Too weak
The bill was described as containing only "weasel words," suggesting its obligations were not strong enough.
This bill is currently before Parliament.
Transport & communications
The bill would set up a register of telecommunications service providers so there is a clearer record of who is operating in the market.
A previous poor telecommunications rollout left consumers facing serious service problems and weak protections.
A poor telecommunications rollout had already left consumers with serious service problems and weak protections, and the government had started work on a bill to create a clearer record of providers. After the first version lapsed with the election, consumer groups pushed for urgent action, and the 2025 bill reintroduced the plan by setting up the register and giving ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers. power to stop risky providers.
The main criticism was that the bill was a welcome step but too late and too limited to fix the telecoms problems it was responding to, especially for regional customers. That view came mainly from coalition speakers, while the coalition still supported the bill and a Senate scrutiny committee only asked for a response on rights and liberties issues.
The government introduced this bill. Supportive speeches so far have come from Labor, Liberal, Nationals, LNP, some crossbench members.
Did it become law?
Not yet
Final passage
No final vote yet
The bill has not yet completed passage through Parliament.
Days since introduction
286 days
Updated 10 June 2026.
Meaning
The bill would set up a register of telecommunications service providers so there is a clearer record of who is operating in the market. It would also give the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers.) power to stop providers operating if they pose an unacceptable risk to consumers or cause significant harm.
The bill would make registered telecommunications industry codes mandatory, so ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers. could enforce them directly instead of first having to tell a provider to comply and wait for further non-compliance.
The bill would sharply increase the maximum civil penalties for breaking industry codes and standards, aligning them with higher existing penalties and allowing even larger penalties where a provider gained a benefit or has high turnover.
The bill would clarify that the Communications Minister can increase infringement notice amounts anywhere ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers. already has power to issue an infringement notice, without expanding the kinds of breaches that can get an infringement notice.
This Schedule establishes a Carriage Service Provider (CSP) registration scheme within Part 4 of the Tel Act to increase visibility of CSPs operating in the market and enable the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to stop CSPs operating in the market who pose unacceptable risk to consumers, or cause significant consumer harm.Explanatory memorandum
Amendments to Part 6 of the Tel Act make compliance with industry codes mandatory and remove the need for the ACMA to direct a particular participant to comply with the code in the first instance.Explanatory memorandum
This Schedule amends Part 31 of the Tel Act to increase the maximum general civil penalty for breaches of industry codes and industry standards from $250,000 to 30,300 penalty units ($9.999 million at the time of drafting) to align with penalties available for breaches of service provider determinations prior to the amendments ($10 million). The penalty amount for industry codes, industry standards, and service provider determinations will be aligned to 30,300 penalty units. The Schedule will also modernise the penalty framework for these instruments to allow penalties based on the value of the benefit obtained from the conduct or the turnover of the relevant provider – allowing for penalties greater than $9.999 million. This penalty framework will incentivise industry compliance and better aligns with those in other relevant sectors like energy and banking, and under the Australian Consumer Law.Explanatory memorandum
Amendments to Part 31B allow the Minister for Communications to increase infringement notice penalty amounts for any breach where the ACMA can already issue an infringement notice. This creates a more clear and consistent regulatory framework. The amendments do not alter the existing infringement notice regime more broadly, for example, the amendments do not expand the contraventions for which the ACMA can issue an infringement notice.Explanatory memorandum
Context
A poor telecommunications rollout had already left consumers with serious service problems and weak protections, and the government had started work on a bill to create a clearer record of providers. After the first version lapsed with the election, consumer groups pushed for urgent action, and the 2025 bill reintroduced the plan by setting up the register and giving ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers. power to stop risky providers.
First consumer safeguards bill introduced
The government introduced the bill and moved its second reading in the House of Representatives.
Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 – Parliament of Australia ↗ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers. gets last-resort stop power
The bill gave ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers. a last-resort power to stop telecommunications providers operating when they pose an unacceptable risk or cause significant harm.
Explanatory memorandum ↗Consumer groups press for fast passage
ACCANAustralian Communications Consumer Action Network, the main national consumer advocacy group for communications services. welcomed the bill's return and urged Parliament to pass it quickly so ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers. could respond to consumer harm.
Long awaited consumer-boosting legislation hits Parliament – regulator must now act | ACCAN ↗Customers must be kept connected
If a provider's registration ends, the bill requires notice to suppliers and customers and arrangements to transfer customers to another registered provider.
Explanatory memorandum ↗Earlier bill lapses after election
The government reintroduced the bill after the earlier version lapsed with prorogation and the federal election.
Government moves to legislate better protections for telco consumers | Ministers for the Department of Infrastructure ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills considered the bill in Scrutiny Digest 5 of 2025 on 04/09/2025. It raised personal rights and liberties issues and sought a ministerial response.
Considered in published report
Scrutiny Digest 5 of 2025Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
Key criticism
The main criticism was that the bill was a welcome step but too late and too limited to fix the telecoms problems it was responding to, especially for regional customers. That view came mainly from coalition speakers, while the coalition still supported the bill and a Senate scrutiny committee only asked for a response on rights and liberties issues.
The available criticism was narrow and mostly about timing, scope, or safeguards, not outright opposition.
Too weak
The bill was described as containing only "weasel words," suggesting its obligations were not strong enough.
Too late
It was criticised as being introduced too late to address the consumer harm already caused by telecom failures.
Regional fix needed
The criticism was that the government was still not doing enough on the wider regional telecom problems and the 3G shutdown.
Rights concerns
The scrutiny committee said the bill raised personal rights and liberties issues and sought a ministerial response.
Further sources
Votes
No recorded votes have been found yet for this bill.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
The minister argues that the bill will strengthen telecommunications consumer protections by improving ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers.’s enforcement powers, introducing a provider registration scheme, and increasing penalties for breaches.
Read in Hansard ↗Wilson says the coalition will support the bill, arguing that basic telecommunications safeguards and standards are important, while warning that such powers must not be used by government to censor or control Australians.
Read in Hansard ↗Joyce says regional consumers are being dangerously let down by mobile and telecommunications failures, especially after the 3G shutdown, and argues providers must be compelled to meet stronger obligations.
Read in Hansard ↗Burnell strongly supports the bill, arguing it will strengthen ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers.’s enforcement powers, increase penalties, improve transparency through provider registration, and better protect telecommunications consumers from harmful and exploitative conduct.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
24 speakers · 28 contributions · 24 support
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Burnell on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
BILLS;Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025;Second Reading - 26 Mar 2025
Burnell strongly supports the bill, arguing it will strengthen ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers.’s enforcement powers, increase penalties, improve transparency through provider registration, and better protect telecommunications consumers from harmful and exploitative conduct. He presents it as a needed modernisation of consumer safeguards and explicitly commends the bill to the House.
“I commend this bill to the House.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS - Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 - Second Reading
Burnell argues that Australians' heavy reliance on telecommunications means telcos must face stronger consumer protections, and he says the bill will let ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers. act faster, make compliance with industry codes mandatory, and impose tougher penalties on providers that exploit or harm consumers. He presents the measure as a necessary reform to improve accountability and protect vulnerable customers.
“The Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 achieves this in two ways. Firstly, it equips the government with greater authority via the Australian Communications and Media Authority to take swift action against telcos that breach their existing obligations. Secondly, it strengthens the penalty framework, ensuring appropriate consequences when a telco missteps, while also encouraging companies to prevent such conduct from occurring in the first place. This bill is both reactive, providing a strong and meaningful mechanism to hold telcos accountable, and preventive, making sure providers understand their obligations, how to comply and the repercussions of failing to do so. This is exactly what a robust telecommunications sector requires in a modern Australia, and I'm proud to play a part in advancing this bill.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“As an Albanese Labor government, we are making this better. We will fix this problem. That's what this bill does. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Albanese government's stated ambition is to make Australia the most connected continent. Minister Rowland has stated that this is not just about infrastructure. It also must come with the long-term interest of consumers, which is about safeguards as well, and this is the mechanism to achieve it. I congratulate the minister for all the extraordinary work she has achieved for our country. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Empowering ACMA, under this legislation, to take greater powers and greater tools to rebalance the unequal situation between consumers and telcos is a very important thing, and the legislation is a very worthy piece of legislation that deserves support.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Albanese government is committed to keeping Australians connected no matter where they live, no matter their circumstances, and with this bill we are ensuring that the regulator is empowered, that industry codes are enforceable and that dodgy providers can be identified and can no longer slip through the cracks. It's about making sure consumers are protected and that there is trust in our telecommunications system. It's about delivering a telecommunications system that supports our families, our businesses and our communities. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The reforms proposed in this bill go to the compliance and enforcement regime for consumer safeguards that constitute this comprehensive package of improved arrangements. This is about equipping the watchdogs with the powers that they require. More importantly, we need to do our job and inform consumers about what rights they have when it comes to signing up with new telcos or when things do go wrong and they cannot find a way through it. We need this bill, and that's what this bill is doing.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill before the House is about ensuring a better deal for telecommunications customers. Everything this government does is focused on the best interests of Australians, and I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Templeman on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
BILLS;Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025;Second Reading - 27 Mar 2025
Susan Templeman argues that the bill is needed to strengthen consumer protections in telecommunications by giving ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers. stronger and faster enforcement powers, increasing penalties, and improving oversight of providers. She says the reforms will better protect consumers, have broad stakeholder backing, and explicitly commends the bill to the House.
“I'm very pleased that we are doing something that backs consumers and allows people to stand up to telecommunications companies, be given a fair deal and seek a remedy when they are not given a fair deal. I commend this bill to the House.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS;Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025;Second Reading - 04 Sep 2025
Susan Templeman supports the bill, arguing it strengthens ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers.’s powers, sharply increases penalties, makes industry codes enforceable and improves oversight of carriage service providers to better protect telecommunications consumers. She says the reforms are urgent, align telco regulation with other essential services and form part of the government’s broader consumer protection agenda.
“It will expand outdoor voice and SMS coverage into existing mobile black spots that are really challenging to tackle because of the geography. It will improve the availability of mobile signals during disasters and power outages. These are the sorts of things that we are prioritising, always putting consumers first. This bill looks at protections for consumers. We have separately looked at expanding access to services for consumers. We have got more protections for victims-survivors of domestic and family violence, and I am very proud to be part of a government that says the consumer comes first. The services exist to serve consumers, and how they are treated in the process is absolutely vital. I commend this bill to the House.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“The reforms in this bill will change that. This bill empowers the telecommunications industry regulator, ACMA, with the tools it needs to protect consumers and to hold providers to account.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is another step in putting consumers at the heart of regulation that we do, and I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“That's where we get to this bill. It is so important, in that it will equip the telecommunications industry regulator with the tools and powers it needs to protect Australian consumers and to carry out its remit so Australian consumers do not fall foul of poor and harmful telecommunications practices. Some of the measures this bill proposes include increasing the quantum of civil penalties that can be issued by the Federal Court for breaches of industry codes and standards. This is being increased by 40 times, from $250,000 to nearly $10 million, because bigger deterrents are needed. The bill also modernises the civil penalties framework to give the Federal Court options in relation to issuing fines for regulatory breaches. This can include three times the benefit gained from the regulatory breach, $10 million or 30 per cent of organisation turnover. Currently, the civil penalties for breaches of industry codes and standards are not a deterrent. They are not commensurate with the harm caused. They are not high enough to deter noncompliance.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Mr DAVID SMITH (Bean—Government Whip) (19:18): I also rise to speak in favour of the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025, which will give effect to a number of significant reforms to boost the enforcement powers and penalties available to the Australian Communications and Media Authority, or ACMA, and complement a host of other initiatives the government is taking to better protect consumers.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Australians had a choice at the last election between two very different approaches: the coalition, with weak protections, dodgy operators running riot and corporate lunches, and Labor, with tough enforcement, fair rules and protections that put families, workers and small businesses first. To no-one's surprise, they voted for a fair go. This legislation is doing just that—bringing fairness to the forefront, building trust among consumers and providing much-needed accountability. It is about putting people back at the heart of the telecommunications system. That's what the Albanese Labor government is delivering, and that's why I stand here proudly to commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Telecommunications is now such an important part of our lives and of our business that we can't work without it. Industry codes are directly enforceable by ACMA. This will enable ACMA to take immediate and appropriate action to address consumer concerns and complaints. It also provides incentives to industry compliance. There are civil penalties, and the courts can now issue breaches of key regulatory instruments, for the greater good of many people. It will expand and clarify authority to increase infringement notice penalties ACMA can issue for breaches in a short period of time. The current provisions are confusing. They do not allow the Minister for Communications to increase penalties in certain areas. These reforms go to the compliance and enforcement regime for consumers and for businesses and constitute a comprehensive package of improvements to those arrangements. This bill is a very important one to my community and I commend it to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Ms JORDAN-BAIRD (Gorton) (13:19): I rise to speak in support of the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill. Every Australian deserves reliable, quality and affordable telecommunications no matter where they live. In 2026, connectivity is not just a nice-to-have. It's not a luxury. It's a necessity. In this day and age, we rely on communications for basic daily activities, like using a credit card or checking the news. Many of us rely on telecommunications to work, to get an education and to stay in touch with our loved ones. In rural and regional areas, many Australians even rely on telecommunications to see a doctor through telehealth. In 2026, a quality, reliable telecommunications service should be a given, and yet it isn't. That is unacceptable, and that's why we've brought forward this bill. This is yet another part of a bigger picture of bringing all telcos up to standard.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Stanley on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
BILLS;Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025;Second Reading - 27 Mar 2025
Anne Stanley supports the bill, arguing it strengthens consumer protections by empowering ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers. to take faster enforcement action, increasing penalties for breaches, and creating a registration scheme for carriage service providers. She says the reforms put consumers at the centre of telecommunications regulation and improve accountability across the sector.
“I commend the bill to the House.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS - Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 - Second Reading
Anne Stanley supports the bill, arguing it will strengthen ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers.’s enforcement powers, raise penalties, create a carriage service provider registration scheme and make industry codes directly enforceable to better protect telecommunications consumers. She says the reforms will improve accountability, stop harmful providers and give regulators the tools needed to prevent consumer harm.
“I was glad to have a chance to speak on the legislation earlier this year. I know how important this is to make this system more accountable and to stop companies from ripping people off. For too long, the regulator hasn't been given the necessary tools to make sure the telecommunications companies are doing the right thing. The Albanese Labor government has been working to improve our regulators, from strengthening the financial systems regulator to establishing the National Anti-Corruption Commission. We believe, in this country, that it doesn't matter how big you are or what wealth and power you have—no-one is exempt from consequences, no-one is above right or wrong, and no-one is above the law. I commend the bill to the House.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“Labor support the Australian public, we support consumers and we are committed to protecting consumers. I commend the Minister for Communications for bringing forward this important legislation. I commend the government for its ongoing commitment to protecting consumers. I urge all members of the House to support this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“That is why we are bringing this bill to parliament—to strengthen the safeguards that protect consumers.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Labor believe in fairness, we believe in accountability and we believe that no telco should get away with harming consumers for the sake of their bottom line. To those who have suffered from poor telco service, from unfair treatment, from outrageous penalties and from frustrating delays, this bill is for you. It is for the family who needs reliable internet for their child's education. It is for the small-business owner who cannot afford to lose another day of work due to service failures. It is for every Australian, as every Australian deserves to be treated with respect, and I urge all members in this parliament to support this bill and to stand with the millions of Australians who rely on their phone and internet services every day.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill is a testament to the Albanese Labor government's commitment to a fair, accountable and trusted telecommunications system. It is a win for consumers, a win for integrity and a win for a more connected Australia. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We know how important NBN is to drive productivity, particularly for regional Australians who work from home, for our small businesses and to access telehealth and so much more. It's for this reason that, under the Albanese government, the NBN is not for sale. But those opposite might sell it off to the highest bidder. Labor built the NBN, just like we built Medicare, superannuation and the NDIS, and it is only Labor that you can trust to deliver better connectivity for all Australians. It's an essential part of keeping connected—having reliable affordable services for all of our telcos. You need reliable connectivity to run small businesses, to work from home or when you are at a point of crisis and need to arrange support. When things go wrong, telcos have an obligation to support you—and if they don't we are ensuring that there are consequences for them. This is what this bill will support, and this is why I'm so incredibly happy to support this fabulous bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Rowland on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
BILLS;Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025;Second Reading - 12 Feb 2025
The minister argues that the bill will strengthen telecommunications consumer protections by improving ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers.’s enforcement powers, introducing a provider registration scheme, and increasing penalties for breaches. She says the reforms have strong stakeholder backing and urges the House to support and pass the bill.
“Noting this level of strong support for these reforms, and the important outcomes they enable for Australian telco consumers, I encourage all representatives in this place to give it their support as well.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS;Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025;Second Reading - 27 Mar 2025
The minister says the bill strengthens telecommunications consumer protections by creating a provider registration scheme, making industry codes directly enforceable, and increasing penalties so the ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers. can act more quickly and effectively against providers that harm consumers. She argues the reforms deliver a stronger and fairer compliance regime and explicitly calls on members to pass the bill.
“The Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 is about delivering a stronger, better targeted and more equitable compliance and enforcement regime for the telecommunications sector. The Albanese government has listened to feedback from industry, regulators, the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman and consumer advocates to develop these reforms. Most importantly, we've listened to Australians. These reforms will ensure the right settings are in place to incentivise telecommunications service providers to comply with the law and provide quality services to consumers. They reflect the Albanese government's commitment to making sure Australians are appropriately protected and supported in their interactions with telecommunications service providers. I call on members to support the bill.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“The Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 is a significant step towards achieving this commitment. The bill aims to amend the Telecommunications Act 1997 to establish a carrier service provider registration scheme, make industry codes directly enforceable by ACMA and amend existing arrangements relating to the application of penalty amounts for infringement notices and civil penalties. These amendments are designed to enhance consumer protections and ensure that telecommunications providers are held to the highest standards of service and accountability. The minister has reviewed the telecommunications consumer protection framework and has consulted with many stakeholders to make these changes.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Our government knows that staying connected is a critical part of life. The reforms proposed in the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 go to the compliance and enforcement regime for consumer safeguards and constitute a comprehensive package of improvements to those arrangements. They help to ensure the ACMA is an empowered and effective regulator and that appropriate incentive structures are in place to drive better behaviour by telcos.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
11 speakers · 15 contributions · 10 support · 1 unclear
“But another thing we have to look at is how law can be weaponised by government to seek to silence or censor people. So I look at this bill—and we're going to support it—but I do so, frankly, with caution. I'm old enough—and I'm not that old—to remember the last time we had a Labor government. There are members in this chamber who weren't here and are now, bright eyed and bushy tailed—some elected in 2025 and some that were elected before then—sitting on the government benches, proudly wearing the moniker of the Australian Labor Party—”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Ms PENFOLD (Lyne) (12:44): The Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 makes changes to the Telecommunications Act to strengthen consumer safeguards, something we should all agree is a top priority. The bill will create a register of carriage service providers, enable the direct enforcement of industry codes, amend the existing two-step process for the application of penalty amounts for infringement notices, and increase the maximum penalty amount for breaches of the codes from $250,000 to $10 million. Full visibility of all telecommunications operators will also ensure ACMA can target compliance and enforcement activities and, where necessary, take appropriate action. The changes in this bill will strengthen ACMA's powers and the speed at which they can use them, to provide even greater protections for consumers and ensure we have responsible operators in our telecommunications sector.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We are supporting this bill because it will give consumers greater protections. It will create a register of carriage service providers. It will enable the direct enforcement of industry codes, which is crucial. It will amend the existing two-step process for the application of penalty amounts for infringement notices. This is a really important one: it will increase the maximum penalty for breaches of the code from $250,000 to $10 million. That's important because it means that, if providers are doing the wrong thing and they are letting their consumers down and letting our communities down, there is a significant cost that they will bear from these penalties.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Webster on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
BILLS;Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025;Second Reading - 26 Mar 2025
Webster says the bill has "some worthy aims" in strengthening consumer protections and penalties, but her speech mainly focuses on poor mobile coverage in regional Australia, the impacts of the 3G shutdown and criticism of the government's handling of telecommunications services in the Mallee. She does not clearly state support for or opposition to the bill itself.
“Dr WEBSTER (Mallee) (13:16): The Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 has some worthy aims. It seeks to ensure telecommunications businesses do not treat consumer protection provisions and specifically their penalties as a cost of doing business. Consumers ought to be treated with respect, and from the perspective of the Nationals, especially in regional Australia, this bill would allow ACMA to directly enforce industry codes and increase the penalty amounts for infringement notices and civil penalties. By the by, this parliament passed legislation by the same name last May for consumers affected by the statutory infrastructure provider, SIP, scheme.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS - Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 - Second Reading
Webster supports the bill as a step toward stronger telecommunications consumer protections and enforcement, while arguing it is not a comprehensive review of the sector. She also criticises the government for delaying its response to the regional telecommunications review and for broader failures affecting regional connectivity.
“The coalition supports this bill, which is a step in the right direction when it comes to enhancing consumer protections in telecommunications. However, this bill is not a comprehensive review of consumer protections in the telecommunications sector, something which the Regional Telecommunications Independent Review Committee, RTIRC, called for in their December 2024 report, which the government has failed to respond to. There is a legislative requirement to respond to this report within six months. They are three months overdue so far. There are 14 recommendations, and we are yet to hear a peep from the minister. The coalition's form in government on responding to RTIRC reports within the legislative timeframe was far stronger than Labor's, and I hope the government's response to the RTIRC report is not waiting until the universal outdoor mobile obligation, or UOMO, legislation passes the parliament. UOMO is by no means a comprehensive solution to shortcomings in regional telecommunications.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by McCormack on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
BILLS;Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025;Second Reading - 26 Mar 2025
McCormack supports the bill, arguing it will strengthen oversight of carriage service providers, improve accountability and complaints handling, and impose meaningful penalties on providers that fail consumers. He links the need for stronger telecommunications safeguards to the serious impacts of poor mobile coverage in regional Australia, while also criticising the government’s broader telecommunications record.
“This bill establishes a carriage service provider registration scheme to increase visibility of providers operating in the market and enables the Australian Communications and Media Authority to stop providers which pose an unacceptable risk to consumers. As the member for Spence outlined in his contribution, there are penalties for those providers not doing the best thing by their customers and consumers, and, to that end, I think that's good. I agree with him wholeheartedly. During the sale of Telstra, I know that, back on 15 September 2005, my predecessor, Kay Hull, crossed the floor because she was concerned that the universal service obligation of Telstra would not be met.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS;Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025;Second Reading - 04 Sep 2025
McCormack supports the bill, arguing it strengthens consumer protections through provider registration, stronger ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers. enforcement and tougher penalties, while also highlighting benefits for domestic violence victim-survivors and scam prevention. He also stresses the importance of reliable telecommunications for regional communities, farmers and emergencies, and commends an opposition amendment to improve the bill.
“Mr McCORMACK (Riverina) (12:18): Janelle Ruggeri and Graeme Kruger just brought along to my office some very impressive young people: Nathan Crawley, Emily Marston, Sarah McCaskie, Thomas Hatty and Daniel Andreazza from Griffith and Tocumwal. They're not from my Riverina electorate per se, but they certainly are from the geographic area of Riverina. They are rice growers. You might wonder why I'm raising this—before I get a point of order on relevance from the minister at the table—as part of the debate on the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025. Like the member for Macquarie, I appreciate that farming requires good telecommunications, and every place needs the very best telecommunications and the utmost safeguards for consumers. That is why the coalition supports this bill's second iteration. It has been enhanced by an amendment—an excellent one, at that—moved by the shadow minister for communications and shadow minister for women, the member for Lindsay. I acknowledge that she has put that forward, and I very much commend it to the House.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“This bill, along with the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025, seeks to provide critical reforms that will help prevent situations where consumers are put at risk or are not able to access the services that they need and should be able to rely on. The bill says it will create a register of all carriage service providers, giving ACMA full visibility of operators in the Australian market. It says it'll make compliance with industry codes mandatory and enforceable without the delays of the current two-step warning process. This is a good thing. If you can have light-handed, industry-led regulation, that's a great outcome, but not in all cases is that achievable. Making that a mandatory and enforceable industry code is a step in the right direction. Requiring providers to report cybersecurity incidents and take swift remedial action is an important reform, particularly in the age we live in, where a growing number of cybersecurity related breaches and threats posed to consumers, small businesses and lots of companies across the board that deal with sensitive consumer data is important. This bill says it will seek to increase penalties for breaches from $250,000 to $10 million, with the possibility of even higher fines based on the provider's turnover or benefit obtained from the breach.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I have written to the telcos providing them with that data. I have asked them to investigate each and every case. It wasn't me that made the undertaking. I didn't make the promise. The telcos made the promise. The telcos promised the Australian people and the minister in particular that when they turned off the 3G network they wouldn't suffer loss. But that's exactly what's happened. And so, in my view, it's incumbent on the telecommunications companies to investigate each and every single one of those allegations of loss to determine whether in fact people living in regional communities who are paying for a service are receiving that service. If they don't undertake those investigations, then, in my view, we'll know that they knew full well what the outcome of the 3G switch-off would be. The minister should demand they undertake those investigations.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by McIntosh on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
BILLS;Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025;Second Reading - 26 Mar 2025
McIntosh supports the bill, arguing it strengthens consumer protections by registering telecommunications providers, making industry codes directly enforceable, and increasing penalties for breaches. She also criticises the government for introducing it too late and prioritising other legislation over measures she says would better protect Australians.
“The coalition will support the bill. It strengthens consumer protections, streamlines enforcement activity and provides greater visibility of operators in the market. This is the sort of legislation this parliament should be focused on, legislation that protects Australians. Disappointingly, though, this bill has entered the parliament on the eve of an election and is unlikely to pass the Senate and become law before the parliament is prorogued. What is more disappointing is that this bill took second place behind the Albanese government's NBN commitment to public ownership bill, which this parliament has spent hours debating so the Albanese government could attempt to revive their privatisation scare campaign. That bill does nothing for Australian consumers, nothing to protect them from the cost of living, nothing to protect them from never-ending price increases in energy bills or when at the petrol bowser and nothing to protect them from interest rate increases. Yet it is again before the Senate this week, prioritised over bills that might actually make a difference.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS - Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 - Second Reading
McIntosh says the bill strengthens consumer safeguards by creating a provider register, making industry codes directly enforceable, and increasing penalties for breaches. She states the coalition will support the legislation, while using the speech to criticise the government's handling of telecommunications issues, especially the 3G network closure.
“Notwithstanding the failures I have just highlighted, the coalition will support this legislation. It does provide stronger protections for consumers and strengthens the integrity of the sector. I commend the bill to the House and move the second reading amendment. I move:”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Venning on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
BILLS;Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025;Second Reading - 09 Feb 2026
Tom Venning supports the bill as an overdue, commonsense measure that strengthens ACMAAustralia’s communications regulator, which would enforce telco rules and could block risky providers.’s registration, enforcement and penalty powers to protect consumers. He argues, however, that Labor has failed rural and regional Australians through worsening telecommunications access and a botched 3G shutdown, saying safeguards alone do not fix the lack of reliable service.
“Mr VENNING (Grey) (19:18): Thanks to the previous speaker for their contribution, but I must say we are not comparing apples with apples. It's well and good to put rules and regulations around existing services, but what happens when those services are getting worse or that service doesn't exist at all? That is the reality faced by too many rural, regional and remote Australians. Let me be clear from the outset: the coalition supports this bill. Frankly, it is overdue. It introduces commonsense changes to an act that has been lagging behind a rapidly evolving market. 'Commonsense' is not a word I would typically use to describe this Labor government, which is unfortunate for the Australian people and for the Aussie battler.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
BILLS - Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 - Second Reading
Venning supports the bill because it strengthens penalties and consumer safeguards against poor telecommunications providers, while arguing it does not go far enough to fix severe mobile coverage failures in regional and rural South Australia. He uses the debate to condemn the government's neglect of bush telecommunications and demand more urgent action on connectivity, emergency access and scams.
“The coalition supports the bill, but we condemn the neglect. We need a government that understands that regional Australia is the engine room of our nation. Our farmers, our miners and our regional small businesses deserve better than a 'sorry; no service' message from the Albanese government. Regional SA is calling out for help. The question is: will the government answer?”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“The Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill creates a register of carriage service providers, enables the direct enforcement of an industry development code, increases the maximum penalty amount from $250,000 to $10 million and amends the existing two-step process for the application of penalty amounts for infringement notices. It's a bill which enjoys support across the parliament. Obviously, doing more to increase transparency to make sure that, where there are abuses, we can act upon them is something that everyone wants to see in this place. Anything which enhances consumer safeguards and does so in a way that is sensible and doesn't put a huge red-tape burden in place is obviously something that we would support.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Australian Communications Consumer Action Network, the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have long advocated for civil penalty reform to ensure penalties for breaches of codes and standards reflect the severity of the breach and the harm caused. The increase in penalties will address this and align the telecommunications penalty framework to those in the energy and banking sectors, competition legislation and Australian consumer law. Thus, the coalition will support the bill. At the end of the day, it will strengthen consumer protection, streamline enforcement activity and provide greater visibility of operators in the market.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 1 support · 1 mixed
“We have a right to ask the telecommunications companies to abide by this, because they've got bucketloads of money from us to set up mobile phone towers and they got bucketloads of money for the assets they hold when they sell in and out of spectrum. In some areas, there's a virtual monopoly on the provision of a mobile phone service. There has to be mandatory compliance with the industry codes that have been set up. There has to be, as this talks to, a proper infringement process if people decide there's a buck to be made by not abiding by the rules.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Mr GEE (Calare) (13:13): I support the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 because I believe it can make a positive contribution towards holding telecommunications companies to account, and I think that aspect of it is supported.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
Members debated the bill in principle before the chamber decided whether to keep considering it.
Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills
Considered in published report
Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills considered the bill in Scrutiny Digest 5 of 2025 on 04/09/2025. It raised personal rights and liberties issues and sought a ministerial response.
Considered by scrutiny committee (4 Sept 2025): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 5 of 2025
Scrutiny Digest 5 of 2025