Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders

Current status

This bill became law on Nov 4th, 2025.

Policy area

Work & employment

What does this bill do?

The Act creates a Commonwealth workplace protection orderA court order made under the Act to prevent further personal violence and protect a Commonwealth worker or Commonwealth workplace. It can be an interim, urgent interim, final or consent order. scheme for courts to prevent personal violenceConduct or threats that cause harm or reasonable fear of harm to a Commonwealth worker or a person at a Commonwealth workplace, linked to Commonwealth work and interfering with Commonwealth executive government functions. against Commonwealth workers or in Commonwealth workplaces.

Why was it introduced?

The bill was introduced to give Commonwealth employers a national, court-based protection-order tool after the Ashton review found stronger protections were needed for frontline Commonwealth workers. Parliamentary speeches repeatedly linked the measure to the May 2023 attack on Services Australia worker Joeanne Cassar, the review’s 44 recommendations, and nearly 1,700 serious incidents across Services Australia face-to-face services in 2023-24.

Broader context

The bill sits in a broader worker-safety response after the Services Australia Security Risk Management Review. Debate described it as the preventive counterpart to the Criminal Code Amendment (Protecting Commonwealth Frontline Workers) Act 2024, which increased penalties for harming Commonwealth frontline workers, while this Act lets Commonwealth entities seek protective orders before further violence occurs.

Key criticism

The collected debate shows broad support rather than direct opposition. The main cautions were about ordinary scrutiny, avoiding unintended consequences, keeping any burden on state and territory courts manageable, and ensuring orders do not cut people off from essential Commonwealth services.

Who supported it?

Tony Burke MP, Minister for Home Affairs introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in House 31 July 2025
Passed House 28 Aug 2025
Passed Senate 29 Oct 2025
Became law 04 Nov 2025

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 04 Nov 2025

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

Members called out ‘aye’ or ‘no’ — no individual votes were recorded.

Passage speed

96 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. The Act creates a Commonwealth workplace protection orderA court order made under the Act to prevent further personal violence and protect a Commonwealth worker or Commonwealth workplace. It can be an interim, urgent interim, final or consent order. scheme for courts to prevent personal violenceConduct or threats that cause harm or reasonable fear of harm to a Commonwealth worker or a person at a Commonwealth workplace, linked to Commonwealth work and interfering with Commonwealth executive government functions. against Commonwealth workers or in Commonwealth workplaces.

  2. The scheme was introduced as the government response to recommendation 17 of the Services Australia Security Risk Management Review, after an assault on Services Australia worker Joeanne Cassar and reports of almost 1,700 serious Services Australia incidents in a year.

  3. A court can make an interim, urgent interim or final order only if it is satisfied the respondent engaged in personal violenceConduct or threats that cause harm or reasonable fear of harm to a Commonwealth worker or a person at a Commonwealth workplace, linked to Commonwealth work and interfering with Commonwealth executive government functions., there is a real risk of further personal violenceConduct or threats that cause harm or reasonable fear of harm to a Commonwealth worker or a person at a Commonwealth workplace, linked to Commonwealth work and interfering with Commonwealth executive government functions., and the order is necessary or desirable to prevent it.

  4. Authorised Commonwealth officials, including the High Court Chief Executive and Principal Registrar and accountable authorities or chief executives of Commonwealth entities, can apply for orders, so affected workers do not have to bring applications in their own names.

  5. Orders can restrict attendance at Commonwealth workplaces, communication with specified workers or classes of workers, further personal violenceConduct or threats that cause harm or reasonable fear of harm to a Commonwealth worker or a person at a Commonwealth workplace, linked to Commonwealth work and interfering with Commonwealth executive government functions., and damage to property in a Commonwealth workplace.

  6. If an order would limit access to Commonwealth benefits or services, or contact with an electoral representative or other political communication, the application and order must address alternative arrangements.

  7. Final and consent orders can last up to two years, interim and urgent interim orders up to 12 months, and an urgent interim orderA short-notice order that can be sought by telephone, fax, email or other electronic means in urgent circumstances before a final-order application can be made and determined. falls away after seven days unless a final-order application is made.

  8. Contravening a condition of a Commonwealth workplace protection orderA court order made under the Act to prevent further personal violence and protect a Commonwealth worker or Commonwealth workplace. It can be an interim, urgent interim, final or consent order. is a criminal offence punishable by up to two years imprisonment, 120 penalty units, or both.

Show source excerpts
  1. This Act establishes a scheme for courts to make Commonwealth workplace protection orders to prevent personal violence against Commonwealth workers or in Commonwealth workplaces.
    Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025 introduced bill text
  2. The government has committed to implementing all 44 of those recommendations, and this bill implements recommendation No. 17 of the Ashton review by creating a Commonwealth workplace protection order scheme.
    Minister's second reading speech
  3. the respondent has engaged in personal violence; and there is a real risk that the respondent will engage in further personal violence if the order is not made; and the order is necessary or desirable to prevent the respondent from engaging in further personal violence.
    Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025 introduced bill text
  4. An application for a Commonwealth workplace protection order may be made by the following persons (called authorised persons) or their delegates: (a) the Chief Executive and Principal Registrar of the High Court; (b) the accountable authority or chief executive officer (however described) of a Commonwealth entity.
    Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025 introduced bill text
  5. the conditions may relate to any of the following: (a) that the respondent not be present at, or within a specified distance of, a specified Commonwealth workplace; ... (c) that the respondent not communicate or associate with ... a specified Commonwealth worker; or ... a specified class of Commonwealth workers;
    Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025 introduced bill text
  6. if a condition imposed on the respondent by the order would prevent the respondent from accessing or obtaining benefits or services provided by the Commonwealth—specify alternative procedures or arrangements for how the respondent may access or obtain those benefits or services;
    Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025 introduced bill text
  7. if an application for a final order against the respondent is not made within the period of 7 days after the urgent interim order is made—the end of that period
    Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025 introduced bill text
  8. Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years or 120 penalty units, or both.
    Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025 introduced bill text

Broader context for this bill

The bill sits in a broader worker-safety response after the Services Australia Security Risk Management Review. Debate described it as the preventive counterpart to the Criminal Code Amendment (Protecting Commonwealth Frontline Workers) Act 2024, which increased penalties for harming Commonwealth frontline workers, while this Act lets Commonwealth entities seek protective orders before further violence occurs.

  1. May 2023

    Attack at Services Australia Airport West

    Parliamentary speeches describe the attack on Joeanne Cassar as a trigger for the later security review and protection-order reform.

    Minister's second reading speech ↗
  2. 2023

    Ashton review recommendations

    The Services Australia Security Risk Management Review made 44 recommendations; the bill implements recommendation 17 by adapting a workplace protection orderA court order made under the Act to prevent further personal violence and protect a Commonwealth worker or Commonwealth workplace. It can be an interim, urgent interim, final or consent order. model for Commonwealth workers.

    Minister's second reading speech ↗
  3. 2024-25

    Earlier bill lapsed and was reintroduced

    The same reform was introduced in the previous parliament, passed the House in February 2025 according to Senate debate, then lapsed at the 2025 dissolution before being reintroduced in the 48th Parliament.

    Senate summing-up speech ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 31 July 2025

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 31 July 2025

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 27 Aug 2025

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate 28 Aug 2025

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

House second reading agreed 28 Aug 2025

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House third reading agreed 28 Aug 2025

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 01 Sept 2025

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 01 Sept 2025

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 29 Oct 2025

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate second reading agreed 29 Oct 2025

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Senate third reading agreed 29 Oct 2025

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Passed both houses 29 Oct 2025

Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.

Finally passed both Houses

Assent 04 Nov 2025

The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.

The main case against this bill

The collected debate shows broad support rather than direct opposition. The main cautions were about ordinary scrutiny, avoiding unintended consequences, keeping any burden on state and territory courts manageable, and ensuring orders do not cut people off from essential Commonwealth services.

These points are drawn from parliamentary debate in the supplied run. The source bundle did not include independent submissions or full committee report text, so this section should not be read as a complete map of stakeholder criticism.

Scrutiny and unintended consequences

David Coleman said the Coalition understood the intent and would cautiously support the earlier version, but would subject it to ordinary scrutiny to check for unintended consequences.

Raised by David Coleman Source ↗

Access to services

Alison Penfold supported the bill but said balancing workplace protection with continued access to benefits and services would depend on how administrators and courts handled it in practice.

Raised by Alison Penfold Source ↗

Rights guardrails

Matt Gregg supported the bill and pointed to its guardrails for access to Commonwealth services and political communication as the reason concerns about service access could be managed.

Raised by Matt Gregg Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

28 Aug 2025

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

29 Oct 2025

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Tony Burke

Australian Labor Party • MP 31 July 2025

Tony Burke introduced the 2025 bill for the government, saying it reintroduced a lapsed 2024 reform and implemented recommendation 17 of the Ashton review.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Alison Penfold

National Party • MP 28 Aug 2025

Alison Penfold supported the bill’s intent and measures, especially for Services Australia, AEC and other public-facing workers.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Malarndirri McCarthy

Australian Labor Party • Senator 10 Feb 2025

Malarndirri McCarthy incorporated the government’s second reading speech for the earlier Senate bill.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Matt Gregg

Australian Labor Party • MP 28 Aug 2025

Matt Gregg supported the bill as a response to 1,694 Services Australia incidents and the Ashton review.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

15 speakers · 16 contributions · 15 support

  1. Shayne Neumann 2 contributions Shayne Neumann again supported the 2025 bill, focusing on worker safety, the Ashton review, the gap in existing state and territory schemes, and the ability for Commonwealth entities to apply on behalf of workers while preserving service access.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Shayne Neumann on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 06 Feb 2025

    Shayne Neumann supported the earlier bill as a response to the Ashton review and compared it with existing state protection-order laws. He emphasised agency applications, urgent orders, safeguards for access to services, two-year final orders and breach penalties.

    “I think this bill completes a legislative gap.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • MP • 28 Aug 2025

    Shayne Neumann again supported the 2025 bill, focusing on worker safety, the Ashton review, the gap in existing state and territory schemes, and the ability for Commonwealth entities to apply on behalf of workers while preserving service access.

    “I think this bill completes a legislative gap.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  2. Julie-Ann Campbell Julie-Ann Campbell supported the bill as part of Labor’s worker-safety agenda.
    “This bill implements recommendation 17—that the current ACT workplace protection order provisions should be adopted for use by the Commonwealth as a staff protection mechanism nationwide”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Claire Clutterham Claire Clutterham supported the bill as protection for public-facing Commonwealth workers, citing Services Australia customer aggression and the need for safe service delivery.
    “The purpose of the legislation is simple. It is to ensure that those who serve the public can do so safely.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Matt Smith Matt Smith supported the bill, saying Commonwealth workers deserve safety even when dealing with people in stressful circumstances.
    “I rise to speak in support of the Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 28 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Mary Doyle Mary Doyle strongly supported the bill, grounding her speech in the attack on Joeanne Cassar and the Ashton review.
    “I rise today in strong support of the Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Gabriel Ng Gabriel Ng supported the bill as a former public servant, saying it would shift the burden from individual victims to the Commonwealth and protect privacy.
    “This bill is long overdue, and it addresses a clear legislative gap in most state and territory protection order schemes.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Anthony Chisholm Anthony Chisholm moved the Senate second reading and incorporated the government’s 2025 speech.
    “This bill implements recommendation 17 of the Ashton review by creating a Commonwealth Workplace Protection Order scheme.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 01 Sept 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Ellie Whiteaker Ellie Whiteaker strongly supported the bill, describing Joeanne Cassar’s attack, the 1,700 serious Services Australia incidents and recommendation 17 of the Ashton review.
    “I rise today to speak in strong support of the Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 29 Oct 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  9. Richard Dowling Richard Dowling supported the bill as an ACT-style protection order scheme for Commonwealth workers nationwide.
    “This workplace protection orders bill builds upon the Ashton review's recommendation 17, which called for the adoption of an ACT-style protection order scheme for Commonwealth workers nationwide.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 29 Oct 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Josh Dolega Josh Dolega supported the bill from the perspective of a former public servant and CPSU employee.
    “the workplace protection order can be taken out so that the worker doesn't have to look at individual restraining orders or individual orders.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 29 Oct 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  11. Jess Walsh Jess Walsh summed up the Senate debate for the government, saying the bill implemented recommendation 17 of the Ashton review and complemented the 2024 Criminal Code amendment.
    “This bill implements recommendation 17 of that Ashton review by creating a Commonwealth workplace protection orders scheme”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 29 Oct 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  12. Mark Dreyfus Mark Dreyfus introduced the earlier 2024 version, arguing that Commonwealth frontline workers needed enforceable workplace protection orders after the Services Australia security review.
    “The bill responds to this unacceptable situation and implements recommendation 17 of the Ashton review by creating a Commonwealth Workplace Protection Order scheme.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 27 Nov 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

5 speakers · 4 support · 1 mixed

  1. Michael McCormack Michael McCormack supported the bill as vital protection for public servants and electorate office staff.
    “The Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025 is vital because we do need to protect at all costs our public servants”

    National Party • MP • 28 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Julian Leeser Julian Leeser supported the reintroduced bill for the Coalition, noting the earlier committee process and bipartisan backing.
    “So the coalition is pleased to reiterate its support for this bill today.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 27 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. David Coleman David Coleman said the Coalition supported the intent of the earlier bill and accepted the need for protection after the Ashton review.
    “So we will subject this bill to appropriate scrutiny. But we understand the intent of the legislation and, subject to the results of that inquiry, we will cautiously support it.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 04 Feb 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Andrew Bragg Andrew Bragg supported the bill for the Coalition in the Senate, saying it followed bipartisan support for stronger penalties for assaulting Commonwealth frontline workers.
    “the coalition is pleased to facilitate the swift passage of this bill through the Senate today.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 29 Oct 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat