Support without endorsement
The opposition said it would not oppose supply, but argued that support for government services did not amount to endorsing the government's economic program.
This bill became law on Oct 29th, 2025.
Budget, tax & economy
Appropriates $14,571,651,000 from the Consolidated Revenue FundThe main Commonwealth public money account from which Parliament authorises federal spending. for 2025-26 services that are not the ordinary annual servicesA constitutional category for regular government services, which must be appropriated separately from other spending. of government.
The bill was introduced because the 2025-26 appropriation bills introduced in the previous Parliament lapsed when the House was dissolved before the federal election. It provided the remaining seven-twelfths of 2025-26 funding, plus Budget measures, for spending that is not classified as the ordinary annual servicesA constitutional category for regular government services, which must be appropriated separately from other spending. of government. The ministerial speech also framed passage before the end of November as necessary for continuity of government programs and Commonwealth entities.
This Act is one of the core annual appropriation laws for the 2025-26 Budget, paired with Appropriation Act (No. 1) and the parliamentary departments appropriation. Supply ActsAn interim appropriation law that funds government until the main annual appropriation Acts pass. had already covered roughly the first five months of the financial year, so this bill completed the remaining funding authority after the earlier budget bills lapsed at the election. The debate was less about whether supply should pass and more about the government's budget priorities, cost-of-living record, infrastructure spending and net-zero-related expenditure.
The collected record shows the Coalition did not oppose the appropriation bills, but used the debate to criticise the government's economic management, cost-of-living record and spending choices. A One Nation second-reading amendment went further, seeking to delay further consideration until amendments removed funding for net-zero measures and their administration.
Daniel Mulino MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 29 Oct 2025
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
Members called out ‘aye’ or ‘no’ — no individual votes were recorded.
Passage speed
91 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Appropriates $14,571,651,000 from the Consolidated Revenue FundThe main Commonwealth public money account from which Parliament authorises federal spending. for 2025-26 services that are not the ordinary annual servicesA constitutional category for regular government services, which must be appropriated separately from other spending. of government.
Reintroduces a 2025-26 appropriation billA bill that authorises government spending from the Consolidated Revenue Fund for specified purposes. that had lapsed when the House of Representatives was dissolved, so the remaining seven-twelfths of annual appropriationsA bill that authorises government spending from the Consolidated Revenue Fund for specified purposes. and Budget measures could be funded.
Covers non-ordinary annual servicesA constitutional category for regular government services, which must be appropriated separately from other spending. such as payments to states and territories, administered items, administered assets and liabilities, equity injections and payments to corporate entities.
The largest portfolio totals in Schedule 2 include about $7.16 billion for Defence, $2.42 billion for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts, and $1.69 billion for Finance.
Maintains an Advance to the Finance MinisterA capped mechanism allowing extra appropriations for urgent or unforeseen expenditure during the financial year. mechanism for urgent or unforeseen expenditure, capped with the Supply ActAn interim appropriation law that funds government until the main annual appropriation Acts pass. (No. 2) advance at $600 million.
Commenced on Royal AssentThe formal approval that turns a bill passed by both houses into an Act., which was recorded on 29 October 2025; the Act was registered on the Federal Register of Legislation on 30 October 2025.
The total of the items specified in Schedule 2 is $14,571,651,000.Appropriation Act (No. 2) 2025-2026 as made
These Bills are being reintroduced in order to provide the remaining 7/12ths of the estimated 2025-26 annual appropriations for anticipated government expenditure until the end of June 2026 (for the final seven months of 2025-26), as well as funding for the 2025-26 Budget measures.Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026 explanatory memorandum
Part 2 of the Bill proposes appropriations to make payments of the amounts in Schedule 2 for State, ACT, NT and local government items (clause 7), administered items (clause 8), administered assets and liabilities items (clause 9), other departmental items (clause 10) and corporate entity items (clause 11).Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026 explanatory memorandum
Department of Defence ... 7,160,041 ... Total: Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, ... 2,418,411 ... Total: Finance ... 1,685,382Appropriation Act (No. 2) 2025-2026 as made
Subclause 12(3) provides that the total amount that can be determined under subclause 12(2) and subsection 12(2) of the Supply Act (No. 2) 2025-2026 cannot be more than $600 million.Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026 explanatory memorandum
The whole of this Act 29 Oct 2025Federal Register of Legislation metadata and Act text
Context
This Act is one of the core annual appropriation laws for the 2025-26 Budget, paired with Appropriation Act (No. 1) and the parliamentary departments appropriation. Supply ActsAn interim appropriation law that funds government until the main annual appropriation Acts pass. had already covered roughly the first five months of the financial year, so this bill completed the remaining funding authority after the earlier budget bills lapsed at the election. The debate was less about whether supply should pass and more about the government's budget priorities, cost-of-living record, infrastructure spending and net-zero-related expenditure.
Earlier budget bills introduced
The explanatory memorandum says the 2025-26 appropriation bills were introduced into the 47th Parliament alongside the supply bills on 25 March 2025.
Explanatory memorandum ↗Earlier bills lapse at dissolution
The same memorandum says those appropriation bills lapsed when the House of Representatives was dissolved on 28 March 2025.
Explanatory memorandum ↗Supply ActsAn interim appropriation law that funds government until the main annual appropriation Acts pass. begin covering first months
The 2025-26 Supply ActsAn interim appropriation law that funds government until the main annual appropriation Acts pass. commenced on 1 July 2025 and provided about five-twelfths of estimated annual appropriationsA bill that authorises government spending from the Consolidated Revenue Fund for specified purposes. through to the end of November.
Explanatory memorandum ↗Bill reintroduced in the House
The bill was introduced and the second reading was moved in the House of Representatives on 30 July 2025.
APH bill page ↗Bill passes both houses
The APH progress table records final passage through both houses on 28 October 2025.
APH bill page ↗Royal AssentThe formal approval that turns a bill passed by both houses into an Act. given
Royal AssentThe formal approval that turns a bill passed by both houses into an Act. was recorded on 29 October 2025, turning the bill into Appropriation Act (No. 2) 2025-2026.
APH bill page and Federal Register of Legislation ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Referred to Federation Chamber
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Reported from Federation Chamber
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal approval that turns a bill passed by both houses into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
The collected record shows the Coalition did not oppose the appropriation bills, but used the debate to criticise the government's economic management, cost-of-living record and spending choices. A One Nation second-reading amendment went further, seeking to delay further consideration until amendments removed funding for net-zero measures and their administration.
The bill still passed both houses, and the collected record contains no recorded division on the bill or amendment.
Support without endorsement
The opposition said it would not oppose supply, but argued that support for government services did not amount to endorsing the government's economic program.
Cost-of-living criticism
Coalition speakers argued that households were worse off under the government and linked the budget bills to wider concerns about inflation, housing, insurance and energy costs.
Net-zero funding objection
One Nation proposed delaying the bills until amendments were circulated to remove funding for net-zero measures and their administration.
Regional infrastructure concerns
Some regional and opposition speakers used the debate to argue that government spending priorities were not meeting local infrastructure and road-repair needs.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Daniel Mulino moved the second reading and presented the bill as part of the package underpinning the government's 2025-26 Budget.
Read in Hansard ↗Helen Haines welcomed funding for the Cheaper Home Batteries Program and said it would help households use solar power more effectively.
Read in Hansard ↗Shayne Neumann supported the bills and defended the government's economic record, arguing inflation had returned to the target band while employment and wages remained strong.
Read in Hansard ↗Alicia Payne supported the package of appropriation bills and described budget management as a question of national priorities.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
10 speakers · 10 support
“I'm pleased to speak on the Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2025-2026, the Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026 and the Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 1) 2025-2026, to support the passage of them”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise in support of the package of appropriation bills.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The 2025-26 budget is firmly focused on those issues—not just talking about them, not just empty rhetoric about them”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise today in strong support of these appropriation bills because at their heart are fairness, opportunity and building a future that works for every Australian.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This budget also invests in scholarships for nurses and midwives, supporting the next generation of health professionals in our region.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Albanese Labor government is aspirational, and it is a reflection of the community of Dunkley”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Election commitments are an important part of election campaigns because they provide incumbents and candidates the opportunity to really connect with their communities”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Labor's appropriation bill reflects our priorities and our Labor values.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Braddon will benefit from two Medicare mental health centres.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Appropriation Bill (No. 2) seeks approval for appropriations from the Consolidated Revenue Fund of $14.6 billion.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
7 speakers · 8 contributions · 6 mixed · 1 unclear
“I think I should start by talking about the debt.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“However, I feel this is under threat from the policies of the Labor government in relation to energy, water, infrastructure and labour.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise tonight to speak on probably the most important issue for Lyne residents, certainly the one that is raised with me every day, and that is the state of roads right across the Lyne electorate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Labor promised Australians permanent energy bill relief, but, instead, they have been hit with yet another spike in the cost of living.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Tim Wilson on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Tim Wilson used the debate to press the government to honour local funding commitments and restore infrastructure support in Goldstein. He focused on adult learning, sporting facilities, safety upgrades and community infrastructure that he said had been left behind.
“Every community needs essential services to help residents live successful lives.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Tim Wilson continued his local funding critique, arguing that Bayside, Glen Eira and Kingston residents needed infrastructure, community safety upgrades and postal services. He said Labor had removed $100 million from the community and should fund promised local projects.
“Bayside, Glen Eira and Kingston residents should have decent infrastructure.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“To be very clear, the opposition will not oppose these bills. Our support ensures the continuity of essential government services and funding for ongoing activities.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I'm delighted to come to my first point this evening, which is on the Gippsland United basketball league men's team division 1”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 mixed
“I commend the government for rolling out the Cheaper Home Batteries Program, but we know that this policy didn't actually start with government.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Returned to House for further consideration
Returned to House for further consideration
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Reported from Federation Chamber
Reported from Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal approval that turns a bill passed by both houses into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.