Transition may be rushed
Critics argued the move to the new aged-care system needed a clearer transition period, warning that providers and older Australians could be left unprepared if the reforms were implemented too quickly.
This bill became law on Dec 10th, 2024.
Health, care & disability
Older people already using aged care, including home care, residential care, Commonwealth Home Support ProgrammeA government-funded program that gives older people entry-level help at home and is being carried into the new system. services and the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care ProgramA specialist aged care program for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people that is being moved into the new framework., keep matching care when the new law starts.
Replacing the old aged care laws with the new Aged Care Act created a transition problem that could have disrupted care, provider approvals and regulation. This bill lets existing care, providers and oversight move into the new system smoothly and updates other laws to match.
Australia’s aged care system was being rebuilt around a new rights-based Aged Care Act that would replace the 1997-era laws and bring programs such as Commonwealth Home Support ProgrammeA government-funded program that gives older people entry-level help at home and is being carried into the new system. and the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care ProgramA specialist aged care program for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people that is being moved into the new framework. into a single regulatory model. That created an immediate transition risk for older people, providers, workers and regulators, so this bill was introduced to preserve existing care and approvals, shift providers into the new regime without interruption, and then lock that continuity in once Parliament passed it and Royal AssentThe final formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament. was given.
The main criticism was that the aged-care transition could be rushed or too loosely managed, leaving providers and older people without enough certainty or practical readiness when the new system starts. These concerns were limited and mostly came from Coalition speakers and an Opposition Senate amendment seeking stronger mandatory transition rulesTemporary rules the minister can make after the new law starts to fix problems during the changeover., while no party represented in the debate opposed the bill overall.
Anika Wells MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 10 Dec 2024
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
1 recorded amendment or procedural vote was found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
19 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Older people already using aged care, including home care, residential care, Commonwealth Home Support ProgrammeA government-funded program that gives older people entry-level help at home and is being carried into the new system. services and the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care ProgramA specialist aged care program for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people that is being moved into the new framework., keep matching care when the new law starts.
Current active aged care providers are automatically moved into the new registered-provider model so services can continue without a break, including for providers funded through older grant programs.
Worker screeningThe check used to decide whether a person is suitable to work with people receiving funded aged care. for aged care can use pardoned, quashed and spent convictions when approved screening bodies assess whether someone is safe to work with people receiving funded aged care.
People will get stronger access to aged care documents under freedom of information law because special secrecy-based exemptions tied to the old aged care laws are removed.
The minister can make extra transition rulesTemporary rules the minister can make after the new law starts to fix problems during the changeover. for 12 months after the new law starts to deal with unforeseen problems, but those rules cannot create offences or directly rewrite the Act.
The Transitional Bill engages the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health by ensuring individuals who entered the aged care system under the Aged Care Act 1997 (the old Act) can continue to receive the same level of care under the Aged Care Bill. Part 2 of Schedule 2 to the Transitional Bill deals with transitioning individuals, where individuals who were approved under the old Act to receive residential care, home care, or flexible care, or were approved for the Commonwealth Home Support Programme (CHSP) or the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care (NATSIFAC) Program, will be transitioned to the new system under decisions that the System Governor is taken to have made under the Aged Care Bill in relation to eligibility determinations, decisions that the individuals require access to funded aged care services and classification types that correspond to the type of care they were receiving under the old Act. This ensures individuals will continue to be able to access health facilities and goods, including nursing and personal care services, medication management services, therapeutic and allied health services and leisure and interest activities. The objectives of the Transitional Bill are therefore consistent with the right to health as they ensure continuity of care for those currently accessing aged care services under the old Act.Aged Care (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum
Under the new Act, only registered providers can deliver funded aged care services. Therefore, all current active approved providers must become registered providers under the new Act to ensure continuity of services for older people. This Part will facilitate the automatic transition of current Commonwealth-funded providers, including approved providers and those funded through CHSP and NATSIFAC, to registered providers under the new model, without the need for any administrative process prior to the new Act commencing, through a process called deeming. Through the deeming process, the department will move providers to the new registration categories based on the current services they deliver or in line with the services their funding agreement requires at the time of deeming. Deeming allows for a planned, orderly transition between regulatory frameworks that will maintain the continuity of service, ensuring all older people receiving care experience no interruption in the aged care services on which they rely.Aged Care (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum
New clauses 85ZZGP, 85ZZGQ and 85ZZGR provide prescribed persons and bodies with exemptions to Divisions 2 and 3 of Part VIIC of the Crimes Act, which would otherwise prevent the disclosure and consideration of pardons for persons wrongly convicted, quashed convictions and spent convictions.Aged Care (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum
In response to Royal Commission recommendation 88, clause 2 omits references to the old Act and the Commission Act in Schedule 3 to the FOI Act. This ensures that the exemption in section 38 of the FOI Act, which prevents the public disclosure of documents covered by secrecy provisions, will no longer apply to the old Act and the Commission Act. Existing provisions within the FOI Act will continue to provide protection to personal information and business affairs.Aged Care (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum
Subclause 65(3) limits the timeframe under which rules made for the purposes of subclause 65(2) may be made to 12 months starting from the transition time, however, it does not limit subitem 65(2) in any other manner.Aged Care (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum
Context
Australia’s aged care system was being rebuilt around a new rights-based Aged Care Act that would replace the 1997-era laws and bring programs such as Commonwealth Home Support ProgrammeA government-funded program that gives older people entry-level help at home and is being carried into the new system. and the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care ProgramA specialist aged care program for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people that is being moved into the new framework. into a single regulatory model. That created an immediate transition risk for older people, providers, workers and regulators, so this bill was introduced to preserve existing care and approvals, shift providers into the new regime without interruption, and then lock that continuity in once Parliament passed it and Royal AssentThe final formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament. was given.
Government introduces transition bill for the new aged care law
The minister said the bill was needed to support the new Aged Care Bill 2024The new main aged care law that the transition bill is designed to support. as it replaced the Aged Care Act 1997The old main law for aged care that this bill helps replace and carry over from., the Aged Care Quality and Safety CommissionThe regulator that oversees aged care quality and safety, and whose role is being reshaped under the new law. Act 2018 and the old transitional law.
Hansard ↗Bill also removes aged-care-specific FOIThe law that lets people ask for government documents, which this bill changes to give better access to some aged care records. secrecy exemptions
The second reading speech said the package would amend the Freedom of Information Act 1982The law that lets people ask for government documents, which this bill changes to give better access to some aged care records. so older people could get stronger access to aged care documents under the new framework.
Hansard ↗Government says a transition taskforce is preparing the sector for 1 July
During debate, the government said providers, workers, older people and families were concerned about the changeover and that a transition taskforce had been set up to prepare the sector for 1 July.
Hansard ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, clearing the way for existing care arrangements, provider approvals and related Commonwealth law references to move into the new system.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal AssentThe final formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament. completes the legal bridge to the new system
Royal AssentThe final formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament. turned the bill into an Act, giving legal force to the transition arrangements designed to keep aged care services running without a break when the new regime starts.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe final formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
The main criticism was that the aged-care transition could be rushed or too loosely managed, leaving providers and older people without enough certainty or practical readiness when the new system starts. These concerns were limited and mostly came from Coalition speakers and an Opposition Senate amendment seeking stronger mandatory transition rulesTemporary rules the minister can make after the new law starts to fix problems during the changeover., while no party represented in the debate opposed the bill overall.
Criticism focused on rollout and safeguards, not on rejecting the bill's overall purpose.
Transition may be rushed
Critics argued the move to the new aged-care system needed a clearer transition period, warning that providers and older Australians could be left unprepared if the reforms were implemented too quickly.
Too much discretion in transition rules
An Opposition amendment sought to make a transitional protection mandatory rather than discretionary, reflecting concern that key transition arrangements were left too much to ministerial choice instead of being guaranteed in the legislation.
Implementation and service delivery failures
Some criticism focused less on the bill's policy goal and more on whether the system would actually deliver care on time, arguing providers should face consequences if they hold packages without providing services within a reasonable period.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Recorded amendment and procedural votes grouped by chamber. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.
Senate
Defeated 28 to 31. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, Australia's Voice, and UAP. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and One Nation. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The amendment was defeated 28 to 31, so the bill kept the original permissive wording on transitional rules.
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Wells strongly supports the bill, saying it is an essential part of the broader aged-care reform and needed to make the transition to the new system work smoothly.
Read in Hansard ↗Pasin says the coalition will support the bill because it is part of the move to a new rights based aged care framework, but he criticises the government for not providing a clear transition period for providers and older Australians.
Read in Hansard ↗Broadbent supports the bill going forward and says he does not have a problem with where it is headed, but he argues the real failure is implementation and that aged-care providers should lose packages if they are not delivering services within a reasonable time.
Read in Hansard ↗Jenny McAllister supports the bill, saying it is essential to implement the new aged care framework and ensure older people, providers, workers and governance arrangements move smoothly to the new system.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
3 speakers · 4 contributions · 3 support
“It is an essential component in enabling us to move forward with once-in-a-generation reform of our aged care system and services.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Thus I'm here today to speak in support of the Aged Care (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2024, and I commend the minister for the important work that she is doing. This bill will support the operation of the Aged Care Bill 2024, which will commence from 1 July next year and deliver a rights based aged-care system. This legislation is a once-in-a-generation reform that will shape the way we support people to live independently and with dignity as they age. As the Minister for Aged Care said when she was introducing this bill, the government recognise that everyone will need support to understand what the new changes in this bill will mean for them, what they will need to do and when they will need to do it. That means that the government will support older people, providers and workers to prepare for the changes arising from the new act by providing clarity on what is new, what is changing and what is staying the same. The government is preparing an aged care transition taskforce to help providers manage implementation challenges, including ICT, education and compliance. Eligible providers will also be able to apply for up to $10,000 to assist with the cost of any IT changes needed to prepare for 1 July next year.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Anika Wells on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Wells strongly supports the bill, saying it is an essential part of the broader aged-care reform and needed to make the transition to the new system work smoothly. She urges the House to pass it so older Australians and providers can move to the new actThe new main aged care law that the transition bill is designed to support. with clarity and support.
“Let's get this legislation passed for them and build a new and enduring foundation for aged care that puts the rights of older people first. I thank the House.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Wells supports the bill, saying it creates a clear pathway for the sector to move smoothly from the 1997 Act to the new aged care law and help providers, workers, older people and families prepare for 1 July.
“This bill establishes a clear pathway to enable the sector to transition smoothly from the Aged Care Act 1997 to the new Aged Care Act 2024. We recognise that the transition process is of particular concern for aged-care providers, workers, older people and their families. That is why we've established the transition taskforce to work with the sector in preparation for 1 July so that we can all make the necessary changes to deliver better aged care. I thank the members for their contributions to the debate on this bill.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 support
“The coalition will support this bill in line with our commitment to the new rights based framework for our aged-care sector, but we condemn the Albanese government for putting at risk older Australians and the aged-care sector by neglecting to provide a clear transition period.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 support
“Personally, I don't have a problem with where the Aged Care (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill is headed, and the coalition have already announced that they will be letting this bill go through on the voices. Having said that, I have a major problem with the implementation of the bill and the processes we've come to, to this point.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Consideration in detail debate
Consideration in detail
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe final formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament., turning the bill into an Act.