Catherine King
Ms King supports the bill, saying it removes unnecessary regulation, modernises agricultural administrative processes, and repeals an obsolete act to keep the statute book up to date.
Read in Hansard ↗This bill became law on May 30th, 2024.
Industry, agriculture & resources
Research and development corporation selection committees will now end automatically after the appointing chair's term ends and any current appointment round is finished, instead of needing a separate step to close them.
Outdated agriculture laws left rural R&D appointments tied to newspaper ads, manual committee shutdowns and extra reporting, while the old Rural Adjustment Act still covered functions now handled by other bodies. The bill modernises those processes, lets committees end automatically, expands advertising options, reduces repeat paperwork and repeals the obsolete Act.
Old agriculture law still carried the Rural Adjustment Act long after the Rural Adjustment SchemeThe older scheme created under the Rural Adjustment Act that had finished long before this bill repealed the Act., the Farm Business Improvement ProgramAn old farm support program mentioned in the repealed law, but its funding had already ended years earlier. and the National Rural Advisory CouncilAn old advisory council created under the Rural Adjustment Act; by this bill's time its work had already been taken over by other bodies. had been replaced or allowed to lapse, while rural research and development corporationA body that helps fund and guide research for parts of Australian agriculture and related industries. appointments still depended on newspaper advertising, manual committee shutdowns and reporting even when nothing happened. The bill responded by updating those appointment rules, extending how long suitable candidate lists could be reused and repealing the obsolete Act, and it became law after Parliament passed it in May 2024.
No significant public case against the bill is recorded so far, with the debate presenting it as a narrow administrative cleanup rather than a contested policy change. Government and coalition speakers supported it, and no party represented in the debate argued the streamlined appointment and reporting changes would cause harm.
Catherine King MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 30 May 2024
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
Members called out ‘aye’ or ‘no’ — no individual votes were recorded.
Passage speed
92 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Research and development corporation selection committees will now end automatically after the appointing chair's term ends and any current appointment round is finished, instead of needing a separate step to close them.
Appointments for rural research and development corporationA body that helps fund and guide research for parts of Australian agriculture and related industries. boards can now be advertised on suitable websites or other publications, so the process no longer has to rely on national newspaper ads.
Lists of people already found suitable for rural research and development corporationA body that helps fund and guide research for parts of Australian agriculture and related industries. board roles can be reused for 18 months instead of 12 months, cutting repeat nomination processes.
Rural research and development corporations will not have to produce a yearly selection committeeThe group that runs the appointment process for some rural research and development corporation board roles. report when no appointments or other committee work happened that year.
Australia repeals the old Rural Adjustment Act, removing outdated drought and farm business program laws that were replaced years ago.
New subsection 129(1) differs from current section 129 in that the Presiding member is no longer required to abolish the Selection Committee. Instead, the Selection Committee would be abolished automatically at the later of the two provided times under subsection 129(1).Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) explanatory memorandum
This amendment would enable a Selection Committee to meet the requirement under paragraph 130(2)(a) by inviting nominations through placing advertisements in a publication or on websites such as employment and recruitment websites, as appropriate. The amendment of paragraph 130(2)(a) would modernise the requirement to invite nominations by no longer requiring a Selection Committee to place advertisements in a newspaper.Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) explanatory memorandum
This amendment would mean that a Selection Committee must not invite nominations from persons under paragraphs 130(2)(a) to (c) of the PIRD Act in relation to an appointment, if the Selection Committee is satisfied that a person included on a list made within the previous 18 months under paragraph 130(2)(d) is suitable for nomination, and the person has not been included on a list of persons given to the Minister under paragraph 132(2)(b) in relation to the appointment. This amendment would have the effect that the timeframe a list made under paragraph 130(2)(d) remains effective is extended from 12 months to 18 months. The intention of this amendment is to improve the administrative process for a Selection Committee in selecting persons for nominations.Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) explanatory memorandum
While there may be a Selection Committee established for an R&D Corporation during a financial year, in some years, there will be no operations conducted by the Selection Committee and therefore nothing to report on. This could be because there were no vacancies required to be filled during that year. This amendment would allow for a more efficient administrative process by removing the requirement to provide a report for a financial year where there have been no operations to report on.Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) explanatory memorandum
The Rural Adjustment Act contains obsolete provisions relating to the Rural Adjustment Scheme and the Farm Business Improvement Program. The Rural Adjustment Scheme ceased in 1997 and all financial commitments were acquitted by 30 June 2000. Funding for the Farm Business Improvement Program ceased on 29 February 2008. The programs were superseded by new reforms for drought support as part of the Intergovernmental Agreement on National Drought Program Reform (agreed on 3 May 2013).Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) explanatory memorandum
Context
Old agriculture law still carried the Rural Adjustment Act long after the Rural Adjustment SchemeThe older scheme created under the Rural Adjustment Act that had finished long before this bill repealed the Act., the Farm Business Improvement ProgramAn old farm support program mentioned in the repealed law, but its funding had already ended years earlier. and the National Rural Advisory CouncilAn old advisory council created under the Rural Adjustment Act; by this bill's time its work had already been taken over by other bodies. had been replaced or allowed to lapse, while rural research and development corporationA body that helps fund and guide research for parts of Australian agriculture and related industries. appointments still depended on newspaper advertising, manual committee shutdowns and reporting even when nothing happened. The bill responded by updating those appointment rules, extending how long suitable candidate lists could be reused and repealing the obsolete Act, and it became law after Parliament passed it in May 2024.
Rural Adjustment SchemeThe older scheme created under the Rural Adjustment Act that had finished long before this bill repealed the Act. winds down under the old Act
The explanatory memorandum says the Rural Adjustment SchemeThe older scheme created under the Rural Adjustment Act that had finished long before this bill repealed the Act. ceased in 1997 and all financial commitments were acquitted by 30 June 2000, leaving part of the Rural Adjustment Act without an active program behind it.
Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) explanatory memorandum ↗Farm Business Improvement ProgramAn old farm support program mentioned in the repealed law, but its funding had already ended years earlier. funding ends
The explanatory memorandum says funding for the Farm Business Improvement ProgramAn old farm support program mentioned in the repealed law, but its funding had already ended years earlier. ceased on 29 February 2008, adding to the outdated material still left in the Rural Adjustment Act.
Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) explanatory memorandum ↗National drought reform replaces older farm support settings
The explanatory memorandum says the old programs were superseded by new drought support reforms agreed through the Intergovernmental Agreement on National Drought Program ReformThe 2013 agreement that replaced earlier drought support settings and made parts of the old Rural Adjustment Act obsolete. on 3 May 2013.
Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) explanatory memorandum ↗National Rural Advisory CouncilAn old advisory council created under the Rural Adjustment Act; by this bill's time its work had already been taken over by other bodies. positions lapse
The explanatory memorandum says NRACAn old advisory council created under the Rural Adjustment Act; by this bill's time its work had already been taken over by other bodies. member positions were allowed to lapse or were revoked on 30 June 2015, with government engagement then handled directly with stakeholders instead.
Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) explanatory memorandum ↗Government introduces a bill to modernise agriculture administration
In the second reading speech, the government said the bill would remove unnecessary regulation by replacing newspaper-only advertising, automating selection committeeThe group that runs the appointment process for some rural research and development corporation board roles. abolition and repealing redundant legislation.
Hansard ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, clearing the way for the outdated Rural Adjustment Act to be repealed and the appointment changes for statutory rural R&D corporationsA body that helps fund and guide research for parts of Australian agriculture and related industries. to take effect.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal AssentThe formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament. turns the changes into law
Royal AssentThe formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament. on 30 May 2024 made the measure an Act, and the explanatory memorandum states the whole Act would commence on the following day.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Reported from Federation Chamber
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
No significant public case against the bill is recorded so far, with the debate presenting it as a narrow administrative cleanup rather than a contested policy change. Government and coalition speakers supported it, and no party represented in the debate argued the streamlined appointment and reporting changes would cause harm.
Criticism appears minimal because the bill mainly updates processes and repeals obsolete law.
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Ms King supports the bill, saying it removes unnecessary regulation, modernises agricultural administrative processes, and repeals an obsolete act to keep the statute book up to date.
Read in Hansard ↗McKenzie says the coalition will support the bill because it modernises outdated agriculture laws, streamlines administrative processes, and repeals an unnecessary act.
Read in Hansard ↗Littleproud says the coalition will support the bill because its changes to agriculture administration are sensible, practical, and will improve how the research and development system is run.
Read in Hansard ↗Gallagher supports the bill, saying it will remove unnecessary regulation, modernise agriculture administration and repeal obsolete legislation.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
2 speakers · 3 contributions · 2 support
“The Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) Bill 2024 will achieve this by removing unnecessary regulation, modernising administrative processes required under agriculture legislation, and repealing a redundant Act.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Catherine King on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Minister's second reading speech
Ms King supports the bill, saying it removes unnecessary regulation, modernises agricultural administrative processes, and repeals an obsolete act to keep the statute book up to date.
“Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) Bill 2024 will achieve this by removing unnecessary regulation, modernising administrative processes required under agriculture legislation and repealing a redundant act.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Ms Catherine King supports the bill, saying it will modernise and streamline agricultural administrative processes, keep the framework fit for purpose, and remove obsolete legislation from the statute book.
“I again thank the chamber for bringing the Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) Bill 2024 on. This bill will ensure administrative processes and regulation under agriculture legislation remain fit for purpose. It amends the Primary Industries Research and Development Act 1989 to modernise and streamline administrative processes, such as allowing for a more efficient process for selection committees to nominate directors for appointment to research and development corporations.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 2 support
“On behalf of the federal coalition, I can advise the Senate that we will be supporting the Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) Bill 2024. Overall, it has our support because we believe that the amendments outlined in this legislation are sensible, responsible and practical.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“On behalf of the federal coalition I can advise the House we will be supporting the Agriculture Legislation Amendment (Modernising Administrative Processes) Bill 2024. Overall, it has our support because we believe the amendments outlined in this legislation are sensible, responsible and practical.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Reported from Federation Chamber
Reported from Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament., turning the bill into an Act.