechanism to achieve it. I congratulate the minister for all the extraordinary work she has achieved for our country. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Ed Husic Husic supports the bill because it gives the regulator stronger enforcement powers, makes industry standards mandatory and imposes substantially higher penalties when telecommunications providers fail consumers.
    “This is the gap that the bill is designed to close. It significantly strengthens the compliance and enforcement tools available to the regulators. It increases the maximum civil penalties the Federal Court can impose to equivalent of nearly $10 million today and introduces modernised penalty frameworks, allowing the court to set fines based on the benefit gained from the breach or a percentage of the provider's turnover, which is huge. That approach aligns telecommunications with sectors like banking and energy, where we already recognise that stronger penalties are necessary. And it makes the industry codes mandatory and directly enforceable.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 14 May 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Carol Berry Berry supports the bill because it strengthens consumer protections by increasing penalties, making industry codes directly enforceable and empowering ACMA to hold harmful telecommunications providers accountable.
    “It is essential that all Australians, regardless of their individual circumstances, are able to access and use telecommunications services. Contemporary consumer safeguards and industry obligations should reflect the role of telecommunications as an essential service, especially as businesses, governments and other organisations increasingly shift to online interaction platforms. This bill strengthens the safeguards that protect consumers and cracks down on telecommunications providers who mistreat customers. It ensures telecommunications providers meet community expectations by acting in good faith, providing reliable services and supporting customers. If they don't do these things, they will be accountable to the regulator. These are important reforms, and I commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 14 May 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Shayne Neumann Neumann supports the bill because it strengthens consumer protections by giving ACMA faster enforcement powers, substantially higher penalties and greater authority to hold telecommunications providers accountable.
    “This bill is another way that the government is putting consumers at the centre of the telco industry. It's going to beef up enforcement and compliance. It's going to establish a carriage service provider registration scheme, increasing the visibility of the carriage service providers, and enable ACMA to stop providers operating in a market when it believes they pose an unacceptable risk to consumers or cause significant harm. It will increase the visibility in the market. No-one wants to get rid of the market, but we want to make sure that the market works better. It will provide improved pathways for ACMA and other government agencies to educate carriage service providers on their regulatory obligations and to streamline complaints and compliance processes. And I think it will create a better situation in terms of the market overall. We do live in a free enterprise economy, and we want to make sure that that market works for everyone fairly and justly. At the moment, it doesn't. Empowering ACMA, under this legislation, to take greater powers and greater tools to rebalance the unequal situation between consumers and telcos is a very important thing, and the legislation is a very worthy piece of legislation that deserves support.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Madonna Jarrett Jarrett supports the bill because it strengthens consumer protections by increasing penalties for telecommunications misconduct, making industry codes directly enforceable and empowering the regulator to exclude dishonest providers.
    “The Albanese government is committed to keeping Australians connected no matter where they live, no matter their circumstances, and with this bill we are ensuring that the regulator is empowered, that industry codes are enforceable and that dodgy providers can be identified and can no longer slip through the cracks. It's about making sure consumers are protected and that there is trust in our telecommunications system. It's about delivering a telecommunications system that supports our families, our businesses and our communities. I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 01 Apr 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Steve Georganas 2 contributions Georganas supports the bill because it strengthens ACMA's compliance and enforcement powers, helping protect consumers from unreliable services, irresponsible selling practices and other telecommunications failures.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Steve Georganas on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Georganas supports the bill because it strengthens ACMA's compliance and enforcement powers, helping protect consumers from unreliable services, irresponsible selling practices and other telecommunications failures.

    “The reforms proposed in this bill go to the compliance and enforcement regime for consumer safeguards that constitute this comprehensive package of improved arrangements. This is about equipping the watchdogs with the powers that they require. More importantly, we need to do our job and inform consumers about what rights they have when it comes to signing up with new telcos or when things do go wrong and they cannot find a way through it. We need this bill, and that's what this bill is doing.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 14 May 2026

    Georganas supports the bill because it gives ACMA stronger enforcement powers, much larger penalties and a provider registration scheme to protect consumers from unreliable services and misconduct.

    “We require these reforms, because under stronger powers and stronger penalties, the regulator is better positioned to respond quickly when issues do arise—when telecommunications services cause harm. When industry code becomes directly enforceable, providers have a stronger incentive to comply, and consumers have a clearer pathway for protection. When infringement notices can be issued more effectively, poor practices will get addressed faster. There's proof in the pudding for that. When there's a registration scheme for carriage service providers, it becomes harder for dodgy operators to sit in the shadows of the market and sell their wares to unsuspecting consumers. Ultimately, it will be easier to identify who they are through this bill. This is what good regulation should do. It should protect families, protect consumers and not frustrate them; support essential services such as our telecommunications industry and not undermine them; and ensure that no organisation providing critical communications infrastructure can treat reliability and safety as optional. I'd like to congratulate the minister, who's in the room with us, for this good bill. I commend this bill to the House.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  9. Andrew Leigh Andrew Leigh supports the bill because it will strengthen consumer protections by letting the regulator act immediately against telecommunications breaches, imposing much larger penalties and barring providers that cause serious harm.
    “Labor's competition and consumer agenda is an ambitious one. We make no apologies for that. We established the competition taskforce within Treasury, which has spearheaded the biggest reform of our merger laws in 50 years and a revamp of national competition policy, curtailing the abuse of non-compete clauses. There's work to deal with the problems that the supermarket duopoly can cause for both shoppers and suppliers. Labor's supermarket reforms are about ensuring a fairer deal for farmers and a fairer deal for families. This bill before the House is about ensuring a better deal for telecommunications customers. Everything this government does is focused on the best interests of Australians, and I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Susan Templeman 2 contributions Templeman supports the bill because it gives the communications regulator stronger and faster enforcement powers, substantially increases penalties and improves accountability for telecommunications providers that harm consumers.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Susan Templeman on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Templeman supports the bill because it gives the communications regulator stronger and faster enforcement powers, substantially increases penalties and improves accountability for telecommunications providers that harm consumers.

    “This is common to many of the things that we have done in this term of parliament; we have looked at rules that have been neglected for a decade. No-one's bothered looking at them. They haven't served a purpose. They haven't been fit for purpose. They haven't been fit for the 21st century and how things have changed. What we're seeing in this legislation is an update to take into account not only how the world has changed but also how consumer expectations have changed, as they should. I'm very pleased that we are doing something that backs consumers and allows people to stand up to telecommunications companies, be given a fair deal and seek a remedy when they are not given a fair deal. I commend this bill to the House.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 04 Sept 2025

    Templeman supports the bill because it gives ACMA stronger enforcement powers and much larger penalties to protect consumers from harmful telecommunications practices and hold providers accountable.

    “This bill equips the telecommunications industry regulator, ACMA, with the tools and powers that it desperately needs to protect consumers from poor and harmful telecommunications practices. Significantly there are very big increases in the penalties that can be applied. For instance, it increases by 40 times civil penalties that the Federal Court can issue for breaches of industry codes and industry standards. We're not just doubling something. We're not just boosting it a bit. What we're saying is that this needs to be much bigger—40 times larger. The cap is now up from $250,000 to nearly $10 million. It's a shame that we need to have such a big stick there to make the telcos do the right thing, but our conclusion is that we absolutely need to have much stronger powers and much greater capacity to act when they do the wrong thing.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  11. Campbell Julie-Ann Campbell strongly supports the bill, arguing it will better protect consumers by giving ACMA stronger enforcement powers, sharply increasing penalties, making industry codes directly enforceable, and creating a registration scheme to crack down on harmful providers.
    “The reforms in this bill will change that. This bill empowers the telecommunications industry regulator, ACMA, with the tools it needs to protect consumers and to hold providers to account.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 09 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  12. Jerome Laxale Laxale supports the bill because it strengthens consumer protections, gives the regulator faster enforcement powers and imposes tougher penalties on telecommunications providers that mistreat customers.
    “This is the culmination of a very careful review of active stakeholder engagement and of decisive leadership. I pay credit to the minister, who has done an extraordinary amount of work in one term to reform these really important parts of her portfolio. We don't just talk about putting consumers first or at the forefront of our reforms; we legislate it too. This legislation is for every Australian that is connected by their phone or tablet. It's for a single mum in Gladesville trying to contact Centrelink or a small-business owner in Lane Cove who needs to be online all the time. It's for the elderly couple in Eastwood who need to use telehealth for their care. It's for every worker, parent and grandparent who relies on their phone or internet connection to stay informed, stay connected and engage in modern society. It's for people who cannot afford for the system to break down or can't afford for their complaints not to be dealt with. It's for the people who don't have the hours to sit on the phone on hold and fight long battles with telecommunication companies who sometimes don't do the best by their consumers. It's for people who just want a fair deal and decent service. This is another step in putting consumers at the heart of regulation that we do, and I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  13. Jodie Belyea Jodie Belyea strongly supports the bill because it strengthens consumer protections, makes industry codes directly enforceable and gives the communications regulator tougher powers and penalties to address misconduct by telecommunications providers.
    “In 2026 the simple act of making a call, paying a bill online, making a GP appointment or checking in on a loved one depends on one thing: reliable telecommunications. When that connection fails and when Australians are misled, overcharged or ignored by the very companies they rely on, the consequences are very real. People can—and unfortunately do—lose their lives. That is why I rise to speak today in strong support of the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 14 May 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  14. Claire Clutterham Clutterham supports the bill because it gives the telecommunications regulator stronger powers to protect consumers, including much higher penalties, mandatory compliance with industry codes and the ability to exclude seriously noncompliant providers as a last resort.
    “That's where we get to this bill. It is so important, in that it will equip the telecommunications industry regulator with the tools and powers it needs to protect Australian consumers and to carry out its remit, so Australian consumers do not fall foul of poor and harmful telecommunications practices. Some of the measures this bill proposes include increasing the quantum of civil penalties that can be issued by the Federal Court for breaches of industry codes and standards. This is being increased by 40 times, from $250,000 to nearly $10 million, because bigger deterrents are needed. The bill also modernises the civil penalties framework to give the Federal Court options in relation to issuing fines for regulatory breaches. This can include three times the benefit gained from the regulatory breach, $10 million or 30 per cent of organisation turnover. Currently the civil penalties for breaches of industry codes and standards are not a deterrent. They are not commensurate with the harm caused. They are not high enough to deter noncompliance.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 04 Sept 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  15. Rob Mitchell Rob Mitchell supports the bill because it strengthens the telecommunications regulator, increases penalties for breaches and protects consumers from unaccountable service providers and harmful practices.
    “I'm proud to rise to support the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025, and I'm proud to be part of a party that is committed to keeping Australians connected, no matter where they live.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 14 May 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  16. David Smith David Smith supports the bill because it strengthens ACMA's enforcement powers, substantially increases penalties and enables stronger action against telecommunications providers that harm consumers.
    “I also rise to speak in favour of the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025, which will give effect to a number of significant reforms to boost the enforcement powers and penalties available to the Australian Communications and Media Authority, or ACMA, and complement a host of other initiatives the government is taking to better protect consumers.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 26 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  17. Jo Briskey Briskey strongly supports the bill, saying it will protect families and small businesses by giving the telecommunications regulator stronger enforcement powers, sharply increasing penalties and requiring providers to register and follow industry codes.
    “Australians had a choice at the last election between two very different approaches: the Coalition, with weak protections, dodgy operators running riot and corporate lunches, and Labor, with tough enforcement, fair rules and protections that put families, workers and small businesses first. To no-one's surprise, they voted for a fair go. This legislation is doing just that—bringing fairness to the forefront, building trust among consumers and providing much-needed accountability. It is about putting people back at the heart of the telecommunications system. That's what the Albanese Labor government is delivering, and that's why I stand here proudly to commend this bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 04 Sept 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  18. Mike Freelander Mike Freelander supports the bill because it will make telecommunications providers more accountable, allow regulators to stop providers that pose unacceptable risks, and strengthen enforcement and penalties for poor service.
    “Telecommunications is now such an important part of our lives and of our business that we can't work without it. Industry codes are directly enforceable by ACMA. This will enable ACMA to take immediate and appropriate action to address consumer concerns and complaints. It also provides incentives to industry compliance. There are civil penalties, and the courts can now issue breaches of key regulatory instruments, for the greater good of many people. It will expand and clarify authority to increase infringement notice penalties ACMA can issue for breaches in a short period of time. The current provisions are confusing. They do not allow the Minister for Communications to increase penalties in certain areas. These reforms go to the compliance and enforcement regime for consumers and for businesses and constitute a comprehensive package of improvements to those arrangements. This bill is a very important one to my community and I commend it to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 26 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  19. Gabriel Ng Ng supports the bill because it puts telecommunications consumers first by strengthening safeguards, regulator enforcement powers and penalties for providers that breach their obligations.
    “Reliable telecommunications are critical for access to employment, education, health care and other essential services. This bill complements those investments. As networks expand and improve, it is equally important that consumers are treated fairly and that providers meet clear standards of conduct. Australians should have confidence that the services they rely on are delivered responsibly. They should also have confidence that, when providers fail, there are real and enforceable consequences. This legislation reflects a clear commitment to putting consumers first. It strengthens safeguards, improves accountability and ensures telecommunications services meet the expectations of the people who depend on them every day. For these reasons, I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 14 May 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  20. Rowan Holzberger Rowan Holzberger supports the bill as part of the government's effort to strengthen consumer safeguards and hold telecommunications companies accountable for service failures, scams and mistreatment of vulnerable customers.
    “I rise in support of the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025, and, in doing so, I very much acknowledge the work of the Minister for Communications, who is doing an incredible job in what is a very difficult and essential portfolio in an industry which is wracked with problems and which, really, I think has been allowed to get away with some unconscionable conduct. It is a credit to the minister that this bill forms a part of that general approach to fixing that essential service, and I very much think that she's really doing a fantastic job. In fact, she's far more diplomatic than I would be when talking about some of these telcos. I'll use her words, just in case I get a bit intemperate myself. She said:”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 13 May 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  21. Alice Jordan-Baird Jordan-Baird supports the bill because it will hold telecommunications providers accountable for reliable essential services by sharply increasing penalties and allowing the regulator to act immediately on breaches of consumer safeguards.
    “I rise to speak in support of the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill. Every Australian deserves reliable, quality and affordable telecommunications no matter where they live. In 2026, connectivity is not just a nice-to-have. It's not a luxury. It's a necessity. In this day and age, we rely on communications for basic daily activities, like using a credit card or checking the news. Many of us rely on telecommunications to work, to get an education and to stay in touch with our loved ones. In rural and regional areas, many Australians even rely on telecommunications to see a doctor through telehealth. In 2026, a quality, reliable telecommunications service should be a given, and yet it isn't. That is unacceptable, and that's why we've brought forward this bill. This is yet another part of a bigger picture of bringing all telcos up to standard.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 01 Apr 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  22. Anne Stanley 2 contributions Stanley supports the bill because it gives the telecommunications regulator stronger enforcement powers to hold providers accountable and protect consumers from harmful practices.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Anne Stanley on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Stanley supports the bill because it strengthens consumer protections by giving the communications regulator faster enforcement powers, substantially increasing penalties and establishing a registration scheme for service providers.

    “The bill that comes before us today, the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025, unequivocally legislates better protections for telco consumers. It puts consumers at the front and centre of the telecommunication industry. It will do this by giving effect to a number of significant reforms to boost the enforcement powers of the Australian Communications and Media Authority, the ACMA. The proposed changes in this bill will enable the ACMA to take immediate and direct enforcement action against telecommunications providers that have breached their obligations to customers under industry codes. In doing so, it will remove the two-step and somewhat lengthy process that is currently in place. The measures in this bill will ensure that ACMA is an empowered and effective regulator and also that there are incentive structures in place to drive better behaviours by the telecommunications companies.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 04 Sept 2025

    Stanley supports the bill because it gives the telecommunications regulator stronger enforcement powers to hold providers accountable and protect consumers from harmful practices.

    “I was glad to have a chance to speak on the legislation earlier this year. I know how important this is to make this system more accountable and to stop companies from ripping people off. For too long, the regulator hasn't been given the necessary tools to make sure the telecommunications companies are doing the right thing. The Albanese Labor government has been working to improve our regulators, from strengthening the financial systems regulator to establishing the National Anti-Corruption Commission. We believe, in this country, that it doesn't matter how big you are or what wealth and power you have—no-one is exempt from consequences, no-one is above right or wrong, and no-one is above the law. I commend the bill to the House.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  23. Zaneta Mascarenhas Mascarenhas supports the bill because it strengthens consumer protections by giving ACMA faster enforcement powers, imposing much larger penalties and requiring telecommunications providers to register.
    “Labor support the Australian public, we support consumers and we are committed to protecting consumers. I commend the Minister for Communications for bringing forward this important legislation. I commend the government for its ongoing commitment to protecting consumers. I urge all members of the House to support this bill.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  24. Sharon Claydon Claydon supports the bill because it strengthens consumer protections, gives regulators faster enforcement powers and substantially increases penalties for telecommunications providers that break the rules.
    “Labor believe in fairness, we believe in accountability and we believe that no telco should get away with harming consumers for the sake of their bottom line. To those who have suffered from poor telco service, from unfair treatment, from outrageous penalties and from frustrating delays, this bill is for you. It is for the family who needs reliable internet for their child's education. It is for the small-business owner who cannot afford to lose another day of work due to service failures. It is for every Australian, as every Australian deserves to be treated with respect, and I urge all members in this parliament to support this bill and to stand with the millions of Australians who rely on their phone and internet services every day.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  25. Trish Cook Cook strongly supports the bill, arguing that tougher penalties, provider registration and stronger enforcement powers for ACMA will deter harmful practices and better protect telecommunications consumers.
    “I rise today to speak on a matter which is critical to the lives of every single Australian, and it's a matter that goes directly to the heart of our government's values of fairness, accountability and trust. I am speaking in strong support of the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025. Enhancing consumer safeguards—that's what it's all about.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 04 Sept 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  26. Kristy McBain McBain strongly supports the bill because it will protect telecommunications customers by strengthening ACMA's enforcement powers, substantially increasing penalties for providers and improving transparency, while also expanding reliable mobile access in regional and remote communities.
    “We know how important NBN is to drive productivity, particularly for regional Australians who work from home, for our small businesses and to access telehealth and so much more. It's for this reason that, under the Albanese government, the NBN is not for sale. But those opposite might sell it off to the highest bidder. Labor built the NBN, just like we built Medicare, superannuation and the NDIS, and it is only Labor that you can trust to deliver better connectivity for all Australians. It's an essential part of keeping connected—having reliable affordable services for all of our telcos. You need reliable connectivity to run small businesses, to work from home or, when you are at a point of crisis and need to arrange support. When things go wrong, telcos have an obligation to support you and, if they don't, we are ensuring that there are consequences for them. This is what this bill will support, and this is why I'm so incredibly happy to support this fabulous bill.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 26 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  27. Michelle Rowland 2 contributions Rowland urges the House to pass the bill because it strengthens consumer protections by giving the ACMA greater oversight and enforcement powers, making industry codes directly enforceable and increasing penalties for telecommunications providers.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Michelle Rowland on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 12 Feb 2025

    Rowland urges the House to pass the bill because it strengthens consumer protections by giving the ACMA greater oversight and enforcement powers, making industry codes directly enforceable and increasing penalties for telecommunications providers.

    “Taken together, the reforms in the bill strengthen consumer protections and enhance compliance and enforcement of telecommunications consumer safeguards, for the benefit of the whole community.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Rowland urges members to support the bill, arguing that stronger enforcement powers, mandatory industry-code compliance and substantially higher penalties will better protect telecommunications consumers and hold providers accountable.

    “The Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 is about delivering a stronger, better targeted and more equitable compliance and enforcement regime for the telecommunications sector. The Albanese government has listened to feedback from industry, regulators, the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman and consumer advocates to develop these reforms. Most importantly, we've listened to Australians. These reforms will ensure the right settings are in place to incentivise telecommunications service providers to comply with the law and provide quality services to consumers. They reflect the Albanese government's commitment to making sure Australians are appropriately protected and supported in their interactions with telecommunications service providers. I call on members to support the bill.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  28. Alison Byrnes Byrnes supports the bill as a significant step towards stronger consumer protections, arguing that provider registration, enforceable industry codes and increased accountability will help prevent consumer harm and exclude disreputable operators.
    “The Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 is a significant step towards achieving this commitment. The bill aims to amend the Telecommunications Act 1997 to establish a carrier service provider registration scheme, make industry codes directly enforceable by ACMA and amend existing arrangements relating to the application of penalty amounts for infringement notices and civil penalties. These amendments are designed to enhance consumer protections and ensure that telecommunications providers are held to the highest standards of service and accountability. The minister has reviewed the telecommunications consumer protection framework and has consulted with many stakeholders to make these changes.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  29. Alicia Payne Payne supports the bill because it strengthens consumer protections, empowers the telecommunications regulator and creates stronger incentives for telcos to comply and treat customers better.
    “Our government knows that staying connected is a critical part of life. The reforms proposed in the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 go to the compliance and enforcement regime for consumer safeguards and constitute a comprehensive package of improvements to those arrangements. They help to ensure the ACMA is an empowered and effective regulator and that appropriate incentive structures are in place to drive better behaviour by telcos.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

12 speakers · 16 contributions · 11 support · 1 unclear

  1. Barnaby Joyce Barnaby Joyce supports the bill's stronger consumer safeguards, arguing that telecommunications companies must be required to follow industry codes and face penalties when they fail to provide reliable services, particularly in regional areas.
    “We have a right to ask the telecommunications companies to abide by this, because they've got bucketloads of money from us to set up mobile phone towers and they got bucketloads of money for the assets they hold when they sell in and out of spectrum. In some areas, there's a virtual monopoly on the provision of a mobile phone service. There has to be mandatory compliance with the industry codes that have been set up. There has to be, as this talks to, a proper infringement process if people decide there's a buck to be made by not abiding by the rules.”

    National Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Alison Penfold Penfold supports the bill as an important step towards stronger consumer protections and tougher enforcement against telecommunications providers, but argues it should also raise service standards and address unreliable regional phone and internet access.
    “This is an important step towards holding the telcos to account to industry standards, but I think what is missing from this legislation is a consideration of the standards themselves. As they currently stand, the bar is too low. We need to reassess the universal service obligation. The USO is the obligation for Telstra to ensure that standard telephone services are reasonably accessible to all people in Australia on an equitable basis, wherever they reside or carry on business, and to ensure that payphones are reasonably accessible to all people in Australia on an equitable basis, wherever they reside or carry on business. Rather than being maintained or improved, the quality of landline phone infrastructure is noticeably deteriorating, especially in rural areas of the electorate. In times of emergency, the consequence can be life threatening. Not only is Telstra failing in its universal service obligation of providing reasonable standard telephone services via landline phone connection, but it is also failing to provide a reliable and cost-effective alternative. Many people are forced to go to the more expensive Starlink satellite in the hope that it will prove to be reliable. This government must negotiate new terms that better reflect advances in technology. Telstra and, indeed, all providers need to be held to account and made to uphold these new universal service obligations.”

    National Party • MP • 04 Sept 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Aaron Violi Aaron Violi says the coalition supports the bill because it will strengthen consumer protections by registering telecommunications providers, enabling faster enforcement and substantially increasing penalties.
    “The coalition is supporting the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025. However, I have to note that it is disappointing that the bill has entered parliament on the eve of the election. Given this is a setting week that we weren't going to have—we all know the Prime Minister was planning to not have this week—it wouldn't have been introduced at all. The unfortunate reality is that it is unlikely to become law before the end of this parliamentary term.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 26 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Anne Webster 2 contributions Webster says the coalition supports the bill because it strengthens telecommunications consumer protections and enforcement, but argues it falls short of the comprehensive overhaul needed to address persistent service problems, especially in regional Australia.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Anne Webster on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech National Party • MP • 26 Mar 2025

    Webster says the bill has worthy aims because stronger enforcement and penalties could stop telecommunications companies treating consumer safeguards as a cost of doing business, especially benefiting regional Australians. However, she does not clearly state whether she will support its passage.

    “The Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 has some worthy aims. It seeks to ensure telecommunications businesses do not treat consumer protection provisions and specifically their penalties as a cost of doing business. Consumers ought to be treated with respect, and from the perspective of the Nationals, especially in regional Australia, this bill would allow ACMA to directly enforce industry codes and increase the penalty amounts for infringement notices and civil penalties. By the by, this parliament passed legislation by the same name last May for consumers affected by the statutory infrastructure provider, SIP, scheme.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech National Party • MP • 04 Sept 2025

    Webster says the coalition supports the bill because it strengthens telecommunications consumer protections and enforcement, but argues it falls short of the comprehensive overhaul needed to address persistent service problems, especially in regional Australia.

    “The coalition supports this bill, which is a step in the right direction when it comes to enhancing consumer protections in telecommunications. However, this bill is not a comprehensive review of consumer protections in the telecommunications sector, something which the Regional Telecommunications Independent Review Committee, RTIRC, called for in their December 2024 report, which the government has failed to respond to. There is a legislative requirement to respond to this report within six months. They are three months overdue so far. There are 14 recommendations, and we are yet to hear a peep from the minister. The coalition's form in government on responding to RTIRC reports within the legislative timeframe was far stronger than Labor's, and I hope the government's response to the RTIRC report is not waiting until the universal outdoor mobile obligation, or UOMO, legislation passes the parliament. UOMO is by no means a comprehensive solution to shortcomings in regional telecommunications.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  5. Michael McCormack 2 contributions Michael McCormack supports the bill because its provider registration scheme will improve market accountability and allow stronger penalties against telecommunications companies that put consumers at risk.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Michael McCormack on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech National Party • MP • 26 Mar 2025

    Michael McCormack supports the bill because its provider registration scheme will improve market accountability and allow stronger penalties against telecommunications companies that put consumers at risk. He also stresses the importance of reliable mobile coverage for regional communities and small businesses.

    “This bill establishes a carriage service provider registration scheme to increase visibility of providers operating in the market and enables the Australian Communications and Media Authority to stop providers which pose an unacceptable risk to consumers. As the member for Spence outlined in his contribution, there are penalties for those providers not doing the best thing by their customers and consumers, and, to that end, I think that's good. I agree with him wholeheartedly. During the sale of Telstra, I know that, back on 15 September 2005, my predecessor, Kay Hull, crossed the floor because she was concerned that the universal service obligations by Telstra would not be met.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech National Party • MP • 04 Sept 2025

    McCormack supports the bill because it strengthens consumer protections through provider registration, direct enforcement and much higher penalties, while also commending the coalition amendment.

    “These arrangements are similar to those in the energy sector, where the Australian Energy Regulator has the power to forbid operators from operating in a market where there is risk to consumers. They can't determine the price of power, unfortunately, but they're able to do that. This telecommunication amendment is good legislation. It's worthwhile legislation, but I do commend to the House the amendment put forward by the member for Lindsay.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  6. Aldred Mary Aldred supports the bill, describing its consumer protection reforms as overdue and a step in the right direction, especially stronger enforceable industry codes, cybersecurity reporting and tougher penalties.
    “This bill, along with the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025, seeks to provide critical reforms that will help prevent situations where consumers are put at risk or are not able to access the services that they need and should be able to rely on. The bill says it will create a register of all carriage service providers, giving ACMA full visibility of operators in the Australian market. It says it'll make compliance with industry codes mandatory and enforceable without the delays of the current two-step warning process. This is a good thing. If you can have light-handed, industry-led regulation, that's a great outcome, but not in all cases is that achievable. Making that a mandatory and enforceable industry code is a step in the right direction. Requiring providers to report cybersecurity incidents and take swift remedial action is an important reform, particularly in the age we live in, where a growing number of cybersecurity related breaches and threats posed to consumers, small businesses and lots of companies across the board that deal with sensitive consumer data is important. This bill says it will seek to increase penalties for breaches from $250,000 to $10 million, with the possibility of even higher fines based on the provider's turnover or benefit obtained from the breach.”

    Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 09 Feb 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Tony Pasin Tony Pasin does not clearly state whether he supports the bill, instead arguing that telecommunications companies and the minister must investigate widespread losses of mobile coverage after the 3G shutdown, particularly in regional communities.
    “I have written to the telcos providing them with that data. I have asked them to investigate each and every case. It wasn't me that made the undertaking. I didn't make the promise. The telcos made the promise. The telcos promised the Australian people and the minister in particular that when they turned off the 3G network they wouldn't suffer loss. But that's exactly what's happened. And so, in my view, it's incumbent on the telecommunications companies to investigate each and every single one of those allegations of loss to determine whether in fact people living in regional communities who are paying for a service are receiving that service. If they don't undertake those investigations, then, in my view, we'll know that they knew full well what the outcome of the 3G switch-off would be. The minister should demand they undertake those investigations.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 27 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Melissa McIntosh 2 contributions Melissa McIntosh says the coalition will support the bill because it strengthens consumer protections, enables faster enforcement and gives the regulator greater visibility of telecommunications providers, while criticising the government for introducing it too late to pass before the election.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Melissa McIntosh on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Liberal Party • MP • 26 Mar 2025

    Melissa McIntosh says the coalition will support the bill because it strengthens consumer protections, enables faster enforcement and gives the regulator greater visibility of telecommunications providers, while criticising the government for introducing it too late to pass before the election.

    “The coalition will support the bill. It strengthens consumer protections, streamlines enforcement activity and provides greater visibility of operators in the market. This is the sort of legislation this parliament should be focused on, legislation that protects Australians. Disappointingly, though, this bill has entered the parliament on the eve of an election and is unlikely to pass the Senate and become law before the parliament is prorogued. What is more disappointing is that this bill took second place behind the Albanese government's NBN commitment to public ownership bill, which this parliament has spent hours debating so the Albanese government could attempt to revive their privatisation scare campaign. That bill does nothing for Australian consumers, nothing to protect them from the cost of living, nothing to protect them from never-ending price increases of energy bills or when at the petrol bowser and nothing to protect them from interest rate increases. Yet it is, again, this week before the Senate, prioritised over bills that might actually make a difference.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Liberal Party • MP • 04 Sept 2025

    McIntosh says the coalition will support the bill because it strengthens consumer protections and telecommunications regulation, while criticising the government over the 3G network closure and its response to regional coverage problems.

    “Notwithstanding the failures I have just highlighted, the coalition will support this legislation. It does provide stronger protections for consumers and strengthens the integrity of the sector. I commend the bill to the House and move the second reading amendment. I move:”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  9. Venning 2 contributions Tom Venning supports the bill as an overdue, commonsense measure that strengthens ACMA’s registration, enforcement and penalty powers to protect consumers.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Venning on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    BILLS;Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025;Second Reading - 09 Feb 2026 Liberal Party of Australia • MP • 09 Feb 2026

    Tom Venning supports the bill as an overdue, commonsense measure that strengthens ACMA’s registration, enforcement and penalty powers to protect consumers. He argues, however, that Labor has failed rural and regional Australians through worsening telecommunications access and a botched 3G shutdown, saying safeguards alone do not fix the lack of reliable service.

    “Mr VENNING (Grey) (19:18): Thanks to the previous speaker for their contribution, but I must say we are not comparing apples with apples. It's well and good to put rules and regulations around existing services, but what happens when those services are getting worse or that service doesn't exist at all? That is the reality faced by too many rural, regional and remote Australians. Let me be clear from the outset: the coalition supports this bill. Frankly, it is overdue. It introduces commonsense changes to an act that has been lagging behind a rapidly evolving market. 'Commonsense' is not a word I would typically use to describe this Labor government, which is unfortunate for the Australian people and for the Aussie battler.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Liberal Party • MP • 01 Apr 2026

    Tom Venning says the coalition supports the bill's stronger penalties for telecommunications providers, but argues the government is neglecting unreliable coverage and emergency connectivity in regional South Australia.

    “The coalition supports the bill, but we condemn the neglect. We need a government that understands that regional Australia is the engine room of our nation. Our farmers, our miners and our regional small businesses deserve better than a 'sorry; no service' message from the Albanese government. Regional SA is calling out for help. The question is: will the government answer?”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  10. Dan Tehan Tehan supports the bill because it strengthens enforcement, increases penalties and improves transparency and consumer safeguards without imposing an excessive red-tape burden.
    “The Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill creates a register of carriage service providers, enables the direct enforcement of an industry development code, increases the maximum penalty amount from $250,000 to $10 million and amends the existing two-step process for the application of penalty amounts for infringement notices. It's a bill which enjoys support across the parliament. Obviously, doing more to increase transparency to make sure that, where there are abuses, we can act upon them is something that everyone wants to see in this place. Anything which enhances consumer safeguards and does so in a way that is sensible and doesn't put a huge red-tape burden in place is obviously something that we would support.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 26 Mar 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  11. Ted O'Brien Ted O'Brien says the coalition will support the bill because it strengthens consumer protections by improving oversight of telecommunications providers, enabling faster enforcement of industry codes and substantially increasing penalties for breaches.
    “When it comes to the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 that is before the House today, it's noteworthy that this bill will create a register of carriage service providers, enable the direct enforcement of industry codes, amend the existing two-step process for the application of penalty amounts for infringement notices and increase the maximum penalty amount for breaches of the codes from $250,000 to $10 million. Given the bill strengthens consumer protections, streamlines enforcement and provides greater visibility of operators in the market, it will receive support from the coalition.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 01 Apr 2026

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

1 speaker · 1 support

Full record

Full chat