Fair Work Amendment

Current status

This bill became law on May 31st, 2024.

Policy area

Work & employment

What does this bill do?

People who breach a Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. order about an employee's right to ignore unreasonable work contact outside work hours will not commit a criminal offenceA breach serious enough to risk prosecution and, in this case, possible jail time rather than just a civil penalty. under the Fair Work ActThe main federal law that sets workplace rights and rules, including the penalty system discussed on this page..

Why was it introduced?

The new right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. rules left breaches of Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. orders exposed to criminal penalties, unlike similar stop bullying and stop sexual harassment orders. This bill removes that criminal offenceA breach serious enough to risk prosecution and, in this case, possible jail time rather than just a civil penalty. so breaches are handled through existing civil penalties instead.

Broader context

A separate round of Closing Loopholes changes created a new right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. and let the Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. make orders about unreasonable out-of-hours contact, but those orders would have sat under a criminal penalty provision that did not apply to comparable stop bullying and stop sexual harassment orders. This bill was introduced to remove that mismatch and keep enforcement in the civil penaltyA non-criminal punishment, usually a fine, used to enforce workplace laws. system, and after Parliament passed it and Royal AssentThe formal step where a bill becomes law after Parliament passes it and the Governor-General approves it. was given, the change was tied to the commencementThe date a law or part of a law starts to operate. of the separate right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. law.

Key criticism

The main criticism was that this was a rushed fix to earlier industrial relations changes that could add complexity and uncertainty, especially for small businesses. That case appears to have been raised mainly by independent MPA federal parliamentarian; on this page, MP is used in Tony Burke's title and in references to Zali Steggall. Zali Steggall, while the Coalition said it would not oppose the bill despite attacking the government's drafting mistake.

Who supported it?

Hon Tony Burke MPA federal parliamentarian; on this page, MP is used in Tony Burke's title and in references to Zali Steggall. introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in House 15 Feb 2024
Passed House 28 Feb 2024
Passed Senate 16 May 2024
Became law 31 May 2024

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 31 May 2024

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

1 recorded amendment or procedural vote was found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Passage speed

106 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. People who breach a Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. order about an employee's right to ignore unreasonable work contact outside work hours will not commit a criminal offenceA breach serious enough to risk prosecution and, in this case, possible jail time rather than just a civil penalty. under the Fair Work ActThe main federal law that sets workplace rights and rules, including the penalty system discussed on this page..

  2. The change removes the risk of up to 12 months in prison for breaching a Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. order made under the new right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. rules.

  3. The Act starts only when the separate right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. law starts, and it will never start if that earlier law does not start.

Show source excerpts
  1. The amendments in the bill will insert a new paragraph into subsection 675(2) of the Fair Work Act so that if a person contravenes a commission order about the new right to disconnect, it will not amount to an offence under section 675 of the act and will not expose that person to a criminal penalty.
    Minister's second reading speech
  2. This item would insert new paragraph 675(2)(fa) into existing subsection 675(2) to provide that subsection 675(1) does not apply to an order made under Division 6 of Part 2-9 of the Fair Work Act, which deals with the employee right to disconnect. This amendment would provide that contravening an order made by the FWC under the new ‘right to disconnect’ jurisdiction does not expose a person to a criminal penalty (12 months imprisonment).
    Fair Work Amendment explanatory memorandum
  3. The table in this clause sets out when the provisions of the Bill commence. The Bill will commence at the same time as amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Fair Work Act) made by Part 8 of Schedule 1 to the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes No. 2) Bill 2023, or not at all if that Part does not commence.
    Fair Work Amendment explanatory memorandum

Broader context for this bill

A separate round of Closing Loopholes changes created a new right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. and let the Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. make orders about unreasonable out-of-hours contact, but those orders would have sat under a criminal penalty provision that did not apply to comparable stop bullying and stop sexual harassment orders. This bill was introduced to remove that mismatch and keep enforcement in the civil penaltyA non-criminal punishment, usually a fine, used to enforce workplace laws. system, and after Parliament passed it and Royal AssentThe formal step where a bill becomes law after Parliament passes it and the Governor-General approves it. was given, the change was tied to the commencementThe date a law or part of a law starts to operate. of the separate right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. law.

  1. 15 Feb 2024

    Government moves to fix criminal penalties in the new right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. rules

    When introducing the bill, the government said the separate right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. changes would otherwise expose breaches of Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. orders to criminal penalties unlike comparable stop bullying and stop sexual harassment orders.

    Hansard ↗
  2. 15 Feb 2024

    Bill is introduced in the House of RepresentativesThe lower house of the federal Parliament, where the bill was first considered and passed.

    The explanatory memorandumThe official note that explains what a bill does and why it is being introduced. said the bill would remove criminal liability for contravening Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. orders so breaches would instead be dealt with through the existing civil framework.

    Australian Parliament House ↗
  3. 28 Feb 2024

    House passes the bill

    The House completed its consideration within two weeks of introduction, showing the amendment was treated as a targeted correction to the earlier workplace law changes.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  4. 16 May 2024

    Parliament passes the bill

    Both houses agreed to the bill in the same form, clearing the way for the criminal penalty carve-out to be locked into the Fair Work ActThe main federal law that sets workplace rights and rules, including the penalty system discussed on this page..

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  5. 31 May 2024

    Royal AssentThe formal step where a bill becomes law after Parliament passes it and the Governor-General approves it. makes the amendment law

    Royal AssentThe formal step where a bill becomes law after Parliament passes it and the Governor-General approves it. turned the bill into an Act, with commencementThe date a law or part of a law starts to operate. tied to the start of the separate right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. provisions so the criminal offenceA breach serious enough to risk prosecution and, in this case, possible jail time rather than just a civil penalty. would never apply when that regime begins.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 15 Feb 2024

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 15 Feb 2024

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 27 Feb 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Sent to Federation Chamber for debate 27 Feb 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Referred to Federation Chamber

Federation Chamber debate 27 Feb 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Second reading debate

House second reading agreed 27 Feb 2024

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Consideration in detail 27 Feb 2024

The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.

Consideration in detail debate

Returned from Federation Chamber 28 Feb 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Reported from Federation Chamber

House third reading agreed 28 Feb 2024

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 28 Feb 2024

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 28 Feb 2024

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (14/03/2024) review 29 Feb 2024

Referred to Committee (29/02/2024): Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (14/03/2024)

Referred to committee

APH bill page notes
Senate second reading agreed 16 May 2024

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Senate third reading agreed 16 May 2024

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

Passed both houses 16 May 2024

Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.

Finally passed both Houses

Assent 31 May 2024

The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal step where a bill becomes law after Parliament passes it and the Governor-General approves it., turning the bill into an Act.

The main case against this bill

The main criticism was that this was a rushed fix to earlier industrial relations changes that could add complexity and uncertainty, especially for small businesses. That case appears to have been raised mainly by independent MPA federal parliamentarian; on this page, MP is used in Tony Burke's title and in references to Zali Steggall. Zali Steggall, while the Coalition said it would not oppose the bill despite attacking the government's drafting mistake.

Criticism was limited and focused mainly on drafting, consultation and business compliance risk.

Rushed fix that adds complexity

The bill was criticised as a hurried clean-up of an earlier drafting error that would add more complexity and uncertainty to workplace law, particularly for small businesses trying to comply.

Raised by Independent Mp Zali Steggall Source ↗

Poor consultation and avoidable drafting error

Critics said the need for the bill showed the government had made an avoidable mistake in the earlier right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. law, and argued the fix was being pushed through without proper consultation.

Raised by Zali Steggall, with the Coalition also criticising the government's mistake Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

28 Feb 2024

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

16 May 2024

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Amendments at a glance

Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.

Senate

Defeated

Opposition right-to-disconnect amendments defeated

Aye 26 No 32

Defeated 26 to 32. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, and UAP. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents.

16 May 2024

The defeated amendments meant the bill continued without the Opposition proposals to repeal or narrow the right-to-disconnect framework.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Liberal Party 20 / 0
Labor 0 / 19
Greens 0 / 11
Nationals 4 / 0
Independent 0 / 2
One Nation 1 / 0
UAP 1 / 0
Carried

Black coal underpayment investigation added

The Senate agreed on voicesA vote by voice rather than a formal counted division, used here when the Senate agreed to an amendment. to Senator Malcolm Roberts's second-reading amendment calling for investigation and recovery action on alleged casual black-coal miner underpayments.

Carried on voices

The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.

These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Tony Burke

Australian Labor Party • MP 15 Feb 2024

Burke says the government supports the bill and wants it passed so the right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. can operate as intended without any risk of criminal penalties.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead opposing voice Opposes

Zali Steggall

Independent • MP 27 Feb 2024

Steggall opposes the bill overall, arguing it is a rushed clean-up of earlier industrial relations changes that adds complexity and uncertainty for small businesses.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

David Coleman

Liberal Party • MP 27 Feb 2024

David Coleman says the opposition will not oppose the bill because it fixes the government's mistake, but he attacks Labor for the extraordinary incompetence that led to the problem in the first place.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Jenny McAllister

Australian Labor Party • Senator 28 Feb 2024

McAllister supports the bill because it fixes the right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. provisions so they operate as intended and, importantly, removes any risk of criminal penalties applying.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

2 speakers · 2 support

Coalition

1 speaker · 1 support

Minor parties and independents

1 speaker · 1 oppose

Full record

Full chat