Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence)

Current status

This bill became law on Dec 10th, 2024.

Policy area

Law, justice & rights

What does this bill do?

Children and vulnerable adults receive special court protections across more federal offences, including genocide, torture, war crimes and child drug offences.

Why was it introduced?

The government said sexual assault can cause devastating and long-lasting harm, while court processes can cause further trauma. The bill carries out recommendations 52, 53, 56 and 61 from the 2017 Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, the national inquiry into abuse in institutions. It forms part of a wider $14.7 million government program to improve justice responses to sexual assault.

Broader context

Commonwealth criminal procedure already gave some vulnerable people special protections, but the 2017 Royal Commission and the 2021–2030 national strategy recognised that survivors can face cumulative, long-lasting harm when giving evidence in child sexual abuse cases. After the federal government set the scope of an inquiry into judicial responses to sexual violence in January 2024, Mark Dreyfus MP introduced the bill to widen protections, restrict sexual-history evidence and direct cross-examinationQuestions from the opposing side., and Parliament passed it in November before Royal Assent in December made it law.

Key criticism

Michaelia Cash (Liberal) argued that the introduced bill was badly drafted and could have blocked evidence needed to prove some serious child sexual offences. She said a Senate committee inquiry identified the problem before passage. Larissa Waters (Australian Greens) argued that broader communication support, regular trauma training and properly funded legal help were still needed. She said the women’s safety sector sought $1 billion each year and that one in four women seeking help risked being turned away.

Who supported it?

Mark Dreyfus MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.

Introduced in House 07 Feb 2024
Passed House 15 Feb 2024
Passed Senate 28 Nov 2024
Became law 10 Dec 2024

Did it become law?

Yes

Became law 10 Dec 2024

Final passage

Passed without a counted vote

4 recorded amendment or procedural votes were found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.

Passage speed

307 days

From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step

Official record

View on APH

Parliament of Australia bill page

What does this bill do?

  1. Children and vulnerable adults receive special court protections across more federal offences, including genocide, torture, war crimes and child drug offences.

  2. Adults abused as children can receive the protections for child complainants and witnesses. They can choose not to receive them after turning 18.

  3. Vulnerable adult complainants cannot be questioned about their sexual reputation. Evidence about sexual experiences is allowed only under strict court tests.

  4. Vulnerable witnesses can give recorded evidence when a court decides this is fair. They do not have to see the defendant while recording it.

  5. Vulnerable witnesses usually avoid repeating recorded evidence. A court can require more evidence when clarification, new information or fairness makes it necessary.

  6. Vulnerable adult complainants cannot be personally questioned by defendants without lawyers. A court-appointed person asks the defendant’s questions instead.

  7. Victims and survivors can identify themselves publicly. Someone else may identify them with informed consentAgreement after understanding choices and consequences. and within any limits they set.

Show source excerpts
  1. Crimes Act 1914 1 After paragraph 15Y(1)(b) (ba) an offence against Division 268 of the Criminal Code that is: (ia) genocide (within the meaning of that Code); or (i) a crime against humanity (within the meaning of that Code); or (ii) a war crime (within the meaning of that Code); or (iii) a crime against the administration of the justice of the International Criminal Court (within the meaning of that Code); 2 After paragraph 15Y(1)(cad) (cae) an offence against Division 274 of the Criminal Code (torture); (caf) an offence against Division 309 of the Criminal Code (drug offences invol
    Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) as-passed text
  2. 17A After section 15YAB 15YAC Child complainants (1) A child complainant, in relation to a child proceeding: (a) is a child who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence, of a kind referred to in subsection 15Y(1), to which the proceeding relates (whether or not the child is involved in the proceeding or was involved in the initiation of the proceeding); and (b) includes a person who was such a child at the time the offence concerned was alleged to have been committed. (2) However, a person who is 18 or over is not a child complainant if the person informs the court that the person
    Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) as-passed text
  3. 26 After section 15YC 15YCA Evidence of sexual reputation—vulnerable adult proceedings Evidence of a vulnerable adult complainant’s reputation with respect to sexual activities is inadmissible in a vulnerable adult proceeding. 15YCB Evidence of sexual experience—vulnerable adult proceedings (1) Evidence of a vulnerable adult complainant’s experience with respect to sexual activities is inadmissible in a vulnerable adult proceeding, unless the court gives leave. (2) The court must not give leave unless the court is satisfied that: (a) the evidence is substantially relevant to facts in iss
    Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) as-passed text
  4. 15YDB Evidence recording hearings (1) The court may, if it is satisfied that it is in the interests of justice to do so, order a hearing (the evidence recording hearing) for the vulnerable person to give evidence. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the court must take into account: (a) whether each party to the proceeding has sufficient time to prepare for the evidence recording hearing and the proceeding; and (b) the availability of: (i) the prosecutor in the proceeding; and (ii) if the defendant has a legal representative—the defendant’s legal representative; and (iii) if the def
    Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) as-passed text
  5. 15YDG Vulnerable person need not give further evidence unless court orders (1) If evidence given by the vulnerable person in an evidence recording hearing is admitted in the proceeding, the vulnerable person need not give any further evidence in the proceeding unless the court orders that this is necessary: (a) to clarify the vulnerable person’s evidence given in the evidence recording hearing; or (b) to give proper consideration of information or material that has become available since the evidence recording hearing; or (c) in the interests of justice. Note: This subsection covers furth
    Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) as-passed text
  6. 27A After section 15YF 15YFA Unrepresented defendants—cross‑examination of vulnerable adult complainants (1) A defendant in a vulnerable adult proceeding who is not represented by counsel is not to cross‑examine a vulnerable adult complainant. Note: A person is not to cross‑examine certain persons at committal proceedings or proceedings of a similar kind—see section 15YHA. (2) A person appointed by the court is to ask the vulnerable adult complainant any questions that the defendant requests the person to ask the complainant.
    Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) as-passed text
  7. 52 Section 15YR (heading) Repeal the heading, substitute: 15YR Publication identifying another person as a child witness, child complainant, vulnerable adult complainant or special witness 53 Paragraph 15YR(1)(c) Repeal the paragraph, substitute: (c) the matter identifies, or is likely to lead to the identification of, another person (the vulnerable person) as: (i) a child witness or child complainant in a child proceeding; or (ii) a vulnerable adult complainant in a vulnerable adult proceeding; or (iii) in the case of a special witness in a special witness proceeding for whom an order
    Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) as-passed text

Broader context for this bill

Commonwealth criminal procedure already gave some vulnerable people special protections, but the 2017 Royal Commission and the 2021–2030 national strategy recognised that survivors can face cumulative, long-lasting harm when giving evidence in child sexual abuse cases. After the federal government set the scope of an inquiry into judicial responses to sexual violence in January 2024, Mark Dreyfus MP introduced the bill to widen protections, restrict sexual-history evidence and direct cross-examinationQuestions from the opposing side., and Parliament passed it in November before Royal Assent in December made it law.

  1. 2017

    Royal Commission recommends stronger protections for survivors

    The Royal Commission's final report provided recommendations that the bill later implemented to improve protections for vulnerable people in criminal proceedings.

    Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) explanatory memorandum ↗
  2. 2021-2030

    National strategy prioritises support for child sexual abuse survivors

    The National Strategy's first action plan called for victims and survivors to be supported in recognition of the cumulative, complex and long-lasting effects of child sexual abuse.

    Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) explanatory memorandum ↗
  3. 23 Jan 2024

    Federal inquiry into judicial responses to sexual violence announced

    The government announced the scope of an inquiry examining how the justice system responds to sexual violence, adding momentum to reform efforts.

    ABC News ↗
  4. 07 Feb 2024

    Mark Dreyfus MP introduces the bill

    Mark Dreyfus MP introduced the bill to strengthen protections for vulnerable complainants and witnesses in Commonwealth criminal proceedings.

    Hansard ↗
  5. 29 Nov 2024

    Parliament passes the bill

    Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage of the expanded protections.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗
  6. 10 Dec 2024

    Royal Assent turns the bill into an Act

    The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, completing the bill's transition into law.

    Parliamentary timeline ↗

How did it move through Parliament?

House Senate
Introduced 07 Feb 2024

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 07 Feb 2024

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Second reading debate 13 Feb 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Sent to Federation Chamber for debate 13 Feb 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Referred to Federation Chamber

Second reading debate 15 Feb 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

House second reading agreed 15 Feb 2024

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Returned from Federation Chamber 15 Feb 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Reported from Federation Chamber

House third reading agreed 15 Feb 2024

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber. Later message exchanges with the other chamber were still recorded afterwards.

Third reading agreed to

Introduced 26 Feb 2024

The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.

Introduced and read a first time

Second reading opened 26 Feb 2024

A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.

Second reading moved

Scrutiny of Bills review 28 Feb 2024

Considered by scrutiny committee (28/02/2024): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 7 of 2024

Scrutiny Digest 7 of 2024

APH bill page notes
Legal and Constitutional Affairs review 29 Feb 2024

Referred to Committee (29/02/2024): Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee; Committee report (24/04/2024)

Report tabled 24 Apr 2024

APH bill page notes
Human Rights review 20 Mar 2024

Considered by scrutiny committee (20/03/2024): Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights; Report 2 of 2024

Report 2 of 2024

APH bill page notes
Second reading debate 27 Nov 2024

The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.

Senate second reading agreed 27 Nov 2024

The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.

Second reading agreed to

Senate agreed to amendment packages 27 Nov 2024

The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.

Committee of the Whole debate

Senate third reading agreed 28 Nov 2024

The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.

Third reading agreed to

House agreed to Senate amendments 29 Nov 2024

The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.

Consideration of Senate message

Passed both houses 29 Nov 2024

Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.

Finally passed both Houses

Assent 10 Dec 2024

The Governor-General gave Royal Assent, turning the bill into an Act.

The main case against this bill

Michaelia Cash (Liberal) argued that the introduced bill was badly drafted and could have blocked evidence needed to prove some serious child sexual offences. She said a Senate committee inquiry identified the problem before passage. Larissa Waters (Australian Greens) argued that broader communication support, regular trauma training and properly funded legal help were still needed. She said the women’s safety sector sought $1 billion each year and that one in four women seeking help risked being turned away.

Cash supported the bill’s overall purpose and said the problems concerned its introduced drafting. The final text changed the disputed evidence rules and prevents unrepresented defendants from personally questioning vulnerable adult complainants.

Drafting risk to prosecutions

The original drafting could have prevented convictions for some serious Commonwealth child sexual offences; government amendments addressed the identified errors before passage.

Raised by Michaelia Cash and the Coalition Source ↗

Protection and funding gaps

The bill did not impose a complete ban on accused people personally cross-examining sexual violence complainants, and its protections could be weakened without adequate funding for legal assistance and frontline services.

Raised by Larissa Waters and the Australian Greens Source ↗

Recorded votes

How the bill itself passed

The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.

Passed

House passed the bill

House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

15 Feb 2024

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Passed

Senate passed the bill

Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.

28 Nov 2024

Passed on the voices

In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.

Amendments at a glance

Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.

Senate

Tied

Record concern about flaws in the introduced bill

Aye 31 No 31

Decided 31 to 31. Support came from Liberal, Nationals, One Nation, Gerard Rennick People First, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor and Greens.

27 Nov 2024

The proposal was defeated after the vote tied 31–31, so the criticism was not added to the Senate’s second-reading motion.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 20
Liberal 19 / 0
Greens 0 / 11
Nationals 6 / 0
Independent 2 / 0
One Nation 2 / 0
Gerard Rennick People First 1 / 0
UAP 1 / 0

Did not vote: Liberal Party

Defeated

Call for accused people not to question victim-survivors personally

Aye 13 No 26

Defeated 13 to 26. Support came from Greens and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal, One Nation, and Nationals.

27 Nov 2024

The Senate rejected the proposal by 26 votes to 13, so the call was not added to the second-reading motion.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 0 / 20
Greens 11 / 0
Liberal 0 / 3
Independent 2 / 0
One Nation 0 / 1
Nationals 0 / 1
UAP 0 / 1

Did not vote: Liberal Party

Carried

Set the circumstances for admitting children’s sexual-experience evidence

Aye 32 No 24

Passed 32 to 24. Support came from Labor, Greens, Australia's Voice, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal, Nationals, and Gerard Rennick People First.

27 Nov 2024

The committee approved the provision by 32 votes to 24, adding the restriction to the bill.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Labor 18 / 0
Liberal 0 / 17
Greens 11 / 0
Nationals 0 / 6
Independent 2 / 0
Australia's Voice 1 / 0
Gerard Rennick People First 0 / 1

Did not vote: Liberal Party

Tied

Require a review after the law’s first year

Aye 27 No 27

Decided 27 to 27. Support came from Liberal, Nationals, Australia's Voice, and Gerard Rennick People First. Opposition came from Labor and Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.

28 Nov 2024

The proposal was defeated after the vote tied 27–27, so the statutory review requirement was not added to the bill.

Party Recorded votes Aye / No
Liberal 17 / 0
Labor 0 / 15
Greens 0 / 11
Nationals 4 / 0
Independent 1 / 1
Australia's Voice 1 / 0
Gerard Rennick People First 1 / 0
Jacqui Lambie Network 1 / 0
One Nation 1 / 0
UAP 1 / 0

Did not vote: Liberal Party

Carried

Adopt most government changes to witness protections

The Senate accepted most government amendments, including changes concerning covered offences, witness definitions, recorded evidence, personal questioning and interpreters. No vote counts are recorded.

Carried on voices

The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.

These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.

The parliamentary record also shows 21 Government amendments agreed without a counted division.

Who spoke, and what they said

Start here — lead voices

Sponsor speech Supports

Mark Dreyfus

Australian Labor Party • MP 07 Feb 2024

Dreyfus supports the bill because it strengthens protections for vulnerable witnesses and complainants, reduces the risk of retraumatisation and gives victims and survivors greater control over their stories while retaining due process for defendants.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead supporting voice Supports

Michaelia Cash

Liberal Party • Senator 27 Nov 2024

Cash says the coalition will support the bill because its procedural protections broadly align with coalition policy, but strongly criticises the government's original drafting for potentially preventing convictions for serious child sexual offences until Senate scrutiny exposed and fixed the errors.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead non-major voice Supports

Zali Steggall

Independent • MP 15 Feb 2024

Zali Steggall supports the bill as a positive first step towards a more victim-centred justice system, while urging further reforms to protect survivors and prevent cases spanning federal and state jurisdictions from falling through the cracks.

Read in Hansard ↗
Lead voice Supports

Carol Brown

Australian Labor Party • Senator 26 Feb 2024

Brown supports the bill as an important step that strengthens protections for vulnerable people in Commonwealth criminal proceedings, reduces the risk of re-traumatisation and gives victims and survivors greater control over their stories.

Read in Hansard ↗

All speeches by bloc

Labor

8 speakers · 7 support · 1 unclear

  1. Graham Perrett Graham Perrett fully supports the bill because its trauma-informed protections will reduce the retraumatisation of sexual violence victims and survivors while preserving due process and fair trials.
    “Labor is committed to strengthening and harmonising sexual assault and consent laws, and to improving outcomes and experiences for victims and survivors in our justice system. Providing trauma informed support and a secure victim- and survivor-centred experience at all stages of the criminal justice process helps ensure vulnerable persons are treated with sensitivity. It will also decrease the risk of retraumatisation and will have a positive impact on victims and survivors in their journeys to healing. This bill has my full support.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 15 Feb 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Sharon Claydon Sharon Claydon strongly supports the bill because it will reduce barriers to justice for victims and survivors of sexual violence, including by allowing vulnerable people’s prerecorded evidence to be used throughout criminal proceedings.
    “CLAYDON (—) (): I thank all the speakers who have come before me to lend their support to this most important bill, the Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) Bill 2024, before the Australian parliament. This amendment to the Crimes Act, which will indeed strengthen the criminal justice response for victims and survivors of sexual assault in Australia, is important work of this parliament. It's been a long time coming, and I, along with many of my colleagues, have sat on numerous inquiries over the years and through important royal commissions and have read papers written by experts and, most importantly, the testimony of the victims and survivors themselves, who have called for these changes to occur in our criminal justice system. The legislation before the House today will go a long way to improving the experience of victims and survivors of sexual violence, particularly for vulnerable people in Commonwealth criminal proceedings.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 15 Feb 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Justine Elliot Elliot strongly supports the bill because it expands protections for vulnerable witnesses and complainants, limits harmful sexual-history evidence, reduces the risk of retraumatisation and gives victims-survivors greater control over telling their stories.
    “I too am going to speak on the Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) Bill 2024. As the Assistant Minister for the Prevention of Family Violence in the Albanese government, I'm very proud to be here today supporting this very comprehensive suite of reforms which stakeholders, experts and victims-survivors have been calling for. Many people right throughout the community—so many people—have been calling for this for a long period of time. I know I and my colleagues are all proud to be delivering this suite of measures to address these issues.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 15 Feb 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  4. Libby Coker Libby Coker supports the bill because it strengthens protections for victims and survivors in Commonwealth criminal proceedings, reduces the risk of further trauma when they give evidence, and gives them greater control over their stories.
    “For all those brave women and all women across the nation I stand today to support this bill. Like our Attorney-General, I recognise and thank all victims-survivors who have advocated for this much-needed reform. These efforts build upon the extensive work undertaken by our government since taking office, leading national discussions on strengthening responses to sexual assault.”

    Australian Labor Party • MP • 15 Feb 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  5. Malarndirri McCarthy McCarthy supports the bill because it strengthens protections for victims and other vulnerable people in Commonwealth criminal proceedings while preserving due process and fair trials for defendants.
    “These reforms better support victims and survivors engaged in the Commonwealth criminal justice system, whilst maintaining due process protections and ensuring that defendants continue to be tried fairly and impartially.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 27 Nov 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  6. Deborah O'Neill O'Neill does not state a position on the bill; the remarks only explain the procedure for continuing debate in the Committee of the Whole.
    “The minister has already summed up and technically you'd only be able to make a contribution by leave at this point. The chamber is going to move to the Committee of the Whole, at which point you would be able to make a contribution. Given the uncertainty in the chamber and to progress the matter, I will put the amendments, and then the opportunity for you to make a contribution on this important debate will still be there in the Committee of the Whole.”

    Australian Labor Party • Senator • 27 Nov 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Coalition

2 speakers · 1 support · 1 mixed

  1. Paul Fletcher Fletcher says the bill broadly aligns with state and territory procedures, but reserves his final position pending detailed legal and stakeholder scrutiny through a parliamentary committee.
    “Initial feedback from stakeholders is that these measures are broadly in line with criminal procedure provisions in the various state and territory jurisdictions. However, the bill is technical in nature, and a close analysis is warranted, informed by the expertise of the legal profession. It is highly desirable that the parliament should, before arriving at a final position, allow the legal profession and other stakeholders to provide input through a parliamentary committee process so as to allow the parliament to be satisfied that the bill is well adapted to the problems it seeks to address. I thank the House.”

    Liberal Party • MP • 13 Feb 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Greens

1 speaker · 2 contributions · 1 support

  1. Larissa Waters 2 contributions Waters says the Greens support the bill's stronger protections for sexual violence survivors, while arguing the reforms should be backed by a complete ban on personal cross-examinationQuestions from the opposing side. by accused people and proper funding for legal assistance and frontline services.

    Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Larissa Waters on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.

    Second reading speech Australian Greens • Senator • 27 Nov 2024

    Waters says the Greens support the bill's stronger protections for sexual violence survivors, while arguing the reforms should be backed by a complete ban on personal cross-examinationQuestions from the opposing side. by accused people and proper funding for legal assistance and frontline services.

    “I rise to speak to the Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) Bill 2024. The Greens welcome the reforms in this bill, which seek to strengthen protections and criminal justice outcomes for victims-survivors of sexual violence, particularly women and children. We support the changes that will enhance protections for vulnerable witnesses, make sexual reputation evidence inadmissible, and place greater restrictions on sexual experience evidence. The way that this sensitive and personal information has been weaponised and used to perpetuate rape culture and victim-blaming is completely unacceptable, and every survivor knows it. I'm relieved this is finally being recognised and fixed.”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

    Second reading speech Australian Greens • Senator • 27 Nov 2024

    Larissa Waters supports the bill but calls for stronger protections by prohibiting accused people from personally cross-examining victim-survivors of sexual violence.

    “(b) calls on the Government to prohibit personal cross-examination of a victim-survivor by the accused".”
    Read this contribution in Hansard ↗

Minor parties and independents

4 speakers · 4 support

  1. Kate Chaney Kate Chaney supports the bill because its four reforms will better protect survivors of child sexual abuse and help vulnerable witnesses give their best evidence.
    “I rise in support of the Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) Bill 2024. For survivors of sexual violence and abuse, participating in the criminal justice system is really challenging. To have suffered a traumatic event and then be expected to detail and relive the trauma again and again must be agonising. Coupled with the shame and stigma that so often accompanies these kinds of crimes, it's a situation that you wouldn't wish on your worst enemy.”

    Independent • MP • 15 Feb 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  2. Zoe Daniel Zoe Daniel supports the bill because it closes gaps in Commonwealth criminal proceedings and reduces the retraumatisation of vulnerable survivors, while urging the government to fund broader sexual violence prevention, counselling and support services.
    “I commend the government, particularly the Attorney-General and his team, for this bill. It fixes some of the existing gaps in Commonwealth criminal proceedings. But, today, I call on the government and, indeed, all of us to do more to address sexual violence. This is something that shouldn't just happen in this place. These are conversations that we need to be having everywhere in our communities. More funding is needed to address current service black spots and waiting times for sexual assault services. As it stands, survivors are being told to wait months for trauma counselling. In the eastern region of Victoria, which includes my electorate of Goldstein, the waiting list for counselling is six to eight months. The Sexual Assault Crisis Line is the central after-hours coordination point in Victoria for responding to sexual assault. It can consistently respond to only 65 per cent of calls because it's so understaffed and underfunded. Waiting list times for men's behaviour change programs are too long. Men using violence are also on months long waiting lists. What happens to the men, women and children in-between?”

    Independent • MP • 15 Feb 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
  3. Monique Ryan Monique Ryan supports the bill because its protections will reduce the trauma experienced by victim-survivors during sexual violence prosecutions, while urging the government to act more promptly on expert recommendations.
    “I rise today to support the introduction of the Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) Bill 2024. There is no doubt that the criminal justice process is distressing and traumatising for victims-survivors. From the very outset, it is a process that is challenging for victims-survivors to trust, especially given the common and unfortunately largely accurate perception that the criminal justice system is ineffective at prosecuting sexual offences. Even if a person feels able to report the offences committed against them, that is just the start of a process that will often serve to compound the trauma of the original assault. The adversarial justice system; the nature of the offences, which are often committed in private, where victims-survivors are the only witness; and the intractable, sexist perceptions of victims-survivors throughout our society—each of these factors makes seeking a conviction uniquely challenging in sexual violence matters.”

    Independent • MP • 15 Feb 2024

    Read the full speech in Hansard ↗

Full record

Full chat