Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates)

Current status

This bill became law on Aug 29th, 2025.

Policy area

Work & employment

What does this bill do?

Workers covered by modern awards get stronger protection against cuts to their penalty ratesExtra pay for working times such as weekends, public holidays, nights, early mornings or shifts that are treated as less desirable hours. and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. when the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. changes awards.

Why was it introduced?

Loopholes in modern awards let employers roll penalty and overtime entitlements into a single pay rate that may not fairly compensate awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement.-reliant workers. The bill requires the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. to protect specified penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. when changing awards and prevents reductions after commencement.

Broader context

Modern awards already set penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement., but employer applications before the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. sought to trade some of those entitlements for higher ordinary pay, including in retail, clerical and banking awards. Labor made the issue a 2025 election commitment, the government moved quickly after taking office, amended the bill after backlash over its reach, and the new Act was later cited by unions in work-from-home awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. proceedings.

Key criticism

The main criticism was that the bill could lock in penalty and overtime rules too rigidly, overriding the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. and making it harder to use higher rolled-up salariesA single higher pay rate or salary that is meant to cover separate entitlements such as penalties, overtime or allowances; the bill targets rolled-up rates that leave any worker worse off., flexible hours or productivity-focused awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. changes. Crossbench and Coalition speakers, business groups and later reporting raised these concerns, while most critics said they supported protecting workers from being worse off in principle.

Who supported it?

Hon Amanda Rishworth MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in House 24 July 2025
Passed House 31 July 2025
Passed Senate 28 Aug 2025
Became law 29 Aug 2025

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 29 Aug 2025

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

11 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Passage speed

36 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Workers covered by modern awards get stronger protection against cuts to their penalty ratesExtra pay for working times such as weekends, public holidays, nights, early mornings or shifts that are treated as less desirable hours. and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. when the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. changes awards.

  2. Modern awards cannot replace penalty or overtime entitlements with a single pay rate if that would leave any employee with less extra pay.

  3. The Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. still does not have to add penalty or overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. to every modern awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement..

  4. Individual flexibility agreements and Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. changes that only fix unclear wording or errors in awards can still operate.

  5. The new protections apply to Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. decisions made after commencement, including decisions on applications already lodged and existing awards.

Show source excerpts
  1. (a) the rate of a penalty rate or an overtime rate that employees are entitled to receive is not reduced; and
    Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Act 2025 final Act text
  2. (b) modern awards do not include terms that substitute employees’ entitlements to receive penalty rates or overtime rates where those terms would have the effect of reducing the additional remuneration referred to in paragraph 134(1)(da) that any employee would otherwise receive.
    Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Act 2025 final Act text
  3. (3) Nothing in subsection (1) requires the FWC to exercise its powers under this Part to make, vary or revoke modern awards.
    Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Act 2025 final Act text
  4. (2) Subsection (1) does not limit the operation of section 144 (flexibility terms) or section 160 (which deals with variation to remove ambiguities or correct errors).
    Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Act 2025 final Act text
  5. The amendments made by Schedule 1 to the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Act 2025 apply in relation to the exercise of the FWC’s powers under Part 2‑3 to make, vary or revoke a modern award on and after the commencement of that Schedule, including in relation to:
    Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Act 2025 final Act text

Broader context for this bill

Modern awards already set penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement., but employer applications before the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. sought to trade some of those entitlements for higher ordinary pay, including in retail, clerical and banking awards. Labor made the issue a 2025 election commitment, the government moved quickly after taking office, amended the bill after backlash over its reach, and the new Act was later cited by unions in work-from-home awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. proceedings.

  1. 18 Apr 2025

    Labor promises to ban awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. penalty-rate cuts

    The Australian Financial Review reported that Labor would legislate if re-elected to stop the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. cutting existing awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. penalty ratesExtra pay for working times such as weekends, public holidays, nights, early mornings or shifts that are treated as less desirable hours., in response to employer applications in retail, clerical and banking awards.

    Australian Financial Review ↗
  2. 04 June 2025

    Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. considers delaying retail penalty-rates ruling

    After Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth wrote to the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. saying legislation was imminent, the CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. considered delaying a retail case about waiving penalty ratesExtra pay for working times such as weekends, public holidays, nights, early mornings or shifts that are treated as less desirable hours. in exchange for a 35 per cent pay rise.

    Australian Financial Review ↗
  3. 24 July 2025

    Government introduces the penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. bill

    Amanda Rishworth introduced the bill and told Parliament it delivered Labor’s election commitment to protect penalty ratesExtra pay for working times such as weekends, public holidays, nights, early mornings or shifts that are treated as less desirable hours. for awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement.-reliant workers.

    Hansard ↗
  4. 30 July 2025

    Industry backlash prompts changes to the bill

    The Australian Financial Review reported that the government was preparing amendments after concerns the bill could affect long-standing awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. arrangements such as annualised salaries and exemptions for higher-paid staff.

    Australian Financial Review ↗
  5. 28 Aug 2025

    Parliament passes the bill

    Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary approval of the new penalty and overtime rate protections.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  6. 29 Aug 2025

    Penalty and overtime protections become law

    Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. turned the bill into an Act, allowing the new limits on Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. changes to apply after commencement.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  7. 08 Oct 2025

    Unions cite the new law in work-from-home awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. proceedings

    The Australian Financial Review reported that unions argued the new protections blocked employer proposals to relax overtime rules in a Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. test case about working from home.

    Australian Financial Review ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 24 July 2025

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 24 July 2025

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 30 July 2025

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate 31 July 2025

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

House second reading agreed 31 July 2025

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

House agreed to amendment packages 31 July 2025

The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.

Consideration in detail debate

House third reading agreed 31 July 2025

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (22/08/2025) review 31 July 2025

Referred to Committee (31/07/2025): Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (22/08/2025)

Referred to committee

APH bill page notes
Introduced 25 Aug 2025

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 25 Aug 2025

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 25 Aug 2025

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate 26 Aug 2025

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate second reading agreed 27 Aug 2025

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Committee of the WholeA Senate stage where senators examine a bill in detail and vote on proposed amendments; the page abbreviates this as CW. debate 27 Aug 2025

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Committee of the WholeA Senate stage where senators examine a bill in detail and vote on proposed amendments; the page abbreviates this as CW. debate 28 Aug 2025

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate third reading agreed 28 Aug 2025

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Passed both houses 28 Aug 2025

Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.

Finally passed both Houses

Assent 29 Aug 2025

The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal approval by the Governor-General that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.

The main case against this bill

The main criticism was that the bill could lock in penalty and overtime rules too rigidly, overriding the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. and making it harder to use higher rolled-up salariesA single higher pay rate or salary that is meant to cover separate entitlements such as penalties, overtime or allowances; the bill targets rolled-up rates that leave any worker worse off., flexible hours or productivity-focused awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. changes. Crossbench and Coalition speakers, business groups and later reporting raised these concerns, while most critics said they supported protecting workers from being worse off in principle.

Criticism focused more on design, scrutiny and flexibility than on opposing penalty-rate protection itself.

Reduced Fair Work Commission independence

Critics argued the bill would tell the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. what awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. outcomes it could not approve, even where the CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. might find a package of higher base pay or changed hours was fair overall.

Raised by Kate Chaney, Allegra Spender, Simon Kennedy and Senator Kovacic’s defeated amendment Source ↗

Less workplace flexibility

A central concern was that the bill could block or discourage arrangements that trade separate penalties for higher ordinary pay, annualised salaries, time off in lieu or work-from-home arrangements involving irregular hours.

Raised by Allegra Spender, employer groups and Australian Financial Review workplace reporting Source ↗

Risk to existing salary arrangements

Reports and industry objections said the bill went further than intended and could let applications unwind long-standing awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. terms that exempt higher-paid staff from penalties or roll penalty ratesExtra pay for working times such as weekends, public holidays, nights, early mornings or shifts that are treated as less desirable hours. into salaries, affecting sectors such as hospitality, health and law.

Raised by Business groups and Australian Financial Review workplace reporting Source ↗

Rushed process and limited impact analysis

Several opponents said the bill was pushed through without enough consultation, committee scrutiny or modelling of effects on small businesses, costs and productivity, and a proposed six-month regulation impact statementA document estimating the likely costs, benefits and effects of a proposed law or regulation, which opponents wanted before or soon after this bill passed. was defeated.

Raised by Tim Wilson, Kate Chaney, Simon Kennedy and Senator Kovacic’s defeated amendment Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

31 July 2025

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

28 Aug 2025

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Amendments at a glance

Amendments grouped by chamber. Expand any amendment to see the party breakdown or, where it passed on the voices, how that works.

House

Defeated

Refer bill to committee inquiry

Aye 42 No 90

Defeated 42 to 90. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and Centre Alliance. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

30 July 2025

The House rejected the referral motion, allowing debate on the bill to continue in the chamber without a committee inquiry.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 85
Liberal Party 21 / 0
Nationals 15 / 0
Unknown 2 / 3
Independent 3 / 1
Greens 0 / 1
Centre Alliance 1 / 0
Defeated

Call for small business impact statement

Aye 42 No 89

Defeated 42 to 89. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and Centre Alliance. Opposition came from Labor. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

31 July 2025

The House rejected the proposed statement, so the second-reading debate continued without adding those criticisms or requests.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 84
Liberal Party 22 / 0
Nationals 14 / 0
Independent 4 / 2
Unknown 1 / 3
Centre Alliance 1 / 0
Defeated

Keep award flexibility and require impact statement

Aye 40 No 93

Defeated 40 to 93. Support came from Liberal Party and Nationals. Opposition came from Labor and Centre Alliance. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

31 July 2025

The House rejected the opposition changes, leaving the government's approach to protecting penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. in place.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 84
Liberal Party 22 / 0
Nationals 14 / 0
Independent 3 / 4
Unknown 1 / 4
Centre Alliance 0 / 1
Carried

Fair Work Commission need not change awards

This amendment clarifies that the bill does not compel the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. to exercise its powers to make, vary, or revoke modern awards.

31 July 2025

This amendment clarifies that the bill does not compel the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. to exercise its powers to make, vary, or revoke modern awards.

Passed on the voices

The chamber agreed to this amendment without a counted vote — the presiding officer judged the ayes louder than the noes, and no member called for a division.

Senate

Defeated

Call to delay bill for impact statement

Aye 27 No 33

Defeated 27 to 33. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

27 Aug 2025

The Senate rejected the statement, so the bill's second reading proceeded without adding that criticism or delay request.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 22
Liberal Party 16 / 0
Greens 0 / 10
Nationals 3 / 0
One Nation 3 / 0
Independent 1 / 1
Unknown 2 / 0
Australia's Voice 1 / 0
UAP 1 / 0
Defeated

Call for work from home rights

Aye 11 No 33

Defeated 11 to 33. Support came from Greens and Australia's Voice. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, One Nation, Nationals, and minor parties and independents.

27 Aug 2025

The Senate rejected the statement, so the bill advanced without adding a call for a new work-from-home right.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 22
Greens 10 / 0
Liberal Party 0 / 3
One Nation 0 / 3
Nationals 0 / 2
Australia's Voice 1 / 0
Independent 0 / 1
UAP 0 / 1
Unknown 0 / 1
Defeated

Call for small business tax relief

Aye 8 No 34

Defeated 8 to 34. Support came from One Nation, Australia's Voice, UAP, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and Liberal Party.

27 Aug 2025

The Senate rejected the statement and then agreed to the bill's second reading, so no small-business tax relief message was added to the motion.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 21
Greens 0 / 10
Liberal Party 0 / 3
One Nation 3 / 0
Independent 2 / 0
Australia's Voice 1 / 0
UAP 1 / 0
Unknown 1 / 0
Defeated

Keep award flexibility for businesses

Aye 25 No 34

Defeated 25 to 34. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and Australia's Voice. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

28 Aug 2025

The Senate rejected the change, leaving the bill's stronger protection model intact rather than writing in broader commissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. discretion.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 22
Liberal Party 16 / 0
Greens 0 / 10
Nationals 3 / 0
One Nation 3 / 0
Independent 1 / 1
Unknown 2 / 0
Australia's Voice 0 / 1
Defeated

Exempt small business from new rules

Aye 26 No 33

Defeated 26 to 33. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

28 Aug 2025

The Senate rejected the carve-out, so small-business employees remained covered by the bill's new awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. protections.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 22
Liberal Party 16 / 0
Greens 0 / 10
Nationals 3 / 0
One Nation 3 / 0
Independent 1 / 1
Unknown 2 / 0
Australia's Voice 1 / 0
Defeated

Require impact review after commencement

Aye 27 No 32

Defeated 27 to 32. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens.

28 Aug 2025

The Senate rejected the review requirement, so the bill did not gain a mandatory post-commencement impact statement.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 22
Liberal Party 16 / 0
Greens 0 / 10
Nationals 3 / 0
One Nation 3 / 0
Independent 2 / 0
Unknown 2 / 0
Australia's Voice 1 / 0
Defeated

Open flexible work requests to everyone

Aye 12 No 29

Defeated 12 to 29. Support came from Greens and Australia's Voice. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, and One Nation. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

28 Aug 2025

The Senate rejected the change, so the bill did not broaden flexible work request rights in that way.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 21
Greens 10 / 0
Liberal Party 0 / 5
Independent 1 / 1
One Nation 0 / 2
Australia's Voice 1 / 0
Defeated

Protect workers in deadlocked bargaining

Aye 13 No 30

Defeated 13 to 30. Support came from Greens, Australia's Voice, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor and Liberal Party. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

28 Aug 2025

The Senate rejected the proposal, and the bill was then agreed to in committee without that extra bargaining protection.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 24
Greens 10 / 0
Liberal Party 0 / 5
Independent 1 / 1
Australia's Voice 1 / 0
One Nation 1 / 0

This list includes amendment votes, procedural votes and votes on the bill itself.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Amanda Rishworth

Australian Labor Party • MP 24 July 2025

Amanda Rishworth strongly supports the bill, saying it will protect penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. for awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement.-reliant workers so their pay cannot be reduced by rolled-up rates or awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. changes.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead opposing voice Opposes

Tim Wilson

Liberal Party • MP 30 July 2025

Tim Wilson opposes the bill, arguing it is badly drafted, was pushed without proper consultation or impact analysis, and will hurt small businesses, flexibility and even workers' pay.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Barbara Pocock

Australian Greens • Senator 25 Aug 2025

Barbara Pocock says the Greens will support the bill because protecting penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. is an important safeguard for low-paid workers, especially women, against losing pay and conditions.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Opposes

Allegra Spender

Independent • MP 30 July 2025

Allegra Spender opposes the bill, saying workers should be fairly paid for unsociable hours but that the measure is unnecessary because existing law already protects those entitlements.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

28 speakers · 30 contributions · 28 support

  1. Shayne Neumann Shayne Neumann says Labor strongly backs the bill because it will stop awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. changes that cut penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. and protect low-paid, awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement.-reliant workers from being worse off.
    “I'm pleased to speak in support of the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Bill 2025. In some countries, politics is divided on the basis of religion or race or culture or geography; in Australian politics, it's really based on the attitude people have to bills like this and to the working men and women of this country. We on this side of the chamber represent the working-class people—compare that to the attitude of those opposite in relation to this issue.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 30 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Varun Ghosh Varun Ghosh strongly backs the bill, saying it will protect penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. for millions of low-paid, awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement.-reliant workers who depend on that extra pay to cover basic living costs.
    “The failure to stop the erosion of this fundamental entitlement and these minimal conditions for our lowest paid workers will likely see more employer groups pursue similar arrangements. It'll extrapolate. But one thing I can tell you to near certainty—to the extent that predictions can be certain—is that the result will be that lower paid workers will be paid even less. That's always what sits underneath these attempts to strip away protections. Workers on the downside of advantage do not bargain with their employers from a position of equality. And it's that inequality that people who strip away basic conditions seek to exploit. It's why we need to pass this bill.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 26 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Julie-Ann Campbell Julie-Ann Campbell strongly supports the bill and urges its quick passage because she says it will stop cuts to penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. for awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. workers, especially lower-paid workers in sectors now before the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied..
    “It is important that this bill be passed urgently so the Fair Work Commission can apply the amended legislation to the cases of the retail, clerical and banking sectors that are currently before it. The amended legislation will come into effect the day after it receives royal assent, reflecting both this urgency to protect working people and the Albanese Labor government's commitment to implementing our election promises, something that we have seen again and again in these first two sitting weeks. This bill ensures the fair and decent treatment of award based workers, hardworking Australians who rely on penalty rates and overtime rates every single day.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 31 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Marielle Smith Marielle Smith supports the bill and says it will protect the penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. of 2.6 million awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement.-reliant workers who depend on that pay to cover living costs.
    “I also rise to speak on the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Bill 2025. Our government has a proud history of delivering fairer pay and better conditions for Australian workers, and this bill continues that work. It delivers on our election commitment to protect the penalty rates and overtime of some 2.6 million modern award workers in Australia, many of whom rely on their penalty rates and their overtime to make ends meet.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 26 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Steve Georganas Steve Georganas strongly supports the bill, saying it will protect workers from losing penalty and overtime pay that many low-paid, casual and shift workers rely on to cover living costs.
    “I'm very proud to be here speaking on this bill, the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Bill 2025, which protects workers' penalty rates. I do so because it's an important bill for my electorate, especially, and for everyone's electorate as it amends the Fair Work Act 2009 to legislate protections to ensure that penalty and overtime rates in modern awards cannot be reduced or substituted by another term that would reduce employees' take-home pay. Our workers, who rely on overtime and penalty rates, deserve nothing less. That's why I'm supporting this bill and why all of us on this side are supporting the bill.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 30 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Anthony Chisholm Anthony Chisholm strongly backs the bill, saying it delivers Labor's election promise to protect penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. so low-paid awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. workers cannot be left worse off by rolled-up pay arrangements.
    “This legislation will mean that proposals like these cannot be included in modern awards, which act as our safety net, and ensures penalty and overtime rates of low paid workers are protected.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 25 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Deborah O'Neill Deborah O'Neill backs the bill and says it should pass because it will stop employers cutting or trading away penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. for millions of awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement.-reliant workers, especially people working unsociable hours.
    “That's why this bill should pass. It's a bill that will protect the penalty rates of 2.6 million modern-award-reliant workers in this country. These are our fellow citizens, serving the public, in hospitality and retail predominantly, working irregular hours, unsociable hours. For that, Australians designed a compact and the concept of penalty rates—some compensation for stopping your social interaction in the normal hours. The people who are going to oppose it, for goodness sake, I bet aren't working on a Sunday. I bet they're not down at Coles at Manuka putting in their hours at 10 o'clock at night. Maybe they didn't ever have to. Maybe they have no compassion or empathy for the Australian people. I cannot understand why anyone would vote against this bill. Anyone in their right mind, anyone with a sense of fairness and decency, would support what this bill will do. This benefits 2.6 million of our fellow Australians who rely on penalty rate entitlements to help them make ends meet, to pay their bills and to support their families. They're counting on us to deliver for them.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 25 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Madonna Jarrett Madonna Jarrett supports the bill and says it will stop the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. from cutting penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement., protecting millions of low-paid and awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement.-reliant workers who depend on that pay to make ends meet.
    “I rise to support the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Bill 2025. On this side of the House, we will always stand up for working people. At the election, we committed to protecting penalty rates, and now the government is delivering on that promise. If you work weekends, public holidays, early mornings, late nights and rely on penalty rates through the modern award safety net, you deserve to have your penalty wages protected.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 31 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  9. Sharon Claydon Sharon Claydon strongly supports the bill and wants it passed because she says workers should not lose penalty or overtime pay through enterprise agreements.
    “This is what Labor governments do. We stand up for workers, legislate for fairness and deliver for working people. I commend this bill to the House. Let's protect penalty rates, let's protect overtime and let's keep building a country where no worker is left behind and every worker gets to have a fair go.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 30 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  10. Emma McBride Emma McBride strongly backs the bill and says it should pass urgently to stop employers and the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. from cutting awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. for low-paid workers.
    “As I said, there is an urgency. This is something that is a top priority for our government. It's something that we committed to in the election campaign. It's something that we're doing right now in this first sitting fortnight because some employers in the retail, clerical and banking sectors have made applications to the commission to trade away the penalty rates of lower-paid workers and leave some workers worse off. That's why we want to see this legislation passed as soon as possible—so that the commission is able to apply this principle in considering those proposals.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 31 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  11. Patrick Gorman Patrick Gorman supports the bill and says it should pass because it will protect penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. for millions of workers who depend on that pay to make ends meet.
    “I speak in support of the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Bill 2025, as introduced by the minister, because millions of workers will benefit from that bill. Penalty rates are not an optional extra; they are essential to the household budgets of millions of Australians. People across this country rely on penalty rates, and that is why the minister and this government seek to protect them.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 31 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  12. Carina Garland Carina Garland strongly supports the bill and says it should pass quickly because it will stop modern awards from trading away penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement., protecting low-paid workers from being worse off.
    “This bill here before the House is about making sure that we are taking action to ensure that the best interests of workers is at the heart of our workplace relations system. This legislation will mean that proposals, as I mentioned earlier, to undermine worker pay cannot be included in modern awards. It's really ensuring that the safety net remains. We are going to protect the penalty rates and overtime rates of low-paid workers and enshrine protections for penalty rates and overtime rates in modern awards. In practical terms, this will mean workers won't have to worry about that safety net. We have done this because Labor governments are committed to strengthening the modern award system without adding unnecessary complexity. The bill will not stop parties engaging in ways to make awards easier or from ensuring that award terms can be adaptable to modern working needs.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 31 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  13. Libby Coker Libby Coker supports the bill and says it will protect workers on modern awards from losing penalty ratesExtra pay for working times such as weekends, public holidays, nights, early mornings or shifts that are treated as less desirable hours. or overtime pay through rolled-up or reduced awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. terms.
    “Let me explain exactly how the bill works. It amends the Fair Work Act to introduce a new section, 135A. It requires the Fair Work Commission to make sure that penalty and overtime rates in awards aren't reduced and that awards don't include terms that substitute those entitlements in a way that cuts take-home pay. This means the commission will still have flexibility to do its work but it will have a clear principle it must follow: protect the pay of workers who rely on penalty and overtime rates. This change is carefully designed. It targets the kinds of changes that would reduce the percentage of pay a worker receives for penalty hours or roll those penalties up into a flat rate that's worth less overall. It doesn't impact individual contracts, it doesn't apply to enterprise agreements and it doesn't stop good faith efforts to modernise awards. It stops pay quietly being cut for the people who can least afford it.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 30 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  14. Ged Kearney Ged Kearney strongly supports the bill, saying it will protect workers' penalty ratesExtra pay for working times such as weekends, public holidays, nights, early mornings or shifts that are treated as less desirable hours. and overtime from being cut through awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. reviews.
    “So gutting penalty rates is not a hypothetical. It is happening, and the bill is a line in the sand. More specifically, this bill enshrines protections for penalty rates and overtime entitlements in the Fair Work Act, making it harder for big business and employer groups to strip them away through award reviews.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 31 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  15. Louise Miller-Frost Louise Miller-Frost strongly backs the bill, saying it will stop awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. changes that cut penalty and overtime pay for low-paid and vulnerable workers who rely on those entitlements.
    “This is a government that has the backs of workers, and we are legislating to make sure workers also benefit from the prosperity of this wonderful country. This bill is about principles of fairness, decency and dignity. It anchors in law a protection that millions of Australians depend upon. It reflects our commitment to safeguarding lowest-paid workers amid economic pressures A and it reaffirms the integrity of Australia's modern award system. I'd like to thank the minister for this latest tranche of legislation, and I commend the bill to the House.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 31 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  16. Gordon Reid Gordon Reid strongly backs the bill, saying it will protect workers’ penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. and ensure lower-paid Australians are fairly paid for weekend, public holiday and other unsociable work.
    “The bill will commence the day after it receives royal assent, reflecting the government's election commitment to move quickly to protect penalty rates and overtime rates for Australia's lowest-paid workers. It will ensure award-reliant workers continue to be fairly compensated for working overtime; unsocial, irregular or unpredictable hours; weekends, public holidays or shifts.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 31 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  17. Murray Watt Murray Watt says Labor strongly supports the bill and wants it passed because it protects awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. workers from losing penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. through rolled-up pay arrangements.
    “In conclusion, for many award-reliant employees, penalty and overtime rates are a critical part of their take-home pay. As we know, it's low-paid workers, women and young people—as well as those working in retail and hospitality, who often work unsociable and irregular hours—who are more likely to be reliant on awards. This bill is about fairness. It's about respecting the millions of Australians who work public holidays, weekends, late nights and early mornings. If you get your penalty rates, you deserve them. This bill is about making sure the safety net does what it's meant to do—protect those who need it most. On that basis, I commend the bill to the Senate.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 26 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  18. Jana Stewart Jana Stewart strongly supports the bill and urges the Senate to pass it, saying it will stop employers from cutting or trading away penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. that millions of workers rely on to cover basic living costs.
    “Let's pass this bill. Let's protect penalty and overtime rates. Let's do the right thing by the people who do right by this country every single day. I commend the bill to the Senate.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 26 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  19. Tania Lawrence Tania Lawrence supports the bill and says it is needed to stop employers and the opposition from undermining penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. that many low paid, casual and young workers rely on.
    “We on this side want to protect the safety nets we have in place. We want to protect workers' rights and their families. We don't want our hospitality workers working all night for drinks and just tips. This legislation protects penalty rates. It doesn't extend them but it ensures that they can't be given away under undue pressure. The legislation doesn't hold good businesses back but it does ensure that there are no workers left behind.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 30 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  20. Ellie Whiteaker Ellie Whiteaker strongly supports the bill, saying it will stop employers from folding penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. into flat pay deals that leave workers worse off and will protect retail and hospitality workers who rely on those extra wages.
    “The government's penalty rates bill enshrines a clear principle. Penalty and overtime rates cannot be rolled into a single rate of pay if workers are left worse off. It protects against schemes that offer a higher base pay in exchange for forfeiting those penalty rates—evenings, early mornings, weekends—while still allowing flexibility in the award, so long as workers are not financially disadvantaged and so long as workers are not left worse off under these arrangements. What this means is that this legislation protects workers, supports the economy and strengthens the stability of our workforce.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 25 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  21. Ali France Ali France backs the bill and says it is needed to stop big employers cutting penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. for low-paid awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. workers.
    “The safeguards in the enterprise bargaining framework remain unchanged. Parties will still be able to bargain at the enterprise level to reduce existing penalty rates and overtime rates, so long as the commission is satisfied the enterprise agreement meets the better off overall test, ensuring that the take-home pay of these low-paid workers is not reduced. That's incredibly important. I say to the people of Dickson who are working this weekend: you've earned every single cent of your penalty rates. Thanks to this bill, we will help protect that right.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 31 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  22. Carol Brown Carol Brown supports the bill and wants it passed quickly because she says it will stop the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied. from allowing awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. changes that cut penalty and overtime pay for low-paid workers.
    “Under the Liberal-National government that safety net is always under threat. Right now there are active applications before the Fair Work Commission from employer groups in the retail, banking and clerical sectors seeking to trade away penalty rates and overtime. They want to roll these entitlements into so-called all-in pay rates, leaving workers worse off. This bill puts a stop to that. It will amend the Fair Work Act to insert a new section which requires the Fair Work Commission to ensure that penalty and overtime rates in modern awards are not reduced and that modern awards do not include terms that substitute or trade away those entitlements, where doing so would reduce the extra pay a worker would otherwise receive. This change is urgent. We want the bill passed quickly so it can apply to decisions currently before the commission. If passed, it will mean that those attempts to undermine penalty rates cannot succeed.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 26 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  23. Corinne Mulholland Corinne Mulholland strongly supports the bill, saying it will protect workers' penalty ratesExtra pay for working times such as weekends, public holidays, nights, early mornings or shifts that are treated as less desirable hours. and overtime from being cut and is needed to defend low-paid Australians' wages and basic fairness.
    “That's why the Albanese government believes in a fair wage for a fair day's work. We believe that productivity comes from empowering workers, not impoverishing them. We believe that protecting penalty rates and overtime is not only good economics; it is the very essence of Australian fairness. And I say to those opposite: if you believe in a fair go, if you believe in hard work being rewarded, if you believe in our national story, vote for this bill. In fact, I don't think anyone can in good conscience vote against this bill. On behalf of every worker who clocks in on a Sunday or on a public holiday, on behalf of those staying back late at night, and on behalf of everyone working overtime to support their family, I will be voting to support this bill to support their rights and their wages.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 25 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  24. Helen Polley 2 contributions Helen Polley supports the bill and says it should pass because penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. are vital for low-paid workers who give up weekends, nights and public holidays, especially in retail.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Helen Polley on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • Senator • 25 Aug 2025

    Helen Polley supports the bill and says it should pass because penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. are vital for low-paid workers who give up weekends, nights and public holidays, especially in retail. She argues the law is needed to stop employers trading away those entitlements and cutting workers' take-home pay.

    “I rise to speak on the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Bill 2025 and, in doing so, recognise fairness, sacrifice and an important role penalty rates play in people's lives within our industrial relations system. I'd like to have my name associated with the good senator's contribution tonight. This bill delivers on the Albanese Labor government's key election commitment to protect the penalty rates of around 2.6 million modern-award-reliant workers. The reform will amend the Fair Work Act 2009 to legislate protection to ensure that penalty rates and overtime rates in modern awards cannot be reduced or substituted by another term that would reduce an employee's take-home pay.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Australian Labor Party • Senator • 26 Aug 2025

    Helen Polley supports the bill, saying it gives stronger protection to workers’ penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. by stopping awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. changes that would leave any employee worse off. She argues it is a simple, fair safeguard that protects retail workers without adding new obligations beyond existing awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement. requirements.

    “The bill would provide stronger protection than the status quo in the following ways. The principle is applied over and above the commission's consideration of the modern award objectives, overriding any decision that would rule in favour of provisions that have the effect of reducing penalty rates and overtime rates. The test applies to the additional remuneration that any employee would otherwise receive, meaning that a provision cannot be in a modern award if there is evidence of a single employee that would be worse off. There is also currently no legal definition of exemption rate clauses in modern awards. Section 135A(1)(b) therefore applies a higher level principle to ensure the commission is focused on the desired policy outcomes, ensuring employees' rights to penalty and overtime rates are not diminished. Otherwise, the legislation would need to attempt to define the various types of clauses across all modern awards, which would narrow the principle and could have unintended consequences.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  25. Josh Dolega Josh Dolega backs the bill and urges the Senate to pass it because he says workers who rely on weekend, public holiday and overtime pay need stronger legal protection from loopholes that can leave them worse off.
    “This bill strengthens that safety net. It ensures that workers aren't disadvantaged by technicalities or loopholes, and it does so without adding unnecessary complexity. Employees and employers can still negotiate flexibility, but not at the expense of fairness. This bill doesn't go after or unfairly treat many of the great small businesses that do the right thing and that value and reward their workers. It just protects the status quo.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 26 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  26. Michelle Ananda-Rajah Michelle Ananda-Rajah strongly supports the bill, saying it will stop penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. being cut or rolled into flat pay rates and will protect low-paid, awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement.-reliant workers.
    “The Albanese government has done a power of work to secure the wages of working Australians. This bill today feeds into and complements the other work we have done in respect of banning wage secrecy, banning labour hire and backing in consecutive increases to the minimum wage, which has seen real wages rise for seven consecutive quarters, despite us also navigating this country through a nasty inflationary and cost-of-living crisis. We are here for working Australians. We are here to protect our most vulnerable workers and our most essential workers from future erosion of their pay. I commend this bill to the Senate.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 26 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  27. Dorinda Cox Dorinda Cox supports the bill, saying it will protect penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. for millions of awardA legal document that sets minimum pay and conditions for a type of job or industry, used as the safety net for employees not covered by a better workplace agreement.-reliant workers and stop employers using flexibility arrangements to leave people worse off.
    “This parliament has a responsibility to stand up for those workers, and this bill does just that. It locks in protections for around 2.6 million Australians whose pay and conditions are set by modern awards. It sends a clear message: we value your work and we will not allow it to be undermined. This government was elected with a commitment to restore fairness to the workplace relations system, to lift real wages and improve conditions and to strengthen the safety net, and this bill is a practical expression of that commitment. It is about saying, 'Never again will penalty rates and overtime be eroded through the back door of so-called flexibility.'”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 26 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

5 speakers · 5 oppose

  1. Dave Sharma Dave Sharma says the coalition will oppose the bill because he believes it would take away workers' choice and flexibility, interfere with the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied., and add unnecessary burdens for business.
    “If you are a worker now and you want to work flexibly—if you want to clock on at seven in the morning to do some work, prepare a submission, prepare some points, do some letters or deal with correspondence so you can then take your children to school at nine o'clock, take your elderly grandparent to a medical appointment, go do your groceries or go to the dentist—is an employer going to have to pay you overtime now? Is an employer going to want to support flexible working-from-home arrangements if they are going to have to require that time sheets be kept and if they are going to have to accommodate your flexibility by paying you more? The answer is simply no. What this bill will do is deny workers freedom, choice and agency, and that is why the coalition does not support this bill.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 25 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Maria Kovacic Maria Kovacic says the coalition will not support the bill as it stands because she argues it is unnecessary, adds red tape for small business, weakens the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied.'s discretion and reduces workplace flexibility.
    “This government should be legislating for the workers of Australia not for some headlines around protecting penalty rates, which are already protected. I say it again: the coalition is in favour of protecting penalty rates. We are not opposed to penalty rates. This is a solution in search of a problem. The system is already working. We believe that there should be a comprehensive regulatory impact statement before the passage of this bill. We believe that small businesses should be exempt from the operation of this bill, and we believe that the Fair Work Commission should keep its discretion to approve higher pay and simpler conditions supported by both employers and employees—their right to determine themselves what it is that they want in their employment agreements, the flexibility that they want and that meets their needs.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 25 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Sarah Henderson Sarah Henderson opposes the bill, arguing it would hurt small and family businesses, reduce worker choice and flexibility, and add unnecessary uncertainty and red tape.
    “I do want to make this very important point. The Fair Work Commission already has adequate powers to safeguard penalty rates through the better off overall test. This bill is a solution looking for a problem. The bill has arisen as a result of the retail industry wanting to pay their workers 35 per cent more. Labor has introduced this bill to kneecap this attempt to pay workers more, because it would undermine the influence and power of the unions. So here we have a sector in our economy wanting to reward workers, and the government—because, as we know, every Labor senator in this place is a representative of the union—come in here and they undertake and fulfil their union business and agenda. But, of course, the unions don't care about small business. This government doesn't care about small business. This bill is further evidence of this. The bill would enable unions to bring applications to vary existing awards, placing an unfair burden on employers trying to maintain stability for their businesses and their employees. This adds considerable red tape to small business, which already faces 35 major Fair Work Act changes under Labor, 34 of which disproportionately affect small business.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 26 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Simon Kennedy Simon Kennedy opposes the bill as it stands, arguing the government has rushed it without proper consultation, committee scrutiny or modelling of the impact on small business.
    “I'm moving an amendment to the amendment moved by the member for Wentworth, as circulated in my name, because this government has failed to meaningfully consult Australian small businesses on the impact of this bill. We're condemning the government for refusing to allow this bill to be referred to a parliamentary committee for proper scrutiny and stakeholder input.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 31 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Greens

2 speakers · 2 support

  1. Larissa Waters Larissa Waters says the Greens will support the bill because it protects workers' penalty and overtime ratesExtra pay for working more than the ordinary hours allowed by an award or agreement. during a cost-of-living crisis, but argues it does not go far enough on insecure work and will move an amendment to add a right to work from home.
    “The Greens will be supporting this bill because it's incredibly important to stop the further erosion of pay and conditions for workers. What this bill doesn't do is address the big challenges of the modern workplace: casualisation, insecure work, gig economy exploitation and the need for greater flexibility on workers' terms. So my esteemed colleague Senator Barbara Pocock will be moving amendments to this bill. In particular, there is one amendment to add emphasis to some issues that were raised in the inquiry into this bill. That amendment will give Labor the opportunity to not just protect existing entitlements but enshrine new rights for workers.”

    Australian Greens • Senator • 26 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

3 speakers · 1 support · 2 oppose

  1. Tammy Tyrrell Tammy Tyrrell says she will support the bill because she thinks it will give some workers a modest gain and affect relatively few businesses in the short term.
    “Straight off the bat, I support the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Bill 2025 and will be voting in favour of it, but, to be honest, I wish that we in the Senate knew more about it. The government has decided not to share with us a regulatory impact statement. Normally, a regulatory impact statement would tell us the impact the government is predicting that a change to the rules will have. Those effects would include how many jobs will be impacted, how many businesses will be affected or the extent to which the changes will make the regulations more or less complex. You'd think that all these effects would be important. After all, your intentions don't guarantee your outcome. If a doctor gives you a prescription that makes things worse, you don't give them a pass mark for giving it a red-hot crack. You change doctors, because, when you're playing with live ammunition, what matters isn't your intentions but your impact.”

    Independent • Senator • 26 Aug 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Kate Chaney Kate Chaney opposes the bill, saying it is being rushed through without proper scrutiny and would add more complexity to workplace law while overriding the Fair Work CommissionThe independent workplace tribunal that sets and changes modern awards, including deciding whether award penalty and overtime terms can be varied.'s independent role.
    “In short, there are complexities here, and they deserve to be investigated rather than having the bill rushed through the day after it's introduced to override a potential Fair Work Commission decision. In the context of an already far-too-complicated industrial relations framework, this is just more complexity. For these reasons, I cannot support the bill. I urge the government to respect the independence of the Fair Work Commission and allow it to do the job it was created to do.”

    Independent • MP • 30 July 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat