Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities

Current status

This bill did not become law and is no longer proceeding.

Policy area

Education & skills

What does this bill do?

Australia would set up a national inquiry into antisemitism at universities so an independent investigation could examine what is happening on campuses.

Why was it introduced?

The 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks exposed unprecedented levels of antisemitism on Australian campuses and left universities failing to protect Jewish students and staff. The bill sets up an independent inquiry with Royal CommissionA very powerful public inquiry model; on this page it means the proposed commission would have strong powers to require evidence and protect witnesses.-like powers to compel evidence, hear confidential testimony and examine antisemitism at universities.

Broader context

Antisemitism on Australian campuses was already documented before the bill, with an August 2023 survey finding many Jewish students had experienced it and some had stayed away from campus, then the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks were cited as driving a sharper surge and exposing what supporters described as universities' failure to keep Jewish students and staff safe. In response, the bill was introduced in June 2024 to create a university-specific inquiry with Royal CommissionA very powerful public inquiry model; on this page it means the proposed commission would have strong powers to require evidence and protect witnesses.-like powers, while the government instead pointed to a broader racism study announced in the May 2024 budget, and the bill later lapsed from the Notice PaperThe parliamentary list of bills waiting for action; if a bill is removed from it, it stops moving forward. in November 2024.

Key criticism

The main criticism was that the bill was too narrowly framed around antisemitism at universities and could sideline Islamophobia and other racism problems on campus while using a heavy inquiry process for a broader social-cohesion issue. That case was raised mainly by Greens senators and one Labor speaker, with Labor still backing referral of the bill while warning against politicising antisemitism through a private senator's billA bill introduced by an individual senator rather than by the government..

Who supported it?

Julian Leeser MPA parliamentarian; the explanatory memorandum says the bill was circulated by the Member for Berowra, Julian Leeser. introduced this bill. Speeches supporting it came from Liberal Party, Jacqui Lambie Network, CLP.

Introduced in House 03 June 2024
Failed in House 26 Nov 2024
Did not reach Senate
Did not become law

Did it become law?

No

The bill did not complete passage through Parliament.

Final passage

No final passage

The bill has not completed passage and is no longer proceeding.

Time before failure

176 days

From introduction to the final recorded step before the bill stopped proceeding

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Australia would set up a national inquiry into antisemitism at universities so an independent investigation could examine what is happening on campuses.

  2. The university antisemitism inquiry would have Royal CommissionA very powerful public inquiry model; on this page it means the proposed commission would have strong powers to require evidence and protect witnesses. level powers, including private evidence and strong legal protections for witnesses, so it could compel information and investigate thoroughly.

  3. The inquiry would look only at antisemitism linked to Australian universities, rather than racism issues across the whole community.

  4. The inquiry would examine antisemitic conduct on campus, including harassment, violence, praise for violence against Jews, and support for terrorist groups hostile to Jews.

  5. The inquiry would judge whether universities, regulators, campus groups and student bodies have done enough to protect Jewish students, staff, academics and visitors.

Show source excerpts
  1. The Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities Bill 2024 is a Bill for an Act to establish a Commission of inquiry into antisemitism at Australian universities.
    Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities explanatory memorandum
  2. This Bill would establish a Commission of inquiry with essentially identical powers to the powers of a Royal Commission. This is crucial to ensure that the Commission of inquiry can effectively probe the rise of antisemitism on campus in Australia. This is because the Commission of inquiry will be led by an independent, respected jurist with the power to grant privileges and immunities, hear evidence confidentially without witnesses needing to fear reprisals, and be assisted by skilled silks.
    Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities explanatory memorandum
  3. The Commission of inquiry would exclusively focus on antisemitism on university campuses in Australia. It would not extend to other aspects of Australian life, except to the extent that it bears on antisemitism at universities.
    Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities explanatory memorandum
  4. For the purposes of paragraph 5(1)(a), subsection 6(1) directs the Commission to inquire into the incidence of antisemitic activity on Australian university campuses. That includes but is not limited to a) harassment, intimidation or violence, b) advocacy or glorification of violence or c) support for listed terrorist organisations. That list is not exclusive, so the Commission can consider forms of antisemitic activity which do not fall within those categories, or which span those categories.
    Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities explanatory memorandum
  5. For the purposes of paragraph 5(1)(a), subsection 6(2) directs the Commission to inquire into the responses of Australian universities to the rise of antisemitism on Australian campuses. That should include inquiring into whether the actions taken by the bodies set out in the Bill to protect Jewish students, academics, staff and visitors on campus have been adequate.
    Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities explanatory memorandum

Broader context for this bill

Antisemitism on Australian campuses was already documented before the bill, with an August 2023 survey finding many Jewish students had experienced it and some had stayed away from campus, then the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks were cited as driving a sharper surge and exposing what supporters described as universities' failure to keep Jewish students and staff safe. In response, the bill was introduced in June 2024 to create a university-specific inquiry with Royal CommissionA very powerful public inquiry model; on this page it means the proposed commission would have strong powers to require evidence and protect witnesses.-like powers, while the government instead pointed to a broader racism study announced in the May 2024 budget, and the bill later lapsed from the Notice PaperThe parliamentary list of bills waiting for action; if a bill is removed from it, it stops moving forward. in November 2024.

  1. August 2023

    Jewish university survey documents campus antisemitism before the bill

    The Australian Jewish University Experience Survey found many Jewish students had experienced antisemitism and 19 per cent had stayed away from campus, giving supporters an evidence base for later action.

    Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities explanatory memorandum ↗
  2. 07 Oct 2023

    Hamas attacks trigger a sharper rise in campus antisemitism

    The explanatory memorandum says antisemitism across Australia, especially on university campuses, reached unprecedented levels after the Hamas attacks in Israel.

    Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities explanatory memorandum ↗
  3. May 2024

    Federal budget backs a broader university racism study instead

    A Senate speech recorded that the May 2024 budget committed the Race Discrimination CommissionerThe commissioner within the human rights system who can examine racism and discrimination, mentioned as an alternative to a university-specific inquiry. to a wider study of antisemitism, Islamophobia, racism and First Nations experiences in universities rather than a stand-alone inquiry.

    Hansard ↗
  4. 03 June 2024

    Bill introduced to create a national inquiry into university antisemitism

    The bill was introduced in the House to set up an inquiry focused only on antisemitism at Australian universities, with powers to compel evidence and hear confidential testimony.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  5. 26 Nov 2024

    Bill is removed from the Notice PaperThe parliamentary list of bills waiting for action; if a bill is removed from it, it stops moving forward.

    The parliamentary record shows the bill was removed from the Notice PaperThe parliamentary list of bills waiting for action; if a bill is removed from it, it stops moving forward. under standing order 42, ending its active progress without establishing the proposed inquiry.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 03 June 2024

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 03 June 2024

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Scrutiny of Bills review 26 June 2024

The scrutiny record says Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills considered the bill in Scrutiny Digest 7 of 2024.

Considered

Collected source bundle
Removed from the Notice PaperThe parliamentary list of bills waiting for action; if a bill is removed from it, it stops moving forward. in accordance with (SO 42) 26 Nov 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

The main case against this bill

The main criticism was that the bill was too narrowly framed around antisemitism at universities and could sideline Islamophobia and other racism problems on campus while using a heavy inquiry process for a broader social-cohesion issue. That case was raised mainly by Greens senators and one Labor speaker, with Labor still backing referral of the bill while warning against politicising antisemitism through a private senator's billA bill introduced by an individual senator rather than by the government..

Criticism was real but limited, not a broad parliamentary case against the bill's overall concern.

Too narrow to address campus racism overall

Critics said the bill focused on one form of racism in a way that ignored Islamophobia and other discrimination on campus, so it risked missing the wider causes of conflict and failing the goal of social cohesion.

Raised by Greens and Labor senator Tony Sheldon Source ↗

Risk of politicising protests and campus debate

The sharpest objection was that the bill could be used to attack pro-Palestine student protest activity and impose a narrow approach to defining antisemitism, rather than dealing even-handedly with racism and safety on campus.

Raised by Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi, with Labor also warning against partisan point-scoring Source ↗

Recorded votes

No recorded votes were found before this bill stopped proceeding.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Julian Leeser

Liberal Party • MP 03 June 2024

Leeser supports the bill and says a judicial inquiry is needed because universities have been wilfully blind to antisemitism on campus and have failed to protect Jewish students and staff.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead opposing voice Opposes

Tony Sheldon

Australian Labor Party • Senator 27 June 2024

Sheldon opposes the bill because he says the government, universities and police are already acting, and because this proposal is too narrow and ignores Islamophobia as well as other forms of discrimination.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Jacqui Lambie

Jacqui Lambie Network • Senator 03 July 2024

Lambie wholeheartedly supports the bill and says a commission is needed because universities have failed to deal with antisemitism on campus.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Dave Sharma

Liberal Party • Senator 03 July 2024

Sharma supports the bill and says it would give university vice-chancellors the guidance they need to deal with antisemitism on campus more resolutely.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

4 speakers · 2 oppose · 2 unclear

  1. Deborah O'Neill O'Neill says the government will support referral of the bill, while criticising the opposition for politicising antisemitism through the proposal.
    “I want to indicate that the government will be supporting the referral of this bill— (Time expired)”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 27 June 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Nita Green Green says Labor will not support the bill because it is a political gesture that would be too slow to deal with antisemitism on campus.
    “This bill is all about politics. It's not about solutions on the ground or taking action. It's not about getting things done. It is not about addressing the conflict in our community or setting the standard by which we wish our community members to behave. It is not about ensuring that we can set the standards that we want our community to behave by. And it is not about ensuring that we set the standards for our community that make sure people are safe, that there is clear information for people about the things that they are seeing on universities. We are making sure that there is an inquiry—”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 06 Feb 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Raff Ciccone Ciccone condemns antisemitism and says the government is already pursuing a parliamentary inquiry and coordinated response to the problem at universities.
    “It's also worth reminding the Senate that, as a government, we have established a parliamentary joint committee that is currently conducting an inquiry into antisemitism, and last October the government also referred antisemitism at Australian universities to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights for inquiry.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 06 Feb 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

11 speakers · 13 contributions · 11 support

  1. Sarah Henderson 2 contributions Sarah Henderson supports the bill and says a commission is needed to investigate antisemitism on university campuses and push universities and regulators to do more.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Sarah Henderson on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Liberal Party • Senator • 25 June 2024

    Henderson supports the bill, arguing that a judicial inquiry is needed because universities have been wilfully blind to antisemitism on campus and have failed to protect Jewish students and staff. She says the bill would establish a commission with Royal CommissionA very powerful public inquiry model; on this page it means the proposed commission would have strong powers to require evidence and protect witnesses. powers led by a judge to investigate those systemic failures.

    “That is why we need a judicial inquiry into their systemic failures on this issue.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Liberal Party • Senator • 27 June 2024

    Sarah Henderson supports the bill and says a commission is needed to investigate antisemitism on university campuses and push universities and regulators to do more. She argues the existing government response is inadequate and that stronger action is needed to protect Jewish students and staff.

    “But much more work needs to be done, which is why the passing of this bill is so important. Enough is enough. We must stop the antisemitic hate and incitement on university campuses. I commend this bill to the Senate.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  2. Hollie Hughes Hollie Hughes supports the bill and says a judicial inquiry is needed because she believes antisemitism is being allowed to spread at Australian universities.
    “So I am incredibly pleased to be here to speak in support of Senator Henderson's bill, the Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities Bill 2024 (No. 2). I think it's the right thing to be done.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 06 Feb 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Linda Reynolds Reynolds supports the bill and says it is sadly necessary because antisemitism has been allowed to grow on campuses and universities have failed to lead.
    “I, too, rise to speak on the Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities Bill 2024, and I do so with a very heavy heart. I find it almost inconceivable that in this day and age this bill is necessary. I commend my colleague Senator Henderson for her leadership in this area. I participated in the hearings of this bill, and I was utterly dismayed to hear some of the responses of the chancellors, but particularly the Australian Human Rights Commission, who were completely blind to this most ancient and wicked form of discrimination.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 06 Feb 2025

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Michaelia Cash Michaelia Cash supports the bill and says it is needed to confront rampant antisemitism on university campuses.
    “This bill sets up a necessary, credible and sensible pathway forward to root out the infection of antisemitism in our universities through an independent, respected and credible judicial inquiry. It behoves us to fight the rampant antisemitism on our campuses, and it behoves us to support the bill.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 27 June 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Maria Kovacic Kovacic supports the bill and says the coalition is backing a judicial inquiry into antisemitism on university campuses because the government and the Australian Human Rights CommissionThe national human rights body, referred to here because some speakers say it has not responded strongly enough. have not responded strongly enough.
    “On behalf of coalition senators, Senator Henderson has taken up the fight for a judicial inquiry by way of introducing this bill into the Senate.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 03 July 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Matt O'Sullivan Matt O'Sullivan strongly supports the bill, saying an inquiry is needed because antisemitic harassment on university campuses is making Jewish students feel unsafe.
    “The ongoing persecution of Jewish students on university campuses across Australia cannot be tolerated, and I urge every senator in this place with every fibre of my being to please support this bill. Let's do the right thing. Let's ensure that protests are able to occur but not in the way that they are. We shouldn't be seeing what we're seeing on our campuses. Please support this bill.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 03 July 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  7. Paul Scarr Scarr says he will support the bill and wants a judicial inquiry into antisemitism at Australian universities because he says Jewish students and staff need protection and the Jewish community has asked Parliament to act.
    “I rise to speak in favour of this private senator's bill, the Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities Bill 2024 (No. 2), and I congratulate my dear friend and colleague Julian Leeser MP for his role in relation to advocating for this and also, of course, Senator Sarah Henderson, who has been at the forefront of this debate. I'll make a number of points in relation to my contribution.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 03 July 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  8. Jacinta Nampijinpa Price 2 contributions Price strongly supports the bill and says the government has failed to act on antisemitism, especially on university campuses.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Jacinta Nampijinpa Price on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Country Liberal Party • Senator • 03 July 2024

    Jacinta Nampijinpa Price supports the bill and says universities need an inquiry because antisemitism has risen sharply on campus and Jewish students are not being protected from racism and intimidation. She argues the situation should have been treated as seriously as other forms of prejudice and warns that ignoring it risks repeating dark historical patterns.

    “I stand to support the Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities Bill 2024 (No. 2). I was brought up in a household with a parent who was a history teacher who taught me the importance of understanding not only our nation's history but also world history, because our history teaches us what we should do in order to avoid atrocities from occurring. We, as an entire world, understand what the Jewish people have endured through world history. Yet, here we are, in Australia, in 2024, where there has become a huge rise in antisemitism throughout our democratic nation and, of particular concern, in our education institutions. Universities are supposed to be a place of learning, challenge, academia and safety, where our young people can learn within an environment where everyone is treated equally and where they don't have to be subjected to racism or prejudice.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Country Liberal Party • Senator • 06 Feb 2025

    Price strongly supports the bill and says the government has failed to act on antisemitism, especially on university campuses. She argues a judicial inquiry is needed because it would be independent, powerful and able to hear confidential evidence from Jewish witnesses without fear of retaliation.

    “The Albanese government has not done enough to combat antisemitism in this country, and that is why I wholeheartedly support this bill. We must launch an inquiry into antisemitism at Australian universities because these institutions wield enormous power. They shape the thinking, the attitudes and the behaviour of the next generation, and if we don't have this inquiry then the next generation is on a fast track to learning hatred that will lead to destruction. Again, the Prime Minister has utterly failed Jews in Australia. Opposition leader Peter Dutton wrote to Mr Albanese in May last year asking that he establish this inquiry as a matter of urgency, and one has to wonder how different the situation might be if the Prime Minister had actually agreed to hold the inquiry back then.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
  9. Andrew Bragg Bragg supports the bill and says a judicial inquiry is needed because universities have failed to protect Jewish students, staff and the wider community from antisemitism.
    “This bill would establish a process where a judicial inquiry would be able to get to the bottom of what has happened at the universities. The universities have been in the main, I would say, indolent and weak. I call out the University of Sydney for particular attention here, because their capitulation to these activists sets a very worrying precedent.”

    Liberal Party • Senator • 03 July 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Greens

1 speaker · 1 oppose

  1. Mehreen Faruqi Faruqi says the Greens will oppose the bill because they want a broader racism study led by the Race Discrimination CommissionerThe commissioner within the human rights system who can examine racism and discrimination, mentioned as an alternative to a university-specific inquiry. instead, and they do not trust the Coalition's motives.
    “The Greens will not be supporting the Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities Bill 2024 (No. 2). The budget handed down last month includes a commitment for the government to undertake a study into antisemitism, Islamophobia, racism and the experience of First Nations people in the universities sector. This was a recommendation of the Australian Universities Accord final report. This much broader study to be done by the Race Discrimination Commissioner will develop recommendations for the government to consider that can contribute to reducing racism and creating safer and more respectful and inclusive learning environments for all students and staff. We support this review by the Race Discrimination Commissioner, whose office is best placed to conduct such a review. They have the expertise and resources to conduct this review, and it is exactly the type of work that they should be doing.”

    Australian Greens • Senator • 27 June 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

1 speaker · 2 contributions · 1 support

Full record

Full chat