Rushed fix that adds complexity
The bill was criticised as a hurried clean-up of an earlier drafting error that would add more complexity and uncertainty to workplace law, particularly for small businesses trying to comply.
This bill became law on May 31st, 2024.
Work & employment
People who breach a Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. order about an employee's right to ignore unreasonable work contact outside work hours will not commit a criminal offenceA breach serious enough to risk prosecution and, in this case, possible jail time rather than just a civil penalty. under the Fair Work ActThe main federal law that sets workplace rights and rules, including the penalty system discussed on this page..
The new right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. rules left breaches of Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. orders exposed to criminal penalties, unlike similar stop bullying and stop sexual harassment orders. This bill removes that criminal offenceA breach serious enough to risk prosecution and, in this case, possible jail time rather than just a civil penalty. so breaches are handled through existing civil penalties instead.
A separate round of Closing Loopholes changes created a new right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. and let the Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. make orders about unreasonable out-of-hours contact, but those orders would have sat under a criminal penalty provision that did not apply to comparable stop bullying and stop sexual harassment orders. This bill was introduced to remove that mismatch and keep enforcement in the civil penaltyA non-criminal punishment, usually a fine, used to enforce workplace laws. system, and after Parliament passed it and Royal AssentThe formal step where a bill becomes law after Parliament passes it and the Governor-General approves it. was given, the change was tied to the commencementThe date a law or part of a law starts to operate. of the separate right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. law.
The main criticism was that this was a rushed fix to earlier industrial relations changes that could add complexity and uncertainty, especially for small businesses. That case appears to have been raised mainly by independent MPA federal parliamentarian; on this page, MP is used in Tony Burke's title and in references to Zali Steggall. Zali Steggall, while the Coalition said it would not oppose the bill despite attacking the government's drafting mistake.
Hon Tony Burke MPA federal parliamentarian; on this page, MP is used in Tony Burke's title and in references to Zali Steggall. introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 31 May 2024
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
1 recorded amendment or procedural vote was found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
106 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
People who breach a Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. order about an employee's right to ignore unreasonable work contact outside work hours will not commit a criminal offenceA breach serious enough to risk prosecution and, in this case, possible jail time rather than just a civil penalty. under the Fair Work ActThe main federal law that sets workplace rights and rules, including the penalty system discussed on this page..
The change removes the risk of up to 12 months in prison for breaching a Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. order made under the new right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. rules.
The Act starts only when the separate right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. law starts, and it will never start if that earlier law does not start.
The amendments in the bill will insert a new paragraph into subsection 675(2) of the Fair Work Act so that if a person contravenes a commission order about the new right to disconnect, it will not amount to an offence under section 675 of the act and will not expose that person to a criminal penalty.Minister's second reading speech
This item would insert new paragraph 675(2)(fa) into existing subsection 675(2) to provide that subsection 675(1) does not apply to an order made under Division 6 of Part 2-9 of the Fair Work Act, which deals with the employee right to disconnect. This amendment would provide that contravening an order made by the FWC under the new ‘right to disconnect’ jurisdiction does not expose a person to a criminal penalty (12 months imprisonment).Fair Work Amendment explanatory memorandum
The table in this clause sets out when the provisions of the Bill commence. The Bill will commence at the same time as amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Fair Work Act) made by Part 8 of Schedule 1 to the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes No. 2) Bill 2023, or not at all if that Part does not commence.Fair Work Amendment explanatory memorandum
Context
A separate round of Closing Loopholes changes created a new right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. and let the Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. make orders about unreasonable out-of-hours contact, but those orders would have sat under a criminal penalty provision that did not apply to comparable stop bullying and stop sexual harassment orders. This bill was introduced to remove that mismatch and keep enforcement in the civil penaltyA non-criminal punishment, usually a fine, used to enforce workplace laws. system, and after Parliament passed it and Royal AssentThe formal step where a bill becomes law after Parliament passes it and the Governor-General approves it. was given, the change was tied to the commencementThe date a law or part of a law starts to operate. of the separate right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. law.
Government moves to fix criminal penalties in the new right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. rules
When introducing the bill, the government said the separate right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. changes would otherwise expose breaches of Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. orders to criminal penalties unlike comparable stop bullying and stop sexual harassment orders.
Hansard ↗Bill is introduced in the House of RepresentativesThe lower house of the federal Parliament, where the bill was first considered and passed.
The explanatory memorandumThe official note that explains what a bill does and why it is being introduced. said the bill would remove criminal liability for contravening Fair Work CommissionThe workplace tribunal that can make orders and hear disputes under the Fair Work Act. right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. orders so breaches would instead be dealt with through the existing civil framework.
Australian Parliament House ↗House passes the bill
The House completed its consideration within two weeks of introduction, showing the amendment was treated as a targeted correction to the earlier workplace law changes.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both houses agreed to the bill in the same form, clearing the way for the criminal penalty carve-out to be locked into the Fair Work ActThe main federal law that sets workplace rights and rules, including the penalty system discussed on this page..
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal AssentThe formal step where a bill becomes law after Parliament passes it and the Governor-General approves it. makes the amendment law
Royal AssentThe formal step where a bill becomes law after Parliament passes it and the Governor-General approves it. turned the bill into an Act, with commencementThe date a law or part of a law starts to operate. tied to the start of the separate right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. provisions so the criminal offenceA breach serious enough to risk prosecution and, in this case, possible jail time rather than just a civil penalty. would never apply when that regime begins.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Second reading debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Reported from Federation Chamber
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Referred to Committee (29/02/2024): Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (14/03/2024)
Referred to committee
APH bill page notesThe chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal step where a bill becomes law after Parliament passes it and the Governor-General approves it., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
The main criticism was that this was a rushed fix to earlier industrial relations changes that could add complexity and uncertainty, especially for small businesses. That case appears to have been raised mainly by independent MPA federal parliamentarian; on this page, MP is used in Tony Burke's title and in references to Zali Steggall. Zali Steggall, while the Coalition said it would not oppose the bill despite attacking the government's drafting mistake.
Criticism was limited and focused mainly on drafting, consultation and business compliance risk.
Rushed fix that adds complexity
The bill was criticised as a hurried clean-up of an earlier drafting error that would add more complexity and uncertainty to workplace law, particularly for small businesses trying to comply.
Poor consultation and avoidable drafting error
Critics said the need for the bill showed the government had made an avoidable mistake in the earlier right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. law, and argued the fix was being pushed through without proper consultation.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.
Senate
Defeated 26 to 32. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, and UAP. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, and minor parties and independents.
The defeated amendments meant the bill continued without the Opposition proposals to repeal or narrow the right-to-disconnect framework.
The Senate agreed on voicesA vote by voice rather than a formal counted division, used here when the Senate agreed to an amendment. to Senator Malcolm Roberts's second-reading amendment calling for investigation and recovery action on alleged casual black-coal miner underpayments.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Burke says the government supports the bill and wants it passed so the right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. can operate as intended without any risk of criminal penalties.
Read in Hansard ↗Steggall opposes the bill overall, arguing it is a rushed clean-up of earlier industrial relations changes that adds complexity and uncertainty for small businesses.
Read in Hansard ↗David Coleman says the opposition will not oppose the bill because it fixes the government's mistake, but he attacks Labor for the extraordinary incompetence that led to the problem in the first place.
Read in Hansard ↗McAllister supports the bill because it fixes the right to disconnectThe rule that lets an employee ignore unreasonable work contact outside working hours unless a tribunal order says otherwise. provisions so they operate as intended and, importantly, removes any risk of criminal penalties applying.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
2 speakers · 2 support
“Despite that, I hope that, now that it is in a separate bill, the coalition—and indeed all members—will now support this legislation which will ensure that criminal penalties do not apply.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Despite that, I hope that, now that it is in a separate bill, the Coalition—and indeed all members—will now support this legislation which will ensure that criminal penalties do not apply.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 support
“It's a terrible indictment on the incompetence of the government. We will not be opposing this amendment because it seeks to cure this extraordinary incompetence, but what an extraordinary reflection this is on the chaotic incompetence of the Albanese government.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 oppose
“Overall, the changes that affect casual workers are not what is needed right now, I would argue, especially for small businesses, in light of current economic circumstances. They will still create complexity, uncertainty and more pressure for many that are already struggling to break even. Small businesses will continue to feel this pressure well into 2024.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Consideration in detail debate
Consideration in detail
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
House · Reported from Federation Chamber
Reported from Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe formal step where a bill becomes law after Parliament passes it and the Governor-General approves it., turning the bill into an Act.
Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (14/03/2024)
Referred to committee
Referred to Committee (29 Feb 2024): Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Committee report (14 Mar 2024)
APH bill page notes