Mark Dreyfus
Dreyfus supports the bill, saying it will improve transparency and accountability by requiring public notification of key executive appointments and revocations.
Read in Hansard ↗This bill became law on Nov 28th, 2023.
Government & democracy
Australians will be able to look up who sits on the Federal Executive CouncilThe formal body that approves and records key executive decisions made by the Governor-General and ministers., who is running each federal department, and which ministerial offices people hold.
Scott Morrison’s secret appointments to five extra portfolios, only exposed by media reports in August 2022, left Australians unable to see who held key executive powers. The bill requires public notices on the Federal Register when people are appointed to or removed from the Federal Executive CouncilThe formal body that approves and records key executive decisions made by the Governor-General and ministers., departments and ministerial offices.
Between March 2020 and May 2021, Scott Morrison was secretly appointed to administer five extra portfolios on top of Prime Minister and Cabinet, and when media reports exposed those appointments in mid-August 2022 the government released Solicitor-GeneralThe government’s senior legal adviser, whose advice is quoted here on the constitutional problem with the appointments. advice, set up the Bell inquiryThe inquiry led by Virginia Bell that examined the secret ministerial appointments and recommended reforms. and received a report finding the episode had undermined responsible governmentThe system where ministers must be answerable to Parliament and, through it, to the public.. The bill, introduced on 1 December 2022 and enacted in November 2023, responded by requiring public register notices of key executive and ministerial appointments and removals so Australians could see who held those powers.
No significant public case against the bill is recorded so far, and the available debate does not show a substantive warning that the new publication rules would cause harm or major practical problems. The criticism case appears minimal to nonexistent, with no party represented in the debate opposing the bill and speakers across the chamber backing it as a transparency measure.
Mark Dreyfus MPA federal elected representative; the page uses the title after names such as Anthony Albanese MP and Mark Dreyfus MP. introduced this bill. It passed on the voices.
Did it become law?
Yes
Became law 28 Nov 2023
Final passage
Passed without a counted vote
Members called out ‘aye’ or ‘no’ — no individual votes were recorded.
Passage speed
362 days
From introduction to the latest recorded parliamentary step
Meaning
Australians will be able to look up who sits on the Federal Executive CouncilThe formal body that approves and records key executive decisions made by the Governor-General and ministers., who is running each federal department, and which ministerial offices people hold.
The Official Secretary to the Governor-GeneralThe official who must publish the notices that make these appointments and removals public. must publish notices on the Federal Register of LegislationThe public federal website where legal notices and laws are published so people can see them. when people are appointed to, or removed from, key federal executive and ministerial roles.
Each public notice must identify the person involved, the relevant department or ministerial office, and the date the appointment or change took effect.
These new publication rules only apply to appointments and removals made after the law started, rather than rewriting earlier decisions.
The Ministers of State Amendment Bill 2022 forms part of the Government’s response to this Inquiry. The Bill amends the Ministers of State Act 1952 to provide for greater transparency and accountability at the Commonwealth level of Australia’s system of government by ensuring the Australian people are able to access information in relation to the composition of the Federal Executive Council, those who have been appointed to administer which Departments of State, and the offices that Ministers of State hold.Ministers of State Amendment explanatory memorandum
Specifically, the Bill amends the Ministers of State Act 1952 to provide that the Official Secretary to the Governor-General must publish by notifiable instrument, registered on the Federal Register of Legislation, as soon as reasonably practicable, advising that the Governor-General has:Ministers of State Amendment introduced bill text
The Bill also requires the notifiable instrument to specify the name of the relevant Executive Councillor, officer and the department of State of the Commonwealth, Minister of State and the office, and the date of effect. The notifiable instrument may comprise a copy of a relevant instrument made by the Governor-General.Ministers of State Amendment explanatory memorandum
Sections 5, 6 and 6A of the Ministers of State Act 1952, as inserted by this Schedule, apply in relation to an exercise of power by the Governor‑General that occurs after the commencement of this item.Ministers of State Amendment Act 2023 final Act text
Context
Between March 2020 and May 2021, Scott Morrison was secretly appointed to administer five extra portfolios on top of Prime Minister and Cabinet, and when media reports exposed those appointments in mid-August 2022 the government released Solicitor-GeneralThe government’s senior legal adviser, whose advice is quoted here on the constitutional problem with the appointments. advice, set up the Bell inquiryThe inquiry led by Virginia Bell that examined the secret ministerial appointments and recommended reforms. and received a report finding the episode had undermined responsible governmentThe system where ministers must be answerable to Parliament and, through it, to the public.. The bill, introduced on 1 December 2022 and enacted in November 2023, responded by requiring public register notices of key executive and ministerial appointments and removals so Australians could see who held those powers.
Scott Morrison is secretly appointed to five extra portfolios
The former prime minister was appointed by the Governor-GeneralThe King’s representative in Australia who formally appoints ministers and approves executive decisions on this page. to administer five additional departments without those appointments being made public at the time.
Ministers of State Amendment explanatory memorandum ↗Media reports expose the secret ministerial appointments
Public reporting revealed the hidden appointments and showed Australians could not reliably see who held key executive powers.
Ministers of State Amendment explanatory memorandum ↗Solicitor-GeneralThe government’s senior legal adviser, whose advice is quoted here on the constitutional problem with the appointments. advice says responsible governmentThe system where ministers must be answerable to Parliament and, through it, to the public. was undermined
The government published legal advice stating that the former prime minister's actions had fundamentally undermined the principles of responsible governmentThe system where ministers must be answerable to Parliament and, through it, to the public..
Ministers of State Amendment explanatory memorandum ↗Government establishes the Bell inquiryThe inquiry led by Virginia Bell that examined the secret ministerial appointments and recommended reforms.
Anthony Albanese and Mark Dreyfus announced an inquiry led by former High Court Justice Virginia Bell to examine the appointments and recommend changes.
Ministers of State Amendment explanatory memorandum ↗Bell inquiryThe inquiry led by Virginia Bell that examined the secret ministerial appointments and recommended reforms. report is provided to the government
The report examined the facts, the rules around ministerial appointments and options for legislative or procedural reform to improve transparency and accountability.
Ministers of State Amendment explanatory memorandum ↗Bill is introduced to require public notices of appointments
The government presented legislation to require publication on the Federal Register of LegislationThe public federal website where legal notices and laws are published so people can see them. when key executive and ministerial appointments or removals take effect.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Parliament passes the bill
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, clearing the way for the new publication rules to become law.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Royal AssentThe final formal approval that turns a bill into an Act of Parliament. makes the transparency changes law
Royal AssentThe final formal approval that turns a bill into an Act of Parliament. turned the bill into an Act, applying the new disclosure requirements to future appointments and removals rather than past decisions.
Parliamentary timeline ↗Legislative route
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Introduced and read a first time
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Second reading moved
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Second reading agreed to
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Third reading agreed to
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Finally passed both Houses
The Governor-GeneralThe King’s representative in Australia who formally appoints ministers and approves executive decisions on this page. gave Royal AssentThe final formal approval that turns a bill into an Act of Parliament., turning the bill into an Act.
Key criticism
No significant public case against the bill is recorded so far, and the available debate does not show a substantive warning that the new publication rules would cause harm or major practical problems. The criticism case appears minimal to nonexistent, with no party represented in the debate opposing the bill and speakers across the chamber backing it as a transparency measure.
No significant public case against the bill is recorded so far.
Votes
The bill passed both chambers on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage.
House agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Senate agreed to the bill's third reading on the voices, so there is no list of individual Aye and No votes for final passage in that chamber.
Passed on the voices
In a voice vote, members call out Aye or No and the presiding officer judges which side has it. Individual names are only recorded if a formal division is called.
Parliamentary debate
Start here — lead voices
Dreyfus supports the bill, saying it will improve transparency and accountability by requiring public notification of key executive appointments and revocations.
Read in Hansard ↗Ryan supports the bill because it will improve transparency over executive appointments and stop any future prime minister from secretly taking on multiple ministerial roles.
Read in Hansard ↗Tim Watts supports the bill, saying it implements the Bell inquiryThe inquiry led by Virginia Bell that examined the secret ministerial appointments and recommended reforms. recommendation to improve transparency and accountability in how ministers and departments are appointed.
Read in Hansard ↗Julian Hill supports the bill and says it is a necessary if small step to restore integrity and transparency after the former prime minister secretly appointed himself to multiple ministries.
Read in Hansard ↗All speeches by bloc
50 speakers · 53 contributions · 50 support
“The government has accepted all of Ms Bell's recommendations, with this bill implementing recommendation 1. The bill provides that the Official Secretary to the Governor-General must publish a notifiable instrument, which will be registered on the publicly accessible Federal Register of Legislation as soon as is reasonably practicable, advising that the Governor-General has chosen, summoned and sworn an executive councillor to the federal Executive Council under section 62 of the Constitution; appointed an officer to administer a department of state; or directed a minister of state to hold an office under section 65 of the Constitution. This bill will apply to appointments made by the Governor-General that take place following the commencement of the act.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The bill will provide greater integrity and transparency around appointments to public office. It will be a small step, but it turns out a necessary step, in case those opposite ever get into government again, in restoring checks and balances to make sure that what the previous Prime Minister, the member for Cook, did can never happen again. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The immediate thing we're debating here today is a very important piece of legislation to remedy a breach in practice that I believe was completely unnecessary and egregious. It's a reflection of a previous government that acted in that manner in so many other ways—in delaying the national anticorruption commission and in the way it allocated funds. This bill is very important, and it's critical that this government continues to build on integrity in government to improve the way in which government operates for the sake of all.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I'm proud to be part of a government that is bringing integrity back to this matter; I'm proud that, when we found out about this outrageous breach of Westminster convention, it was referred for a proper, thorough inquiry; and I'm proud that we have acted by bringing this legislation, which I urge every member—whatever your political stripes—to vote for.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Lastly, I could note many contributions in this place on the Ministers of State Amendment Bill 2022 but I would like to take particular note of the brief contribution made by the member for Hume. That very succinct statement made on this bill gives me a bit of hope. It is indeed my hope that, although I did not hear full-throated support of the bill, I did hear support—a bit lukewarm, but it was supportive nevertheless. Just as with the establishment of the National Anti-Corruption Commission, the public will see a new page turned by our democratic institutions with the support of all sides of politics, particularly the two parties of government. I would encourage all members of this place to support this bill and take one further step forward to restoring public confidence in government, for, with the passage of this bill, the chapter we move on from cannot be repeated. I thank the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“That's why we're committed to this legislation. It will fall to us—the Labor Party—to uphold the virtue of those institutions and the parliament, so that there is proper recourse and accountability, and we proudly do that because we believe in all those values and we fight for all those values. I certainly commend this bill to the House. It is very important. It will ensure that a person cannot ever again garner powers without that adequate and warranted accountability to the Australian people, to the Australian parliament and to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This legislation is important because of what the member for Cook did. It's sad we've got to do it, but it's a matter of necessity and I support it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The advice of the Solicitor-General was damning. Between March 2020 and May 2021, the member was Cook was appointed by the Governor-General to administer no less than five departments: Health; Finance; Industry, Science, Energy and Resources; Treasury; and Home Affairs. These are your big-ticket items here in parliament, and the actual ministers appointed had no idea—not a clue. His cabinet had no idea. It turns out the former member for Tangney knew; he got the secret prize of Home Affairs. Who else that remains in this place knew that the leader of the coalition was misleading his cabinet, misleading his party room and, most importantly, misleading the Australian people? He said that it was because of the extraordinary times and that the pandemic created the obstacles where, indeed, this was justified. I say to you: there are no circumstances that justify deception. They were indeed extraordinary times, and if indeed it was so necessary for him to take on those additional roles the people of Australia would have understood. He should have been straight with us. He should have been straight with his own people. Sadly, that was not the case.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This legislation is just one part of the Albanese government's commitment to respond to Justice Bell's Inquiry into the Appointment of the Former Prime Minister to Administer Multiple Departments. This legislation is just one part of our commitment to the Australian people to safeguard our democracy and to ensure that the people of Australia can stand proud in their trust in this place. We understand that democracy is precious, and we understand that when it is challenged, as it was by the member for Cook, it needs to be defended. We know that we must restore trust in and integrity to politics, and this bill, in the timely manner in which it has come to this place, shows our commitment to achieving just that.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I would encourage all members in this place to support this bill to take one further step to restore public confidence in government.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The introduction of this bill shows that the Albanese government is delivering on its promise to restore trust and integrity to federal politics. The measures in the bill will help restore integrity and transparency in the process of appointing elected officials to high office and ensure that we have a system of government where there are checks and balances. Never let anyone have too much power. Never again will one person be able to garner powers without adequate and warranted accountability, both to the Australian people and, more importantly, to the Australian parliament, where their representatives sit.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The bill requires the Official Secretary to the Governor-General to publish a notifiable instrument registered on the Federal Register of Legislation as soon as reasonably practicable—not months later or only when FOI documents are revealed or only when someone tells it to a journalist for a book that's going to be published.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This legislation is one part of the Albanese government's response to Justice Bell's inquiry. It will end the possibility of Australians not knowing who runs their government.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“But let's look at the bill itself. This bill will make law the recommendations of the Bell inquiry. It merely requires public notice to be given in various ways about who is minister for what and for when. It's a simple bill for an act that seems to do very little. Someone wandering in from the street might look at it and say, 'Why do you even need a law to do that?' Well, for 120 years we didn't. For 120 years we had managed to get by with prime ministers who had enough knowledge of and respect for the institutions and conventions of government in this country that we didn't need such a law. Now, unfortunately, we do need it. I support the bill. For 120 years we have managed to get by with prime ministers who had enough knowledge of and respect for the institutions and conventions of government in this country, and we didn't need such a law. Now, unfortunately, we do need it. I support the bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“These amendments that the Labor government is introducing are essential to restoring trust in government. They ensure that the Australian people are able to access information in relation to the composition of the Federal Executive Council, those who have been appointed to administer certain departments of state, and the high offices that ministers of state hold.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In my electorate of Swan, time and time again people have been telling me that the minimum requirement for being a member of parliament is integrity, principles. I think it's extraordinary that we have this bill where we need to actually look at this. Under the previous Liberal government, there were no actions on a national anticorruption commission. There was not a draft bill. Legislation was not introduced to the House. They were asleep at the wheel. The substance of this bill is making sure that we have a parliament that we can trust, a democracy that we can believe in and a democracy that we can have for future generations.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It is a sad day in this country that this bill is required to make sure that future elected officials abide by long-standing and honoured conventions, yet here we are. Along with the National Anticorruption Commission, this bill aims to start to fix the loss of trust the Australian public has with elected officials, and to fix the lack of accountability we saw in the last government. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“That is why this bill is so important. It will implement reforms to provide greater transparency and accountability at the Commonwealth level of government. It will stop things like the rorting of sports grants and the rorting of grants intended for flood relief et cetera during previous natural disasters.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I wish there had been no need for this bill—obviously, everyone does—but there clearly is a need, so I commend this bill to the House and welcome this reform that will strengthen transparency and good governance, no matter the government of the day. Crucially, this bill will also help to restore citizens' trust in government from the dangerously low levels we have seen. Earlier in my contribution I went through that slide in trust in government that we've seen in the last decade.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I hope the conservatives will join us in supporting this bill and saying that the undemocratic, secretive power grabs of the former prime minister, coming in this place and abusing the very institution that we are all proud to be a part of, should absolutely never happen again. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The Ministers of State Amendment Bill will go a long way to restoring that trust. It is important for my electorate of Pearce that I speak on this bill. The Ministers of State Amendment Bill provides for greater transparency and accountability in Commonwealth administration, something Australians want and deserve.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Those wrongs will be righted when this legislation passes the House and laws will be put into place to ensure that this sorry saga can't be repeated by any prime minister in Australia's future.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This government wants to put Australia democracy on a much healthier and higher quality foundation. We're doing that with this bill—which shouldn't really need to be passed—to simply make it crystal clear, particularly to those opposite, that Australians are entitled to expect accountability and transparency from their government. We've done it with the National Anti-Corruption Commission, and we'll continue to do it through the leadership and conduct of the Albanese Labor government.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“That is why this bill is so important, and I'm pleased to join so many of my colleagues not only in committing to vote for the Ministers of State Amendment Bill but in placing on the record my very serious view about the need for this bill. Perhaps we shouldn't see the need for such a bill. Perhaps it's understandable that, over the course of the 120-odd years of our Commonwealth parliamentary democracy, no-one previously thought that it could be required, because it is absolutely extraordinary that a prime minister would commission, or cause to be commissioned, ministers into office without informing the public, without informing his colleagues around the cabinet table and without informing the parliament.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“We are doing this to fulfil Labor's promise to make parliament and all politicians more accountable to the people who give us our jobs. This is just one of the many initiatives and pieces of legislation we are introducing after making a policy of transparency and accountability a key element of our promise to the Australian people. I know this is important to Australians, especially to constituents of our electorate of McEwen. From community meetings to chats on polling booths, to conversations I have when I just pop down the shop, I know integrity in government is something that is at the forefront of people's minds. This bill will not only work to increase transparency and accountability to the Australian public but it will prevent people from using their ministerial positions as Pokemon cards, when they try and collect them all. I'll leave the debate with one of my favourite Irish sayings: anything that keeps a politician humble is healthy for democracy. We should all take that to heart, and that is why I proudly support this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Michelle Ananda-Rajah on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Ananda-Rajah supports the bill and says it is a needed safeguard after the former government's secret multiple-ministries scandal. She says it will restore integrity and transparency by making ministerial appointments and revocations publicly notifiable.
“These reforms will enshrine the checks and balances required to prevent further attacks on our democracy and expunge the possibility of Australians, the parliament or executive government ever being ignorant of who is running the show.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Ananda-Rajah supports the bill as part of the government's integrity and administrative reforms, saying it will help clear the AAT backlog and improve case management so veterans, pensioners and NDIS participants get better support.
“I rise in continuation to speak on the Ministers of State Amendment Bill 2022. In mid-December last year the Albanese government abolished the AAT and set up a process to find a better model, led by an eminent judge, with merit-based transparent selection at its core. We are appointing 75 members to clear the current backlog, and have committed nearly $12 million towards better case management so that the veteran who served his country is compensated for that service injury, the elder Australian gets their age pension and, like my constituent, the NDIS participant receives funding for essential support so they can live with dignity.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“This piece of legislation, which surely no-one ever contemplated should be needed in this country, goes towards dealing with that embarrassing undermining of democracy episode in Australia's history. I personally think it's inconceivable that it could ever happen again, even without this legislation. Surely we couldn't have another prime minister or another cabinet willing to accept this sort of behaviour, but this piece of legislation will ensure it—because honestly we didn't imagine it would happen in the first place, so who knows what they would do if they ever got their hands on the levers of power again.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I say to members opposite that this legislation is before the House because we don't want to see a repeat of that. It's before the House to try and restore the confidence that the Australian people, I believe, have for almost a century had in the parliament. It's before the House because we want this parliament to operate with transparency and integrity. Quite frankly, it had done so for nearly a century, and all of those traditions and all of that confidence were lost because of the action of one single person, the former member for Cook, the Prime Minister at the time. I commend this legislation to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill would mitigate a similar scenario in the future by ensuring that such decisions were made public. It is a bill that we hope the opposition will support, but that is despite the fact that the opposition leader has described the Bell inquiry as 'a witch-hunt'.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“In conclusion, we should never take our democracy for granted. We should never take trust in our institutions for granted. There are people who are fighting and dying around the world for those principles, for democracy—something that we enjoy here in Australia. The former Prime Minister's actions diminished integrity and trust in our system. That's why we are taking action.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Thankfully, we now have a government that prioritises transparency and accountability. This bill delivers on the commitment to ensure that we have transparency and accountability in our decision-making, particularly when it comes to who is administering government on behalf of the Australian people. In the future, because of this reform, the Australian people will always know who has been sworn in as a minister of state and who is administering government departments on their behalf.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“To those opposite, I say: back this bill. It will show that you don't endorse the actions of the former Prime Minister, who trashed our institutional norms. It will show you support our democracy and its institutions. Thank you.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Unlike the mess and mismanagement of the former government, this side of the chamber is getting on with the job of fixing the problems by investing in the skills that are needed for our future prosperity. The bill that is before us shows the government is delivering on its promises to the Australian people, promises that were made to restore trust and integrity to federal politics.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill demonstrates the government's readiness to act promptly to restore the Australian people's confidence in our federal system of government and to rebuild integrity into public sector institutions and processes and its officials.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill is an important step, an important part of our government's response to the Bell inquiry, to ensure this never happens again. Essentially this bill will mean that when the Governor-General has appointed someone to a portfolio or made a change to that or revoked one of those positions this will be made public as soon as possible.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“Our government is committed to upholding these values and I am proud to support this legislation.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The introduction of this bill shows the government is delivering on its promise to restore trust and integrity to federal politics, the centrepiece of which is the recent introduction of legislation for a powerful, transparent and independent national anticorruption commission. The measures in this bill will go some way to provide greater integrity and transparency around the process of appointing elected officials to high office, especially to ensure that we have a system of government where there are real checks and balances and where one person cannot gain powers without adequate and warranted accountability to the Australian people and the Australian parliament. I am really pleased and proud to support this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I commend this bill to the House and encourage all members who have basic respect for the Australian people to support it too.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill will restore the checks and balances that our system relies on. It will ensure that one person cannot acquire power without any accountability or responsibility. The Australian people should not find out about the undermining of our political system in a book published two years later. The Albanese government is focused on restoring trust and integrity to politics. This bill, like the National Anti-Corruption Commission legislation, seeks to help the Australian people regain lost trust in all of its governments—the trust that has been significantly eroded in recent years.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This legislation highlights the Albanese Labor government's commitment to delivering on an election promise to restore trust and integrity within our federal parliament and within our community. The foundation of this restoration was the recent legislation of a powerful, transparent and independent National Anti-Corruption Commission. The measures in the bill will go some of the way to providing greater integrity and transparency around the process of appointing elected officials to high office; and especially to ensure that we have a system of government where there are checks and balances, a system of government where one person cannot again garner powers without adequate and warranted accountability to the Australian people and the Australian parliament. So I say again: integrity, accountability and transparency are vital in this place.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“I commend the Albanese Labor government on taking the inquiry's recommendations forward. The Ministers of State Amendment Bill 2022 forms one part of the government's response to Ms Bell's recommendations. Specifically, this bill puts an end to secret ministries and to the practice of dishonesty. It marks the start of a new era and a new approach to government—one defined by transparency, accountability and a commitment to democracy.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“With this legislation we work to be worthy of all that by ensuring there will never, ever be a repeat or a sequel of this corrosive, undemocratic action. We have, in this government, a system of Westminster that it is derived from. We also have a cabinet system of government where the prime minister has often been described as the first among equals. But the prime minister of the day is not above the cabinet process and is not above the parliament or accountability. That is why this legislation is important—not because I think there will be someone who will come along and think that it's a good idea to appoint themselves to multiple ministries without telling anyone but because we thought that would never happen in the first place. That is why we need this legislation—to provide that assurance to the Australian people that it will indeed never happen again. I commend the bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“It is vitally important that this get fixed, and I am pleased that this is the bill that will do it.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“This bill shows that the government is delivering on its promises to restore the Australian people's confidence in our federal system of government. I welcome the implementation of the first six recommendations from the Bell inquiry. Our democracy is precious. We must protect it together.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Maria Vamvakinou on this bill. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Second reading speech
Maria Vamvakinou supports the bill and says it is needed to reinforce responsible governmentThe system where ministers must be answerable to Parliament and, through it, to the public. by improving transparency and accountability. She argues it will restore public confidence and implement the first Bell inquiryThe inquiry led by Virginia Bell that examined the secret ministerial appointments and recommended reforms. recommendation.
“This amendment is one important step in restoring the Australian people's confidence in our federal system of government, and it will help to ensure greater transparency and accountability and will implement the first of the six recommendations from the Bell inquiry. It is a step in the rebuilding of integrity in public sector institutions and programs, and I look forward to a strengthened relationship of trust between government and nation through the proper functioning of parliament and executive across all areas of public policy and service delivery. I commend this bill to the House.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Maria Vamvakinou supports the bill because she says it will strengthen accountability and transparency in ministerial responsibility after the secrecy of the previous government. She argues it is needed to rebuild public trust in government and reinforce responsible governmentThe system where ministers must be answerable to Parliament and, through it, to the public..
“I rise to speak in support of the Ministers of State Amendment Bill 2022, and I do so because I believe a primary role of this parliament and of government is to be accountable, transparent and honest with the people we are elected to serve.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“The Government has accepted all of Ms Bell's recommendations and the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet has been directed to implement them. Introduction of this Bill is part of that task.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Hansard records 2 separate contributions by Mark Dreyfus, including an amendment-moving contribution. They are grouped here so the speaker is listed once.
Moved amendment
Dreyfus supports the bill, saying it will improve transparency and accountability by requiring public notification of key executive appointments and revocations. He presents it as part of the government's response to the Bell inquiryThe inquiry led by Virginia Bell that examined the secret ministerial appointments and recommended reforms. and a broader effort to restore trust in federal politics.
“The measures in the bill will restore integrity and transparency to the process of appointing elected officials to high office, and ensure we have a system of government where there are checks and balances. Never again will one person be able to garner powers without adequate, and warranted, accountability to the Australian people and the Australian parliament.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
Second reading speech
Dreyfus supports the bill because it implements the Bell inquiryThe inquiry led by Virginia Bell that examined the secret ministerial appointments and recommended reforms.'s recommendations to improve transparency and accountability around ministerial appointments and executive power. He argues the reforms are needed to restore public trust and make sure this breach of trust cannot happen again.
“The primary purpose of this bill is to implement the first six recommendations of that inquiry. The implementation of these recommendations ensures that the Australian public can have full confidence that this breach of trust can never happen again. As mentioned in the second reading speech, the bill will implement reforms to ensure the Australian people are able to access information relating to the composition of the federal executive council, those appointed to administer certain departments of state, and the high offices that ministers of state hold. This bill demonstrates the government's readiness to act promptly to restore the Australian people's confidence in our federal system of government and to rebuild integrity in public sector institutions, processes and officials.”Read this contribution in Hansard ↗
“I am proud to stand here today and speak on ways in which the Albanese government is strengthening integrity measures in government. This bill will implement reforms to provide greater transparency for the administration of our Commonwealth departments. It will ensure that there is clarity as to who is governing our departments of state and who is sworn in to administer departments. It will address the loopholes that the member for Cook so blatantly abused. Critically, this bill will also ensure that information on the governance of our country will be available for all Australians to find, as it should be. But, most importantly, this bill, as part of a broader suite of measures, will go some way in restoring people's sense of parliament as a trusted institution. None of us can do our jobs if our communities do not trust us, and so we must do all that we can do of what is needed to safeguard our democracy. I commend this bill.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
“The actions that we are taking today seek to strengthen our democracy and its foundations. The member for Cook, by his actions in appointing himself to a number of portfolios in secret, displayed a contempt for this place and its role, and that's been canvassed fully.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 support
“The opposition supports this bill. The opposition will always support sensible legislation that is put before this chamber, and it will in this case. Consistent with recommendation 1 of the Bell inquiry, the legislation requires the making of a notifiable instrument as soon as practicable after the Governor-General chooses, summons and swears in or revokes the membership of an executive councillor under section 62 of the Constitution; appoints or revokes the appointment of an officer to administer a department of state under section 64 of the Constitution; and directs that a minister of state hold an office under section 65 of the Constitution or revokes such a direction. I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
1 speaker · 1 support
“This bill, to ensure greater transparency for executive appointments, shouldn't be necessary. But it will ensure that no future Prime Minister can ride roughshod over the most fundamental principles of responsible government. For that reason, I commend this bill to the House.”Read the full speech in Hansard ↗
Record
House · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
House · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading debate
Second reading debate
The bill reached this recorded parliamentary step.
House · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
House · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Senate · Introduced and read a first time
Introduced
The bill was formally presented to the chamber and read a first time, which starts its parliamentary journey.
Senate · Second reading moved
Second reading opened
A minister or sponsoring member moved the second reading, opening the main debate on the bill's purpose and principles.
Senate · Second reading agreed to
Second reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at second reading, meaning it accepted the bill in principle and allowed it to continue.
Senate · Third reading agreed to
Third reading agreed
The chamber agreed to the bill at third reading, which completed passage through that chamber.
Parliament · Finally passed both Houses
Passed both houses
Both houses passed the bill in the same form, completing parliamentary passage.
Assent · Assent
Assent
The Governor-GeneralThe King’s representative in Australia who formally appoints ministers and approves executive decisions on this page. gave Royal AssentThe final formal approval that turns a bill into an Act of Parliament., turning the bill into an Act.