Commonwealth Entities (Payment Surcharges) (Consequential Provisions and Other Matters)

Current status

This bill became law on Dec 2nd, 2024.

Policy area

Budget, tax & economy

What does this bill do?

Commonwealth laws that separately let agencies add payment surcharges to some payments are removed for future payments, so one Commonwealth surcharge framework applies instead.

Why was it introduced?

Longstanding Commonwealth surcharges were being charged without clear express legislative authority, leaving past surcharges legally uncertain and future rules split across different laws. This bill backs past surcharges from 1 January 2003, blocks repayment claims by offsetting them with a tax, and removes separate surcharge powers so one Commonwealth framework applies.

Broader context

Since the Reserve Bank began regulating payment surcharging in 2003, Commonwealth entities had long added card surcharges under a patchwork of laws, but the government later concluded the legal footing was not clearly express and wanted a single national-style framework as it weighed wider card-surcharging reform. Introduced after the 15 October 2024 announcement on excessive surcharges and possible debit card changes, the bill validated past Commonwealth surcharges from 1 January 2003, removed separate future surcharge powers and, after Parliament passed it in late November and assent followed on 2 December 2024, left one consistent framework in place.

Key criticism

The main criticism recorded was that the surcharge framework may not give Commonwealth entities enough incentive to comply, weakening its practical effect. That concern came from Angus Taylor, who said the opposition would not oppose the bill in the House but left its Senate position conditional on further talks.

Who supported it?

Hon Dr Andrew Leigh MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in House 25 Nov 2024
Passed House 26 Nov 2024
Passed Senate 28 Nov 2024
Became law 02 Dec 2024

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 02 Dec 2024

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

Members called out ‘aye’ or ‘no’ — no individual votes were recorded.

Passage speed

7 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Commonwealth laws that separately let agencies add payment surcharges to some payments are removed for future payments, so one Commonwealth surcharge framework applies instead.

  2. Payment surcharges charged or collected by Commonwealth entities from 1 January 2003 are retrospectively backed by law, giving legal certainty about past surcharges.

  3. If someone could otherwise claim money back because a Commonwealth entityOn this page, this means a Commonwealth agency or body that can charge a payment surcharge if it has the legal power to collect the underlying payment. was not legally allowed to charge a past surcharge, an equivalent tax is imposed and set off against that repayment.

  4. People will not be able to demand a formal statement of reasons under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act when a Commonwealth entityOn this page, this means a Commonwealth agency or body that can charge a payment surcharge if it has the legal power to collect the underlying payment. charges or refunds a payment surchargeThis is the extra amount added to a payment to recover the cost of processing that payment method, such as a card fee..

Show source excerpts
  1. The Consequential and Other Matters Bill makes various consequential amendments to ensure consistency across Commonwealth legislation by repealing existing provisions that provide authority to charge and collect payment surcharges in relation to certain payments. These consequential amendments only apply in relation to future payments.
    Commonwealth Entities (Payment Surcharges) (Consequential Provisions and Other Matters) explanatory memorandum
  2. The Consequential and Other Matters Bill applies to payment surcharges charged and collected on or after 1 January 2003. This provides legislative certainty in relation to surcharges imposed from when the RBA first regulated payment surcharging. As this maintains the ongoing approach to surcharging by Commonwealth entities, and noting the amount of any surcharge previously paid by any individual is likely to have been minor, this is not likely to materially disadvantage any person.
    Commonwealth Entities (Payment Surcharges) (Consequential Provisions and Other Matters) explanatory memorandum
  3. Where the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth entity would be liable to pay a person an amount as a result the person paying or purportedly paying an amount which a Commonwealth entity charged or purportedly charged as payment surcharge in relation to a base payment which was not a surchargeable payment, that person is liable to pay a payment surcharge tax. The Commonwealth or Commonwealth entity must set off the amount of payment surcharge tax that the person is liable to pay against the liability owed to that person.
    Commonwealth Entities (Payment Surcharges) (Consequential Provisions and Other Matters) explanatory memorandum
  4. The Consequential and Other Matters Bill also amends Schedule 2 to the ADJR Act to provide that a decision by a Commonwealth entity to impose a surcharge, or refund a surcharge, forms part of a class of decisions that are not decisions for which a statement of reasons may be obtained under section 13 of the ADJR Act. The requirement for Commonwealth entities to provide a statement of reasons on request whenever a payment surcharge is charged and collected or refunded would result in a significant, disproportionate and unjustifiable administrative burden given the large number of surcharge payments charged across Commonwealth entities, and the typically small amount of each surcharge. Additionally, any decision by a Commonwealth entity to charge, collect or refund a payment surcharge must take reasonable steps to reflect the whole-of-Government surcharging policy, therefore there is limited discretion for Commonwealth entities when deciding to impose a surcharge in relation to individual cases.
    Commonwealth Entities (Payment Surcharges) (Consequential Provisions and Other Matters) explanatory memorandum

Broader context for this bill

Since the Reserve Bank began regulating payment surcharging in 2003, Commonwealth entities had long added card surcharges under a patchwork of laws, but the government later concluded the legal footing was not clearly express and wanted a single national-style framework as it weighed wider card-surcharging reform. Introduced after the 15 October 2024 announcement on excessive surcharges and possible debit card changes, the bill validated past Commonwealth surcharges from 1 January 2003, removed separate future surcharge powers and, after Parliament passed it in late November and assent followed on 2 December 2024, left one consistent framework in place.

  1. 01 Jan 2003

    Reserve Bank regulation of payment surcharging begins

    The bill was backdated to this starting point because the explanatory memorandum says it aligns with when the Reserve Bank first regulated payment surcharging and Commonwealth entities' longstanding surcharge practices began operating in that setting.

    Commonwealth Entities (Payment Surcharges) (Consequential Provisions and Other Matters) explanatory memorandum ↗
  2. 15 Oct 2024

    Government announces action on excessive surcharges

    The explanatory memorandum says the government announced it was addressing excessive surcharges and was prepared to ban debit card surcharging from 1 January 2026, subject to consultation undertaken by the Reserve Bank.

    Commonwealth Entities (Payment Surcharges) (Consequential Provisions and Other Matters) explanatory memorandum ↗
  3. 25 Nov 2024

    Government introduces the surcharge bills package

    The Assistant Minister said the package would formalise longstanding Commonwealth practice by giving entities express, modernised and consistent authority to keep charging and collecting payment surcharges where they already had authority to collect a payment.

    Hansard ↗
  4. 28 Nov 2024

    Parliament passes the bill

    Passage through both Houses completed the legislative response that backed past surcharges from 1 January 2003 and cleared the way for a single Commonwealth surcharge framework for future payments.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  5. 02 Dec 2024

    Royal AssentThis is the final approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. makes the surcharge changes law

    Royal AssentThis is the final approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act. turned the bill into an Act, locking in the retrospective validation of past surcharges and the repeal of separate future surcharge powers in other Commonwealth laws.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 25 Nov 2024

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 25 Nov 2024

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 26 Nov 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Sent to Federation Chamber for debate 26 Nov 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step. For this bill, the Federation Chamber reported back later the same day and the House then completed its remaining formal steps that day.

Referred to Federation Chamber

Federation Chamber debate 26 Nov 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate

House second reading agreed 26 Nov 2024

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Returned from Federation Chamber without amendment 26 Nov 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step. The official House record shows the referral out and return both happened on the same day, before the House moved to its final formal votes.

Reported from Federation Chamber

House third reading agreed 26 Nov 2024

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 27 Nov 2024

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 27 Nov 2024

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Senate second reading agreed 28 Nov 2024

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Senate third reading agreed 28 Nov 2024

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Passed both houses 28 Nov 2024

Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.

Finally passed both Houses

Assent 02 Dec 2024

The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThis is the final approval that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act., turning the bill into an Act.

Scrutiny of Bills review 05 Feb 2025

Considered by scrutiny committee (05/02/2025): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 1 of 2025. The committee highlighted the retrospective validation of surcharges from 1 January 2003 and the effect of the bill’s fast passage on parliamentary scrutiny.

Considered by scrutiny committee

APH bill page notes and Scrutiny Digest 1 of 2025

The main case against this bill

The main criticism recorded was that the surcharge framework may not give Commonwealth entities enough incentive to comply, weakening its practical effect. That concern came from Angus Taylor, who said the opposition would not oppose the bill in the House but left its Senate position conditional on further talks.

Criticism was limited and focused on implementation incentives rather than rejecting the bill's overall purpose.

Weak compliance incentives

Angus Taylor argued the surcharge policy did not create enough incentive for Commonwealth entities to comply, raising a practical implementation concern about whether the framework would work as intended.

Raised by Angus Taylor for the Coalition opposition in the House Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

26 Nov 2024

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

28 Nov 2024

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Andrew Leigh

Australian Labor Party • MP 25 Nov 2024

Leigh supports the bill, saying it will formalise longstanding Commonwealth practice by giving clear, modern and consistent authority for entities to charge and collect payment surcharges.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Jenny McAllister

Australian Labor Party • Senator 27 Nov 2024

Jenny McAllister says the bill is a consequential measure that supports the main payment surcharges bill by updating and aligning the Commonwealth's authority to collect surcharges.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Mixed

Angus Taylor

Liberal Party • MP 26 Nov 2024

Taylor says the opposition will not oppose the bill in the House, but warns that the surcharge policy does not create enough incentive for Commonwealth entities to comply and says the Senate position will depend on further talks with the government.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

2 speakers · 3 contributions · 2 support

Coalition

1 speaker · 1 mixed

Full record

Full chat