Whistleblower Protection Authority

Current status

This bill did not become law and is no longer proceeding.

Policy area

Law, justice & rights

What does this bill do?

The bill would create a national Whistleblower Protection AuthorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws. to help whistleblowers and potential whistleblowers across all Commonwealth whistleblower protection lawsThe federal laws the bill would bring under one national support body, instead of leaving people to deal with separate schemes..

Why was it introduced?

Australia’s integrity framework lacks a dedicated whistleblower authorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws., leaving people who expose wrongdoing without clear support and vulnerable to mistreatment or reprisals. The bill creates an independent national authorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws. to receive disclosures, help and protect whistleblowers, investigate harm, and oversee how Commonwealth bodies handle cases.

Broader context

Australia already had a patchwork of Commonwealth whistleblower laws, but the bill’s backers argued there was still no single authorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws. to guide, protect and back people who exposed wrongdoing, leaving them vulnerable to mistreatment and making major integrity bodies less effective. Citing recent disclosures such as robodebt and the PwC tax leaks as proof that whistleblowers uncover serious misconduct, the bill proposed a national authorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws. on 10 February 2025, but it lapsed at the dissolution of Parliament on 28 March 2025 before any new body was created.

Key criticism

No significant public case against the bill is recorded so far, and the available debate material focuses on the need for stronger help and protection for whistleblowers. The recorded speakers all supported the proposal, so there is no clearly documented parliamentary criticism beyond the absence of broader debate in this material.

Who supported it?

Andrew Wilkie MPAn elected federal parliamentarian, mentioned in the draft because Andrew Wilkie is identified as an MP. introduced this bill. Speeches supporting it came from some crossbench members.

Introduced in House 10 Feb 2025
Failed in House 28 Mar 2025
Did not reach Senate
Did not become law

Did it become law?

No

The bill did not complete passage through Parliament.

Final passage

No final passage

The bill has not completed passage and is no longer proceeding.

Time before failure

46 days

From introduction to the final recorded step before the bill stopped proceeding

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. The bill would create a national Whistleblower Protection AuthorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws. to help whistleblowers and potential whistleblowers across all Commonwealth whistleblower protection lawsThe federal laws the bill would bring under one national support body, instead of leaving people to deal with separate schemes..

  2. People could report wrongdoing to the Whistleblower Protection CommissionerThe person who would run the Authority and decide how disclosures and retaliation complaints are handled. themselves, through someone else, anonymously, and either by speaking or in writing.

  3. The Whistleblower Protection CommissionerThe person who would run the Authority and decide how disclosures and retaliation complaints are handled. could investigate retaliation or other harm linked to whistleblowing, either alone or together with another government agency.

  4. Whistleblowers could get legal help, representation, and practical support such as non-legal costs, living support, or even a reward.

  5. Parliament would get a dedicated joint committeeThe proposed committee that would review the Commissioner's performance and scrutinise senior appointments. to review how the Whistleblower Protection CommissionerThe person who would run the Authority and decide how disclosures and retaliation complaints are handled. is performing and to scrutinise top appointments.

Show source excerpts
  1. This bill establishes the Whistleblower Protection Authority – a new, independent statutory authority responsible for providing information, advice, assistance, guidance and support to whistleblowers and potential whistleblowers. The Authority will have jurisdiction over all federal whistleblower protection laws.
    Whistleblower Protection Authority explanatory memorandum
  2. Subclause 16(2) enables the person to make a disclosure on behalf of another person, Commonwealth agency or body, or association of persons. It also enables the person to make the disclosure or request anonymously, and either orally or in writing.
    Whistleblower Protection Authority explanatory memorandum
  3. This clause specifies that the Commissioner may deal with an allegation, or information that raises a whistleblower protection issue, by investigating the whistleblower protection issue. They may choose to do this either alone or jointly with another appropriate government agency.
    Whistleblower Protection Authority explanatory memorandum
  4. It also enables the Commissioner to provide or arrange for the provision of legal advice, representation or other practical support to whistleblowers and potential whistleblowers. Practical support may include payments for non-legal costs, services, living support or a reward.
    Whistleblower Protection Authority explanatory memorandum
  5. This clause specifies that the functions of the Committee are to consider the proposed recommendations for the appointment of the Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners; monitor and review the performance of the Commissioner; and report to both Houses of the Parliament on matters connected with the performance of the Commissioner that the Committee thinks appropriate.
    Whistleblower Protection Authority explanatory memorandum

Broader context for this bill

Australia already had a patchwork of Commonwealth whistleblower laws, but the bill’s backers argued there was still no single authorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws. to guide, protect and back people who exposed wrongdoing, leaving them vulnerable to mistreatment and making major integrity bodies less effective. Citing recent disclosures such as robodebt and the PwC tax leaks as proof that whistleblowers uncover serious misconduct, the bill proposed a national authorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws. on 10 February 2025, but it lapsed at the dissolution of Parliament on 28 March 2025 before any new body was created.

  1. 10 Feb 2025

    Australia's integrity system is described as missing a whistleblower authorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws.

    The explanatory memorandumThe supporting document that explains how the bill is meant to work clause by clause. said Australia lacked a dedicated national body to support whistleblowers across Commonwealth laws, leaving people at risk when exposing wrongdoing.

    Whistleblower Protection Authority explanatory memorandum ↗
  2. 10 Feb 2025

    Robodebt and the PwC scandal are cited as proof whistleblowers face risk

    During the second reading debate, supporters said recent disclosures such as robodebt, elder abuse in aged care and the PwC affair showed whistleblowers reveal major wrongdoing but still need stronger protection.

    Hansard ↗
  3. 10 Feb 2025

    House introduction proposes a national Whistleblower Protection AuthorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws.

    The bill was introduced to create an independent authorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws. that could receive disclosures, support whistleblowers, investigate mistreatment and oversee how Commonwealth bodies handle cases.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  4. 28 Mar 2025

    Bill lapses at dissolution

    The proposal fell away when Parliament was dissolved, so the new whistleblower authorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws. and its support powers were not established.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 10 Feb 2025

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 10 Feb 2025

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Scrutiny of Bills review 27 Mar 2025

Considered by scrutiny committee (27/03/2025): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 3 of 2025

Considered by scrutiny committee

APH bill page notes
Lapsed at dissolution 28 Mar 2025

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

The main case against this bill

No significant public case against the bill is recorded so far, and the available debate material focuses on the need for stronger help and protection for whistleblowers. The recorded speakers all supported the proposal, so there is no clearly documented parliamentary criticism beyond the absence of broader debate in this material.

No party represented in the debate material opposed the bill.

Recorded votes

No recorded votes were found before this bill stopped proceeding.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Andrew Wilkie

Independent • MP 10 Feb 2025

Wilkie supports the whistleblower protection bill and urges the House to back it because Australia needs an independent authorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws. to help, protect and investigate whistleblowers.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

David Pocock

Independent • Senator 11 Feb 2025

Pocock strongly supports the bill and says a whistleblower protection authorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws. is long overdue.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Helen Haines

Independent • MP 10 Feb 2025

Haines strongly supports the bill, saying Australia needs a whistleblower protection authorityThe proposed national body that would give whistleblowers advice, support and protection across Commonwealth whistleblowing laws. now because current laws are too weak and leave people like Richard Boyle exposed.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Minor parties and independents

3 speakers · 3 support

Full record

Full chat