More transparency for levy payers
A key reservation was that the framework should do more to show levy payers exactly how their money is spent, rather than relying on a simpler modernised system alone.
This bill became law on Jul 9th, 2024.
Industry, agriculture & resources
Levy payers, collection agentsPeople or businesses that collect levies and charges and pass them into the system. and levy-funded industry bodies keep operating through the changeover, so the agricultural levy system is meant to continue without interruption.
Australia’s agricultural levy laws had become overly complex, duplicative and inconsistent, with outdated provisions, and a 2018 review found they were not meeting industries’ needs. This bill repeals redundant laws, updates related Acts and sets transition rules so the new levy framework can start without disrupting payers, collectors or levy bodies.
Australia’s farm levy system had supported research, marketing, biosecurityWork to stop pests and diseases spreading through industries; on this page, it is one of the uses levy money may support. and residue testing since the 1980s, but over time the law behind more than 110 levies became fragmented, duplicative and hard to navigate, and a 2018 review found it was no longer meeting industry needs. The 2023 bill package responded by replacing the old framework, repealing 23 redundant Acts and setting transition rules so levy collection and disbursement could continue without disruption. Parliament passed the package in 2024, Royal AssentThe final step that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act of law. made it an Act, and most substantive transition provisions commenced later.
The main criticism was that the levy package still needed tighter transparency and clearer spending rules, so levy payers could better see where money goes and important biosecurityWork to stop pests and diseases spreading through industries; on this page, it is one of the uses levy money may support. or emergency response work was not left unclear or excluded. These concerns were raised in Coalition support for the bill and related Senate amendments, but no party represented in the debate argued against the bill as a whole.
Kristy Mcbain MP introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 09 July 2024
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
1 recorded amendment or procedural vote was found, but no counted vote on the bill itself was recorded.
Passage speed
265 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Levy payers, collection agentsPeople or businesses that collect levies and charges and pass them into the system. and levy-funded industry bodies keep operating through the changeover, so the agricultural levy system is meant to continue without interruption.
Existing levy and charge rates can be carried into the first new regulations without another full consultationThe process of asking industries and agencies for input before changing the levy laws. round, so current charges can continue unchanged during the transition.
Australia repeals 23 outdated primary industry levy laws and updates other laws so the new agricultural levies framework can take over in their place.
Research and development corporationsIndustry bodies that receive levy money and spend it on research and development for their sector. must follow the new Primary Industries Levies and Charges Disbursement Act 2024The new law that controls how levy money is paid out to research and development bodies and other recipients. when they spend levy money they receive.
The government can create new research and development corporationsIndustry bodies that receive levy money and spend it on research and development for their sector., or keep existing ones going, by regulation under the updated law.
set out application, savings and transitional arrangements to ensure continuity of arrangements and minimal impacts for levy and charge payers, collection agents and levy recipient bodies due to the repeal of the Acts and commencement of the modernised agricultural levies legislation.Primary Industries (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum
This would apply to products or goods already subject to levy or charge under the old levy Act or old charge/levy Act, and would allow these levies and charges to continue without requiring additional consultation to occur. The establishment of levies and charges under those Acts was subject to consultation prior to their inclusion in those Acts. There are no changes being made to levy or charge rates in the transition to the modernised agricultural levies legislation.Primary Industries (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum
This bill will repeal 23 existing acts that are, or will become, redundant upon commencement of the bills package. It will also make consequential amendments to a number of other acts.Minister's second reading speech
(1AA) Money paid to an R&D Corporation under the Primary Industries Levies and Charges Disbursement Act 2024 may be spent by the R&D Corporation only in accordance with that Act.Primary Industries (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2024 final Act text
New section 8 would provide that regulations may establish a research and development corporation with the name prescribed by regulation; or continue in existence a research and development corporation prescribed by regulations.Primary Industries (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) explanatory memorandum
Context
Australia’s farm levy system had supported research, marketing, biosecurityWork to stop pests and diseases spreading through industries; on this page, it is one of the uses levy money may support. and residue testing since the 1980s, but over time the law behind more than 110 levies became fragmented, duplicative and hard to navigate, and a 2018 review found it was no longer meeting industry needs. The 2023 bill package responded by replacing the old framework, repealing 23 redundant Acts and setting transition rules so levy collection and disbursement could continue without disruption. Parliament passed the package in 2024, Royal AssentThe final step that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act of law. made it an Act, and most substantive transition provisions commenced later.
Review finds the agricultural levy laws are no longer meeting industry needs
The government later cited a 2018 review that found the levy framework had become overly complex, duplicative and inconsistent.
User payload: whyIntroduced ↗Government introduces the levy modernisation package
The minister said the bill package would streamline the agricultural levies framework, repeal 23 redundant Acts and manage the transition to the new system.
Hansard ↗House passes the bill
After debate, the House agreed to the bill at third reading, sending the transition legislation to the Senate.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, clearing the way for the transition legislation to become an Act.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal AssentThe final step that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act of law. makes the transition Act
Royal AssentThe final step that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act of law. made the consequential and transition law an Act on 9 July 2024, while most substantive schedules were set to commence later, including on 1 January 2025.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Reported from Federation Chamber
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
Referred to Committee (16/11/2023): Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee; Committee report (05/02/2024)
Referred to committee
APH bill page notesThe chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe final step that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act of law., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
The main criticism was that the levy package still needed tighter transparency and clearer spending rules, so levy payers could better see where money goes and important biosecurityWork to stop pests and diseases spreading through industries; on this page, it is one of the uses levy money may support. or emergency response work was not left unclear or excluded. These concerns were raised in Coalition support for the bill and related Senate amendments, but no party represented in the debate argued against the bill as a whole.
Criticism was limited and focused on safeguards and drafting, not on blocking the transition.
More transparency for levy payers
A key reservation was that the framework should do more to show levy payers exactly how their money is spent, rather than relying on a simpler modernised system alone.
Unclear coverage of biosecurity and emergency response spending
Opposition amendments suggested concern that the bill's spending framework did not clearly name key industry bodies or explicitly cover biosecurityWork to stop pests and diseases spreading through industries; on this page, it is one of the uses levy money may support. activities and emergency animal or plant response deeds, which could leave important uses of levy funds less certain.
Further sources
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices. The counted divisions below were about amendments or procedure, not final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Recorded amendment and procedural votes grouped by chamber. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.
Senate
Defeated 28 to 34. Support came from Liberal Party, Nationals, and One Nation. Opposition came from Labor, Greens, Jacqui Lambie Network, and minor parties and independents.
This vote rejected a package of changes aimed at widening the bill’s biosecurityWork to stop pests and diseases spreading through industries; on this page, it is one of the uses levy money may support.-related definitions and expenditure rules, so the bill kept its original drafting.
These are amendment votes, not the final passage vote on the bill itself. The bill passed both chambers on the voices.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
McBain supports the bill as part of the package to modernise the agricultural levies framework, saying it will help deliver a smooth transition to the new system.
Read in Hansard ↗Sam Birrell supports the bill, saying the levy framework needs to be streamlined and made easier to use so more money goes to research and development.
Read in Hansard ↗Chisholm supports the bill as part of a broader package that will modernise the agricultural levies framework and make the transition to the new system smooth.
Read in Hansard ↗Swanson supports the bill, saying it will streamline and modernise the agricultural levy system, cut red tape and make the framework easier for levy payers and RDCsIndustry bodies that receive levy money and spend it on research and development for their sector. to understand and administer.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
4 speakers · 5 contributions · 4 support
“The Bill will facilitate a smooth transition to the new agricultural levies legislation, including for levy collection and disbursement arrangements and payment of matching funding to research and development corporations.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Through these levies and this bill, we are making it simpler and we are standing shoulder to shoulder with them. We are here for the challenges and we want to make sure they get every opportunity.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The separate bill, the consequential amendments and transitional bill, is being introduced to manage the consequential changes and arrangements. This package of bills is the result of extensive consultation over several years to ensure a new framework meets the demands of those who benefit from the system.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Kristy McBain on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Minister's second reading speech
McBain supports the bill as part of the package to modernise the agricultural levies framework, saying it will help deliver a smooth transition to the new system. She says it will also repeal redundant acts and make the consequential amendmentsChanges to other laws that are needed so the new levy framework works properly alongside them. needed to support the new arrangements.
“The bill will facilitate a smooth transition to the new agricultural levies legislation, including for levy collection and disbursement arrangements and payment of matching funding to research and development corporations.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
McBain supports the bill as part of the new primary industries levy framework, saying it will keep continuity for levy and charge payers, collection agentsPeople or businesses that collect levies and charges and pass them into the system. and recipient bodies when the old laws are repealed. She says passage without amendment will preserve a successful industry-government partnership under a more effective legal framework.
“Importantly, the Primary Industries (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2023 will ensure continuity for levy and charge payers, collection agents and bodies that receive levy amounts from the repeal of the existing acts and commencement of the new legislation.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 2 support
“Before the suspension I was able to give my own examples of drip irrigation, fertigation and moth-mating disruption, which was good to talk about here; I enjoyed that. But, in summary, these are necessary legislative changes, so that there is transparency and ease of use and so that we maximise the amount of levy money for this important research and development.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I know the coalition committed $7.2 million in 2020-21 over four years to modernise the framework into a business-friendly, fit-for-purpose and easy-to-use legislative framework as part of the deregulation agenda. I also thank our accountants, who worked so closely with farmers to make sure that they do all the paperwork and to make sure that they get all the necessary bureaucracy correct. The member for Paterson mentioned that it is a user pay system of sorts, and again she is correct. She is absolutely right in that. There are six bills related to modernising the levy system. They include three imposition bills, a collection bill, a disbursement bill and a consequential amendments bill. They are important. They don't bring into existence the biosecurity protection levy announced in the 2023-24 budget. There are no substantial changes as to how the levy system will operate. However, a number of current functions will be devolved to subordinate legislation, such as setting the levy rates.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Referred to Federation Chamber
Referred to Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Reported from Federation Chamber
Reported from Federation Chamber
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe final step that turns a bill passed by Parliament into an Act of law., turning the bill into an Act.
Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee; Committee report (05/02/2024)
Referred to committee
Referred to Committee (16 Nov 2023): Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee; Committee report (5 Feb 2024)
APH bill page notes