This bill did not become law and is no longer proceeding.
Climate, energy & environment
The bill would repeal Australia’s national climate targets lawThe federal law that put Australia's emissions-reduction targets, including net zero by 2050, into legislation; this bill sought to repeal it., removing legislated net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. targets and links to the Paris AgreementThe international climate agreement that Australia has joined, used here as a reference point for Australia's national emissions targets..
Australia’s net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. policy was said to be driving economic damage, higher living costs, industry closures, energy reliability problems, and opaque taxpayer-backed subsidies. Barnaby Joyce MP’s private bill repeals the Climate Change Act, Net Zero Economy AuthorityA federal body set up to help workers, communities and regions adjust as industries change during the move to lower emissions; the bill would abolish it., New Vehicle Efficiency StandardA federal scheme setting emissions-efficiency rules for new vehicles sold in Australia; the bill would repeal it., clean product certificationA certification scheme for proving how clean products such as hydrogen or other goods are, so buyers can see their emissions credentials; the bill would repeal it. laws, and related net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. references and emissions controls.
Australia already had a national net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. policy architecture, including the Climate Change Act 2022The federal law that put Australia's emissions-reduction targets, including net zero by 2050, into legislation; this bill sought to repeal it. and later climate-related schemes, when Nationals MPs escalated a push in July 2025 to dump the target amid claims it was raising power prices, hurting regional communities and weakening industry. Barnaby Joyce MP responded with a private member’s repeal bill that became a focal point in the CoalitionThe federal political alliance between the Liberal Party and the Nationals, whose internal disagreement over net zero is part of this page's context.’s climate split, before the Nationals and then Liberals moved away from net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. and the bill was later removed from the Notice PaperThe official daily list of business before the House of Representatives; removal from it ended this bill's recorded progress..
Critics said the bill would take away Australia’s legislated climate targets and key emissions rules, leaving the country less able to cut pollution, attract clean-energy investment and respond to worsening climate damage. Labor and crossbench opponents raised the strongest objections, while supporters of the bill argued net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. itself was the economic problem.
Barnaby Joyce MP introduced this bill. Speeches supporting it came from LNP, Nationals, Liberal Party.
Did it become law?
No
The bill did not complete passage through Parliament.
Final passage
No final passage
The bill has not completed passage and is no longer proceeding.
Time before failure
337 days
From introduction to the final recorded step before the bill stopped proceeding
Meaning
The bill would repeal Australia’s national climate targets lawThe federal law that put Australia's emissions-reduction targets, including net zero by 2050, into legislation; this bill sought to repeal it., removing legislated net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. targets and links to the Paris AgreementThe international climate agreement that Australia has joined, used here as a reference point for Australia's national emissions targets..
The bill would abolish the Net Zero Economy AuthorityA federal body set up to help workers, communities and regions adjust as industries change during the move to lower emissions; the bill would abolish it. and repeal clean product certificationA certification scheme for proving how clean products such as hydrogen or other goods are, so buyers can see their emissions credentials; the bill would repeal it. and related charging laws under Future Made in AustraliaA federal policy package and laws aimed at supporting Australian clean-energy and low-emissions industries; the bill would remove several net zero links in it..
The bill would repeal the New Vehicle Efficiency StandardA federal scheme setting emissions-efficiency rules for new vehicles sold in Australia; the bill would repeal it., ending that federal law’s rules for vehicle emissions efficiency.
The bill would remove net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. references from Export Finance AustraliaThe Australian Government's export credit agency, which helps finance Australian export businesses and overseas projects; the bill would remove net zero references from its law. laws and the Future Made in AustraliaA federal policy package and laws aimed at supporting Australian clean-energy and low-emissions industries; the bill would remove several net zero links in it. Act.
The bill would remove the Safeguard MechanismA federal emissions control scheme that sets pollution limits for large industrial facilities; the bill would remove it through changes to reporting law., which limits emissions from major industrial facilities, by changing national greenhouse and energy reporting law.
The Climate Change Act 2022 is repealed by item 1 of Schedule 1.Repeal Net Zero explanatory memorandum
The Future Made in Australia (Guarantee of Origin) Act 2024 is repealed by item 2 of Schedule 1.Repeal Net Zero explanatory memorandum
The New Vehicle Efficiency Standard Act 2024 is repealed by item 5 of Schedule 1.Repeal Net Zero explanatory memorandum
Items 6 to 13 of Schedule 1 remove references to net zero from the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Act 1991.Repeal Net Zero explanatory memorandum
Items 27 to 51 of Schedule 1 have the effect of removing the Safeguard Mechanism by making the necessary amendments to the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007.Repeal Net Zero explanatory memorandum
Context
Australia already had a national net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. policy architecture, including the Climate Change Act 2022The federal law that put Australia's emissions-reduction targets, including net zero by 2050, into legislation; this bill sought to repeal it. and later climate-related schemes, when Nationals MPs escalated a push in July 2025 to dump the target amid claims it was raising power prices, hurting regional communities and weakening industry. Barnaby Joyce MP responded with a private member’s repeal bill that became a focal point in the CoalitionThe federal political alliance between the Liberal Party and the Nationals, whose internal disagreement over net zero is part of this page's context.’s climate split, before the Nationals and then Liberals moved away from net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. and the bill was later removed from the Notice PaperThe official daily list of business before the House of Representatives; removal from it ended this bill's recorded progress..
Australia legislates national climate targets
The Climate Change Act 2022The federal law that put Australia's emissions-reduction targets, including net zero by 2050, into legislation; this bill sought to repeal it. put Australia’s emissions-reduction and net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. commitments into national law, creating the central target that the repeal bill later sought to remove.
Repeal Net Zero explanatory memorandum ↗Nationals push to dump net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. begins publicly
SBS reported that a fresh push to abandon Australia’s net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. targets had been launched from within the Nationals while both CoalitionThe federal political alliance between the Liberal Party and the Nationals, whose internal disagreement over net zero is part of this page's context. parties were meeting to settle a new climate policy.
SBS News ↗Barnaby Joyce MP introduces the repeal bill
Barnaby Joyce MP introduced the private member’s bill and argued in his second reading speech that net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. was not changing the climate but was raising costs, damaging manufacturing and dividing regional communities.
Hansard ↗Repeal bill becomes a parliamentary focus of the climate split
ABC reported that the bill would be debated in parliament after the Queensland LNP branch voted to scrap its net zero by 2050A target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. commitment, sharpening pressure on the federal CoalitionThe federal political alliance between the Liberal Party and the Nationals, whose internal disagreement over net zero is part of this page's context.’s climate position.
ABC News ↗Nationals formally abandon net zero by 2050A target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050.
ABC reported that the Nationals had formally abandoned the commitment to reach net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. emissions by 2050, with David Littleproud proposing to tie emissions-reduction efforts to the OECDA group of mostly wealthy democracies used here as a benchmark for comparing emissions-reduction efforts. average and focus on adaptation.
ABC News ↗Liberals sign off on ditching net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050.
ABC reported that Liberal moderates were split after the party signed off on a compromise climate policy that abandoned net zero by 2050A target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050., leaving senior Liberals and Nationals to negotiate a joint CoalitionThe federal political alliance between the Liberal Party and the Nationals, whose internal disagreement over net zero is part of this page's context. position.
ABC News ↗Bill is removed from the Notice PaperThe official daily list of business before the House of Representatives; removal from it ended this bill's recorded progress.
The parliamentary record shows the Repeal Net ZeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. Bill 2025 was removed from the Notice PaperThe official daily list of business before the House of Representatives; removal from it ended this bill's recorded progress. under standing order 42A House of Representatives rule that can remove business from the Notice Paper when it has not progressed for a set time., ending its recorded progress in the House.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Key criticism
Critics said the bill would take away Australia’s legislated climate targets and key emissions rules, leaving the country less able to cut pollution, attract clean-energy investment and respond to worsening climate damage. Labor and crossbench opponents raised the strongest objections, while supporters of the bill argued net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. itself was the economic problem.
Opposition was broad in debate, but centred on policy consequences rather than technical drafting concerns.
Weaker climate action
Opponents argued that repealing net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. would ignore climate science and remove laws designed to cut emissions, making climate harm worse for farmers, regional communities and future generations.
Lost jobs and investment
Several opponents said scrapping net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. would undermine clean-energy projects, regional industry plans and investor certainty, risking jobs in areas already moving into renewable energy, batteries and lower-emissions production.
Economic and trade credibility risk
Critics warned that removing emissions targets and related clean-industry laws would damage Australia’s credibility with trading partners and weaken its position as global markets shift toward lower-emissions goods and investment.
Further sources
Votes
No recorded votes were found before this bill stopped proceeding.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Barnaby Joyce strongly backs the Repeal Net ZeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. bill, arguing net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. will not affect the climate but is driving up power and living costs, hurting poor households, and weakening Australian industry and energy security.
Read in Hansard ↗Kate Chaney opposes the bill and urges the House to reject it, arguing that repealing net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. would damage investment certainty, weaken Australia’s economic future and ignore the risks of climate change.
Read in Hansard ↗Helen Haines opposes the bill, saying it would dismantle Australia's emissions reduction framework without any credible replacement and would hurt regional communities by undermining jobs, farmer payments, community benefits and the energy transition.
Read in Hansard ↗Canavan backs the bill to scrap Australia's net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. commitment, arguing it has driven up energy prices, damaged manufacturing and jobs, and delivered no meaningful global emissions benefit because other major countries are not following the same path.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
10 speakers · 10 oppose
“I am very pleased to speak on the motion in relation to the Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025 today to help show this for the farce that we all know it is. While the coalition continues to quibble about whether we should or should not have a net zero target, industry and our community are forging ahead with making net zero a reality. What we need to do is secure the jobs of the future in the clean tech space, and I've worked hard to make sure that the Illawarra can seize those opportunities. I have spent the last three years working with both traditional and emerging industry to ensure that our region is at the forefront of this energy transition. This means not having all our eggs in one basket but investing in the knowledge and expertise of those working hard for our clean energy future.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Hunter has always been the engine room of New South Wales. We powered the state through coal, and now we're proving we can lead the way to net zero as well—not by shutting down but by stepping up, not by walking away but by making smart choices. That is what net zero means for us. That's why it's good for the Hunter and that's why we'll continue to support it all away. To the coalmining community out there: remember, for as long as people want to buy our coal we'll always supply it to them. We have the best coal in the world, and we need to make sure we keep using it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Those opposite say they understand the science of climate change, but what are they going to say to their communities about their lack of action on climate change? A lack of a target or plan shows they don't care. It isn't a priority. To say, 'If it does happen, it would be welcome,' is an insulting crumb thrown from the table to keep the supplicants quiet. To those who say they care about the costs of electricity, what will you say to the households, businesses and industries in their electorates about a credible way to replace the energy generation that left the system under your watch or announced its imminent closure under your watch? When the evidence is there that coal and gas are an expensive form of generation and that nuclear is the most expensive form of generation for a country like Australia, how can they seriously look at the renewables transformation already well underway and say they want to stop progress? Will they look in the eyes of the next generation—our children, our grandchildren—and show them a glossy brochure with no substance, no plans, no targets and only the meaningless word 'welcome'? How insulting!”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We know what doing nothing looks like. Research shows household power bills could rise by $449 a year by 2030 if Australia slows renewable investment and leans on coal and gas. Prices could climb by more than $600 a year if a major coal plant fails unexpectedly. Treasury warns that abandoning net zero would mean lower growth, fewer jobs, higher prices and less investment. A disorderly transition would cost the economy $1.2 trillion by 2050. Recent research shows that electricity prices today would be 50 per cent higher if Australia had relied entirely on coal and gas instead of investing in renewables.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to speak on the Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025. The member for New England has described this government's goal to reach net zero by 2050 as 'a lunatic crusade' and 'treacherous'. I think he needs to take a good look in the mirror, because that's where he will see someone that is, quite frankly, completely out of touch with regional Australia. This government's ambitious plan to tackle climate change will help all Australians, no matter where they live. The member for New England says that regional people are furious, but I say that he needs to open his eyes and look at the impact that climate change is having, with fires, floods and drought. Yes, people are hurting. Yes, farmers are hurting. Yes, small businesses are hurting. That's why we need to take action right now.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“There's another area where the member for New England ignores the facts, and that's on the use of rural land for renewables projects. For instance, in New South Wales, the Agriculture Commissioner estimates that just 0.1 per cent of rural land is needed for new energy infrastructure by 2050. We know with certainty that worsening drought and extreme weather are far worse for farmers and food prices. The opportunity of carbon credits, which are being embraced more by regional Australians looking to diversify incomes than by anyone else, is a significant counterbalance. The biggest threat to agriculture isn't net zero; it's doing nothing. That's the choice the Liberals and Nationals will make in their vote on this bill being put forward by the member for New England. Will they choose to abandon net zero targets to fearmonger without facts and stand in the way of renewable projects or will they stand with Australians who want a better future?”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It's not Halloween just yet, but it's getting scarier and scarier on the other side of the chamber. It says everything you need to know about the coalition that their ideological compass post election has seemingly been set by the member for New England, even when he's no longer sitting in their party room. So lacking are they in any positive vision for the future that they're outsourcing their policy direction to Senator Canavan and One Nation not just to repeal Labor's progress on climate action but to undo even the commitments made under prime ministers Morrison and Howard. While the Albanese government's first piece of legislation was to cut student debt by 20 per cent, the coalition's first priority is to repeal Australia's net zero target, a move that would damage our economy, our environment and our international credibility. Don't just take my word for it. At the Queensland LNP convention this year, an overwhelming majority voted for the federal coalition to abandon net zero, describing it as a 'dangerous scam'. Not one elected MP or senator spoke in favour of keeping the net zero policy at the federal level—not one.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This motion is nothing more than climate denialism. It is reckless. It is dangerous. It betrays the very Australians who want their kids and their grandkids to inherit a safe, livable planet. People in my electorate of Newcastle and, indeed, right across the country know the cost of inaction. They've lived through the bushfires, the floods and the record-breaking heat waves. They understand that climate change is not some distant threat; it is here now, and it is hurting us. What's the coalition's answer? They pretend climate change is not happening. They're ripping up commitments, walking away from jobs and leaving our economy stranded in the past.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“By endorsing Labor's plan in May, Aussies have made a very clear statement to the world that Australia is the place to do business if you're looking to use clean energy to create prosperity. That is why this bill, the Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025, is so bizarre. It goes against the will of the people and it is antibusiness. Responsible emissions targets are essential to Australian jobs. Australia's trading partners, particularly those in Europe and Asia, are more and more demanding that the places they trade with act responsibly. If we don't act, we risk being left behind.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Yes, the member for New England once stood up for the bush. He stood for independence, decency and the right to have a go. But this bill is not that. It's not maverick; it's mimicry. It's not rebellion but retreat—a retreat that would leave this country he loves weaker, poorer and more divided. Now we see it plainly: the retreat is complete. Australia deserves better. The bush deserves better. This parliament must do better. I oppose this bill because standing up for regional Australia means standing up its future, not dragging it back into someone else's past.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
9 speakers · 10 contributions · 9 support
“I thank my Nats colleagues for raising this very important subject as a national debate. They often view it through a regional lens. We heard that in the comments from the previous speaker. I am going to cast an engineering lens across this policy and explain to you why I have strongly opposed it from day one, standing side by side, by the way, with the member for Wide Bay all the way through, and I thank him for his support.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I put this to the chamber. Of course, I can say it now because I'm not bound by cabinet solidarity; I acknowledge that. Maybe it was cowardly of me in the past; I acknowledge that. But I've got to do it now, and others are going to do it as well. I commend this bill to the House, and now I'll let the seconder speak.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This legislation is not about denying climate change; it's about defending the Australian people from a policy that is impoverishing them. It's about sovereignty, affordability and fairness. It's about putting Australians first. Our duty in this place is to put the people of Australia first, not the global climate lobby. Our responsibility is to ensure affordable power, secure jobs and a strong nation. Net zero has failed economically, strategically and morally. The House must have the courage to end it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The member for McMahon may have a mandate, but he doesn't have a mandate to ruin regional Australia. He does not. I have to say this is just a complete nonsense. It's not going to change the weather. That's why I support the bill from the member for New England.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise today to speak in support of the Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025. My electorate of O'Connor is ground zero for net zero. We've already seen the total demise of the nickel industry, with 14 out of 16 nickel mines in my electorate closing thanks to cheap, dirty nickel being produced in Indonesia. Of the two remaining facilities, Murrin Murrin has lost $61 million in the last six months and has just declined a $35 million government grant to transform its gas-fired power to renewables. The iconic Kalgoorlie nickel smelter and Goldfields nickel mines are shuttered, and the Ravensthorpe First Quantum nickel mine and processing operation on the south coast has folded.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Well, Prime Minister, why won't you own this? Why won't you take responsibility, as you promised the Australian people you would? If you did, you'd do the right thing by Australians and dump your net zero agenda that has pushed power prices up while seeing emissions flatline and Aussie jobs exported overseas.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Voting to stop this blind obsession with net zero doesn't mean you don't believe in climate change. It doesn't mean you're a good citizen. It just means that you are reassessing and looking at the world around us, our global environment, that is saying that this is not working. It's saying that you want to make Australia resilient as we go into an uncertain future; that's what it is saying. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Colin Boyce on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Colin Boyce supports the bill and says net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. should be scrapped because he believes it will damage coal, gas and manufacturing jobs, raise power costs and hurt regional communities and industry.
“I second the motion, and I rise to support this Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025 put forward by my colleague the member for New England, Barnaby Joyce. He is absolutely right. Net zero, ultimately, will destroy our economic base here in Australia. The questions that I want to ask are: What will it cost? What will it cost in manufacturing jobs? What will it cost to the prosperity of ordinary Australians?”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Colin Boyce supports the bill to scrap net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050., arguing the issue is not climate change itself but the economic damage and taxpayer cost he says net zeroA target to balance the greenhouse gases Australia releases with reductions or removals, so overall emissions reach zero by 2050. policies would impose on jobs, industry and energy projects.
“by leave—I rise to support the Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025, presented by my colleague the member for New England at the last sitting. Unfortunately, this bill has revolved around an argument that if you don't believe in net zero, you don't believe in climate change. I want to put that to bed right now. Climate change is real and is happening right now. Climate change is variable; the earth's geological history tells us that. The earth's climate has been changing ever since the earth began on Thursday afternoon 4.54 billion years ago. So this debate is not about whether you believe in climate change. This is about the economic cost of getting to a position of net zero by 2050.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 2 oppose
“This does not bode well for the future prospects of the coalition or for the economic future of the country. Returning to the climate wars is economic sabotage and a political dead end. Businesses and investors are ready and willing to invest in the industries of the future, but they need policy certainty, not mixed messages, from our politicians. The coalition as a whole must decide if it's in favour of Australia having a flourishing economic future on a livable planet or against it. Net zero is not a burden; it's a blueprint for a better future. It's a framework for innovation, job creation, regional development and environmental stewardship. I urge the coalition and the House to reject this bill, reaffirm its commitment to net zero and help build a flourishing economic future on a livable planet.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise today to oppose the Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025. First introduced by the member for New England in his individual capacity, this is now the official stance of the coalition. This bill would unravel Australia's emissions reduction framework without putting anything else in place. It would close the Net Zero Economy Authority, which supports the workforce transition across regional Australia. It would repeal vehicle efficiency standards that drive down fuel costs. Turning away from renewables would jeopardise almost $10 billion in direct payments to farmers and landholders by 2050. It would rob regional communities and councils of another $1.9 billion in community benefit-sharing programs. It would threaten the thousands of jobs expected to be created in the next five years. There is no alternative proposal nor positive vision for the future—just repeal, rescind and omit.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Removed from the Notice Paper in accordance with (SO 42)
Removed from the Notice PaperThe official daily list of business before the House of Representatives; removal from it ended this bill's recorded progress. in accordance with (SO 42)
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
