Uncertain funding model
Opponents said housing delivery should not depend on market returns from a $10 billion fund, because volatile earnings and capped disbursements could leave too little money reaching actual projects when it was needed.
This bill became law on Sep 28th, 2023.
Welfare & housing
Australia gets a new housing fund seeded with $10 billion to support social and affordable housingHousing meant to cost less than normal market rent or purchase prices so more low and middle income people can access it. and other urgent housing needs.
Urgent housing needs, including crisis, emergency and transitional housingShort-term housing for people who need an immediate safe place to stay, often while they wait for a more stable home., lacked a dedicated federal funding stream and clear public reporting. This bill creates a $10 billion Housing Australia Future FundThe new federal housing fund created by this bill, which is meant to generate money for housing grants and loans over time., lets ministers and Housing AustraliaThe federal housing body that can receive money from the fund and then make grants or loans for housing projects. fund social and affordable housingHousing meant to cost less than normal market rent or purchase prices so more low and middle income people can access it. projects, and requires grant details to be published online.
After more than a decade without a major new national housing investment, MPs and ministers argued that urgent housing needs and a worsening housing crisis were leaving social, affordable, crisis and transitional housing without a clear dedicated federal funding stream. The bill responded by creating a $10 billion Housing Australia Future FundThe new federal housing fund created by this bill, which is meant to generate money for housing grants and loans over time. and new grant pathways through ministers and Housing AustraliaThe federal housing body that can receive money from the fund and then make grants or loans for housing projects.. Parliament passed it in September 2023, Royal AssentThe final formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament. followed on 28 September 2023, and the Act commenced by proclamation on 1 November 2023.
Critics argued the bill was a vague, debt-funded housing vehicle that relied on uncertain investment returns instead of guaranteed direct spending, so it might add inflation and still fail to deliver enough homes. That case was pressed most clearly by the Coalition, while some crossbench supporters backed the bill only if stronger funding guarantees, safeguards and reporting were added.
Hon Julie Collins MP introduced this bill. It passed with support from Labor, Centre Alliance, Katter's Australian Party, some crossbench members; opposed by Liberal Party, Nationals, some crossbench members.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 28 Sept 2023
Final passage
Recorded final vote
1 counted final-passage vote was recorded.
Passage speed
231 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Australia gets a new housing fund seeded with $10 billion to support social and affordable housingHousing meant to cost less than normal market rent or purchase prices so more low and middle income people can access it. and other urgent housing needs.
Federal ministers can give direct grants for urgent housing needs, including crisis, emergency and transitional housingShort-term housing for people who need an immediate safe place to stay, often while they wait for a more stable home. for people at risk of homelessness.
States and territories can get federal grants for urgent housing, social housingHousing kept below market cost for people who need help paying rent, usually with government support behind it. and affordable housingHousing meant to cost less than normal market rent or purchase prices so more low and middle income people can access it. projects.
Housing AustraliaThe federal housing body that can receive money from the fund and then make grants or loans for housing projects. can receive money from the fund so it can make grants and loans for urgent housing, social housingHousing kept below market cost for people who need help paying rent, usually with government support behind it. and affordable housingHousing meant to cost less than normal market rent or purchase prices so more low and middle income people can access it..
Ministers must publish up-to-date grant details online, so the public can track housing funding decisions.
(1) $10 billion is to be credited to the Housing Australia Future Fund Special Account as soon as practicable after the commencement of this section.Housing Australia Future Fund Act 2023 final Act text
‘Acute housing’ refers to crisis housing offered to cohorts at risk of, or who are already experiencing, homelessness. This includes short-term and emergency housing, medium-to-long-term transitional housing and specialist services in relation to housing. This should not be considered an exhaustive description.Housing Australia Future Fund explanatory memorandum
(3) A designated Minister may, on behalf of the Commonwealth, make a grant of financial assistance to a State or Territory in relation to any of the following:Housing Australia Future Fund Act 2023 final Act text
(c) to transfer amounts to the Housing Australia Special Account in accordance with sections 33 and 33A.Housing Australia Future Fund Act 2023 final Act text
Subclause 24(1) would require a designated Minister to publish detailed and up to date information about grants on the website of the Department or Executive Agency that they administer. The information to be published would include, but is not limited to, amounts paid and payable under clause 18 grants, as well as the names of recipients of grants.Housing Australia Future Fund explanatory memorandum
Context
After more than a decade without a major new national housing investment, MPs and ministers argued that urgent housing needs and a worsening housing crisis were leaving social, affordable, crisis and transitional housing without a clear dedicated federal funding stream. The bill responded by creating a $10 billion Housing Australia Future FundThe new federal housing fund created by this bill, which is meant to generate money for housing grants and loans over time. and new grant pathways through ministers and Housing AustraliaThe federal housing body that can receive money from the fund and then make grants or loans for housing projects.. Parliament passed it in September 2023, Royal AssentThe final formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament. followed on 28 September 2023, and the Act commenced by proclamation on 1 November 2023.
Government says a decade of national housing policy has been lost
In introducing the bill, the Housing Minister said the government was turning the page on a "wasted decade" of national housing policy and preparing the biggest housing investment in more than a decade.
Hansard ↗Government introduces a $10 billion housing fund
The bill was introduced to create the Housing Australia Future FundThe new federal housing fund created by this bill, which is meant to generate money for housing grants and loans over time. so investment earnings could support social and affordable housingHousing meant to cost less than normal market rent or purchase prices so more low and middle income people can access it. and other urgent housing needs.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Housing crisis is raised directly in the House debate
During the second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. debate, government MPs described a housing crisis and argued the bill was needed to expand safe and affordable housingHousing meant to cost less than normal market rent or purchase prices so more low and middle income people can access it. after years of inadequate action.
Hansard ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both houses agreed on the final form of the bill, clearing the way for the new fund and grant arrangements to be established in law.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal AssentThe final formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament. completed the bill
Royal AssentThe final formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament. on 28 September 2023 made the bill an Act, but the fund provisions commenced later by proclamation on 1 November 2023.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered., opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. moved
Referred to Committee (09/02/2023): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (22/03/2023)
Referred to committee
APH bill page notesThe bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Recorded vote: 84 to 49.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered., meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. agreed to
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
Consideration in detail debate
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber. Later message exchanges with the other chamber were still recorded afterwards.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered., opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Recorded vote: 34 to 27.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered., meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. agreed to
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Committee of the Whole debate
Recorded vote: 36 to 26.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Consideration of Senate message
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form. The main accepted Senate changes reflected in the final bill were: The introduced and as-passed bill texts differ in 12 observed text blocks. Observed text changed from "If an amount has been credited under paragraph 33(4)(d) to the Housing AustraliaThe federal housing body that can receive money from the fund and then make grants or loans for housing projects. Special Account for a purpose in relat…" to "33A Guaranteed transfers from the Housing Australia Future FundThe new federal housing fund created by this bill, which is meant to generate money for housing grants and loans over time. Special Account to the Housing AustraliaThe federal housing body that can receive money from the fund and then make grants or loans for housing projects. Special Accoun…".
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe final formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
Critics argued the bill was a vague, debt-funded housing vehicle that relied on uncertain investment returns instead of guaranteed direct spending, so it might add inflation and still fail to deliver enough homes. That case was pressed most clearly by the Coalition, while some crossbench supporters backed the bill only if stronger funding guarantees, safeguards and reporting were added.
Criticism was real but split between outright opposition and conditional calls to tighten the scheme.
Uncertain funding model
Opponents said housing delivery should not depend on market returns from a $10 billion fund, because volatile earnings and capped disbursements could leave too little money reaching actual projects when it was needed.
Too vague and weak on safeguards
Several MPs said the bill left too much to later decisions, with an unpublished investment mandate, limited certainty about grant settings, and not enough detail on governance, reporting and accountability.
May miss the real housing problem
Some critics said the fund added debt and bureaucracy without fixing supply bottlenecks, and that Australia needed more direct, ongoing investment in social housingHousing kept below market cost for people who need help paying rent, usually with government support behind it. rather than a financial structure that might slow or limit building.
Further sources
Votes
The chamber-passage votes come first. Expand a vote to see the party breakdown.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Passed 36 to 26. Support came from Labor, Greens, Jacqui Lambie Network, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, UAP, and minor parties and independents.
Earlier bill-stage votes
Passed 35 to 27. Support came from Labor, Greens, Jacqui Lambie Network, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, UAP, and minor parties and independents.
Passed 34 to 27. Support came from Labor, Greens, Jacqui Lambie Network, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, One Nation, UAP, and minor parties and independents.
Passed 84 to 49. Support came from Labor, Centre Alliance, Katter's Australian Party, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party and Nationals. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
Amendments grouped by chamber. These cards include amendment outcomes recorded without a counted division.
House
Passed 91 to 48. Support came from Labor, Greens, Centre Alliance, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party and Nationals. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
This resolved the Senate message and allowed the bill to pass both houses.
Passed 77 to 6. Support came from Labor, Liberal Party, Nationals, and Centre Alliance. Opposition came from Greens. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The amendment was defeated, so the House moved on to the main second-reading vote.
Passed 72 to 13. Support came from Labor, Liberal Party, and Nationals. Opposition came from Centre Alliance, Katter's Australian Party, and minor parties and independents. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The amendment was defeated, leaving the bill without that two-year review requirement.
Passed 51 to 13. Support came from Labor and Liberal Party. Opposition came from Centre Alliance, Katter's Australian Party, and minor parties and independents. Minor-party and independent votes were split.
The amendment was defeated, leaving regional-access detail to later policy settings rather than this amendment.
The House agreed to the amendments made by the Senate, so the bill could pass both chambers in the same form.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
Senate
Defeated 11 to 29. Support came from Greens. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, One Nation, Jacqui Lambie Network, and minor parties and independents.
This was a second-reading statement vote, so it tested whether the Senate would attach a policy call to the bill rather than change the bill text.
Defeated 3 to 36. Support came from One Nation and UAP. Opposition came from Labor, Liberal Party, Greens, Jacqui Lambie Network, and minor parties and independents.
This was a second-reading statement vote, so it was a political call attached to the bill debate rather than a text amendment to the legislation.
Passed 34 to 24. Support came from Labor, Greens, Jacqui Lambie Network, and minor parties and independents. Opposition came from Liberal Party, Nationals, UAP, and minor parties and independents. One Nation had split recorded votes.
The amendments added a spending cap and related machinery before the bill passed the Senate.
The Senate agreed to a government amendment package adding a $500 million annual limit on key Housing Australia Future FundThe new federal housing fund created by this bill, which is meant to generate money for housing grants and loans over time. debits for 2023-24 and related machinery changes.
Carried on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The Senate rejected Senator Thorpe's second-reading proposal on voices, which called for urgent talks on no-grounds eviction limits, stopping public housing and Crown land sales, expanding First Nations tenancy support, and growing public, co-operative and community housing.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
The Senate defeated an amendment on voices calling for tenant protections, public housing, First Nations tenancy support and co-operative housing.
Defeated on voices
The chamber decided this amendment without a counted division, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes.
This list includes amendment votes, procedural votes and votes on the bill itself.
The parliamentary record also shows 20 Government requests agreed without a counted division.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Julie Collins strongly supports the bill, saying it creates the Housing Australia Future FundThe new federal housing fund created by this bill, which is meant to generate money for housing grants and loans over time. as the centrepiece of the government's housing agenda and will provide secure long-term funding for social and affordable homes.
Read in Hansard ↗Sukkar says the opposition will oppose the bill because it relies on $10 billion of borrowings, adds inflationary pressure and higher mortgage costs, and offers no certainty that money will reach housing projects.
Read in Hansard ↗Haines supports the bill as a much-needed start to housing reform, but says it must be improved to explicitly address regional, rural and remote housing needs.
Read in Hansard ↗Dai Le supports the Housing Australia Future FundThe new federal housing fund created by this bill, which is meant to generate money for housing grants and loans over time. bill, saying it is a good start and that the House should take measured steps to help vulnerable Australians.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
33 speakers · 36 contributions · 33 support
“The structure of the Fund will protect it from the whims of future Governments. The Fund will generate returns over the long term, which will allow it to provide annual disbursements to deliver a secure pipeline of funding for social and affordable housing in Australia.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Then there's the Housing Australia Future Fund, to deliver more social and affordable housing. There's a $10 billion investment in the fund to deliver 30,000 new social and affordable houses over five years. This is capital investment to create a revenue stream—again, foreign concepts for those opposite and, indeed, the Greens political party—which means it's sustainable. So every year there will be money flowing in, instead of what we have seen for too long, which is lumpy investments and programs that come and go. We need to make it an ordinary part of the business of government to slowly but steadily increase the supply of affordable housing. That's what the bill does. It's desperately needed. There are hundreds of thousands of people on social and affordable and public housing waiting lists across the country. They are crying out for action, and the government has a mandate for this. It was a key election promise of the government, and this bill is implementing that promise that people voted for.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I say today to all members of the opposition and the Greens: don't get in the way of the people of the South Coast getting the affordable homes they deserve. Do the right thing and support these bills. Our community cannot afford to wait any longer because of your political games. I commend the bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“From this fund we are firmly committed to delivering 30,000 houses over the first five years, including at least 1,200 in Tasmania, my home state. I remind all senators that the Housing Australia Future Fund is supported by the community housing sector. It's supported by the Housing Industry Association, Master Builders Australia, homelessness services, National Shelter, Homelessness Australia, the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Housing Association, the Community Housing Industry Association and the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. They all want to see these bills passed as a matter of priority. They want to see us get on with the job of delivering this housing. So let us get on with it. Let us pass these bills and get shovels in the ground, and hand over the keys of thousands of new houses to the Australians who so desperately need them. I commend the bills to the Senate.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Just this week the Albanese government announced a welcome new support for the Housing Australia Future Fund, meaning the housing legislative package is going to pass the Senate this week.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I will be proudly voting in support of this legislation. I call on those in the coalition opposition, the Greens and the broader crossbench to vote in support of this legislation. Failure to do so would be a massive step backwards for housing security in this country. Stop the politicking. Stop the attempts to delay its implementation. We've waited nine years; we can't waste another day.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So, taken altogether, the measures in this bill represent a substantial yet targeted investment in housing for those who are most in need. It provides targeted support for essential workers, those experiencing domestic violence, veterans and remote Indigenous communities.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Nita Green on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Green says the government strongly supports the Housing Australia Future FundThe new federal housing fund created by this bill, which is meant to generate money for housing grants and loans over time. bill because it is a crucial step to fix the housing affordability crisis and fund new social and affordable homes. She argues the Greens should stop blocking it, because peak housing bodies and local services want the bill passed and delaying it will only hurt vulnerable Australians.
“This is a critical issue facing Australians. It is something that people talk to me about all the time, in regional Australia particularly. For far too long, we have witnessed inaction and delay under the former government when it comes to addressing the housing affordability crisis. We've had a decade of delay and now it is time to get on with fixing this problem. Under the previous government, we saw denial and neglect that exacerbated this crisis, leaving many Australians struggling to find a safe and secure place to call home, but our government has a plan to tackle this issue head-on. The Housing Australia Future Fund is the single most significant investment in social and affordable housing in a decade. The $10 billion fund to invest in 30,000 new social and affordable homes over the next five years is just the beginning. The fund also pledges $200 million for repairs to remote Indigenous housing, $100 million for crisis accommodation for women and children fleeing domestic violence and older women at risk of homelessness, and $30 million for veterans' housing. These are essential commitments that would benefit some of our most vulnerable Australians.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Nita Green backs the bill and says Labor wants it passed because it will fund 30,000 affordable and social homes, along with support for domestic violence services, Indigenous remote housing repairs and housing for veterans. She attacks the Greens for blocking the legislation instead of letting it go to a vote.
“I'm very pleased in the very short time that I have to finish my contribution by again explaining to those watching that what we have seen in this chamber every single day this week is the Greens political party teaming up with the Liberal Party, the National Party and, today, One Nation to block and filibuster this bill to make sure that we don't vote on affordable and social housing. This is a bill that will provide 30,000 homes, affordable and social housing, something that we know people desperately need. This is what we have seen every single day this week—teaming up to stop this bill with the Liberal and National parties. That's what we've seen from the Greens.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“Nevertheless, it's a relief to have this legislation on its way to being passed in the parliament. Unfortunately, we cannot solve all the problems Australia's housing market faces overnight, nor can the Labor government undo in one year what has been 10 years of delay and neglect by the coalition government more focused on themselves than on Australia. But what we can do is take the massive $10 billion investment in the form of the Housing Australia Future Fund that will deliver 20,000 new social rentals the first five years plus 10,000 affordable homes and run with it. That will make a difference; that will have an impact. It is for that reason I'm pleased that senators in this place will work with the government on this reform and not stand in the way of delivering a better life for Australians who are homeless or on the brink of homelessness.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Julie Collins on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Minister's second reading speech
Julie Collins strongly supports the bill, saying it creates the Housing Australia Future FundThe new federal housing fund created by this bill, which is meant to generate money for housing grants and loans over time. as the centrepiece of the government's housing agenda and will provide secure long-term funding for social and affordable homes. She argues it will replace short-term one-off programs with an enduring commitment to more Australians having a safe and affordable place to call home.
“At the centre of our new government's housing agenda, and enshrined in this bill, is the creation of the Housing Australia Future Fund.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Collins supports the bill and says it is a major step toward building more social and affordable housingHousing meant to cost less than normal market rent or purchase prices so more low and middle income people can access it., with returns from the fund helping deliver 30,000 new dwellings in its first five years. She also attacks the opposition for trying to block the package and says the government is acting after years of inaction.
“The Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 establishes the Housing Australia Future Fund. Returns from the fund will help build 30,000 new social and affordable dwellings over its first five years as well as helping to address acute housing needs for some of our most at-need citizens.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Helen Polley on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Polley supports the bill and the linked housing measures, saying they will help Australians who need affordable social housingHousing kept below market cost for people who need help paying rent, usually with government support behind it. and address the housing insecurity that has worsened under previous governments. She backs them as a practical response to rising rents and homelessness, especially for women, children and other vulnerable people.
“These bills will help Australians who need affordable social housing to get it. We should not be demeaning people for needing social housing. We can never stamp out all the issues that have led to their need for social housing, but we can provide housing to help get people into a safer environment.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Helen Polley supports the Housing Australia Future FundThe new federal housing fund created by this bill, which is meant to generate money for housing grants and loans over time. bill and says it will deliver more social and affordable housingHousing meant to cost less than normal market rent or purchase prices so more low and middle income people can access it. for vulnerable Australians, including Tasmanians, women fleeing violence and veterans. She argues the opposition should stop blocking the reform because the housing crisis has been worsened by years of delay and inaction.
“We, as a rich nation, should not accept that. That is why we did the deal that had to be done with the Greens and the crossbench to help more Australians—more children, more women who are fleeing domestic violence and are at risk of homelessness. We know that the cohort of women aged 55 and older is the fastest-growing cohort of homeless people in this country, and we should be ashamed of that. We're a rich nation. We can do more and we must do more. It's time those on that side got out of the way and accepted the fact that this bill will change the lives of ordinary Australians—those who are struggling to make ends meet, those who can't afford to provide a home for their family. Put yourself in the shoes of a mother or father who can't provide that shelter for their children, or who have to farm their children off to relatives. Just think about those people. Stop for one minute and put yourself in those people's shoes. Maybe then you might decide to support these pieces of legislation.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“The housing availability and affordability shambles inherited from the coalition desperately needs fixing. It will not happen overnight, but we recognise it must be done. These bills go a long way towards achieving our aim. The Albanese government reforms are much needed and urgent. They deserve our attention and the support of this parliament. They will help our most vulnerable, such as single mothers like Jenny and her children, who deserve to have a place to call home. There is nothing more important. So this bill deserves support from those opposite and a speedy passage through this parliament. I commend the bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“That's a comprehensive package of measures that the Albanese government is bringing to this parliament, to try and overcome the critical issue of housing shortages in this country and ensure that people have a future ahead of them where they will have a roof over their head. Again, I implore members opposite to support this initiative. It may not be everything they want, but it goes a long way to addressing the housing crisis that we currently face. I commend this legislation to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So I do commend the bill to the House, and I ask the parliament to vote for it. I ask the whole of the parliament to vote for it, because it is doing the right thing—not the perfect thing but the right thing—by Australians.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I hope the Senate will support this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“If we don't make this investment now, if we don't invest in housing, if we don't invest in addressing homelessness, the situation is only going to deteriorate and people in this country are only going to be worse off, and that's not what being in government is about. Being in government, being on this side of the chamber, being in this House, for every member here, is about supporting our communities, our electorates and the country. It's about making sure that we are making good financial and economic decisions, like for the construction of social and affordable housing. It is about making sure we're putting good social policy forward like the Housing Australia Future Fund, which will provide for social and affordable housing that is so desperately needed in this country. People are crying out for housing, and now we—all of us here—finally have the opportunity to make it right. We have the opportunity to invest in an area of need and we have an opportunity to make sure that men, women and children all across the country have a safe place to call home.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I'm proud to be part of a government that intends to make a fundamental difference to the people of our nation who are willing to put the time in and who have worked so hard on these reforms. It's about making a difference to housing and putting roofs over people's heads. We have done this in partnership with so many organisations who have advocated for these reforms, investments and policy changes. All of us in the Senate now have an opportunity to back this package—a package that contains what so many experts and housing organisations have called for for a great many years. Together we can reshape Australia's housing policy, setting in place a legacy where the Commonwealth understands its place in working with the states to ensure that every Australian has suitable, affordable housing that provides them a life and a benchmark for dignity.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The magnitude of the housing crisis is the clarion call to action which successive Liberal-Nationals governments failed to heed. We in the Albanese government are geared for action on this front because a home, as I said in my maiden speech, is like the warmth of a million suns. Let's bring our people out of the shadows and into the light. I commend the bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I would ask those opposite and those on the crossbench: if you care about the community, about those experiencing homelessness or housing stress, about women escaping domestic violence, about veterans who have served our country, about remote Aboriginal communities, about frontline workers, then vote for the bill. Vote for this bill that will increase supply at the bottom of the market for those groups who most need it. If you support women escaping violence, vote for the bill. If you support veterans experiencing homelessness, vote for the bill. If you support frontline workers, vote for the bill. If you support remote Aboriginal communities, vote for the bill. By your actions you shall be known. Now is not the time to play political pointscoring with people's safety, their futures and their lives. Now is not the time to be negative for negative's sake. Now is not the time to throw away good in the pursuit of an unachievable perfect or to make a political point. People need housing. We have a supply problem. We have an affordability problem. This is the start of addressing that problem. I commend the bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We need to make sure that we're providing more support not only for veterans who find themselves in these situations but for Australians more broadly. And that is what this bill is all about. It represents the Albanese Labor government's commitment to ensure that this government does all it can to provide that fundamental, basic human right that Australians need and deserve and should expect from government—a reasonably priced roof over their heads for themselves and their families. That is, importantly, what this particular bill will help us build into the future.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Even more specifically, in my community in the Blue Mountains and the Hawkesbury, $1 million of this funding, as it starts to be returned—because the fund is created, and it's making returns, and we're able to take out the funds we need—is going to go to my community for additional crisis accommodation. Anyone opposing this is saying to the people of the Blue Mountains and the Hawkesbury, 'You don't deserve what has been committed to you.' I urge those opposite, the Liberals, the Nationals and the Greens: please support this fund. Please do something that may not be perfect in your mind but you know is going to make a significant difference, and help us stop the 10 years of policy drift that this sector has seen that has landed us where we are. This is one really practical step we can take to start to turn things around.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills are designed to deliver on that responsibility and to deliver on our 2022 election promises. This legislation will set up the Housing Australia Future Fund, a $10 billion fund that will be invested, with the returns to fund social and affordable housing.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I ask the opposition to reconsider their position. I ask the Greens political party to work with us and the crossbenchers to invest and implement these critical reforms that are so needed for so many Australians. What are we here for if not to serve them in that capacity, in good faith? Work with us to provide the national leadership to address housing affordability across Australia.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We have established the $10 billion Housing Australia Future Fund. The returns on the fund will build 30,000 new social and affordable homes in the fund's first five years, including 4,000 homes for women and children impacted by domestic violence, or older women at risk of homelessness. In an historic deal, we are working with states, territories and the private sector to build more homes. We have set an ambitious target of one million homes by the end of decade. This is big, nation-building stuff that will transform the lives of so many.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 establishes the Housing Australia Future Fund. Distributions from the fund will support the delivery of social and affordable homes, including 30,000 new dwellings over its first five years of operation, as well as helping address acute housing needs for people most at need in our society.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The passage of the Housing Australia Future Fund Bill will be an incredibly important step forward and a moment for this place to really fight to turn the tide on housing affordability in this country.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It's clear what the Senate now needs to do, and that is end the delays and support these bills right now.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We haven't had a federal government that cares about social and affordable housing for a long, long time. Everyone in this place needs to back this bill so that finally we can get that leadership started, because every level of government needs to be involved. There's nothing more important than a safe, affordable place to call home.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This is desperate, this is urgent and I encourage all members to rethink this and support our bills. People need to find decent housing. It is an absolute human right to ensure they have dignity and access to housing. I very proudly commend all these bills to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So I say to this House that this is a big step forward. This is a good bill, and I congratulate the Minister for Housing and also the Minister for Education, who was the shadow minister for housing and helped design this policy. This policy will help thousands of Australians. This policy that we are debating will mean that literally thousands of women and children are not turned away from domestic violence shelters. This policy means that nurses and other frontline workers, like police and cleaners, will have an affordable home to live in. This policy will get the federal government back into the provision of housing in Australia.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to speak today in support of this incredibly important legislation—the Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 and related bills—that will make a huge difference to the lives of Australians. I am incredibly proud to be part of a Labor government who are again delivering on an election commitment central to what we took to the last election, and that was about the importance of housing to the dignity, security, health and prosperity of all people. That is why this was such an important part of the platform we took to the last election and we are delivering on it with urgency in this place.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“To solve the problem of housing affordability and the shortfall in supply of housing in this country requires action. That is what these bills go to. We are taking responsibility for people in our communities by making sure we have a vision for not just now and the medium term but the long term of this country. I am really pleased and proud to support these bills today.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I am delighted to stand here and support these bills, these bills that are going to fundamentally make a difference. Is a gambling? No. We have a range of this type of funding across government that has been running well for many years, thank you very much. All of the scaremongering and the hoo-ha is just a disgrace. This is just political grandstanding. We are standing here with a series of bills and a policy that are going to make a fundamental difference to housing in this country, and that is something we should all get behind. Try to put some of that political spin, and muck and bother, away and think about those people out there tonight who cannot find affordable housing—single parents, key workers, families who are struggling. This is, critically, about the good and the wellbeing of the people of Australia. I commend these bills to this chamber.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
21 speakers · 1 support · 19 oppose · 1 unclear
“Most relevantly for today's discussions, we will not be supporting the establishment of the Housing Australia Future Fund Bill. This is probably one of the most egregious examples of the financial engineering that we've seen from the government. Indeed, it has become a hallmark of the government since very soon after taking office—trying to facilitate significant government spending in off-budget items through funds such as this.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“With this in mind, the coalition will not be supporting the Housing Australia Future Fund Bill. Of course, many stakeholders have outlined concerns with the bill, including the limited capacity for conferring grants under the Housing Australia Future Fund and failure to define key terms. I've worked in the property sector and I know that a lot of the key terms that are used in different legislation and regulations really do make or break it. We haven't yet got a definition of what social housing is and of what affordable housing is. And what definition is going to be used for acute housing? There are also, of course, the limitations on the annual drawdown, which has been highlighted by some stakeholders. There is no mechanism or performance criteria to assess the effectiveness of the grants and there is no guarantee that grants started under the Housing Australia Future Fund will continue. Importantly, there is the small number of social and affordable homes that the fund will actually provide.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“But this bill is nothing to do with specific measures around housing. It is a complete cop-out. It is absolutely cowardly. It is saying: 'We're not prepared to make tough decisions within the budgetary framework, so instead we'll come up with this magic-pudding economics of borrowing money and earning more than the cost of it, and then we can spend that money.' We have to stand up to this, right here, right now. And that is why I urge the House not to support the second reading of this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I say that this future fund is just another part of the problem we have in this country. Somehow, we think that gambling on and shuffling paper is actually going to create more—it will not. I say: lower the immigration rate, get our own population working again—in real industries—so that we can build our way to prosperity.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Stakeholders have also criticised the limit on annual draw-downs, the lack of funding certainty, with no performance criteria to assess the effectiveness of the grants. The bill describes a five-year review time frame. That is wholly inadequate given the uncertainty I've just outlined around the funding model. Stakeholders have requested a much shorter period but, again, we know this government talks about transparency but nothing in their actions actually show it. This is a crucial question, because by designating this fund as off-budget spending, the government are committing to a return on investment for this capital. The reality is that this is smoke and mirrors from this government. We're on to step four, and those opposite are ensuring a significant lack of detail in the bill so they're not held to account. The investment mandate has yet to be released, restricting further scrutiny in key information on the fund's capability to deliver the government's election commitments. Without an investment mandate, this legislation is essentially a shell, with all key aspects to the operations of the fund likely to be contained in the investment mandate which has not been made public. On that basis alone, the coalition will not support this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It's very, very important that the people of Australia understand what is being proposed by the government today. It is not a situation where the government is proposing to put $10 billion directly into housing today. The government is proposing to borrow $10 billion and get the future fund to invest that $10 billion in the share market, the international share market, or government bonds, equities, private equity, whatever it is; and then only the returns from that $10 billion will go into providing housing. That's the risk, and that goes to the core of the objection that the coalition has with respect to this policy.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We oppose this bill because it does nothing to help struggling families throughout this nation.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“For the reasons stated, I oppose this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I rise to speak on the Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 and related bills. The coalition does not support these bills, and not for the reasons Senator Sheldon just outlined. We support social housing. We want to see more social housing. We want to see the federal and state governments do more to address this issue. We just don't believe that this fund is the way to deliver it. I dare say that it won't deliver the ambitious targets they are saying it will deliver.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Australians need a policy that will deliver greater supply of land, remove the grit in the wheels, get rid of zoning laws and the gridlock of approvals and get down the cost of new homes, not more vanity funds that are in Labor's stable. So my coalition colleagues and I will oppose this irresponsible and poorly thought out bill that will cost Australians billions more while not guaranteeing even a single new house for one Australian family.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I think it is a very disappointing outcome and will be voting against this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“For these, and for many other reasons, the coalition will not support the establishment of the Housing Australia Future Fund. It's a hoax, it's a fraud and it's most likely going to be the biggest slush fund that Labor have managed to get for themselves.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“On these two issues alone, the Australian people would expect the coalition to vote against this bill. But, when you put it into the context of the government's housing agenda, the false promises and failures would cast doubt even in the minds of those who lent Labor their vote at the last election. After nine months in office, I ask the government: Where are the 30,000 new social and affordable homes that you promised? Where is your Help to Buy program that you said would commence on 1 January 2023? What are you doing to address supply chain shortages for building materials? How are you supporting the interstate and international migration of skilled workforces for construction? What are you doing about increasing rents, which have grown by 10.2 per cent, setting a new record? (Time expired)”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“That's why I believe there are enough concerns in this area for me to not support the bill—that we go along this pathway of propping up state governments, that we give up on the idea of Australian homeownership. I think that's the most central point.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We will not be supporting the establishment of this fund.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“But, when it comes to the lives of northern Tasmanians, now is not the time to let the perfect be the enemy of the good. As the government, you are expected to solve these issues, and I'm not going to get in the way. But supporting you does not get you off the hook if you don't deliver what is promised through this bill. I will act in good faith, but I will be holding you to account to ensure that you have delivered what it is that you have promised.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Sadly, I don't believe that this Labor government's housing policy, after promising the world to Australians, will deliver what is proposed. We'll see the number of first home buyers dramatically decrease. We'll see very few, if any, of the 30,000 new social and affordable homes ever started. Rents will continue to increase. Now they want to add further fuel to the inflationary flame through the upward pressure on interest rates that this policy will generate. These consequences follow a common thread through many areas of the government's policy and their history over the years, and it is this: their rhetoric never matches the implementation of what they've proposed to do. It is the coalition, with its track record, that I would ask the government to consider emulating, because it has generated real and tangible benefits for Australians right across this country. I oppose this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“What has happened is a joke. This will cause some good, I grant you that, but not for some time. Don't sell it as an answer to everything, because really it's an answer to very little.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill is about playing accounting tricks with the budget while dodging the responsibility of actually getting houses built.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Before making my contribution, I just want to respond to a few of the points raised by Senator Walsh. In particular, we're not voting against the Housing Australia Future Fund Bill because of fear, Senator Walsh. We're voting against this bill because it is bad policy. I'll talk about why in a moment, but let me make that very clear.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The other area that is of particular concern is around domestic violence. That area has one of the fastest-growing rates of homelessness as well. With this bill the government wants to build 700 new homes, I think, for women and children escaping DV. But the former Morrison government built 6,000 places for women and children escaping domestic violence.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
10 speakers · 6 support · 3 oppose · 1 mixed
“So we now have an additional $3 billion of direct funding to go to build social and affordable housing. Of course, $2 billion of that was announced with the Social Housing Accelerator a couple of months back, and then just yesterday a further $1 billion was announced by the Prime Minister as a result of negotiation with the Greens. This is in addition, of course, to the agreement to have a minimum spend of $500 million from the Housing Australia Future Fund, even if the gamble on the stock market doesn't pay off for you that year. What we've really shown is that pressure works. We have secured an additional $3 billion for social and affordable homes, building thousands of homes for low-income renters, and we will now allow the HAFF to pass through the Senate this sitting week.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“To blindly support a housing package that will see the housing crisis get worse without scrutiny or negotiation would be an abdication of our responsibility to the millions of people crying out for a good, affordable home.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We've also heard evidence at our inquiries into poverty in Australia and in our inquiries into the worsening rental crisis of how housing represents the highest cost in most family budgets. Those with lower housing costs, especially those who own houses outright, can achieve a higher standard of living than people on the same income who have higher housing costs. The more people pay on rent the less they have for other essentials, like food, medication and essential health care. At the poverty inquiry, Isabelle told us:”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The reality is that we do have the money to fix the housing crisis in this country, just as we have the money to lift everyone out of poverty. It is purely a matter of political will. Labor's plan and this bill will make the housing and rental crisis worse. But Labor is really the only obstacle standing in the way of solving the housing crisis. We won't stop fighting on behalf of the millions of people who are in housing stress and who are being left behind. We will not stop fighting, and I hope that Labor can see sense, can come to the table and come up with a plan that actually helps people, not one that puts them into more distress.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Yes, let's get the bill passed. Let's see $3 billion freed up this year to build a surge of public and affordable housing but then let's commit together as a parliament not to hand over to some cruel market ideology people's homes and the security for their family but invest in public housing with public money, with the wealth that only this parliament can give to a key national crisis.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We are here, unashamedly, as the party of renters. We hear their concerns and we are here to give voice to and act on their concerns. We're proud to have delivered what we have through standing up and demanding that Labor be better: an extra $3 billion available immediately to build public and affordable homes in Australia, and turning a $500 million annual disbursement from a maximum to a minimum. But the job isn't over yet, and there's a long, long way to go before renters have real justice in Australia.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“To all the housing campaigners that are listening to this debate tonight: thank you for your energy, your enthusiasm and your commitment. Together, we took on an intransigent, corporate owned government and extracted $3 billion and vital changes to the program, and we will continue until rents are frozen and affordable. (Time expired)”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The proposals before us—the HAFF and the $3 billion on the table, resulting from pressure from the Greens—are not enough, but they are an important advance on what we had nine months ago.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So the opposition will say no and the Greens will say: 'Do better. Have something in this bill that addresses the real crisis that renters find themselves in. Let's look at First Nations housing. Let's make sure we spend some real money, not just have a gamble on the stock market and then cap how much is going to be spent and, in some years, spend nothing at all.' These are real proposals that will help fix the problem, not see the problem get worse. That is the fundamental problem with the approach the government is taking: if this bill is passed as it is, the problem will get worse than it is now. The problem will be worse than it is now at the end of the next few years.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Incredibly, and even in the face of countless stories like Emma's, the government's Housing Australia Future Fund will actually worsen the shortage of social housing and cut its yearly housing funding. Let's break down why. Labor's plan will see $10 billion invested in a fund where they pay investment managers to put that money into the stock market in the hopes that it will generate a return. It's not a $10 billion direct investment in housing. It's a $10 billion gamble on the stock market, with spending on new homes capped at $500 million per year and not indexed to inflation. At best, this plan will only see three per cent of the current need in Australia addressed.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
2 speakers · 2 oppose
“One Nation opposes this Soviet-style reckless, wasteful market intervention. One Nation proposes getting down to basics: cutting immigration until housing and infrastructure catch up; cutting red tape, green tape and blue UN tape; comprehensively reforming taxation to give Australians a fair go; shrinking government to fit the Constitution; and getting the government the hell out of people's lives, enabling people to make choices that suit people's and families' needs. We do not need more bureaucrats and more waste; we need more houses, real houses. We need a return to basics. Let the tradies of Australia get on with the job.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These bills do not address the cause of the national housing and rental crisis and, in terms of increasing housing supply, they are worthless. One Nation will not support this legislation.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
10 speakers · 8 support · 2 mixed
“I support these bills. They are the start of much-needed housing reform in this country—an area that has been neglected for far too long and is reaching crisis levels across the country, and, indeed, in my electorate of Indi. We are currently experiencing, in my patch, an unprecedented level of housing demand—something that I have not seen in the long, long time that I've lived in the area. From big towns, like Wodonga and Wangaratta, to small towns, like Corryong in the north and Alexandra in the south, people are constantly talking to me about the housing crisis.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In sum, I want to make it clear that I agree with CHPs who have raised concerns that the funding is inadequate and that 30,000 homes may not be enough, but we must start somewhere, and having some social and affordable housing is, I suppose, better than having none. I support the minister in her efforts to take these measured steps to ensure we are helping the most needy and vulnerable. Community housing can change lives, as it has changed mine and my family's. Jessica, whose life was transformed by community housing, reminded us why we must get this right when she said, 'Having a safe place to go to is the most important thing in life.'”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In finishing, is this legislation perfect? No, it's not. But it's a start, and a start is what we must make. To delay would leave thousands of people languishing. Inaction is the only action that is unacceptable.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I'm grateful to the boffins at the Grattan Institute who came up with this idea. I'm grateful to Labor for endorsing it as part of their election campaign. I'm grateful to the Greens for finally backing it. It's not where I would have started. But, for where we've ended up, I'm over the moon. This will mean so much for those who need it. I won't delay it a minute longer.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Overall, it's a great aspiration to tackle the housing crisis. I will support this package in light of that, because something has to give, but I ask the government to take on board these remarks, gathered and synthesised from experts and key stakeholders, because the genuine feedback is that this package is full of holes.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I welcome this bill and I hope that it does is much good as the minister promises. But, as I said, I do have some concerns, particularly with regard to off-budget spending.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“So I support this bill but I urge the government to guarantee the integrity of the board—it must be independent—and ensure the transparency of funding agreements. Again, after too many programs have been rorted, it is imperative that this be a program that is not rorted. I urge the government to leverage the funding agreements to drive improvements in the quality of housing that we're talking about—housing electrification—and drive mandatory inclusion zoning in developments. There are many more tools to improve access to affordable housing in Australia.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In the meantime, I commend the government for committing to start to address this fundamental need.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I support these bills. This can't be the only thing we do. I think we need to work with mum-and-dad investors as well to see whether there's a way that we can have some sort of partnership with those people who want to build individual affordable houses rather than this just being large NGOs who are delivering affordable housing. We have a housing crisis right around Australia. It is felt by families, by older Australians and certainly by young people, who feel that they have been robbed of the Australian dream.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate calls on the Government to commence urgent negotiations with state and territory governments in relation to the implementation of the following reforms:”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered., opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 84 to 49.
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered., meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Consideration in detail debate
Consideration in detail
The chamber considered the bill in detail and dealt with amendments before the next stage.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered., opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading debate
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Recorded vote: 34 to 27.
Second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered. agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second readingThe stage in Parliament where members debate whether they support a bill in principle before detailed amendments are considered., meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Committee of the whole: amendments considered
Amendment packages agreed
The chamber considered amendments before the bill moved to the next stage.
Senate · Bill agreed to, subject to requests
Recorded vote: 36 to 26.
Bill agreed to, subject to requests
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Consideration of Senate message
House made Senate requested amendments
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
House · Consideration of Senate message
Consideration of Senate message
The House dealt with Senate amendments or requests so both chambers could settle the bill in the same form.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-General gave Royal AssentThe final formal step that turns a passed bill into an Act of Parliament., turning the bill into an Act.
Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (22/03/2023)
Referred to committee
Referred to Committee (9 Feb 2023): Senate Economics Legislation Committee; Committee report (22 Mar 2023)
APH bill page notes